Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Alkalinization of the Synaptic Cleft during Excitatory Neurotransmission

Peter J. Niesman and Valeria Silva
Journal of Neuroscience 12 August 2020, 40 (33) 6267-6269; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0914-20.2020
Peter J. Niesman
1Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter J. Niesman
Valeria Silva
2Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia de Valparaíso, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2360102, Chile
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Valeria Silva
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Synaptic transmission has been studied for decades to understand the fundamental properties underlying neural communication, yet some basic questions about synaptic transmission remain unanswered. Historically, ribbon synapses have been a particularly important model because of the massive amounts of vesicles released during neurotransmission (Von Gersdorff and Mathews, 1994). Preparations of ribbon synapses from various organisms revealed the importance of calcium influx on vesicle release exocytosis and also showed acidification of the synaptic cleft because of joint release of neurotransmitters with protons (H+; DeVries, 2001; Palmer et al., 2003; Hirasawa et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014; Vincent et al., 2018). Although the necessity of calcium for vesicle release has been confirmed across synapse types, whether cleft acidification occurs at all synapses remains unclear. The current belief that transmitter release acidifies the cleft is mostly based on ribbon synapses, which release 10 to 100 times more vesicles than a typical mammalian central synapse.

Whether central excitatory synapses undergo acidification or alkalinization during synaptic transmission is less clear because of mixed results from different groups. A previous study using rat hippocampal slices reported acidification in the cleft during neurotransmitter release (Krishtal et al., 1987), as observed at ribbon synapses, while a different group showed alkalinization after transmission in the same preparation (Gottfried and Chesler, 1996; reviewed in Sinning and Hübner, 2013). These variations may have resulted from technical limitations, since in both studies the authors measured pH changes with pH sensitive dyes filling the entire extrasynaptic space, instead of directly examining the pH shifts in the synaptic cleft. Additionally, the pH shifts at ribbon synapses are larger and easier to detect than the pH shifts at central synapses.

A recent study (Stawarski et al., 2020) published in The Journal of Neuroscience addresses some of these weaknesses and strengthens the support for alkalinization of glutamatergic synaptic clefts by neurotransmitter release. The authors used a pH fluorescent sensor called “pHusion-Ex” to measure pH oscillations in the synaptic cleft. pHusion-Ex was created by fusing a pH-sensitive green fluorescent protein-based sensor (pHluorin; Sankaranarayanan et al., 2000) with a low-toxicity red fluorescent protein (FusionRed; Shemiakina et al., 2012). This fusion protein was then expressed at the cleft of the Drosophila larva neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Ratiometric imaging in vivo in intact larvae revealed alkalinization of the cleft in response to locomotion. The authors then measured pH transients in response to single action potentials at the larval NMJ in ex vivo preparations. Again, alkalinization was measured at the cleft, albeit at a much smaller magnitude than during locomotion in vivo. The authors switched to using a chemical indicator to detect pH transients at the NMJ to strengthen the support for alkalinization, and this also indicated alkalinization of the cleft.

To address the possibility that rapid cleft acidification went undetected, high-frequency (560 Hz) imaging was performed at the cleft. No evidence of acidification was found using the pHusion-Ex sensor. Yet, it is possible that acidification occurs only immediately proximal to active zones of vesicle release. To test this, SE-pHluorin, another pH sensor, was fused to voltage-gated calcium channels to restrict its expression to active zones in the presynaptic neuron. Again, no evidence for any acidification was seen: only alkalinization of the cleft was observed.

Regulation of pH at the synapse is complex (Chesler, 2003), but evidence points to calcium transporters such as Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA) as key components in synaptic pH homeostasis. These transporters can rapidly exchange cytosolic Ca2+ for external H+ (Makani and Chesler, 2010). Therefore, Stawarski and colleagues hypothesized that calcium, through the PMCA transporter, drives cleft alkalinization. Simultaneous imaging with SE-pHluorin in the cleft and jRGECO1a (intracellular calcium indicator) in the postsynaptic neuron shows cross-correlation between these transients. However, these measurements are indirect and alone do not support a causal role for the PMCA transporter. An informative extension of this work would be to block the PMCA transporter using PMCA inhibitors such as carboxyeosin (Makani and Chesler, 2010), and measure if cleft alkalinization still occurs.

To extend these conclusions past the Drosophila NMJ, Stawarski et al. (2020) examined the Calyx of Held synapse in acute brain slices from mice. Extracellular-facing pHusion-Ex revealed alkalinization of the cleft during an action potential train. In contrast, acidification of the presynaptic cytosol was seen using cytosolic facing pHusion-Ex. The magnitude of the acidification appeared larger and more persistent than the cleft alkalinization. As expected, the cleft alkalinization was reduced by increasing extracellular buffering capacity, whereas cytosolic acidification was unaffected. Together these results provide the strongest evidence to date for cleft alkalinization of excitatory synapses using the Drosophila NMJ and the mouse Calyx of Held synapse.

One likely effect of alkalinization of the cleft at glutamatergic synapses is altering the action of pH-sensitive potassium channels in neurons. Since most two-pore acid sensitive K+ (TASK) channels are impaired by cleft acidification and enhanced by cleft alkalinization (Ma et al., 2012), repeated neuronal firing would increase outward K+ currents, lowering neuronal excitability. Although these ion channels are not broadly expressed, both TASK-1 and TASK-3 are present in the rodent spinal cord (García et al., 2019). These TASK channels play an antinociceptive role by reducing overall firing rate induced by formalin injection. These results fit together nicely, suggesting that in vivo firing of a glutamatergic spinal afferent may lead to cleft alkalinization and increase outward K+ currents, homeostatically lowering excitability.

It is well accepted that pH homeostasis is critical for neural communication, although no direct role has been identified for physiological pH changes during synaptic transmission (Chesler, 2003). The most frequently hypothesized role of physiological pH changes at the synaptic cleft is to affect short term synaptic plasticity by altering the sensitivity of neurotransmitter receptors. While numerous studies have examined the pH-dependence of various neurotransmitter receptors, including the ionotropic glutamate receptors AMPA and NMDA, the magnitude of the differences are often small at physiological pH ranges (Traynelis and Cull-Candy, 1991). Also, many short-term plasticity mechanisms are well accounted for by calcium signaling pathways affecting presynaptic release (Jackman and Regehr, 2017), suggesting pH may not be involved in short-term plasticity. While it is possible that pH may play a complementary role in short-term synaptic plasticity, it may play a key role in other cellular processes involved in neurotransmitter release, such as regulating endocytosis and vesicle refilling.

Acidification of glutamatergic presynaptic terminals and alkalinization of the cleft may play a role in the regulation of the synaptic vesicle cycle. The rate of various steps of the synaptic vesicle cycle is regulated by neurotransmitter transporters, the H+ electrochemical gradient, and the actin cytoskeleton. Previous work has demonstrated how acidic pH facilitates glutamate uptake into vesicles through an allosteric mechanism (Eriksen et al., 2016). The recently published structure of VGLUT2 identified pH sensitive residues that are critical for transporter function (F. Li et al., 2020), further supporting the regulation of glutamate loading by pH. Recently, the regulation of the H+ gradient by cation/H+ exchangers (Na+/H+ and K+/H+), which facilitate the vesicle refill process of glutamatergic synapses (Goh et al., 2011), was shown to be very important for high-frequency spiking neurons (D. Li et al., 2020). These exchangers may contribute to acidification of the presynaptic terminal, which can enhance the rate of glutamate loading into vesicles. Additionally, actin dynamics have been shown to be important for mediating endocytosis (Boulant et al., 2011), and actin polymerization has been shown to be enhanced by acidic conditions (Crevenna et al., 2013). Therefore, acidification of the presynaptic cytosol (Stawarski et al., 2020) could link vesicle release to vesicle endocytosis, and the magnitude of acidification of the presynaptic terminal could determine the rate of endocytosis.

The recently published study by Stawarski and colleagues provides strong support for the alkalinization of the synaptic cleft at excitatory glutamatergic synapses. While the mechanism underlying the alkalinization remains incompletely understood, it likely involves the PMCA transporter. We think these findings will prove important not for short-term synaptic plasticity, but for regulating key steps of the synaptic vesicle cycle such as vesicle loading and endocytosis.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/jneurosci-journal-club.

  • This work was supported by financial support from CONICYT #21191720 to V.S. We thank Michael Nitabach and John Ewer for their mentorship.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Peter J. Niesman at peter.niesman{at}yale.edu or Valeria Silva at valeria.silva{at}cinv.cl

References

  1. ↵
    1. Boulant S,
    2. Kural C,
    3. Zeeh J-C,
    4. Ubelmann F,
    5. Kirchhausen T
    (2011) Actin dynamics counteract membrane tension during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Cell Biol 13:1124–1131. doi:10.1038/ncb2307 pmid:21841790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Chesler M
    (2003) Regulation and modulation of pH in the brain. Physiol Rev 83:1183–1221. doi:10.1152/physrev.00010.2003 pmid:14506304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Crevenna AH,
    2. Naredi-Rainer N,
    3. Schönichen A,
    4. Dzubiella J,
    5. Barber DL,
    6. Lamb DC,
    7. Wedlich-Söldner R
    (2013) Electrostatics control actin filament nucleation and elongation kinetics. J Biol Chem 288:12102–12113. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.456327 pmid:23486468
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. DeVries SH
    (2001) Exocytosed protons feedback to suppress the Ca2+ current in mammalian cone photoreceptors. Neuron 32:1107–1117. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00535-9 pmid:11754841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Eriksen J,
    2. Chang R,
    3. McGregor M,
    4. Silm K,
    5. Suzuki T,
    6. Edwards RH
    (2016) Protons regulate vesicular glutamate transporters through an allosteric mechanism. Neuron 90:768–780. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.026 pmid:27133463
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. García G,
    2. Noriega-Navarro R,
    3. Martínez-Rojas VA,
    4. Gutiérrez-Lara EJ,
    5. Oviedo N,
    6. Murbartián J
    (2019) Spinal TASK-1 and TASK-3 modulate inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol 862:172631. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172631 pmid:31472119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Goh GY,
    2. Huang H,
    3. Ullman J,
    4. Borre L,
    5. Hnasko TS,
    6. Trussell LO,
    7. Edwards RH
    (2011) Presynaptic regulation of quantal size: K+/H+ exchange stimulates vesicular glutamate transport. Nat Neurosci 14:1285–1292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Gottfried JA,
    2. Chesler M
    (1996) Temporal resolution of activity-dependent pH shifts in rat hippocampal slices. J Neurophysiol 76:2804–2807.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Hirasawa H,
    2. Yamada M,
    3. Kaneko A
    (2012) Acidification of the synaptic cleft of cone photoreceptor terminal controls the amount of transmitter release, thereby forming the receptive field surround in the vertebrate retina. J Physiol Sci 62:359–375. doi:10.1007/s12576-012-0220-0 pmid:22773408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Jackman SL,
    2. Regehr WG
    (2017) The mechanisms and functions of synaptic facilitation. Neuron 94:447–464. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.047 pmid:28472650
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Krishtal OA,
    2. Osipchuk YV,
    3. Shelest TN,
    4. Smirnoff SV
    (1987) Rapid extracellular pH transients related to synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal slices. Brain Res 436:352–356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Li D,
    2. Zhu Y,
    3. Huang H
    (2020) Spike activity regulates vesicle filling at a glutamatergic synapse. J Neurosci 26:4972–4980.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Li F,
    2. Eriksen J,
    3. Finer-Moore J,
    4. Chang R,
    5. Nguyen P,
    6. Bowen A,
    7. Myasnikov A,
    8. Yu Z,
    9. Bulkley D,
    10. Cheng Y,
    11. Edwards RH,
    12. Stroud RM
    (2020) Ion transport and regulation in a synaptic vesicle glutamate transporter. Science 368:893–897.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Ma L,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Zhou M,
    4. Chen H
    (2012) Acid-sensitive TWIK and TASK two-pore domain potassium channels change ion selectivity and become permeable to sodium in extracellular acidification. J Biol Chem 287:37145–37153. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.398164 pmid:22948150
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Makani S,
    2. Chesler M
    (2010) Rapid rise of extracellular pH evoked by neural activity is generated by the plasma membrane calcium ATPase. J Neurophysiol 103:667–676. doi:10.1152/jn.00948.2009 pmid:19939954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Palmer MJ,
    2. Hull C,
    3. Vigh J,
    4. Gersdorff H von
    (2003) Synaptic cleft acidification and modulation of short-term depression by exocytosed protons in retinal bipolar cells. J Neurosci 23:11332–11341. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-36-11332.2003 pmid:14672997
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Sankaranarayanan S,
    2. Angelis DD,
    3. Rothman JE,
    4. Ryan TA
    (2000) The use of pHluorins for optical measurements of presynaptic activity. Biophys J 79:2199–2208. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76468-X pmid:11023924
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Shemiakina II,
    2. Ermakova GV,
    3. Cranfill PJ,
    4. Baird MA,
    5. Evans RA,
    6. Souslova EA,
    7. Staroverov DB,
    8. Gorokhovatsky AY,
    9. Putintseva EV,
    10. Gorodnicheva TV,
    11. Chepurnykh TV,
    12. Strukova L,
    13. Lukyanov S,
    14. Zaraisky AG,
    15. Davidson MW,
    16. Chudakov DM,
    17. Shcherbo D
    (2012) A monomeric red fluorescent protein with low cytotoxicity. Nat Commun 3:1204. doi:10.1038/ncomms2208 pmid:23149748
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Sinning A,
    2. Hübner CA
    (2013) Minireview: pH and synaptic transmission. FEBS Lett 587:1923–1928. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.04.045 pmid:23669358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Stawarski M,
    2. Hernandez RX,
    3. Feghhi T,
    4. Borycz JA,
    5. Lu Z,
    6. Agarwal AB,
    7. Reihl KD,
    8. Tavora R,
    9. Lau AWC,
    10. Meinertzhagen IA,
    11. Renden R,
    12. Macleod GT
    (2020) Neuronal glutamatergic synaptic clefts alkalinize rather than acidify during neurotransmission. J Neurosci 40:1611–1624. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1774-19.2020 pmid:31964719
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Traynelis SF,
    2. Cull-Candy SG
    (1991) Pharmacological properties and H+ sensitivity of excitatory amino acid receptor channels in rat cerebellar granule neurones. J Physiol 433:727–763. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018453 pmid:1726797
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Vincent PFY,
    2. Cho S,
    3. Tertrais M,
    4. Bouleau Y,
    5. von GH,
    6. Dulon D
    (2018) Clustered Ca2+ channels are blocked by synaptic vesicle proton release at mammalian auditory ribbon synapses. Cell Rep 25:3451–3464.e3. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.072 pmid:30566869
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Von Gersdorff H,
    2. Mathews G
    (1994) Dynamics of synaptic vesicle fusion and membrane retrieval in synaptic terminals. Nature 367:735–739. doi:10.1038/367735a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Wang T-M,
    2. Holzhausen LC,
    3. Kramer RH
    (2014) Imaging an optogenetic pH sensor reveals that protons mediate lateral inhibition in the retina. Nat Neurosci 17:262–268. doi:10.1038/nn.3627 pmid:24441679
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 40 (33)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 40, Issue 33
12 Aug 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Alkalinization of the Synaptic Cleft during Excitatory Neurotransmission
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Alkalinization of the Synaptic Cleft during Excitatory Neurotransmission
Peter J. Niesman, Valeria Silva
Journal of Neuroscience 12 August 2020, 40 (33) 6267-6269; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0914-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Alkalinization of the Synaptic Cleft during Excitatory Neurotransmission
Peter J. Niesman, Valeria Silva
Journal of Neuroscience 12 August 2020, 40 (33) 6267-6269; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0914-20.2020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Obesity and Gut–Brain Communication: The Cholinergic-Endocannabinoid Link
  • Unraveling Pallido-Retrorubral Circuits Linking the Basal Ganglia to Limbic Areas
  • µ-Opioid Receptor Control of Glutamate/GABA Coreleasing SUM and VTA Projections to the Dentate Gyrus
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.