Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Insights on the Role of Thalamocortical HCN Channels in Absence Epilepsy

Gábor Kozák
Journal of Neuroscience 23 January 2019, 39 (4) 578-580; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2063-18.2018
Gábor Kozák
MTA-SZTE Lendület Oscillatory Neuronal Networks Research Group, Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Szeged H-6720, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gábor Kozák
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Absence epilepsy is the most common type of epilepsy in childhood (Glauser et al., 2010). It is characterized by sudden, transient loss of consciousness, behavioral arrest, and an EEG pattern dominated by spike-and-wave discharges (Crunelli and Leresche, 2002). Through studies performed on brain slices and anesthetized animals (Steriade et al., 1993; McCormick and Contreras, 2001; Timofeev and Steriade, 2004), as well as recent investigations of local circuits in awake animals (Makinson et al., 2017; Sorokin et al., 2017; McCafferty et al., 2018), many aspects of the basic mechanisms of absence epilepsy have been elucidated. This type of seizure emerges as a result of promptly generalizing, highly synchronous interaction among neurons within the thalamocortical loop. In these loops, cortical pyramidal cells excite thalamocortical (TC) cells of the relay nuclei and the nucleus reticularis thalami (NRT); this excitation drives NRT cells to periodically impose bursts of inhibition on TC cells, which in turn send synchronous excitatory feedback to cortex and NRT (Steriade et al., 1993; McCormick and Contreras, 2001). Selective optogenetic intervention at any point of the thalamocortical loop can reduce seizure activity (Berényi et al., 2012; Paz et al., 2013; Sorokin et al., 2017) and hyperexcitation at any point can result in absence-like seizures (Meeren et al., 2002; Makinson et al., 2017; Sorokin et al., 2017). Therefore, the relative contribution of the different structures to seizure activity still remains elusive (Blumenfeld, 2005).

Deficiencies in several ion channels and receptors have been identified as possible causes or contributors to absence epilepsy both in humans and in animal models (van Luijtelaar et al., 2000; Crunelli and Leresche, 2002; Blumenfeld, 2005; Reid et al., 2012), but contradictory results have complicated efforts to understand seizure activity. Some contradictions might be rooted in the fact that particular ion channels have different roles in seizure dynamics depending on which cells one examines. For example, Makinson et al. (2017) showed that the loss of a particular type of voltage-gated sodium channel, Scn8a, promotes seizures when deleted in reticular nucleus of the thalamus, but its deletion from cortical neurons inhibits seizures. Contradictions might also arise when comparing studies conducted in awake and anesthetized animal, because thalamic and cortical activity, as well as the susceptibility to seizures are highly brain-state-dependent (Steriade et al., 1993; McCormick and Bal, 1997). Together, these results show the necessity of cautious approaches, such as investigating particular ion channels in a spatially and temporally constrained manner in absence epilepsy.

David et al. (2018) addressed some of these challenges in a recent study. They investigated hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, which, under normal circumstances, regulate neuronal excitability and shape network-level activity mostly by attenuating the effect of synaptic inputs on membrane potential. Importantly, in thalamus the current produced by HCN channels also contributes to burst firing (McCormick and Bal, 1997). Although HCN channels have been linked to epilepsy (Reid et al., 2012), their exact contribution remains to be elucidated. In epileptic mice HCN expression was decreased (Kase et al., 2012) and genetic deletion of HCN in mice caused absence epilepsy with increased thalamic burst activity (Ludwig et al., 2003), but in a genetic rat model of epilepsy, HCN channels were upregulated in the thalamus and that was accompanied with reduced burst firing (Cain et al., 2015).

To clarify the role of HCN channels in absence seizures, David et al. (2018) selectively blocked these channels in the ventrobasal (VB) nucleus of the thalamus in freely moving rodents, using one of two methods in three models of absence epilepsy. Specifically, they blocked HCN pharmacologically both in rats in which seizures were induced with gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and in genetically absence epileptic rats from Strasbourg (GAERS), and they knocked down HCN in stargazer mice.

Blocking HCN channels in GAERS reduced tonic firing and the total firing rate of thalamocortical cells both during and between seizures. The decrease in spiking likely resulted from hyperpolarization of the resting membrane potential, because patch-clamp recordings of thalamocortical cells in brain slices taken after HCN channels were knocked down in mice confirmed previous work showing that these channels primarily contribute to setting the resting membrane potential, without affecting action potential threshold and amplitude. Although most of the TC cells are already hyperpolarized (Steriade and Contreras, 1995) and fire sparsely during ictal events (McCafferty et al., 2018), blocking HCN might eliminate the remaining firing and thus radically decrease the output of VB during seizures. Importantly, however, David et al. (2018) found no alteration of burst firing after HCN function was reduced. Considering the non-uniform expression of HCN channels along the dendrites of the TC cells, a possible explanation is that HCN blockade might differentially influence membrane resistance at different input sites, which might compensate for the expected burst activity induced by the hyperpolarization and might result in no net change of burst firing. As tonic firing accounts for most of the firing of TC cells during seizures (McCafferty et al., 2018), the decrease of solely the tonic components may already cause an anti-seizure effect.

In all models, blocking HCN channels decreased total time spent in seizure. However, the different seizure models showed different response dynamics. In GAERS, the anti-seizure effect was reached through a decrease of seizure incidence, but once a seizure was established, its length was close to the control duration. The reduction in seizure occurrence rate is somewhat surprising, given that according to the cortical focus theory (Meeren et al., 2002) a hyperexcitable initiating zone located in the cortex (which is reciprocally connected to the VB) drives the thalamocortical loop into seizure activity in polygenic rodent epilepsy models like GAERS. One possible explanation of the reduced frequency of seizures after HCN inhibition in these animals is that after seizure-inducing activity emerges in the cortex, it requires prompt thalamic feedback to become a full-blown seizure with self-sustaining oscillations. When TC cells are hyperpolarized by HCN inhibition, this strictly timed feedback may be disrupted because too few TC cells are activated. Nonetheless, the relatively small effect on seizure duration suggests that even a radically decreased thalamocortical contribution can provide sufficient feedback to maintain ongoing seizure activity in this model. This suggests that thalamocortical cells may not be the best target for therapeutical approaches.

In both the GHB model and stargazer mice, the seizure occurrence rate did not decrease significantly, unlike in GAERS, probably because of different underlying mechanisms of seizure generation. Indeed, the seizure initiation of GHB application and of stargazer mice is not confined to a single onset region, according to current understanding (Letts, 2005; Venzi et al., 2015). In fact, the results from these models suggest that initiation of seizures might require little contribution from thalamocortical cells of the VB nucleus in these models, as seizure generation was intact despite the significantly decreased firing of TC cells by HCN blockade. Importantly, VB serves as an important hub for ongoing ictal activity in these models, because selective manipulation of the VB shortened seizures.

The work by David et al. (2018) is based on findings from three different animal models of absence epilepsy in two species with various backgrounds suggests that blocking HCN channels in the thalamus may limit seizure activity by substantially decreasing firing of thalamocortical cells. As in the case of spatially nonselective HCN channel silencing, inconsistent seizure-related effects were reported, therefore, further investigations of the corticothalamic dialogue at the network level and the relative contribution of cortical and thalamic HCN channels to seizure dynamics would be beneficial. Using a combination of tools to investigate subcellular- to network-level effects is essential in studying absence epilepsy. Beyond giving mechanistic insight into seizure generation, these approaches can help to identify possible nodes of the epileptic circuitry as potential pharmacological targets for new treatments.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/preparing-manuscript#journalclub.

  • This work was supported by the UNKP-18-3 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities (UNKP-18-3-III-SZTE-16). I thank Azahara Oliva and Antal Berényi for the insightful comments and discussion.

  • The author declares no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Gábor Kozák at kozgabi{at}gmail.com

References

  1. ↵
    1. Berényi A,
    2. Belluscio M,
    3. Mao D,
    4. Buzsáki G
    (2012) Closed-loop control of epilepsy by transcranial electrical stimulation. Science 337:735–737. doi:10.1126/science.1223154 pmid:22879515
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Blumenfeld H
    (2005) Cellular and network mechanisms of spike-wave seizures. Epilepsia 46:21–33. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00311.x pmid:16302873
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Cain SM,
    2. Tyson JR,
    3. Jones KL,
    4. Snutch TP
    (2015) Thalamocortical neurons display suppressed burst-firing due to an enhanced Ih current in a genetic model of absence epilepsy. Pflugers Arch 467:1367–1382. doi:10.1007/s00424-014-1549-4 pmid:24953239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Crunelli V,
    2. Leresche N
    (2002) Childhood absence epilepsy: genes, channels, neurons and networks. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:371–382. doi:10.1038/nrn811 pmid:11988776
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. David F,
    2. Çarçak N,
    3. Furdan S,
    4. Onat F,
    5. Gould T,
    6. Mészáros Á,
    7. Di Giovanni G,
    8. Hernández VM,
    9. Chan CS,
    10. Lőrincz ML,
    11. Crunelli V
    (2018) Suppression of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel function in thalamocortical neurons prevents genetically determined and pharmacologically induced absence seizures. J Neurosci 38:6615–6627. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0896-17.2018 pmid:29925625
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Glauser TA,
    2. Cnaan A,
    3. Shinnar S,
    4. Hirtz DG,
    5. Dlugos D,
    6. Masur D,
    7. Clark PO,
    8. Capparelli EV,
    9. Adamson PC
    ; Childhood Absence Epilepsy Study G (2010) Ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in childhood absence epilepsy. N Engl J Med 362:790–799. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0902014 pmid:20200383
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kase D,
    2. Inoue T,
    3. Imoto K
    (2012) Roles of the subthalamic nucleus and subthalamic HCN channels in absence seizures. J Neurophysiol 107:393–406. doi:10.1152/jn.00937.2010 pmid:22013231
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Letts VA
    (2005) Stargazer: a mouse to seize! Epilepsy Curr 5:161–165. doi:10.1111/j.1535-7511.2005.00051.x pmid:16175212
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ludwig A,
    2. Budde T,
    3. Stieber J,
    4. Moosmang S,
    5. Wahl C,
    6. Holthoff K,
    7. Langebartels A,
    8. Wotjak C,
    9. Munsch T,
    10. Zong X,
    11. Feil S,
    12. Feil R,
    13. Lancel M,
    14. Chien KR,
    15. Konnerth A,
    16. Pape HC,
    17. Biel M,
    18. Hofmann F
    (2003) Absence epilepsy and sinus dysrhythmia in mice lacking the pacemaker channel HCN2. EMBO J 22:216–224. doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg032 pmid:12514127
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Makinson CD,
    2. Tanaka BS,
    3. Sorokin JM,
    4. Wong JC,
    5. Christian CA,
    6. Goldin AL,
    7. Escayg A,
    8. Huguenard JR
    (2017) Regulation of thalamic and cortical network synchrony by Scn8a. Neuron 93:1165–1179.e6. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.031 pmid:28238546
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. McCafferty C,
    2. David F,
    3. Venzi M,
    4. Lőrincz ML,
    5. Delicata F,
    6. Atherton Z,
    7. Recchia G,
    8. Orban G,
    9. Lambert RC,
    10. Di Giovanni G,
    11. Leresche N,
    12. Crunelli V
    (2018) Cortical drive and thalamic feed-forward inhibition control thalamic output synchrony during absence seizures. Nat Neurosci 21:744–756. doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0130-4 pmid:29662216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. McCormick DA,
    2. Bal T
    (1997) Sleep and arousal: thalamocortical mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:185–215. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.185 pmid:9056712
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. McCormick DA,
    2. Contreras D
    (2001) On the cellular and network bases of epileptic seizures. Annu Rev Physiol 63:815–846. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.815 pmid:11181977
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Meeren HK,
    2. Pijn JP,
    3. Van Luijtelaar EL,
    4. Coenen AM,
    5. Lopes da Silva FH
    (2002) Cortical focus drives widespread corticothalamic networks during spontaneous absence seizures in rats. J Neurosci 22:1480–1495. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-04-01480.2002 pmid:11850474
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Paz JT,
    2. Davidson TJ,
    3. Frechette ES,
    4. Delord B,
    5. Parada I,
    6. Peng K,
    7. Deisseroth K,
    8. Huguenard JR
    (2013) Closed-loop optogenetic control of thalamus as a tool for interrupting seizures after cortical injury. Nat Neurosci 16:64–70. doi:10.1038/nn.3269 pmid:23143518
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Reid CA,
    2. Phillips AM,
    3. Petrou S
    (2012) HCN channelopathies: pathophysiology in genetic epilepsy and therapeutic implications. Br J Pharmacol 165:49–56. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01507.x pmid:21615728
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Sorokin JM,
    2. Davidson TJ,
    3. Frechette E,
    4. Abramian AM,
    5. Deisseroth K,
    6. Huguenard JR,
    7. Paz JT
    (2017) Bidirectional control of generalized epilepsy networks via rapid real-time switching of firing mode. Neuron 93:194–210. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.026 pmid:27989462
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Steriade M,
    2. Contreras D
    (1995) Relations between cortical and thalamic cellular events during transition from sleep patterns to paroxysmal activity. J Neurosci 15:623–642. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-01-00623.1995 pmid:7823168
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Steriade M,
    2. McCormick DA,
    3. Sejnowski TJ
    (1993) Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science 262:679–685. doi:10.1126/science.8235588 pmid:8235588
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Timofeev I,
    2. Steriade M
    (2004) Neocortical seizures: initiation, development and cessation. Neuroscience 123:299–336. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.08.051 pmid:14698741
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. van Luijtelaar G,
    2. Wiaderna D,
    3. Elants C,
    4. Scheenen W
    (2000) Opposite effects of T- and L-type Ca2+ channels blockers in generalized absence epilepsy. Eur J Pharmacol 406:381–389. doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00714-7 pmid:11040345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Venzi M,
    2. Di Giovanni G,
    3. Crunelli V
    (2015) A critical evaluation of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) model of absence seizures. CNS Neurosci Ther 21:123–140. doi:10.1111/cns.12337 pmid:25403866
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 39 (4)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 39, Issue 4
23 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Insights on the Role of Thalamocortical HCN Channels in Absence Epilepsy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Insights on the Role of Thalamocortical HCN Channels in Absence Epilepsy
Gábor Kozák
Journal of Neuroscience 23 January 2019, 39 (4) 578-580; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2063-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Insights on the Role of Thalamocortical HCN Channels in Absence Epilepsy
Gábor Kozák
Journal of Neuroscience 23 January 2019, 39 (4) 578-580; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2063-18.2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Selective and Systems-Level Face Processing Impairments in ASD
  • Transplanted Astrocytes Show Functional Flexibility in the Recipient Brain
  • Social Experience during Adolescence Shapes Maturation of Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons in the Left Orbitofrontal Cortex
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.