Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Ontogeny of Circadian Rhythms and Synchrony in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

Vania Carmona-Alcocer, John H. Abel, Tao C. Sun, Linda R. Petzold, Francis J. Doyle III, Carrie L. Simms and Erik D. Herzog
Journal of Neuroscience 7 February 2018, 38 (6) 1326-1334; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2006-17.2017
Vania Carmona-Alcocer
1Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vania Carmona-Alcocer
John H. Abel
2Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John H. Abel
Tao C. Sun
1Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tao C. Sun
Linda R. Petzold
3Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Linda R. Petzold
Francis J. Doyle III
4John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carrie L. Simms
1Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik D. Herzog
1Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erik D. Herzog
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus coordinates daily rhythms including sleep–wake, hormone release, and gene expression. The cells of the SCN must synchronize to each other to drive these circadian rhythms in the rest of the body. The ontogeny of circadian cycling and intercellular coupling in the SCN remains poorly understood. Recent in vitro studies have recorded circadian rhythms from the whole embryonic SCN. Here, we tracked the onset and precision of rhythms in PERIOD2 (PER2), a clock protein, within the SCN isolated from embryonic and postnatal mice of undetermined sex. We found that a few SCN cells developed circadian periodicity in PER2 by 14.5 d after mating (E14.5) with no evidence for daily cycling on E13.5. On E15.5, the fraction of competent oscillators increased dramatically corresponding with stabilization of their circadian periods. The cells of the SCN harvested at E15.5 expressed sustained, synchronous daily rhythms. By postnatal day 2 (P2), SCN oscillators displayed the daily, dorsal-ventral phase wave in clock gene expression typical of the adult SCN. Strikingly, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), a neuropeptide critical for synchrony in the adult SCN, and its receptor, VPAC2R, reached detectable levels after birth and after the onset of circadian synchrony. Antagonists of GABA or VIP signaling or action potentials did not disrupt circadian synchrony in the E15.5 SCN. We conclude that endogenous daily rhythms in the fetal SCN begin with few noisy oscillators on E14.5, followed by widespread oscillations that rapidly synchronize on E15.5 by an unknown mechanism.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We recorded the onset of PER2 circadian oscillations during embryonic development in the mouse SCN. When isolated at E13.5, the anlagen of the SCN expresses high, arrhythmic PER2. In contrast, a few cells show noisy circadian rhythms in the isolated E14.5 SCN and most show reliable, self-sustained, synchronized rhythms in the E15.5 SCN. Strikingly, this synchrony at E15.5 appears before expression of VIP or its receptor and persists in the presence of blockers of VIP, GABA or neuronal firing. Finally, the dorsal-ventral phase wave of PER2 typical of the adult SCN appears ∼P2, indicating that multiple signals may mediate circadian synchrony during the ontogeny of the SCN.

  • clock genes
  • ontogeny
  • VIP

Introduction

Daily patterns in behavior and physiology are coordinated by circadian pacemakers, which allow organisms to anticipate environmental cycles such as light/dark (Pittendrigh, 1960; Hut and Beersma, 2011). In mammals, the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is a master circadian pacemaker consisting of ∼20,000 neurons. Individual cells can generate circadian rhythms via a negative feedback loop involving core clock genes including Per2 (Hastings et al., 2014; Takahashi, 2017). How and when these rhythms arise during development is not known.

In mice, SCN neurogenesis occurs between embryonic days E10–E15 (where E1 is the day when a vaginal plug is detectable), peaking between E12–E14 and forming from ventrolateral to dorsomedial (Shimada and Nakamura, 1973; Kabrita and Davis, 2008; Shimogori et al., 2010). Transcription factors such as Lhx1, Shh, Six3, and Six6 participate in the embryonic specification of SCN lineages (Shimogori et al., 2010; VanDunk et al., 2011; Clark et al., 2013; Bedont et al., 2014). However, the markers of terminal differentiation and synaptogenesis peak postnatally (Moore and Bernstein, 1989; Shimogori et al., 2010). The rat SCN has fetal day/night differences in 2-deoxyglucose uptake in vivo ∼E19, in vivo daily oscillations in clock genes including Per2 by E20–E21 and in vitro cycling of electrical activity on the day of birth (E22; Reppert and Schwartz, 1983, 1984; Shibata and Moore, 1987; Sládek et al., 2004; Kováciková et al., 2006; Houdek and Sumová, 2014). The mouse SCN has detectable fetal daily rhythms in Per1 transcript levels at E17, and PERIOD1 (PER1) and PER2 proteins by E18 in vivo (Shimomura et al., 2001; Ansari et al., 2009). It is not clear whether these results reflect diurnal rhythms imposed by the mother in utero. Recent studies in vitro have found daily expression of the PER2::LUCIFERASE (Per2Luc) bioluminescent reporter in the whole SCN as early as E13 (Landgraf et al., 2015) or E15 (Wreschnig et al., 2014). It is unclear, however, if or when individual cells in the fetal SCN begin to oscillate and to synchronize their daily rhythms to each other.

To drive coherent rhythms in behavior, cells within the SCN must synchronize their genetic oscillations to an identical period and a consistent phase relationship (Mohawk and Takahashi, 2011; Herzog et al., 2015; Evans and Gorman, 2016). Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) is required for normal synchrony in the SCN. Daily addition of VIP entrains SCN neurons, and the absence of VIP or its receptor, VPAC2R, reduces synchrony between neurons and consequently eliminates many daily rhythms (Harmar et al., 2002; Colwell et al., 2003; Aton et al., 2005; Maywood et al., 2006; Ciarleglio et al., 2009). It is not known which intercellular signals underlie circadian synchrony during development (Wang et al., 2014; Ono et al., 2016). In this study, we examined the embryonic onset of endogenous SCN circadian oscillation and intercellular synchrony.

Materials and Methods

Animals.

All mice were maintained on a C57BL/6JN background (WT) and housed in a 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. light/dark cycle in the Danforth Animal Facility at Washington University. The Per2Luc mouse line was generated by replacing the endogenous mouse Period2 gene locus with a Per2Luc reporter construct (Yoo et al., 2004). For immunochemistry, we compared male and female homozygous Per2Luc pups to Vip−/− and Vipr2−/− pups as negative controls. Vaginal plugs confirmed overnight mating of each female. We designated the morning after mating as E0.5 and the day of birth as postnatal age 0. All procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Washington University and followed National Institutes of Health guidelines.

Cultures and bioluminescence recording.

Pregnant mice were killed with CO2 and cervical dislocation and their embryos dissected into 4°C Hanks buffered saline solution (Sigma-Aldrich). All surgeries started at 1:00 P.M. (Zeitgeber time 06). We recorded bioluminescence from 300 μm coronal SCN slices from fetal (E13.5–E15.5 and E17.5) and postnatal day (P)2 homozygous Per2Luc mice (Landgraf et al., 2015). Briefly, brains were embedded in a block of 4% low-melting agarose and prepared with a vibraslicer. SCN were dissected with scalpels from sections of the ventral hypothalamus and placed on 0.4 mm membrane inserts (Millipore) in sealed 35 mm Petri dishes (BD Biosciences) with 1 ml of DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich, pH 7.2), supplemented with 25 U/ml penicillin, 25 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), 10 mm HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich), 2% B27 (Invitrogen), 0.35 g/L NaHCO3 (Sigma-Aldrich), and 0.15 mm beetle luciferin (Promega). SCN explants were transferred to a light-tight incubator at 36°C (Onyx, Stanford Photonics). We collected images (XR Mega-10AW camera, Stanford Photonics) every 6 min (6 s exposure) and then summed every 10 frames with ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij) to provide one image every hour. We applied adjacent frame minimization to each movie to filter out bright noise caused by the camera or cosmic rays.

Data analysis.

We analyzed the Per2Luc rhythms of the developing SCN at the level of the whole tissue and with 30 μm (pixel) resolution. The statistical analysis for each experiment is described in detail in its respective section. We assessed rhythms measured as the integrated intensity of the SCN tissue with cosinor analysis (software generous gift from B. Meier and A. Kramer, Charité University Berlin). We performed a pixel-based analysis of the same SCN movies. We excluded movies if the corners of the SCN slice moved (3 slices excluded at each of E15.5, E17.5, and P2). We measured periodicity of each pixel (1 px = 900 μm2) and defined pixels as circadian if they had a dominant period between 18 and 32 h (p < 0.05 by Lomb–Scargle periodogram analysis (Ruf, 1999), or a correlation coefficient >0.6 in cosinor analysis. Because the two methods yielded 90 ± 0.02% (mean ± SE; n = 30 brains) agreement in pixel classification, we reported results from the periodogram analysis only. The cycle to cycle variability in Per2Luc was evaluated by detrending rhythmic cells with a discrete wavelet transform (Leise, 2015) keeping only detail coefficients between 16 and 32 h, and measuring the interpeak distance (h) of each cycle. We evaluated the synchronization index using the Kuramato method (Kuramoto, 2003).

A radial distribution of mean peak times was constructed for each SCN to identify the presence of core-shell structure. The time of the initial peak for each pixel was calculated following detrending. A radial distribution of peak times was constructed by binning individual cell peaks based on radial distance from a reference point in the left core. A null distribution of radial peak times was calculated by bootstrapping: reassigning peak time values at random to pixels within each SCN and recalculating the radial distribution using 10,000 bootstrap runs. The SCN was determined to have core-shell structure if the radial peak time distribution showed significant (p < 0.05) peaks for the shell region (early peaking, middle distances) and at least one core region (late-peaking, near and far distances).

Software.

Data analysis was performed in the Python language, using packages scipy and numpy (Jones et al., 2014), PyWavelets, Statsmodels (Seabold and Perktold, 2010), and Matplotlib (Hunter, 2007). Parallelization of data processing was achieved via iPython (Pérez and Granger, 2007). Code for data processing is available on request.

Immunocytochemistry.

Brains of mice from ages E13.5–E17.5, P0, and P2 were removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at 4°C. We transferred them to 30% sucrose in PBS for 24 h at 4°C and sectioned in 30-μm-thick coronal slices onto microscope slides. The sections were incubated for 1 h at 4°C in a blocking solution (10% nonfat dry milk, 10% bovine serum albumin and 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS) and then for 48 h at 4°C in an anti-VIP (1:1000; ImmunoStar) or anti-VPAC2R (1:1000; Abcam) rabbit polyclonal antibody diluted in 3% BSA and 0.35% Triton X-100 in PBS. After washing in PBS, the slides next were incubated at room temperature in a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200; Vector Laboratories) for 2 h and then ABC solution (1:200; Vectastain Elite ABC Kit, Vector Laboratories) for 2 h. Finally, we incubated each slide in 50 mm Tris-HCl using 3,3-diaminobenzidine kit (Sigma-Aldrich). After each step, we rinsed three times for 15 min in PBS. Mounted sections were dehydrated through a series of ethanol and xylene washes. Slides were imaged (NanoZoomer microscope, Leica) and the integrated optical density of the SCN was measured using ImageJ software (Schneider et al., 2012).

Drug treatments.

All drugs were diluted in deionized water and they remained in the recording medium throughout the entire recording without further medium changes. VIP antagonist (200 nm PG-99465) provided by Dr. P. Robberecht (Cutler et al., 2003), GABA antagonist (100 μm Gabazine, Tocris Bioscience), Meclofenamic acid (MEC; 10 μm; Sigma-Aldrich), or TTX (2.5 μm tetrodotoxin).

Results

SCN cells become reliable circadian oscillators after E14.5

Recent in vitro studies have demonstrated the presence of circadian rhythms in PER2 expression in whole SCN explants at E13 (Landgraf et al., 2015) or E15 (Wreschnig et al., 2014), around the times of peak or completed neurogenesis, respectively. To test whether cell-autonomous oscillations appear before tissue-level rhythms, we imaged bioluminescence in fetal Per2Luc/Per2Luc SCN slices. SCN explanted at E13.5 displayed no tissue-level circadian rhythms (n = 8 SCN from 2 litters; Fig. 1). At this stage, the ventricular zone of dorsal hypothalamus expressed high levels of PER2, sometimes in a circadian pattern (n = 2 of the 8 slices; Movie 1), but the bilateral SCN region had low to no PER2 expression and no circadian rhythms. In contrast, all tissues explanted on E14.5 or later displayed bilateral Per2Luc expression in the ventral hypothalamus, corresponding to the SCN. By E14.5, 45% of SCN were circadian (5 of 11 SCN from 4 litters; Fig. 1). Notably, some E14.5 explants (n = 4 of 11; Movie 2) also displayed no rhythmic Per2Luc expression outside the SCN in the ventricular zone of the dorsal hypothalamus. By E15.5, no hypothalamic explants showed high PER2 expression outside the SCN region and nearly all SCN were circadian (Fig. 1; Movie 3; n = 11 of 12 E15 SCN from 4 litters, 7 of 7 E17 SCN from 2 litters, and 5 of 6 P2 SCN from 1 litter). We conclude that PER2 expression is localized to the SCN and becomes circadian on E14.5.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Circadian rhythms in the SCN during development. Long-term, real-time recordings of PER2 expression from SCN harvested after E14.5 showed reliable circadian periods between 18 and 32 h. A, Representative records of Per2Luc bioluminescence from SCN starting on the day they were explanted. Note the weak circadian oscillations that were found in some E14.5 SCN. Insets, Two representative SCN from each age. Some SCN harvested at E13.5 expressed Per2Luc above the SCN region along the ventricular zone of dorsal hypothalamus (Extra SCN, blue arrowhead; n = 5/8). All others harvested at this age and older reliably expressed high levels of PER2 in the bilateral SCN (red arrow). Scale bar: 10 px, 300 μm. B, Nearly all SCN expressed significant circadian rhythms when harvested on or after E15.5 (top), with periods close to 24 h (mean ± SEM; middle) and durations of daily Per2Luc expression above the mean close to 12 h (alpha; mean ± SEM; bottom; p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD). Note, eight slices were examined at E13.5, however, we excluded five because they did not express detectable PER2 in the SCN region.

Movie 1.

Movie 1. Time-lapse movie of PER2 expression from SCN explanted at E13.5. Note that, at E13.5, the bilateral SCN region had little to no PER2 expression and no circadian rhythms. At this stage, the bilateral ventricular zone of the dorsal hypothalamus had high PER2 levels. PER2 expression increased in the E14.5 SCN, decreased in the dorsal hypothalamus, and showed circadian rhythms when explanted on or after E15.5. A daily dorsal-to-ventral wave of PER2 appeared around P2.

Movie 2.

Time-lapse movie of PER2 expression from SCN explanted at E14.5. Note the increased expression in the SCN and decreased expression in the dorsal hypothalamus.

Movie 3.

Time-lapse movie of PER2 expression from SCN explanted at E15.5. The bilateral SCN showed circadian rhythms when explanted on or after E15.5.

We next developed methods to culture and image the embryonic SCN for at least 5 d. From these movies, we quantified local circadian rhythms where each pixel included ∼10 or fewer cells (Fig. 2A,B). We found the fraction of circadian pixels (cells) increased approximately sevenfold from E14.5 (Fig. 2C,D; 0.10 ± 0.07, mean ± SEM; n = 11 SCN from 4 litters) to E15.5 [0.72 ± 0.11; n = 9 SCN from 4 litters; *p < 0.05, one-way Kruskal–Wallis H(3) = 10.62, with post hoc Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD)]. Nearly all regions were circadian in SCN explanted on E17.5 (0.96 ± 0.03; n = 4 SCN from 2 litters) and postnatal day 2 (P2, 0.97 ± 0.02; n = 3 SCN from 1 litter). The developmental increase in the number of circadian regions correlated with an increase in circadian period in the SCN (Fig. 3A,B). We conclude that a small number of SCN cells initiate endogenous circadian rhythmicity by E14.5, and by E15.5 SCN cells are rhythmic throughout the SCN.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Embryonic SCN cells express PER2 rhythmically beginning ∼E14.5 in vitro. A, Heat maps of two SCN explanted at each developmental stage show circadian pixels based on Lomb–Scargle periodogram (power > p < 0.05) and cosinor analysis (correlation coefficient >0.6). We therefore report results only from periodogram analyses for simplicity. B, Representative Per2Luc bioluminescence images of the same SCN explants (1 h integration, 2 × 2 binning). Scale bar: 10 px, 300 μm. C, Representative Per2Luc bioluminescence recordings from single rhythmic pixels from SCN cultured at different embryonic stages. Note the competence of the E15.5 SCN to generate and sustain circadian rhythms in PER2 protein expression. D, The fraction of circadian pixels in each SCN (mean ± SEM) was higher for explants at E15.5 and older [*p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD; n = at least 3 SCN at each age where age is reported as days post-mating (E0.5) and post-birth (E20.5 = P0)].

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Circadian period and precision of SCN cells increased with development. A, Heat maps from representative SCN show the mean period over 5 d of recording. B, The fraction of rhythmic pixels correlated with an increase in the mean SCN period (least-squares linear regression: p = 0.00019, Pearson's r = 0.74. SCN with <5 circadian pixels were considered arrhythmic and excluded from this analysis; E14.5: diamonds, n = 6 of 11; E15.5: circles, n = 9 of 9; E17.5: triangles, n = 4 of 4; P2: squares, n = 3 of 3). C, Representative mean cycle-to-cycle variability heat maps show the increase in circadian precision with age. Scale bar, 150 μm. D, The average variability of the daily period across all rhythmic pixels within each isolated SCN inversely correlated with the fraction of circadian cells (least-squares linear regression: p = 0.0006, Pearson's r = −0.70; symbols as in B), SCN with <5 circadian pixels were considered arrhythmic and excluded from this analysis.

To determine the precision of SCN rhythms during development, we measured the cycle-to-cycle difference in period for each pixel within the fetal SCN over 3 d of the recording. Interestingly the increase in the number of circadian oscillators correlated with an increase in circadian precision (Fig. 3C,D), suggesting that addition of circadian cells lengthens and stabilizes period in the SCN.

The phase wave typical of adult SCN appears ∼P2

In adults, PER2 expression progresses as a daily wave from dorsal to ventral across the SCN (Yan and Okamura, 2002; Quintero et al., 2003; Yamaguchi et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2011). We examined when this spatiotemporal patterning of circadian expression arises in the SCN. To do so, we identified the times of daily peak PER2 in each pixel of the SCN and tested for spatial organization of expression. We found reliable daily waves of PER2 from the dorsal to ventral SCN by P2, but not at earlier developmental stages (Movies 4, 5; Fig. 4). We conclude that phase relationships among SCN cells continue to mature after birth.

Movie 4.

Time-lapse movie of PER2 expression from SCN explanted at E17.5. Note the high amplitude, in-phase circadian rhythms across the SCN.

Movie 5.

Time-lapse movie of PER2 expression from SCN explanted at P2. Note the appearance of a daily dorsal-to-ventral wave of PER2 across the SCN.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

The phase wave of PER2 expression in the SCN appeared only after birth. A, Heat maps of the time of peak PER2 expression across representative SCN. Note the dorsal-to-ventral distribution across the cells of the P2 SCN. Scale bar, 300 μm. B, Radial distribution of peak times revealed a core-shell structure in the P2, but not younger SCN explants. We compared the average differences in the times of peak PER2 expression as a function of distance from the ventral margin of each SCN with a null distribution of randomly shuffled peak times (shaded area = 95% CI for mean peak time calculated from 10,000 resamples). At P2, PER2 peaked significantly later in the ventral core than the dorsal shell, as seen in this representative example.

Onset of synchrony and intercellular communication within the SCN

Synchronous circadian oscillations in the SCN are required to coordinate daily rhythms in behavior (Schwartz et al., 1987; Aton et al., 2005; Ohta et al., 2005). To test how synchrony develops, we measured the cycle-to-cycle variability in period length and the synchrony index (SI), a quantity that ranges from 1.0 (all oscillators peak together) to 0.0 (all cells peak at uniformly different times of day) from 5 d of recording. We found that synchrony tends to increase between E14.5 (Fig. 5; SI = 0.80 ± 0.5, n = 6 SCN) and E15.5 (SI = 0.87 ± 0.05, n = 9 SCN) reaching a maximum ∼E17.5 (SI = 0.91 ± 0.02, n = 4) and P2 (SI = 0.94 ± 0.02, n = 3 SCN; 1 unilateral due to changes during recording between halves). Although there is no significant differences in the SI between ages, SI was positively correlated with the fraction of SCN cells displaying daily rhythms, indicating that intercellular synchrony is developed simultaneously with increased endogenously generated cellular oscillation (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

The synchrony between SCN cells increased and became more stable as the fraction of circadian cells increased. A, Representative traces of the synchronization index (also called the Kuramato order parameter or Rayleigh statistic, r) among regions within the cultured SCN at different ages. B, The average synchronization index of SCN slices (mean ± SEM; 24 h excluded from either end of analysis) did not reliably increase with age, but (C) correlated with the fraction of circadian cells in the SCN (symbols as in Fig. 3; least-squares linear regression: p = 0.004, Pearson's r = 0.61, n = at least 3 SCN at each age).

We next examined the signaling pathways that could enable synchronization of SCN cells starting ∼E15.5. VIP signaling is necessary for coordinated circadian rhythms among SCN cells and in behavior of adult mice (Harmar et al., 2002; Colwell et al., 2003; Aton et al., 2005; Maywood et al., 2006; Ciarleglio et al., 2009). We measured the levels of VIP, and its cognate receptor, VPAC2R, by immunocytochemistry between days E14.5 and P2 (Fig. 6). We found VIP (12.5 ± 2.3, n = 7) and VPAC2R [15.0 ± 5.6 relative optical density (ROD), n = 6] were detectable postnatally above baseline (immunolabeling in the P2 SCN of Vip−/− = 2.1 ± 0.7 ROD, n = 5 brains; Vipr2−/− = 3.8 ± 2.1 ROD, n = 5, mean ± SEM), but not earlier stages. To further explore this surprising result, we found that a VIP antagonist did not affect synchrony of the E15.5 SCN (Fig. 7). Consistent with prior publications, we found that addition of the VPAC2R antagonist reduced the fraction of circadian cells in the isolated adult SCN to 30% from 84% (n = 1 adult SCN; Cutler et al., 2003; Aton et al., 2005). We conclude that VIP and its receptor VPAC2R appear in the SCN after the initiation of circadian rhythms and are not required for circadian synchrony among embryonic SCN cells.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

VIP and VPAC2R expression matured in the postnatal SCN. A, Immunostaining intensity (mean relative optical density ± SEM; n = 9, 5, 7, 6, 7 and 7 brains at each age, respectively) of VIP in the SCN was significant by P2 compared with Vip knock-out controls (n = 5; *p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD). B, Immunostaining intensity (mean ± SEM) of VPAC2R (n = 6, 6, 5, 5, 7, and 6 brains, respectively) was significant by P0 compared with Vipr2 knock-out controls (n = 5; *p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD). C, Representative coronal SCN sections show the VIP (left) and VPAC2R (right) immunoreactivity at different ages. Scale bar, 200 μm.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Antagonists of GABA or VIP signaling, gap junctions or neuronal firing did not disrupt circadian synchrony in the developing SCN. Drugs applied during the first day of culture of E15.5 SCN explants did not change (A) the fraction of pixels with circadian Per2Luc (gray bars show the means across all SCN recorded at each developmental stage), or (B) the mean sync index over the 5 d of recording. C, The synchronization index within a representative cultured E15.5 SCN treated with Veh (Vehicle), Gabazine (Gz; 100 μm), MEC (10 μm), VIP antagonist (200 nm; PG-99465), or TTX (2.5 μm).

We then performed further pharmacological experiments to test whether GABA and/or gap junctions, other candidate coupling mechanisms, might drive synchrony in the SCN before VIP expression begins. Remarkably, antagonists against either or both GABA and gap junctions did not reduce the synchrony index of the E15.5 SCN (Fig. 7).

Discussion

Our results indicate that E15.5 is a critical time in the maturation of the SCN. Real-time imaging revealed that the clock gene, PER2, appears on E14.5 in the SCN and ∼10% of SCN cells are weakly circadian. By E15.5, nearly all cells within the SCN develop precise circadian rhythms. The cells of the E15.5 SCN are thus competent circadian oscillators. Previous work related this age with the end of neurogenesis (Shimada and Nakamura, 1973; Kabrita and Davis, 2008; Shimogori et al., 2010). At this age the expression of transcription factors as Lhx1 and RORα have a wider distribution across the SCN (VanDunk et al., 2011). Interestingly, RORα is a positive regulator of Bmal1 expression (Sato et al., 2004), Bmal1 is an essential transcription factor in circadian rhythmogenesis and activator of Per gene expression (Hastings et al., 2014; Takahashi, 2017). In adults, RORα knock-outs showed slight behavioral abnormalities in circadian rhythms. We therefore hypothesize that cell autonomous expression of RORα or another factor at E15.5 induces the onset of widespread, sustained circadian oscillations in SCN cells.

Studies using stem cells showed gradual development of circadian oscillations after inducing differentiation with retinoic acid (Yagita et al., 2010; Inada et al., 2014), suggesting that circadian rhythms can be initiated without direct maternal input early during differentiation. Consistent with a prior publication (Landgraf et al., 2015), we found little to no evidence that SCN cells become circadian spontaneously in vitro. For example, SCN explanted on 13.5 were arrhythmic and did not show an increase in the fraction of rhythmic pixels over the course of the experiment. SCN isolated at E14.5 or E15.5 similarly did not show changes in the amplitude, period, variability, or fraction of circadian cells during 7 d of recording. Although we cannot rule out that arrhythmic, fetal SCN cells cultured >7 d might develop daily cycling, our results indicate that the transition from arrhythmic to circadian is rapid and likely requires signals from outside the fetal SCN.

We found no circadian rhythms at E13.5, a small fraction of cells expressed noisy circadian rhythms at E14.5 and nearly all cells were circadian by E15.5. Notably, we found that PER2 was first expressed outside the SCN. At E14.5, extra-SCN PER2 expression was high and occasionally circadian. This extra-SCN expression diminishes by E15.5. It is not clear whether these cells move into the SCN or remain in the dorsal hypothalamus while reducing their PER2 expression. Inclusion of these extra-SCN regions in explants could explain the discrepancy between the two studies that reported the onset of PER2 daily oscillations in hypothalamic explants at E13 or E15 (Wreschnig et al., 2014; Landgraf et al., 2015). Importantly, the correlations in the increasing fraction of rhythmic cells, increasing circadian period and increasing intercellular and intracellular period precision during this time could reflect the consequences of cell–cell communication (Webb et al., 2009) and/or maturation of molecular components for circadian rhythm generation (VanDunk et al., 2011; Ono et al., 2016). Previous studies demonstrated that embryonic SCN have a strong phase-setting in response to perturbations such as surgical isolation (Wreschnig et al., 2014; Landgraf et al., 2015). Together, these data suggest that SCN cells become intrinsically circadian between E14.5 and E15.5. The presence of a functional circadian clock early in development may indicate the importance of precisely coordinating processes in the fetus such as cell division and differentiation, which are adversely affected in Clock mutant mice (Du Pré et al., 2014; Inada et al., 2014; Kobayashi et al., 2015).

The SCN in adult mice displays a dorsal to ventral phase wave in clock gene expression (Yan and Okamura, 2002; Quintero et al., 2003; Yamaguchi et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2011). Because this phase wave is not a fixed property (e.g., can adopt a different pattern after a temperature manipulation in vitro (Jeong et al., 2016), it is important to consider whether the results from the isolated SCN reflect its in vivo circadian properties. Critically, our results indicate that under constant conditions, the SCN phase wave first appears after birth. Because we isolated SCN at the same time of day, regardless of developmental age, we conclude that, although surgery can alter circadian phase (Wreschnig et al., 2014; Landgraf et al., 2015), it is unlikely to initiate rhythms in the fetal SCN or the spatial wave seen in the more mature SCN. This postnatal maturation of this SCN network likely involves synaptogenesis which begins ∼P2 when we found the onset of the phase wave (Bedont and Blackshaw, 2015). It will be intriguing to map the synaptic network topology that contributes to the phase relationships among SCN cells (Abel et al., 2016; Buijink et al., 2016).

Though the network continues to mature after birth, we found that intercellular synchrony is achieved much earlier. A prior report found that surgery can reset rhythms in the fetal SCN (Landgraf et al., 2015). Here, we found that synchrony of E14.5 and immature E15.5 SCN decreased over the recording, indicating weak or no synchronization between cells. Previous studies also relate an increase in the period variability with a loss of synchrony between cells (Honma et al., 2004; Webb et al., 2009). Our data showed an increase in synchrony by E15.5 (Fig. 5) corresponding to a decrease in cycle-to-cycle period variability, supporting this hypothesis. In adults, VIP and its receptor VPAC2R play a critical role in synchronizing oscillators in the SCN (Harmar et al., 2002; Colwell et al., 2003; Aton et al., 2005; Maywood et al., 2006; Ciarleglio et al., 2009). Although the expression of VIP mRNAs has been detected at E18 in rat (Ban et al., 1997; Houdek and Sumová, 2014) and VIP protein expression has been studied during postnatal ages (Herzog et al., 2000), our results show that the protein is not detectable by immunochemistry before birth. Interestingly, embryonic SCN explants from mice lacking VIP maintain circadian oscillations at the tissue level (Wreschnig et al., 2014). Moreover, our results demonstrate that synchrony occurs at E15.5, before the expression of VIP or receptor VPAC2R. That the exogenous application of VIP antagonist does not decrease synchrony suggests that other signals are likely involved in sustaining synchrony before the presence of VIP. There is evidence that dopamine, melatonin, or rhythmic feeding may be involved in establishing synchrony between the mother and fetal SCN to coordinate rhythmic cellular processes (Davis and Mannion, 1988; Weaver and Reppert, 1989; Viswanathan et al., 1994). The dopamine pathway in particular merits further investigation as a potential mechanism driving synchrony in the fetal SCN.

The increase in synchrony in the SCN at E15.5 does coincide with Lhx1 expression across the SCN (VanDunk et al., 2011). This transcription factor is important for the expression of diverse neuropeptide coupling signals aside from VIP, such as GRP or AVP (Bedont et al., 2014). Because these signals can mediate the synchrony in adults (Brown et al., 2005; Maywood et al., 2011) and in postnatal ages (Ono et al., 2016), they are candidates for mediating SCN synchrony in embryonic development. In rats the first synapses appear in perinatal ages and the sharp increase between P4 and P10 (Moore and Bernstein, 1989) suggests that other mechanisms could mediate synchrony before synapse formation. Gap junctions have recently been shown to not contribute to circadian synchrony in the adult SCN (Diemer et al., 2017). Our results, with a blocker of gap junctions, further indicate that they do not play a role in establishing synchrony during SCN development. We conclude that cellular circadian oscillations occur simultaneously with the onset of synchrony by unknown mechanisms.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by postdoctoral fellowship 237875 Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), the March of Dimes Center for Prematurity, and NINDS Grant 095367. We thank members of the Herzog laboratory for valuable discussions.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Erik D. Herzog, Department of Biology, Box 1137, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899. herzog{at}wustl.edu

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abel JH,
    2. Meeker K,
    3. Granados-Fuentes D,
    4. St John PC,
    5. Wang TJ,
    6. Bales BB,
    7. Doyle FJ 3rd.,
    8. Herzog ED,
    9. Petzold LR
    (2016) Functional network inference of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:4512–4517. doi:10.1073/pnas.1521178113 pmid:27044085
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Ansari N,
    2. Agathagelidis M,
    3. Lee C,
    4. Korf HW,
    5. von Gall C
    (2009) Differential maturation of circadian rhythms in clock gene proteins in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and the pars tuberalis during mouse ontogeny. Eur J Neurosci 29:477–489. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06605.x pmid:19222558
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Aton SJ,
    2. Colwell CS,
    3. Harmar AJ,
    4. Waschek J,
    5. Herzog ED
    (2005) Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide mediates circadian rhythmicity and synchrony in mammalian clock neurons. Nat Neurosci 8:476–483. doi:10.1038/nn1419 pmid:15750589
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ban Y,
    2. Shigeyoshi Y,
    3. Okamura H
    (1997) Development of vasoactive intestinal peptide mRNA rhythm in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neurosci 17:3920–3931. pmid:9133410
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Bedont JL,
    2. Blackshaw S
    (2015) Constructing the suprachiasmatic nucleus: a watchmaker's perspective on the central clockworks. Front Syst Neurosci 9:74. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00074 pmid:26005407
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bedont JL,
    2. LeGates TA,
    3. Slat EA,
    4. Byerly MS,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Hu J,
    7. Rupp AC,
    8. Qian J,
    9. Wong GW,
    10. Herzog ED,
    11. Hattar S,
    12. Blackshaw S
    (2014) Lhx1 controls terminal differentiation and circadian function of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Cell Rep 7:609–622. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.060 pmid:24767996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Brown TM,
    2. Hughes AT,
    3. Piggins HD
    (2005) Gastrin-releasing peptide promotes suprachiasmatic nuclei cellular rhythmicity in the absence of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide VPAC2 receptor signaling. J Neurosci 25:11155–11164. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3821-05.2005 pmid:16319315
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Buijink MR,
    2. Almog A,
    3. Wit CB,
    4. Roethler O,
    5. Olde Engberink AH,
    6. Meijer JH,
    7. Garlaschelli D,
    8. Rohling JH,
    9. Michel S
    (2016) Evidence for weakened intercellular coupling in the mammalian circadian clock under long photoperiod. PloS One 11:e0168954. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168954 pmid:28006027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ciarleglio CM,
    2. Gamble KL,
    3. Axley JC,
    4. Strauss BR,
    5. Cohen JY,
    6. Colwell CS,
    7. McMahon DG
    (2009) Population encoding by circadian clock neurons organizes circadian behavior. J Neurosci 29:1670–1676. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3801-08.2009 pmid:19211874
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Clark DD,
    2. Gorman MR,
    3. Hatori M,
    4. Meadows JD,
    5. Panda S,
    6. Mellon PL
    (2013) Aberrant development of the suprachiasmatic nucleus and circadian rhythms in mice lacking the homeodomain protein Six6. J Biol Rhythms 28:15–25. doi:10.1177/0748730412468084 pmid:23382588
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Colwell CS,
    2. Michel S,
    3. Itri J,
    4. Rodriguez W,
    5. Tam J,
    6. Lelievre V,
    7. Hu Z,
    8. Liu X,
    9. Waschek JA
    (2003) Disrupted circadian rhythms in VIP- and PHI-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285:R939–R949. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00200.2003 pmid:12855416
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Cutler DJ,
    2. Haraura M,
    3. Reed HE,
    4. Shen S,
    5. Sheward WJ,
    6. Morrison CF,
    7. Marston HM,
    8. Harmar AJ,
    9. Piggins HD
    (2003) The mouse VPAC2 receptor confers suprachiasmatic nuclei cellular rhythmicity and responsiveness to vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in vitro. Eur J Neurosci 17:197–204. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02425.x pmid:12542655
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Davis FC,
    2. Mannion J
    (1988) Entrainment of hamster pup circadian rhythms by prenatal melatonin injections to the mother. Am J Physiol 255:R439–R448. pmid:3414839
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Diemer T,
    2. Landgraf D,
    3. Noguchi T,
    4. Pan H,
    5. Moreno JL,
    6. Welsh DK
    (2017) Cellular circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus remain coupled in the absence of connexin-36. Neuroscience 357:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.05.037 pmid:28576728
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Du Pré BC,
    2. Van Veen TA,
    3. Young ME,
    4. Vos MA,
    5. Doevendans PA,
    6. Van Laake LW
    (2014) Circadian rhythms in cell maturation. Physiology 29:72–83. doi:10.1152/physiol.00036.2013 pmid:24382873
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Evans JA,
    2. Gorman MR
    (2016) In synch but not in step: circadian clock circuits regulating plasticity in daily rhythms. Neuroscience 320:259–280. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.01.072 pmid:26861419
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Evans JA,
    2. Leise TL,
    3. Castanon-Cervantes O,
    4. Davidson AJ
    (2011) Intrinsic regulation of spatiotemporal organization within the suprachiasmatic nucleus. PloS One 6:e15869. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015869 pmid:21249213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Harmar AJ,
    2. Marston HM,
    3. Shen S,
    4. Spratt C,
    5. West KM,
    6. Sheward WJ,
    7. Morrison CF,
    8. Dorin JR,
    9. Piggins HD,
    10. Reubi JC,
    11. Kelly JS,
    12. Maywood ES,
    13. Hastings MH
    (2002) The VPAC(2) receptor is essential for circadian function in the mouse suprachiasmatic nuclei. Cell 109:497–508. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00736-5 pmid:12086606
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Hastings MH,
    2. Brancaccio M,
    3. Maywood ES
    (2014) Circadian pacemaking in cells and circuits of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neuroendocrinol 26:2–10. doi:10.1111/jne.12125 pmid:24329967
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Herzog ED,
    2. Grace MS,
    3. Harrer C,
    4. Williamson J,
    5. Shinohara K,
    6. Block GD
    (2000) The role of Clock in the developmental expression of neuropeptides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Comp Neurol 424:86–98. doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20000814)424:1%3C86::AID-CNE7%3E3.0.CO;2-W pmid:10888741
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Herzog ED,
    2. Kiss IZ,
    3. Mazuski C
    (2015) Measuring synchrony in the mammalian central circadian circuit. Methods Enzymol 552:3–22. doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2014.10.042 pmid:25707270
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Honma S,
    2. Nakamura W,
    3. Shirakawa T,
    4. Honma K
    (2004) Diversity in the circadian periods of single neurons of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus depends on nuclear structure and intrinsic period. Neurosci Lett 358:173–176. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.01.022 pmid:15039109
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Houdek P,
    2. Sumová A
    (2014) In Vivo Initiation of Clock Gene Expression Rhythmicity in Fetal Rat Suprachiasmatic Nuclei. PLoS One 9.
  24. ↵
    1. Hunter JD
    (2007) Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 9:90–95. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Hut RA,
    2. Beersma DG
    (2011) Evolution of time-keeping mechanisms: early emergence and adaptation to photoperiod. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:2141–2154. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0409 pmid:21690131
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Inada Y,
    2. Uchida H,
    3. Umemura Y,
    4. Nakamura W,
    5. Sakai T,
    6. Koike N,
    7. Yagita K
    (2014) Cell and tissue-autonomous development of the circadian clock in mouse embryos. FEBS Lett 588:459–465. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.12.007 pmid:24374345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Jeong B,
    2. Hong JH,
    3. Kim H,
    4. Choe HK,
    5. Kim K,
    6. Lee KJ
    (2016) Multi-stability of circadian phase wave within early postnatal suprachiasmatic nucleus. Sci Rep 6:21463. doi:10.1038/srep21463 pmid:26891917
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Jones E,
    2. Oliphant T,
    3. Peterson P
    (2014) SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python. http://www.scipy.org/
  29. ↵
    1. Kabrita CS,
    2. Davis FC
    (2008) Development of the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus: determination of time of cell origin and spatial arrangements within the nucleus. Brain Res 1195:20–27. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.020 pmid:18201688
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Kobayashi Y,
    2. Ye Z,
    3. Hensch TK
    (2015) Clock genes control cortical critical period timing. Neuron 86:264–275. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.036 pmid:25801703
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Kováciková Z,
    2. Sládek M,
    3. Bendová Z,
    4. Illnerová H,
    5. Sumová A
    (2006) Expression of clock and clock-driven genes in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus during late fetal and early postnatal development. J Biol Rhythms 21:140–148. doi:10.1177/0748730405285876 pmid:16603678
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kuramoto Y
    (2003) Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence. New York: Springer.
  33. ↵
    1. Landgraf D,
    2. Achten C,
    3. Dallmann F,
    4. Oster H
    (2015) Embryonic development and maternal regulation of murine circadian clock function. Chronobiol Int 32:416–427. doi:10.3109/07420528.2014.986576 pmid:25431080
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Leise TL
    (2015) Wavelet-based analysis of circadian behavioral rhythms. Methods Enzymol 551:95–119. doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2014.10.011 pmid:25662453
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Maywood ES,
    2. Reddy AB,
    3. Wong GK,
    4. O'Neill JS,
    5. O'Brien JA,
    6. McMahon DG,
    7. Harmar AJ,
    8. Okamura H,
    9. Hastings MH
    (2006) Synchronization and maintenance of timekeeping in suprachiasmatic circadian clock cells by neuropeptidergic signaling. Curr Biol 16:599–605. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.023 pmid:16546085
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Maywood ES,
    2. Chesham JE,
    3. O'Brien JA,
    4. Hastings MH
    (2011) A diversity of paracrine signals sustains molecular circadian cycling in suprachiasmatic nucleus circuits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:14306–14311. doi:10.1073/pnas.1101767108 pmid:21788520
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Mohawk JA,
    2. Takahashi JS
    (2011) Cell autonomy and synchrony of suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian oscillators. Trends Neurosci 34:349–358. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.05.003 pmid:21665298
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Moore RY,
    2. Bernstein ME
    (1989) Synaptogenesis in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus demonstrated by electron microscopy and synapsin I immunoreactivity. J Neurosci 9:2151–2162. pmid:2498469
    OpenUrlAbstract
  39. ↵
    1. Ohta H,
    2. Yamazaki S,
    3. McMahon DG
    (2005) Constant light desynchronizes mammalian clock neurons. Nat Neurosci 8:267–269. doi:10.1038/nn1395 pmid:15746913
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Ono D,
    2. Honma S,
    3. Honma K
    (2016) Differential roles of AVP and VIP signaling in the postnatal changes of neural networks for coherent circadian rhythms in the SCN. Sci Adv 2:e1600960. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600960 pmid:27626074
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Pérez F,
    2. Granger BE
    (2007) IPython: a system for interactive scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 9:21–29. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.53
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Pittendrigh CS
    (1960) Circadian rhythms and the circadian organization of living systems. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 25:159–184. doi:10.1101/SQB.1960.025.01.015 pmid:13736116
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Quintero JE,
    2. Kuhlman SJ,
    3. McMahon DG
    (2003) The biological clock nucleus: a multiphasic oscillator network regulated by light. J Neurosci 23:8070–8076. pmid:12954869
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Reppert SM,
    2. Schwartz WJ
    (1983) Maternal coordination of the fetal biological clock in utero. Science 220:969–971. doi:10.1126/science.6844923 pmid:6844923
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Reppert SM,
    2. Schwartz WJ
    (1984) The suprachiasmatic nuclei of the fetal rat: characterization of a functional circadian clock using 14C-labeled deoxyglucose. J Neurosci 4:1677–1682. pmid:6737036
    OpenUrlAbstract
  46. ↵
    1. Ruf T
    (1999) The Lomb-Scargle periodogram in biological rhythm research: analysis of incomplete and unequally spaced time-series. Biol Rhythm Res 30:178–201. doi:10.1076/brhm.30.2.178.1422
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. Sato TK,
    2. Panda S,
    3. Miraglia LJ,
    4. Reyes TM,
    5. Rudic RD,
    6. McNamara P,
    7. Naik KA,
    8. FitzGerald GA,
    9. Kay SA,
    10. Hogenesch JB
    (2004) A functional genomics strategy reveals Rora as a component of the mammalian circadian clock. Neuron 43:527–537. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.018 pmid:15312651
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Schneider CA,
    2. Rasband WS,
    3. Eliceiri KW
    (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 pmid:22930834
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Schwartz WJ,
    2. Gross RA,
    3. Morton MT
    (1987) The suprachiasmatic nuclei contain a tetrodotoxin-resistant circadian pacemaker. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:1694–1698. doi:10.1073/pnas.84.6.1694 pmid:3470750
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Seabold S,
    2. Perktold J
    (2010) Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference.
  51. ↵
    1. Shibata S,
    2. Moore RY
    (1987) Development of neuronal activity in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Brain Res 431:311–315. pmid:3040191
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Shimada M,
    2. Nakamura T
    (1973) Time of neuron in mouse hypothalamic nuclei. Exp Neurol 41:163–173. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(73)90187-8 pmid:4743483
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Shimogori T,
    2. Lee DA,
    3. Miranda-Angulo A,
    4. Yang Y,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Jiang L,
    7. Yoshida AC,
    8. Kataoka A,
    9. Mashiko H,
    10. Avetisyan M,
    11. Qi L,
    12. Qian J,
    13. Blackshaw S
    (2010) A genomic atlas of mouse hypothalamic development. Nat Neurosci 13:767–775. doi:10.1038/nn.2545 pmid:20436479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Shimomura H,
    2. Moriya T,
    3. Sudo M,
    4. Wakamatsu H,
    5. Akiyama M,
    6. Miyake Y,
    7. Shibata S
    (2001) Differential daily expression of Per1 and Per2 mRNA in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of fetal and early postnatal mice. Eur J Neurosci 13:687–693. doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2000.01438.x pmid:11207804
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Sládek M,
    2. Sumová A,
    3. Kováciková Z,
    4. Bendová Z,
    5. Laurinová K,
    6. Illnerová H
    (2004) Insight into molecular core clock mechanism of embryonic and early postnatal rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:6231–6236. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401149101 pmid:15069203
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Takahashi JS
    (2017) Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nat Rev Genetics 18:164–179. doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.150 pmid:27990019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. VanDunk C,
    2. Hunter LA,
    3. Gray PA
    (2011) Development, maturation, and necessity of transcription factors in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neurosci 31:6457–6467. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5385-10.2011 pmid:21525287
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Viswanathan N,
    2. Weaver DR,
    3. Reppert SM,
    4. Davis FC
    (1994) Entrainment of the fetal hamster circadian pacemaker by prenatal injections of the dopamine agonist SKF 38393. J Neurosci 14:5393–5398. pmid:7916044
    OpenUrlAbstract
  59. ↵
    1. Wang MH,
    2. Chen N,
    3. Wang JH
    (2014) The coupling features of electrical synapses modulate neuronal synchrony in hypothalamic superchiasmatic nucleus. Brain Res 1550:9–17. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.007 pmid:24440632
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Weaver DR,
    2. Reppert SM
    (1989) Periodic feeding of SCN-lesioned pregnant rats entrains the fetal biological clock. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 46:291–296. doi:10.1016/0165-3806(89)90292-7 pmid:2720961
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Webb AB,
    2. Angelo N,
    3. Huettner JE,
    4. Herzog ED
    (2009) Intrinsic, nondeterministic circadian rhythm generation in identified mammalian neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:16493–16498. doi:10.1073/pnas.0902768106 pmid:19805326
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Wreschnig D,
    2. Dolatshad H,
    3. Davis FC
    (2014) Embryonic development of circadian oscillations in the mouse hypothalamus. J Biol Rhythms 29:299–310. doi:10.1177/0748730414545086 pmid:25238858
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Yagita K,
    2. Horie K,
    3. Koinuma S,
    4. Nakamura W,
    5. Yamanaka I,
    6. Urasaki A,
    7. Shigeyoshi Y,
    8. Kawakami K,
    9. Shimada S,
    10. Takeda J,
    11. Uchiyama Y
    (2010) Development of the circadian oscillator during differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:3846–3851. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913256107 pmid:20133594
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Yamaguchi S,
    2. Isejima H,
    3. Matsuo T,
    4. Okura R,
    5. Yagita K,
    6. Kobayashi M,
    7. Okamura H
    (2003) Synchronization of cellular clocks in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Science 302:1408–1412. doi:10.1126/science.1089287 pmid:14631044
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Yan L,
    2. Okamura H
    (2002) Gradients in the circadian expression of Per1 and Per2 genes in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Eur J Neurosci 15:1153–1162. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01955.x pmid:11982626
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Yoo SH,
    2. Yamazaki S,
    3. Lowrey PL,
    4. Shimomura K,
    5. Ko CH,
    6. Buhr ED,
    7. Siepka SM,
    8. Hong HK,
    9. Oh WJ,
    10. Yoo O,
    11. Menaker M,
    12. Takahashi JS
    (2004) PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:5339–5346. doi:10.1073/pnas.0308709101 pmid:14963227
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 38 (6)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 38, Issue 6
7 Feb 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ontogeny of Circadian Rhythms and Synchrony in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Ontogeny of Circadian Rhythms and Synchrony in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
Vania Carmona-Alcocer, John H. Abel, Tao C. Sun, Linda R. Petzold, Francis J. Doyle III, Carrie L. Simms, Erik D. Herzog
Journal of Neuroscience 7 February 2018, 38 (6) 1326-1334; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2006-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Ontogeny of Circadian Rhythms and Synchrony in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
Vania Carmona-Alcocer, John H. Abel, Tao C. Sun, Linda R. Petzold, Francis J. Doyle III, Carrie L. Simms, Erik D. Herzog
Journal of Neuroscience 7 February 2018, 38 (6) 1326-1334; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2006-17.2017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • clock genes
  • ontogeny
  • VIP

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Lumateperone Normalizes Pathological Levels of Acute Inflammation through Important Pathways Known to Be Involved in Mood Regulation
  • Estrous Cycle Mediates Midbrain Neuron Excitability Altering Social Behavior upon Stress
  • Chronic Ethanol Exposure Modulates Periaqueductal Gray to Extended Amygdala Dopamine Circuit
Show more Research Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • A Unique “Reversed” Migration of Neurons in the Developing Claustrum
  • Post-synaptic NMDA Receptor Expression Is Required for Visual Corticocollicular Projection Refinement in the Mouse Superior Colliculus
  • Spatiotemporal Developmental Gradient of Thalamic Morphology, Microstructure, and Connectivity fromthe Third Trimester to Early Infancy
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.