Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Erratum

Erratum: Galinato et al., “Neurogenesis during Abstinence Is Necessary for Context-Driven Methamphetamine-Related Memory”

Journal of Neuroscience 2 October 2019, 39 (40) 7992; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1959-19.2019
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

In the article “Neurogenesis during Abstinence Is Necessary for Context-Driven Methamphetamine-Related Memory,” by Melissa H. Galinato, Yoshio Takashima, McKenzie J. Fannon, Leon W. Quach, Roberto J. Morales Silva, Karthik K. Mysore, Michael J. Terranova, Rahul R. Dutta, Ryan W. Ostrom, Sucharita S. Somkuwar, and Chitra D. Mandyam, which appeared on pages 2029–2042 of the February 21, 2018, issue, Figure 6 appeared incorrectly.

The number of animals and the number of cells for electrophysiology studies have been reported incorrectly. The control group in Figure 6 for the electrophysiology experiment included data from n = 2 male Wistar rats in addition to n = 2 male GFAP-TK rats. The electrophysiology data for control rats between the two strains were not significantly different, and therefore were combined in Figure 6. The correct number of animals and cells for each condition are as follows: controls: n = 4 rats, n = 13 cells; TK-Valcyte rats: n = 3 rats; n = 7–8 cells; TK+Valcyte rats: n = 2 rats, n = 15 cells).

Additionally, the nonsignificant data in Figure 6k for the group TK-Valcyte is reported incorrectly. “Time to peak 224 ± 28.0” should be “228 ± 24.5”; “peak amp 46.7 ± 2.4” should be “46.2 ± 4.8”; “half-width 3.1 ± 0.1” should be “3.3 ± 0.2”; “decay slope −20.2 ± 1.4” should be “−14.2 ± 2.2”; “sAHP 1.1 ± 0.3” should be “0.4 ± 0.5”; “rheobase 86.8 ± 3.3” should be “121 ± 16.5”; and “spike threshold −37.0 ± 1.8” should be “−38.9 ± 2.9”.

The authors state, “These oversights did not materially affect the content of the paper and do not affect the conclusions of the paper as the statistical analyses were conducted on the correct number of cells in each group and were nonsignificant and remain nonsignificant”. The corrected figure and its legend appear below, and the online version has been corrected. Fig. 6

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

a, Representative image of the granule cell layer with GCNs and indication of the patch pipette on a selected neuron. Scale bar, 25 μm. b–d, Representative spontaneous EPSC (sEPSC) traces in voltage-clamp recording from control (b), TK-Valcyte (c), and TK+Valcyte (d) rats. e–g, Representative traces of action potentials elicited by depolarizing current injections. Traces were recorded from GCNs from control (e; drug and behavior naive n = 2 male GFAP-TK rats and n = 2 male Wistar rats; the electrophysiology data between the two strains were not significantly different and therefore were combined), TK-Valcyte (f; n = 3 rats) and TK+Valcyte (g; n = 2 rats) rats. h, Frequency of sEPSCs in Hz from neurons. i, Average of all amplitudes of all sEPSCs above −10 pA from GCNs. j, Graphical relationship between the number of spikes elicited by increasing current injections in current-clamp recording. k, Electrophysiological properties of GCNs from control, TK−Valcyte, and TK+Valcyte rats. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. Number of GCNs: n = 8–13 controls, n = 7–8 TK-Valcyte, and n = 15 TK+Valcyte. *p < 0.05 vs. controls and #p < 0.05 vs TK+Valcyte by ANOVA.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 39 (40)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 39, Issue 40
2 Oct 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Erratum: Galinato et al., “Neurogenesis during Abstinence Is Necessary for Context-Driven Methamphetamine-Related Memory”
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Erratum: Galinato et al., “Neurogenesis during Abstinence Is Necessary for Context-Driven Methamphetamine-Related Memory”
Journal of Neuroscience 2 October 2019, 39 (40) 7992; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1959-19.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Erratum: Galinato et al., “Neurogenesis during Abstinence Is Necessary for Context-Driven Methamphetamine-Related Memory”
Journal of Neuroscience 2 October 2019, 39 (40) 7992; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1959-19.2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Erratum: Patel et al., “Improved Speech Hearing in Noise with Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation”
  • Erratum: Ibáñez et al., “Only the Fastest Corticospinal Fibers Contribute to β Corticomuscular Coherence”
  • Erratum: Larson et al., “Soluble α-Synuclein Is a Novel Modulator of Alzheimer's Disease Pathophysiology”
Show more Erratum
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.