Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveal the Neural Signatures of Dietary Self-Control?

Cassandra J. Lowe and Amy C. Reichelt
Journal of Neuroscience 23 January 2019, 39 (4) 581-583; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1972-18.2018
Cassandra J. Lowe
1BrainsCAN, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building,
2Brain and Mind Institute, Department of Psychology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cassandra J. Lowe
Amy C. Reichelt
1BrainsCAN, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building,
3Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amy C. Reichelt
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The modern “obesogenic” environment is characterized by an abundance of readily available hyperpalatable, energy-dense foods. These foods are highly valued and extremely rewarding: exposure to these foods and associated cues activates a diverse brain network underlying reward processing and valuation (Stice and Yokum, 2016). Such reward-related cortical and subcortical responsivity is thought to override homeostatic processes, evoking overconsumption in the absence of hunger. This is of concern because excessive consumption of obesogenic foods rather than healthier alternatives is a primary factor underlying the current obesity epidemic (Crino et al., 2015).

How then do individuals maintain a healthy diet in the modern food-rich environment? Healthy dietary habits involve the consistent selection of less appealing, but more nutritious, foods over more tempting ones. Individuals vary substantially in their ability to exercise such dietary regulation, and this variability is thought to be associated with differences in the structural and functional integrity of the prefrontal cortex (PFC). That is, maintaining healthy dietary habits may be particularly dependent on the ability to inhibit visceral and autonomic responses (e.g., food cravings) to appetitive calorie-dense foods, which in turn depends on cognitive control mechanisms mediated by the PFC (Vainik et al., 2013).

Within the PFC, the dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) is thought to a play a critical role in the “top-down” control over actions (MacDonald et al., 2000). Specifically, the cognitive control mechanisms implemented by the dlPFC are proposed to work in tandem with the striatum and ventromedial PFC (vmPFC) to regulate the valuation of appetitive rewards, allowing the selection of foods on the basis of health rather than taste (Hare et al., 2009). Decreased regulatory control from the dlPFC in conjunction with stronger reward valuation inputs from the vmPFC may override health goals, increasing the likelihood that individuals will select food items on the basis of taste rather than healthiness (Hare et al., 2009). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used to decrease cortical activity in the left dlPFC, allowing examination of the relationship between dlPFC activity and the regulation of eating behavior. Following active rTMS, participants reported stronger cravings for high-calorie food items, consumed significantly more palatable calorie-dense foods in a taste test, and showed significant reductions in task performance on standardized measures of inhibitory control (i.e., Stroop and Flanker tasks; Lowe et al., 2014, 2018). A mediation analysis revealed that the increased palatable food consumption following left dlPFC rTMS was due to reduced inhibitory control, leading to the conclusion that dlPFC activity has a key function in regulating palatable food consumption (Lowe et al., 2018).

In a recent study, Schmidt et al. (2018) sought to expand on these findings by examining whether individual differences in dietary self-regulation were also associated with neuroanatomical differences within dlPFC and vmPFC, measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Specifically, the authors integrated voxel-based morphometry and structural data from three studies examining individuals' subjective appraisals of the relative “healthiness” of food images. These results were generalized to a fourth dataset that examined dietary self-control through a task interrogating how much money participants would be willing to pay for certain foods either with the instruction to mentally “distance themselves” from urges to consume desirable foods or without any cognitive regulation. Results indicated that the combined volume of the dlPFC and vmPFC predicted dietary self-regulatory success (i.e., how much participants reported that they would like to eat a food item based on health or taste ratings). It was therefore posited that the increased gray matter volumes of the vmPFC and dlPFC were neural substrates of regulatory success when focusing on the healthiness of food. This complements previous work that found obesity to be associated with reduced gray matter volumes in the anterior cingulate, vmPFC, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and inferior parietal and temporal cortices—other key regions associated with dietary self-regulation and cognitive control (García-García et al., 2018)—suggesting that lower gray matter volume might impair dietary self-regulation, leading to obesity.

What explains the link between PFC volume and dietary control? The critical role of the PFC in regulating striatal reward signals to override the temptation to consume highly palatable, but unhealthy foods has been functionally demonstrated by optogenetic elevation of PFC activity, which evoked the suppression of striatal reward-related neural signals (Ferenczi et al., 2016). A more active PFC would be more effective at suppressing food rewards in the striatum and vmPFC. Therefore, Schimdt et al. (2018) observation of increased gray matter volume may reflect increased dendritic length, complexity, and spine density in the dlPFC and vmPFC stemming from neuroplasticity related to increased activity (Markham and Greenough, 2004; Kasai et al., 2010). However, gray matter volumes may not be the most accurate reflection of cortical structure and function. For instance, a recent MRI study demonstrated that the density, rather than the volume, of PFC gray matter is critical to the optimization of cognitive control (Gennatas et al., 2017). Another study (Breukelaar et al., 2017) found that decreased gray matter volume within regions of the cognitive control network (dlPFC, vmPFC, anterior cingulate, and parietal cortex) was correlated with improved performance on executive function tasks. Likewise, Takeuchi et al. (2017) demonstrated that whole-brain gray matter volume was associated with improved cognitive performance in Stroop interference and working memory tasks, but there was no significant association between task performance and gray matter volume in predefined cortical areas, including the dlPFC. Therefore, how gray matter volume in the dlPFC and vmPFC is related to enhanced dietary regulation abilities is still to be determined. Future studies should examine whether regional changes in gray matter volume and altered functionality across cortical regions are associated with diet success.

It is also possible that white matter tract integrity and connectivity between regions are better predictors of cognitive control and obesity than gray matter volumes. The integrity of the white matter tracts connecting the vmPFC and ventrolateral PFC with posterior cortices are associated with executive function task performance (Smolker et al., 2015). Moreover, decreased integrity of white matter tracts between the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and OFC was negatively associated with body fat percentages in chronic dieters (Chen et al., 2017). Therefore, reductions in white matter integrity along this tract may predispose individuals to overconsume appetitive high-calorie foods by limiting the ability of the IFG, a region associated with executive control, to override reward signals within the OFC. Given that the ability of the dlPFC to exert control over value signals in the vmPFC is associated with individual differences in dietary self-regulation (Hare et al., 2009), future research should investigate whether this association is related to the integrity of white matter tracts connecting these two areas.

Another important question is whether developmental factors underlie differences in dlPFC and vmPFC structural integrity. The developing brain is highly susceptible to environmental insults, including nutrition, which can derail the natural course of brain maturation. The PFC is one of the last brain regions to mature; thus, synaptic pruning and refinement of white matter tracts across adolescence leads to enduring changes in connectivity between reward signaling and cognitive control areas (Giedd et al., 1999). Rodent studies have demonstrated that excessive consumption of obesogenic foods during adolescence negatively impacts function in medial PFC (a region homologous to the human dlPFC), resulting in impaired behavioral flexibility (Labouesse et al., 2017) and decision-making (Reichelt et al., 2015). Correspondingly, in humans, a history of excessive obesogenic food consumption is associated with reduced sensitivity to value changes of food rewards, which can lead to habitual or compulsive overeating—hallmarks of behavioral dysregulation and loss of control (Horstmann et al., 2015). Considering the importance of self-regulation in dietary success, diet-evoked variability in the functional calibration of the PFC may be a critical mechanism underpinning maladaptive eating behaviors. Since regional activity, like connectivity, can change over time, the dlPFC and vmPFC may be targets for interventions promoting healthy food choices.

Although the findings by Schmidt et al. (2018) highlighted the role that structural differences play in dietary self-regulation, more work is necessary to elucidate how these structural differences translate into functional differences in cortical responsivity during food choices. Comparing resting-state and task-dependent activity levels in the vmPFC and dlPFC between groups of individuals who are successful at making healthy food choices and those who are not could provide a starting point for cognitive training interventions to optimize plasticity. Following dietary regulation training, volumetric changes to the vmPFC and dlPFC combined with structural and functional connectivity may provide a measure of activity-driven neuroplasticity processes in neural networks essential for self-control. Thus, the neurobiological insight provided by functional and structural imaging could identify ways to break habitual eating behaviors and facilitate dietary decision-making to support dietary modification.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/preparing-manuscript#journalclub.

  • C.J.L. and A.C.R. are the recipients of BrainsCAN Postdoctoral Fellowships at The University of Western Ontario, funded by the Canada First Research Excellence Fund.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Amy C. Reichelt at areiche4{at}uwo.ca

References

  1. ↵
    1. Breukelaar IA,
    2. Antees C,
    3. Grieve SM,
    4. Foster SL,
    5. Gomes L,
    6. Williams LM,
    7. Korgaonkar MS
    (2017) Cognitive control network anatomy correlates with neurocognitive behavior: a longitudinal study. Hum Brain Mapp 38:631–643. doi:10.1002/hbm.23401 pmid:27623046
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Chen PA,
    2. Chavez RS,
    3. Heatherton TF
    (2017) Structural integrity between executive control and reward regions of the brain predicts body fat percentage in chronic dieters. Cogn Neurosci 8:162–166. doi:10.1080/17588928.2016.1235556 pmid:27663021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Crino M,
    2. Sacks G,
    3. Vandevijvere S,
    4. Swinburn B,
    5. Neal B
    (2015) The influence on population weight gain and obesity of the macronutrient composition and energy density of the food supply. Curr Obes Rep 4:1–10. doi:10.1007/s13679-014-0134-7 pmid:26627085
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ferenczi EA,
    2. Zalocusky KA,
    3. Liston C,
    4. Grosenick L,
    5. Warden MR,
    6. Amatya D,
    7. Katovich K,
    8. Mehta H,
    9. Patenaude B,
    10. Ramakrishnan C,
    11. Kalanithi P,
    12. Etkin A,
    13. Knutson B,
    14. Glover GH,
    15. Deisseroth K
    (2016) Prefrontal cortical regulation of brainwide circuit dynamics and reward-related behavior. Science 351:aac9698. doi:10.1126/science.aac9698 pmid:26722001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. García-García I,
    2. Michaud A,
    3. Dadar M,
    4. Zeighami Y,
    5. Neseliler S,
    6. Collins DL,
    7. Dagher A
    (2018) Neuroanatomical differences in obesity: meta-analytic findings and their validation in an independent dataset. Int J Obes (Lond). Advance online publication. Retrieved November 25, 2018. doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0164-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Gennatas ED,
    2. Avants BB,
    3. Wolf DH,
    4. Satterthwaite TD,
    5. Ruparel K,
    6. Ciric R,
    7. Hakonarson H,
    8. Gur RE,
    9. Gur RC
    (2017) Age-related effects and sex differences in gray matter density, volume, mass, and cortical thickness from childhood to young adulthood. J Neurosci 37:5065–5073. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3550-16.2017 pmid:28432144
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Giedd JN,
    2. Blumenthal J,
    3. Jeffries NO,
    4. Castellanos FX,
    5. Liu H,
    6. Zijdenbos A,
    7. Paus T,
    8. Evans AC,
    9. Rapoport JL
    (1999) Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nat Neurosci 2:861–863. doi:10.1038/13158 pmid:10491603
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hare TA,
    2. Camerer CF,
    3. Rangel A
    (2009) Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 324:646–648. doi:10.1126/science.1168450 pmid:19407204
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Horstmann A,
    2. Dietrich A,
    3. Mathar D,
    4. Pössel M,
    5. Villringer A,
    6. Neumann J
    (2015) Slave to habit? obesity is associated with decreased behavioural sensitivity to reward devaluation. Appetite 87:175–183. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.212 pmid:25543077
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Kasai H,
    2. Fukuda M,
    3. Watanabe S,
    4. Hayashi-Takagi A,
    5. Noguchi J
    (2010) Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition. Trends Neurosci 33:121–129. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2010.01.001 pmid:20138375
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Labouesse MA,
    2. Lassalle O,
    3. Richetto J,
    4. Iafrati J,
    5. Weber-Stadlbauer U,
    6. Notter T,
    7. Gschwind T,
    8. Pujadas L,
    9. Soriano E,
    10. Reichelt AC,
    11. Labouesse C,
    12. Langhans W,
    13. Chavis P,
    14. Meyer U
    (2017) Hypervulnerability of the adolescent prefrontal cortex to nutritional stress via reelin deficiency. Mol Psychiatry 22:961–971. doi:10.1038/mp.2016.193 pmid:27843148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Lowe CJ,
    2. Hall PA,
    3. Staines WR
    (2014) The effects of continuous theta burst stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on executive function, food cravings, and snack food consumption. Psychosom Med 76:503–511. doi:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000090 pmid:25215552
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Lowe CJ,
    2. Staines WR,
    3. Manocchio F,
    4. Hall PA
    (2018) The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying food cravings and snack food consumption. A combined continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and EEG study. Neuroimage 177:45–58. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.013 pmid:29742385
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. MacDonald AW,
    2. Cohen JD,
    3. Stenger VA,
    4. Carter CS
    (2000) Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288:1835–1838. doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 pmid:10846167
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Markham JA,
    2. Greenough WT
    (2004) Experience-driven brain plasticity: beyond the synapse. Neuron Glia Biol 1:351–363. doi:10.1017/s1740925x05000219 pmid:16921405
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Reichelt AC,
    2. Killcross S,
    3. Hambly LD,
    4. Morris MJ,
    5. Westbrook RF
    (2015) Impact of adolescent sucrose access on cognitive control, recognition memory, and parvalbumin immunoreactivity. Learn Mem 22:215–224. doi:10.1101/lm.038000.114 pmid:25776039
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Schmidt L,
    2. Tusche A,
    3. Manoharan N,
    4. Hutcherson C,
    5. Hare T,
    6. Plassmann H
    (2018) Neuroanatomy of the vmPFC and dlPFC predicts individual differences in cognitive regulation during dietary self-control across regulation strategies. J Neurosci 38:5799–5806. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3402-17.2018 pmid:29866743
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Smolker HR,
    2. Depue BE,
    3. Reineberg AE,
    4. Orr JM,
    5. Banich MT
    (2015) Individual differences in regional prefrontal gray matter morphometry and fractional anisotropy are associated with different constructs of executive function. Brain Struct Funct 220:1291–1306. doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0723-y pmid:24562372
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Stice E,
    2. Yokum S
    (2016) Neural vulnerability that increase risk for future weight gain. Psychol Bull 142:447–471. doi:10.1037/bul0000044 pmid:26854866
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Takeuchi H,
    2. Taki Y,
    3. Nouchi R,
    4. Yokoyama R,
    5. Kotozaki Y,
    6. Nakagawa S,
    7. Sekiguchi A,
    8. Iizuka K,
    9. Yamamoto Y,
    10. Hanawa S,
    11. Araki T,
    12. Miyauchi CM,
    13. Shinada T,
    14. Sakaki K,
    15. Sassa Y,
    16. Nozawa T,
    17. Ikeda S,
    18. Yokota S,
    19. Daniele M,
    20. Kawashima R
    (2017) Global associations between regional gray matter volume and diverse complex cognitive functions: evidence from a large sample study. Sci Rep 7:10014. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10104-8 pmid:28855703
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Vainik U,
    2. Dagher A,
    3. Dubé L,
    4. Fellows LK
    (2013) Neurobehavioural correlates of body mass index and eating behaviours in adults: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:279–299. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.008 pmid:23261403
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 39 (4)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 39, Issue 4
23 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveal the Neural Signatures of Dietary Self-Control?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveal the Neural Signatures of Dietary Self-Control?
Cassandra J. Lowe, Amy C. Reichelt
Journal of Neuroscience 23 January 2019, 39 (4) 581-583; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1972-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveal the Neural Signatures of Dietary Self-Control?
Cassandra J. Lowe, Amy C. Reichelt
Journal of Neuroscience 23 January 2019, 39 (4) 581-583; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1972-18.2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Selective and Systems-Level Face Processing Impairments in ASD
  • Transplanted Astrocytes Show Functional Flexibility in the Recipient Brain
  • Social Experience during Adolescence Shapes Maturation of Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons in the Left Orbitofrontal Cortex
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.