Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Viewpoints

Revisiting the Stress Concept: Implications for Affective Disorders

Bruce S. McEwen and Huda Akil
Journal of Neuroscience 2 January 2020, 40 (1) 12-21; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0733-19.2019
Bruce S. McEwen
1The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huda Akil
2University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The brain is a primary organ that perceives and responds to what is stressful to an individual. The major function of cortisol and other mediators of allostasis is to promote adaptation. However, overuse and/or dysregulation among the mediators of allostasis lead to allostatic load (or overload) and accelerate disease processes such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and affective disorders. Three limbic brain regions are noted.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Key elements of the limbic HPA. Glucocorticoids feed back to the brain to restrain the stress response. They produce their actions via GRs and MRs, which are generally classified as ligand-dependent transcription factors that are expressed in multiple brain regions, especially the hippocampus. Glucocorticoid effects in the brain involve not only direct and indirect genomic actions, but also direct stimulation of glutamate release and stimulation of endocannabinoid production, which then feed back on glutamate and GABA release and actions in mitochondria to affect Ca2+ buffering and free radical formation. BDNF, in the presence of glucocorticoids, phosphorylates the GR at sites that facilitate its translocation to the cell nucleus for transcriptional actions; this effect is synergistic with the ability of glucocorticoids to promote the phosphorylation of the TrkB receptor independently of BDNF. Table 1 refers to mechanistic studies of mediators and cellular processes that are involved in the remodeling of neurons in hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Glucocorticoids, excitatory amino acids and other mediators and processes noted in Table 1 operate in a nonlinear, biphasic manner to promote adaptive plasticity, on the one hand, and to impair resilience and promote damage, on the other hand. Lack of resilience in the aftermath of stressful experiences needs external intervention, as is the case for affective disorders.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Some molecules implicated in stress-related remodeling in hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex

    General classMoleculeFunctionReferences
    Secreted signaling moleculesBDNFFacilitates plasticity or growth
    Floor and ceiling effects
    Chen et al., 2006; Govindarajan et al., 2006; Bath et al., 2013
    FGF2Facilitates neuroplasticity and neurogenesis in development and adulthoodPerez et al., 2009 ; Turner et al, 2012
    t-PAMediates stress-induced spine loss in CA1 hippocampus and medial amygdala
    t-PA release regulated by CRF
    Pawlak et al., 2003, 2005; Matys et al., 2004; Bennur et al., 2007
    Lipocalin-2 secreted proteinInduced by acute stress
    Lipocalin-2 knockout increases neuronal excitability and anxiety.
    Mucha et al., 2011; Skrzypiec et al., 2013
    EndocannabinoidsInduced via glucocorticoids
    Regulate emotionality, HPA habituation and turn off
    Buffer against stress induced remodeling
    Hill and McEwen, 2010; Hill et al., 2010, 2013; Gunduz-Cinar et al., 2013
    CRF after t-PAStimulates rPA release; mediates plasticity of spine synapsesMatys et al., 2004; Regev and Baram, 2014
    Cell surface and nucleo–cytoplasmic interactionsPSA-NCAMCell surface “anti-stickiness”
    Endonuclease N removes PSA from NCAM; dendrite expansion
    Facilitate plasticity but also limits it
    Sandi, 2004; Rutishauser, 2008; McCall et al., 2013; Nacher et al., 2013
    Cell adhesion moleculesChronic stress disrupts neuroligin–neurexin interaction
    Chronic stress reduces nectin-3 via MMP9 protease
    van der Kooij et al., 2014a,b
    NUP62Reduction leads to dendrite shrinkage
    Possibly due to nuclear-cytoplasmic communication
    Kinoshita et al., 2014
    • t-PA, Tissue plasminogen activator; PSA-NCAM, polysialic acid linked to neural cell adhesion molecule; rPA, raphe pallidus.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Experience changes hippocampal volume

    CauseReferences
    Hippocampal shrinkageChronic stressGianaros et al., 2007a,b, 2008, 2014
    Major depressionSheline et al., 2019
    PTSDVythilingam et al., 2002; Pitman et al., 2006
    Borderline personality disorderDriessen et al., 2000
    Cushing's diseaseStarkman et al., 1992, 1999
    Dementiade Leon et al., 1988
    Type 2 diabetesGold et al., 2007; Yau et al., 2012
    Chronic inflammationMarsland et al., 2008
    Chronic jet lagCho, 2001
    Hippocampal enlargementExerciseErickson et al., 2011
    Intense learningDraganski et al., 2006
    • The most extensive information about structural plasticity and damage in the human brain exists for hippocampus, but there is also increasing information about such changes in structure, activity and connectivity in human amygdala and prefrontal cortex. For example, the amygdala becomes more active and undergoes structural changes in mood disorders (Price and Drevets, 2010) and to threat in people of low socioeconomic (SES) standing (Gianaros et al., 2008), while low SES was associated with smaller gray matter volume in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, reduced myelin content and greater systemic preclinical atherosclerosis and IL-6 (Gianaros et al., 2007a,b, 2014). All of these conditions include increased frequency of mood disorders.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 40 (1)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 40, Issue 1
2 Jan 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Revisiting the Stress Concept: Implications for Affective Disorders
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Revisiting the Stress Concept: Implications for Affective Disorders
Bruce S. McEwen, Huda Akil
Journal of Neuroscience 2 January 2020, 40 (1) 12-21; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0733-19.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Revisiting the Stress Concept: Implications for Affective Disorders
Bruce S. McEwen, Huda Akil
Journal of Neuroscience 2 January 2020, 40 (1) 12-21; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0733-19.2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • The major neural and molecular elements of the stress system
    • How brain and body systems continually interact for brain health and disease
    • Experience and the epigenetic life course
    • The central role of glucocorticoids and their receptors
    • Stress and affective disorders: reverse translation to animal models
    • Brain health and the broader social context
    • Future directions: the neurobiology of stress as the basic science of affective disorders
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Bruce McEwen passing
    Pat Levitt
    Published on: 03 January 2020
  • In Memory of Bruce McEwen
    Huda Akil
    Published on: 02 January 2020
  • Published on: (3 January 2020)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Bruce McEwen passing
    RE: Bruce McEwen passing
    • Pat Levitt, Professor - Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and the University of Southern California

    Driving to work early this morning in LA, after receiving the news from Michael Meaney regarding the death of Bruce McEwen, I was numb. My mind wandered, realizing how much we take for granted, in science and medicine, being touched by greatness. Maybe we know at the time, but we don’t take a deep breath and appreciate the profoundness of our colleagues and friends – the impact that they have on our values, the very high bar that they help set for us – and the acknowledgement that we are all in this to make a difference, no matter how small, no matter how large. Bruce was all of that and more to the field of neuroscience and biomedicine, to the Academies that he loved so much, to the National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, whose members he adored and who adored him, and to me personally, for being so supportive of whatever crazy ideas I expressed to him regarding the biological impact of early life stress on children and the enduring effects across their lifespan; no one was more encyclopedic and no one was more caring about children and families who he hoped would benefit from the research in which we engage.

    I will miss him deeply.

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (2 January 2020)
    Page navigation anchor for In Memory of Bruce McEwen
    In Memory of Bruce McEwen
    • Huda Akil, Professor, University of Michigan Medical School

    On January 2, 2020, on the same day that this Viewpoint paper was published, Bruce McEwen passed away. His death marks the end of an era in affective neuroscience. Fifty-two years ago, Bruce brought the brain to the study of stress biology by demonstrating the existence of glucocorticoid binding sites in the hippocampus. This was but the start of a breathtaking sequence of foundational discoveries that Bruce and his colleagues have made over the decades, entirely re-framing our thinking about this most basic of functions- coping with our environment.
    Many of the concepts we currently take for granted arose from his work, including the effects of steroid hormones on neural structure and neuroplasticity, the concept of allostatic load, the differentiation between “good” and “bad” stress, and the impact of general health on stress vulnerability and resilience. Bruce also thought deeply about the importance of social context on stress biology and brain health. His vision ranged from the molecular and mechanistic to the societal and humanistic. This review gives a flavor of that thinking but barely touches on the breadth and depth of his influence.
    Beyond being an intellectual giant, Bruce was a remarkable human. A love of knowledge, a passion for science, a prodigious memory blended miraculously with unassailable integrity, a generous and generative spirit, exemplary mentorship and the capacity for limitless kindness and friendship. I have never met a more civilize...

    Show More

    On January 2, 2020, on the same day that this Viewpoint paper was published, Bruce McEwen passed away. His death marks the end of an era in affective neuroscience. Fifty-two years ago, Bruce brought the brain to the study of stress biology by demonstrating the existence of glucocorticoid binding sites in the hippocampus. This was but the start of a breathtaking sequence of foundational discoveries that Bruce and his colleagues have made over the decades, entirely re-framing our thinking about this most basic of functions- coping with our environment.
    Many of the concepts we currently take for granted arose from his work, including the effects of steroid hormones on neural structure and neuroplasticity, the concept of allostatic load, the differentiation between “good” and “bad” stress, and the impact of general health on stress vulnerability and resilience. Bruce also thought deeply about the importance of social context on stress biology and brain health. His vision ranged from the molecular and mechanistic to the societal and humanistic. This review gives a flavor of that thinking but barely touches on the breadth and depth of his influence.
    Beyond being an intellectual giant, Bruce was a remarkable human. A love of knowledge, a passion for science, a prodigious memory blended miraculously with unassailable integrity, a generous and generative spirit, exemplary mentorship and the capacity for limitless kindness and friendship. I have never met a more civilized man. It has been one of the greatest honors of my life to know him, to collaborate with him, to learn from him, and to be his friend.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Role for Second Messengers in Axodendritic Neuronal Polarity
  • On the Role of Theory and Modeling in Neuroscience
  • The Protective Effect of Social Reward on Opioid and Psychostimulant Reward and Relapse: Behavior, Pharmacology, and Brain Regions
Show more Viewpoints

Subjects

  • 50th Anniversary
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.