Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 19 August 2020, 40 (34) 6459; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.40.34.2020
Teresa Esch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

A Transporter That Removes D-Serine from Synapses

Oded Bodner, Inna Radzishevsky, Veronika N. Foltyn, Ayelet Touitou, Alec C. Valenta, et al.

(see pages 6489–6502)

NMDA receptors (NMDARs) are essential for many types of synaptic plasticity, and thus for learning and cognition. Activation of NMDARs requires not only glutamate binding and postsynaptic depolarization, but also binding of a coagonist. This coagonist can be glycine or D-serine, but one or the other plays a more prominent role depending on the brain area, NMDAR subunit composition, and other factors. D-serine appears to play a predominant role in hippocampal areas CA1 and prefrontal cortex.

D-serine is produced in the brain primarily by neurons. Astrocytes produce and secrete L-serine, which is imported by neurons and converted to D-serine by serine racemase. D-serine is then released by neurons via the amino acid antiporter Asc-1. How D-serine is removed from the synapse has been unclear, however. Notably, blocking or knocking out Asc-1 or sodium-dependent alanine-serine-cysteine transporters does not increase extracellular D-serine levels, suggesting they are not essential for uptake. Bodner et al. therefore hypothesized that a different amino acid transporter is required.

Amino acid transporters typically have several substrates that compete for transport. Therefore, the authors applied different amino acids to mouse synaptosomes and asked whether any reduced D-serine uptake. Glutamine reduced uptake of both L-serine and D-serine, not only by synaptosomes, but also in cortical slices and in the striatum in vivo. Moreover, glutamine increased the NMDAR component of field EPSPs and enhanced LTP in the hippocampus. Importantly, these effects were not seen in mice lacking serine racemase.

These experiments suggested that a glutamine transporter is responsible for serine uptake in the brain. Indeed, the so-called system A transporters Slc38a1 and Slc38a2, which mediate most glutamate uptake in the brain, also mediated uptake of D-serine and L-serine when expressed in HEK cells. This uptake was reduced in the presence of excess glutamine or MeAIB, another substrate of Slc38a1 and Slc38a2.

These and additional control experiments suggest that Slc38a1 and Slc38a2 mediate the uptake of glutamine, L-serine, and D-serine in the brain. Elevating extracellular glutamine decreases D-serine uptake, increasing extracellular D-serine levels and thus increasing its binding to NMDARs. Future work should determine whether similar modulation of D-serine uptake, for example by increased glutamine release from astrocytes, regulates NMDAR activity under physiological conditions.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

At P21, basal dendrites are somewhat shorter in visual cortical pyramidal cells from dark-reared mice (green) than in those from mice raised under normal light conditions (blue). See Richards et al. for details.

Postnatal Growth of Basal Dendrites in Visual Cortex

Sarah E. V. Richards, Anna R. Moore, Alice Y. Nam, Shikhar Saxena, Suzanne Paradis, et al.

(see pages 6536–6556)

The size and shape of dendritic arbors determine the type of input neurons receive and how that input is integrated. Although gross dendritic morphology depends largely on cell type-specific genetic programs, morphological details such as branch location, and segment length are influenced by extracellular molecules and synaptic input, which regulate cytoskeletal dynamics via intracellular signaling cascades.

In Xenopus tadpoles, visual experience shapes dendritic arbors in the optic tectum. Richards et al. asked whether experience similarly shapes dendritic trees in visual cortex. To answer this, they measured basal dendrites of layer 2/3 pyramidal cells in mouse visual cortex at several points, starting before eye opening [postnatal day 7 (P7)] and continuing until the peak of the critical period (P30). They compared growth in mice housed under normal lighting conditions and mice reared in darkness, and compared wild-type mice with mice lacking Rem2, a small GTPase implicated in dendrite growth.

In normally reared wild-type mice, basal dendrites grew little between P7 and the day of eye opening (P12). Arbor length increased after that, especially in the days before the critical period opened (P21), primarily through increases in the length of individual segments, rather than branch formation. Somewhat surprisingly, dendritic arbors grew little after the onset of the critical period. Even more surprisingly, dark rearing had relatively mild effects on dendritic growth. Dendritic segments still grew between eye opening and critical period onset in dark-reared mice, but the arbors were ∼15% smaller than in wild type.

Constitutive knockout of Rem2 reduced the number of dendritic branches at P7, but this difference disappeared by eye opening, and Rem2-deficient dendrites had significantly more branches than wild type at P21. Notably, this increase in branching did not occur in dark-reared Rem2-deficient mice. Finally, sparse knockout of Rem2 starting at P21 caused transient changes in branch number, segment length, and arbor orientation.

These data suggest that visual experience has a relatively small effect on basal dendritic arbors of pyramidal cells in mouse visual cortex. This may be because cortical neurons receive more input from other cortical cells than from the periphery. The results also indicate that mature dendritic arbors must be maintained by factors like Rem3. Future work should explore the role of activity in this maintenance.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 40 (34)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 40, Issue 34
19 Aug 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 19 August 2020, 40 (34) 6459; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.40.34.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 19 August 2020, 40 (34) 6459; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.40.34.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • A Transporter That Removes D-Serine from Synapses
    • Postnatal Growth of Basal Dendrites in Visual Cortex
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.