Binge drinking, intermittent periods with high levels of alcohol consumption, is common among human adolescents. Alcohol exposure during adolescence can exert persistent effects on brain maturation and increase the risk of developing an alcohol use disorder (AUD) later in life. One key brain region involved with this long-term vulnerability is the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Substantial development of the PFC occurs during adolescence, allowing the PFC to moderate appetitive behaviors such as drinking. During this crucial developmental period, insults like drug or alcohol exposure can induce PFC impairments that extend into adulthood. Therefore, evaluating the changes that occur during adolescent binge drinking might improve our understanding of AUD etiology and aid efforts to develop novel treatments.
Its anatomical connections suggest that the PFC coordinates the sensation of external cues, the interpretation of motivational state, and the execution of appetitive behaviors. Several physiological parameters modify the activity of layer 5 PFC pyramidal cells to regulate information outflow to other structures. These factors include excitatory synaptic drive, inhibitory transmission from interneurons, modulatory signaling from glia, and the membrane properties of the pyramidal cells themselves. Increasingly, long-term changes in membrane physiology (i.e., the plasticity of intrinsic excitability) are recognized to contribute to persistent behavioral adaptations following exposure to drugs or alcohol (Kourrich et al., 2015; Harrison et al., 2017). While several studies have demonstrated that chronic ethanol exposure reorganizes synaptic transmission in the deep layers of the PFC (Kroener et al., 2012; Klenowski et al., 2016; Centanni et al., 2017; Trantham-Davidson et al., 2017), the effects on intrinsic excitability remain less well understood. In a recent article in The Journal of Neuroscience, Salling et al. (2018) address this gap by assessing how adolescent binge drinking alters membrane physiology in the adult mouse PFC.
Salling et al. (2018) gave mice voluntary access to ethanol during the critical adolescent developmental window [postnatal day 28 (P28) to P60], then assessed PFC-dependent behaviors in adulthood (P65–P95). Mice were given two drinking bottles in their home cage and received access to 15% ethanol every other day. During the first five sessions, mice escalated their voluntary drinking, peaking at ∼18 g/kg/d. Importantly, the mean blood alcohol content (BAC) reached nearly 90 mg/dl, surpassing the commonly defined threshold for binge drinking (80 mg/dl).
After at least 3 d of withdrawal, behavioral experiments were performed to assess the long-term consequences of adolescent intermittent ethanol consumption. Despite commonly observed affective disturbances during ethanol withdrawal (Holleran and Winder, 2017), the authors found no evidence of anxiety-like behavior. Mice were then trained to perform a maze-based nonmatch to sample task; performance on such tasks depends on PFC function (Kellendonk et al., 2006; Moore et al., 2012). Salling et al. (2018) had mice explore one arm of a T-shaped maze during a sample period, then, in the choice phase, reinforced mice if they turned toward the opposite arm. The binge-drinking group required more training sessions, on average, to reach 80% accuracy on the task, suggesting a mild deficit in rule learning or working memory. To specifically examine working memory, a delay period (5–180 s) was inserted between the sample and choice phases. The ethanol-exposed mice displayed lower accuracy during this task, particularly following long delays that require relatively high cognitive demand. These findings suggest that adolescent binge drinking can induce working memory impairments that persist into adulthood.
Next, the authors assessed the long-term impact of adolescent intermittent ethanol consumption on adult drinking behavior. To the authors' surprise, no effects on total ethanol consumed or BAC attained were observed; however, adult mice that had consumed ethanol intermittently during adolescence drank more during the first 5 min of the sessions than controls did. Similar “front-loading” drinking behaviors have been observed in humans with increased AUD vulnerability (Gowin et al., 2017), suggesting that long-term disease-relevant behavioral changes are present in this mouse model.
Because the PFC is a key brain region supporting working memory and the moderation of drinking behaviors, Salling et al. (2018) examined whether intermittent ethanol consumption affects intrinsic plasticity in layer 5 pyramidal cells, the primary output neurons of the rodent PFC. Membrane physiology was assessed using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. The resting membrane potential was more hyperpolarized in pyramidal cells in the binge-drinking group compared with controls immediately after ethanol exposure, and this change persisted for up to 30 d of abstinence. During hyperpolarizing current steps, PFC pyramidal cells display a depolarizing voltage rebound, or “sag,” which is typically mediated by hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation (HCN) channels (Thuault et al., 2013; Shah, 2014). Because this sag limits the hyperpolarization of the resting membrane potential, loss of this current might explain the hyperpolarized resting potential after binge drinking. Consistent with this hypothesis, the sag ratio (the difference between the peak and steady-state voltages in response to hyperpolarizing current) was lower in the binge-drinking group than in controls. Moreover, an HCN channel inhibitor mimicked the ethanol-induced membrane hyperpolarization and decrease in sag ratio, and abrogated differences in both measurements between the control and binge-drinking groups. Finally, Salling et al. (2018) corroborated these findings using immunohistochemistry. While no difference in total Hcn1 expression was observed, adolescent binge drinking was associated with decreased expression of Trip8b, a subunit required for trafficking Hcn1 to the plasma membrane in pyramidal cells (Shah, 2014). Together, these convergent findings suggest that adolescent binge drinking generated a long-term impairment in PFC HCN channel function, concomitant with persistent changes in working memory and drinking behavior.
Collectively, the findings by Salling et al. (2018) provide insight about why AUD patients might have deficits in working memory (Abernathy et al., 2010), a process subserved by reciprocal connections between the PFC and mediodorsal thalamus (MDT; Bolkan et al., 2017). Output from the PFC to the MDT is thought to be particularly important during the choice phase of working memory tasks, when actions are selected based on recent experiences. One possible mechanism underlying the drinking-induced working memory deficit is that membrane hyperpolarization decreases the activity of MDT-projecting pyramidal cells. Neurons that rest at hyperpolarized potentials require more stimulation to fire action potentials and transmit information to downstream structures. Therefore, the reduced function of HCN channels and resulting membrane hyperpolarization could decrease the likelihood of PFC–MDT pyramidal cells to reach threshold and impair the conversion of a short-term memory into an appropriate action.
An alternative possibility is that alcohol-induced loss of HCN channels increases the activity of pyramidal cells. In addition to modulating membrane potential, HCN channels regulate the integration of synaptic inputs to pyramidal cells. HCN channels allow cations to traverse the membrane when pyramidal cells are at resting potentials. Due to this property, HCN channels decrease the membrane resistance and ensure that relatively large currents are required to depolarize the surface membrane in select locations, such as spine necks (Wang et al., 2007). Dendritic HCN channels thereby gate the flow of information toward the soma, and decreased Hcn1 function can enhance synaptic drive and subsequent pyramidal cell activity (Huang et al., 2009). Moreover, neurons that project to the MDT seem particularly susceptible to this HCN-mediated disinhibition (Ying et al., 2012). Based on this, decreased dendritic HCN channel function resulting from adolescent binge drinking might induce an overactive or asynchronous PFC–MDT circuit and disrupt working memory performance through premature, perseverative, or inappropriate action selection.
At face value, the loss of HCN channel function seems to induce opposing expected changes to pyramidal cells: decreased spiking through somatic hyperpolarization versus increased synaptic activity via disinhibition. While both outcomes could occur in a single cell, it is likely that one mechanism would induce a greater impact on neuron activity in vivo, and future studies should shed light on those outcomes. Additionally, these changes to somatic and dendritic HCN channel functions could occur simultaneously in separable pyramidal cell subpopulations. For example, MDT-projecting pyramidal cells might display distinct changes from neighboring neurons that project to the striatum. This raises the possibility that decreased dendritic HCN channel function induces the hyperactivity of MDT-projecting neurons, while somatic hyperpolarization attenuates PFC output to the striatum. This hypothesis has important ramifications for the different behaviors affected by adolescent binge drinking. The working memory deficit is likely subserved by the dysregulation of MDT-projecting neurons, whereas an impairment in top-down control of the striatum might mediate the front-loading drinking phenotype. Future studies should elucidate how HCN channels modulate specific PFC subpopulations to shed light on these potential mechanisms.
Genetic deletion of Hcn1 in the PFC can disrupt working memory (Thuault et al., 2013; but see also Wang et al., 2007). While decreased surface expression of Hcn1 provides a potential mechanism for diminished HCN channel function in the present studies, a second nonexclusive explanation is that binge drinking disrupts second messengers or signaling partners that interact with HCN channels. HCN channel function is gated by the intracellular pool of cAMP. In the PFC, dopamine and noradrenaline receptors regulate local cAMP concentrations and are also known to modulate HCN channel function and working memory (Wang et al., 2007). These findings raise the possibility that chronic alterations in PFC monoamine signaling might underlie the generation or expression of pathophysiological changes induced by adolescent binge drinking. Consistent with that hypothesis, Trantham-Davidson et al. (2017) found that several functions of Gs/olf-coupled D1 dopamine receptors in the adult PFC were abolished after adolescent ethanol exposure. Thus, an impairment in D1-stimulated cAMP production might contribute to long-lasting deficits in HCN function and working memory. Other receptors that might be involved in PFC pathophysiology following adolescent drinking include the α2A adrenoreceptor (Wang et al., 2007) and mGlu3 metabotropic glutamate receptor (Jin et al., 2017). These Gi/o-coupled receptors are thought to be expressed in close proximity to PFC HCN channels and have been implicated in both working memory and ethanol seeking (Joffe et al., 2018). Based on these links, manipulations that potentiate D1 or inhibit α2A or mGlu3 might be explored as means to mitigate deficits in HCN channel function, working memory, and/or ethanol seeking observed following adolescent binge drinking. In conclusion, Salling et al. (2018) make several advances that enhance our understanding of how adolescent binge drinking confers long-term PFC deficits. These findings highlight the importance of studying intrinsic plasticity to fully understand experience-induced changes in PFC function.
Footnotes
Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/preparing-manuscript#journalclub.
Financial support was provided by a postdoctoral fellowship through the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation. I thank Jeff and several members of the Conn laboratory for helpful and thought-provoking discussions.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Max E. Joffe, Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, 12475E Medical Research Building IV, Nashville, TN 37232. max.joffe{at}vanderbilt.edu