Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 2 September 2020, 40 (36) 6821; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.40.36.2020
Teresa Esch
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Infralimbic–Accumbens Projection Suppresses Taste Aversion

Seth W. Hurley and Regina M. Carelli

(see pages 6888–6895)

The human ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and the homologous infralimbic cortex (IL) in rodents, regulates responses to appetitive and aversive stimuli. In particular, IL suppresses learned responses to stimuli when conditions change. For example, activation of IL inhibits conditioned freezing in response to a stimulus that previously predicted electrical shock, thus promoting fear extinction. Similarly, the activation of IL inhibits conditioned taste aversion.

Whereas IL likely inhibits conditioned freezing responses via projections to the amygdala, Hurley and Carelli hypothesized that IL inhibits taste aversion via projections to the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcSh), which has previously been implicated in learned taste aversion. To test their hypothesis, they induced aversive responses to sucrose by infusing sucrose solution into rats' mouths, then injecting LiCl to produce malaise. The next day, they examined how photostimulation of IL axons in NAcSh affected facial responses to infused sucrose solution, counting tongue protrusions and lip licks (appetitive responses), as well as gapes and mouth wipes (aversive responses).

As expected, rats primarily showed appetitive responses to sucrose on the first day. After LiCl pairing, however, control rats showed mainly aversive responses. Activation of IL inputs to NAcSh reduced aversive responses in male rats, but surprisingly not in females. Nonetheless, when rats of either sex were given a choice between plain and sucrose-flavored water the next day, those that had experienced IL–NAcSh pathway activation consumed more sucrose than control rats that had undergone aversion conditioning without subsequent stimulation. Furthermore, when given the opportunity to self-stimulate the IL–NAcSh pathway, both male and female rats did so, indicating activation of this pathway was reinforcing. Notably, IL–NAcSh pathway stimulation did not diminish aversive responses to intraoral infusion of the innately aversive tastant quinine.

These results suggest that projections from the IL to the NAcSh acutely inhibit learned taste aversion in male, but not in female rats. The pathway appears to facilitate extinction of learned taste aversion in both sexes, however, leading to increased sucrose consumption the next day. Activation of this pathway is reinforcing in itself, yet insufficient to suppress responses to innately aversive tastes. Future work should determine which NAcSh neurons are targeted by IL projections and further investigate the sex-dependent effects.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Stimulation of the cerebellar simplex lobule (top) or vermis (bottom) produces distinct patterns of c-Fos expression in the hippocampus. See Zeidler et al. for details.

Cerebellar Activation Modulates Hippocampal Function

Zachary Zeidler, Katerina Hoffmann, and Esther Krook-Magnuson

(see pages 6910–6926)

The cerebellum contributes to many functions beyond motor learning and coordination, including working memory, social interactions, and spatial navigation. The role of the cerebellum in spatial navigation has been proposed to involve the use of self-motion information to construct spatial maps represented by the firing of hippocampal place cells. Indeed, place cell firing properties are altered in mice in which cerebellar plasticity is impaired (Rochefort et al., 2013, Front Neural Circuits 7:35). The cerebellum does not project directly to the hippocampus, however, so how it influences hippocampal function is poorly understood.

To address this question, Zeidler et al. photostimulated two regions of cerebellar cortex—the vermis and the simplex lobule—in mice that expressed channelrhodopsin in Purkinje cells. Stimulation of either cerebellar region increased local field potential power at the stimulus frequency in the hippocampus. The rate of calcium transients measured with a fluorescent calcium indicator decreased in the hippocampus during cerebellar stimulation, but after stimulation offset, the amplitude of events increased, suggesting rebound bursting occurred. c-Fos labeling indicated that vermis stimulation increased activation of neurons in the alveus/stratum oriens and pyramidal cell layers of CA1, whereas simplex stimulation increased activation of interneurons in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus and reduced activation in CA3.

Both simplex and vermis stimulation impaired animals' performance on a hippocampus-dependent object location memory task. But performance on a hippocampus-independent object recognition task that requires similar motor function was unaffected. Effects on object location memory may have stemmed from reduced encoding of object location when Purkinje cells were activated. Object locations were encoded by more place cells in control animals than in stimulated animals; and after an object was moved, the moved object was represented by more place cells than the unmoved object in control animals, whereas both locations were encoded by similar numbers of place cells in stimulated animals.

These results demonstrate that Purkinje cells in different regions of cerebellum modulate activity in different areas of the hippocampal formation and thus influence the encoding of object location by hippocampal place cells. Future work should identify the intermediate targets that mediate this effect and how these pathways function under physiological conditions.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 40 (36)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 40, Issue 36
2 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 2 September 2020, 40 (36) 6821; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.40.36.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 2 September 2020, 40 (36) 6821; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.40.36.2020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Infralimbic–Accumbens Projection Suppresses Taste Aversion
    • Cerebellar Activation Modulates Hippocampal Function
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.