In the article “Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities?” by Jan-Matthis Lueckmann, Jakob H. Macke, and Hendrikje Nienborg, which appeared on pages 3495–3506 of the April 4, 2018 issue, the equations for the autoregressive models CM 1 and CM 2 on page 3498 were incorrect. The correct equations are as follows:
Compatible model 1 (CM 1)
where ϵ and ε are Gaussian noise, ct and st the choice and spike count on trial t, respectively.
Compatible model 2 (CM 2)
The article has been corrected online.
