Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Neurobiology of Disease

Synaptopathy in the Aging Cochlea: Characterizing Early-Neural Deficits in Auditory Temporal Envelope Processing

Aravindakshan Parthasarathy and Sharon G. Kujawa
Journal of Neuroscience 8 August 2018, 38 (32) 7108-7119; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3240-17.2018
Aravindakshan Parthasarathy
Department of Otolaryngology and Eaton–Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aravindakshan Parthasarathy
Sharon G. Kujawa
Department of Otolaryngology and Eaton–Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Progressive age-related cochlear synaptopathy occurs before hair cell loss. A, Schematic cross-section showing three of the ∼20 auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) making synaptic contact with an IHC. Presynaptic ribbons and postsynaptic receptor patches are also schematized. The x–y–z axis shows the viewing angle for the confocal x–y projections shown for example IHCs in (B), where immunostaining reveals the juxtaposition of presynaptic ribbons (red) and postsynaptic receptor patches (green). C, Mean ± SEM percentage survival of cochlear synapses (green line), IHCs (gray solid line), and OHCs (gray dashed line) relative to 16-week-old animals at two cochlear locations and five age groups: 16 weeks (n = 9), 32 weeks (n = 11), 64 weeks (n = 14), 108 weeks (n = 9), and 128 weeks (n = 8). Ages of individual animals were within 5% of each target age.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Synaptopathy is reflected in neural ABR wave 1 amplitudes. A–C, Preneural, OHC-based DPOAE measures. A, Mean ± SEM change in DPOAE thresholds relative to 16-week-old animals at two cochlear locations. B, DPOAE growth functions for the different age groups. C, Scatterplots showing the correlation between DPOAE thresholds and mean number of OHCs per row per imaging region of interest for all animals tested. D–F, Neural, ABR-based measures. D, Mean ± SEM change in ABR wave 1 thresholds relative to 16-week-old animals at two cochlear locations. E, ABR wave 1 growth functions for the different age groups. F, Scatterplots showing the correlation between ABR wave 1 amplitudes at 30 dB SL and mean number of cochlear synapses for all animals tested. Age ranges and group sizes in all panels similar to Figure 1. The oldest age group (128 weeks) in F had fewer animals that had responses at 30 dB SL due to elevated hearing thresholds.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Ouabain differentiates early neural and hair cell-based responses. Shown are mean ± SEM ABR wave 1 thresholds (A) and amplitudes at 30 kHz (B) measured before and after the application of 10 mm ouabain (n = 5) or saline (n = 3) to the round window of the cochlea. Group sizes apply to all panels. C, D, Mean ± SEM DPOAE thresholds and amplitudes at 30 kHz, respectively, for the two groups before and after treatment.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Ouabain differentiates EFRs generated from early neural- and hair cell-based sources. A, Grand-averaged magnitude spectra for the EFRs at 1024 and 4096 Hz AM before and after treatment with ouabain or saline. Black triangles indicate location of AM frequency. B, Individual EFR amplitudes at 1024 and 4096 Hz AM before and after treatment with ouabain or saline. C, Mean ± SEM percentage decrease in EFR amplitudes elicited by AM frequencies between 768 and 4096 Hz. D, Comparison of EFRs at 4096 Hz AM recorded using mastoid electrodes and round window electrodes in five animals. Inset shows the grand-averaged magnitude spectrum (bold) with individual spectra shown behind. All EFRs elicited from the 30 kHz cochlear region at 80 dB SPL.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Temporal processing deficits occur at the cochlear synapse and are correlated with the degree of synaptopathy. A, B, Mean ± SEM EFR amplitudes at 80 dB SPL elicited to AM frequencies between 1024 and 4096 Hz at 12 kHz and 30 kHz frequency regions. Insets in A and B shows magnitude spectra of EFRs at 1024 and 4096 Hz AM with peaks at the respective modulation frequencies against the surrounding noise floor. C, D, Correlation between synapses/IHC and the EFR ratio calculated as the absolute value of log10(EFR1024)/log10(EFR4096) at the two cochlear frequency regions shown in A and B. Age ranges and group sizes were 16 weeks (n = 9), 32 weeks (n = 11), 64 weeks (n = 12), 108 weeks (n = 9), and 128 weeks (n = 7).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    The dynamic range for encoding sound level decreases with age. A, B, Mean ± SEM EFR amplitudes at 1024 Hz AM measured as a function of sound level across the various age groups at 12 and 30 kHz frequency regions. Age ranges and group sizes are similar to Figure 1. Dashed lines indicate responses below the noise floor. C, D, Mean ± SEM EFR amplitudes at equal SLs of 0 dB (threshold) to 30 dB at the two cochlear frequency regions shown in A and B. The oldest age group (128 weeks) had fewer animals that had responses at 30 dB SL due to elevated hearing thresholds, with only two animals at 128 weeks reaching 30 dB SL at 12 kHz (data point not shown). E, F, Correlation between EFR amplitudes from C and D at 30 dB SL and the number of remaining synapses/IHC across all the age groups. Age ranges and group sizes are similar to Figure 5.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Dynamic range for early neural coding of modulation depth decreases with age. A, B, Mean ± SEM EFR amplitudes at 1024 Hz AM measured as a function of AM depth across the various age groups at 12 and 30 kHz frequency regions. Sound level of presentation was 30 dB SL at all age groups except 128 weeks, where the sound level was fixed at 90 dB SPL. Dashed lines indicate responses below the noise floor. Age ranges and group sizes were 16 weeks (n = 8), 32 weeks (n = 6), 64 weeks (n = 9), 108 weeks (n = 6), and 128 weeks (n = 6).

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Responses from the central auditory pathway show signs of compensatory gain with age. Mean ± SEM EFR amplitudes at AM frequencies from 16 to 4096 Hz in octave steps across the various age groups at the 12 kHz (A) and 30 kHz (B) frequency regions. Sound level of presentation was 80 dB SPL. Inset shows mean ± SEM ABR wave 5: wave 1 ratios across age. Age ranges and group sizes are similar to Figure 1.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Two-way ANOVA of DPOAE amplitudes

    SourceSum SqdfMean SqFProb>F
    12 kHz
        Age2.7440.68147.011.8 × 10−87
        Level26.72122.23478.63.1 × 10−297
        Age*level1.51480.0316.752.1 × 10−32
        Error2.785980.005
        Total35.111662
    30 kHz
        Age4.941.22261.87.5 × 10−130
        Level14.22121.18254.31.1 × 10−225
        Age*level1.52480.0316.819.8 × 10−33
        Error2.795980.005
        Total24.3662
    • Test of main effects of age and sound level, as well as their interaction, on DPOAE amplitudes at two cochlear frequencies using two-way ANOVAs. Sum Sq, The sum of squares due to each source of variability; df, degrees of freedom associated with each source; mean Sq, mean squares for each source; F, F-statistic; Prob>F, p-value associated with each source.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Two-way ANOVA of ABR wave 1 amplitudes

    SourceSum SqdfMean SqFProb>F
    12 kHz
        Age0.3520.17357.096.2 × 10−99
        Level0.4580.06115.833.6 × 10−111
        Age*level0.1430.0024.988.3 × 10−20
        Error0.265300.0005
        Total4.55590
    30 kHz
        Age0.1520.07137.293.3 × 10−48
        Level0.1660.0351.731.9 × 10−49
        Age*level0.12400.0035.532.3 × 10−21
        Error0.264980.0005
        Total2.33555
    • Shown are results of test of main effects of age and sound level, as well as their interaction, on ABR wave 1 amplitudes at two cochlear frequencies using two-way ANOVAs.

    • Sum Sq, The sum of squares due to each source of variability; df, degrees of freedom associated with each source; mean Sq, mean squares for each source; F, F-statistic; Prob>F, p-value associated with each source.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Two-way ANOVA of EFR amplitudes at 1024 Hz AM

    SourceSum SqdfMean SqFProb>F
    12 kHz
        Age149.5437.38283.431.8 × 10−116
        Level257.55832.19244.091.5 × 10−150
        Age*level37.12321.168.83.1 × 10−30
        Error53.844090.13
        Total500.76453
    30 kHz
        Age173.57443.4184.554.9 × 10−90
        Level246.63830.82131.121.2 × 10−107
        Age*level26.95320.843.581. × 10−09
        Error95.74070.24
        Total558.7451
    • Shown are results of test of main effects of age and sound level, as well as their interaction, on EFR amplitudes elicited to 1024 Hz AM frequency at two cochlear frequencies using two-way ANOVAs.

    • Sum Sq, The sum of squares due to each source of variability; df, degrees of freedom associated with each source; mean Sq, mean squares for each source; F, F-statistic; Prob>F, p-value associated with each source.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Two-way ANOVA of EFR amplitudes relative to threshold at 1024 Hz AM

    SourceSum SqdfMean SqFProb>F
    12 kHz
        Age8.842.224.942.1 × 10−16
        Level (SL)31.49310.5118.92.6 × 10−42
        Age*level2.17120.182.052.3 × 10−02
        Error15.711780.08
        Total58.7197
    30 kHz
        Age3.640.9114.194.6 × 10−10
        Level (SL)40.04313.34208.128.5 × 10−58
        Age*level2.67120.223.471.3 × 10−04
        Error11.351770.06
        Total60.23196
    • Shown are results of test of the main effects of age and sound level relative to threshold (sensation level), as well as their interaction, on EFR amplitudes elicited to 1024 Hz AM frequency at two cochlear frequencies using two-way ANOVAs.

    • Sum Sq, The sum of squares due to each source of variability; df, degrees of freedom associated with each source; mean Sq, mean squares for each source; F, F-statistic; Prob>F, p-value associated with each source.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Two-way ANOVA of EFR amplitudes with varying AM depths

    SourceSum SqdfMean SqFProb>F
    12 kHz
        Age4.941.2111.323 × 10−08
        Depth93.65518.73174.652.8 × 10−68
        Age*depth1.086200.0540.519.6 × 10−01
        Error19.951860.11
        Total122.40215
    30 kHz
        Age14.6543.6634.385.9 × 10−21
        Depth105.54520.51192.511.3 × 10−67
        Age*depth2.31200.121.083.7 × 10−01
        Error17.901680.11
        Total143.40197
    • Shown are results of test of main effects of age and depth of AM, as well as their interaction, on EFR amplitudes elicited to 1024 Hz AM frequency at two cochlear frequencies using two-way ANOVAs.

    • Sum Sq, The sum of squares due to each source of variability; df, degrees of freedom associated with each source; mean Sq, mean squares for each source; F, F-statistic; Prob>F, p-value associated with each source.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Two-way ANOVA of EFR amplitudes with varying AM frequencies

    SourceSum SqdfMean SqFProb>F
    12 kHz
        Age36.449.150.273.6 × 10−32
        AM frequency336.05748265.151.6 × 10−122
        Age*AM frequency14.62280.522.884.4 × 10−06
        Error52.872920.18
        Total481.6331
    30 kHz
        Age19.2544.8138.428.5 × 10−26
        AM frequency262.5737.5299.31.1 × 10−128
        Age*AM frequency10.12280.362.894.4 × 10−06
        Error36.232900.12
        Total347.55329
    • Shown are results of test of main effects of age and frequency of AM, as well as their interaction, on EFR amplitudes at two cochlear frequencies using two-way ANOVAs.

    • Sum Sq, The sum of squares due to each source of variability; df, degrees of freedom associated with each source; mean Sq, mean squares for each source; F, F-statistic; Prob>F, p-value associated with each source.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 38 (32)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 38, Issue 32
8 Aug 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Synaptopathy in the Aging Cochlea: Characterizing Early-Neural Deficits in Auditory Temporal Envelope Processing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Synaptopathy in the Aging Cochlea: Characterizing Early-Neural Deficits in Auditory Temporal Envelope Processing
Aravindakshan Parthasarathy, Sharon G. Kujawa
Journal of Neuroscience 8 August 2018, 38 (32) 7108-7119; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3240-17.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Synaptopathy in the Aging Cochlea: Characterizing Early-Neural Deficits in Auditory Temporal Envelope Processing
Aravindakshan Parthasarathy, Sharon G. Kujawa
Journal of Neuroscience 8 August 2018, 38 (32) 7108-7119; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3240-17.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • aging
  • auditory nerve
  • compensatory gain
  • EFR
  • hidden hearing loss
  • synaptopathy

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Gene expression-based lesion-symptom mapping: FOXP2 and language impairments after stroke
  • Visual Distortions in Human Amblyopia Are Correlated with Deficits in Contrast Sensitivity
  • Distinct Portions of Superior Temporal Sulcus Combine Auditory Representations with Different Visual Streams
Show more Research Articles

Neurobiology of Disease

  • Noninvasive Biomarkers for Assessing the Excitatory/Inhibitory Imbalance in Children with Epilepsy
  • Common Mechanism Underlying Synaptic Dysfunction Caused by Preformed Fibril-Induced Accumulation of α-Synuclein or Tau in a Culture Propagation Model
  • Sensory Deficits in Mice with Lateral Spinal Cord Hemisection Mimic the Brown–Séquard Syndrome
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.