Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Stephani Sutherland [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 25 September 2019, 39 (39) 7641; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.39.39.2019
Stephani Sutherland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephani Sutherland
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Influences of Dopamine, Norepinephrine on Episodic Memory

Tobias U. Hauser, Eran Eldar, Nina Purg, Michael Moutoussis, and Raymond J. Dolan

(see pages 7715–7721)

Episodic memories are the conscious recollections of our lived experiences with all their contextual richness. These long-term memory traces do not exist for all our experiences, and it is unclear what determines which ones are stored and what events are lost to us. The neurotransmitters dopamine and norepinephrine play important neuromodulatory roles, marking salient or rewarding experiences, but exactly how they influence memory storage is not known. This week, Hauser et al. show in humans that an arousal-related memory boost depended on signaling by norepinephrine, whereas dopamine was required for a memory selectivity bias.

Subjects were tasked with rating the readability of common words presented in uncommon text fonts; they were not told to remember them. Twenty minutes later, subjects were shown previously presented words mixed with novel words and asked whether they had seen each word before. In addition, one-quarter of the words presented in the initial phase were randomly paired with a £0.50 reward, making them particularly arousing. Some nonrewarded words were presented for the second time in a different font than the first time, resulting in poorer recall performance as a result of memory selectivity bias.

Before testing, subjects received an oral dose of placebo, a β-adrenergic receptor antagonist to block noradrenergic signaling, or a D3/D4 dopamine receptor antagonist. Subjects receiving placebo or the β-adrenergic receptor antagonist had worse recall when words were presented in a different font, but this memory selectivity bias was not detected in people receiving the dopamine receptor antagonist, indicating a role for dopamine but not norepinephrine signaling. Subjects did not differ in their overall performance on the tasks.

The researchers also measured pupil size in subjects, which they used as a measure of arousal. All subjects had larger pupil dilation following rewarded compared with nonrewarded words. Subjects given placebo or dopamine receptor antagonist showed an arousal-mediated memory boost in that their recall was better for rewarded words, but those receiving the β-adrenergic receptor blocker did not, demonstrating that norepinephrine was required for this effect. No subjects performed above chance when asked to express which words were rewarded or unrewarded. These results delineate more specific roles for these important neuromodulators in making episodic memories.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Neuronal dynamic gain vs input frequency. After SD, neurons (yellow) are compromised in their ability to phase lock with high-frequency inputs. Synaptic blockers (blue) prevented the deficit.

Neurons Not So Fine after Spreading Depression, after All

Omer Revah, Ohad Stoler, Andreas Neef, Fred Wolf, Ilya A. Fleidervish, et al.

(see pages 7790–7800)

A hallmark of cortical ischemia and other hypoxic insults is cortical spreading depression (SD), in which glutamate causes massive depolarization of neurons and glia, leading to a complete breakdown of ionic gradients that prevents spiking. Remarkably, cortical neurons recover from SD within minutes and appear electrophysiologically unimpaired. Nevertheless, clinical data suggest that cortical function may be compromised after hypoxic events. New work from Revah, Stoler et al. now shows that the ability of cortical neurons to track and encode fast inputs was compromised hours after SD as a result of structural damage done by the calcium-dependent protease calpain.

Hypoxia was induced in slices from mouse somatosensory cortex by flowing an oxygen-free gas over the slices in two episodes separated by several minutes. Several hours after SD, whole-cell patch-clamp recordings showed that layer 5 neurons in control and hypoxia-recovered slices responded similarly to depolarization with trains of action potentials. The researchers next tested the dynamic gain of the neurons, or their ability to encode subthreshold inputs, by injecting electrical current patterns meant to represent such inputs against a background of synaptic noise. At lower frequencies, both control and recovered neurons were able to phase lock with spike trains, but phase locking in hypoxia-recovered neurons was compromised at frequencies >100 Hz. Bath application of a mixture of synaptic ionotropic receptor blockers prevented the development of SD during hypoxia; neurons from these slices encoded spike trains similarly to those of control neurons.

The researchers next investigated the cytoskeletal architecture at the axon initial segment by staining for ankyrin G (AnkG). In slices recovered from hypoxia, AnkG staining was markedly reduced, indicating structural damage, although sodium channel distribution appeared intact. In slices recovered from hypoxia that were bathed in a calpain inhibitor, neurons were protected from both structural damage and encoding deficits, suggesting that SD-induced damage depended on calcium and calpain—a protease that targets structural proteins and ion channels. Cortical neurons fire at relatively low frequencies (1–20 Hz), so their power to encode complex signals arises from the activity of the population. The findings of SD-induced damage in cortical neurons suggest that they may no longer be able to effectively encode information despite their normal outward appearance.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Stephani Sutherland, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 39 (39)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 39, Issue 39
25 Sep 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 25 September 2019, 39 (39) 7641; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.39.39.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 25 September 2019, 39 (39) 7641; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.39.39.2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Influences of Dopamine, Norepinephrine on Episodic Memory
    • Neurons Not So Fine after Spreading Depression, after All
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.