Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Modeling Schizophrenia's Abnormal Cortical Neural Synchrony in Monkeys

Mavis Kusi, Gregory Brooks, Jarrett Noakes, Enis Hasekiu and Jorge Enrique Ingle Gonzalez
Journal of Neuroscience 22 August 2018, 38 (34) 7375-7377; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1152-18.2018
Mavis Kusi
1Centre for Neuroscience Studies, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mavis Kusi
Gregory Brooks
2Undergraduate Life Sciences Program, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gregory Brooks
Jarrett Noakes
2Undergraduate Life Sciences Program, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jarrett Noakes
Enis Hasekiu
2Undergraduate Life Sciences Program, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jorge Enrique Ingle Gonzalez
1Centre for Neuroscience Studies, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Schizophrenia is a chronic and severe mental illness characterized by positive (e.g., delusions and hallucinations) and negative (e.g., reduced motivation, pleasure, and emotional expression) symptoms. Deficits in cognitive abilities are also recognized as a core feature of the disorder (Green et al., 2004; Barch and Ceaser, 2012), and they are a critical determinant of quality of life and daily functioning (Lepage et al., 2014; Strassnig et al., 2015). Although the etiology of schizophrenia is poorly understood, a dominant hypothesis is that the disorder represents the end stage of aberrant neurodevelopmental processes caused by both genetic and environmental factors (Castle and Buckley, 2008; Rapoport et al., 2012). Consistent with this neurodevelopmental model is that first-degree relatives display similar cognitive deficits (Heydebrand, 2006).

Neurochemical explanations of schizophrenia have frequently focused on the dopaminergic system as antipsychotic drugs alleviate positive symptoms by blocking dopamine D2 receptors (Castle and Buckley, 2008). While the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia has been a dominant explanatory model, the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia (Krystal et al., 2003) has received growing attention. This hypothesis stems from observations that blockade of the NMDAR induces schizophrenia-like symptoms in healthy people (Krystal et al., 1994) and worsens the symptoms in people with schizophrenia (Morris et al., 2005). Recent progress in our understanding of the neurobiology of schizophrenia has come from modeling aspects of the cognitive symptoms of the disorder, particularly working memory, using low doses of the NMDAR antagonist ketamine.

Working memory deficits are a debilitating cognitive symptom of schizophrenia and have been linked to hypoactivity in the frontoparietal network (FPN) (Barch and Ceaser, 2012). Imaging studies in healthy people have shown that working memory function is associated with distributed cortical networks (Christophel et al., 2017), with the FPN being activated (Cole et al., 2014) and the default-mode network (DMN) deactivated (Anticevic et al., 2013). Notably, reduced deactivation of the DMN and attenuated anticorrelation between the FPN and the DMN have been observed in people with schizophrenia during working memory task performance (Whitfield-Gabrieli et al., 2009). Moreover, blocking NMDAR with ketamine also reduces DMN deactivation as well as FPN and DMN anticorrelation during working memory tasks (Anticevic et al., 2012). This suggests that disruption of NMDAR in schizophrenia contributes to working memory deficits in this disorder.

Abnormal neural oscillations have also been reported to accompany the working memory deficits observed in schizophrenia. Some studies have linked the pathology to dysfunction of parvalbumin-positive interneurons in the lateral prefrontal cortex (Lewis, 2014), resulting in reduced oscillations at largely higher frequencies (Gonzalez-Burgos et al., 2015). However, reduction in higher-frequency oscillations has not been found in all EEG/MEG studies (Barr et al., 2010; Senkowski and Gallinat, 2015). How ketamine affects neural oscillations during working memory is unknown. However, ketamine administered in other experimental conditions has been observed to increase the power of higher-frequency oscillations and decrease that of lower-frequency oscillations (Hong et al., 2010; Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2015).

In a recent study, Ma et al. (2018) investigated the effects of ketamine on neural synchrony in 3 rhesus monkeys performing a task in which a nonspatial rule had to be retained over a short delay period. Specifically, they examined whether ketamine alters neural oscillations similarly to that observed in people with schizophrenia during working memory tasks. Ma et al. (2018) recorded local field potentials (LFPs) from the lateral prefrontal cortex of the monkeys while they performed a task, in which a central color cue (the rule) instructed them to make either an eye movement to (prosaccade) or away from (antisaccade) a peripheral stimulus presented after a delay period (0.7–1 s). Baseline data were collected during the first 10 min of task performance, and treatment effects were examined for 30 min after a low-dose intramuscular injection of ketamine (or saline as vehicle control).

Ketamine affected task-dependent changes in neural synchrony, as indicated by changes in LFP power. In the baseline condition, neural activity became desynchronized during the task, including the delay period (Ma et al., 2018, their Fig. 3). This was particularly the case for lower-frequency oscillations. After ketamine administration, this task-related desynchronization was attenuated, especially in alpha-band frequencies and for most of the delay period (Ma et al., 2018, their Fig. 3). Ketamine thus disrupted the neural desynchronization normally accompanying the task. Ketamine also affected the trial type information (the task rule: prosaccade or antisaccade) that was encoded in oscillatory power. In the baseline condition, each trial type was associated with oscillations in distinct frequency bands: beta-band power was greater on prosaccade trials, whereas theta- and alpha-band power was greater on antisaccade trials (Ma et al., 2018, their Fig. 5). However, after ketamine administration, the power of these neural oscillations was no longer significant, indicating that ketamine abolished the rule information necessary to perform the task correctly.

How do ketamine perturbations of neural oscillations impact behavior? Ketamine was found to increase the percentage of error responses in the task. To determine whether the increase in error responses after ketamine injection was related to the attenuation of task-related desynchronization in alpha-band oscillations, Ma et al. (2018) repeated the analysis with data from correct responses only. They found that the increase in error responses did not correlate with the effect of ketamine on task-related alpha-band desynchronization, as ketamine also decreased task-related desynchronization in alpha-band frequencies when the animals made correct responses. After computing the difference in LFP power during the delay period between correct and error responses, Ma et al. (2018) found that the LFP power difference between correct and error responses was significantly reduced at beta-band frequencies after ketamine administration (their Fig. 4). This indicates that performance in this task rested on beta-band oscillations, which were vulnerable to ketamine.

The study of Ma et al. (2018) provides insight into the role of NMDAR in neural synchrony that may coordinate distributed neural activities involved in cognitive processes. Their findings complement that of Salazar et al. (2012), who found that working memory content is represented in widespread synchronization across the FPN, dominated by parietal-to-frontal oscillations in the beta-band frequencies. Neural desynchronization is also known to enhance information transmission, and desynchronized lower-frequency oscillations have been particularly associated with the encoding and retrieval of memory content (Hanslmayr et al., 2012; Heinrichs-Graham and Wilson, 2015). Consistent with the finding of Ma et al. (2018) that ketamine attenuated the desynchronization of lower-frequency oscillations, Kang et al. (2018) found that people with schizophrenia have lower desynchrony at beta-band frequencies in the FPN during all phases of a working memory task.

Abnormal neural synchrony is a potential mechanism for functional dysconnectivity (Brennan et al., 2013), the basis of the disconnection hypothesis proposed to explain schizophrenia (Friston et al., 2016) and for which there is increasing evidence. Disrupted brain connectivity in people with schizophrenia has been inferred from structural and physiological changes, which are particularly evident in the connections involving the prefrontal cortex (Fitzsimmons et al., 2013; van den Heuvel and Fornito, 2014). At the network level, functional dysconnectivity could result from attenuated FPN activation and DMN deactivation, which is also seen after ketamine administration (Anticevic et al., 2012). Reduced functional connectivity has also been associated with lower cognitive abilities, including working memory (Bassett et al., 2009; Cole et al., 2011; Repovs et al., 2011). Finally, measures of functional connectivity have been found to be heritable (Mothersill et al., 2012), suggesting a possible genetic basis for these deficits and a link to the neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia. In the study of Ma et al. (2018), ketamine predominantly disrupted oscillations in the beta- and alpha-band frequencies, which tend to sustain long-range synchronization (Uhlhaas and Singer, 2006). The effect of ketamine may thus result from disrupted functional connectivity within the FPN and between the FPN and DMN.

NMDAR and GABAergic interneurons are important for the synchronization of oscillations in the beta- and gamma-band frequencies (Whittington et al., 2000; Uhlhaas and Singer, 2010). Parvalbumin-positive interneurons may be relevant as they have been found to be abnormal in schizophrenia (Lewis, 2014) and have been causally linked to the generation of higher-frequency oscillations (Carlén et al., 2012). Moreover, parvalbumin-positive interneurons may be important for functional connectivity within nodes of the FPN as higher-frequency oscillations have been linked to short-range synchronization, (Uhlhaas and Singer, 2006). These neurons may also be more susceptible to NMDAR blockade with ketamine (Seamans, 2008), as they receive their excitatory inputs through NMDAR (Kinney et al., 2006). The disruptive effect of ketamine on the anticorrelation between the FPN and DMN may be exerted through the same mechanism. Indeed, Anticevic et al. (2012) found in model simulations that this effect could be reproduced by simply reducing NMDAR conductance onto GABAergic interneurons.

Ketamine-treated people are a valuable model to study the cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. Ma et al. (2018) extended this approach to nonhuman primates, validating an animal model to study the underlying neural mechanisms. Extending this approach to study neural synchrony in other nodes of the neurocognitive network could help to provide a comprehensive understanding of schizophrenia.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/preparing-manuscript#journalclub.

  • We thank Dr. Martin Paré for guidance and support on this project.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Mavis Kusi, Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, 18 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada. 9mk11{at}queensu.ca

References

  1. ↵
    1. Anticevic A,
    2. Gancsos M,
    3. Murray JD,
    4. Repovs G,
    5. Driesen NR,
    6. Ennis DJ,
    7. Niciu MJ,
    8. Morgan PT,
    9. Surti TS,
    10. Bloch MH,
    11. Ramani R,
    12. Smith MA,
    13. Wang XJ,
    14. Krystal JH,
    15. Corlett PR
    (2012) NMDA receptor function in large-scale anticorrelated neural systems with implications for cognition and schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:16720–16725. doi:10.1073/pnas.1208494109 pmid:23012427
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Anticevic A,
    2. Repovs G,
    3. Barch DM
    (2013) Working memory encoding and maintenance deficits in schizophrenia: neural evidence for activation and deactivation abnormalities. Schizophr Bull 39:168–178. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbr107 pmid:21914644
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Barch DM,
    2. Ceasar A
    (2012) Cognition in schizophrenia: core psychological and neural mechanisms. Trends Cogn Sci 16:27–34. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.015 pmid:22169777
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Barr MS,
    2. Farzan F,
    3. Tran LC,
    4. Chen R,
    5. Fitzgerald PB,
    6. Daskalakis ZJ
    (2010) Evidence for excessive frontal evoked gamma oscillatory activity in schizophrenia during working memory. Schizophr Res 121:146–152. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.023 pmid:20598857
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bassett DS,
    2. Bullmore ET,
    3. Meyer-Lindenberg A,
    4. Apud JA,
    5. Weinberger DR,
    6. Coppola R
    (2009) Cognitive fitness of cost-efficient brain functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:11747–11752. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903641106 pmid:19564605
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Brennan AM,
    2. Harris AW,
    3. Williams LM
    (2013) Functional dysconnectivity in schizophrenia and its relationship to neural synchrony. Expert Rev Neurother 13:755–765. doi:10.1586/14737175.2013.811899 pmid:23898848
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Carlén M,
    2. Meletis K,
    3. Siegle JH,
    4. Cardin JA,
    5. Futai K,
    6. Vierling-Claassen D,
    7. Ruhlmann C,
    8. Jones SR,
    9. Deisseroth K,
    10. Sheng M,
    11. Moore CI,
    12. Tsai LH
    (2012) A critical role for NMDA receptors in parvalbumin interneurons for gamma rhythm induction and behavior. Mol Psychiatry 17:537–548. doi:10.1038/mp.2011.31 pmid:21468034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Castle DJ,
    2. Buckley PF
    (2008) Schizophrenia (Oxford Psychiatry Library). New York, NY: Oxford UP.
  9. ↵
    1. Christophel TB,
    2. Klink PC,
    3. Spitzer B,
    4. Roelfsema PR,
    5. Haynes JD
    (2017) The distributed nature of working memory. Trends Cogn Sci 21:111–124. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.007 pmid:28063661
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cole MW,
    2. Anticevic A,
    3. Repovs G,
    4. Barch D
    (2011) Variable global dysconnectivity and individual differences in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 70:43–50. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.02.010 pmid:21496789
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Cole MW,
    2. Repovš G,
    3. Anticevic A
    (2014) The frontoparietal cortical system: a central role in mental health. Neuroscientist 20:652–664. doi:10.1177/1073858414525995 pmid:24622818
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Fitzsimmons J,
    2. Kubicki M,
    3. Shenton ME
    (2013) Review of functional and anatomical brain connectivity findings in schizophrenia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 26:172–187. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32835d9e6a pmid:23324948
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Friston K,
    2. Brown HR,
    3. Siemerkus J,
    4. Stephan KE
    (2016) The disconnection hypothesis. Schizophr Res 176:83–94. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.07.014 pmid:27450778
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Gonzalez-Burgos G,
    2. Cho RY,
    3. Lewis DA
    (2015) Alterations in cortical network oscillations and parvalbumin neurons in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 77:1031–1040. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.010 pmid:25863358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Green MF,
    2. Nuechterlein KH,
    3. Gold JM,
    4. Barch DM,
    5. Cohen J,
    6. Essock S,
    7. Fenton WS,
    8. Frese F,
    9. Goldberg TE,
    10. Heaton RK,
    11. Keefe RS,
    12. Kern RS,
    13. Kraemer H,
    14. Stover E,
    15. Weinberger DR,
    16. Zalcman S,
    17. Marder SR
    (2004) Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: the NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria. Biol Psychiatry 56:301–307. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.06.023 pmid:15336511
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Hanslmayr S,
    2. Staudigl T,
    3. Fellner MC
    (2012) Oscillatory power decreases and long-term memory: the information via desynchronization hypothesis. Front Hum Neursci 6:74. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00074 pmid:22514527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Heinrichs-Graham E,
    2. Wilson TW
    (2015) Spatiotemporal oscillatory dynamics during the encoding and maintenance phases of a visual working memory task. Cortex 69:121–130. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.022 pmid:26043156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Heydebrand G
    (2006) Cognitive deficits in the families of patients with schizophrenia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 19:277–281. doi:10.1097/01.yco.0000218598.38807.b0 pmid:16612213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Hong LE,
    2. Summerfelt A,
    3. Buchanan RW,
    4. O'Donnell P,
    5. Thaker GK,
    6. Weiler MA,
    7. Lahti AC
    (2010) Gamma and delta neural oscillations and association with clinical symptoms under subanesthetic ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:632–640. doi:10.1038/npp.2009.168 pmid:19890262
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kang SS,
    2. MacDonald AW 3rd.,
    3. Chafee MV,
    4. Im CH,
    5. Bernat EM,
    6. Davenport ND,
    7. Sponheim SR
    (2018) Abnormal cortical neural synchrony during working memory in schizophrenia. Clin Neurophysiol 129:210–221. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.10.024 pmid:29197736
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Kinney JW,
    2. Davis CN,
    3. Tabarean I,
    4. Conti B,
    5. Bartfai T,
    6. Behrens MM
    (2006) A specific role for NR2A-containing NMDA receptors in the maintenance of parvalbumin and GAD67 immunoreactivity in cultured interneurons. J Neurosci 26:1604–1615. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4722-05.2006 pmid:16452684
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Krystal JH,
    2. Karper LP,
    3. Seibyl JP,
    4. Freeman GK,
    5. Delaney R,
    6. Bremner JD,
    7. Heninger GR,
    8. Bowers MB Jr.,
    9. Charney DS
    (1994) Subanesthetic effects of the non-competitive NMDA antagonist, ketamine, in humans: psychotomimetic, perceptual, cognitive, and neuroendocrine responses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51:199–214. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030035004 pmid:8122957
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Krystal JH,
    2. D'Souza DC,
    3. Mathalon D,
    4. Perry E,
    5. Belger A,
    6. Hoffman R
    (2003) NMDA receptor antagonist effects, cortical glutamatergic function, and schizophrenia: toward a paradigm shift in medication development. Psychopharmacology 169:215–233. doi:10.1007/s00213-003-1582-z pmid:12955285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Lepage M,
    2. Bodnar M,
    3. Bowie CR
    (2014) Neurocognition: clinical and functional outcomes in schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry 59:5–12. doi:10.1177/070674371405900103 pmid:24444318
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Lewis DA
    (2014) Inhibitory neurons in human cortical circuits: substrate for cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Curr Opin Neurobiol 26:22–26. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.11.003 pmid:24650500
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Ma L,
    2. Skoblenick K,
    3. Johnston K,
    4. Everling S
    (2018) Ketamine alters lateral prefrontal oscillations in a rule-based working memory task. J Neurosci 38:2482–2494. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2659-17.2018 pmid:29437929
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Morris BJ,
    2. Cochran SM,
    3. Pratt JA
    (2005) PCP: from pharmacology to modelling schizophrenia. Curr Opin Pharmacol 5:101–106. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2004.08.008 pmid:15661633
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Mothersill O,
    2. Kelly S,
    3. Rose EJ,
    4. Donohoe G
    (2012) The effects of psychosis risk variants on brain connectivity: a review. Front Psychiatry 3:18. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00018 pmid:22416237
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Muthukumaraswamy SD,
    2. Shaw AD,
    3. Jackson LE,
    4. Hall J,
    5. Moran R,
    6. Saxena N
    (2015) Evidence that subanesthetic doses of ketamine cause sustained disruptions of NMDA and AMPA-mediated frontoparietal connectivity in humans. J Neurosci 35:11694–11706. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0903-15.2015 pmid:26290246
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Rapoport JL,
    2. Giedd JN,
    3. Gogtay N
    (2012) Neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia: update 2012. Mol Psychiatry 17:1228–1238. doi:10.1038/mp.2012.23 pmid:22488257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Repovs G,
    2. Csernansky JG,
    3. Barch DM
    (2011) Brain network connectivity in individuals with schizophrenia and their siblings. Biol Psychiatry 69:967–973. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.11.009 pmid:21193174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Salazar RF,
    2. Dotson NM,
    3. Bressler SL,
    4. Gray CM
    (2012) Content-specific fronto-parietal synchronization during visual working memory. Science 338:1097–1100. doi:10.1126/science.1224000 pmid:23118014
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Seamans J
    (2008) Losing inhibition with ketamine. Nat Chem Biol 4:91–93. doi:10.1038/nchembio0208-91 pmid:18202677
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Senkowski D,
    2. Gallinat J
    (2015) Dysfunctional prefrontal gamma-band oscillations reflect working memory and other cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 77:1010–1019. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.034 pmid:25847179
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Strassnig MT,
    2. Raykov T,
    3. O'Gorman C,
    4. Bowie CR,
    5. Sabbag S,
    6. Durand D,
    7. Patterson TL,
    8. Pinkham A,
    9. Penn DL,
    10. Harvey PD
    (2015) Determinants of different aspects of everyday outcome in schizophrenia: the role of negative symptoms, cognition, and functional capacity. Schizophr Res 165:76–82. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2015.03.033 pmid:25868935
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Uhlhaas PJ,
    2. Singer W
    (2006) Neural synchrony in brain disorders: relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology. Neuron 52:155–168. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.020 pmid:17015233
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Uhlhaas PJ,
    2. Singer W
    (2010) Abnormal neural oscillations and synchrony in schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:100–113. doi:10.1038/nrn2774 pmid:20087360
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. van den Heuvel MP,
    2. Fornito A
    (2014) Brain networks in schizophrenia. Neuropsychol Rev 24:32–48. doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9248-7 pmid:24500505
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Whitfield-Gabrieli S,
    2. Thermenos HW,
    3. Milanovic S,
    4. Tsuang MT,
    5. Faraone SV,
    6. McCarley RW,
    7. Shenton ME,
    8. Green AI,
    9. Nieto-Castanon A,
    10. LaViolette P,
    11. Wojcik J,
    12. Gabrieli JD,
    13. Seidman LJ
    (2009) Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:1279–1284. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809141106 pmid:19164577
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Whittington MA,
    2. Traub RD,
    3. Kopell N,
    4. Ermentrout B,
    5. Buhl EH
    (2000) Inhibition-based rhythms: experimental and mathematical observations on network dynamics. Int J Psychophysiol 38:315–336. pmid:11102670
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 38 (34)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 38, Issue 34
22 Aug 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Modeling Schizophrenia's Abnormal Cortical Neural Synchrony in Monkeys
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Modeling Schizophrenia's Abnormal Cortical Neural Synchrony in Monkeys
Mavis Kusi, Gregory Brooks, Jarrett Noakes, Enis Hasekiu, Jorge Enrique Ingle Gonzalez
Journal of Neuroscience 22 August 2018, 38 (34) 7375-7377; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1152-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Modeling Schizophrenia's Abnormal Cortical Neural Synchrony in Monkeys
Mavis Kusi, Gregory Brooks, Jarrett Noakes, Enis Hasekiu, Jorge Enrique Ingle Gonzalez
Journal of Neuroscience 22 August 2018, 38 (34) 7375-7377; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1152-18.2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Parabrachial Projections to PAG-RVM Axis May Promote Placebo Hypoalgesia and Nocebo Hyperalgesia
  • Differential Dopamine Dynamics in Adolescents and Adults
  • Complementing Neuroregeneration: Deciphering the Role of Neuro-Immune Interactions in CNS Repair
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.