Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Motoneuron death and motor unit size during embryonic development of the rat

AJ Harris and CD McCaig
Journal of Neuroscience 1 January 1984, 4 (1) 13-24; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-01-00013.1984
AJ Harris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CD McCaig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Chronic paralysis of rat embryos during the last 4 to 6 prenatal days causes a diminution in skeletal muscle fiber numbers but inhibits motoneuron death. Consequently, as paralyzed muscles develop, an increased number of motoneurons attempts to form synapses at a reduced number of synaptic sites. Paralyzed muscle fibers receive their synapses at a single endplate, as in control muscles, but these endplates are hyperinnervated, with about twice the normal number of inputs. Counts of axons, synaptic inputs, and muscle units showed that motoneurons normally contact a maximum number of muscle fibers shortly before birth, and this number remains stable for several days postnatal until it finally is reduced to the adult number. The average motor unit size in paralyzed embryos at the time of birth was the same as in controls. We suggest that it is not necessary to postulate the existence of competition between embryonic nerve terminals in order to explain regulation of the number of muscle fibers initially contacted by a motoneuron. Motoneuron death was not immediately affected by paralysis, but paralysis “rescued” all motoneurons whose death normally would have occurred 24 hr or more after the time when paralysis was initiated, regardless of when this was. This implies that the peak period for determination to die is during embryonic day 14, when myotube formation is just beginning and no recognizable endplate structures are present in muscles. When paralyzed, motoneurons normally destined to die are capable of forming a normal number of functional nerve-muscle contacts.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 4 (1)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 4, Issue 1
1 Jan 1984
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Motoneuron death and motor unit size during embryonic development of the rat
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Motoneuron death and motor unit size during embryonic development of the rat
AJ Harris, CD McCaig
Journal of Neuroscience 1 January 1984, 4 (1) 13-24; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-01-00013.1984

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Motoneuron death and motor unit size during embryonic development of the rat
AJ Harris, CD McCaig
Journal of Neuroscience 1 January 1984, 4 (1) 13-24; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-01-00013.1984
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.