Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Neurobiology of Disease

Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Protects Cerebral Cortical Neurons from Soluble Aβ-Induced Synaptic Damage

Ariel Diaz, Paola Merino, Ji-Dong Guo, Manuel A. Yepes, Patrick McCann, Tapasya Katta, Elise M. Tong, Enrique Torre, Srikant Rangaraju and Manuel Yepes
Journal of Neuroscience 20 May 2020, 40 (21) 4251-4263; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2804-19.2020
Ariel Diaz
1Division of Neuropharmacology and Neurologic Diseases, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ariel Diaz
Paola Merino
1Division of Neuropharmacology and Neurologic Diseases, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ji-Dong Guo
2Silvio O. Conte Center for Oxytocin and Social Cognition & Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel A. Yepes
1Division of Neuropharmacology and Neurologic Diseases, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick McCann
1Division of Neuropharmacology and Neurologic Diseases, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tapasya Katta
1Division of Neuropharmacology and Neurologic Diseases, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elise M. Tong
1Division of Neuropharmacology and Neurologic Diseases, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enrique Torre
1Division of Neuropharmacology and Neurologic Diseases, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Srikant Rangaraju
4Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Srikant Rangaraju
Manuel Yepes
1Division of Neuropharmacology and Neurologic Diseases, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
4Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
5Department of Neurology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30033
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Manuel Yepes
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Soluble amyloid β (Aβ)-induced synaptic dysfunction is an early event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that precedes the deposition of insoluble Aβ and correlates with the development of cognitive deficits better than the number of plaques. The mammalian plasminogen activation (PA) system catalyzes the generation of plasmin via two activators: tissue-type (tPA) and urokinase-type (uPA). A dysfunctional tPA-plasmin system causes defective proteolytic degradation of Aβ plaques in advanced stages of AD. In contrast, it is unknown whether uPA and its receptor (uPAR) contribute to the pathogenesis of this disease. Neuronal cadherin (NCAD) plays a pivotal role in the formation of synapses and dendritic branches, and Aβ decreases its expression in cerebral cortical neurons. Here we show that neuronal uPA protects the synapse from the harmful effects of soluble Aβ. However, Aβ-induced inactivation of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α halts the transcription of uPA mRNA, leaving unopposed the deleterious effects of Aβ on the synapse. In line with these observations, the synaptic abundance of uPA, but not uPAR, is decreased in the frontal cortex of AD patients and 5xFAD mice, and in cerebral cortical neurons incubated with soluble Aβ. We found that uPA treatment increases the synaptic expression of NCAD by a uPAR-mediated plasmin-independent mechanism, and that uPA-induced formation of NCAD dimers protects the synapse from the harmful effects of soluble Aβ oligomers. These data indicate that Aβ-induced decrease in the synaptic abundance of uPA contributes to the development of synaptic damage in the early stages of AD.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Soluble amyloid β (Aβ)-induced synaptic dysfunction is an early event in the pathogenesis of cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We found that neuronal urokinase-type (uPA) protects the synapse from the deleterious effects of soluble Aβ. However, Aβ-induced inactivation of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α decreases the synaptic abundance of uPA, leaving unopposed the harmful effects of Aβ on the synapse. In line with these observations, the synaptic expression of uPA is decreased in the frontal cortex of AD brains and 5xFAD mice, and uPA treatment abrogates the deleterious effects of Aβ on the synapse. These results unveil a novel mechanism of Aβ-induced synaptic dysfunction in AD patients, and indicate that recombinant uPA is a potential therapeutic strategy to protect the synapse before the development of irreversible brain damage.

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • plasmin
  • plasminogen system
  • urokinase

Introduction

Synaptic dysfunction is an early event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Davies et al., 1987; Selkoe, 2002) that precedes the deposition of amyloid β (Aβ) (Martin et al., 1994; Hsia et al., 1999) and correlates with the severity of cognitive deficits better than the number of plaques (DeKosky and Scheff, 1990; Terry et al., 1991; Jacobsen et al., 2006). Thus, understanding the pathophysiology of synaptic injury in the early stages of AD is crucial for the discovery of therapeutic strategies to protect the synapse before the development of irreversible brain damage.

The Aβ is derived from the cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein by β- and γ-secretase (Selkoe et al., 1996). The predominant isoforms of the Aβ peptide are Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 (Plant et al., 2003); and although in the early stages of AD both are soluble, at later stages insoluble forms are deposited into diffuse plaques (Kawarabayashi et al., 2001). It was initially believed that fibrillar Aβ accumulated in plaques was toxic to the synapse. However, subsequent studies showed that this is not the case, and instead that soluble nonfibrillar Aβ is more toxic than the fibrillar forms (Lambert et al., 1998). In line with these observations, soluble Aβ oligomers have a harmful impact on synaptic plasticity and the composition and function of axonal boutons (He et al., 2019) and dendritic spines (Lacor et al., 2007; Shankar et al., 2007).

The plasminogen activation (PA) system is assembled by a cascade of enzymes and their inhibitors that catalyze the generation of plasmin. There are two mammalian plasminogen activators: tissue-type (tPA) and urokinase-type (uPA) (Collen, 1999). A dysfunctional tPA-plasminogen system in advanced stages of AD has been linked to defective plasmin-induced cleavage of Aβ-containing plaques (Tucker et al., 2000) and Aβ-induced neurodegeneration (Melchor et al., 2003). In contrast, although some studies indicate that Aβ induces the release of uPA in cell cultures (Davis et al., 2003), the roleof this plasminogen activator in the pathogenesis of AD is unknown.

Neuronal cadherin (NCAD) is a Type I cadherin that in the mature brain is found in glutamatergic synapses of the II/III and V cortical layers (Uchida et al., 1996; Benson and Tanaka, 1998). NCAD expression is modulated by synaptic activity (Shan et al., 2002) and regulates the formation of synapses and dendritic branches in excitatory neurons (Sanes and Yamagata, 1999; Honjo et al., 2000; Togashi et al., 2002; Mendez et al., 2010). Importantly, NCAD coimmunoprecipitates with amyloid precursor protein (Asada-Utsugi et al., 2011) and Aβ decreases the expression of NCAD in cerebral cortical neurons (Ando et al., 2011).

Here we show that neuronal uPA protects the synapse from the harmful effects of soluble Aβ. However, Aβ-induced protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK)-mediated phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) at serine 51 halts the transcription of uPA mRNA in neurons, leaving unopposed the harmful effect of Aβ on the synapse. In line with these observations, the synaptic expression of uPA, but not uPA receptor (uPAR), is decreased in the frontal cortex of AD patients and 5xFAD mice, and in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated with soluble Aβ 1-42 oligomers. This effect is cell type- and organ-specific as is not observed in astrocytes, aorta, or kidneys of 5xFAD mice, or in WT astrocytes incubated with Aβ 1-42 oligomers. Finally, we found that uPA treatment increases the synaptic expression of NCAD by an uPAR-mediated plasmin-independent mechanism, and that uPA-induced formation of NCAD dimers protects the synapse and dendritic branches from the harmful effects of soluble Aβ oligomers. Our data indicate that Aβ-induced decrease in the abundance of synaptic uPA contributes to the development of synaptic dysfunction in the early stages of AD, and that uPA treatment is a potential strategy to prevent soluble Aβ-induced synaptic damage before the development of irreversible brain damage.

Materials and Methods

Animals, human tissue, and reagents

Animal strains were WT and uPAR-deficient (uPAR−/−) pregnant females, and 5-d-old and 6- to 7-month-old 5xFAD male mice [express human AβPP with the Swedish (KM670/671NL), Florida (I716V), and London (V717I) mutations, together with a mutant presenilin 1 (M146L, L286V) under the control of the murine Thy-1 promoter] (Buskila et al., 2013), and their WT littermate controls on a C57BL/6J background. Experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee of Emory University. Human samples of brains with AD and healthy controls (mean age: 75.3 ± 14.2 and 75.5 ± 14.8 years, respectively) were obtained from the Emory Alzheimer's Disease Center and Emory, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Neurosciences Core facility. Recombinant murine uPA, its amino terminal fragment (ATF; devoid of proteolytic activity), mouse anti-uPA antibody, and mouse uPA total antigen assay ELISA kit were purchased from Molecular Innovations. Other materials were Aβ 1-42 oligomers (rPeptide), the PERK inhibitor GSK 2606414, and BAPTA-AM (Tocris Bioscience), the N-cadherin inhibitor Exherin (ADH1; AdooQ Bioscience), phalloidin Alexa-488, the nuclear staining Hoechst, glycine, KCl, and mouse Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 ELISA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), AM1-44 and advasep-7 (Biotium), trypsin, glutamate, and bicuculline (Sigma Millipore), pepsin (GeneTex), the Apop Tag Plus Fluorescein In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (EMD Millipore), and antibodies against Aβ 1-42 (clone 6E10, BioLegend), rabbit PSD-95, rabbit eIF2α phosphorylated at serine 51 (peIF2α, Cell Signaling Technology), mouse PSD-95 and mouse bassoon (Enzon), rabbit N-cadherin (Abcam), mouse uPA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse uPAR (R&D Systems), rabbit uPA (Molecular Innovations), rabbit syntaxin I (STX-I; Millipore), microtubule-associated protein-2, and β-actin (Sigma Millipore). Secondary antibodies were IRDye 800CW donkey anti-goat, IRDye 800CW donkey anti-rabbit, IRDye 800CW donkey anti-mouse, IRDye 680RD donkey anti-mouse, and IRDye 680RD donkey anti-rabbit (LI-COR); and anti-rabbit Alexa-488, anti-mouse Alexa-488, anti-rabbit Alexa-594, and anti-mouse Alexa-594 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Neuronal and astrocytic cultures

Cerebral cortical neurons and astrocytes were cultured as described previously (Echeverry et al., 2010), from EXVIII 5xFAD and uPAR−/− mice (neurons), and 5-d-old 5xFAD mice (astrocytes), and from their WT littermate controls. Briefly, the cerebral cortex was dissected, transferred into Hanks balanced salt solution containing 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 10 mm HEPES, and incubated in trypsin containing 0.02% DNase at 37°C for 15 min. Tissue was triturated, and the supernatant was resuspended in GS21-supplemented neurobasal medium containing 2 mm l-glutamine and plated onto 0.1 mg/ml poly-L-lysine-coated wells. For astrocytes, the triturated tissue was resuspended in 10% FBS DMEM and filtered through a 70 μm pore membrane. Then cells were plated onto poly-l-lysine-coated T75 flasks. Astrocytes were plated and used for experiments on confluency.

Preparation of synaptoneurosomes and Triton-soluble and -insoluble fractions

Neuronal cultures or cerebral cortices were homogenized and centrifuged at 2000 × g for 5 min in fractionation buffer containing 1 mm EGTA, 0.25 M sucrose, and 25 mm HEPES, pH 8.1. Then, supernatants were centrifuged at 32,000 × g for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended and layered on top of a 5%-10% discontinuous Ficoll gradient (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and centrifuged at 50,000 × g for 20 min using a Beckman Optima TLX tabletop ultracentrifuge. Synaptoneurosomes were collected from the 5%-10% interface and centrifuged at 50,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. To isolate the Triton-soluble and -insoluble fractions, synaptoneurosomes were prepared from uPA- and vehicle (control)-treated cerebral cortices, as described above but without EGTA (n = 4 or 5), subjected to osmotic lysis in 10 mm HEPES and protease inhibitors, and centrifuged at 50,000 × g during 30 min. The pellet was resuspended in 0.5% Triton, homogenized, and centrifuged at 40,000 × g during 30 min. The pellet (Triton-insoluble fraction) and supernatant (Triton-soluble fraction) were mixed with 1% SDS prepared and loaded on a gel as described below.

Measurement of the release of neuronal uPA and the concentration of Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 in the cerebral cortex

WT cerebral cortical neurons plated on 24 wells were washed and incubated with 300 µl of fresh neurobasal medium containing 1 µl/ml DMSO, 200 μm glycine, and 20 μm bicuculline, followed by 1 min of treatment with either PBS or 10 μm glutamate. A subgroup of cells was preincubated during 30 min with 30 μm of BAPTA-AM before the addition of glutamate (n = 19 per condition). After 1 min of treatment, 100 µl of media was collected, and the concentration of uPA was measured with an ELISA kit following the manufacturer's instructions (Molecular Innovations). To quantify the concentration of Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 in the cerebral cortex, we used an ELISA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 100 mg of the frontal cortex of 5-d-old 5xFAD mice and their WT littermate controls (n = 3 per strain) were homogenized in 800 μl of 5 M guanidine-HCl/50 mm Tris, pH 8, mixed at room temperature for 3 h, diluted 10-fold with cold PBS plus a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Sigma Millipore), and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was diluted twice with a kit dilution buffer, and 100 µl of samples or standards was incubated for 2 h in the antibody-coated plate. Wells were then washed 4 times, and incubated with the kit detector antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Then, after the plate was washed and incubated with anti-IgG HRP for 30 min at room temperature, 100 µl of the kit chromogen buffer was added during 30 min. The absorbance was read at 450 nm. Protein concentration was measured for each sample (Pierce BCA Protein Assay, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and values were expressed as pg of Aβ1-40 or Aβ1-42/mg of protein.

Preparation of Aβ 1-42 oligomers

Aβ 1-42 oligomers were prepared as previously described (Fa et al., 2010). Briefly, 80 μm Aβ 1-42 monomers were lyophilized in 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol, resuspended in DMSO to a 5 mm concentration, and incubated in PBS overnight. Experiments were performed with doses to reach a final concentration of 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers.

Electrophysiology

To study the effect of uPA on Aβ-induced synaptic dysfunction, we performed patch-clamp recordings to examine sEPSCs on DIV14-DIV17 WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 24 h with Aβ oligomers, alone or in the presence of uPA (given in three doses of a 5 nm solution immediately after the addition of Aβ, and 12 and 23 h later). Coverslips containing cells were transferred to a recording chamber and perfused at 0.2 ml/min with a Ringer's solution (pH 7.4, 300 mOsm) containing the following (in mM): 145 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose. Individual neurons were visually identified under polarized illumination using an STP 6000 microscope (Leica Microsystems), and pyramidal neurons were chosen based on their soma shape and membrane properties. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed using a MultiClamp 700B amplifier, Digidata 1550 digitizer, and pClamp 10.6 software (Molecular Devices). Recording pipettes with a resistance of 4-6 MΩ were pulled from borosilicate glass using a Sutter P-97 electrode puller. The patch solution (pH 7.3, 285 mOsm) contained the following (in mM): 130 K-gluconate, 2 KCl, 10 HEPES, 3 MgCl2, 5 phosphocreatine, 2 K-ATP, and 0.2 NaGTP. Access resistances measured in voltage clamp were in the range of 15-30 MΩ. Whole-cell currents were filtered at 3 kHz and digitized at 10 kHz. Spontaneous Excitatory Postsynaptic Currents (sEPSCs) were recorded at holding potential of −60 mV. All sEPSCs were detected offline using the MiniAnalysis program 6.0 (Synaptosoft). We examined four neurons in each quadrant of each coverslip, for a total of 17-24 neurons from 5 different cultures. The investigator performing the patch-clamp recordings remained blind to the experimental conditions and their statistical analysis.

Western blot analyses

To study the expression of uPA, uPAR, and STX-I in the cerebral cortex, whole extracts were prepared from the frontal cortex of WT mice (n = 4), DIV16 WT cerebral cortical neurons (n = 4), 5-d-old astrocytes cultured from the cerebral cortex of 5xFAD mice and their WT littermate controls (n = 8), and the aorta and kidney dissected from 5xFAD mice (n =4) and their WT littermate controls (n =4). To study the expression of uPA in the synapse, synaptoneurosomes were prepared from the frontal cortex of 6-month-old (n = 4) and 5-d-old 5xFAD mice and their WT littermate controls (n = 4), DIV16 WT cerebral cortical neurons, and the frontal cortex of AD patients and healthy controls (n = 6 per group). To study the purity of the Aβ 1-42 oligomers used for our in vitro studies, 108 μg of Aβ 1-42 oligomers was left untreated or incubated with PBS overnight. To study the effect of Aβ on the expression of uPA, 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers was added during 0-24 h to DIV16 WT cerebral cortical neurons and WT astrocytes (n = 4). To determine whether eIF2α mediates the effect of Aβ on uPA expression, DIV16 WT cerebral cortical neurons were incubated 0, 1, or 24 h with 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers, alone or in combination with 1 μm of the PERK inhibitor GSK 2606414 (n = 5). To study the effect of uPA on NCAD expression and to determine whether it requires uPA's proteolytic activity, synaptoneurosomes were prepared from WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 30 min with vehicle control or 5 nm of either uPA or its ATF. To investigate the effect of uPA on trypsin-induced cleavage of NCAD monomers, whole-cell extracts were prepared from WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 30 min with vehicle (control) and 5 nm of either uPA or its ATF, and then treated 10 min with EDTA-free 0.006% trypsin (n = 6). To investigate the effect of uPA on the formation of NCAD dimers, Triton-soluble and -insoluble fractions were isolated from synaptoneurosomes prepared from the frontal cortex of WT mice treated during 30 min with 5 nm of uPA or vehicle (control; n = 5). To study the effect of Aβ on NCAD expression, whole-cell extracts were prepared from WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 24 h with 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers, alone or in the presence of three doses of 5 nm of either uPA or its ATF administered at the beginning of the experiment, and 12 and 23 h later (n = 4 per time point). Proteins were quantified with the BCA assay, and equal amounts were loaded and separated onto a 4%-15% SDS-gel, transferred into a nitrocellulose membrane, blocked with LI-COR blocking buffer, and incubated overnight at 4°C with antibodies against mouse uPA (1:1000), STX-I (1:2000), actin (1:50,000), rabbit N-cadherin (1:2000), goat uPAR (1:1000), rabbit peIF2α (1:1000), and Aβ 1-42 (1:1000). Then membranes were washed and incubated during 1 h with IRDye 800CW donkey anti-rabbit (1:10,000), IRDye 800CW donkey anti-goat (1:10,000), IRDye 800CW donkey anti-mouse (1:10,000), IRDye 680RD donkey anti-mouse (1:10,000), and IRDye 680RD donkey anti-rabbit antibodies (1:10,000). Membranes were developed using a LI-COR Odyssey Fc reader. Quantifications were performed using the Image Studio software. Values were expressed as a ratio of intensity of the band/actin intensity and normalized to each control.

Immunohistochemistry

To study the expression of uPA and NCAD in the cerebral cortex, 30 µm sections were obtained from the frontal cortex of 5xFAD mice (n = 6) and their WT littermate controls (n = 7), and from AD patients and healthy controls (n = 5). To study the effect of Aβ on uPA and uPAR expression, WT cerebral cortical neurons were incubated 24 h with 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 monomers, alone or in combination with 5 nm of uPA or its ATF, administered at the beginning of the experiment, and 12 and 23 h thereafter. To study the effect of uPA on the formation of synaptic contacts, DIV16 WT cerebral cortical neurons were incubated 30 min with vehicle (control) or 5 nm of uPA, alone or in combination with 175 μm of ADH1 (NCAD inhibitor). To study the effect of uPA on NCAD expression, murine WT and uPAR−/− cerebral cortical neurons were incubated with 5 nm of uPA or a comparable volume of vehicle (control). To study the effect of Aβ on NCAD expression, DIV14-DIV16 WT cerebral cortical neurons were incubated during 24 h with 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 monomers, alone or in combination with three doses of 5 nm of uPA administered at the beginning of the experiment and 12 and 23 h later. A subset of samples was treated with only one dose of uPA 24 h after the addition of Aβ. Brain slices were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton, blocked with 3% BSA in TBS during 1 h, and incubated overnight with antibodies against murine uPA (1:100), or N-cadherin (1:400). Samples were then washed and incubated with Hoechst (1:5000) and either anti-mouse Alexa-488 (1:500) or anti-rabbit Alexa-488 (1:500) secondary antibodies. Pictures were taken from the frontal cortex at a 40× magnification with an immunofluorescent microscope (Olympus IX83), and from each cortical layer at 283× magnification with a Fluoview FV10i automated confocal laser-scanning microscope (Olympus). Quantification of uPA- and NCAD-positive puncta was performed in confocal micrographs taken from individual cortical layers at 282× magnification. Values are given as percentage of the total number of uPA-positive puncta in the six cortical layers, or as a mean number of uPA/positive puncta/2025 µm2. Images were processed with ImageJ and the plugin puncta analyzer. Cells were fixed in 4% PFA 24 h after the addition of Aβ, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton, blocked with 3% BSA in TBS during 20 min, and incubated overnight with antibodies against either murine uPA (1:100), or murine uPAR (1:400), murine bassoon (1:100), STX-I (1:400), and rabbit PSD-95 (1:100). Then, cells were washed and incubated with Hoechst (1:5000) and a 1:500 dilution of the following secondary antibodies: anti-mouse Alexa-594, anti-rabbit Alexa-594, anti-goat Alexa-488, or anti-mouse Alexa-488. Confocal micrographs were taken at 60× and deconvoluted using 64 iterations of the CellSens dimension 1.17 software (Olympus). Quantifications were performed using the ImageJ and the plugin puncta analyzer.

Quantification of dendritic branches

To study the effect of uPA on the complexity of the dendritic tree, DIV14 WT cerebral cortical neurons were incubated with 175 μm of ADH1 or a comparable volume of vehicle (control) 30 min before the addition of 5 nm of uPA or vehicle (control). To study the effect of uPA on the harmful effect of Aβ on dendritic branches, DIV14 WT cerebral cortical neurons were incubated during 24 h with vehicle (control) or 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers, alone or in the presence of three doses of 5 nm of uPA added at the beginning of the experiment, and 12 and 23 h later, alone or in combination with 175 nm of ADH1 or vehicle (control). At 30 min after the addition of uPA for the first group of experiments, and 60 min after the last dose of uPA for the second set of experiments (24 h after the addition of Aβ), neurons were fixed with 4% PFA and incubated 15 min with 0.1% Triton and blocked during 30 min with BSA 3%, followed by staining with phalloidin-488 (1:1000) and anti-microtubule-associated protein-2 antibodies (1:2500). The number of dendritic intersections 0-70 µm away from the soma was quantified in pictures taken at 20× magnification using the Sholl analysis plugin of Image J.

Quantification of AM1-44 uptake

WT cerebral cortical neurons were incubated during 24 h with vehicle (control) or 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers, alone or in the presence of three doses of 5 nm of uPA added at the beginning of the experiment, and 12 and 23 h later. Twenty-four hours after the last dose of uPA, cells were incubated during 2 min with Tyrode's buffer containing 125 mm NaCl, 2 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 2 mm MgCl2, 25 mm HEPES, 30 mm D-glucose, 5 μm of AM1-44, and 45 mm of KCl. Cells were then washed; and 5 min later, 5 μm of ADVASEP-7 was added to reduce background and induce the release of membrane-bound AM1-44. Five minutes later, cells were treated with 45 nm of KCl to induce the release of AM1-44 incorporated into synaptic vesicles. Quantifications were made in images taken with an Olympus microscope IX83 and a DP80 camera at a 20× magnification.

Quantification of neuronal survival

The effect of Aβ on neuronal survival was studied by quantifying the uptake of propidium iodide and the number of TUNEL-positive cells in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 24 h with vehicle (control) or 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers. As a control, cell death was induced in a third group of cells with 50 μm of glutamate. Quantifications were automatically performed with the CellSens dimension 1.17 software (Olympus).

Quantitative PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted using a RNeasy mini kit from QIAGEN from WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 0, 1, and 24 h with 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers (n = 8) followed by cDNA synthesis with a RNAiScript cDNA Synthesis kit purchased from Bio-Rad. Then,uPA mRNA was quantified with a QuantStudio 3 thermocycler(Thermo Fisher Scientific) using TaqMan fast advanced master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in combination with Plau FAM-MGB (Mm00447054_m1, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or GAPDH FAM-MGB (Mm99999915_g1, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Values are expressed as mean values obtained from ΔΔCt using GAPDH as internal control.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t test and one- or two-way ANOVA with corrections, as deemed appropriate and described in each figure legend. p values of < 0.05 were considered as significant.

Results

uPA expression in the cerebral cortex

First, we used confocal microscopy to study the expression of uPA in the frontal cortex of the murine brain. We found that, although uPA-positive puncta are detected throughout the entire cortex, most of them are located in the II/III and V cortical layers (35.30 ± 8.34% and 27.65 ± 3.6% of the total number of uPA-positive puncta in the six cortical layers, respectively; Fig. 1A,B; n = 4 mice). These observations were replicated in the frontal cortex of the healthy human brain, in which most of uPA-positive puncta were also detected in the II/III and V cortical layers (26% ± 2.53% and 29 ± 1.5% of the total number of uPA-positive puncta in the six cortical layers; Fig. 1C,D; n = 4 brains). Furthermore, our studies with whole-brain extracts and synaptoneurosomes (assembled by the sealed axonal bouton and attached postsynaptic terminal) prepared from the frontal cortex of WT mice and DIV17 WT cerebral cortical neurons indicate that most of this uPA is localized in the synapse (Fig. 1E–H). Additionally, we found that 60 s of incubation with a combination of glutamate, bicuculline, and glycine [to increase synaptic activity without causing cell death (Jeanneret et al., 2018)] triggers its release via a calcium-dependent mechanism (Fig. 1I).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

uPA expression in the cerebral cortex. A-D, Representative confocal micrographs at 282× magnification of individual cortical layers from the murine (A) and human (C) frontal cortex immunostained with anti-uPA antibodies (green) and Hoechst (blue). B, D, The percentage of uPA-positive puncta in each cortical layer in relation to the total number of puncta in the six cortical layers (n = 20 pictures per layer from 4 mice and human brains). B, D, Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test. E-H, Representative Western blot analysis (E,G) and quantification of the normalized intensity of the band (F,H) of uPA expression in whole extracts and synaptoneurosomes prepared from either the frontal cortex (E,F) or WT cerebral cortical neurons (G,H). n = 4 observations per experimental group. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. I, Mean concentration of uPA in the culture medium of WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 60 s with vehicle (control), or a combination of 10 μm of glutamate, 20 μm bicuculline, and 200 μm glycine, alone or in the presence of 30 μm of BAPTA-AM. n = 19 observations per condition. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test.

Effect of AD on the synaptic expression of uPA and uPAR

Several studies have reported variations in uPA gene (Ozturk et al., 2007) and uPA protein (Whelan et al., 2019) in AD patients. Thus, we decided to use confocal microscopy to study its expression in brain sections obtained from the frontal cortex of AD patients and healthy controls (n = 4 brains per group). Our data indicate that, compared with controls, the expression of uPA is decreased in the II/III and V cortical layers of AD brains (Fig. 2A,B). Additionally, our studies with synaptoneurosomes show that the synaptic abundance of uPA is decreased in the frontal cortex of these patients (Fig. 2C,D). Importantly, probing of these membranes with antibodies against STX-I shows that equal amounts of synaptic extracts were loaded in both experimental groups (Fig. 2C,E). Remarkably, in contrast with the expression of uPA, we did not find a reduction in the abundance of its receptor (uPAR) in the synapse of AD brains (Fig. 2F,G).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Effect of AD on uPA and uPAR expression. A, B, Representative confocal micrographs at 282× magnification from sections taken from the II/III and V frontal cortical layers of a brain with AD (Ab, Ad) and a healthy control (Aa and Ac) and a brain with AD (Ab and Ad). B, The mean number of uPA-positive puncta in the II/III and V cortical layers in both experimental groups. n = 5 brains per group and 5 pictures per brain. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. C–G, Representative Western blot analyses (C, F) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (D, E, G) of uPA and STX-I (C–E) and uPAR (F, G) in synaptoneurosomes prepared from the frontal cortex of AD patients and healthy control brains. n = 6 brains per experimental condition. D, E, G, Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test.

We then performed similar observations in the frontal cortex of 6- to 7-month-old 5xFAD mice and their WT littermate controls. We found that, as observed in AD patients, the expression of uPA is decreased in the II/III and V cortical layers of 5XFAD mice (Fig. 3A,B). Moreover, studies with synaptoneurosomes revealed that the synaptic abundance of uPA (Fig. 3C–E), but not uPAR (Fig. 3F,G), is decreased in the frontal cortex of these animals. Importantly, the observed decrease in uPA expression in 5xFAD mice was specific to the brain, as it was not observed in their aorta (Fig. 3H,I) or kidneys (Fig. 3J,K). To determine whether this effect is cell-type-specific, we studied the expression of uPA in astrocytes prepared from the frontal cortex of 5-d-old 5xFAD mice and their WT littermate controls. To control for the young age of the animals used to prepare these cultures, we performed similar observations with synaptoneurosomes isolated from the frontal cortex of 5xFAD mice and their WT littermate controls of comparable age. We found that the expression of uPA is decreased in the synapse (Fig. 3L–N), but not in astrocytes (Fig. 3O,P), of 5xFAD mice. Importantly, some extracts prepared from 5XFAD astrocytes exhibited increased GFAP immunoreactivity compared with WT astrocytes, despite equal protein loading in both experimental groups (data not shown). Furthermore, our ELISA experiments indicate that, at that age, the concentrations of Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 are already increased in the cerebral cortex of these animals (Fig. 3Q).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

uPA and uPAR expression in 5xFAD mice. A, B, Representative confocal micrographs at 282× magnification from sections taken from the II/III and V cortical layers from the frontal cortex of 5xFAD mice (Ab, Ad) and their WT littermate controls (Aa, Ac). B, The mean number of uPA-positive puncta in the II/III and V cortical layers in both experimental groups. n = 7 brains per group and 5 pictures per brain. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. C–G, Representative Western blot analyses (C, F) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band of uPA (D), STX-I (E), and uPAR (G) expression in synaptoneurosomes prepared from the frontal cortex of 6-month-old 5xFAD mice and their WT littermate controls. n = 4 animals per experimental conditions. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. H–K, Representative Western blot analyses (H, J) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (I, K) of uPA expression in the aorta (H, I) and kidneys (J, K) of 5xFAD mice and their WT littermate controls. n per experimental condition: I, 4 mice; K, 6 mice. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. L–P, Representative Western blot analyses (L, O) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (M, N, P) of uPA, STX-I, GFAP, and actin expression in extracts from synaptoneurosomes and astrocytes prepared from the frontal cortex of 5-d-old 5XFAD mice and their WT littermate controls. M, N, n = 4. P, n = 8. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. Q, Mean concentration of Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 in the frontal cortex of 5-d-old 5XFAD mice and their WT littermate controls. n = 6 samples from 3 different brains per experimental group. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test.

Effect of Aβ on uPA and uPAR expression

First, we quantified cell death in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated with soluble Aβ 1-42 oligomers prepared as described in Materials and Methods (Fig. 4A). Our propidium iodide (Fig. 4B) intake and TUNEL assays (Fig. 4C) indicate that 24 h of incubation with 100 nm of soluble Aβ 1-42 oligomers does not induce cell death. Thus, we used this experimental design to study the effect of Aβ on uPA and uPAR expression in cerebral cortical neurons. We found that Aβ decreases the expression of uPA (Fig. 4D–G), but not uPAR (Fig. 4H-K), in WT cerebral cortical neurons. Importantly, this effect is neuron-specific, as it was not detected in WT astrocytes incubated with Aβ (Fig. 4L,M). Furthermore, our data indicate that Aβ inhibits the translation of uPA mRNA in cerebral cortical neurons, as it decreases the expression of uPA protein (Fig. 5A,B), but not uPA mRNA (Fig. 5C). Because peIF2α inhibits mRNA translation in neurons of AD patients (Chang et al., 2002; Hoozemans et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2013), we decided to investigate whether peIF2α mediates the effect of Aβ on uPA expression. We found that Aβ increases the abundance of peIF2α in cerebral cortical neurons (Fig. 5D,E) and that inhibition of PERK-induced eIF2α phosphorylation with GSK 2606414 (Fig. 5F,G) effectively abolishes the deleterious effect of Aβ on uPA expression (Fig. 5H,I).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Effect of Aβ on uPA expression. A, Representative Western blot analysis of Aβ 1-42 oligomers prepared as described in Materials and Methods and either left untreated (lane 1, monomers) or incubated overnight with PBS (lane 2, oligomers). B, Mean propidium iodide (PPI) intake by WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 24 h with vehicle (control) or 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers, or 1 h with 50 μm of glutamate. Each point represents the average number of PPI-positive neurons per picture from neurons from three different cultures [n = 12 pictures/444 cells (control), 12 pictures/465 cells (Aβ- treated neurons) and 15 pictures/430 cells (glutamate-treated neurons)]. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test. C, Mean percentage of TUNEL-positive cells in WT cerebral cortical neurons exposed to the experimental conditions described in B. Each point represents the average number of TUNEL-positive cells per culture (4 different cultures). n = 16,713 cells (control), 10,854 cells (Aβ- treated neurons), and 13,167 cells (glutamate-treated neurons). Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test. D, E, Representative confocal micrographs at 60× magnification of WT cerebral cortical neurons stained with Hoechst (blue) and antibodies against uPA (green) and phalloidin (red) after 24 h of incubation with 100 nm of Aβ 1–42 oligomers or vehicle-control. Bottom panels, A 4× electronic magnification of the area denoted by the dashed square in Da and Db. C, The mean number of uPA-positive puncta/50 µm. n = 48 extensions per experimental group. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. F, G, Representative Western blot analysis (F) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (G) of uPA expression in synaptoneurosomes prepared from WT cerebral cortical neurons treated during 24 h with Aβ 1-42 oligomers or vehicle (control). n = 5 per experimental group. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. H, I, Representative confocal micrographs at 100× magnification of extensions of WT cerebral cortical neurons immunostained with phalloidin and antibodies against uPAR (green) after 24 h of incubation with Aβ or vehicle (control). I, The mean number of uPA-positive puncta/50 µm in 60 extensions of WT neurons exposed to the experimental conditions described in H. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. J–M, Representative Western blot analyses (J, L) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (K, M) of uPAR (J, K) and uPA and GFAP (L, M) expression in WT cerebral cortical neurons(J, K) and astrocytes (L, M) incubated 24 h with Aβ or vehicle (control).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Effect of Aβ on uPA mRNA translation. A, B, Representative Western blot analyses (A) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (B) of uPA expression in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 0–24 h with 100 nm of Aβ 1–42 oligomers. n = 4 per time point. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. C, qRT-PCR analysis of uPA mRNA expression in WT cerebral cortical neurons exposed to the experimental conditions described in A and D. n = 6–8 per time point. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. D, E, Representative Western blot analysis (D) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (E) of peIF2α in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 60 min with 100 nm of Aβ 1–42 oligomers or vehicle (control). n = 6 per experimental condition. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. F, G, Representative Western blot analysis (F) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (G) of peIF2α in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 60 min with vehicle (control) or 100 nm of Aβ 1–42 oligomers, alone or in the presence of 1 μm of the PERK inhibitor GSK 2606414 (GSK). n = 4 per experimental condition. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test. H, I, Representative Western blot analysis (H) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (I) of uPA expression in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 24 h with 100 nm of Aβ 1–42 oligomers, alone or in the presence of 1 μm of the PERK inhibitor GSK 2606414 (GSK). n = 8 per experimental condition. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons test.

uPA protects the synapse from the harmful effects of Aβ

Several lines of experimental evidence indicate that Aβ has a deleterious effect on the synapse (Lue et al., 1999; Fitzjohn et al., 2001; Selkoe, 2002). Because our previous studies show that uPA protects the synapse from different forms of injury (Merino et al., 2017; Diaz et al., 2017, 2019), we then studied whether uPA also protects the synapse from the harmful effects of Aβ. Since Aβ oligomers have a deleterious effect on the presynaptic release of neurotransmitters (He et al., 2019), first we studied the activity-dependent uptake of the fluorescent nerve terminal probe AM1-44 by presynaptic vesicles of WT cerebral cortical neurons depolarized with 50 μm of KCl after 24 h of incubation with 100 nm of soluble Aβ 1-42 oligomers or vehicle (control), alone or in the presence of 5 nm of uPA. Our studies reveal that Aβ has a harmful effect on presynaptic function (denoted by a decrease in the uptake of AM1-44) that is attenuated by uPA treatment (Fig. 6A,B). We then used the same experimental design and confocal microscopy to quantify the number of bassoon/PSD-95-positive puncta (denotes synapses with intact presynaptic and postsynaptic terminals) in extensions of WT neurons incubated with Aβ in the presence of 5 nm of uPA or its ATF (devoid of proteolytic activity). We found that Aβ decreases the number of bassoon/PSD-95-positive puncta, and that this effect is attenuated by uPA (Fig. 6C,D) via a mechanism that does not require plasmin generation (Fig. 6E,F). Importantly, Aβ does not decrease the abundance of STX-I (Fig. 6G), indicating that, despite affecting the molecular composition of axonal boutons and dendritic spines, it does not alter the structural integrity of the presynaptic membrane. To further study the functional significance of these findings, we quantified the amplitude and frequency of sEPSCs in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 24 h with vehicle (control) or Aβ, alone or in the presence of uPA. Our data indicate that, compared with controls, Aβ causes a 35.4 ± 3.8% and 32.78 ± 6.8% decrease in the amplitude (p = 0.04) and frequency (p = 0.03) of EPSCs, respectively, and that this effect is abrogated by treatment with uPA (p < 0.05, compared with cells treated with Aβ alone; Fig. 6E–J).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

uPA protects the synapse from the harmful effects of Aβ. A, B, WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 24 h with 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers, alone or in combination with 5 nm of uPA, or with vehicle (control), were treated with a combination of 5 μm of AM1-44 and 45 mm of KCl. Cells were then washed and treated 5 min later with 5 μm of ADVASEP-7 to reduce background and induce the release of membrane-bound AM1-44. Fluorescence intensity at this point corresponds to AM1-44 loaded into presynaptic vesicles (depicted with an arrow). Five minutes later, cells were treated with 45 nm of KCl to induce the release of AM1-44 incorporated into synaptic vesicles. B, Values indicate fluorescence intensity before second dose of KCl (AM1-44 loaded into synaptic vesicles). Each experiment was repeated six times for a total of 30 observations per experimental condition. A, p < 0.05 when Aβ-treated cells are compared with Aβ/uPA- (*) and vehicle (control)-treated (^) neurons. A, B, Statistical analysis: two-way (A) and one-way (B) ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. C–F, Representative confocal micrographs of WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 24 h with Aβ, alone or in the presence of either uPA (C) or its ATF (E) an immunostained with Hoechst and antibodies against bassoon (green) and PSD-95 (red). Bottom panels, The 4× magnification of the area depicted by the dashed squares. D, F, The mean number of bassoon/PSD-95-positive puncta in neuronal extension of WT neurons exposed to the experimental conditions described in C and E, respectively. D, n = 56. F, n = 40. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. G, Mean number of STX-I-positive puncta in extensions of WT neurons incubated 24 h with 100 nm of Aβ 1–42 oligomers or a comparable volume of vehicle (control). n = 40. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. H, Representative recordings of sEPSCs in WT cerebral cortical incubated during 24 h with vehicle (control) or Aβ, alone or in combination with uPA. I, J, Mean amplitude (I) and frequency (J) of sEPSCs in WT cerebral cortical neurons exposed to the experimental conditions described in H. n = 23 (control cells), 24 (cells treated with Aβ alone), and 18 (cells treated with Aβ in the presence of uPA). Results are presented as percentage of amplitude and frequency in relation to control cells. Each observation was repeated with cells from 5 different cultures. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test.

uPA regulates the synaptic expression and function of NCAD in cerebral cortical neurons

Our data indicate that Aβ decreases the synaptic abundance of bassoon and PSD-95, and that this harmful effect is attenuated by uPA. Because NCAD modulates the synaptic expression of bassoon and PSD-95 (Pielarski et al., 2013; Nikitczuk et al., 2014), we then investigated whether uPA has an effect on the synaptic expression and function of NCAD. Our studies with synaptoneurosomes and neuronal cultures prepared from WT and uPAR−/− cerebral cortical neurons treated during 30 min with 5 nm of uPA or a comparable volume of vehicle (control) indicate that uPA increases the abundance of NCAD in the synapse (Fig. 7A,B), and that, although this effect does not require plasmin generation (Fig. 7C,D), it is mediated by its binding to uPAR (Fig. 7E,F).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

uPA regulates the expression and function of NCAD in the synapse. A–D, Representative Western blot analyses (A, C) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (B, D) of NCAD expression in synaptoneurosomes (SYN) prepared from WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 30 min with vehicle (control) or 5 nm of either uPA (A, B) or its ATF (C, D). n = 4. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. E, Representative confocal micrographs at 240× magnification of WT and uPAR−/− neurons immunostained with anti-NCAD (green) and -bassoon (red) antibodies after 30 min of uPA treatment. F, Mean number of NCAD/bassoon-positive puncta in extensions from WT (n = 31) and uPAR−/− (n = 36) neurons treated as described in C. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. G–J, Representative Western blot analyses (G, I) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (H, J) of NCAD expression in WT neurons incubated during 30 min with 5 nm of either uPA (G, H) or its ATF (I, J) followed by 10 min of treatment with 0.006% trypsin. n = 6 per condition. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. K–M, Representative Western blot analysis (K) and normalized intensity of the band (L, M) of NCAD monomers (K, L) and dimer expression (black arrow in K; quantification in M) in the soluble (Sol.) and insoluble (Ins.) fractions of extracts prepared from the cerebral cortex of WT mice following treatment with uPA. n = 4 per condition. Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. N, O, Representative Sholl analyses (N) and mean number of dendritic intersections 0-70 μm from the neuronal soma (O) in WT cerebral cortical neurons treated with either vehicle (control), or 5 nm of uPA, or 175 μm of the NCAD inhibitor ADH1, or a combination of uPA and ADH1. *p < 0.05 compared with neurons treated with vehicle (control). ^p < 0.05 compared with neurons treated with uPA and ADH1. n = 90 cells/per condition. Lines indicate SEM. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparison test. P, Q, Representative confocal micrographs (240×) of extensions of WT neurons immunostained with antibodies against bassoon (red) and-PSD-95 (green) after 30 min of treatment with uPA or vehicle (control), alone or in the presence of the NCAD inhibitor ADH1. Q, The mean number of bassoon/PSD-95-positive puncta in 64-93 extensions from neurons exposed to the experimental conditions described in P. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak's comparisons test.

We then investigated whether uPA also induces the development of homophilic interactions between NCAD monomers, which is required for the formation of dendritic branches and synaptic contacts. Because the establishment of these interactions makes NCAD resistant to trypsin (Tanaka et al., 2000), we studied the expression of NCAD in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 30 min with vehicle (control) or 5 nm of either uPA or its ATF, followed by treatment during 10 min with 0.006% trypsin. Our data indicate that uPA induces the formation of homophilic interactions between NCAD monomers, as denoted by attenuation of the proteolytic effect of trypsin in uPA-treated neurons (Fig. 7G,H), and that this effect does not require uPA's proteolytic activity (Fig. 7I,J). To ensure that the formation of these homophilic interaction leads to the development of NCAD dimers in the brain, the cerebral cortex of WT mice was treated during 30 min with 5 nm of uPA or a comparable volume of vehicle (control). Then synaptoneurosomes were prepared from both experimental groups, and Triton-insoluble and -soluble fractions were immunoblotted with anti-NCAD antibodies. We not only confirmed our original observation that uPA increases the abundance of NCAD monomers in the synapse (Fig. 7K,L) but also found that it induces the formation of NCAD dimers (apparent as a 230 kDa band in the Triton-insoluble but not -soluble fraction; Fig. 7K,M). Because the generation of NCAD dimers triggers the formation of dendritic branches and modulates the expression of bassoon and PSD-95 in the synapse (Zhai et al., 2001; Togashi et al., 2002; Mendez et al., 2010), we quantified the number of dendritic branches and bassoon/PSD-95-positive puncta in extensions from WT cerebral cortical neurons treated with uPA, alone or in the presence of 175 μm of the NCAD inhibitor ADH1 (prevents the formation of NCAD dimers). We found that uPA induces the formation of dendritic branches (Fig. 7N,O) and bassoon/PSD-95-expressing synaptic contacts (Fig. 7P,Q), and that both effects are mediated by the generation of NCAD dimers, as they are abrogated by ADH1.

UPA-induced formation of NCAD dimers protects the synapse and dendritic branches from the harmful effectsof Aβ

Our confocal microscopy studies show that the expression of NCAD is decreased in the II/III layers of the frontal cortex of AD patients (Fig. 8A,B) and 6-month-old 5xFAD mice (Fig. 8C,D). We then decided to study the expression of NCAD in WT cerebral cortical neurons after 24 h of incubation with 100 nm of Aβ 1-42 oligomers, in the presence of 5 nm of uPA or its ATF, or a comparable volume of vehicle (control). A subset of neurons was treated with a combination of uPA and 4 μg/ml of anti-uPAR blocking antibodies. These experiments revealed that Aβ decreases the expression of NCAD, and that this effect is abrogated by uPA (Fig. 8E,F) via a uPAR-mediated mechanism (Fig. 8G,H) that does not require plasmin generation (Fig. 8I,J). More importantly, we found that the harmful effect of Aβ on the number of dendritic branches (Fig. 8K,L) and intact synaptic contacts (Fig. 8M,N) is attenuated by uPA, and that this protective effect is mediated by the formation of NCAD dimers as it was abrogated by cotreatment with ADH1.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

uPA-induced formation of NCAD dimers protects against Aβ-induced damage of dendritic branches and synapses. A-D, Representative confocal micrographs at 282× magnification of the II/III cortical layers of the frontal cortex of the brain of AD patients or healthy controls (A), or 5xFAD mice and their WT littermate controls (C), immunostained with Hoechst (blue) and antibodies against NCAD (green). B, D, The mean number of NCAD-positive puncta/2025 μm2 in each experimental group. n = 5 brains and 5 micrographs per brain in B, and 4 brains and 5 micrographs per brain in D. B, D, Statistical analysis: two-tailed Student's t test. E, F, Representative Western blot analysis (E) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (F) of NCAD expression in extracts from WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 24 h with vehicle (control) or Aβ 1-42 oligomers, alone or in the presence of 5 nm of uPA or vehicle (control). n = 4 per experimental condition. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. G, H, Representative confocal micrographs (240×) of extensions of WT neurons immunostained with antibodies against bassoon (green) and-PSD-95 (red) after 24 h of incubation with Aβ, alone or in the presence of 5 nm of uPA, alone or in combination with 4 μg/ml of anti-uPAR antibodies or an IgG isotype (control). H, The mean number of bassoon/PSD-95-positive puncta in 60 extensions from neurons exposed to the experimental conditions described in G. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. I, J, Representative Western blot analysis (I) and quantification of the mean intensity of the band (J) of NCAD expression in extracts from WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated during 24 h with vehicle (control) or Aβ 1-42 oligomers, alone or in the presence of 5 nm of uPA's AFT. n = 4 per experimental condition. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. K, L, Representative Sholl analyses (K) and mean number of dendritic intersections 0-70 μm from the neuronal soma (L) in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated 24 h with 100 nm of soluble Aβ 1-42 oligomers, alone or in the presence of 5 nm of uPA, alone or in combination with 175 μm of the NCAD inhibitor ADH1. n = 45 cells examined per experimental group. p < 0.05 when controls are compared with neurons treated with Aβ (*) or Aβ + uPA (**); or when cells treated with Aβ are compared with cells treated with Aβ + uPA (^); or when cells treated with Aβ + uPA are compared with cells treated with Aβ + uPA + ADH1 (#). Lines indicate SEM. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test. M, N, Representative confocal micrographs (240×) of extensions of WT neurons immunostained with antibodies against bassoon (green) and-PSD-95 (red) after 24 h of incubation with Aβ, alone or in the presence of 5 nm of uPA, or with a combination of Aβ, uPA, and ADH1. N, The mean number of bassoon/PSD-95-positive puncta in 44 extensions from neurons exposed to the experimental conditions described in M. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test.

Discussion

The cerebral cortex has six layers with more or less well-differentiated populations of cells (DeFelipe et al., 2006). Hence, while layers I and IV contain mostly neuropil (layer I) and stellate neurons (layer IV) with locally ramifying axons, layers II/III and V harbor pyramidal neurons that establish excitatory connections with other areas of the brain (DeFelipe et al., 2006). Our confocal microscopy studies show that uPA is abundantly found in the II/III and V cortical layers of the frontal cortex, and that this expression pattern is similar in the murine and human brain. Furthermore, we show that glutamate, at concentrations that increase synaptic activity and induce neuronal plasticity, promotes its release via a calcium-dependent mechanism. Importantly, although astrocytes (Diaz et al., 2019) and endothelial cells (Prager et al., 2004) also express uPA, our studies with synaptoneurosomes indicate that, in the cerebral cortex and cultured cerebral cortical neurons, most of uPA is found in the synapse. However, it is important to note that we also detected a less intense band of immunoreactivity to anti-uPA antibodies in whole-brain extracts that may correspond to uPA in glia, endothelial cells, and the shaft of neuronal extensions.

The PA system plays a role in the pathogenesis of AD (Barker et al., 2010). However, most of the studies published to this date have focused on the effect of a dysfunctional tPA-plasminogen-plasmin cascade on plasmin-mediated cleavage of Aβ plaques in advanced stages of the disease (Tucker et al., 2000; Melchor et al., 2003). In contrast, the role of uPA in the pathophysiology of AD remains unknown. Our work indicates that the abundance of uPA, but not uPAR, is decreased in the synapse of neurons located in the II/III and V layers of the frontal cortex of patients with AD and 5xFAD mice. Furthermore, we show that this effect is specific to neurons as it is not observed in astrocytes, or in other organs, such as aorta and kidneys. Noticeably, we detected increased GFAP immunoreactivity in some extracts from 5xFAD astrocytes, which agrees with the reported increase in astrocytic activation in 5xFAD mice (Sompol et al., 2017). Independently of these considerations, our observations agree with a reported decrease in the abundance of uPA in the plasma of patients with early stages of AD (Whelan et al., 2019). We found that the synaptic expression of uPA is already decreased in the early stages of the disease, when Aβ levels in the cerebral cortex are increased but Aβ deposits are absent. These results are in line with our observations that soluble Aβ oligomers decrease the synaptic abundance of uPA, but not uPAR, and that this effect is unique to neurons, as in our experimental paradigm Aβ failed to decrease the expression of uPA in astrocytes.

The unfolded protein response is crucial for cellular homeostasis through transcriptional regulation of proteostasis pathways in the endoplasmic reticulum via three stress-responsive transmembrane proteins: PERK, inositol requiring element 1, and activating transcription factor 6 (Genereux et al., 2015). PERK induces the phosphorylation of eIF2α (Marciniak et al., 2006), which in turn produces a general translational halt. The unfolded protein response is upregulated in the brain of AD patients before the formation of plaques and tangles (Hoozemans et al., 2009), and several lines of evidence indicate that peIF2α shuts down mRNA translation in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases (Chang et al., 2002), and that this effect is associated with synaptic dysfunction and memory deficits (Ma et al., 2013). Our data show that Aβ increases the abundance of peIF2α, and that inhibition of PERK abrogates the harmful effect of Aβ on the expression of uPA protein. Significantly, PERK and eIF2α are also found in astrocytes (Guthrie et al., 2016), so Aβ should interact with an as yet unknown synaptic site or protein unique to neurons to inhibit the translation of uPA mRNA in these cells but not in astrocytes. More importantly, our results unveil a new modulatory role of uPA on the unfolded protein response in neurons, with translational implications for the treatment of patients with AD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Synaptic dysfunction is an early event in AD (Selkoe, 2002) that precedes the deposition of Aβ (Hsia et al., 1999) and correlates with the development of cognitive symptoms better than the number of plaques and tangles (Terry et al., 1991). Indeed, the accumulation and deposition of Aβ in the brain are not sufficient to cause cognitive symptoms (Price and Morris, 1999; Aizenstein et al., 2008), and multiple studies have shown that soluble Aβ is more toxic than the aggregate forms (Jin et al., 2011). Accordingly, several lines of experimental work have shown that soluble Aβ oligomers have a harmful effect on the synapse (Fitzjohn et al., 2001; Selkoe, 2002; Lacor et al., 2007), and that cortical levels of soluble Aβ correlate with synaptic dysfunction (Lue et al., 1999) and loss of synaptic proteins, such as bassoon and PSD-95 (Almeida et al., 2005). Our data indicate that Aβ impairs synaptic function and that this effect is abrogated by treatment with uPA. In contrast, in our experimental paradigm, Aβ did not alter the structural integrity of the presynaptic membrane, as denoted by unchanged levels of STX-I in Aβ-treated neurons. These observations are in line with reports indicating that Aβ has a negative effect on the molecular composition of the synapse without causing structural damage to the axonal bouton and postsynaptic terminal (Chapman et al., 1999). Our observations are novel for four reasons: (1) this is the first report that neuronal uPA protects the synapse from the harmful effect of Aβ; (2) it indicates that this protective role is mediated by uPAR and independent of uPA's ability to cleave plasminogen into plasmin; (3) it shows that Aβ does not have an effect on the abundance of uPAR, thus opening the possibility of using recombinant uPA to reverse the harmful effects of Aβ on the synapse; and (4) it indicates that uPA plays a crucial role in the early stages of the disease.

Cadherins are a family of proteins that mediate the formation of adherent contacts between apposing membranes (Geiger and Ayalon, 1992). A link between cadherins and uPA has been proposed in various experimental systems. Accordingly, some studies have shown that E-cadherin increases the expression of uPA in different cell lines and tumors (Frixen and Nagamine, 1993; Sasaki et al., 1999; Hiendlmeyer et al., 2004; Kleiner et al., 2007), and others have reported that E-cadherin mediates the ability of uPA to promote the dissemination of malignant cells (Munshi et al., 2002). We found that uPA increases the abundance of NCAD in the synapse and induces the development of NCAD dimers in the cerebral cortex, and that this leads to the formation of dendritic branches and bassoon/PSD-95-containing synaptic contacts. Furthermore, we found that the expression of NCAD is decreased in the cerebral cortex of AD patients and 5xFAD mice, and in WT cerebral cortical neurons incubated with Aβ. These observations agree with reports indicating that Aβ decreases the expression of NCAD in the synapse of the frontal cortex of AD patients (Ando et al., 2011). More importantly, our results indicate that uPA treatment abrogates the harmful effect of Aβ on NCAD expression, and that uPA-induced formation of NCAD dimers protects the synapse and dendritic branches from the deleterious effect of soluble Aβ.

Synaptic activity (Kamenetz et al., 2003) and sublethal NMDAR activation (Lesne et al., 2005) induce the release of Aβ and increase its levels in the interstitial space (Cirrito et al., 2005). Because our data show that glutamate, at doses that increase synaptic activity without inducing cell death, also induces the release of neuronal uPA, then we propose a model in which synaptic activity induces the release of both Aβ and uPA. In the early stages of this process, uPA counteracts the toxic effect of Aβ by increasing the abundance of NCAD in the synapse. However, this homeostatic effect is lost when high concentrations of Aβ halt the translation of uPA mRNA by inducing PERK-mediated phosphorylation of eIF2α. We acknowledge that the PERK inhibitor used in our studies may have unknown unintended off site effects. However, our demonstration that it effectively inhibits Aβ-induced eIF2α phosphorylation supports our hypothesis that Aβ has a negative effect on uPA expression via PERK-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation. Significantly, Aβ decreases NCAD, but not uPAR expression in the synapse. Thus, by triggering the formation of NCAD dimers, binding of recombinant uPA to endogenous uPAR is capable to rescue synapses and dendritic branches from the harmful effects of Aβ. This is a novel role for uPA with important implications for the understanding of the pathophysiological events that cause early synaptic dysfunction in AD, and for the development of potential therapeutic strategies to protect the synapse before the progression to irreversible brain damage.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant NS-NS091201 to M.Y. and Grant K08-NS099474-01 to S.R., Veterans Administration Merit Award IO1BX003441 to M.Y., and American Heart Association Post-Doctoral Fellowship Grant 19POST34380009 to A.D.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Manuel Yepes at myepes{at}emory.edu

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aizenstein HJ,
    2. Nebes RD,
    3. Saxton JA,
    4. Price JC,
    5. Mathis CA,
    6. Tsopelas ND,
    7. Ziolko SK,
    8. James JA,
    9. Snitz BE,
    10. Houck PR,
    11. Bi W,
    12. Cohen AD,
    13. Lopresti BJ,
    14. DeKosky ST,
    15. Halligan EM,
    16. Klunk WE
    (2008) Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly. Arch Neurol 65:1509–1517. doi:10.1001/archneur.65.11.1509 pmid:19001171
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Almeida CG,
    2. Tampellini D,
    3. Takahashi RH,
    4. Greengard P,
    5. Lin MT,
    6. Snyder EM,
    7. Gouras GK
    (2005) Beta-amyloid accumulation in APP mutant neurons reduces PSD-95 and GluR1 in synapses. Neurobiol Dis 20:187–198. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2005.02.008 pmid:16242627
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ando K,
    2. Uemura K,
    3. Kuzuya A,
    4. Maesako M,
    5. Asada-Utsugi M,
    6. Kubota M,
    7. Aoyagi N,
    8. Yoshioka K,
    9. Okawa K,
    10. Inoue H,
    11. Kawamata J,
    12. Shimohama S,
    13. Arai T,
    14. Takahashi R,
    15. Kinoshita A
    (2011) N-cadherin regulates p38 MAPK signaling via association with JNK-associated leucine zipper protein: implications for neurodegeneration in Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem 286:7619–7628. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.158477 pmid:21177868
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Asada-Utsugi M,
    2. Uemura K,
    3. Noda Y,
    4. Kuzuya A,
    5. Maesako M,
    6. Ando K,
    7. Kubota M,
    8. Watanabe K,
    9. Takahashi M,
    10. Kihara T,
    11. Shimohama S,
    12. Takahashi R,
    13. Berezovska O,
    14. Kinoshita A
    (2011) N-cadherin enhances APP dimerization at the extracellular domain and modulates Abeta production. J Neurochem 119:354–363. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07364.x pmid:21699541
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Barker R,
    2. Love S,
    3. Kehoe PG
    (2010) Plasminogen and plasmin in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res 1355:7–15. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.025 pmid:20709033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Benson DL,
    2. Tanaka H
    (1998) N-cadherin redistribution during synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 18:6892–6904. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-17-06892.1998
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Buskila Y,
    2. Crowe SE,
    3. Ellis-Davies GC
    (2013) Synaptic deficits in layer 5 neurons precede overt structural decay in 5xFAD mice. Neuroscience 254:152–159. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.09.016 pmid:24055684
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Chang RC,
    2. Wong AK,
    3. Ng HK,
    4. Hugon J
    (2002) Phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor-2alpha (eIF2alpha) is associated with neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroreport 13:2429–2432. doi:10.1097/00001756-200212200-00011 pmid:12499843
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chapman PF,
    2. White GL,
    3. Jones MW,
    4. Cooper-Blacketer D,
    5. Marshall VJ,
    6. Irizarry M,
    7. Younkin L,
    8. Good MA,
    9. Bliss TV,
    10. Hyman BT,
    11. Younkin SG,
    12. Hsiao KK
    (1999) Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. Nat Neurosci 2:271–276. doi:10.1038/6374 pmid:10195221
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cirrito JR,
    2. Yamada KA,
    3. Finn MB,
    4. Sloviter RS,
    5. Bales KR,
    6. May PC,
    7. Schoepp DD,
    8. Paul SM,
    9. Mennerick S,
    10. Holtzman DM
    (2005) Synaptic activity regulates interstitial fluid amyloid-beta levels in vivo. Neuron 48:913–922. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.028 pmid:16364896
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Collen D
    (1999) The plasminogen (fibrinolytic) system. Thromb Haemost 82:259–270. pmid:10605712
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Davies CA,
    2. Mann DM,
    3. Sumpter PQ,
    4. Yates PO
    (1987) A quantitative morphometric analysis of the neuronal and synaptic content of the frontal and temporal cortex in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Sci 78:151–164. doi:10.1016/0022-510X(87)90057-8 pmid:3572454
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Davis J,
    2. Wagner MR,
    3. Zhang W,
    4. Xu F,
    5. Van Nostrand WE
    (2003) Amyloid beta-protein stimulates the expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) in human cerebrovascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 278:19054–19061. doi:10.1074/jbc.M301398200 pmid:12754271
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. DeFelipe J,
    2. Ballesteros-Yáñez I,
    3. Inda MC,
    4. Muñoz A
    (2006) Double-bouquet cells in the monkey and human cerebral cortex with special reference to areas 17 and 18. Prog Brain Res 154:15–32. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54002-6 pmid:17010701
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. DeKosky ST,
    2. Scheff SW
    (1990) Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: correlation with cognitive severity. Ann Neurol 27:457–464. doi:10.1002/ana.410270502 pmid:2360787
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Diaz A,
    2. Merino P,
    3. Manrique LG,
    4. Ospina JP,
    5. Cheng L,
    6. Wu F,
    7. Jeanneret V,
    8. Yepes M
    (2017) A cross-talk between neuronal urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and astrocytic uPA receptor (uPAR) promotes astrocytic activation and synaptic recovery in the ischemic brain. J Neurosci 37:10310–10322. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1630-17.2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Diaz A,
    2. Merino P,
    3. Manrique LG,
    4. Cheng L,
    5. Yepes M
    (2019) Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) protects the tripartite synapse in the ischemic brain via ezrin-mediated formation of peripheral astrocytic processes. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 39:2157–2171.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Echeverry R,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Haile WB,
    4. Guzman J,
    5. Yepes M
    (2010) Tissue-type plasminogen activator is a neuroprotectant in the mouse hippocampus. J Clin Invest 120:2194–2205. doi:10.1172/JCI41722 pmid:20440070
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Fa M,
    2. Orozco IJ,
    3. Francis YI,
    4. Saeed F,
    5. Gong Y,
    6. Arancio O
    (2010) Preparation of oligomeric beta-amyloid 1-42 and induction of synaptic plasticity impairment on hippocampal slices. J Vis Exp 41:1884. doi:10.3791/1884
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Fitzjohn SM,
    2. Morton RA,
    3. Kuenzi F,
    4. Rosahl TW,
    5. Shearman M,
    6. Lewis H,
    7. Smith D,
    8. Reynolds DS,
    9. Davies CH,
    10. Collingridge GL,
    11. Seabrook GR
    (2001) Age-related impairment of synaptic transmission but normal long-term potentiation in transgenic mice that overexpress the human APP695SWE mutant form of amyloid precursor protein. J Neurosci 21:4691–4698. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-13-04691.2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Frixen UH,
    2. Nagamine Y
    (1993) Stimulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator expression by blockage of E-cadherin-dependent cell-cell adhesion. Cancer Res 53:3618–3623. pmid:8339268
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Geiger B,
    2. Ayalon O
    (1992) Cadherins. Annu Rev Cell Biol 8:307–332. doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.001515 pmid:1476802
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Genereux JC,
    2. Qu S,
    3. Zhou M,
    4. Ryno LM,
    5. Wang S,
    6. Shoulders MD,
    7. Kaufman RJ,
    8. Lasmezas CI,
    9. Kelly JW,
    10. Wiseman RL
    (2015) Unfolded protein response-induced ERdj3 secretion links ER stress to extracellular proteostasis. EMBO J 34:4–19. doi:10.15252/embj.201488896 pmid:25361606
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Guthrie LN,
    2. Abiraman K,
    3. Plyler ES,
    4. Sprenkle NT,
    5. Gibson SA,
    6. McFarland BC,
    7. Rajbhandari R,
    8. Rowse AL,
    9. Benveniste EN,
    10. Meares GP
    (2016) Attenuation of PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) signaling selectively controls endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced inflammation without compromising immunological responses. J Biol Chem 291:15830–15840. doi:10.1074/jbc.M116.738021 pmid:27226638
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. He Y,
    2. Wei M,
    3. Wu Y,
    4. Qin H,
    5. Li W,
    6. Ma X,
    7. Cheng J,
    8. Ren J,
    9. Shen Y,
    10. Chen Z,
    11. Sun B,
    12. Huang FD,
    13. Shen Y,
    14. Zhou YD
    (2019) Amyloid beta oligomers suppress excitatory transmitter release via presynaptic depletion of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. Nat Commun 10:1193. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09114-z pmid:30867420
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Hiendlmeyer E,
    2. Regus S,
    3. Wassermann S,
    4. Hlubek F,
    5. Haynl A,
    6. Dimmler A,
    7. Koch C,
    8. Knoll C,
    9. van Beest M,
    10. Reuning U,
    11. Brabletz T,
    12. Kirchner T,
    13. Jung A
    (2004) Beta-catenin up-regulates the expression of the urokinase plasminogen activator in human colorectal tumors. Cancer Res 64:1209–1214. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-3627-2 pmid:14973118
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Honjo Y,
    2. Nakagawa S,
    3. Takeichi M
    (2000) Blockade of cadherin-6B activity perturbs the distribution of PSD-95 family proteins in retinal neurones. Genes Cells 5:309–318. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2443.2000.00327.x pmid:10792468
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Hoozemans JJ,
    2. van Haastert ES,
    3. Nijholt DA,
    4. Rozemuller AJ,
    5. Eikelenboom P,
    6. Scheper W
    (2009) The unfolded protein response is activated in pretangle neurons in Alzheimer's disease hippocampus. Am J Pathol 174:1241–1251. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2009.080814 pmid:19264902
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Hsia AY,
    2. Masliah E,
    3. McConlogue L,
    4. Yu GQ,
    5. Tatsuno G,
    6. Hu K,
    7. Kholodenko D,
    8. Malenka RC,
    9. Nicoll RA,
    10. Mucke L
    (1999) Plaque-independent disruption of neural circuits in Alzheimer's disease mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:3228–3233. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.6.3228 pmid:10077666
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Jacobsen JS,
    2. Wu CC,
    3. Redwine JM,
    4. Comery TA,
    5. Arias R,
    6. Bowlby M,
    7. Martone R,
    8. Morrison JH,
    9. Pangalos MN,
    10. Reinhart PH,
    11. Bloom FE
    (2006) Early-onset behavioral and synaptic deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5161–5166. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600948103 pmid:16549764
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Jeanneret V,
    2. Ospina JP,
    3. Diaz A,
    4. Manrique LG,
    5. Merino P,
    6. Gutierrez L,
    7. Torre E,
    8. Wu F,
    9. Cheng L,
    10. Yepes M
    (2018) Tissue-type plasminogen activator protects the postsynaptic density in the ischemic brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 38:1896–1910.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Jin M,
    2. Shepardson N,
    3. Yang T,
    4. Chen G,
    5. Walsh D,
    6. Selkoe DJ
    (2011) Soluble amyloid beta-protein dimers isolated from Alzheimer cortex directly induce Tau hyperphosphorylation and neuritic degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5819–5824. doi:10.1073/pnas.1017033108 pmid:21421841
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Kamenetz F,
    2. Tomita T,
    3. Hsieh H,
    4. Seabrook G,
    5. Borchelt D,
    6. Iwatsubo T,
    7. Sisodia S,
    8. Malinow R
    (2003) APP processing and synaptic function. Neuron 37:925–937. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00124-7 pmid:12670422
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Kawarabayashi T,
    2. Younkin LH,
    3. Saido TC,
    4. Shoji M,
    5. Ashe KH,
    6. Younkin SG
    (2001) Age-dependent changes in brain, CSF, and plasma amyloid (beta) protein in the Tg2576 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 21:372–381. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-02-00372.2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Kleiner S,
    2. Faisal A,
    3. Nagamine Y
    (2007) Induction of uPA gene expression by the blockage of E-cadherin via Src- and Shc-dependent Erk signaling. FEBS J 274:227–240. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05578.x pmid:17222183
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Lacor PN,
    2. Buniel MC,
    3. Furlow PW,
    4. Clemente AS,
    5. Velasco PT,
    6. Wood M,
    7. Viola KL,
    8. Klein WL
    (2007) Abeta oligomer-induced aberrations in synapse composition, shape, and density provide a molecular basis for loss of connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 27:796–807. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3501-06.2007 pmid:17251419
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Lambert MP,
    2. Barlow AK,
    3. Chromy BA,
    4. Edwards C,
    5. Freed R,
    6. Liosatos M,
    7. Morgan TE,
    8. Rozovsky I,
    9. Trommer B,
    10. Viola KL,
    11. Wals P,
    12. Zhang C,
    13. Finch CE,
    14. Krafft GA,
    15. Klein WL
    (1998) Diffusible, nonfibrillar ligands derived from Abeta1-42 are potent central nervous system neurotoxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6448–6453. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.11.6448 pmid:9600986
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Lesne S,
    2. Ali C,
    3. Gabriel C,
    4. Croci N,
    5. MacKenzie ET,
    6. Glabe CG,
    7. Plotkine M,
    8. Marchand-Verrecchia C,
    9. Vivien D,
    10. Buisson A
    (2005) NMDA receptor activation inhibits alpha-secretase and promotes neuronal amyloid-beta production. J Neurosci 25:9367–9377. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0849-05.2005 pmid:16221845
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Lue LF,
    2. Kuo YM,
    3. Roher AE,
    4. Brachova L,
    5. Shen Y,
    6. Sue L,
    7. Beach T,
    8. Kurth JH,
    9. Rydel RE,
    10. Rogers J
    (1999) Soluble amyloid beta peptide concentration as a predictor of synaptic change in Alzheimer's disease. Am J Pathol 155:853–862. doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65184-x pmid:10487842
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Ma T,
    2. Trinh MA,
    3. Wexler AJ,
    4. Bourbon C,
    5. Gatti E,
    6. Pierre P,
    7. Cavener DR,
    8. Klann E
    (2013) Suppression of eIF2alpha kinases alleviates Alzheimer's disease-related plasticity and memory deficits. Nat Neurosci 16:1299–1305. doi:10.1038/nn.3486 pmid:23933749
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Marciniak SJ,
    2. Garcia-Bonilla L,
    3. Hu J,
    4. Harding HP,
    5. Ron D
    (2006) Activation-dependent substrate recruitment by the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 kinase PERK. J Cell Biol 172:201–209. doi:10.1083/jcb.200508099 pmid:16418533
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Martin LJ,
    2. Pardo CA,
    3. Cork LC,
    4. Price DL
    (1994) Synaptic pathology and glial responses to neuronal injury precede the formation of senile plaques and amyloid deposits in the aging cerebral cortex. Am J Pathol 145:1358–1381. pmid:7992840
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Melchor JP,
    2. Pawlak R,
    3. Strickland S
    (2003) The tissue plasminogen activator-plasminogen proteolytic cascade accelerates amyloid-beta (Abeta) degradation and inhibits Abeta-induced neurodegeneration. J Neurosci 23:8867–8871. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-26-08867.2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Mendez P,
    2. De Roo M,
    3. Poglia L,
    4. Klauser P,
    5. Muller D
    (2010) N-cadherin mediates plasticity-induced long-term spine stabilization. J Cell Biol 189:589–600. doi:10.1083/jcb.201003007 pmid:20440002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Merino P,
    2. Diaz A,
    3. Jeanneret V,
    4. Wu F,
    5. Torre E,
    6. Cheng L,
    7. Yepes M
    (2017) Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) binding to the uPA receptor (uPAR) promotes axonal regeneration in the central nervous system. J Biol Chem 292:2741–2753. doi:10.1074/jbc.M116.761650
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Munshi HG,
    2. Ghosh S,
    3. Mukhopadhyay S,
    4. Wu YI,
    5. Sen R,
    6. Green KJ,
    7. Stack MS
    (2002) Proteinase suppression by E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell attachment in premalignant oral keratinocytes. J Biol Chem 277:38159–38167. doi:10.1074/jbc.M202384200 pmid:12138162
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Nikitczuk JS,
    2. Patil SB,
    3. Matikainen-Ankney BA,
    4. Scarpa J,
    5. Shapiro ML,
    6. Benson DL,
    7. Huntley GW
    (2014) N-cadherin regulates molecular organization of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic circuits in adult hippocampus in vivo. Hippocampus 24:943–962. doi:10.1002/hipo.22282 pmid:24753442
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Ozturk A,
    2. Minster RL,
    3. DeKosky ST,
    4. Kamboh MI
    (2007) Association of tagSNPs in the urokinase-plasminogen activator (PLAU) gene with Alzheimer's disease and associated quantitative traits. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 144B:79–82. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30403 pmid:16967469
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Pielarski KN,
    2. van Stegen B,
    3. Andreyeva A,
    4. Nieweg K,
    5. Jungling K,
    6. Redies C,
    7. Gottmann K
    (2013) Asymmetric N-cadherin expression results in synapse dysfunction, synapse elimination, and axon retraction in cultured mouse neurons. PLoS One 8:e54105. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054105 pmid:23382872
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Plant LD,
    2. Boyle JP,
    3. Smith IF,
    4. Peers C,
    5. Pearson HA
    (2003) The production of amyloid beta peptide is a critical requirement for the viability of central neurons. J Neurosci 23:5531–5535. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05531.2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Prager GW,
    2. Breuss JM,
    3. Steurer S,
    4. Mihaly J,
    5. Binder BR
    (2004) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induces rapid prourokinase (pro-uPA) activation on the surface of endothelial cells. Blood 103:955–962. doi:10.1182/blood-2003-07-2214 pmid:14525763
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Price JL,
    2. Morris JC
    (1999) Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 45:358–368. doi:10.1002/1531-8249(199903)45:3<358::AID-ANA12>3.0.CO;2-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Sanes JR,
    2. Yamagata M
    (1999) Formation of lamina-specific synaptic connections. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:79–87. doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)80010-5 pmid:10072367
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Sasaki CY,
    2. Lin H,
    3. Passaniti A
    (1999) Regulation of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) activity by E-cadherin and hormones in mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol 181:1–13. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199910)181:1<1::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-B
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Selkoe DJ
    (2002) Alzheimer's disease is a synaptic failure. Science 298:789–791. doi:10.1126/science.1074069 pmid:12399581
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Selkoe DJ,
    2. Yamazaki T,
    3. Citron M,
    4. Podlisny MB,
    5. Koo EH,
    6. Teplow DB,
    7. Haass C
    (1996) The role of APP processing and trafficking pathways in the formation of amyloid beta-protein. Ann NY Acad Sci 777:57–64. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb34401.x pmid:8624127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Shan W,
    2. Yoshida M,
    3. Wu XR,
    4. Huntley GW,
    5. Colman DR
    (2002) Neural (N-) cadherin, a synaptic adhesion molecule, is induced in hippocampal mossy fiber axonal sprouts by seizure. J Neurosci Res 69:292–304. doi:10.1002/jnr.10305 pmid:12125071
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Shankar GM,
    2. Bloodgood BL,
    3. Townsend M,
    4. Walsh DM,
    5. Selkoe DJ,
    6. Sabatini BL
    (2007) Natural oligomers of the Alzheimer amyloid-beta protein induce reversible synapse loss by modulating an NMDA-type glutamate receptor-dependent signaling pathway. J Neurosci 27:2866–2875. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4970-06.2007 pmid:17360908
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Sompol P,
    2. Furman JL,
    3. Pleiss MM,
    4. Kraner SD,
    5. Artiushin IA,
    6. Batten SR,
    7. Quintero JE,
    8. Simmerman LA,
    9. Beckett TL,
    10. Lovell MA,
    11. Murphy MP,
    12. Gerhardt GA,
    13. Norris CM
    (2017) Calcineurin/NFAT signaling in activated astrocytes drives network hyperexcitability in Abeta-bearing mice. J Neurosci 37:6132–6148. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0877-17.2017 pmid:28559377
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Tanaka H,
    2. Shan W,
    3. Phillips GR,
    4. Arndt K,
    5. Bozdagi O,
    6. Shapiro L,
    7. Huntley GW,
    8. Benson DL,
    9. Colman DR
    (2000) Molecular modification of N-cadherin in response to synaptic activity. Neuron 25:93–107. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80874-0 pmid:10707975
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Terry RD,
    2. Masliah E,
    3. Salmon DP,
    4. Butters N,
    5. DeTeresa R,
    6. Hill R,
    7. Hansen LA,
    8. Katzman R
    (1991) Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer's disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol 30:572–580. doi:10.1002/ana.410300410 pmid:1789684
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Togashi H,
    2. Abe K,
    3. Mizoguchi A,
    4. Takaoka K,
    5. Chisaka O,
    6. Takeichi M
    (2002) Cadherin regulates dendritic spine morphogenesis. Neuron 35:77–89. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00748-1 pmid:12123610
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Tucker HM,
    2. Kihiko M,
    3. Caldwell JN,
    4. Wright S,
    5. Kawarabayashi T,
    6. Price D,
    7. Walker D,
    8. Scheff S,
    9. McGillis JP,
    10. Rydel RE,
    11. Estus S
    (2000) The plasmin system is induced by and degrades amyloid-beta aggregates. J Neurosci 20:3937–3946. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-03937.2000
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Uchida N,
    2. Honjo Y,
    3. Johnson KR,
    4. Wheelock MJ,
    5. Takeichi M
    (1996) The catenin/cadherin adhesion system is localized in synaptic junctions bordering transmitter release zones. J Cell Biol 135:767–779. doi:10.1083/jcb.135.3.767 pmid:8909549
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Whelan CD,
    2. Mattsson N,
    3. Nagle MW,
    4. Vijayaraghavan S,
    5. Hyde C,
    6. Janelidze S,
    7. Stomrud E,
    8. Lee J,
    9. Fitz L,
    10. Samad TA,
    11. Ramaswamy G,
    12. Margolin RA,
    13. Malarstig A,
    14. Hansson O
    (2019) Multiplex proteomics identifies novel CSF and plasma biomarkers of early Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7:169. doi:10.1186/s40478-019-0795-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    1. Zhai RG,
    2. Vardinon-Friedman H,
    3. Cases-Langhoff C,
    4. Becker B,
    5. Gundelfinger ED,
    6. Ziv NE,
    7. Garner CC
    (2001) Assembling the presynaptic active zone: a characterization of an active one precursor vesicle. Neuron 29:131–143. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00185-4 pmid:11182086
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 40 (21)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 40, Issue 21
20 May 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Protects Cerebral Cortical Neurons from Soluble Aβ-Induced Synaptic Damage
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Protects Cerebral Cortical Neurons from Soluble Aβ-Induced Synaptic Damage
Ariel Diaz, Paola Merino, Ji-Dong Guo, Manuel A. Yepes, Patrick McCann, Tapasya Katta, Elise M. Tong, Enrique Torre, Srikant Rangaraju, Manuel Yepes
Journal of Neuroscience 20 May 2020, 40 (21) 4251-4263; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2804-19.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Protects Cerebral Cortical Neurons from Soluble Aβ-Induced Synaptic Damage
Ariel Diaz, Paola Merino, Ji-Dong Guo, Manuel A. Yepes, Patrick McCann, Tapasya Katta, Elise M. Tong, Enrique Torre, Srikant Rangaraju, Manuel Yepes
Journal of Neuroscience 20 May 2020, 40 (21) 4251-4263; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2804-19.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • plasmin
  • plasminogen system
  • urokinase

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Dual regulation of spine-specific and synapse-to-nucleus signaling by PKCδ during plasticity
  • Cholinergic stimulation modulates the functional composition of CA3 cell types in the hippocampus
  • Behavioral state-dependent modulation of prefrontal cortex activity by respiration
Show more Research Articles

Neurobiology of Disease

  • Restoration of sleep and circadian behavior by autophagy modulation in Huntington’s disease
  • The stria vascularis in mice and humans is an early site of age-related cochlear degeneration, macrophage dysfunction, and inflammation
  • A New Mouse Model of Giant Axonal Neuropathy with Overt Phenotypes and Neurodegeneration Driven by Neurofilament Disorganization
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.