Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2020, 40 (29) 5511; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.40.29.2020
Teresa Esch
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Extending an Olfactory Critical Period in Drosophila

Ankita Chodankar, Madhumala K. Sadanandappa, Krishnaswamy VijayRaghavan, and Mani Ramaswami

(see pages 5549–5560)

Sensory systems are designed to extract information from the environment; because constant stimuli provide little information, the nervous system reduces its responses to such stimuli. These adaptations can be mediated by short-term changes, like receptor desensitization, or much longer lasting changes involving circuit remodeling. Circuit remodeling is often restricted to critical periods early in life, however.

In Drosophila flies, continuous exposure to an odor for 4 d induces long-term habituation that lasts ∼6 d. This habituation is mediated by increased inhibitory input to antennal lobe projection neurons (PNs) from local interneurons (LNs), and it is accompanied by volume changes selectively in glomeruli activated by the habituating odor. Notably, long-term habituation for several aversive odors, including CO2 and ethyl butyrate, can only be induced in young flies. In contrast, no critical period exists for long-term habituation to the attractive odor geranyl acetate.

To better understand critical periods for olfactory habituation, Chodankar et al. exposed flies of different ages to CO2 or ethyl butyrate. Four-day odor exposure beginning <36 h after eclosion induced long-term behavioral habituation accompanied by enlargement of odor-specific glomeruli. No behavioral habituation or volume changes occurred if odor exposure began >48 h after eclosion, however, unless olfactory sensory neurons were silenced for the first 48 h after eclosion. Importantly, selectively silencing sensory neurons that respond to a particular odor extended the critical period only for that odor.

Glomerular enlargement during habituation was accompanied by increases in dendritic arborization and postsynaptic sites only in PNs in glomeruli that responded to the habituating odor. Like behavioral habituation and glomerular growth, the increase in PN dendritic arborization required the expression of rutabaga, a Ca2+/calmodulin-responsive adenylyl cyclase, in LNs. Rutabaga expression was also required in LNs for habitation-associated glomerular growth induced by geranyl acetate exposure.

These results show that closure of the critical period for long-term habituation in flies, like closure of the critical period for ocular dominance plasticity in mammals, requires sensory experience. Importantly, this regulation can be restricted to specific glomeruli by selectively silencing input to those glomeruli. How sensory experience closes the critical period and why the critical period does not close for geranyl acetate despite similar mechanisms of habituation must be investigated in future work.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Presynaptic terminals (purple) delineate olfactory glomeruli in Drosophila antennal lobes. VA6 glomeruli are innervated by sensory neurons that respond to geranyl acetate (green). See Chodankar et al. for details.

Links between Inflammation, Glucose, and Brain Function

John Kealy, Carol Murray, Eadaoin W. Griffin, Ana Belen Lopez-Rodriguez, Dáire Healy, et al.

(see pages 5681–5696)

Cytokines released during peripheral infections alter brain function, suppressing the desire to engage in physical activity and social interactions. These effects help conserve energy, promote recovery, and limit the spread of infection. But peripheral infections can also have detrimental effects on brain function, particularly by causing delirium, characterized by sudden, fluctuating attention deficits, confusion, and other cognitive symptoms. Although these symptoms typically resolve within a day, they can persist for months, prolong recovery, and increase the risk of dementia. Delirium is rare in otherwise healthy adults, but itis common in elderly people and thosewith underlying neurological conditions, in whom it occurs after >50% of hip fracture surgeries and sometimes during minor infections (Cunningham and MacLullich, 2013, Brain Behav Immun 28:1–13).

How cytokines alter behavior and why pre-existing neurological conditions increase the risk of delirium are incompletely understood. Kealy, Murray, et al. hypothesized that deficient glucose metabolism plays a role. To test this, they examined the relationship between blood glucose levels and sickness behaviors induced in mice by peripheral injection of the inflammatory agent lipopolysaccharide (LPS). As expected, LPS reduced spontaneous locomotion and increased plasma levels of the cytokine interleukin-1β. It also reduced blood and CSF glucose levels. Notably, activity levels were correlated with blood glucose levels in LPS-injected mice, but not in control mice. Moreover, glucose administration increased locomotion in LPS-treated mice without affecting interleukin-1β levels, and interfering with interleukin-1β signaling had no effect on LPS-induced decreases in blood glucose levels or spontaneous locomotion.

Like delirium, working memory is impaired after LPS injection only in mice with pre-existing conditions, such as prion-induced neurodegeneration. Kealy, Murray, et al. showed that insulin, which lowers blood glucose levels, also caused working-memory deficits selectively in mice with prion-induced neurodegeneration, and that glucose administration reduced LPS-induced working-memory deficits in such mice. Finally, markers of impaired glucose metabolism were higher in CSF of elderly patients who experienced delirium after hip fracture surgery than in patients who did not experience delirium.

These results suggest that systemic inflammation reduces blood glucose levels and that this hypoglycemia, rather than interleukin-1β, underlies reductions in activity. Impaired glucose metabolism associated with age or neurodegenerative disease may exacerbate the effects of infection-associated hypoglycemia, and thus increase the risk of delirium.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 40 (29)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 40, Issue 29
15 Jul 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2020, 40 (29) 5511; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.40.29.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2020, 40 (29) 5511; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.40.29.2020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Extending an Olfactory Critical Period in Drosophila
    • Links between Inflammation, Glucose, and Brain Function
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.