Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleResearch Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

X-Chromosome Insufficiency Alters Receptive Fields across the Human Early Visual Cortex

Tamar Green, Hadi Hosseini, Aaron Piccirilli, Alexandra Ishak, Kalanit Grill-Spector and Allan L. Reiss
Journal of Neuroscience 9 October 2019, 39 (41) 8079-8088; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2745-18.2019
Tamar Green
1Division of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tamar Green
Hadi Hosseini
1Division of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron Piccirilli
1Division of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra Ishak
1Division of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kalanit Grill-Spector
2Neurosciences Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305,
3Psychology Department,
4Stanford Neurosciences Institute, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kalanit Grill-Spector
Allan L. Reiss
1Division of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305,
2Neurosciences Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305,
4Stanford Neurosciences Institute, and
5Departments of Radiology and Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Allan L. Reiss
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Polar angle and eccentricity maps are qualitatively similar in girls with TS and sex- and age-matched controls. A, Polar angle maps on the right visual cortex from an example 11-year-old girl with TS and an example 11-year-old typically developing girl. Color wheel represents polar angle. B, Eccentricity maps in the same subjects. Color wheel represents eccentricity. Lines along the visual cortex were drawn marking the boundaries of visual maps: V1, V2 dorsal and ventral, and V3 dorsal and ventral. Polar angle maps (C) and eccentricity maps (D) in the right hemisphere of all participants. Top, TS. Bottom, Controls. Maps represent the central 10° and are thresholded at 5% variance explained, voxel-level.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Visual maps differ in size and pRF differ in eccentricity between TS and controls. A, Mean cortical volume of V1, V2, and V3 in TS (red) (n = 20) and controls (blue) (n = 22). B, Mean population receptive field (pRF) size in TS versus controls. C, Mean pRF eccentricity in TS versus controls. A–C, Boxplots represent the following information. Black horizontal line indicates median. Box represents interquartile range. Vertical lines indicate maximum and minimum scores, which are no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range. *p < 0.05, significant differences between groups. D, pRF size versus eccentricity relationship in TS and controls. The line of best fit (solid line) and the SE (dashed line) indicate the relationship between pRF eccentricity and size in units of degrees of visual angle (dva). Fits are calculated in each participant; slopes and intercepts are then averaged across participants.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Visual field coverage is qualitatively similar in girls with Turner Syndrome and controls. Visual field coverage of V1–V3 computed using the average maximum pRF density coverage for each subject and then averaged across subjects from each group. Maps are shown for the left and right hemisphere data. Top, Turner Syndrome. Bottom, Controls. Inner to outermost ring segments correspond to 3.4, 6.7, and 10 degrees of visual angle (dva), respectively. Color bar represents average maximum pRF coverage.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Peripheral pRFs differ between girls with TS and controls. A, Location of pRF centers in the visual field from bilateral V1–V3 is plotted for Turner Syndrome (red) and controls (blue). Each dot represents a voxel. Visual evaluation suggests that the coverage in the peripheral visual field in Turner Syndrome is sparser compared with controls. B, Mean number of pRF centers in 0°–4.99°,5°–9.99°, and 10°–15° bands compared between TS and controls. *p < 0.05, significant differences between groups. C, kernel density estimation (KDE) of pRF centers' location in the visual field for controls (left) and Turner Syndrome (right).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Picture Puzzles performance is negatively correlated with pRF size in Turner Syndrome. Left, Boxplots represent performance in the Picture Puzzles task in 18 Turner Syndrome (red) and 22 control (blue) participants. Right, Pearson correlation quantifying the relationship between participants' scores in the Picture Puzzles task and their pRF size, separately for Turner Syndrome (red) and control (blue) groups. Each dot represents a participant. Shaded area represents 95% confidence interval (CI) for each group. Each panel represents a visual area. Top, Correlation between performance and pRF size. Bottom, Correlation between performance and eccentricity.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographics and clinical characteristicsa

    TSControlsp
    No. of participants2022—
    Age, yr10.3 (2.0)10.4 (1.9)NS
    Age range, yr7.0–13.17.0–13.8—
    SexFemaleFemale—
    Tanner stagebpubic (breast)pubic (breast)NS
        ≤2,17 (20)16 (17)—
        33 (1)3 (2)—
        40 (0)3 (3)—
        50 (0)0 (0)—
    FSIQ96.0 (12.3)116.9 (10.9)<0.001
    VCI105.5 (13.1)117 (13.6)<0.01
    PRI97.3 (13.8)115.4 (11.3)<0.001
    PSI88.8 (15.9)105.9 (15.4)<0.01
    WMI91.4 (12.0)109.4 (13.7)<0.001
    Picture Puzzles scaledc6.9 (3.5)10.6 (3.7)<0.01
    • ↵aValues are mean ± SD. Welch two-sample t test was used to assess significance between groups. FSIQ, Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient; VCI, Verbal Comprehension Index; PRI, Perceptual Reasoning Index; PSI, Processing Speed Intelligence; WMI, Working Memory Intelligence.

    • ↵bp = 0.38 for pubic hair and p = 0.08 for breast development on Tanner stages of development for females (Fisher's Exact Test, given the small number of participants with Tanner Stages 3 and 4).

    • ↵cn = 18 for the TS group.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 39 (41)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 39, Issue 41
9 Oct 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
X-Chromosome Insufficiency Alters Receptive Fields across the Human Early Visual Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
X-Chromosome Insufficiency Alters Receptive Fields across the Human Early Visual Cortex
Tamar Green, Hadi Hosseini, Aaron Piccirilli, Alexandra Ishak, Kalanit Grill-Spector, Allan L. Reiss
Journal of Neuroscience 9 October 2019, 39 (41) 8079-8088; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2745-18.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
X-Chromosome Insufficiency Alters Receptive Fields across the Human Early Visual Cortex
Tamar Green, Hadi Hosseini, Aaron Piccirilli, Alexandra Ishak, Kalanit Grill-Spector, Allan L. Reiss
Journal of Neuroscience 9 October 2019, 39 (41) 8079-8088; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2745-18.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • retinotopy
  • sex differences
  • Turner syndrome
  • visual cortex
  • visuospatial cognition

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Non-canonical Taste Transduction of Sugars Elicits Responses in a Dedicated Subset of Gustatory Afferent Neurons
  • Individual pulvinar neurons integrate cortical and subcortical signals
  • Gyral crowns contribute to the cortical infrastructure of human face processing
Show more Research Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Gyral crowns contribute to the cortical infrastructure of human face processing
  • Altered regional brain activity underlying the higher postoperative analgesic requirements in abstinent smokers: A prospective cohort study
  • Contributions of distinct attention mechanisms to saccadic choices in a gamified, dynamic environment
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.