Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

A Multisensory Perspective on the Role of the Amygdala in Body Ownership

Arran T. Reader and Laura Crucianelli
Journal of Neuroscience 25 September 2019, 39 (39) 7645-7647; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0971-19.2019
Arran T. Reader
Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Arran T. Reader
Laura Crucianelli
Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Crucianelli
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

A sense of ownership over one's own body is essential for effective interaction with the world: acting upon objects or communicating with others relies on distinguishing between the parts of the world that constitute our self, and the parts of the world that do not. The sense of body ownership is frequently associated with activity in the ventral premotor cortex, intraparietal sulcus, and insula (Grivaz et al., 2017), and is believed to stem from multisensory integration (Ehrsson, 2012): congruent sensory signals are combined to provide a feeling of bodily self that is distinct from the surrounding environment. This is emphasized by the rubber hand illusion (RHI), in which synchronous, but not asynchronous, stroking of a rubber hand and the real hand (which is hidden from view) can induce a sense of ownership over the false limb (Botvinick and Cohen, 1998).

In an article in The Journal of Neuroscience, Spengler et al. (2019) proposed a role for the amygdala in mediating the sense of body ownership. In line with the oft-reported role of this area in threat-related processing, they hypothesized that the amygdala may be involved in protecting against distorted body perception and that susceptibility to body illusions, such as the RHI, might therefore be determined in part by amygdala activity. To test this hypothesis, they performed three experiments. In the first, they recruited twin women with bilateral amygdala lesions (resulting from Urbach–Wiethe disease) and compared their subjective experience in the RHI (agreement with statements about the illusory experience and illusion onset time) with that of 13 healthy controls. In the second experiment, they examined whether illusion onset correlated with amygdala volume in healthy participants. In a third study, they assessed responses to the RHI after the administration of intranasal oxytocin, which has been found to have an inhibitory effect on the amygdala (e.g., Martins et al., 2019).

The response of the patients to the RHI was striking. Both immediately reported the strongest possible feeling of ownership over the rubber hand. Their onset time for the illusion was 1 s, whereas the average onset for control participants was >2 min. In the second experiment, the authors found a positive correlation between amygdala volume and illusion onset: people with a larger amygdala took longer to experience the illusion. Finally, Spengler et al. (2019) found that the administration of intranasal oxytocin increased the strength of the illusion and reduced onset time compared with placebo, in keeping with other research on the RHI (Crucianelli et al., 2019). From these consistent results the authors concluded that amygdala activation and structural integrity influences susceptibility to the RHI, and that the amygdala helps protect the body from potentially damaging illusory perceptions.

The study by Spengler et al. (2019) provides insight into potential subcortical mechanisms underlying the experience of body ownership. We agree with the authors that the amygdala may help to maintain a coherent perception of the bodily self, but we do not necessarily agree with a threat-related role for the amygdala in body ownership. Instead, we believe that the results are adequately explained by deferring to the classic conceptualization of body ownership as deriving from multisensory integration.

As previous work has established, the RHI relies on the manipulation of multisensory signals (vision, touch, proprioception) that contribute to the sense of bodily self. In addition to these bottom-up sensory signals, a feeling of body ownership may be influenced by top-down processes, such as our expectations of reality (e.g., that a hand seen extending from the body in a first-person perspective is very likely to be one's own) (Apps and Tsakiris, 2014) or internal models of our own body appearance (Tsakiris, 2010). We propose that the amygdala may help mediate between these bottom-up and top-down processes to support the conscious sense of bodily self.

The amygdala has an established role in multisensory integration (Ghazanfar and Schroeder, 2006; Van der Stoep et al., 2019), a process that is essential to ascertain whether different sensory inputs share a common source (e.g., a touch seen on a rubber hand and a touch felt on the real hand). Multisensory integration occurs in the amygdala even in contexts devoid of affective content (Morrow et al., 2019), and this integration is supported by reciprocal projections to primary sensory cortical areas (Janak and Tye, 2015), by a large proportion of neurons responsive to two or more sensory inputs (Morrow et al., 2019), and by intrinsic connectivity between different unimodal subregions (Benarroch, 2015). Importantly, the amygdala is sensitive to novel multisensory input (Ghazanfar and Schroeder, 2006), which means it must also have access to information about previously experienced or expected sensory input. Notably, the amygdala is functionally connected to the posterior parietal cortex, where the established perception of the body, built up with experience, is putatively stored (Longo et al., 2010). It is also functionally connected to the insula (Roy et al., 2009), which is involved in bodily awareness (Grivaz et al., 2017), and it projects onto the ventral premotor cortex (Ishida et al., 2018; Rizzo et al., 2018), a region that has been associated with the experience of ownership over the false hand during the RHI (Guterstam et al., 2019). Together, the functional and anatomical connectivity of the amygdala suggests that it is well situated for supporting these cortical areas that are commonly associated with the sense of body ownership. This may involve comparing established knowledge about the own body with ongoing sensory feedback about the body. If online sensory feedback conflicts with the stored representation of the body, as at the start of the RHI, it is plausible that one maintains a feeling of ownership over their real (hidden) hand since this is the source of established bodily experience. However, as the synchronous seen and felt touches continue, it becomes evident that they must share a common source: one's own body (Apps and Tsakiris, 2014). If this occurs, then the feeling that the false limb is one's own can arise. According to this view, the amygdala may be part of a system that “gates” conscious bodily self-perception, limiting the influence of online sensory information about the body until it is strong enough to override experience.

Behavioral support for this hypothesis is found in the incredible speed with which the amygdala-lesioned patients reported the RHI (Spengler et al., 2019). This might occur if their conscious perception immediately resolves to the most likely conclusion given everyday experience (that a hand viewed from the first-person perspective is one's own), or if their internal body model is immediately disregarded in favor of the false hand. This is a plausible outcome if damage to the amygdala interferes with the ability to balance top-down information and bottom-up sensory signals. Indeed, damage to the amygdala or amygdala connectivity can also result in disorders of bodily self-awareness (e.g., Jenkinson et al., 2013; Pacella et al., 2019). In healthy participants, increased amygdala activation was observed when incongruent multisensory information was presented during a RHI paradigm (Tsakiris et al., 2007), further suggesting that the amygdala is sensitive to discrepancies between incoming sensory feedback and established sensory expectations regarding what constitutes the real body. Effects on the conscious experience of body ownership in healthy individuals can also be observed when amygdala activity is reduced with intranasal oxytocin, or when comparing RHI onset with amygdala volume, as reported by Spengler et al. (2019). The greater the activity (or size) of the amygdala, the longer it takes to resolve conflict between top-down information and congruent multisensory information arising from the real and false hands because inconsistency between different sources of online sensory information can be more readily detected (e.g., the asynchronicity of seen and felt touches). This delays the establishment of a coherent percept of an owned limb.

Another possible interpretation of the results is that the amygdala is simply involved in multisensory integration during the RHI, rather than mediating between multisensory information and top-down processes. Indeed, the speed of illusion onset in the Urbach–Wiethe patients reported by Spengler et al. (2019) could reflect an overriding influence of visual feedback on hand ownership (e.g., Martinaud et al., 2017) in the absence of multisensory integration that normally occurs in the amygdala. Similarly, downregulation of the amygdala in healthy participants could speed the onset of the RHI by limiting the sensitivity of the amygdala to online multisensory conflict, placing greater weight on the more salient visual information rather than the conflicting proprioceptive feedback. If this is the case, we might expect that decreased amygdala activity would result in the experience of ownership over the rubber hand, even if it was stroked asynchronously with the real one. Unfortunately, Spengler et al. (2019) did not perform this classic control test for the RHI. However, other research suggests that intranasal oxytocin increases the strength of the RHI only when synchronous stroking is applied to the real and fake hands, not with asynchronous stroking or purely visual feedback (Crucianelli et al., 2019). As such, this interpretation seems less tenable.

In conclusion, we propose that the findings reported by Spengler et al. (2019) may reflect a role for the amygdala in mediating top-down and bottom-up information for the purpose of maintaining a sense of body ownership. As emphasized by Spengler et al. (2019), the amygdala is infrequently reported in neuroimaging studies of body ownership, which may be due to its small size. However, it is possible that cortical areas associated with body ownership are supported by subcortical areas, such as the amygdala, and we hope that further research will investigate the alternative hypotheses of amygdala function discussed here.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneurosci-journal-club.

  • We thank Professor Henrik Ehrsson and Catriona Scrivener for helpful comments on a draft of this work.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Arran T. Reader at arran.reader{at}ki.se

References

  1. ↵
    1. Apps MA,
    2. Tsakiris M
    (2014) The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 41:85–97. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.029 pmid:23416066
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Benarroch EE
    (2015) The amygdala: functional organization and involvement in neurologic disorders. Neurology 84:313–324. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001171 pmid:25527268
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Botvinick M,
    2. Cohen J
    (1998) Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756. doi:10.1038/35784 pmid:9486643
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Crucianelli L,
    2. Paloyelis Y,
    3. Ricciardi L,
    4. Jenkinson PM,
    5. Fotopoulou A
    (2019) Embodied precision: intranasal oxytocin modulates multisensory integration. J Cogn Neurosci 31:592–606. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01366 pmid:30562138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Ehrsson HH
    (2012) The concept of body ownership and its relation to multisensory integration. In: The new handbook of multisensory processes (Stein BE, ed), pp 775–792. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  6. ↵
    1. Ghazanfar AA,
    2. Schroeder CE
    (2006) Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends Cogn Sci 10:278–285. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008 pmid:16713325
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Grivaz P,
    2. Blanke O,
    3. Serino A
    (2017) Common and distinct brain regions processing multisensory bodily signals for peripersonal space and body ownership. Neuroimage 147:602–618. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.052 pmid:28017920
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Guterstam A,
    2. Collins KL,
    3. Cronin JA,
    4. Zeberg H,
    5. Darvas F,
    6. Weaver KE,
    7. Ojemann JG,
    8. Ehrsson HH
    (2019) Direct electrophysiological correlates of body ownership in human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 29:1328–1341. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy285 pmid:30496342
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ishida H,
    2. Inoue KI,
    3. Takada M
    (2018) Multisynaptic projections from the amygdala to the ventral premotor cortex in macaque monkeys: anatomical substrate for feeding behavior. Front Neuroanat 12:3. doi:10.3389/fnana.2018.00003 pmid:29403364
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Janak PH,
    2. Tye KM
    (2015) From circuits to behaviour in the amygdala. Nature 517:284–292. doi:10.1038/nature14188 pmid:25592533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Jenkinson PM,
    2. Haggard P,
    3. Ferreira NC,
    4. Fotopoulou A
    (2013) Body ownership and attention in the mirror: insights from somatoparaphrenia and the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia 51:1453–1462. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.029 pmid:23603022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Longo MR,
    2. Azañón E,
    3. Haggard P
    (2010) More than skin deep: body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia 48:655–668. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.022 pmid:19720070
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Martinaud O,
    2. Besharati S,
    3. Jenkinson PM,
    4. Fotopoulou A
    (2017) Ownership illusions in patients with body delusions: different neural profiles of visual capture and disownership. Cortex 87:174–185. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.09.025 pmid:27839786
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Martins D,
    2. Mazibuko N,
    3. Zelaya F,
    4. Vasilakopoulou S,
    5. Loveridge J,
    6. Oates A,
    7. Maltezos S,
    8. Mehta M,
    9. Howard M,
    10. McAlonan G,
    11. Murphy D,
    12. Williams S,
    13. Fotopoulou A,
    14. Schuschnig U,
    15. Paloyelis Y
    (2019) Do direct nose-to-brain pathways underlie intranasal oxytocin-induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow in humans? bioRxiv. Advance online publication. Retrieved February 28, 2019. doi:10.1101/563056.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Morrow J,
    2. Mosher C,
    3. Gothard K
    (2019) Multisensory neurons in the primate amygdala. J Neurosci 39:3663–3675. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2903-18.2019 pmid:30858163
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Pacella V,
    2. Foulon C,
    3. Jenkinson PM,
    4. Scandola M,
    5. Bertagnoli S,
    6. Avesani R,
    7. Fotopoulou A,
    8. Moro V,
    9. Thiebaut de Schotten M
    (2019) Anosognosia for hemiplegia as a tripartite disconnection syndrome. Elife 8:e46075. doi:10.7554/eLife.46075 pmid:31383259
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Rizzo G,
    2. Milardi D,
    3. Bertino S,
    4. Basile GA,
    5. Di Mauro D,
    6. Calamuneri A,
    7. Chillemi G,
    8. Silvestri G,
    9. Anastasi G,
    10. Bramanti A,
    11. Cacciola A
    (2018) The limbic and sensorimotor pathways of the human amygdala: a structural connectivity study. Neuroscience 385:166–180. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.05.051 pmid:29890294
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Roy AK,
    2. Shehzad Z,
    3. Margulies DS,
    4. Kelly AM,
    5. Uddin LQ,
    6. Gotimer K,
    7. Biswal BB,
    8. Castellanos FX,
    9. Milham MP
    (2009) Functional connectivity of the human amygdala using resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 45:614–626. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.030 pmid:19110061
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Spengler FB,
    2. Scheele D,
    3. Kaiser S,
    4. Heinrichs M,
    5. Hurlemann R
    (2019) A protective mechanism against illusory perceptions is amygdala-dependent. J Neurosci 39:3301–3308. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2577-18.2019 pmid:30804094
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Tsakiris M
    (2010) My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 48:703–712. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034 pmid:19819247
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Tsakiris M,
    2. Hesse MD,
    3. Boy C,
    4. Haggard P,
    5. Fink GR
    (2007) Neural signatures of body ownership: a sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cereb Cortex 17:2235–2244. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl131 pmid:17138596
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Van der Stoep N,
    2. Van der Stigchel S,
    3. Van Engelen RC,
    4. Biesbroek JM,
    5. Nijboer TC
    (2019) Impairments in multisensory integration after stroke. J Cogn Neurosci 31:885–899. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01389 pmid:30883294
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 39 (39)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 39, Issue 39
25 Sep 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Multisensory Perspective on the Role of the Amygdala in Body Ownership
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Multisensory Perspective on the Role of the Amygdala in Body Ownership
Arran T. Reader, Laura Crucianelli
Journal of Neuroscience 25 September 2019, 39 (39) 7645-7647; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0971-19.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
A Multisensory Perspective on the Role of the Amygdala in Body Ownership
Arran T. Reader, Laura Crucianelli
Journal of Neuroscience 25 September 2019, 39 (39) 7645-7647; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0971-19.2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mixed Excitatory and Inhibitory Projections from the Basolateral Amygdala to the Mediodorsal Thalamic Nucleus
  • Selective and Systems-Level Face Processing Impairments in ASD
  • Transplanted Astrocytes Show Functional Flexibility in the Recipient Brain
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.