Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleResearch Articles, Neurobiology of Disease

Convergent Inputs from the Hippocampus and Thalamus to the Nucleus Accumbens Regulate Dopamine Neuron Activity

Stephanie M. Perez and Daniel J. Lodge
Journal of Neuroscience 12 December 2018, 38 (50) 10607-10618; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2629-16.2018
Stephanie M. Perez
Department of Pharmacology and Center for Biomedical Neuroscience, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephanie M. Perez
Daniel J. Lodge
Department of Pharmacology and Center for Biomedical Neuroscience, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel J. Lodge
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aberrant hippocampal activity is observed in individuals with schizophrenia and is thought to underlie the augmented dopamine system function associated with psychosis. The pathway by which the ventral hippocampus (vHipp) regulates dopamine neuron activity has been demonstrated previously and involves a glutamatergic projection to the nucleus accumbens (NAc). Recent postmortem studies have confirmed glutamatergic abnormalities in the NAc of individuals with schizophrenia. Specifically, an increase in vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (vGlut2) expression was reported. Although projections from the hippocampus do express vGlut2, inputs from the thalamus are more likely to account for this alteration; however, the role of thalamic inputs to the NAc in the regulation of dopamine neuron activity has not been elucidated. Here, using male Sprague Dawley rats, we demonstrate that a subset of NAc medium spiny neurons receive convergent inputs from the vHipp and paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT), with both regions working synergistically to regulate dopamine neuron activity. Activation of either the vHipp or PVT increases the number of spontaneously active dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Moreover, this regulation requires simultaneous activity in both regions because PVT inactivation can reverse vHipp-induced increases in dopamine neuron population activity and vHipp inactivation can reverse PVT-induced increases. This is relevant to schizophrenia because inactivation of either the vHipp or PVT is sufficient to reverse aberrant dopamine system function in two distinct rodent models. These data suggest that thalamic abnormalities may contribute to the aberrant dopamine system function observed in schizophrenia and that the PVT represents a novel site of intervention for psychosis.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Current treatments for schizophrenia are far from adequate and a more complete understanding of the pathophysiology underlying this disease is warranted if we are to discover novel therapeutic targets. We have previously demonstrated that the aberrant dopamine system function observed in individuals with schizophrenia and rodent models is driven by increases in hippocampal activity. We now demonstrate that thalamic (paraventricular nucleus, PVT) and ventral hippocampal afferents converge in the nucleus accumbens to regulate dopamine system function. Such information provides a potential site for therapeutic intervention for schizophrenia. Indeed, inactivation of the PVT can effectively reverse aberrant dopamine system function in two distinct rodent models displaying circuit level alterations and corresponding behavioral deficits relevant to schizophrenia.

  • electrophysiology
  • hippocampus
  • MAM
  • poly I:C
  • schizophrenia
  • thalamus

Introduction

Dysregulation of mesolimbic dopamine system function is consistently observed in individuals with schizophrenia and is thought to contribute to the positive symptoms of the disorder (Laruelle and Abi-Dargham, 1999; Abi-Dargham, 2004). Although the cause of this augmented dopamine system function has not been conclusively demonstrated, it is likely secondary to aberrant regulation by glutamatergic and GABAergic systems (Lewis et al., 1999, 2005; Javitt, 2009; Moghaddam and Javitt, 2012). One such region that has gained increased attention is the hippocampus. Indeed, individuals with schizophrenia display hyperactivity within hippocampal subfields that is correlated with clinical measures of positive symptoms (Heckers, 2001; Schobel et al., 2009). This hippocampal hyperactivity has been modeled in rodents, in which evidence suggests that the dysfunction present in the dopamine system is driven by aberrant hippocampal activity (Lodge and Grace, 2007; Perez and Lodge, 2013). Specifically, abnormal glutamatergic transmission from the ventral hippocampus (vHipp) leads to an increase in dopamine neuron activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) via a polysynaptic circuit involving the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and ventral pallidum (Lodge and Grace, 2011 and see Fig. 8). Consistent with this, recent postmortem studies have revealed glutamatergic abnormalities in the NAc that may contribute to the pathology of the disorder (McCollum and Roberts, 2015).

Vesicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 (vGlut1 and vGlut2) are required for the uptake of glutamate into presynaptic vesicles (Bellocchio et al., 2000; Takamori et al., 2000). vGlut1 mRNA is highly expressed in the cortex and hippocampus, whereas vGlut2 is enriched in subcortical structures (i.e., thalamus, amygdala) (Hisano et al., 2000). Interestingly, recent postmortem studies have reported elevated vGlut2 (but not vGlut1) expression in the NAc of individuals with schizophrenia (McCollum and Roberts, 2015). Although the hippocampus does express low levels of this transporter (Fremeau et al., 2001), it is more likely that these reported differences are attributable to altered input from the thalamus because an increase in thalamic vGlut2 expression has been previously reported postmortem in individuals with schizophrenia (Smith et al., 2001). The thalamus is a structure that has been consistently implicated in schizophrenia, with evidence supporting structural abnormalities such as reduced cell number and volume (Clinton and Meador-Woodruff, 2004) and dysfunction in patients (Oke and Adams, 1987; Clinton and Meador-Woodruff, 2004). The thalamus is composed of many nuclei; however, it has been demonstrated that it is the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) that provides the predominant glutamatergic projection to the NAc (Su and Bentivoglio, 1990; Bubser and Deutch, 1998; Pinto et al., 2003; Dong et al., 2017). Moreover, how the PVT regulates mesolimbic dopamine system function has yet to be examined. Here, we investigate the contributions of PVT and hippocampal afferents to the NAc in the regulation of VTA dopamine neuron activity. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the PVT may be a novel site of intervention for the treatment of psychosis by examining its role in under normal conditions and in two distinct rodent models displaying circuit level alterations and corresponding behavioral deficits relevant to schizophrenia: gestational methylazoxymethanol acetate (MAM) administration and maternal inflammation.

Materials and Methods

Experiments.

All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the National Institutes of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and the Use Committee of University of Texas Health San Antonio.

Animals.

Male Sprague Dawley rats were obtained from Envigo and used for the majority of experiments. To generate rodents displaying circuit level alterations and corresponding behavioral deficits relevant to schizophrenia, we used gestational administration of either MAM or polyinosine:cytosine (poly I:C). MAM administration was performed as described previously (Moore et al., 2006; Lodge, 2013). In brief, timed pregnant female Sprague Dawley rats (Envigo) were obtained on gestational day (GD) 16 and MAM (22 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered on GD17. Injections of saline (1 ml/kg, i.p.) were administered to control dams. Poly I:C was administered to timed pregnant female Sprague Dawley rats obtained from Envigo on GD11. Poly I:C (7.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline (1 ml/kg, i.p.) was administered on GD12. Male pups (MAM, poly I:C, and saline controls) were weaned on postnatal day (P) 21 and housed with littermates in groups of 2–3 until adulthood (>P60). All experiments were performed on multiple litters of MAM-, poly I:C- and saline-treated rats.

Dopamine neuron electrophysiology.

Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (300–450 g) were anesthetized with 8% chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg, i.p.) and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus. Chloral hydrate was used for all recordings because it does not significantly depress dopamine neuron activity (Hyland et al., 2002). Supplemental anesthesia was given as required to maintain suppression of limb compression withdrawal reflex. A core body temperature of 37°C was sustained using a thermostatically controlled heating pad. Extracellular glass microelectrodes (impedance ∼6–10 MΩ) were lowered in the VTA (posterior 5.3 to 5.7; lateral 0.6 to 1.0 mm from bregma and −6.5 to- 9.0 mm ventral of the brain surface) using a hydraulic micro-positioner (Model 640, Kopf Instruments). Spontaneously active dopamine neurons were identified using previously established electrophysiological criteria (Grace and Bunney, 1983; Ungless and Grace, 2012). In short, dopamine neurons were identified with open filter settings (low-frequency cutoff: 30 Hz; high-frequency cutoff: 30 kHz) and spontaneously active dopamine neurons were recorded while making multiple vertical passes (typically 6–9), separated by 200 μm in a predetermined pattern to sample various regions of the VTA. Three parameters of dopamine neuron activity were measured: population activity, defined as the number of dopamine neurons firing spontaneously (Lodge and Grace, 2011), basal firing rate, and proportion of action potentials occurring in bursts.

Intracranial drug administration.

For acute, intracranial administration of drugs, a standard guide cannula (26 gauge; Plastics One) with an internal cannula (Plastics One) extending 2 mm past the end of the guide was used. Tetrodotoxin citrate (TTX; 0.25 ng in 0.75 μl), NMDA (0.75 μg in 0.5 μl), kynurenic acid (KA; 7.5 μg in 0.75 μl), or vehicle [Dulbecco's PBS (DPBS); 0.75 μl] was injected immediately adjacent to the PVT (A/P −2.0; M/L +0.4 mm from bregma; D/V −5.8 mm ventral of the brain surface) to avoid damage to the relatively small structure or was injected directly into the vHipp (A/P −5.3; M/L +5.0 mm from bregma; D/V −6.5 mm ventral of the brain surface) or NAc (A/P +1.4; M/L +1.3 mm from bregma; D/V −6.6 mm ventral of the brain surface). Each rat received a combination of unilateral intracranial injections (administered at a rate of ∼0.5 μl/min) depending on the experiment performed and as detailed below. Recordings began ∼10 min after injection and typically lasted for ∼2 h after drug administration, so only a single injection was administered per region, consistent with previous experimental approaches (Floresco et al., 2003; Lodge and Grace, 2007; Aguilar et al., 2014; Zimmerman and Grace, 2016).

Chemogenetic modulation of PVT afferents.

All survival procedures were performed under general anesthesia in a semisterile environment. Male Sprague Dawley rats (220–250 g) were anesthetized with Fluriso (2–5% isoflurane, USP, with oxygen flow at 1 L/min) and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus using blunt atraumatic ear bars. A core body temperature of 37°C was maintained. Rats were unilaterally injected (∼0.5 μl per min) in the PVT (A/P −2.0; M/L +0.4 mm from bregma; D/V −5.2 mm ventral of the brain surface) with adeno-associated virus (AAV) expressing the Gq-DREADD receptor vectors driven by the human synuclein promotor (AAV2-hSyn-HA-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry; Addgene: 50474-AAV2; titer- 3.48 × 10e12 vg/ml; 0.75 μl). Control rats were administered a control viral vector lacking the hM3D encoding gene (rAAV2/CaMKIIα-eYFP; UNC Vector Core; 3.8 × 10e12 vg/ml). Rats were allowed to recover for 6–8 weeks before testing to allow for robust gene expression in target regions. To activate discrete PVT inputs to the NAc or mPFC, clozapine-N-oxide (CNO; 300 μm; 0.75 μl) was directly injected into the NAc (A/P +1.4; M/L +1.3 mm from bregma; D/V −7.6 mm ventral of the brain surface) or mPFC (A/P +3.0; M/L +0.6 mm from bregma; D/V −4.5 mm ventral of the brain surface) 10 min before recording. A single injection was administered because the biological effects of CNO have been reported 6–10 h after administration (Alexander et al., 2009; Guettier et al., 2009). DREADD expression in neurons projecting from the PVT to the NAc or mPFC were verified histologically using Neurolucida (MBF Bioscience) in combination with a Zeiss epifluorescent microscope.

Chemogenetic modulation of projections to the NAc.

Male Sprague Dawley rats (220–250 g) were anesthetized with Fluriso (2–5% isoflurane, USP, with oxygen flow at 1 L/min) and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus using blunt atraumatic ear bars. A core body temperature of 37°C was maintained. Rats were bilaterally injected (∼0.5 μl per min) in the NAc (A/P +1.4; M/L ±1.4 mm from bregma; D/V −7.6 mm ventral of the brain surface) with a long-term retrograde herpes simplex virus (HSV) expressing a Cre recombinase driven by the human elongation factor-1 α (hEF1α) promotor (HSV-hEF1α-Cre: 0.75 μl; Massachusetts General Hospital; RN425) or a control virus (hEF1α-EYFP; 0.75 μl; Massachusetts General Hospital; RN402). At the same time, AAV expressing the Gq-DREADD in a double-floxed inverse open reading frame (AAV-hSyn-DIO-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry) was injected into the PVT (A/P −2.0; M/L ±0.4 mm from bregma; D/V −5.4 mm ventral of the brain surface) or vHipp (A/P −4.8; M/L ±4.8 mm from bregma; D/V −7.8 mm ventral of the brain surface). All rats were allowed to recover for 6–8 weeks before any testing to allow for robust gene expression in target regions. Twenty minutes before electrophysiology, rats were injected systemically with the DREADD agonist Compound 21 (3.0 mg/kg, i.p.; HelloBio; HB6124), used to mitigate potential concerns associated with the back metabolism of CNO to clozapine following systemic administration (Chen et al., 2015; MacLaren et al., 2016).

Extracellular recordings from putative medium spiny neurons.

Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (300–450 g) were anesthetized (8% chloral hydrate; 400 mg/kg, i.p.) and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus. Stimulating electrodes (bipolar concentric; Kopf Instruments) were lowered immediately adjacent to the PVT (A/P −2.0; M/L +0.4 mm from bregma; D/V −5.8 mm ventral of the brain surface) and within the vHipp (A/P −5.3; M/L +5.0 mm from bregma; D/V −6.5 mm ventral of the brain surface). Extracellular glass microelectrodes (impedance 6–10 MΩ) were lowered into the NAc (A/P +1.4; M/L +1.3 mm from bregma and −4.5 to −7.5 mm ventral of the brain surface). Putative medium spiny neurons that responded to electrical stimulation (1 mA; pulse rate: 0.5 Hz; pulse duration: 0.25 ms; delay between PVT and vHipp stimulation: 0.25 s) from the PVT, vHipp, or both structures were recorded for 3–5 min and the cells that responded were counted and reported.

Histology.

Rats used in chemogenetic studies were transcardially perfused (150 ml of cold saline immediately followed by 150 ml of 4% formaldehyde in saline) immediately after electrophysiological recordings. Brains were postfixed for at least 24 h (4% formaldehyde in saline) and cryoprotected (25% w/v sucrose in PBS) until saturated and sectioned coronally (25 μm) on a cryostat (Leica). Sections were mounted onto gelatin-chrom-coated slides and coverslipped with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific; P36930) for verification of viral reporter expression in a subset of animals. At the cessation of all other experiments, rats were decapitated and brains extracted, postfixed for at least 24 h (4% formaldehyde in saline), and cryoprotected (25% w/v sucrose in PBS) until saturated. Next, brains were coronally sectioned (25 μm) using a cryostat (Leica). Sections containing electrode or cannula tracks were mounted onto gelatin-chrom-coated slides and stained with neutral red (0.1%) and thionin acetate (0.01%) for histological verification of electrode tracks within the VTA or NAc or cannula/electrode tracks within the PVT, vHipp, or NAc (Paxinos and Watson, 1998).

Statistical analysis.

Electrophysiological analysis of dopamine neuron activity was performed using commercially available computer software (LabChart version 7.1; ADInstruments) and analyzed with Prism software (GraphPad Software). Data are represented as the mean ± SEM unless otherwise stated, with n values representing the number of animals per experimental group or the number of neurons per group where indicated. Statistics were calculated using SigmaPlot (Systat Software). Data were analyzed by one-way or two-way ANOVA and the Holm–Sidak post hoc test, with significance determined at p < 0.05.

Materials.

MAM was from Midwestern Research Institute. Chloral hydrate, NMDA, KA, DPBS, CNO (C0832), and poly I:C (P1530) were all from Sigma-Aldrich. TTX was from Tocris Bioscience. Compound 21 was from HelloBio (HB6124). Fluriso was from VetOne (502017). DREADD receptor vectors [50474: AAV2-hSyn-HA-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry; 44361: AAV-hSyn-DIO-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry] were from Addgene. The control viral vector lacking the hM3D encoding gene (rAAV2/CaMKIIα-eYFP) was from the University of North Carolina Vector Core. HSV-Cre (RN425) and control virus (RN402) were from Massachusetts General Hospital. All other chemicals and reagents were of either analytical or laboratory grade and purchased from various suppliers.

Results

PVT activation increases dopamine neuron population activity via a hippocampal-dependent mechanism

Consistent with previous reports (Lodge and Grace, 2007; Perez and Lodge, 2012, 2013; Perez et al., 2013, 2014), control rats (n = 4 rats; vHipp-vehicle) displayed an average of 0.92 ± 0.05 cells per track and were not affected by TTX infusion into the vHipp (n = 4 rats; vHipp TTX; 1.08 ± 0.08 cells per track; Fig. 1A). Activation of the PVT with NMDA caused a significant increase in VTA dopamine neuron population activity (n = 5 rats; PVT-NMDA; 1.87 ± 0.0.19 cells per track) compared with control rats (two-way ANOVA; F(1,18)PVT Treatment = 16.49; F(1,18)vHipp Treatment = 5.98; F(1,18)Interaction = 14.67; Holm–Sidak; p < 0.001; t = 5.48). Interestingly, the observed increase in population activity was similar to what is consistently reported following vHipp activation (Lodge and Grace, 2007) and in various rodent models of schizophrenia (Perez and Lodge, 2013; Perez et al., 2013, 2014, 2016; Aguilar et al., 2014; Boley et al., 2014). The PVT-induced increase in VTA dopamine neuron population activity was reversed by vHipp inactivation with TTX (n = 6 rats; 1.11 ± 0.08 cells per track; Holm–Sidak; p < 0.001; t = 4.82; Fig. 1A), demonstrating that activity in the vHipp is required for the PVT-induced increase in VTA dopamine neuron population activity. It should be noted that, after vHipp inactivation, PVT activation with NMDA increased both the firing rate (PVT-NMDA: n = 40 neurons; 4.59 ± 0.44 Hz; PVT-vehicle: n = 26; 2.60 ± 0.47 Hz; two-way ANOVA; F(1,143)PVT Treatment = 4.47; F(1,143)vHipp Treatment = 0.06; F(1,143)Interaction = 6.27; Holm–Sidak; p = 0.001; t = 3.26; Fig. 1B) and percentage bursting (PVT-NMDA: n = 40 neurons; 40.79 ± 4.80%; PVT-vehicle: n = 26; 27.30 ± 4.59%; two-way ANOVA; F(1,143)PVT Treatment = 0.38; F(1,143)vHipp Treatment = 0.001; F(1,143)Interaction = 4.78; Holm–Sidak; p = 0.05; t = 1.98; Fig. 1C) of VTA dopamine neurons. No differences were observed in the firing rates (PVT-vehicle: n = 22 neurons; 3.78 ± 0.35 Hz; PVT-NMDA: n = 56 neurons; 3.61 ± 0.32 Hz) and percentage bursting (PVT-vehicle: n = 22 neurons; 38.03 ± 5.96%; PVT-NMDA: n = 56 neurons; 30.47 ± 3.42%) of vHipp-vehicle-treated rats. Cannula placements are depicted in Figure 1D.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

PVT activation increases dopamine neuron population activity via a hippocampal-dependent mechanism. Three parameters of dopamine neuron activity were measured: (A) population activity (average number of spontaneously active dopamine neurons per electrode track), (B) average firing rate, and (C) average percentage of spikes firing in a burst. NMDA activation of the PVT produces a significant increase in VTA dopamine neuron population activity, which is reversed by TTX inactivation of the vHipp (A: *p < 0.05 compared with PVT-NMDA/vHipp-vehicle; #p < 0.05 compared with PVT-Vehicle/vHipp-vehicle). Additionally, PVT activation significantly increased the firing rate (B: *p < 0.05 compared with PVT-vehicle/vHipp-TTX) and percentage bursting (C: *p < 0.05 compared with PVT-vehicle/vHipp-TTX), but only following vHipp inactivation. D, Schematic demonstrating the sites of injection adjacent to the PVT (top) and within the vHipp (bottom).

PVT-induced increases in dopamine transmission are attributable to glutamatergic projections to the NAc

Next, we used the NMDA receptor antagonist KA to examine the potential glutamatergic projections contributing to the PVT-induced increase in VTA dopamine neuron activity. As reported above, control rats display a population activity of 1.00 ± 0.05 cells per track (n = 7 rats; Fig. 2A) and NMDA activation of the PVT increases in the number of cells per track (n = 7 rats; 1.86 ± 0.13 cells per track; two-way ANOVA; F(2,33)KA = 16.73; F(1,33)NMDA = 28.27; F(2,33)Interaction = 4.88; Holm–Sidak; p < 0.001; t = 5.54). Blocking glutamatergic transmission in the vHipp with KA did not reverse the increase in population activity caused by NMDA activation of the PVT (n = 5 rats; 2.00 ± 0.14 cells per track; Holm–Sidak; p < 0.001; t = 3.81) compared with its respective control (n = 6 rats; 1.33 ± 0.17 cells per track), whereas inhibiting glutamate transmission in the NAc significantly attenuated (Holm–Sidak; p < 0.00; t = 5.26) the PVT-induced increase in dopamine neuron population activity (n = 5 rats; 0.97 ± 0.11 cells per track; control: n = 4 rats; 0.88 ± 0.17 cells per track; Fig. 2A). These data suggest that the increase in population activity caused by PVT activation is due to a glutamatergic projection to the NAc, not the vHipp. Consistent with the data obtained following vHipp inactivation with TTX, NMDA-induced increases in PVT activity significantly increased both firing rate and burst firing only when glutamatergic transmission was blocked in the vHipp (vehicle/PVT-vehicle: n = 42 neurons; 4.08 ± 0.37 Hz, 36.45 ± 0.37%; vehicle/PVT-NMDA: n = 78 neurons; 3.27 ± 0.29 Hz, 25.53 ± 2.89%; vHipp-KA/PVT-vehicle: n = 48 neurons; 3.34 ± 0.36 Hz, 32.03 ± 3.75%; vHipp-KA/PVT-NMDA: n = 59 neurons; 4.44 ± 0.30 Hz; 43.47 ± 3.70%; NAc-KA/PVT-vehicle: n = 21; 3.91 ± 0.54 Hz; 40.63 ± 6.45%; NAc-KA/PVT-NDMA: n = 29; 3.70 ± 0.48 Hz; 35.37 ± 5.40%; two-way ANOVA; firing rate: F(2,276)vHipp/NAc Treatment = 0.20; F(1,276)PVT Treatment = 0.005; Holm–Sidak; *p = 0.022; *t = 2.30; #p = 0.019; #t = 2.75; percentage bursting: F(2,276)Interaction = 4.15; F(2,276)vHipp/NAc Treatment = 0.72; F(1,276)PVT Treatment = 0.005; F(2,276)Interaction = 2.97; Holm–Sidak; *p = 0.033; *t = 2.14; #p = 0.027; #t = 2.63; Fig. 2B,C). Cannula placements are depicted in Figure 2D.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

PVT-induced increases in dopamine neuron transmission are attributable to glutamatergic projections to the NAc. Three parameters of activity were recorded: (A) population activity (average number of spontaneously firing dopamine neurons per electrode track), (B) average firing rate, and (C) average percentage spikes firing in a burst. NMDA activation of the PVT causes a significant increase in the VTA dopamine neuron population activity, which is likely caused by a glutamatergic projection in the NAc because it is attenuated by KA administration into the NAc, but not the vHipp. Following PVT activation (with NMDA), we observed significant increases in the average firing rate and percentage bursting only following glutamatergic blockade with KA in the vHipp. D, Schematic demonstrating the site of injection adjacent to the PVT (top), and within the NAc (middle), and vHipp (bottom). *p < 0.05 compared with respective vehicle control. #p < 0.05 compared with control-vehicle/PVT-NMDA.

Chemogenetic activation of the PVT-NAc, but not the PVT-mPFC, pathway increases VTA dopamine neuron population activity

To further examine the specific PVT afferents responsible for the increase in dopamine neuron activity, we used chemogenetics (Fig. 3D). Activation of the PVT-NAc pathway by the intracranial administration of CNO produced a significant increase in VTA dopamine neuron activity compared with controls (Gq: n = 7 rats; 2.37 ± 0.23 cells per track; control: n = 4 rats; 0.99 ± 0.08 cells per track; two-way ANOVA; F(1,21)PVT Treatment = 20.85; F(1,21)NAc/mPFC Treatment = 21.96; F(1,21)Interaction = 15.35; Holm–Sidak; p < 0.001; t = 5.90; Fig. 3A). Conversely, activation of the PVT-mPFC was without effect (Gq: n = 6 rats; 0.97 ± 0.05 cells per track; control: n = 5 rats; 0.87 ± 0.06 cells per track; Fig. 3A). No significant differences were observed in the firing rate or percentage bursting in the rats with NAc CNO (Gq: n = 95 neurons; 3.69 ± 0.23 Hz; 24.86 ± 2.47%; control: n = 23 neurons; 3.22 ± 0.35 Hz; 28.94 ± 5.18%; Fig. 3B) or mPFC CNO (Gq: n = 34 neurons; 3.71 ± 0.42 Hz; 35.15 ± 4.79%; control: n = 23 neurons; 4.09 ± 0.61 Hz; 30.65 ± 5.66%; Fig. 3C). Histological verification of viral reported expression is depicted in Figure 3E.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Chemogenetic activation of the PVT to the NAc, but not the PVT-mPFC, pathway increases VTA dopamine neuron population activity. Three parameters of activity were recorded: (A) population activity (average number of spontaneously firing dopamine neurons per electrode track), (B) average firing rate, and (C) average percentage spikes firing in a burst. Chemogenetic activation of the PVT-NAc pathway causes a significant increase in VTA dopamine neuron population activity. In contrast, activation of the PVT-mPFC pathway did not affect VTA dopamine neuron population activity. D, Schematic representation of the viral injection (AAV-Gq-DREADD) to the PVT and stainless steel cannula used to target the mPFC or NAc (for CNO administration). E, Histological verification of viral reporter expression demonstrating cell bodies in the PVT (left) and terminals in afferent targets in the mPFC (right). *p < 0.05 compared with control.

To further examine the projections to the NAc that regulate dopamine neuron activity, we combined a retrograde HSV-Cre with an AAV expressing the Gq-DREADD in a double-floxed inverse open reading frame that permitted the specific activation of PVT-NAc or vHipp-NAc pathways following the systemic administration of compound 21 (Fig. 4D). Control rats displayed 1.02 ± 0.04 cells per track, similar to what is commonly observed in normal rats (Fig. 4A). Activation of either the PVT-NAc or vHipp-NAc pathways produced a significant increase in dopamine neuron population activity (vHipp-NAc: n = 6 rats; 1.90 ± 0.13 cells per track; PVT-NAc: n = 6 rats; 1.56 ± 0.06 cells per track; one-way ANOVA; F(1,18)HSV Treatment = 44.57; F(1,18)PVT/vHipp Treatment = 3.31; F(1,18)Interaction = 2.04; Holm–Sidak; pvHipp< 0.001; tvHipp = 6.01; pPVT = 0.003; tPVT = 3.55; Fig. 4A). No significant differences were observed in the firing rate or percentage bursting in any of the groups [control: n = 42 neurons; 2.87 ± 0.48 Hz; 39.92 ± 24.93%; vHipp(Gq): n = 68 neurons; 3.95 ± 0.32 Hz; 36.55 ± 3.59%; PVT(Gq): n = 50 neurons; 3.27 ± 0.31 Hz; 33.01 ± 3.29%; Fig. 4B,C]. Histological representation of recombination is depicted in Figure 4E.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Chemogenetic activation of the pathways from the vHipp and the PVT to the NAc produce increases in VTA dopamine neuron population activity. Three parameters of activity were recorded: (A) population activity (average number of spontaneously firing dopamine neurons per electrode track), (B) average firing rate, and (C) average percentage spikes firing in a burst. Consistent with previous reports, activation of the vHipp-NAc pathway produces a significant increase in VTA dopamine neuron population activity. Here we demonstrate that activation of the PVT-NAc pathway produces a similar effect on dopamine neuron activity. D, Schematic representation of the bilateral viral injections to the vHipp or PVT (AAV-DIO-Gq-DREADD) and NAc (HSV-Cre). E, Histological verification of viral reported expression demonstrating a NAc-projecting neuron in the PVT. *p < 0.05 compared with control.

PVT activity is required for the vHipp to increase dopamine neuron activity

Given that the NMDA activation of the PVT required activity within the vHipp, we investigated whether the converse was also true (i.e., whether PVT activity was required for the vHipp to drive an increase in the population activity of VTA dopamine neurons). Consistent with previous reports (Floresco et al., 2001, 2003; Lodge and Grace, 2006), NMDA activation of the vHipp caused a significant increase in population activity (vHipp-NMDA: n = 5 rats; 1.63 ± 0.08 cells per track; vHipp-vehicle: n = 4 rats; 0.92 ± 0.05 cells per track; two-way ANOVA; F(1,18)vHipp Treatment = 17.89; F(1,18)Thalamus Treatment = 9.89; F(1,18)Interaction = 25.99; Holm–Sidak; p < 0.001; t = 6.41; Fig. 5A), whereas TTX inactivation of the PVT had no effect (vHipp-vehicle: n = 5 rats; 1.07 ± 0.08 cells per track). The vHipp-induced increase in population activity was significantly attenuated by PVT inactivation with TTX (vHipp-NMDA: n = 5 rats; 1.00 ± 0.07 cells per track) and is significantly different from the vHipp-NMDA control group (Holm–Sidak; p < 0.001; t = 6.01). Importantly, PVT inactivation alone did not alter dopamine neuron population activity (n = 5 rats; 1.07 ± 0.08 cells per track). These data further support the hypothesis that activity in both the PVT and vHipp are required to modulate VTA dopamine neuron population activity. Again, consistent with the data depicted above, vHipp activation increased both the firing rate (vHipp-NMDA: n = 30 neurons; 5.19 ± 0.63 Hz; vHipp-vehicle: n = 32 neurons; 3.40 ± 0.46 Hz; two-way ANOVA; F(1,132)PVT Treatment = 9.09; F(1,132)vHipp Treatment = 0.03; F(1,132)Interaction = 0.39; Holm–Sidak; p = 0.011; t = 2.585; Fig. 5B) and percentage bursting (vHipp-NMDA: n = 30 neurons; 49.70 ± 5.48%; vHipp-vehicle: n = 32 neurons; 26.74 ± 4.38%; two-way ANOVA; F(1,132)PVT Treatment = 8.81; F(1,132)vHipp Treatment = 0.50; F(1,132)Interaction = 2.18; Holm–Sidak; p = 0.002; t = 3.16; Fig. 5C) of VTA dopamine neurons, but only after PVT inactivation. No other differences were observed in the firing rates (vHipp-vehicle: n = 22 neurons; 3.78 ± 0.35 Hz; vHipp-NMDA: n = 49 neurons; 4.96 ± 0.38 Hz) or percentage bursting (vHipp-vehicle: n = 22 neurons; 38.03 ± 5.96%; vHipp-NMDA: n = 49 neurons; 45.74 ± 4.33%) of PVT-vehicle-treated rats. Cannula placements are depicted in Figure 5D.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

PVT activity is required for the vHipp to increase dopamine neuron activity. Three parameters of activity were recorded: (A) population activity (average number of spontaneously firing dopamine neurons per electrode track), (B) average firing rate, and (C) and average percentage spikes firing in a burst. NMDA activation of the vHipp causes a significant increase in VTA dopamine neuron population activity, which is attenuated by TTX inactivation of the PVT. Additionally, vHipp activation significantly increased the firing rate and percentage bursting, but only following TTX inactivation of the PVT. D, Schematic demonstrating the site of injection within the PVT (top) and vHipp (bottom). *p < 0.05 compared with vHipp-NMDA/PVT-vehicle. #p < 0.05 compared with PVT-vehicle/vHipp-vehicle.

NAc receives convergent inputs from the PVT and vHipp

To verify that medium spiny neurons of the NAc receive convergent inputs from both the vHipp and PVT, we performed in vivo extracellular recordings from these neurons (representative evoked responses are depicted in Fig. 6B). Average spike latencies for putative medium spiny neurons are 17.21 ± 3.43 ms (n = 100 evoked action potentials) when responding to PVT stimulation and 11.54 ± 0.36 ms (n = 100 evoked action potentials) when responding to vHipp stimulation. A total of 48 neurons were recorded from the NAc, with 29% responding only to stimulation from the PVT, 35% responding only to stimulation from the vHipp, and 36% responding to stimulation from both structures (Fig. 6C). These data demonstrate that a significant proportion of medium spiny neurons within the NAc do indeed receive convergent inputs from the PVT and vHipp. Electrode placements are depicted in Figure 6A.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

The NAc receives convergent input from the PVT and the vHipp. A, Schematic demonstrating the sites of stimulation adjacent to the PVT (top) and within vHipp (bottom). B, Representative trace from a putative medium spiny neuron responding to stimulation from the PVT and vHipp. C, Percentage of cells that responded to stimulation from the PVT, vHipp, or both.

PVT inactivation reverses aberrant dopamine neuron activity in two different rodent models of schizophrenia

We have previously demonstrated that rodent models of schizophrenia display increases in dopamine neuron population activity (Perez and Lodge, 2013; Perez et al., 2013, 2014, 2016; Aguilar et al., 2014; Boley et al., 2014), which has been attributable to increases in vHipp activity because it is reversed by inactivation of the vHipp (Lodge and Grace, 2007). This observation has led to the suggestion that the vHipp may be a novel therapeutic target for schizophrenia (for review, see Perez and Lodge, 2014). Based on the data detailed above, it is likely that PVT manipulations may also be an effective approach to treat the aberrant dopamine system function. Here, we examine the effects of PVT inactivation (using TTX) on the aberrant dopamine neuron activity observed in two different rodent models of schizophrenia. As discussed above, control rats display a population activity of 1.00 ± 0.05 cells per track (n = 7 rats; Fig. 7A). TTX inactivation of the PVT had no effect on population activity in control rats (n = 5 rats; 1.07 ± 0.08 cells per track). MAM-treated rats (n = 7 rats; 1.85 ± 0.12 cells per track) and poly I:C-treated rats (n = 6 rats; 1.64 ± 0.13 cells per track) exhibited significantly higher population activities compared with vehicle controls (two-way ANOVA; F(2,37)PVT Treatment = 17.78; F(1,37)vHipp Treatment = 18.53; F(2,37)Interaction = 6.61; Holm–Sidak; MAM: p < 0.001; t = 6.45; poly I:C: p < 0.001; t = 4.65) and were significantly attenuated by PVT inactivation (MAM: n = 7 rats; 1.38 ± 0.10 cells per track; Holm–Sidak; p = 0.001; t = 3.57; poly I:C: n = 6 rats; 1.00 ± 0.06 cells per track; Holm–Sidak; p < 0.001; t = 4.48). Therefore, pharmacological inactivation of the PVT is sufficient to restore dopamine system function in two rodent models of schizophrenia, suggesting that this region may be a novel site of intervention for the disease. No differences were observed in firing rates (Fig. 7B) or percentage bursting (Fig. 7C) between any of the groups (control vehicle: n = 22 neurons; 3.78 ± 0.35 Hz; 38.03 ± 5.96%; control TTX: n = 32 neurons; 3.40 ± 0.46 Hz; 26.74 ± 4.38%; MAM-vehicle: n = 76 neurons; 4.46 ± 0.25 Hz; 37.21 ± 2.30%; MAM-TTX: n = 56 neurons; 4.40 ± 0.29 Hz; 40.14 ± 4.01%; poly I:C-vehicle: n = 59 neurons; 3.98 ± 0.30 Hz; 36.29 ± 3.88%; poly I:C-TTX: n = 36 neurons; 3.44 ± 0.43 Hz; 31.62 ± 4.08%) Cannula placements are depicted in Figure 7D.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Inactivation of the PVT attenuates aberrant dopamine neuron activity in two different rodent models of schizophrenia. Three parameters of activity were recorded: (A) population activity (average number of spontaneously firing dopamine neurons per electrode track), (B) average firing rate, and (C) average percentage spikes firing in a burst. The MAM and poly I:C rodent models of schizophrenia display a significant increase in VTA dopamine neuron population activity, which is attenuated by TTX inactivation of the PVT. D, Schematic demonstrating the site of injection adjacent to the PVT. *p < 0.05 compared with Prenatal-vehicle. #p < 0.05 compared with PVT-vehicle.

Discussion

Individuals with schizophrenia exhibit enhanced hippocampal activity at baseline, which has been correlated with positive symptom severity (Schobel et al., 2009). Similarly, various rodent models display a similar increase in vHipp activity, as measured by electrophysiology (Lodge and Grace, 2007; Perez and Lodge, 2013; Shah and Lodge, 2013; Boley et al., 2014). Increases in glutamatergic transmission from the vHipp to the NAc augment GABAergic neurotransmission to the ventral pallidum, disinhibiting VTA dopamine neurons (Floresco et al., 2001) (Fig. 8). We have consistently demonstrated that augmented hippocampal activity underlies aberrant dopamine system function in rodent models of schizophrenia (Lodge and Grace, 2007; Perez and Lodge, 2013; Perez et al., 2013, 2016). Further, the hippocampus has been advanced as a novel therapeutic target to treat positive, negative and cognitive symptoms (for review, see Perez and Lodge, 2014).

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Activity in both the PVT and the vHipp are required to induce downstream alterations in dopamine system function. Aberrant activity of the vHipp or PVT causes an increase in glutamatergic transmission to the NAc, driving a hyperfunction of the dopamine system. Dopamine neuron activity can be restored by inactivating either the vHipp or PVT. We posit that afferent projections from the vHipp to NAc are required to generate UP states in NAc medium spiny neurons, whereas PVT afferents drive action potential firing.

As detailed above, recent postmortem studies in individuals with schizophrenia have reported aberrant vGlut2 expression in the NAc (McCollum and Roberts, 2015). Although the hippocampus does express low levels of this transporter (Fremeau et al., 2001), it is more likely that these reported differences are attributable to altered input from the thalamus. There is a significant literature demonstrating alterations in thalamic structure and function in schizophrenia; however, how this pathology contributes to the development or symptoms of schizophrenia has not been elucidated. The thalamus is an integrative structure that serves as a point of convergence for several neuronal circuits (Andreasen et al., 1994; Byne et al., 2009). The volume of the thalamus is consistently reported to be decreased in individuals with schizophrenia (Gilbert et al., 2001; McDonald et al., 2005; Byne et al., 2009), whereas functional imaging studies have reported both increases and decreases in thalamic activation in individuals with schizophrenia (for review, see Pergola et al., 2015). However, whether these thalamic abnormalities contribute to the aberrant regulation of dopamine system function (thought to underlie the positive symptoms of schizophrenia) has not been demonstrated. Here, we investigate the thalamic regulation of VTA dopamine neuron activity in both the normal rat and in pathological rodent models of schizophrenia.

The thalamus is composed of multiple nuclei, each with their own distinct afferent and efferent projections. Studies have shown that the reunions nucleus of the thalamus (RE) is able to modulate VTA dopamine activity via activation of the vHipp or via a polysynaptic circuit involving the RE-mPFC-vHipp (Lisman et al., 2010; Zimmerman and Grace, 2016). However, of importance to this study is the role of the PVT because studies have demonstrated that the PVT provides the predominate thalamic innervation of the NAc (Su and Bentivoglio, 1990; Bubser and Deutch, 1998; Pinto et al., 2003; Dong et al., 2017). Using in vivo electrophysiology, we now demonstrate that pharmacological activation of the PVT induces increases in VTA dopamine neuron population activity. The term “population activity” is based on the observation that a number of dopamine neurons (∼50%) are not spontaneously active in vivo. These “silent” neurons are hyperpolarized due to a tonic GABAergic input from the ventral pallidum (Lodge and Grace, 2011). The role of these silent dopamine neurons appears critical because they provide a gain of function to the dopamine signal. Specifically, by regulating the number of spontaneously active dopamine neurons, one can manipulate the magnitude of the dopamine signal (both tonic and phasic). Therefore, the PVT may regulate the number of spontaneously active dopamine neurons without significantly affecting firing rate or pattern. This is identical to previous reports examining hippocampal regulation of the VTA, in which vHipp activation produces selective increases in dopamine neuron population activity (Lodge and Grace, 2007). Indeed, this is what we observed: pharmacological activation of the PVT (with NMDA) was sufficient to induce a significant increase in VTA dopamine neuron population activity (Fig. 1). To determine whether activity in the vHipp contributed to the PVT-induced increase in dopamine neuron activity, we inactivated the vHipp by intracranial administration of the Na+-channel blocker TTX, which completely prevented the increase in dopamine neuron population activity induced by PVT activation. Interestingly, we also demonstrate that PVT activation was able to increase firing rate and burst firing of midbrain dopamine neurons; however, this was only observed following inactivation of the vHipp (Figs. 1, 2). This further demonstrates the dissociation between the afferent control of dopamine neuron population activity and firing rate/burst firing (Floresco et al., 2003); however, it is unclear whether PVT or adjacent thalamic projections contributed to this observation and why they were only observed following vHipp inactivation.

To determine whether the PVT-induced increase in dopamine neuron activity was due to a glutamatergic projection to the vHipp, we blocked glutamatergic (NMDA) transmission by administering KA into the vHipp. Interestingly, this did not alter the response to PVT activation, suggesting that a glutamatergic projection to the vHipp does not contribute to the observed increase in population activity (Fig. 2). It has been previously demonstrated that vHipp activation of the VTA occurs via a glutamatergic projection to the NAc (Floresco et al., 2001). Given the extensive innervation of the NAc from the PVT, we examined the role of this pathway. We now demonstrate that the PVT-induced increase in dopamine neuron population activity is attributable to a glutamatergic projection to the NAc because administration of KA in this region was sufficient to block any increase in dopamine neuron population activity.

To demonstrate conclusively that the PVT-NAc pathway can modulate dopamine neuron activity, we performed two different chemogenetic studies. First, we expressed Gq-DREADD in the PVT and microinjected CNO into the mPFC or NAc to specifically activate PVT terminals present in these regions (Fig. 3). We did not observe an increase in population activity when we selectively activated PVT-mPFC projections, suggesting that this pathway is not involved in the observed increase in population activity following PVT activation. However, activation of the PVT-NAc pathway produced a similar increase in dopamine neuron population activity, providing further evidence for this pathway in the PVT regulation of dopamine neuron activity. Next, we injected a DIO-Gq-DREADD into either the vHipp or PVT in combination with a retrograde HSV-Cre into the NAc. Following this approach, we again demonstrate that activation of vHipp or PVT inputs to the NAc selectively increase dopamine neuron population activity (Fig. 4).

Given that activity in the vHipp was required for the PVT-induced increase in dopamine neuron activity, we investigated whether the converse was also true. We pharmacologically inactivated the PVT with TTX following NMDA activation of the vHipp (Fig. 5). Interestingly, vHipp activation induced an increase in dopamine neuron population activity that was significantly attenuated by PVT inactivation. These data suggest that the NAc receives convergent inputs from the vHipp and PVT that work in concert to regulate VTA dopamine neuron activity. To determine whether individual neurons in the NAc receive convergent input from the PVT and vHipp, we performed in vivo extracellular recordings from putative medium spiny neurons of the NAc (Fig. 6). We observed that a significant proportion of these cells do indeed receive convergent input from the vHipp and PVT. Previous electrophysiological studies have demonstrated that NAc medium spiny neurons exhibit a bistable membrane potential alternating between the so-called UP (∼−60 mV) and DOWN (∼−75 mV) states (O'Donnell and Grace, 1995; Goto and O'Donnell, 2001). It is only when these cells are in an UP state (i.e., have a depolarized membrane potential) that they are able to fire action potentials in response to afferent input (O'Donnell and Grace, 1995). Interestingly, these UP states have been attributed to vHipp activation because they can be induced by stimulation of the fornix and are abolished by lidocaine inactivation of hippocampal afferents (O'Donnell and Grace, 1995). Therefore, we posit that vHipp afferents to the NAc are required to generate an UP state and that PVT afferents drive spike firing. This would explain why activity in both regions is required to induce downstream alterations in dopamine system function (Fig. 8).

The data detailed above suggest that the PVT may be a novel site of intervention for psychosis by reversing aberrant dopamine neuron population activity. Indeed, we now demonstrate that the aberrant dopamine system function observed in two distinct rodent models displaying circuit level alterations and corresponding behavioral deficits relevant to schizophrenia (MAM and poly I:C) was normalized by pharmacological inactivation of the PVT (Fig. 7).

We have demonstrated that both the vHipp and PVT play a role in the regulation of VTA dopamine neuron activity via convergent glutamatergic inputs to the NAc. Additionally, the increases in dopamine neuron population activity exhibited by various rodent models of the disease are not just reversed by vHipp inactivation (Lodge and Grace, 2007), but also by inactivation of the PVT, further suggesting that these two regions work together to regulate dopamine neuron activity. This study provides evidence of the PVT as a potential site of pathology in schizophrenia and should be investigated as a possible site of therapeutic intervention.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grant RO1 MH090067 from the National Institute of Mental Health to D.J.L.) and the San Antonio Life Science Institute (SALSI Postdoctoral Scholar Fellowship to S.M.P.). We thank Dr. Angela M. Boley for technical assistance.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Stephanie M. Perez, Department of Pharmacology and Center for Biomedical Neuroscience, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7764, San Antonio, TX 78229. Perezsm{at}uthscsa.edu

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abi-Dargham A
    (2004) Do we still believe in the dopamine hypothesis? New data bring new evidence. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 7:S1–S5. doi:10.1017/S1461145704004110 pmid:14972078
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Aguilar DD,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Lodge DJ
    (2014) Increasing endocannabinoid levels in the ventral pallidum restores aberrant dopamine neuron activity in the subchronic PCP rodent model of schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 18:pii: pyu035. doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyu035 pmid:25539511
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Alexander GM,
    2. Rogan SC,
    3. Abbas AI,
    4. Armbruster BN,
    5. Pei Y,
    6. Allen JA,
    7. Nonneman RJ,
    8. Hartmann J,
    9. Moy SS,
    10. Nicolelis MA,
    11. McNamara JO,
    12. Roth BL
    (2009) Remote control of neuronal activity in transgenic mice expressing evolved G protein-coupled receptors. Neuron 63:27–39. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.014 pmid:19607790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Andreasen NC,
    2. Arndt S,
    3. Swayze V 2nd.,
    4. Cizadlo T,
    5. Flaum M,
    6. O'Leary D,
    7. Ehrhardt JC,
    8. Yuh WT
    (1994) Thalamic abnormalities in schizophrenia visualized through magnetic resonance image averaging. Science 266:294–298. doi:10.1126/science.7939669 pmid:7939669
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Bellocchio EE,
    2. Reimer RJ,
    3. Fremeau RT Jr.,
    4. Edwards RH
    (2000) Uptake of glutamate into synaptic vesicles by an inorganic phosphate transporter. Science 289:957–960. doi:10.1126/science.289.5481.957 pmid:10938000
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Boley AM,
    2. Perez SM,
    3. Lodge DJ
    (2014) A fundamental role for hippocampal parvalbumin in the dopamine hyperfunction associated with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 157:238–243. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.05.005 pmid:24888524
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bubser M,
    2. Deutch AY
    (1998) Thalamic paraventricular nucleus neurons collateralize to innervate the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 787:304–310. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01373-5 pmid:9518661
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Byne W,
    2. Hazlett EA,
    3. Buchsbaum MS,
    4. Kemether E
    (2009) The thalamus and schizophrenia: current status of research. Acta Neuropathol 117:347–368. doi:10.1007/s00401-008-0404-0 pmid:18604544
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Choo H,
    3. Huang XP,
    4. Yang X,
    5. Stone O,
    6. Roth BL,
    7. Jin J
    (2015) The first structure-activity relationship studies for designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs. ACS Chem Neurosci 6:476–484. doi:10.1021/cn500325v pmid:25587888
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Clinton SM,
    2. Meador-Woodruff JH
    (2004) Thalamic dysfunction in schizophrenia: neurochemical, neuropathological, and in vivo imaging abnormalities. Schizophr Res 69:237–253. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.017 pmid:15469196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Dong X,
    2. Li S,
    3. Kirouac GJ
    (2017) Collateralization of projections from the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus to the nucleus accumbens, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and central nucleus of the amygdala. Brain Struct Funct 222:3927–3943. doi:10.1007/s00429-017-1445-8 pmid:28528379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Floresco SB,
    2. Todd CL,
    3. Grace AA
    (2001) Glutamatergic afferents from the hippocampus to the nucleus accumbens regulate activity of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. J Neurosci 21:4915–4922. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-13-04915.2001 pmid:11425919
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Floresco SB,
    2. West AR,
    3. Ash B,
    4. Moore H,
    5. Grace AA
    (2003) Afferent modulation of dopamine neuron firing differentially regulates tonic and phasic dopamine transmission. Nat Neurosci 6:968–973. doi:10.1038/nn1103 pmid:12897785
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Fremeau RT Jr.,
    2. Troyer MD,
    3. Pahner I,
    4. Nygaard GO,
    5. Tran CH,
    6. Reimer RJ,
    7. Bellocchio EE,
    8. Fortin D,
    9. Storm-Mathisen J,
    10. Edwards RH
    (2001) The expression of vesicular glutamate transporters defines two classes of excitatory synapse. Neuron 31:247–260. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00344-0 pmid:11502256
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Gilbert AR,
    2. Rosenberg DR,
    3. Harenski K,
    4. Spencer S,
    5. Sweeney JA,
    6. Keshavan MS
    (2001) Thalamic volumes in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 158:618–624. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.4.618 pmid:11282698
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Goto Y,
    2. O'Donnell P
    (2001) Network synchrony in the nucleus accumbens in vivo. J Neurosci 21:4498–4504. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-12-04498.2001 pmid:11404437
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Grace AA,
    2. Bunney BS
    (1983) Intracellular and extracellular electrophysiology of nigral dopaminergic neurons. 1. Identification and characterization. Neuroscience 10:301–315. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(83)90135-5 pmid:6633863
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Guettier JM,
    2. Gautam D,
    3. Scarselli M,
    4. Ruiz de Azua I,
    5. Li JH,
    6. Rosemond E,
    7. Ma X,
    8. Gonzalez FJ,
    9. Armbruster BN,
    10. Lu H,
    11. Roth BL,
    12. Wess J
    (2009) A chemical-genetic approach to study G protein regulation of beta cell function in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19197–19202. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906593106 pmid:19858481
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Heckers S
    (2001) Neuroimaging studies of the hippocampus in schizophrenia. Hippocampus 11:520–528. doi:10.1002/hipo.1068 pmid:11732705
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Hisano S,
    2. Hoshi K,
    3. Ikeda Y,
    4. Maruyama D,
    5. Kanemoto M,
    6. Ichijo H,
    7. Kojima I,
    8. Takeda J,
    9. Nogami H
    (2000) Regional expression of a gene encoding a neuron-specific Na(+)-dependent inorganic phosphate cotransporter (DNPI) in the rat forebrain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 83:34–43. doi:10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00194-7 pmid:11072093
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hyland BI,
    2. Reynolds JN,
    3. Hay J,
    4. Perk CG,
    5. Miller R
    (2002) Firing modes of midbrain dopamine cells in the freely moving rat. Neuroscience 114:475–492. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00267-1 pmid:12204216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Javitt DC
    (2009) When doors of perception close: bottom-up models of disrupted cognition in schizophrenia. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 5:249–275. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153502 pmid:19327031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Laruelle M,
    2. Abi-Dargham A
    (1999) Dopamine as the wind of the psychotic fire: new evidence from brain imaging studies. J Psychopharmacol 13:358–371. doi:10.1177/026988119901300405 pmid:10667612
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Lewis DA,
    2. Pierri JN,
    3. Volk DW,
    4. Melchitzky DS,
    5. Woo TU
    (1999) Altered GABA neurotransmission and prefrontal cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 46:616–626. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00061-X pmid:10472415
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Lewis DA,
    2. Hashimoto T,
    3. Volk DW
    (2005) Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:312–324. doi:10.1038/nrn1648 pmid:15803162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Lisman JE,
    2. Pi HJ,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Otmakhova NA
    (2010) A thalamo-hippocampal-ventral tegmental area loop may produce the positive feedback that underlies the psychotic break in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 68:17–24. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.007 pmid:20553749
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Lodge DJ
    (2013) The MAM rodent model of schizophrenia. Curr Protoc Neurosci 63:9.43.1–9.43.7. doi:10.1002/0471142301.ns0943s63
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Lodge DJ,
    2. Grace AA
    (2006) The hippocampus modulates dopamine neuron responsivity by regulating the intensity of phasic neuron activation. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:1356–1361. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300963 pmid:16319915
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Lodge DJ,
    2. Grace AA
    (2007) Aberrant hippocampal activity underlies the dopamine dysregulation in an animal model of schizophrenia. J Neurosci 27:11424–11430. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2847-07.2007 pmid:17942737
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Lodge DJ,
    2. Grace AA
    (2011) Hippocampal dysregulation of dopamine system function and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Trends Pharmacol Sci 32:507–513. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2011.05.001 pmid:21700346
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. MacLaren DA,
    2. Browne RW,
    3. Shaw JK,
    4. Krishnan Radhakrishnan S,
    5. Khare P,
    6. Espana RA,
    7. Clark SD
    (2016) Clozapine N-oxide administration produces behavioral effects in Long-Evans rats: implications for designing DREADD experiments. eNeuro 3. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0219-16.2016 pmid:27822508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. McCollum LA,
    2. Roberts RC
    (2015) Uncovering the role of the nucleus accumbens in schizophrenia: a postmortem analysis of tyrosine hydroxylase and vesicular glutamate transporters. Schizophr Res 169:369–373. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.041 pmid:26386900
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. McDonald C,
    2. Bullmore E,
    3. Sham P,
    4. Chitnis X,
    5. Suckling J,
    6. MacCabe J,
    7. Walshe M,
    8. Murray RM
    (2005) Regional volume deviations of brain structure in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder: computational morphometry study. Br J Psychiatry 186:369–377. doi:10.1192/bjp.186.5.369 pmid:15863740
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Moghaddam B,
    2. Javitt D
    (2012) From revolution to evolution: the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia and its implication for treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:4–15. doi:10.1038/npp.2011.181 pmid:21956446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Moore H,
    2. Jentsch JD,
    3. Ghajarnia M,
    4. Geyer MA,
    5. Grace AA
    (2006) A neurobehavioral systems analysis of adult rats exposed to methylazoxymethanol acetate on E17: implications for the neuropathology of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 60:253–264. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.01.003 pmid:16581031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. O'Donnell P,
    2. Grace AA
    (1995) Synaptic interactions among excitatory afferents to nucleus accumbens neurons: hippocampal gating of prefrontal cortical input. J Neurosci 15:3622–3639. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03622.1995 pmid:7751934
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Oke AF,
    2. Adams RN
    (1987) Elevated thalamic dopamine: possible link to sensory dysfunctions in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 13:589–604. doi:10.1093/schbul/13.4.589 pmid:2830663
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Paxinos G,
    2. Watson C
    (1998) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic.
  39. ↵
    1. Perez SM,
    2. Lodge DJ
    (2012) Aberrant dopamine D2-like receptor function in a rodent model of schizophrenia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 343:288–295. doi:10.1124/jpet.112.193201 pmid:22859862
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Perez SM,
    2. Lodge DJ
    (2013) Hippocampal interneuron transplants reverse aberrant dopamine system function and behavior in a rodent model of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 18:1193–1198. doi:10.1038/mp.2013.111 pmid:23979606
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Perez SM,
    2. Lodge DJ
    (2014) New approaches to the management of schizophrenia: focus on aberrant hippocampal drive of dopamine pathways. Drug Des Devel Ther 8:887–896. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S42708 pmid:25061280
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Perez SM,
    2. Shah A,
    3. Asher A,
    4. Lodge DJ
    (2013) Hippocampal deep brain stimulation reverses physiological and behavioural deficits in a rodent model of schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 16:1331–1339. doi:10.1017/S1461145712001344 pmid:23190686
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Perez SM,
    2. Carreno FR,
    3. Frazer A,
    4. Lodge DJ
    (2014) Vagal nerve stimulation reverses aberrant dopamine system function in the methylazoxymethanol acetate rodent model of schizophrenia. J Neurosci 34:9261–9267. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0588-14.2014 pmid:25009259
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Perez SM,
    2. Aguilar DD,
    3. Neary JL,
    4. Carless MA,
    5. Giuffrida A,
    6. Lodge DJ
    (2016) Schizophrenia-like phenotype inherited by the F2 generation of a gestational disruption model of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 41:477–486. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.169 pmid:26068729
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Pergola G,
    2. Selvaggi P,
    3. Trizio S,
    4. Bertolino A,
    5. Blasi G
    (2015) The role of the thalamus in schizophrenia from a neuroimaging perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 54:57–75. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.013 pmid:25616183
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Pinto A,
    2. Jankowski M,
    3. Sesack SR
    (2003) Projections from the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus to the rat prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens shell: ultrastructural characteristics and spatial relationships with dopamine afferents. J Comp Neurol 459:142–155. doi:10.1002/cne.10596 pmid:12640666
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Schobel SA,
    2. Lewandowski NM,
    3. Corcoran CM,
    4. Moore H,
    5. Brown T,
    6. Malaspina D,
    7. Small SA
    (2009) Differential targeting of the CA1 subfield of the hippocampal formation by schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66:938–946. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.115 pmid:19736350
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Shah A,
    2. Lodge DJ
    (2013) A loss of hippocampal perineuronal nets produces deficits in dopamine system function: relevance to the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry 3:e215. doi:10.1038/tp.2012.145 pmid:23321812
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Smith RE,
    2. Haroutunian V,
    3. Davis KL,
    4. Meador-Woodruff JH
    (2001) Vesicular glutamate transporter transcript expression in the thalamus in schizophrenia. Neuroreport 12:2885–2887. doi:10.1097/00001756-200109170-00026 pmid:11588596
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Su HS,
    2. Bentivoglio M
    (1990) Thalamic midline cell populations projecting to the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, and hippocampus in the rat. J Comp Neurol 297:582–593. doi:10.1002/cne.902970410 pmid:1696591
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Takamori S,
    2. Rhee JS,
    3. Rosenmund C,
    4. Jahn R
    (2000) Identification of a vesicular glutamate transporter that defines a glutamatergic phenotype in neurons. Nature 407:189–194. doi:10.1038/35025070 pmid:11001057
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Ungless MA,
    2. Grace AA
    (2012) Are you or aren't you? challenges associated with physiologically identifying dopamine neurons. Trends Neurosci 35:422–430. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.02.003 pmid:22459161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Zimmerman EC,
    2. Grace AA
    (2016) The nucleus reuniens of the midline thalamus gates prefrontal-hippocampal modulation of ventral tegmental area dopamine neuron activity. J Neurosci 36:8977–8984. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1402-16.2016 pmid:27559178
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 38 (50)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 38, Issue 50
12 Dec 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Convergent Inputs from the Hippocampus and Thalamus to the Nucleus Accumbens Regulate Dopamine Neuron Activity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Convergent Inputs from the Hippocampus and Thalamus to the Nucleus Accumbens Regulate Dopamine Neuron Activity
Stephanie M. Perez, Daniel J. Lodge
Journal of Neuroscience 12 December 2018, 38 (50) 10607-10618; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2629-16.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Convergent Inputs from the Hippocampus and Thalamus to the Nucleus Accumbens Regulate Dopamine Neuron Activity
Stephanie M. Perez, Daniel J. Lodge
Journal of Neuroscience 12 December 2018, 38 (50) 10607-10618; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2629-16.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • electrophysiology
  • hippocampus
  • MAM
  • poly I:C
  • schizophrenia
  • thalamus

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Functional Heterogeneity within the Primate Ventral Striatum for Motivational Regulation
  • Multimodal Correspondence between Optogenetic fMRI, Electrophysiology, and Anatomical Maps of the Secondary Somatosensory Cortex in Nonhuman Primates
  • Joint Heritability of Sleep EEG Spindle Activity and Thalamic Volume in Early Adolescence
Show more Research Articles

Neurobiology of Disease

  • Threonine-53 phosphorylation of dopamine transporter dictates kappa opioid receptor mediated locomotor suppression, aversion, and cocaine reward
  • Sequence diversity and encoded enzymatic differences of monocistronic L1 ORF2 mRNA variants in the aged normal and Alzheimer’s disease brain
  • The Functional Anatomy of Nociception: Effective Connectivity in Chronic Pain and Placebo Response
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.