Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Cover ArticleSymposium and Mini-Symposium

New observations in neuroscience using superresolution microscopy

Michihiro Igarashi, Motohiro Nozumi, Ling-Gang Wu, Francesca Cella Zanacchi, István Katona, László Barna, Pingyong Xu, Mingshu Zhang, Fudong Xue and Edward Boyden
Journal of Neuroscience 31 October 2018, 38 (44) 9459-9467; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1678-18.2018
Michihiro Igarashi
1Department of Neurochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine, Niigata 951-8510, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tarokaja@med.niigata-u.ac.jp
Motohiro Nozumi
1Department of Neurochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine, Niigata 951-8510, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Motohiro Nozumi
Ling-Gang Wu
2National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland 20892,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesca Cella Zanacchi
3Department of Nanophysics, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova 16163, Italy,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
István Katona
4Momentum Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Molecular and Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest 1083, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for István Katona
László Barna
5Nikon Center of Excellence for Neuronal Imaging, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for László Barna
Pingyong Xu
6Key Laboratory of Noncoding RNA, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,
7Beijing Key Laboratory of Noncoding RNA, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China,
8University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mingshu Zhang
6Key Laboratory of Noncoding RNA, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,
7Beijing Key Laboratory of Noncoding RNA, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fudong Xue
6Key Laboratory of Noncoding RNA, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,
7Beijing Key Laboratory of Noncoding RNA, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Boyden
9Department of Biological Engineering and Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Media Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Superresolution microscopy (SM) techniques are among the revolutionary methods for molecular and cellular observations in the 21st century. SM techniques overcome optical limitations, and several new observations using SM lead us to expect these techniques to have a large impact on neuroscience in the near future. Several types of SM have been developed, including structured illumination microscopy (SIM), stimulated emission depletion microscopy (STED), and photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM)/stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), each with special features. In this Minisymposium, experts in these different types of SM discuss the new structural and functional information about specific important molecules in neuroscience that has been gained with SM. Using these techniques, we have revealed novel mechanisms of endocytosis in nerve growth, fusion pore dynamics, and described quantitative new properties of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Additional powerful techniques, including single molecule-guided Bayesian localization SM (SIMBA) and expansion microscopy (ExM), alone or combined with super-resolution observation, are also introduced in this session.

Introduction

The molecular diversity inherent in brain is much larger than in other organs. For example, molecular and cellular neuroscience techniques have revealed a multitude of synapse-associated proteins that shape basic neuronal transmission. To understand the precise roles of these proteins, knowledge of the localization and positional relationships is essential. Unfortunately, the diffraction limit of conventional optical microscopy (∼200 nm) precludes analyses of such information, because neuronal structural components are highly compressed within the narrow areas of synapses. In this Minisymposium, experts describe their experiences with innovative devices for super-resolution microscopy (SM) devised in the this century. We also introduce two additional associated techniques. These methods all use different principles to overcome optical limitations of conventional microscopy and are as described below.

Structured illumination microscopy (SIM).

SIM can reconstruct the fine structure of cells by calculating the interference (moiré) patterns induced by irradiation with striped-pattern excitation light (Gustafsson, 2000). With SIM, approximately 100 nm in lateral dimensions and 300 nm in the axial dimension can be visualized. Super-resolution images are easy to obtain with SIM, as it utilizes typical fluorescent dyes (Demmerle et al., 2017; Richter et al., 2018).

Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy (Hell and Wichmann, 1994).

A typical single-point scanning STED microscope superimposes the excitation beam with a doughnut-shaped STED beam to instantly quench molecules at the periphery of the excitation spot, thereby confining fluorescence emission to the doughnut center (Hell, 2007). This method of saturated quenching produces a fluorescent spot far below the diffraction limit to yield a subdiffraction resolution image. As a result, STED microscopy offers high temporal and spatial resolution (Hell, 2007), reaching approximately 60 nm every 26 ms as described in a study of fusion pore dynamics (Shin et al., 2018).

Stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM)/photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM).

In PALM, individual fluorescent protein molecules are repeatedly photoactivated with a low-intensity light, imaged, and photobleached (Shcherbakova et al., 2014). The super-resolution image in PALM is reconstructed by merging all the localized single-molecule positions. PALM imaging combined with clustering analyses can be used to investigate in a more quantitative manner the scaffold protein distribution at the molecular level.

Single molecule-guided Bayesian localization (SIMBA) SM: Three remarkable advantages of SIMBA are its (i) exceptional spatial (50 nm) and temporal (0.5 s/image) resolution, (ii) large field of view, and (iii) applicability for long-term live-cell imaging.

Expansion microscopy (ExM): Whereas current SM methods are difficult to apply to large or thick three-dimensional specimens, ExM uses the isotropic swelling of a dense, crosslinked polymer network of polyelectrolyte hydrogel materials to which key biomolecules or labels (e.g., GFP, antibodies) are covalently anchored. The addition of water to the preserved specimen causes the hydrogel to swell enormously (∼4.5× in linear extent or ∼100× in volume) (Chen et al., 2015; Chang et al., 2017; Karagiannis and Boyden, 2018).

In the sections below, we describe some novel insights gained by using these revolutionary methods as well as recent advances that strengthen SM techniques.

SIM reveals associations between F-actin organization and membrane trafficking in growth cones

Growth cones are highly motile structures at the tips of growing axons during neuronal development and regeneration. They guide axon growth via chemotaxis and they form synapses after reaching a target (Lowery and Van Vactor, 2009). The thick area of the central domain of growth cones is rich in microtubule and organelle, whereas the peripheral domain, comprising F-actin, is thinner (Fig. 1). In the peripheral domain, branched F-actin constructs a sheet-like protrusion, called a lamellipodium, while unbranched filaments bundle together to form a slender protrusion, called a filopodium, at the growth cone's leading edge. To better understand the molecular basis of neuronal growth, the precise relationship between F-actin and the plasma membrane must be defined. However, there has been little progress despite the 3D elucidation of the growth cone structure, because the peripheral domain is small and thin (<1 μm).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

SIM reveals intracellular 3D distributions of individual actin filaments and vesicles labeled with GFP-synaptophysin in growth cones. (A) Left, F-actin (magenta) and GFP-synaptophysin (GFP-Syp; green) in a glutaraldehyde-fixed growth cone of a neuroblastoma NG108–15 cell. Right, enlarged image of the region marked by the dashed box on the left. The focus plane on the right was 330 nm higher than on the left, which focuses on the bottom of the growth cone. The GFP-Syp signals were detected in the vicinity of the filopodia (arrows in the left panel) and actin bundles (arrowheads in the right panel). (B) Color maps repsenting the height of F-actin from the substrate, in the growth cone shown in (A). Note that the central (C-) domain is obviously thicker than the peripheral (P-) domain. Most actin bundles are red in the C-domain, indicating that they are farther from the substrate. The color/height gradually decreases from the C-domain to the leading edge, suggesting that F-actin bundles are distributed along the dorsal/apical surface, but not along the basal surface, in the growth cone (Nozumi and Igarashi, 2017) (C) Color maps representing the height of GFP-Syp from the substrate in the growth cone shown in (A). By comparing the color map of GFP-Syp with that of F-actin, it is possible to determine which Syp-positive vesicles were close to F-actin bundles, which side of the bundle they were on, and what shape they have (arrowheads in the right panel). (D) SIM images of GFP-Syp accumulation coinciding with F-actin bundling (arrows). The 3D-SIM and live imaging showed Syp assembled in the vicinity of F-actin bundles at the leading edge (Nozumi et al., 2017). Arrowheads: three actin bundles forming into a thicker filopodium.

Using SIM, we examined the precise localization of ∼100 proteins identified by proteomic analysis of mammalian growth cone (Nozumi et al., 2009, 2017) (Fig. 1). Our analysis suggested that the bundling of F-actin is linked with local endocytosis at the leading edge (Nozumi et al., 2017). The observation of growth cones by 3D-SIM showed novel 3D intracellular structures and associations that could not be imaged with sufficient resolution using conventional confocal microscopy.

STED imaging reveals hemifusion and fusion pore dynamics in live cells

Fusion is thought to occur through two mechanisms: the merging of the proximal leaflets of two bilayers (hemi-fusion), followed by distal leaflets to open a pore, or alternatively, by the formation of a protein-lined pore followed by the merging of lipid bilayers (Wu et al., 2014). The intense debate between these two hypotheses has recently been resolved with STED microscopy at live cells(Chiang et al., 2014; Wen et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2016). Bovine chromaffin cells were transfected with EGFP or mNeonGreen attached to phospholipase CΔ PH domain (PH) which labels the cytosolic-facing leaflet of the plasma membrane (PM). With Atto 532 (A532) is in the bath, fusion generates PH-labeled Ω-profiles containing A532 spots, due to PH diffusion in the membrane and A532 diffusion in the solution (Fig. 2A). PH-labeled Ω-profiles can appear at the same time as the A532 spot or appear alone without A532 spot (Fig. 2A–C) These results indicate that hemi-fusion (PM and vesicular cytosolic-facing leaflet fusion) is the first step to fusion(Zhao et al., 2016).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Visualizing the dynamics of hemi-fusion, fusion pore opening and vesicular-content release with STED microscopy. (A–C) STED XZ images PH (green, labeling inner leaflet) and A532 (red, in the bath) (A, PH and A532 appear in the W-profile at the same time), PH-earlier (B, PH appears before A532, indicating hemi-fusion, and A532 appears later, indicating fusion pore has opened. (C) Ω-profile labeled with PH only, indicating hemi-fusion. Labeled times are relative to depol1s onset. Cytosol, PM, bath, and coverslip location are labeled in A. (D) STED XZ images of PH and A532 taken at 50-nm intervals along the Y-axis, showing a W-profile with a visible pore (Porev). (E) Upper left, W-profile at Y=250 nm from panel D; upper right, the fluorescence profile of the dotted line across the pore with WH (full-width-half-maximum) labelled. Lower, XY images reconstructed from panel D at a Z-focal plane across the pore (dotted line in upper panel). Inset, drawing of reconstructed plane (gray). (F) PH-labelled W-profile fluorescence (FPH, normalized to baseline), A532 spot fluorescence (F532), Porev WH, and sampled images at times indicated with lines showing a pore undergoing rapid opening and slow constriction. (G) Left, PH and dynamin 2-mTurquoise2 (Dyn2, pseudo-color) XZ-images at different Y-axis location showing dynamin surrounding the pore. Right, XY-reconstructed images across the pore (dotted line). (H–I) Pore-dynamics control content release: FPH, FFFN (FFN511 fluorescence), and PH/FFN511 images for Ω-profile with Porev (H) or without a visible pore (PorenoV, I).

Fusion opens a pore to release transmitters and the rate of opening controls the rate of release. However, fusion pore has not been observed in live cells. The regulatory mechanisms are thus poorly understood. STED microscopy of PH/A532 in live chromaffin cells revealed dynamic fusion pore containing 180–720 nm vesicles revealed dynamic fusion pore behaviors, including opening, expansion, constriction, and closure of 0–490 nm pores within 26 ms to seconds (Fig. 2D–G)(Shin et al., 2018). These dynamic pore behaviors determine the rate of release of vesicular contents, such as the fluorescent false neurotransmitter 511 (FFN511) or neuropeptide Y-EGFP (Fig. 2H–I)(Shin et al., 2018). Dynamic pore behaviors are generated by competition between pore expansion mediated by F-actin-dependent tension and constriction mediated by calcium/dynamin(Shin et al., 2018). These findings provide the missing live-cell evidence proving the fusion-pore hypothesis, and establish a live-cell dynamic-pore theory accounting for fusion, fission and the regulation of these processes (Chiang et al., 2014; Shin et al., 2018).

SM for the study of GABAergic synaptic plasticity at the single-molecule level

Postsynaptic scaffolding proteins are key factors for the functional organization of synapses, and the mobility of the neurotransmitter receptors, with which these scaffolding molecules interact. At inhibitory synapses, gephyrin is present at a 1:1 ratio with receptors (Specht et al., 2013), suggesting that changes in gephyrin clustering may alter the number of receptors at the synapse and thus the strength of synaptic transmission. During inhibitory long-term potentiation induced by chemical stimulation, gephyrin redistributes from extrasynaptic to synaptic areas, thereby enhancing the clustering of synaptic GABAA receptors (Petrini et al., 2014). STORM is ideal for investigating single-molecule localization at the nanoscale level including the reorganization and distribution of synaptic receptors, such as GABAA receptors (Fig. 3A), and scaffold proteins (Pennacchietti et al., 2017), such as gephyrin (Fig. 3B), under conditions of plasticity. For more quantitative investigations of scaffold protein distribution, PALM imaging has recently been combined with clustering analyses showing the formation of gephyrin nanodomains at the synapse (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

STORM Superresolution imaging of gephyrin scaffold proteins. Dual color STORM imaging of gephyrin associated with GABAA receptors (A, inset) and the pre-synaptic marker VGAT (B, inset). Conventional and STORM images of Gephyrin stained with Alexa647 along with either GABAAR α1-subunit (left panel) or v-GAT (right panel) stained with Atto520. Scale bar 2 μm (A) (B). Axial dimension of the box 2 μm (inset). Representation of gephyrin local density (radius ∼15nm) reveals the nanoscale organization of synaptic gephyrin in mono-spot and multi-spot clusters (C). Scale bars, 100 nm. Image adapted from Pennacchietti et al. (2017). Sample credit: A. Barberis (Italian Institute of Technology).

Nanoscale molecular imaging in brain circuits by STORM superresolution imaging

STORM superresolution imaging has been used to demonstrate that the chemical synapse can be divided into functionally distinct nanodomains at both the presynaptic and postsynaptic sides (Dani et al., 2010; MacGillavry et al., 2013; Nair et al., 2013; Specht et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2016; Sakamoto et al., 2018). We recently combined STORM superresolution imaging and confocal microscopy to measure molecular distributions at the nanoscale level in selected cells and in identified subcellular compartments (Fig. 4, 5; Dudok et al., 2015; Barna et al., 2016). A major advantage of combining confocal and STORM imaging is that it permits the study of molecular targets that are present abundant throughout tissues, but present in limited quantitites within the selected target cells and subcellular domains. This ability is due to the single-molecule nature of STORM imaging, which contributes to a substantially improved signal-to-noise ratio. This is an especially advantageous for distinguishing low intensity, but specific immunofluorescence labeling from the high autofluorescence background usually present in brain sections. By exploiting these advantages of correlated STORM and confocal microscopy, we recently to demonstrated the presence of ribosomes in the axon terminals of specific GABAergic interneuron types (Younts et al., 2016).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Combination of patch-clamp electrophysiology, confocal microscopy and STORM superresolution imaging. Visualization of individual target cells via biocytin injection during in vitro patch-clamp electrophysiological recording or during in vivo juxtacellular recording allows the correlated investigation of physiological, anatomical and nanoscale molecular parameters from the very same neuron within intact brain circuits. (A) The representative voltage trace shows action potential firing of a hippocampal GABAergic interneuron recorded in the CA1 subfield of the mouse hippocampus. Note the regular spiking pattern, which is a typical physiological hallmark of CB1 cannabinoid receptor-positive interneurons. (B) The neuron was filled with biocytin via the patch electrode during electrophysiological recording. Maximum intensity projection of the confocal image reveals the characteristic multipolar dendritic morphology of the interneuron, whereas the thin axons and the axon terminals are primarily restricted to the pyramidal layer. (C) The quantitative evaluation of the laminar bouton distribution confirms the identity of the cell as a perisomatically-targeting interneuron a.k.a. basket cell. Note that the vast majority of measured axonal varicosities (n = 2168) are located in the stratum pyramidale, whereas very few boutons are found in strata oriens and radiatum. The value “0” indicates the middle of the stratum pyramidale as reference point. (D) High-magnification confocal image of three axon terminals of the biocytin-filled basket cell. Terminals of the biocytin-filled basket cell. (E) STORM image of CB1 receptor-immunostaining aligned with the confocal image of the biocytin-labeled axon demonstrates that most receptors are concentrated on the axon terminals of this GABAergic interneuron. (F) The vast majority of the STORM localization points representing CB1 receptors are accumulated along the contour of the bouton in accordance with the ubiquitous plasma membrane distribution of the receptor. [Modified from Dudok et al. 2015; figure kindly prepared by Dr. Barna Dudok].

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Handling nanoscale molecular information: Illustration by Visual Molecular Dynamics and data analysis by VividSTORM. (A) STORM super-resolution imaging generated localization points, which represent CB1 cannabinoid receptors visualized by immunofluorescence staining. These localizations all belong to a single GABAergic axon terminal imaged in the CA1 subfield of the hippocampus. Note that other CB1 receptor-representing localizations belonging to neighboring cellular and subcellular profiles have been excluded from the image for clarity (see Fig. 4 for further details). The individual molecular localizations are illustrated as atoms with the help of the Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) software. The color depth encodes the z position of the receptor. All subsequent data analysis were performed by the VividSTORM software. (B) A convex hull was fitted onto the outermost STORM localizations (which become vertices) to approximate the plasma membrane of the axon terminals by exploiting the fact that CB1 receptors are densely and homogeneously cover the surface of GABAergic boutons. Chemical bonds in VMD are used to illustrate the convex hull edges. (C) The distance of each receptor localizations can be measured from the convex hull faces. Yellow and magenta STORM localizations separate CB1 receptors along the surface or below the convex hull (80 nm). (D) Receptor density analysis is performed by selecting CB1 STORM localizations (yellow) and measuring randomly distributed reference points (little green dots) within a certain radius (large yellow sphere) of respective CB1 localizations. (E) Yellow STORM localizations depict the CB1 localizations constructing the convex hull. A single presynaptic active zone is visualized by STORM imaging of bassoon-immunostaining (cyan STORM localizations). Because bassoon is located ∼80 nm below the plasma membrane, the STORM localizations representing bassoon coordinates are projected onto the convex hull surface (red STORM localizations) to estimate the active zone position on the axon terminal membrane. (F) Orange lines running along the surface of the convex hull link CB1 receptors (yellow STORM localizations) with the closest localization on the active zone (red STORM localizations) providing an estimation of the nanoscale distance between the regulatory receptors and the location of their molecular effectors known to be present within the active zone. (G) CB1-containing GABAergic interneuron terminals form complex synapses and therefore carry multiple active zones. Visualization of all bassoon localizations (cyan STORM localizations) indeed suggest the presence of more than one bassoon cluster. (H) In this particular bouton, 4 bassoon clusters (cyan, pink, orange and red localizations) were identified by DBSCAN, whereas other bassoon localizations identified as noise are depicted as magenta dots. Scale bar is 200 nm; STORM localizations are shown as 17 nm spheres.

STORM imaging in combination with other microscopy methods and electrophysiological technologies will contribute to a better understanding of the cell-type-and subcellular compartment-specific nanoscale molecular principles, which govern synaptic and other signaling mechanisms in brain circuits (German et al., 2017). In addition, STORM will help us understand the specific molecular changes underlying normal and abnormal plasticity processes in the brain.

SIMBA SM

Previously, we combined single-molecule localization and Bayesian analysis of blinking and bleaching to develop a new superresolution technique called SIMBA (Xu et al., 2017). This technique was used to examine the endoplasmic reticulum, an expansive and dynamic organelle comprising two types of structures, interconnected tubules and flattened sheets, according to models supported by conventional fluorescent microscopy. However, endoplasmic reticulum super-resolution images reconstructed by SIMBA clearly show that the structures that appear as sheets by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy are actually dense tubules surrounded by large empty areas (Fig. 6). The results are highly consistent with those of recent works by Lippincott-Schwartz and Blackstone (Nixon-Abell et al., 2016) in which a combination of five super-resolution technologies were used to demonstrate that “many structures previously proposed to be flat membrane sheets are instead densely packed tubular arrays.” SIMBA imaging can clearly resolve mature clathrin-coated pits as hollow rings (Fig. 7), whereas a recently developed technique utilizing superresolution radial fluctuations (SRRF) could not (Figure 7B, yellow boxes). As SIMBA requires fewer raw frames and is relatively insensitive to background fluorescence, it holds great potential for SR imaging of thick samples, such as brain slices, tissues and organisms in neuroscience with high spatial-temporal resolution.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

SIMBA analysis of endoplasmic reticulum structures in COS7 cells. A, Overlay of 200 total internal reflection fluorescence image frames representing diffraction-limit image of ER-Tracker Red-labeled endoplasmic reticulum. B, Reconstructed SIMBA SR image of the same structure. Rectangle indicates the sheet structure. Scale bars: 2 μm.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

SIMBA imaging of clathrin-coated pits in a live HeLa cell. (A) Overlay of 100 total internal reflection fluorescence image frames representing diffraction-limit image of mEos3.2- clathrin light chain (CLC). (B) Reconstructed super-resolution radial fluctuations image of mEos3.2-CLC. (C) Reconstructed SIMBA image of mEos3.2-CLC. Scale bars: 1 μm. (D), (E), and (F): Zoomed-in images of clathrin-coated pits (CCPs) marked by yellow boxes in (A), (B), and, (C) respectively. Scale bars: 200 nm.

ExM

Following the initial discovery that it was possible to isotropically swell a preserved biological specimen through hydrogel embedding, mechanical homogenization, and water swelling (Chen et al., 2015), three independent groups showed how to bind off-the-shelf chemicals to proteins, including labels such as GFP and fluorescent antibodies (Chozinski et al., 2016; Ku et al., 2016; Tillberg et al., 2016). These protein-retention forms of ExM have been applied to visualize a variety of proteins within synapses, axons, dendrites, and glia in brains of species ranging from Drosophila to mice and to humans. Given much interest in neural circuit tracing, or connectomics, ExM protocols have also been developed to enable mRNAs to be anchored to the swellable polymer, expanded away from each other, and then visualized with fluorescent in situ hybridization, a method in which individual molecules (i.e., mRNAs) are difficult to discern within thick intact tissues (Chen et al., 2015). Going forward, new kinds of polymer chemistry may enable even finer scale visualization, and new kinds of microscopes and algorithms may enable scalable imaging and analysis of increasingly large datasets from the brain, providing spatial precision across large-scale structures (Fig. 8).

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

ExM of mouse brain circuitry. The expansion of the Brainbow-expressing mouse hippocampus. A, Low-magnification widefield fluorescence imaging showing immunostained mouse hippocampus expressing virally delivered Brainbow3.0. B, Postexpansion widefield image of the sample in panel A. C, Maximum-intensity projection of high-resolution confocal microscopy stack following expansion of membrane-labeled Brainbow3.0 neurons from the boxed region in panel B. D, Pre-expansion confocal image showing one optical section of the boxed region in panel C. E, Postexpansion image of the same boxed region. ExM enables fine processes such as axons, which are not easily distinguished in dense neural circuitry (D), to be easily distinguished and traced (E). Scale bars: A, 500 μm; B, 500 μm (1,980 μm physical size); C, 5 μm; D, 5 μm (19.8 μm physical size), and E, 50 μm (198 μm physical size). Adapted from Tillberg et al. (2016).

Discussion and Conclusions

Since SM was first applied to neuroscience (Kittel et al., 2006; Willig et al., 2006; see also Tønnesen and Nägerl, 2013), more than ten years have passed. During this time, in addition to the results which we describe here, some of the important progress, such as the new structure of the axon initial segment (Xu et al., 2013) or the new methodology of the observation of living extracellular space in brain (Tønnesen et al., 2018), have been reported. SM enables precise visualization of endocytosis and exocytosis and quantitation of synaptic receptors, with further advances possible with new methods such as SIMBA and ExM. SM should not be used for the simple confirmation of views derived from electron microscopy. Rather, SM can be used to unmask and resolve molecular structures and dynamics in physiological and pathological events. From this Minisymposium, we hope more neuroscientists will utilize these technologies, first to identify such events that cannot be observed in conventional microscopic fields and then to establish revolutionary concepts.

Footnotes

  • Acknowledgments: M.I, L-G.W., F.C.Z., I.K., P.X., and E.B. thank our lab members for support. F.C.Z. acknowledge A. Barberis and the lab of Synaptic Plasticity of Inhibitory Networks at the Italian Institute of Technology for fruitful collaboration.

  • ↵*To whom correspondence should be addressed: Michihiro Igarashi, MD, PhD, Department of Neurochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan. tarokaja{at}med.niigata-u.ac.jp

References

  1. ↵
    1. Barna L,
    2. Dudok B,
    3. Miczán V,
    4. Horváth A,
    5. László ZI,
    6. Katona I
    (2016) Correlated confocal and super-resolution imaging by VividSTORM. Nat Protoc 11:163–183. doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.002 pmid:26716705
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Chang J-B,
    2. Chen F,
    3. Yoon Y-G,
    4. Jung EE,
    5. Babcock H,
    6. Kang J,
    7. Asano S,
    8. Suk H-J,
    9. Pak N,
    10. Tillberg PW,
    11. Wassie AT,
    12. Cai D,
    13. Boyden ES
    (2017) Iterative expansion microscopy. Nat Methods 14:593–599. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4261 pmid:28417997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Chen F,
    2. Tillberg PW,
    3. Boyden ES
    (2015) Expansion microscopy. Science 347:543–548. doi:10.1126/science.1260088
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Chiang HC,
    2. Shin W,
    3. Zhao WD,
    4. Hamid E,
    5. Sheng J,
    6. Baydyuk M,
    7. Wen PJ,
    8. Jin A,
    9. Momboisse F,
    10. Wu LG
    (2014) Post-fusion structural changes and their roles in exocytosis and endocytosis of dense-core vesicles. Nat Commun 5:3356. doi:10.1038/ncomms4356
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Chozinski TJ,
    2. Halpern AR,
    3. Okawa H,
    4. Kim H-J,
    5. Tremel GJ,
    6. Wong ROL,
    7. Vaughan JC
    (2016) Expansion microscopy with conventional antibodies and fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods 13:485–485. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3833
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Dani A,
    2. Huang B,
    3. Bergan J,
    4. Dulac C,
    5. Zhuang X
    (2010) Superresolution imaging of chemical synapses in the brain. Neuron 68:843–856. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.021 pmid:21144999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Demmerle J,
    2. Innocent C,
    3. North AJ,
    4. Ball G,
    5. Müller M,
    6. Miron E,
    7. Matsuda A,
    8. Dobbie IM,
    9. Markaki Y,
    10. Schermelleh L
    (2017) Strategic and practical guidelines for successful structured illumination microscopy. Nat Protoc 12:988–1010. pmid:28406496
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Dudok B,
    2. Barna L,
    3. Ledri M,
    4. Szabó SI,
    5. Szabadits E,
    6. Pintér B,
    7. Woodhams SG,
    8. Henstridge CM,
    9. Balla GY,
    10. Nyilas R,
    11. Varga C,
    12. Lee SH,
    13. Matolcsi M,
    14. Cervenak J,
    15. Kacskovics I,
    16. Watanabe M,
    17. Sagheddu C,
    18. Melis M,
    19. Pistis M,
    20. Soltesz I,
    21. Katona I
    (2015) Cell-specific STORM super-resolution imaging reveals nanoscale organization of cannabinoid signaling. Nat Neurosci 18:75–86. doi:10.1038/nn.3892 pmid:25485758
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. German CL,
    2. Gudheti MV,
    3. Fleckenstein AE,
    4. Jorgensen EM
    (2017) Brain slice staining and preparation for three-dimensional super-resolution microscopy. Methods Mol Biol 1663:153–162. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7265-4_13 pmid:28924666
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gustafsson MGL
    (2000) Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. J Microsc 198:82–87. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00710.x pmid:10810003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Hell SW,
    2. Wichmann J
    (1994) Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt Lett 19:780–782. pmid:19844443
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Hell SW
    (2007) Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science 316:1153–1158. doi:10.1126/science.1137395 pmid:17525330
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Karagiannis E,
    2. Boyden E
    (2018) Expansion microscopy: development and neuroscience applications. Curr Opin Neurobiol 50:56–63. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2017.12.012 pmid:29316506
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kittel RJ,
    2. Wichmann C,
    3. Rasse TM,
    4. Fouquet W,
    5. Schmidt M,
    6. Schmid A,
    7. Wagh DA,
    8. Pawlu C,
    9. Kellner RR,
    10. Willig KI,
    11. Hell SW,
    12. Buchner E,
    13. Heckmann M,
    14. Sigrist SJ
    (2006) Bruchpilot promotes active zone assembly, Ca2+ channel clustering, and vesicle release. Science 312:1051–1054. doi:10.1126/science.1126308 pmid:16614170
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Ku T,
    2. Swaney J,
    3. Park J-Y,
    4. Albanese A,
    5. Murray E,
    6. Cho JH,
    7. Park Y-G,
    8. Mangena V,
    9. Chen J,
    10. Chung K
    (2016) Multiplexed and scalable super-resolution imaging of three-dimensional protein localization in size-adjustable tissues. Nat Biotechnol 34:973–981. doi:10.1038/nbt.3641
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Lowery LA,
    2. Van Vactor D
    (2009) The trip of the tip: understanding the growth cone machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:332–343. doi:10.1038/nrm2679 pmid:19373241
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. MacGillavry HD,
    2. Song Y,
    3. Raghavachari S,
    4. Blanpied TA
    (2013) Nanoscale scaffolding domains within the postsynaptic density concentrate synaptic AMPA receptors. Neuron 78:615–622. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.009 pmid:23719161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Nair D,
    2. Hosy E,
    3. Petersen JD,
    4. Constals A,
    5. Giannone G,
    6. Choquet D,
    7. Sibarita JB
    (2013) Super-resolution imaging reveals that AMPA receptors inside synapses are dynamically organized in nanodomains regulated by PSD95. J Neurosci 33:13204–13224. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2381-12.2013 pmid:23926273
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Nixon-Abell J,
    2. Obara CJ,
    3. Weigel AV,
    4. Li D,
    5. Legant WR,
    6. Xu CS,
    7. Pasolli HA,
    8. Harvey K,
    9. Hess HF,
    10. Betzig E,
    11. Blackstone C,
    12. Lippincott-Schwartz J
    (2016) Increased spatiotemporal resolution reveals highly dynamic dense tubular matrices in the peripheral ER. Science 354:aaf3928. doi:10.1126/science.aaf3928 pmid:27789813
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Nozumi M,
    2. Togano T,
    3. Takahashi-Niki K,
    4. Lu J,
    5. Honda A,
    6. Taoka M,
    7. Shinkawa T,
    8. Koga H,
    9. Takeuchi K,
    10. Isobe T,
    11. Igarashi M
    (2009) Identification of functional marker proteins in the mammalian growth cone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:17211–17216. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904092106 pmid:19805073
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Nozumi M,
    2. Igarashi M
    (2017) Vesicular movements in the growth cone. Neurochem Int:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2017.09.011 pmid:28962923
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Nozumi M,
    2. Nakatsu F,
    3. Katoh K,
    4. Igarashi M
    (2017) Coordinated movement of vesicles and actin bundles during nerve growth revealed by super-resolution microscopy. Cell Rep 18:2203–2216. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.008 pmid:28249165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Pennacchietti F,
    2. Vascon S,
    3. Nieus T,
    4. Rosillo C,
    5. Das S,
    6. Tyagarajan SK,
    7. Diaspro A,
    8. Del Bue A,
    9. Petrini EM,
    10. Barberis A,
    11. Cella Zanacchi F
    (2017) Nanoscale molecular reorganization of the inhibitory postsynaptic density is a determinant of GABAergic synaptic potentiation. J Neurosci 37:1747–1756. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0514-16.2016 pmid:28073939
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Petrini EM,
    2. Ravasenga T,
    3. Hausrat TJ,
    4. Iurilli G,
    5. Olcese U,
    6. Racine V,
    7. Sibarita JB,
    8. Jacob TC,
    9. Moss SJ,
    10. Benfenati F,
    11. Medini P,
    12. Kneussel M,
    13. Barberis A
    (2014) Synaptic recruitment of gephyrin regulates surface GABAA receptor dynamics for the expression of inhibitory LTP. Nat Commun 5:3921. doi:10.1038/ncomms4921
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Richter KN,
    2. Revelo NH,
    3. Seitz KJ,
    4. Helm MS,
    5. Sarkar D,
    6. Saleeb RS,
    7. D'Este E,
    8. Eberle J,
    9. Wagner E,
    10. Vogl C,
    11. Lazaro DF,
    12. Richter F,
    13. Coy-Vergara J,
    14. Coceano G,
    15. Boyden ES,
    16. Duncan RR,
    17. Hell SW,
    18. Lauterbach MA,
    19. Lehnart SE,
    20. Moser T,
    21. Outeiro TF,
    22. Rehling P,
    23. Schwappach B,
    24. Testa I,
    25. Zapiec B,
    26. Rizzoli SO
    (2018) Glyoxal as an alternative fixative to formaldehyde in immunostaining and super-resolution microscopy. EMBO J 37: 139–159. doi:10.15252/embj.201695709 pmid:29146773
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Sakamoto H,
    2. Ariyoshi T,
    3. Kimpara N,
    4. Sugao K,
    5. Taiko I,
    6. Takikawa K,
    7. Asanuma D,
    8. Namiki S,
    9. Hirose K
    (2018) Synaptic weight set by Munc13–1 supramolecular assemblies. Nat Neurosci 21:41–49. doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0041-9 pmid:29230050
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Shcherbakova DM,
    2. Sengupta P,
    3. Lippincott-Schwartz J,
    4. Verkhusha VV
    (2014) Photocontrollable fluorescent proteins for superresolution imaging. Annu Rev Biophys 43:303–329. doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-051013-022836 pmid:24895855
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Shin W,
    2. Ge L,
    3. Arpino G,
    4. Villarreal SA,
    5. Hamid E,
    6. Liu H,
    7. Zhao WD,
    8. Wen PJ,
    9. Chiang HC,
    10. Wu LG
    (2018) Visualization of membrane pore in live cells reveals a dynamic-pore theory governing fusion and endocytosis. Cell 173:934–945.e12. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.062 pmid:29606354
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Specht CG,
    2. Izeddin I,
    3. Rodriguez PC,
    4. El Beheiry M,
    5. Rostaing P,
    6. Darzacq X,
    7. Dahan M,
    8. Triller
    (2013) A quantitative nanoscopy of inhibitory synapses: counting gephyrin molecules and receptor binding sites. Neuron 79:308–321. pmid:23889935
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Tang AH,
    2. Chen H,
    3. Li TP,
    4. Metzbower SR,
    5. MacGillavry HD,
    6. Blanpied TA
    (2016) A trans-synaptic nanocolumn aligns neurotransmitter release to receptors. Nature 536: 210–214. doi:10.1038/nature19058 pmid:27462810
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Tillberg PW,
    2. Chen F,
    3. Piatkevich KD,
    4. Zhao Y,
    5. Yu C-C (Jay);
    6. English BP,
    7. Gao L,
    8. Martorell A,
    9. Suk H-J,
    10. Yoshida F,
    11. Ellen M,
    12. DeGennaro DHR,
    13. Gong G,
    14. Seneviratne U,
    15. Tannenbaum SR,
    16. Desimone R,
    17. Cai D,
    18. Boyden ES
    (2016) Protein-retention expansion microscopy of cells and tissues labeled using standard fluorescent proteins and antibodies. Nature Biotechnology 34:987–992. doi:10.1038/nbt.3625 pmid:27376584
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Tønnesen J,
    2. Nägerl UV
    (2013) Superresolution imaging for neuroscience. Exp Neurol 242:33–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Tønnesen J,
    2. Inavalli VVGK,
    3. Nägerl UV
    (2018) Super-Resolution Imaging of the Extracellular Space in Living Brain Tissue. Cell 172:1108–1121.e15. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.007 pmid:29474910
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Wen PJ,
    2. Grenklo S,
    3. Arpino G,
    4. Tan X,
    5. Liao HS,
    6. Heureaux J,
    7. Peng SY,
    8. Chiang HC,
    9. Hamid E,
    10. Zhao WD,
    11. Shin W,
    12. Nareoja T,
    13. Evergren E,
    14. Jin Y,
    15. Karlsson R,
    16. Ebert SN,
    17. Jin A,
    18. Liu AP,
    19. Shupliakov O,
    20. Wu LG
    (2016) Actin dynamics provides membrane tension to merge fusing vesicles into the plasma membrane. Nat Commun 7:12604. pmid:27576662
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Willig KI,
    2. Rizzoli SO,
    3. Westphal V,
    4. Jahn R,
    5. Hell SW
    (2006) STED microscopy reveals that synaptotagmin remains clustered after synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Nature 440:935–939. pmid:16612384
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Wu LG,
    2. Hamid E,
    3. Shin W,
    4. Chiang HC
    (2014) Exocytosis and endocytosis: modes, functions, and coupling mechanisms. Annu Rev Physiol 76:301–331. pmid:24274740
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Xu K,
    2. Zhong G,
    3. Zhuang X
    (2013) Actin, spectrin, and associated proteins form a periodic cytoskeletal structure in axons. Science 339:452–456. pmid:23239625
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Xu F,
    2. Zhang M,
    3. He W,
    4. Han R,
    5. Xue F,
    6. Liu Z,
    7. Zhang F,
    8. Lippincott-Schwartz J,
    9. Xu P
    (2017) Live cell single molecule-guided bayesian localization super resolution microscopy. Cell Res 27:713–716.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Younts TJ,
    2. Monday HR,
    3. Dudok B,
    4. Klein ME,
    5. Jordan BA,
    6. Katona I,
    7. Castillo PE
    (2016) Presynaptic protein synthesis is required for long-term plasticity of GABA release. Neuron 92:479–492. doi:10.1126/science.1232251
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Zhao WD,
    2. Hamid E,
    3. Shin W,
    4. Wen PJ,
    5. Krystofiak ES,
    6. Villarreal SA,
    7. Chiang HC,
    8. Kachar B,
    9. Wu LG
    (2016) Hemi-fused structure mediates and controls fusion and fission in live cells. Nature 534:548–552. doi:10.1038/nature18598 pmid:27309816
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 38 (44)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 38, Issue 44
31 Oct 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
New observations in neuroscience using superresolution microscopy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
New observations in neuroscience using superresolution microscopy
Michihiro Igarashi, Motohiro Nozumi, Ling-Gang Wu, Francesca Cella Zanacchi, István Katona, László Barna, Pingyong Xu, Mingshu Zhang, Fudong Xue, Edward Boyden
Journal of Neuroscience 31 October 2018, 38 (44) 9459-9467; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1678-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
New observations in neuroscience using superresolution microscopy
Michihiro Igarashi, Motohiro Nozumi, Ling-Gang Wu, Francesca Cella Zanacchi, István Katona, László Barna, Pingyong Xu, Mingshu Zhang, Fudong Xue, Edward Boyden
Journal of Neuroscience 31 October 2018, 38 (44) 9459-9467; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1678-18.2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Storytelling Brain: How Neuroscience Stories Help Bridge the Gap between Research and Society
  • BRAIN Initiative: Cutting-Edge Tools and Resources for the Community
  • Beta Oscillations in Working Memory, Executive Control of Movement and Thought, and Sensorimotor Function
Show more Symposium and Mini-Symposium
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.