Abstract
Genetic defects in protein O-mannosyltransferase 1 (POMT1) and POMT2 underlie severe muscular dystrophies. POMT genes are evolutionarily conserved in metazoan organisms. In Drosophila, both male and female POMT mutants show a clockwise rotation of adult abdominal segments, suggesting a chirality of underlying pathogenic mechanisms. Here we described and analyzed a similar phenotype in POMT mutant embryos that shows left-handed body torsion. Our experiments demonstrated that coordinated muscle contraction waves are associated with asymmetric embryo rolling, unveiling a new chirality marker in Drosophila development. Using genetic and live-imaging approaches, we revealed that the torsion phenotype results from differential rolling and aberrant patterning of peristaltic waves of muscle contractions. Our results demonstrated that peripheral sensory neurons are required for normal contractions that prevent the accumulation of torsion. We found that POMT mutants show abnormal axonal connections of sensory neurons. POMT transgenic expression limited to sensory neurons significantly rescued the torsion phenotype, axonal connectivity defects, and abnormal contractions in POMT mutant embryos. Together, our data suggested that protein O-mannosylation is required for normal sensory feedback to control coordinated muscle contractions and body posture. This mechanism may shed light on analogous functions of POMT genes in mammals and help to elucidate the etiology of neurological defects in muscular dystrophies.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Protein O-mannosyltransferases (POMTs) are evolutionarily conserved in metazoans. Mutations in POMTs cause severe muscular dystrophies associated with pronounced neurological defects. However, neurological functions of POMTs remain poorly understood. We demonstrated that POMT mutations in Drosophila result in abnormal muscle contractions and cause embryo torsion. Our experiments uncovered a chirality of embryo movements and a unique POMT-dependent mechanism that maintains symmetry of a developing system affected by chiral forces. Furthermore, POMTs were found to be required for proper axon connectivity of sensory neurons, suggesting that O-mannosylation regulates the sensory feedback controlling muscle contractions. This novel POMT function in the peripheral nervous system may shed light on analogous functions in mammals and help to elucidate pathomechanisms of neurological abnormalities in muscular dystrophies.
Introduction
Protein O-mannosylation (POM) represents a prominent example of protein glycosylation with crucial biological functions (Moremen et al., 2012; Wells, 2013; Yoshida-Moriguchi and Campbell, 2015). Two protein O-mannosyltransferases (POMTs) that mediate POM, POMT1 and POMT2, are conserved in all animals. Enzymatic POM activity requires the formation of a complex between POMT1 and POMT2 that functions in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). POM affects the development and physiology of mammalian muscular and nervous systems, while genetic inactivation of POMT1 or POMT2 results in early embryonic lethality in mice (Willer et al., 2004; Martin, 2007; Hu et al., 2011; Freeze et al., 2015).
The best characterized O-mannosylation target is dystroglycan (Dg), a glycoprotein that serves as a cell membrane-spanning bridge linking the ECM and cytoskeleton (for review, see Barresi and Campbell, 2006; Yoshida-Moriguchi and Campbell, 2015). Defects in POM compromise interactions between Dg and its extracellular ligands, which causes congenital muscular dystrophies termed dystroglycanopathies (Godfrey et al., 2011). These dystrophies are associated with neurological abnormalities, including brain developmental defects, which indicates that POM has important functions in neural development (Mercuri and Muntoni, 2013). Recent studies have revealed that POM is present on many glycoproteins that can function in the nervous system, including cadherins, plexins, and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase ζ (RPTPζ; Vester-Christensen et al., 2013; Dwyer et al., 2015). Experiments in mouse models indicated that POM is required for integrity of the pial basement membrane and neuronal migration (Hu et al., 2011; Li et al., 2011). However, most studies have concentrated on POM-mediated regulation of Dg activity in muscles, while POM functions in the nervous system remain poorly understood.
Significant sequence conservation between Drosophila and mammalian POMTs suggests that POMT functions are conserved in animal evolution, from insects to mammals (Martín-Blanco and García-Bellido, 1996; Ichimiya et al., 2004; Lyalin et al., 2006). Indeed, previous studies demonstrated that Drosophila POMT1 and POMT2 [rotated abdomen (rt) and twisted (tw), respectively] show strong synergistic genetic interactions (Ichimiya et al., 2004; Lyalin et al., 2006). RT and TW proteins colocalize in the ER, and their simultaneous activity is required for O-mannosylation of Drosophila Dg in vitro and in vivo, indicating that RT and TW, similar to their mammalian counterparts, function together as a heteromeric enzymatic complex (Lyalin et al., 2006; Nakamura et al., 2010a). Mutations in rt, tw, and Dg result in muscle developmental defects, abnormal synaptic transmission, and age-dependent muscle degeneration (Martín-Blanco and García-Bellido, 1996; Haines et al., 2007; Shcherbata et al., 2007; Wairkar et al., 2008; Ueyama et al., 2010), the phenotypes also associated with human dystroglycanopathies (Mercuri and Muntoni, 2013). However, the pathogenic mechanisms in Drosophila POMT mutants are poorly understood. Interestingly, rt and tw mutants show misalignment of adult abdominal segments that causes the clockwise “abdomen rotation” phenotype, a unique example of a developmental defect associated with abnormal chirality (Martín-Blanco and García-Bellido, 1996; Lyalin et al., 2006). This phenotype was discovered in the Morgan laboratory in 1918 (Bridges and Morgan, 1923), yet its underlying mechanism still remains unexplained. Here we described a novel POMT embryonic phenotype associated with body torsion that is reminiscent of the abdomen rotation in adults. The torsion phenotype arises during peristaltic muscle contractions. Our analyses uncovered a directional rolling behavior of embryos inside the eggshell, which revealed a novel asymmetry in Drosophila development. We found that POMT mutations affect peripheral sensory neurons, coordination of muscle contractions, and dynamic chirality of body torsion caused by embryo rolling. Based on these data, we proposed a mechanism that explains how the defect in muscle contractions may cause the torsion phenotype.
Materials and Methods
Drosophila stocks and crosses.
The mutant alleles for rt and tw were previously described, as follows: tw1 is a hypomorphic allele; rt2, rtp, and rt571 are strong hypomorphic alleles that are close to amorphs (Martín-Blanco and García-Bellido, 1996; Lyalin et al., 2006); sensE2 is a loss-of-function allele (Nolo et al., 2000); and Dg086 is a null allele (Christoforou et al., 2008). Several transgenic insertions were obtained from different researchers: MHC-GAL4 was from Graeme Davis; DMEF2-GAL4 was received from Eric Olson; and MHC-GFP line was a gift from Cynthia Hughes. UAS-tw transgene was previously described (Lyalin et al., 2006). Other mutant and transgenic strains were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center at Indiana University. Unless indicated otherwise, embryos of either sex were included in all analyses, as our experiments, as well as studies by other groups, revealed no evidence of sex-specific phenotypes of POMT mutants.
Fluorescent staining and microscopy.
Embryos were dechorionated, fixed, and dissected manually from the vitelline membrane according to published protocols (Rothwell and Sullivan, 2000). They were stained with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated phalloidin (Invitrogen) using 1:200 dilution. Digital images were obtained using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescent microscope with the ApoTome module for optical sectioning. AxioVision and ImageJ software were used for 3D reconstruction and Z-projections of fluorescent samples.
First instar larvae expressing tdTomato or tdGFP in the Ppk pattern (Han et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2014), in a wild-type, tw, or rt mutant background, were collected. The CNS (brain lobes together with the ventral ganglion) was dissected, fixed in PBS with 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained with rabbit anti-dsRed or anti-GFP antibody (Clontech) in a 1:1000 dilution. Mouse anti-Fasciclin II (FasII) and anti-Repo antibodies [1D4 and 8D12 from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), respectively] were used in a 1:10 dilution. Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies were used as a secondary antibody in a 1:250 dilution. Stained samples were mounted on slides and imaged using the Zeiss Axioplan 2 Microscope using 40× magnification objective. To minimize potential errors, control and experimental samples were stained using the same master-mix of antibodies and imaged with the same settings for camera, illumination, and microscope. Commissural branch thickness was measured in stacks of optical sections with 1 μm step size using ImageJ for every branch in a given ventral nerve cord and averaged, and the collective average from a given genotype reported. Images were analyzed blindly without genotype information. Longitudinal tracts were scored by averaging the brightness of the spaces between commissural branches for a background brightness, and tracts were scored as “absent” when the brightness of the region where the tract was expected to be was <10% above background, as measured by ImageJ.
Flp-out analysis of individual axons.
A Flp-out approach for labeling individual class IV dendritic arborization (da) neurons was performed using previously described strategy (Grueber et al., 2007) with some modifications. Briefly, males of yw hsFlp; +; rtP/ /T(2;3)TSTL14, SM5:TM6B, Tb1 were crossed to 10XUAS>(FRT stop)>GFP-Myr; rt2 ppkGal4/TM3-KrGFP females. F1 progeny was collected as embryos for 17–20 h and given a heat shock at 34°C for 12 min to induce the expression of Flp recombinase. Then these embryos were allowed to develop until third instar at 25°C, and brains of yw hsFlp/10XUAS>(FRT stop)>GFP-Myr; rtP/rt2 ppkGal4 larvae were dissected, fixed, and incubated with primary mouse anti-GFP antibody (8H11, DSHB) at 1:100 dilution, followed by incubation with secondary goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen) antibody diluted 1:250. For wild-type control, the same genotype, but without rt mutation, was analyzed. Stained brains were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) and imaged using a Zeiss Axio Imager Fluorescence Microscope with ApoTome module for optical sectioning.
Live imaging of embryos.
A GFP-tagged myosin heavy chain (MHC) was expressed in wild-type, POMT mutant, and senseless mutant backgrounds. Embryos were staged according to (Pereanu et al., 2007). Stage 17 embryos with an air-filled trachea and no obvious midline misalignment were collected and placed on a slide with the dorsal appendages up. Muscle contractions were recorded using a Hamamtsu ORCA-Flash4.0 CMOS digital camera for 1–2 h using an X-Cite BDX LED with an emission maximum of 460 nm and an ET525/50 emission filter on a Zeiss Examiner D1 microscope. Videos were analyzed using ImageJ software. Rolling was assessed by measuring the average displacement of tracheal dorsal trunks produced by individual contractions. The dorsal midline angle was measured by selecting points halfway between left and right dorsal muscles, drawing a line connecting those points, and measuring its angle relative to the anterior—posterior (AP) axis. The position of the AP axis was estimated based on the position of the anterior and posterior tips of the embryo between contractions waves, when muscles do not show significant activity. Although embryos can slightly wiggle inside the embryo shell when muscles contract, in addition to rolling, they cannot significantly change their position because chorionic layers of the shell are rigid and the shell closely reflects the shape and volume of the embryo between muscle contractions. The posterior and anterior tips of the embryo are always located at posterior and anterior tips of the shell between muscle contractions, and thus the AP axis of the shell provides a truthful approximation of the embryo AP axis between contractions. Embryos with an absolute value of dorsal midline angle of >2° were scored as having torsion as the difference between wild-type and mutant embryos become statistically significant at this point (Fig. 1D). Embryos were scored as having no torsion when this angle was <2°. Left-handed and right-handed torsion phenotypes corresponded to positive and negative values of the dorsal midline angle, respectively.
For GFP intensity analysis, cross sections 5 μm wide and 25 μm apart each, were selected along the anterior–posterior body axis. A baseline for each cross section was established as the average intensity during the time between contraction waves. Muscle-shortening amplitude was estimated by an increase in GFP intensity that occurs as muscle contractions bring more GFP into the vicinity of focal area. The most anterior and posterior cross sections, as well as a cross section halfway between anterior and posterior ends of the embryo, were used for assessment of muscle contraction amplitude. Integrated fluorescence intensity was measured for every frame of each cross section and normalized to the baseline. Anterior intensity was divided by posterior intensity to produce a ratio.
UAS-GAL4-mediated rescue experiments and embryonic torsion scoring.
In experiments investigating the spatial requirements of POMT activity, the expression of a UAS-tw transgenic construct (Lyalin et al., 2006) was induced with each of the drivers described. All driver-mediated rescue experiments included controls, confirming that neither GAL4 drivers alone nor UAS-tw alone influence the mutant phenotype. All flies were reared at 25°C in a light- and humidity-controlled environment, as described previously (Islam et al., 2013).
Experimental design and statistical analysis.
Experiments were performed at least three times. N refers to the number of embryos or larvae of particular genotypes (Fig. 1; see also Fig. 4) or the number of individual axons with particular morphology (see Fig. 6). Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc comparisons for significance. For bar graphs and box plots, data for each bar or box in the graph were analyzed as a separate column. For the line graph in Figure 1D, data for each contraction number were compared across the three genotypes. In all figures, 1 and 2 asterisks represent p values of <0.05 and 0.01, respectively; NS indicates that no significant differences were found (p > 0.05). Details on statistical analysis are included in figure legends and text.
Results
POMT mutant embryos accumulate body torsion during peristaltic muscle contractions
Previous studies of rt and tw mutants have mostly concentrated on adult and larval stages, while the effect of POMT mutations on embryonic development has not been well characterized (Martín-Blanco and García-Bellido, 1996; Ichimiya et al., 2004; Haines et al., 2007; Ueyama et al., 2010). With the rationale that potential phenotypes of POMT mutants at early developmental stages could shed light more directly on pathological mechanisms associated with POM defects, we decided to focus on embryonic stages. We analyzed rt and tw mutant embryos and discovered that they have a prominent body posture defect manifested as a whole-body left-handed torsion (rotation of more anterior segments, relative to more posterior ones, in counterclockwise direction, as viewed from the posterior), which is reminiscent of the adult abdomen rotation phenotype (Fig. 1A). This “embryonic torsion” phenotype becomes pronounced at stage 17, the last stage of embryonic development. The penetrance of the phenotype in rt2/571 mutant embryos was found to be 32% (N = 19) at an early phase of stage 17 (stages 17a–d), and 100% (N = 24) at its last phase (stages 17e–f; stages are according to the study by Pereanu et al., 2007). This torsion persisted into the first instar larval stage with 90% penetrance but was almost entirely absent in second instar larvae. Similar results were obtained for tw1/tw1 mutants (Fig. 1B). No posture defects or any conspicuous muscle abnormalities were observed in stage 16 embryos (N = 84; Fig. 1A). Since the somatic musculature and epidermis are already formed at stage 16, these data suggested that the torsion phenotype may originate from abnormal muscle contractions rather than from a developmental defect of musculature or abnormal epidermal morphology. This scenario is also consistent with the fact that the torsion phenotype becomes prominent soon after the embryos initiate coordinated muscle contractions (Pereanu et al., 2007; Crisp et al., 2008).
To test more directly whether muscle contractions are involved in generating the embryo torsion phenotype, we used a live-imaging approach to analyze muscle contractions in embryos with muscles labeled by transgenically expressed MHC-GFP (Hughes and Thomas, 2007). Once embryos initiated peristaltic contractions, we measured the angle of the embryo dorsal midline, defined by equidistant position from muscles on the left and right sides of the embryo, relative to the AP axis before and after each contraction. We found that during embryonic contractions the midline remained essentially parallel to the AP axis in wild-type embryos, even though the midline could change its position within the shell when embryos undergo contractions. In mutants, the midline accumulated an angle, which revealed increasing left-handed torsion of embryos (Fig. 1C,D; Movies 1, 2, 3). These results demonstrated that the embryonic body torsion defect arises in mutants during peristaltic muscle contractions and also revealed a correlation between the increase of torsion and the number of contraction waves generated by mutant embryos, which suggested that contraction waves could induce torsion in mutant embryos.
Peristaltic muscle contractions induce chiral embryonic rolling within the eggshell
Before investigating further the link between contraction waves and the embryo torsion phenotype, we decided to characterize in more detail how embryos behave during peristaltic contractions. In both wild-type and POMT mutant embryos, peristaltic waves of contractions can propagate from posterior to anterior (forward waves) or from anterior to posterior (backward waves) ends of the embryo. We first focused on analyzing these waves in wild-type embryos. Upon close inspection of contraction waves, we discovered that the embryo rolls within its shell during these contractions. While rolling, wild-type embryos could maintain a straight body posture and their dorsal midline, in agreement with our previous observations, remained largely parallel to the AP axis. Notably, the direction of embryonic rolling correlated with the direction of the contraction wave, as forward and backward waves caused counterclockwise and clockwise rolling, respectively, when viewed from the posterior end of the embryo (Fig. 2A; Movies 4, 5). In other words, propagating waves of muscle contractions always induced left-handed rolling when viewed from the point of initiation. Thus, this observation uncovered a novel dynamic chirality in Drosophila. Interestingly, when measuring at a midpoint between anterior and posterior ends of the embryo, we found that the average distance rolled during any contraction is approximately the same, ∼6 μm, regardless of wave direction (Fig. 2B). Next, we analyzed the rolling behavior of POMT mutants. They also showed left-handed rolling, and the average distance they rolled in one wave of contractions was not significantly different from that of wild-type embryos (Fig. 2B).
Embryo torsion arises during abnormal alteration of muscle contraction waves
Wild-type embryos could roll over the course of several contractions while maintaining a straight body posture and having their dorsal midline essentially parallel to the embryo AP axis. POMT mutants, on the other hand, developed torsion as their anterior and posterior segments rolled differently and the dorsal midline accumulated an angle relative to the AP axis. A recent study demonstrated that damage of Eve interneurons could cause left–right (LR) asymmetry of muscle contractions and larval crawling defects (Heckscher et al., 2015), suggesting that a related pathomechanism might cause torsion in POMT mutant embryos. However, when we analyzed mutants, we could not find any significant left–right asymmetry of muscle contractions as the timing and amplitude of contraction on the left and right sides of the embryo were not significantly different, and mutants were not different from wild-type controls (Fig. 2C,D). These results, together with the fact that defects in Eve interneurons result in randomized rather than biased asymmetry in muscle coordination, suggested that a different mechanism underlies the embryo torsion phenotype.
We alternatively hypothesized that “differential rolling” of mutant embryo segments could play a part in producing torsion. Such differential rolling could arise from differences in the force that induce the rolling of different segments and depend on the amplitude of contractions at a particular segment. This assumption is consistent with the fact that rolling strictly correlates with contractions as it is induced only upon wave propagation but not between the waves. This hypothesis predicts that differential rolling can be associated with differences in contraction amplitude as a wave propagates along the embryo. Furthermore, since left-handed torsion in mutants is associated with greater rolling at the end of the wave, it is expected that mutants should show an increasing strength of contractions along wave propagation. We tested these predictions by analyzing single waves simply propagating from one end to the other, which we designated here as type 1 waves (Fig. 3A,B; Movie 6; also see discussion below). Surprisingly, we found that these waves decrease in amplitude on average as they progress in mutant as well as wild-type embryos, regardless of their direction of propagation (Fig. 3C,D). Thus, the differential rolling mechanism by itself is not able to explain the left-handed torsion of mutants. Moreover, assuming that rolling positively correlates with contraction amplitude, these simple waves are predicted to result in the accumulation of net right-handed body torsion in both mutant and wild-type genotypes. Indeed, when we correlated contractions with the change in the angle of the midline, we found that type 1 waves correspond to accumulation of right-handed torsion on average in both wild-type and POMT mutant genotypes, regardless of whether the wave propagated in the forward or reverse direction (Fig. 3E). These data seemingly contradicted the fact that over the course of multiple waves wild-type embryos maintain a straight body posture while mutants accumulate a left-handed torsion. To resolve this apparent conundrum, we performed a more detailed analysis of the pattern of contraction waves, which revealed that embryos occasionally generated a biphasic, rather than a simple, wave. During such waves (designated herein as type 2 waves) contractions initiated as a partial backward wave, which propagated until halting momentarily as a static overcontraction of a broad posterior region. This overcontraction did not relax until it was swept by the second phase, which propagated forward from the posterior end, often with increasing amplitude (Fig. 3A,B; Movie 7). Importantly, type 2 waves correlated with a change in the midline angle corresponding to the accumulation of left-handed torsion (Fig. 3F), which is consistent with the differential rolling mechanism and the fact that the amplitude of a type 2 wave increases on average during wave propagation (Fig. 3D). Our analysis indicated that type 1 waves constitute ∼73% of all waves in wild-type embryos on average, while the remaining ∼27% of coordinated contractions are type 2 waves. Mutant embryos, on the other hand, generate approximately equal numbers of type 1 and type 2 waves (Fig. 3G). These results suggest that type 2 waves normally serve as a compensatory mechanism to counteract the right-handed body torsion that would accumulate over the course of multiple type 1 waves. In POMT mutants, however, an abnormally high proportion of type 2 contractions results in the accumulation of a net left-handed torsion over time.
Body torsion arises in mutants with PNS defects
Abnormal coordination of muscle contractions and the failure to maintain body posture may be caused by defects in function of muscle and/or neurons, including PNS cells that were shown to be important for the generation of coordinated waves of muscle contractions (Suster and Bate, 2002; Hughes and Thomas, 2007; Song et al., 2007). To shed light on the cell-specific requirement of POMT activity for normal body posture, we applied a rescue strategy using UAS-GAL4-driven expression of a transgenic tw construct in tw mutants. We found that a pan-neuronal driver (ELAV-Gal4) and a driver specific for class IV da sensory neurons (Ppk-Gal4) were each able to significantly rescue the embryo torsion phenotype. On the other hand, three different muscle-specific drivers (DMEF2-GAL4, MHC-GAL4, and How-GAL4; Ranganayakulu et al., 1996; Schuster et al., 1996; Zaffran et al., 1997) could not mediate the rescue of body torsion (Fig. 4A). These results suggested that tw is required in neurons, and specifically in class IV da sensory neurons.
We hypothesized that POMTs function in the PNS to ensure a proper feedback from these cells to maintain normal body posture. This hypothesis predicts that PNS defects could result in an abnormal ratio of type 1:type 2 waves and cause torsion. To test this prediction, we examined embryos with significantly depleted PNS function caused by a defect in senseless (sens). Mutations in sens result in the loss of peripheral sensory neurons by stage 16 through cell-specific apoptosis (Nolo et al., 2000), thus impairing feedback from the PNS to the CNS in sens mutants. Although complete shutdown of sensory input halts peristaltic contractions entirely (Song et al., 2007), sens− embryos are still able to generate contraction waves, albeit with decreased frequency, presumably due to the fact that some da sensory neurons are still present in these embryos (Suster and Bate, 2002; Song et al., 2007). We analyzed sens− mutants and found that although they indeed generated fewer peristaltic contractions than wild-type embryos, individually these contractions were apparently normal type 1 or type 2 waves, with the same effects on rolling behavior and torsion as in wild-type embryos (Fig. 4B,C). However, different embryos generated type 1 and type 2 waves at highly variable ratios, with the proportion of type 1 waves ranging from ∼47% to 100% (Fig. 4D). These results are consistent with our hypothesis that sensory input can control the pattern of alternating type 1–type 2 contractions.
Furthermore, considering this variability of contraction patterns in sens mutants, our hypothesis predicts that some sens mutants should accumulate left-handed or right-handed torsion, depending on whether the proportion of type 1 waves they generate is substantially lower or higher than that observed in wild-type embryos (∼73% type 1; Figs. 3G, 4D), respectively. Indeed, when we analyzed the body posture of sens mutants, we found that ∼80% of embryos show body torsion, with left-handed and right-handed torsion defects being detected at approximately the same frequencies (∼40% each; Fig. 4E,F). These data also supported our hypothesis that PNS cells participate in generating the proper pattern of alternating type 1–type 2 contractions, which is essential for the maintenance of body posture.
In further experiments, we analyzed tw–sens double mutants and revealed that tw is epistatic to sens, as all double-mutant embryos were found to have left-handed torsion (Fig. 4E). Since da cells represent the only type of peripheral sensory neurons present in sens mutants (Nolo et al., 2000; Suster and Bate, 2002), this result suggests that the downregulation of POMTs in da neurons is sufficient to generate an abnormal feedback from these cells to the CNS and affect muscle contractions in tw–sens double mutants. However, these cells do not suffice to maintain proper contractions in sens mutants, presumably because normal contractions also require sensory feedback from other PNS cells that these mutants are missing (Suster and Bate, 2002; Hughes and Thomas, 2007). Together, these results suggest that PNS neurons, including class IV da neurons, while normally supporting the proper pattern of contraction waves, generate an aberrant feedback to the CNS in POMT mutants. This abnormal feedback affects the pattern of muscle contractions and thus underlies the pathogenic mechanism of the torsion phenotype.
POMTs are required for patterning of axonal projections of sensory neurons
To elucidate possible cellular mechanisms underlying the requirement of POMTs for PNS function, we examined POMT mutants for possible defects of PNS functional morphology. Since our rescue and genetic interaction experiments suggested that the function of POMTs could be required in class IV da sensory neurons, we focused on the analysis of these cells in POMT mutants. Class IV da cells develop a characteristic laminar pattern of axonal projections in the ventral ganglion (Grueber et al., 2007). We labeled these projections using a Ppk-tdTom reporter or a Ppk-Gal4-driven UAS-tdGFP marker (Han et al., 2012) and analyzed their morphology once embryos hatched from the shell (the first instar stage). We found that the axonal projections show significant abnormalities in tw and rt mutants, including thickened commissural branches and, in the case of rt mutants, missing or severely depleted longitudinal tracts (Fig. 5A–E). The axon phenotype of tw mutants was milder on average, which is consistent with the fact that the tw1 mutant used in these experiments is a hypomorph (Lyalin et al., 2006). Transgenic expression of tw or rt induced specifically in class IV da cells could rescue defects of axonal projections in tw or rt mutants, respectively (Fig. 5B–E), which confirmed the specificity of the phenotypes and also suggested that POMTs function cell autonomously to pattern axonal projections of sensory neurons. Furthermore, the rescue of axonal projections correlated with the rescue of muscle contractions in tw mutants, supporting the hypothesis that the miswiring of sensory axons causes the defect of muscle contractions in POMT mutants (Fig. 5F).
To characterize the nervous system phenotype in more detail, we used markers for glial cells and major axonal tracts in the ventral ganglion. Immunostaining with Repo antibody that specifically labels the majority of glial cells (Dickson and Zou, 2010; Neuhaus-Follini and Bashaw, 2015) revealed no significant difference between wild-type and rt mutants (Fig. 6A,B), which suggests that glia development is not affected in POMT mutants. This result, however, cannot rule out the possibility of some functional defects of glial cells, in particular, possible abnormalities in midline glia that plays role in axon guidance (Jacobs, 2000; Crews, 2010). To check for possible abnormalities in axon guidance, we examined immunostaining for FasII that labels all major long axon tracts in the ventral ganglion (Landgraf et al., 2003; Wu et al., 2011). These tracts are affected by mutations in genes involved in major axon guidance pathways (e.g., defects in the Slit/Robo pathway cause abnormal midline crossing; Jacobs, 2000), Plexin and Semaphorin mutants show disorganized morphology of selected tracts (Ayoob et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2011), while mutations in Netrins and frazzled affect tract continuity (Organisti et al., 2015). We found no obvious abnormalities of long axon tracts in rt mutants (Fig. 6C–F). The FasII-positive tracts also provided a useful reference for examining the dorsoventral position of sensory projections in the ventral ganglion (Grueber et al., 2007). Analysis of optical sections stained for FasII revealed that class IV sensory axons project properly to the ventral region of the ganglion in rt mutants (Fig. 6G,H). Together, these results suggest that axon guidance is not generally affected by POMT mutations.
We further investigated in greater detail the phenotype of sensory projections by labeling individual class IV axons using the Flp-out technique (Basler and Struhl, 1994; Wong et al., 2002; Grueber et al., 2007). These experiments revealed that the morphology of sensory axon termini in rt mutants is different from that in wild-type controls. In agreement with a previous report (Grueber et al., 2007), we found that individual axon termini in wild-type ventral nerve cords fall into the following two distinct categories: the axons that branch along longitudinal tracts of the laminar pattern without crossing the midline (“branching only”); and the axons that both branch longitudinally and cross the midline (“branching and crossing”). In rt mutants, in addition to these two types of axons, we observed a substantial proportion of axons that cross the midline without branching (“crossing only”; Fig. 6I,J). This type of axon was not present in wild-type ventral nerve cords. The crossing-only axons appear to develop at the expense of branching and crossing axons, as the proportion of branching-only axons was about the same in mutants and controls (20% and 19% in rt mutants and wild-type, respectively; Fig. 6J). These data are consistent with the phenotype of the laminar pattern of sensory axon projections in POMT mutants that shows thickening of commissural tracts and depletion of longitudinal connections (Fig. 5A,B). However, other possible abnormalities of axon termini, such as defects in fasciculation or branch distribution, may also contribute to the phenotype of the laminar pattern, but they could not be revealed in our Flp-out experiments. Further studies using multiple markers will be required for more detailed analysis of individual sensory axon termini in POMT mutants. Nevertheless, together, our results strongly support the hypothesis that POMTs are specifically required for proper patterning of class IV sensory axon termini, but protein O-mannosylation is not involved in general axon guidance or overall development of the nervous system.
Dystroglycan mutants do not have the torsion phenotype
Dg is the best characterized target of protein O-mannosylation. POMT-mediated glycosylation of Dg is important for its functional interactions with ECM ligands (Barresi and Campbell, 2006; Yoshida-Moriguchi and Campbell, 2015). While O-mannosylation was found on many other mammalian glycoproteins (Vester-Christensen et al., 2013; Panin and Wells, 2014), Dg is so far the only known O-mannosylated protein in Drosophila (Nakamura et al., 2010a,b). To test whether the torsion phenotype of POMT mutants is caused by a defect in Dg activity, we analyzed first instar Dg mutant larvae. While nearly all first instar POMT mutant larvae showed conspicuous body torsion (Fig. 1B), no torsion phenotype was detected in Dg mutants (Fig. 7). These results suggest that the torsion phenotype of POMT mutants is not caused by the loss of Dg activity and that some other yet unknown functional substrates of POMTs play a role in the pathogenic mechanisms underlying this phenotype.
Discussion
Here we described a novel embryonic phenotype in POMT mutants and investigated its mechanism using genetic tools and live-imaging approaches. We focused on a newly discovered role of POMTs in generating patterns of muscle contractions. Our detailed analyses of muscle contractions led us to the main conclusion that the torsion phenotype arises due to abnormal coordination of contraction waves. We found that during late embryogenesis embryo body posture is controlled dynamically by contraction waves. During this time, left-handed torsion gradually accumulates in POMT mutants. The proper pattern of contraction waves presumably requires a PNS-mediated feedback that relays information on body posture to the CNS. The pattern of waves depends on POMT activity in the nervous system, including class IV sensory da neurons. In POMT mutants, sensory neurons apparently generate an aberrant signal to the CNS, which results in an abnormal pattern of contraction waves and the torsion phenotype (Fig. 8).
Several lines of evidence provided support for this mechanism. First, our data suggest that the torsion phenotype is not caused by gross defects of muscle morphology (Fig. 1A). Although we cannot completely exclude the possibility that muscles may have some fine morphological defects or/and abnormal physiology, our analyses suggested that embryonic muscles, rather than being misaligned during development, are formed properly in POMT mutants. The torsion phenotype arises only during peristaltic contractions and is essentially fully penetrant (Figs. 1, 4). Occasional muscle defects were reported in POMT mutants, but these defects are present at low frequency and are not bilaterally biased (Martín-Blanco and García-Bellido, 1996; Haines et al., 2007; Ueyama et al., 2010), and thus it was previously concluded that they are unlikely to cause the misalignment of body segments (Martín-Blanco and García-Bellido, 1996). This is consistent with our results, which furthermore indicated that the torsion phenotype is developmentally transient, as the phenotype becomes undetectable at later larval stages (Fig. 1B). This presumably happens because the torsion becomes fixed as the cuticle hardens during late embryogenesis, but the phenotype disappears once the cuticle is shed upon transition to the second instar. Second, the torsion arises due to alteration in the pattern of contraction waves, while the effects of individual waves on posture are not altered in POMT mutants (Figs. 2B–D, 3C–G). These data suggest that individual muscles contract normally and that the torsion is caused primarily by a neurological abnormality affecting wave patterning. Third, our analyses of sens mutants highlighted the role of PNS cells in producing the torsion phenotype. A defect in the specification of PNS neurons alone could cause muscle contraction and posture phenotypes similar to those in POMT mutants (Fig. 4D–F). Epistatic interaction between tw and sens suggested that da sensory neurons are sufficient to propagate the abnormal sensory feedback in POMT mutants (Fig. 4F). Furthermore, POMT mutations specifically affect patterning of axon termini, while axon guidance and the ventral ganglion development are not generally affected (Figs. 5, 6), suggesting that aberrant connectivity between sensory and CNS neurons underlies the defect of sensory feedback. Finally, genetic rescue revealed that POMT activity restored in class IV da sensory neurons in POMT mutants was sufficient to rescue the torsion phenotype and both the abnormality of contractions and the defect in axonal projections (Fig. 5B–F), suggesting that these neurons play an important role in POMT-mediated control of contractions and body posture. This role is consistent with the proposed function of these polymodal neurons in proprioception and mechanosensation and their involvement in the regulation of larval locomotion (Adams et al., 1998; Ainsley et al., 2003; Zhong et al., 2010; Gorczyca et al., 2014).
We found that Dg mutants do not have body torsion, suggesting that the torsion phenotype of POMT mutants is not caused by the loss of Dg activity and other POMT target(s) could affect sensory axon patterning. Two main orthogonal systems that position sensory axons along dorsoventral and mediolateral axes rely on Semaphorin/Plexin and Slit/Robo signaling, respectively, while connectivity across the midline also depends on the Netrin/Frazzled pathway (Zlatic et al., 2003, 2009; Grueber et al., 2007; Morikawa et al., 2011). POMT mutants have sensory axons properly positioned along the dorsoventral axis, suggesting that POMTs may affect primarily mediolateral and/or midline-crossing cues. However, axon guidance is not generally abnormal in POMT mutants, and defects are probably limited to the patterning of axon termini. Proper patterning of axon termini is important for correct circuit assembly; however, this mechanism remains poorly understood and probably involves the cooperation of canonical cues with additional modulators (Kolodkin and Tessier-Lavigne, 2011), such as cadherins, RPTPs, and other adhesion and signaling molecules (Morikawa et al., 2011; Dascenco et al., 2015; Organisti et al., 2015). Whether some of these proteins can be relevant POMT targets remains to be elucidated.
Our experiments discovered an intrinsic chirality of embryo rolling behavior during peristaltic waves of muscle contractions. Although the mechanism underlying this behavior remains unknown, considering that Drosophila body wall muscles show no obvious asymmetry in development, a putative handedness of embryo–eggshell interactions may provide an explanation of this phenomenon. Irrespective of the exact source of the chirality, here we propose a model that explains the relationship between rolling and torsion based on the assumption that rolling forces correlate with the strength of contractions. We propose that chiral rolling forces are induced by the propagation of a contraction wave, perhaps through interactions between cuticle and the vitelline membrane, and result in left-handed embryo rolling with respect to wave propagation. This model is supported by the observation that both backward and forward type 1 waves result in counterclockwise embryo rolling, when viewed in the direction of wave propagation. Our model predicts that these waves induce stronger rolling in the beginning and weaker rolling in the end of propagation since they show on average greater amplitude in the beginning and decreasing amplitude toward the end of the wave (Fig. 3C,D). This should generate a differential distribution of a torque force along the embryo, and, therefore, embryo torsion. Importantly, while waves in the opposite direction generate rolling in different directions, this torque force is predicted to induce right-handed (dextral) body torsion, regardless of wave direction (Fig. 8A), which is supported by our data (Fig. 3E,F). Our model is also consistent with the fact that biphasic (type 2) waves generate a left-handed (sinistral) torsion. According to our observations, type 2 waves induce differential rolling mostly at the anterior part, during the end of the wave, presumably because this part experiences stronger contractions (and thus greater rolling) in the second phase of the wave, compared with relatively weaker contractions (and therefore less rolling) in the initial phase that induces rolling in the opposite direction (Fig. 8). Rolling is essentially halted at the posterior end, where the backward and forward waves overlap and cancel the effect of each other, inducing prolonged static contractions (Fig. 3A,B,D; Movie 7). As a result, only the anterior part of the embryo experiences a significant net roll, producing a cumulative left-handed torsion, which is in agreement with observations (Fig. 3F).
Interestingly, POMT mutations affect body posture by changing the pattern of waves, while rolling and torque associated with individual waves remain unaffected. Therefore, POMT mutations do not break the symmetry of processes that control posture. Instead, they uncover the intrinsic chirality underlying these processes by impairing the nervous system-mediated mechanism that compensates for this chirality and maintains the alignment of body segments. The dynamic correction for chiral torsion that we described here provides, to our knowledge, the first example of a “chirality-neutralizing” mechanism that maintains the symmetry of a developing system affected by asymmetric forces.
Here we identified a new asymmetric marker in Drosophila development, an embryo rolling behavior. How is this chirality related to other known markers of LR asymmetry? While LR asymmetry affects numerous aspects of the development and physiology of more complex animals, LR asymmetry in Drosophila is relatively simple. It appears to be limited to the morphogenesis of some tubular structures, including male terminalia rotation and looping of the gut and testis (Géminard et al., 2014). These LR asymmetries are thought to depend on cellular interactions and common molecular regulators such as Myosin ID (Géminard et al., 2014). It is tempting to speculate that the rolling asymmetry may be “hardwired” in intrinsic molecular chirality of some structural features of cuticle, eggshell, or muscles, and thus the rolling asymmetry and other LR markers may have distinct mechanisms. Further studies are required to reveal the relationship between embryo asymmetric rolling and other LR markers.
The striking similarity of embryo torsion and adult abdomen rotation phenotypes of POMT mutants suggests that they result from analogous pathogenic mechanisms. However, body torsion disappears upon transition from the first to second instar, indicating that the abdomen rotation phenotype is induced de novo during metamorphosis. Intriguingly, coordinated waves of abdominal muscle contractions that facilitate prepupa–pupa transition occur during metamorphosis (Robertson, 1936; Chadfield and Sparrow, 1985; Fortier et al., 2003). Putative abnormalities of these contractions may cause misalignment of abdominal segments, resulting in the abdomen rotation phenotype. Further experiments will be needed to test this hypothesis.
Remarkable conservation of POMTs in animals suggests an intriguing possibility that their role in facilitating neural connectivity to control muscle contractions may be conserved in vertebrates. Interestingly, the downregulation of POMK, a kinase involved in biosynthesis of vertebrate O-mannosyl glycans, causes abnormality in coordinated muscle contractions in zebrafish embryos, while clinical features of syndromes associated with POM defects commonly include abnormal muscle contractions (Leyten et al., 1996; Di Costanzo et al., 2014). Further studies should shed light on evolutionary conservation of the role of POMTs in regulating muscle contractions and axonal connectivity, which can potentially elucidate pathogenic mechanisms of diseases caused by POM abnormalities.
Footnotes
The project was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants NS-099409, NS075534, and CONACYT 2012-037(S) to V.M.P. Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center at Indiana University (NIH Grant P40-OD-018537) were used in this study. We thank Graeme Davis, Eric Olson, and Cynthia Hughes for providing transgenic Drosophila strains. We also thank Aaron Henrichsen (Penn State University) for his help with statistical analyses. In addition, we thank Paul Hardin, Bruce Riley, and Ginger Carney for valuable discussions and comments on the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Vladislav M. Panin, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, TAMU 2128, College Station, TX 77843-2128. panin{at}tamu.edu