Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Receptive field properties in the cat's area 17 in the absence of on- center geniculate input

H Sherk and JC Horton
Journal of Neuroscience 1 February 1984, 4 (2) 381-393; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-02-00381.1984
H Sherk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JC Horton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Most neurons of area 17 in the cat respond to both light and dark stimuli, and it is often assumed that these responses originate from the on-center and off-center cells, respectively, of the lateral geniculate nucleus. This has not been demonstrated experimentally, however. Whether the on and off pathways make unique contributions to some of the response properties characteristic of visual cortex, such as orientation selectivity, is also unknown. The aim of these experiments was to investigate these questions by inactivating the retinogeniculate on pathway. In cats in which D,L-2-amino-4- phosphonobutyric acid (APB) had been injected into one eye, we found that, in the geniculate layers driven by that eye, there were no cells with on-center responses (Horton, J. C., and H. Sherk (1984) J. Neurosci. 4: 374–380). The on pathway appeared to have been inactivated. To see how cortical receptive fields were affected, we examined 184 binocular cells in area 17 contralateral to the injected eye. Each cell still had a normal receptive field in the ipsilateral eye, and we compared the cell's response properties in that eye with those in the eye injected with APB to assess the drug's effects. Overall responsiveness in the injected eye was severely reduced, and responses to the onset of stationary light stimuli were almost entirely abolished. Responses to moving light edges were weak or absent in most cells but still strong in a few; simple cells tended to have more vigorous light edge responses than complex cells. The general reduction in responsiveness, and the specific reduction in light edge responses, indicated that the on and off pathways both contribute (directly or indirectly) to the responses of most cells in area 17. The remaining responses to light edges we think originated mainly from the on- surrounds of off-center geniculate cells. Responses to moving dark edges were somewhat depressed compared to those in the normal eye. There was, however, no systematic change in direction selectivity and no reduction in specificity for orientation or length. In general, receptive field properties remained surprisingly normal despite the conspicuous reduction in responsiveness.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 4 (2)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 4, Issue 2
1 Feb 1984
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Receptive field properties in the cat's area 17 in the absence of on- center geniculate input
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Receptive field properties in the cat's area 17 in the absence of on- center geniculate input
H Sherk, JC Horton
Journal of Neuroscience 1 February 1984, 4 (2) 381-393; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-02-00381.1984

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Receptive field properties in the cat's area 17 in the absence of on- center geniculate input
H Sherk, JC Horton
Journal of Neuroscience 1 February 1984, 4 (2) 381-393; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-02-00381.1984
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.