Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys

Rebecca E. Hay, Jess E. Reynolds, Melody N. Grohs, Dmitrii Paniukov, Gerald F. Giesbrecht, Nicole Letourneau, Deborah Dewey and Catherine Lebel
Journal of Neuroscience 2 September 2020, 40 (36) 6969-6977; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0481-20.2020
Rebecca E. Hay
1University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
5Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jess E. Reynolds
2Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
5Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melody N. Grohs
1University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
5Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dmitrii Paniukov
2Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
4Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
5Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerald F. Giesbrecht
4Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
5Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole Letourneau
3Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
5Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah Dewey
4Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
5Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
6Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
7Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Deborah Dewey
Catherine Lebel
2Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
5Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
6Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Catherine Lebel
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Prenatal depression is common, underrecognized, and undertreated. It has negative consequences on child behavior and brain development, yet the relationships among prenatal depression, child behavior, and children's brain structure remain unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether altered brain connectivity mediates relationships between prenatal maternal depressive symptoms and child behavior. This study included 54 human mother-child pairs. Mothers completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and 3 months postpartum. Their children had diffusion MRI at age 4.1 ± 0.8 years, and children's behavior was assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist within 6 months of their MRI scan. Structural brain connectivity of the amygdala, fornix, uncinate fasciculus, and cingulum was assessed using fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity and analyzed with maternal prenatal depressive symptoms as well as child behavior. Third trimester maternal Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores were positively associated with mean diffusivity in the amygdala-frontal tract and the cingulum, controlling for postpartum depression. Externalizing behavior had a sex interaction in the amygdala-frontal pathway; weaker connectivity (lower fractional anisotropy, higher mean diffusivity) was associated with worse behavior in boys. Amygdala-frontal connectivity mediated the relationship between third trimester depressive symptoms and child externalizing behavior in males. These findings suggest that altered brain structure is a mechanism via which prenatal depressive symptoms can impact child behavior, highlighting the importance of both recognition and intervention in prenatal depression.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Understanding how prenatal maternal depression impacts child behavior is critical for appropriately treating prenatal maternal mental health problems and improving child outcomes. Here, we show white matter changes in young children exposed to maternal prenatal depressive symptoms. Children of mothers with worse depressive symptoms had weaker white matter connectivity between areas related to emotional processing. Furthermore, connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex mediated the relationship between maternal depressive symptoms and externalizing behavior in boys, showing that altered brain structure is a possible mechanism via which maternal prenatal depression impacts children's behavior. This provides important information for understanding why children of depressed mothers may be more vulnerable to depression themselves and may help shape future guidelines on maternal prenatal care.

  • amygdala
  • brain development
  • depression
  • externalizing behavior
  • MRI
  • pregnancy

Introduction

Depressive symptoms affect up to 20% of women in pregnancy (Josefsson et al., 2001; Leung and Kaplan, 2009), yet prenatal depression is underrecognized and undertreated (Leung and Kaplan, 2009; Earls et al., 2010). Prenatal depression, independent of postnatal depression and anxiety, is associated with lower child intelligence (Barker et al., 2011; Evans et al., 2012), higher infant generalized anxiety and sleep problems (Gerardin et al., 2011), increased internalizing (e.g., anxiety and depression) and externalizing (e.g., aggression and hyperactivity) behavior in preschool children (Dawson et al., 2003), and increased risk for depression at 18 years (Pearson et al., 2013). Research has also suggested that outcomes are sex-specific: male infants exposed to prenatal depression tend to have poorer motor skills, higher generalized anxiety, and sleep problems than females (Gerardin et al., 2011). Evidence indicates that effective treatment of maternal prenatal depression improves child outcomes and is associated with lower levels of internalizing behavior (Foster et al., 2008).

Child internalizing and externalizing behavioral deficits associated with prenatal maternal depression might be explained, at least in part, by alterations to underlying neurologic structure and function. The stress response is regulated by the limbic circuit, including the cingulate cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala (Rajmohan and Mohandas, 2007; Sheikh et al., 2014). Dysfunction of these brain regions is associated with hyperactivity and aggression in children (Noordermeer et al., 2016), as well as the development of depression and stress disorders in youth and adults (Drevets et al., 2008). The amygdala is particularly important for emotional processing (Bjorkquist et al., 2016) through its connections to the frontal cortex (Banks et al., 2007). Altered connectivity between the amygdala and frontal cortex is associated with disruptive behaviors (Ibrahim et al., 2019), vulnerability to depression (van Eijndhoven et al., 2009; Price and Drevets, 2010; Holmes et al., 2012; Malykhin et al., 2012), anxiety, and increased stress reactivity (Prater et al., 2013; Fowler et al., 2017).

Maternal prenatal depression may impact child behavior by altering this neurologic circuit in utero. Indeed, prenatal depression is associated with altered amygdala functional connectivity in 6-month-old infants and 4.5-year-old children (Qiu et al., 2015; Wen et al., 2017), altered right amygdala microstructure at birth (Rifkin-Graboi et al., 2013), lower frontal and parietal brain activation (Dawson et al., 2003), altered uncinate fasciculus connectivity in neonates (Lautarescu et al., 2020), lower right frontal white matter microstructure at 1-month-old (Dean et al., 2018), and significant right frontal cortical thinning in children (Sandman et al., 2015; Lebel et al., 2016).

Together, these findings suggest that maternal prenatal depression affects child behavior by impacting neurologic development. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated whether altered white matter mediates the relationship between prenatal depression and child behavior, which would provide more concrete evidence of a mechanism. The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between prenatal depression and child brain and behavior outcomes and investigate whether relationships between maternal depression and child behavior are mediated by alterations to structural connectivity, and if these effects are sex specific.

Materials and Methods

Participants

Fifty-four mothers and their children (24 female; 4.1 ± 0.8 years at MRI scan) were enrolled from an ongoing, prospective study (Kaplan et al., 2014). All participants provided informed consent, and this project was approved by the University of Calgary Health Research Ethics Board. Exclusion criteria for children included diagnosed neurologic disorders, history of head trauma, genetic disorders impacting cognitive or motor function, and contraindications to MRI. Two mothers were previously diagnosed with depression, one of whom was taking a moderate dose of a selective serotonin receptor inhibitor daily during pregnancy. Two women reported anxiety at enrollment; all women were screened. Prenatal medical comorbidities included celiac disease (n = 1), treated hypothyroidism (n = 5), and gestational diabetes (n = 5). For demographic information, see Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of mothers and children enrolled in the studya

Depressive symptoms

Maternal depressive symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) (Cox et al., 1987; Bergink et al., 2011). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms; scores ≥12 are usually consistent with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) (Cox et al., 1987). Women completed the EPDS up to three times in pregnancy (first trimester: 11.0 ± 2.8 weeks, n = 27; second trimester: 16.8 ± 2.2 weeks, n = 47; third trimester: 31.5 ± 1.1 weeks, n = 53) and at 3 months postpartum (11.5 ± 2.8 weeks, n = 54). Two women (7.4%) scored ≥12 on the EPDS in the first trimester, 4 women (8.5%) in the second trimester, 2 (3.8%) in the third trimester, and 5 (9.3%) postpartum. There were no significant associations between EPDS scores at each trimester.

Behavioral measures

Within 6 months of their MRI scan (average was 6 ± 4 d before the MRI), each child's parent (52 completed by mothers, 2 by fathers) completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (Rescorla, 2005), a 118-item measure of child behavior that includes composite scores for internalizing and externalizing behavior (Table 1). Two children had T scores >60 (considered “at risk”) in internalizing, and 6 children had scores >60 on externalizing. No children were >70 (considered clinically significant) in either domain. CBCL scoring is stable over time, with high reliability for up to 1 year (Frizzo et al., 2015).

Imaging

MRI data were collected at the Alberta Children Hospital on a GE 3T MR750w (General Electric) using a 32-channel head coil. Children were watching a movie of their choice during the scan; some (n = 3) fell asleep during the scan. Whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was collected using single-shot spin echo EPI with 30 diffusion encoding gradient directions at b = 750 s/mm2 and 5 images at b = 0 s/mm2, TR = 6750 ms, TE = 79 ms, and spatial resolution of 1.6 × 1.6 × 2.2 mm3 (resampled on scanner to 0.78 × 0.78 × 2.2 mm); total time was 4:03. DTI was collected as part of a larger protocol that also included T1-weighted anatomic imaging, passive viewing fMRI, and arterial spin labeling (Reynolds et al., 2020).

Image processing and analysis

Images were manually checked and volumes with artifacts or motion corruption were removed (Reynolds et al., 2019b). Participants with fewer than 22 volumes remaining were excluded from analysis. On average, participants had 32 ± 4 volumes remaining (of 35 original volumes; range 22-35). The average number of non–diffusion-weighted (b = 0 s/mm2) images removed was 0.2 ± 0.5 (range 0-2); the average number of diffusion-weighted images removed was 3.24 ± 3.3 (range 0-12). The number of volumes remaining was not significantly related to depressive symptoms or child behavior (all p > 0.4). Preprocessing in ExploreDTI (Leemans et al., 2009) included correction for signal drift, Gibbs ringing, eddy currents, and motion. Semiautomated deterministic streamline tractography (Reynolds et al., 2019a) was used to delineate the fornix, cingulum, uncinate fasciculus, and white matter connectivity from the amygdala to the PFC (Hay et al., 2019). A representative scan (a 3.68-year-old female) was identified using the tract-based spatial statistics nonlinear registration step in FSL for use as a target (Smith et al., 2006; for further details, see Reynolds et al., 2019b). All other subjects' fractional anisotropy (FA) maps were registered to this template. ROIs were drawn in the left and right hemispheres on the template and warped to fit each subject using the inverse registration parameters calculated from the previous step (Lebel et al., 2008a). Tractography was conducted in native space for each participant. Tracts were visually inspected to ensure accuracy, and spurious fibers were removed if necessary. Mean FA and mean diffusivity (MD) were extracted for each tract. Left and right tracts were examined separately for the amygdala tract, the uncinate fasciculus, and the cingulum; the fornix was analyzed as a whole, as it is a continuous tract across hemispheres. Tracts did not overlap and are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

White matter tracts examined in this study. A, Cingulum. B, Amygdala pathway. C, Fornix. D, Uncinate fasciculus. Tracts did not overlap.

Statistical analysis

Regression

Data met assumptions for regression (linearity, homoscedasticity, independence, normality). Brain measures (FA and MD for 7 different white matter tracts) were tested separately as dependent variables using linear regression, with maternal prenatal EPDS and an EPDS-sex interaction. Based on previously established relationships with maternal depressive symptoms and/or child brain, the following potential confounding variables were also included in the regression model: child age at MRI, child sex, gestational age at birth, birth weight, maternal age, maternal postsecondary education, and postnatal EPDS. Second and third trimester EPDS symptoms were tested separately; first trimester EPDS was not assessed because of low numbers. Results were corrected for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate (FDR) based on 7 white matter tracts (left and right amygdala pathway, left and right cingulum, left and right uncinate, and fornix), 2 values each (FA and MD), and 2 trimesters (second and third) for a total of 28 comparisons.

Tracts with significant (after correction) relationships with prenatal maternal depressive symptoms were then analyzed for relationships with behavioral scores. CBCL scores (Internalizing T score and Externalizing T score) were tested using linear regression with the brain measure and a brain-sex interaction. The same confounders as above were included in the model: child age at MRI, child sex, gestational age at birth, birth weight, maternal age, maternal postsecondary education, and postnatal EPDS. For both models, if interaction terms were not significant, they were removed from the model and the analysis was rerun. There was one outlying EPDS score; analysis was run without that person with no change in results. Similarly, the analysis was run with and without the individual on a selective serotonin receptor inhibitor, with no change in results.

Mediation

Tracts that were significantly related to both CBCL and EPDS scores were selected for mediation analysis. When sex interactions in the EPDS or CBCL regression models were significant, mediation was analyzed separately for males and females. Maternal depressive symptoms (EPDS) were entered as the independent variable (X), brain measures as the mediator (M), and CBCL scores as the outcome variable (Y). Nonparametric mediation tests were run on in-house Python using statsmodels version 0.11.1 with percentile bootstrapping, given the validation of this model on the non-normal distribution of mediating variables (Taylor and MacKinnon, 2012).

Results

FA and MD values were in the typical range for children this age: left amygdala FA (mean: 0.42 ± 0.01; range: 0.36–0.46), MD (0.88 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.03 × 10−3, 0.8 × 10−3- 1.0 × 10−3 mm2/s); right amygdala FA (0.42 ± 0.02, 0.35–0.46), MD (0.88 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.03 × 10−3, 0.8 × 10−3 to 1.0 × 10−3 mm2/s); left cingulum FA (0.42 ± 0.02, 0.36–0.48), MD (0.87 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.03 × 10−3, 0.8 × 10−3 to 0.9 × 10−3 mm2/s); right cingulum FA (0.40 ± 0.03, 0.35–0.44), MD (0.86 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.03 × 10−3, 0.8 × 10−3-0.9 × 10−3 mm2/s); left uncinate fasciculus FA (0.40 ± 0.02, 0.34–0.42), MD (0.93 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.03 × 10−3, 0.9 × 10−3-1.0 × 10−3 mm2/s); right uncinate fasciculus FA (0.38 ± 0.02, 0.34–0.43), MD (0.91 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.03 × 10−3, 0.9 × 10−3-1.0 × 10−3 mm2/s); and fornix FA (0.40 ± 0.02, 0.33–0.40), MD (1.42 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.1 × 10−3, 1.2 × 10−3-1.8 × 10−3 mm2/s).

Cingulum

Second trimester maternal EPDS scores had a positive main effect on left cingulum FA (F = 4.871, p = 0.033; Table 2), such that children of women with higher prenatal depressive symptoms tended to have higher FA. This result did not survive FDR correction (corrected p value: q = 0.143). There was a significant sex × third trimester EPDS interaction in right cingulum FA (F = 4.417, p = 0.042), such that higher maternal depressive symptoms were associated with lower FA in males; this did not survive FDR correction (q = 0.143). Third trimester EPDS had a main effect on left cingulum MD (F = 10.593, p = 0.002) and a sex × EPDS interaction (F = 5.725 p = 0.021). Specifically, higher maternal depressive symptoms were associated with higher MD in males (Fig. 2). The main effect survived FDR correction (q = 0.028).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Associations between prenatal depressive symptoms and white matter measuresa

Neither CBCL Externalizing nor Internalizing behavior was significantly associated with cingulum microstructure (Table 3).

Amygdala pathway

Third trimester maternal depressive symptoms had a positive main effect on right amygdala pathway MD (F = 11.568, p = 0.001) and left amygdala pathway MD (F = 4.319, p = 0.044) (Table 2; Fig. 2). Results for the right amygdala pathway, but not the left, survived FDR correction (q = 0.028 and q = 0.143, respectively).

The sex × brain interactions on CBCL Externalizing behavior were significant for the right amygdala pathway MD (F = 6.638, p = 0.015). Higher FA and lower MD in females were associated with higher externalizing behaviors, whereas lower FA and higher MD in males were associated with higher externalizing behavior (Table 3).

Uncinate fasciculus

Second trimester maternal depressive symptoms had a significant sex interaction on left and right uncinate MD (left: F = 9.911, p = 0.003; right: F = 4.249, p = 0.046) with males having a higher MD with higher maternal depressive symptoms (Table 2; Fig. 2). The positive relationship in the left uncinate, but not the right, survived multiple comparison correction (q = 0.028 and q = 0.143, respectively). Neither CBCL Externalizing nor Internalizing behavior was associated with uncinate microstructure (Table 3).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Relationships between white matter measures and prenatal maternal depressive symptoms. Black line indicates a main effect of Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) scores. Lines color-coded by sex indicate an interaction between EPDS and sex. A, Maternal depressive symptoms in the second trimester were positively associated with left uncinate fasciculus mean diffusivity (MD), with a significant sex interaction. Third trimester depressive symptoms were positively associated with (B) left cingulum MD and (C) right amygdala pathway MD. MD values are corrected for covariates.

Fornix

Fornix MD was positively associated with third trimester EPDS (F = 4.986, p = 0.031); this result did not survive multiple comparison (q = 0.143).

Mediation analysis

MD of the right amygdala significantly mediated the relationship between third trimester depressive symptoms and externalizing behavior in males (95% CI: [0.013, 2.05] Fig. 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Mean diffusivity (MD) of the right amygdala pathway significantly mediated the relationship between third trimester depressive symptoms and externalizing behavior in males. The 95% CI for the indirect relationship was [0.013, 2.05].

Discussion

Here, we show that prenatal maternal depressive symptoms are associated with altered limbic-prefrontal connectivity in young children. Furthermore, reduced structural connectivity between the amygdala and PFC mediated the relationship between maternal depressive symptoms and externalizing behavior in boys. These results suggest that reduced brain connectivity within the stress network is a mechanism via which maternal depression symptoms impact children's behavior.

We found weaker structural connectivity (lower FA and higher MD) in the amygdala pathway and cingulum associated with higher prenatal maternal depressive symptoms. Because FA increases and MD decreases with age (Yoshida et al., 2013), lower FA and/or higher MD values may indicate underdeveloped white matter in young children exposed to higher maternal prenatal depression symptoms, which may in turn predispose these children to dysregulated emotional states. Previous functional imaging studies have reported weaker amygdala-PFC functional connectivity in children born to more depressed mothers (Rifkin-Graboi et al., 2013). Similarly, reduced functional connectivity from the amygdala to the PFC was observed in 4- to 7-year-old children exposed to early life stress, and weaker connectivity was associated with more aggression and attention difficulties (Park et al., 2018). On the other hand, Qiu et al. (2015) found greater functional connectivity from the left amygdala to frontal cortex in neonates exposed to maternal prenatal depression (Qiu et al., 2015), indicating a potentially complex picture that could depend on factors, such as child age and sex.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Associations between child behavior and white matter measures in tracts that had significant relationships with maternal depressive symptomsa

The cingulum was also associated with prenatal depressive symptoms, consistent with a previous study that showed increased MD in the cingulum of school-aged year-old children exposed to prenatal maternal depressive symptoms (El Marroun et al., 2018). The cingulum is thought to be a structure susceptible to stress (Kim et al., 2006). Lower FA has been associated with dissociation and depression in young adults exposed to early life and prenatal stress (Choi et al., 2009; Marečková et al., 2019). The hippocampus receives serotonergic transmission from the midbrain raphe via the fornix and the cingulum (Patel et al., 1996), providing a potential means by which alterations in the cingulum could disrupt mood.

Higher MD in the left uncinate fasciculus was associated with greater severity of second trimester depressive symptoms. Higher MD, similar to lower FA, may indicate underdevelopment of this tract; this interestingly corresponds to other data showing reduced structural white matter connectivity of the uncincate in young adults who experienced early life stress (Hanson et al., 2015), decreased uncinate and cingulum FA in depressed adults (Bhatia et al., 2018), and decreased FA in the uncinate and cingulum of neonates exposed to prenatal anxiety (Rifkin-Graboi et al., 2015). While the uncinate was not associated with behavioral symptoms in these young children, it is possible that altered development within it may predispose children to mood disorders later on in life given data strongly suggesting uncinate involvement in MDD (Steffens et al., 2011; Carballedo et al., 2012; Bhatia et al., 2018; Deng et al., 2018).

Previous results from our laboratory in an overlapping sample suggested an accelerated pattern of development (lower diffusivity) in right frontal-temporal white matter in children exposed to greater second trimester depressive symptoms (Lebel et al., 2016). Indeed, other data have found that accelerated development may predispose children to psychiatric conditions later in life (Ono et al., 2008; Gee et al., 2013; Jalbrzikowski et al., 2017). Different results found here for third trimester may be a product of timing and brain areas examined. Indeed, in this study, we found a similar pattern of accelerated development (higher right cingulum FA in females) associated with second trimester maternal depressive symptoms, although this finding did not survive multiple comparison. These results suggest complex associations between the prenatal environment and children's brain development, where outcomes vary by timing of exposure and child age.

Altered structural connectivity similar to that observed here is associated with depression. Decreased amygdala-PFC connectivity is seen in adolescents with MDD (Cullen et al., 2014) and individuals with a familial history of depression (Luking et al., 2011). Decreased functional and structural connectivity between the amygdala and frontal cortex may indicate loss of inhibitory control and subsequent increased amygdala reactivity. This idea is supported by data showing reduced amygdala-PFC connectivity in adults associated with impaired emotional responses (Banks et al., 2007; Bjorkquist et al., 2016), anxiety and depression (Chen et al., 2008; Prater et al., 2013; Cheng et al., 2018), and increased aggression and attention problems in children (Park et al., 2018). Increased amygdala reactivity is also seen in adolescents with MDD (Perlman et al., 2012). Medications and psychotherapy that treat depression increase functional coupling between the amygdala and the striatum, thalamus, right frontal, and cingulate cortex (Chen et al., 2008), likely resulting in increased prefrontal inhibition and regulation of amygdala responsivity. It is important to note that, although data consistently show altered amygdala-PFC connectivity associated with mood and anxiety disorders, it is unclear whether that dysfunction is because of hypo- or hyper-connectivity (Jalbrzikowski et al., 2017). Our results support the theory of weaker top-down amygdala inhibition in children who experienced higher prenatal maternal depressive symptoms, providing evidence of a structural basis for previously observed deficits in functional connectivity.

Structural connectivity of the amygdala pathway mediated the relationship between maternal prenatal depressive symptoms and externalizing behavior in boys. Children whose mothers experienced prenatal depression consistently have higher externalizing symptoms (Oberlander et al., 2007), and thus alterations to amygdala-PFC structural connectivity may be a mechanism via which maternal depression impacts children's behavior (Pearson et al., 2013). Furthermore, this altered connectivity may increase children's risk for later mental health difficulties, as higher childhood externalizing symptoms are associated with later risk of suicidality, substance use, and psychopathology in adolescence and adulthood (Holtmann et al., 2011; Bellani et al., 2012). While this is the first study to show a mediating role of white matter connectivity, previous studies have shown a mediating role for gray matter in school-aged children. Right prefrontal cortical thickness mediates the relationship between maternal prenatal depressive symptoms and externalizing behavior in school-aged children (Sandman et al., 2015); in an overlapping sample, frontal cortical thickness in children mediated the relationship between prenatal maternal stress and adolescent depressive symptoms (Davis et al., 2020). Another study showed that amygdala volumes mediate the effect of prenatal maternal stress on boys' externalizing behavior at age 11 years (Jones et al., 2019), supporting the idea of sex-specific mediation effects on behavior.

The sexual differentiation suggests that boys are more vulnerable to maternal depressive symptoms. Some studies show that males experience more prominent age-related gray (De Bellis et al., 2001) and white matter changes compared with females (Simmonds et al., 2014; Reynolds et al., 2019b), although other studies suggest similar development trajectories across sexes (Lebel et al., 2008b; Muftuler et al., 2012). More rapid development in males may underlie increased susceptibility to environmental factors, such as prenatal depression. In childhood, males have a higher prevalence of depression (Merikangas et al., 2009), and male but not female children of postnatally depressed mothers have poorer cognitive function (Murray et al., 2010). Male infants exposed to prenatal depression have lower motor skills, higher generalized anxiety, and sleep problems (Gerardin et al., 2011). Thus, our data highlight that it may be underlying brain vulnerability in males that predisposes them to behavior problems. Of note, previous data in adults showed no moderating effect of sex on the relationship between prenatal stress during the first half of pregnancy and FA of the cingulum (Marečková et al., 2019). However, differences in exposure periods and the age of the offspring may account for the contrasting results.

The mechanisms through which prenatal maternal depression influences child brain structure are not well understood. Theories include dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and increased cortisol during pregnancy, genetic heritability of mood disorders, epigenetic modification of preexisting genes, nutrition, and inflammation (Weinstock, 2005). Maternal stress and depression during pregnancy increase cortisol and corticotropin releasing hormone, which initiates signaling in the HPA axis and can cross the placenta (Weinstock, 2005). Depression is associated with HPA axis dysregulation, with increased and prolonged stress responses and higher circulating glucocorticoids (Wong et al., 2000), which activate receptors in the child's brain and induce epigenetic changes (Weinstock, 2008). Animal research shows that even brief stress induces structural remodeling of the PFC, increasing emotional dysregulation and reducing fear extinction (Holmes and Wellman, 2009). Indeed, early life stress and HPA-axis function predict later psychopathology, potentially through connections with the amygdala-ventromedial PFC (Burghy et al., 2012); thus, prenatal HPA axis dysregulation and cortisol exposure may induce similar changes in amygdala projections to the PFC. Additionally, high stress in late pregnancy is associated with reduced uterine blood flow, suggesting that fetuses experience periods of hypoxia (Weinstock, 2008) that may impact brain development. MDD is highly heritable (Lohoff, 2010), and preexisting genetic vulnerability likely plays an important role in child vulnerability. Poor nutrition during pregnancy increases the risk of perinatal depression and poor child cognitive outcomes (Leung and Kaplan, 2009). Prenatal stress is associated with increased inflammation and cytokine activity, which may also impact child outcomes (Buitelaar et al., 2003). Higher depressive symptoms are associated with less social support (Ren et al., 2018), and decreased social support during pregnancy is associated with lower Apgar scores, worse labor progress, and increased prenatal and postpartum depression (Elsenbruch et al., 2007). Decreased social support and higher maternal depressive symptoms are also associated with a higher risk of developmental delay in children (Huang et al., 2014). It is likely a combination of biological and psychosocial factors that contribute to altered brain development and child outcomes.

This study has some limitations. Because of the timing of recruitment, limited first trimester depressive symptom data were available, and therefore were not analyzed. Greater severity of EPDS depressive symptom scores is associated with a diagnosis of depression, but the EPDS itself is not diagnostic. Therefore, we cannot say whether these women had a clinical diagnosis of depression. The relationships between even mild depressive symptoms and white matter and behavioral changes highlight the importance of even mild depressive symptoms for child outcomes. Furthermore, the EPDS only asks about the preceding 7 d, and thus may not represent symptoms across the entire trimester. The CBCL is a parent report measure, and therefore may be subject to parental bias and anxiety. Specific to the context of this study, women experiencing more depressive symptoms may answer the CBCL differently from many factors, including attachment and coping. Parental anxiety and social support contribute to child development and may play a role in our sample here. Brain development is known to be nonlinear in children (Reynolds et al., 2019b), although linear fits, as used here, can approximate trends over narrow age ranges. The age range in this study is 2.86–6 years; and so, it is possible that a linear fit is not ideal. Finally, our sample size was small for mediation, particularly in sex-specific analysis, which results in low power and may increase the FDR (Smaldino and McElreath, 2016). Thus, a significant mediation effect may also be present in girls but was not detected here. Future studies with larger sample sizes and wider age ranges may wish to include nonlinear age terms to better represent brain development.

In conclusion, we show altered structural connectivity of the amygdala in children of mothers with higher prenatal depressive symptoms, and these alterations mediate behavioral dysfunction in boys. These data present evidence of a structural basis for decreased top-down inhibition of the amygdala, resulting in altered behavior in children and may indicate structural abnormalities that predisposes children to develop affective disorders. Indeed, these data may help explain why children born to depressed mothers have a higher risk of developing depression themselves (Pearson et al., 2013). Additionally, we show sexual differentiation, suggesting that males have increased vulnerability to changes in early childhood. These findings suggest a need to improve prenatal care through programs that screen for perinatal depression and address prenatal depression as an important factor in future child health outcomes.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research IHD-134090, MOP-136797, and MOP-123535 and Postdoctoral Fellowship to J.E.R., Alberta Innovates–Health Solutions, the Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation, and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 5R21ES021295-03. R.E.H. was supported by a Mach-Gaensslen Foundation award. J.E.R. was supported by an Eyes High University of Calgary Postdoctoral Scholarship and the T. Chen Fong Postdoctoral Fellowship. M.N.G. was supported by a University of Calgary Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Studentship award and funding provided by the Department of Pediatrics. C.L. was supported (salary) by the Canada Research Chair program. We thank the members of the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition study team.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Catherine Lebel at clebel{at}ucalgary.ca

References

  1. ↵
    1. Banks SJ,
    2. Eddy KT,
    3. Angstadt M,
    4. Nathan PJ,
    5. Phan KL
    (2007) Amygdala–frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2:303–312. doi:10.1093/scan/nsm029 pmid:18985136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Barker ED,
    2. Jaffee SR,
    3. Uher R,
    4. Maughan B
    (2011) The contribution of prenatal and postnatal maternal anxiety and depression to child maladjustment. Depress Anxiety 28:696–702. doi:10.1002/da.20856 pmid:21769997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bellani M,
    2. Negri GA,
    3. Brambilla P
    (2012) The dysregulation profile in children and adolescents: a potential index for major psychopathology? Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 21:155–159. doi:10.1017/S2045796011000849 pmid:22789163
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bergink V,
    2. Kooistra L,
    3. Lambregtse-van den Berg MP,
    4. Wijnen H,
    5. Bunevicius R,
    6. van Baar A,
    7. Pop V
    (2011) Validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale during pregnancy. J Psychosom Res 70:385–389. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.008 pmid:21414460
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bhatia KD,
    2. Henderson LA,
    3. Hsu E,
    4. Yim M
    (2018) Reduced integrity of the uncinate fasciculus and cingulum in depression: a stem-by-stem analysis. J Affect Disord 235:220–228. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.055
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Bjorkquist OA,
    2. Olsen EK,
    3. Nelson BD,
    4. Herbener ES
    (2016) Altered amygdala-prefrontal connectivity during emotion perception in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 175:35–41. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.003 pmid:27083779
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Buitelaar JK,
    2. Huizink AC,
    3. Mulder EJ,
    4. de Medina PG,
    5. Visser GH
    (2003) Prenatal stress and cognitive development and temperament in infants. Neurobiol Aging 24:S53–S60. doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00050-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Burghy CA,
    2. Stodola DE,
    3. Ruttle PL,
    4. Molloy EK,
    5. Armstrong JM,
    6. Oler JA,
    7. Fox ME,
    8. Hayes AS,
    9. Kalin NH,
    10. Essex MJ,
    11. Davidson RJ,
    12. Birn RM
    (2012) Developmental pathways to amygdala-prefrontal function and internalizing symptoms in adolescence. Nat Neurosci 15:1736–1741. doi:10.1038/nn.3257 pmid:23143517
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Carballedo A,
    2. Amico F,
    3. Ugwu I,
    4. Fagan AJ,
    5. Fahey C,
    6. Morris D,
    7. Meaney JF,
    8. Leemans A,
    9. Frodl T
    (2012) Reduced fractional anisotropy in the uncinate fasciculus in patients with major depression carrying the met-allele of the Val66Met brain-derived neurotrophic factor genotype. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 159B:537–548. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32060 pmid:22585743
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Chen CH,
    2. Suckling J,
    3. Ooi C,
    4. Fu CH,
    5. Williams SC,
    6. Walsh ND,
    7. Mitterschiffthaler MT,
    8. Pich EM,
    9. Bullmore E
    (2008) Functional coupling of the amygdala in depressed patients treated with antidepressant medication. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1909–1918. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301593 pmid:17987064
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Cheng W,
    2. Rolls ET,
    3. Qiu J,
    4. Xie X,
    5. Lyu W,
    6. Li Y,
    7. Huang CC,
    8. Yang AC,
    9. Tsai SJ,
    10. Lyu F,
    11. Zhuang K,
    12. Lin CP,
    13. Xie P,
    14. Feng J
    (2018) Functional connectivity of the human amygdala in health and in depression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 13:557–568. doi:10.1093/scan/nsy032 pmid:29767786
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Choi J,
    2. Jeong B,
    3. Rohan ML,
    4. Polcari AM,
    5. Teicher MH
    (2009) Preliminary evidence for white matter tract abnormalities in young adults exposed to parental verbal abuse. Biol Psychiatry 65:227–234. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.06.022 pmid:18692174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Cox JL,
    2. Holden JM,
    3. Sagovsky R
    (1987) Detection of postnatal depression. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786. pmid:3651732
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Cullen KR,
    2. Westlund MK,
    3. Klimes-Dougan B,
    4. Mueller BA,
    5. Houri A,
    6. Eberly LE,
    7. Lim KO
    (2014) Abnormal amygdala resting-state functional connectivity in adolescent depression. JAMA Psychiatry 71:1138–1147. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1087
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Davis EP,
    2. Hankin BL,
    3. Glynn LM,
    4. Head K,
    5. Kim DJ,
    6. Sandman CA
    (2020) Prenatal maternal stress, child cortical thickness, and adolescent depressive symptoms. Child Dev 91:782–786. doi:10.1111/cdev.13252
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Dawson G,
    2. Ashman SB,
    3. Panagiotides H,
    4. Hessl D,
    5. Self J,
    6. Yamada E,
    7. Embry L
    (2003) Preschool outcomes of children of depressed mothers: role of maternal behavior, contextual risk, and children's brain activity. Child Dev 74:1158–1175. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00599 pmid:12938711
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. De Bellis MD,
    2. Keshavan MS,
    3. Beers SR,
    4. Hall J,
    5. Frustaci K,
    6. Masalehdan A,
    7. Noll J,
    8. Boring AM
    (2001) Sex differences in brain maturation during childhood and adolescence. Cereb Cortex 11:552–557. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.6.552 pmid:11375916
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Dean DC,
    2. Planalp EM,
    3. Wooten W,
    4. Kecskemeti SR,
    5. Adluru N,
    6. Schmidt CK,
    7. Frye C,
    8. Birn RM,
    9. Burghy CA,
    10. Schmidt NL,
    11. Styner MA,
    12. Short SJ,
    13. Kalin NH,
    14. Goldsmith HH,
    15. Alexander AL,
    16. Davidson RJ,
    17. Davidson RJ
    (2018) Association of prenatal maternal depression and anxiety symptoms with infant white matter microstructure. JAMA Pediatr 172:973–981. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2132 pmid:30177999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Deng F,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Huang H,
    4. Niu M,
    5. Zhong S,
    6. Zhao L,
    7. Qi Z,
    8. Wu X,
    9. Sun Y,
    10. Niu C,
    11. He Y,
    12. Huang L,
    13. Huang R
    (2018) Abnormal segments of right uncinate fasciculus and left anterior thalamic radiation in major and bipolar depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 81:340–349. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.09.006 pmid:28912043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Drevets WC,
    2. Price JL,
    3. Furey ML
    (2008) Brain structural and functional abnormalities in mood disorders: implications for neurocircuitry models of depression. Brain Struct Funct 213:93–118. doi:10.1007/s00429-008-0189-x pmid:18704495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Earls MF
    , Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health American Academy of Pediatrics (2010) Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal and postpartum depression into pediatric practice. Pediatrics 126:1032–1039. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2348 pmid:20974776
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. El Marroun H,
    2. Zou R,
    3. Muetzel RL,
    4. Jaddoe VW,
    5. Verhulst FC,
    6. White T,
    7. Tiemeier H
    (2018) Prenatal exposure to maternal and paternal depressive symptoms and white matter microstructure in children. Depress Anxiety 35:321–329. doi:10.1002/da.22722 pmid:29394520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Elsenbruch S,
    2. Benson S,
    3. Rücke M,
    4. Rose M,
    5. Dudenhausen J,
    6. Pincus-Knackstedt MK,
    7. Klapp BF,
    8. Arck PC
    (2007) Social support during pregnancy: effects on maternal depressive symptoms, smoking and pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod 22:869–877. doi:10.1093/humrep/del432 pmid:17110400
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Evans J,
    2. Melotti R,
    3. Heron J,
    4. Ramchandani P,
    5. Wiles N,
    6. Murray L,
    7. Stein A
    (2012) The timing of maternal depressive symptoms and child cognitive development: a longitudinal study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 53:632–640. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02513.x pmid:22211468
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Foster CE,
    2. Webster MC,
    3. Weissman MM,
    4. Pilowsky DJ,
    5. Wickramaratne PJ,
    6. Talati A,
    7. Rush AJ,
    8. Hughes CW,
    9. Garber J,
    10. Malloy E,
    11. Cerda G,
    12. Kornstein SG,
    13. Alpert JE,
    14. Wisniewski SR,
    15. Trivedi MH,
    16. Fava M,
    17. King CA
    (2008) Remission of maternal depression: relations to family functioning and youth internalizing and externalizing symptoms. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 37:714–724. doi:10.1080/15374410802359726 pmid:18991123
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Fowler CH,
    2. Miernicki ME,
    3. Rudolph KD,
    4. Telzer EH
    (2017) Disrupted amygdala-prefrontal connectivity during emotion regulation links stress-reactive rumination and adolescent depressive symptoms. Dev Cogn Neurosci 27:99–106. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.002 pmid:28946039
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Frizzo GB,
    2. Pedrini JR,
    3. Silva de Souza D,
    4. Bandeira DR,
    5. Borsa JC
    (2015) Reliability of Child Behavior Checklist and Teacher's Report Form in a sample of Brazilian children. Universitas Psychol 14:149–156.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Gee DG,
    2. Gabard-Durnam LJ,
    3. Flannery J,
    4. Goff B,
    5. Humphreys KL,
    6. Telzer EH,
    7. Hare TA,
    8. Bookheimer SY,
    9. Tottenham N
    (2013) Early developmental emergence of human amygdala-prefrontal connectivity after maternal deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:15638–15643. doi:10.1073/pnas.1307893110 pmid:24019460
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Gerardin P,
    2. Wendland J,
    3. Bodeau N,
    4. Galin A,
    5. Bialobos S,
    6. Tordjman S,
    7. Mazet P,
    8. Darbois Y,
    9. Nizard J,
    10. Dommergues M,
    11. Cohen D
    (2011) Depression during pregnancy: is the developmental impact earlier in boys? A prospective case-control study. J Clin Psychiatry 72:378–387. doi:10.4088/JCP.09m05724blu pmid:21208585
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Hanson JL,
    2. Knodt AR,
    3. Brigidi BD,
    4. Hariri AR
    (2015) Lower structural integrity of the uncinate fasciculus is associated with a history of child maltreatment and future psychological vulnerability to stress. Dev Psychopathol 27:1611–1619. doi:10.1017/S0954579415000978 pmid:26535947
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hay R,
    2. Reynolds J,
    3. Lebel C
    (2019) White matter tractography guide. In: Amygdala pathway. Available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7865186.v1.
  32. ↵
    1. Holmes A,
    2. Wellman CL
    (2009) Stress-induced prefrontal reorganization and executive dysfunction in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:773–783. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.11.005 pmid:19111570
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Holmes A,
    2. Lee PH,
    3. Hollinshead MO,
    4. Bakst L,
    5. Roffman JL,
    6. Smoller JW,
    7. Buckner RL
    (2012) Individual differences in amygdala-medial prefrontal anatomy link negative affect, impaired social functioning, and polygenic depression risk. J Neurosci 32:18087–18100. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2531-12.2012 pmid:23238724
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Holtmann M,
    2. Buchmann AF,
    3. Esser G,
    4. Schmidt MH,
    5. Banaschewski T,
    6. Laucht M
    (2011) The Child Behavior Checklist-Dysregulation Profile predicts substance use, suicidality, and functional impairment: a longitudinal analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52:139–147. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02309.x pmid:20854363
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Huang CY,
    2. Costeines J,
    3. Kaufman JS,
    4. Ayala C
    (2014) Parenting stress, social support, and depression for ethnic minority adolescent mothers: impact on child development. J Child Fam Stud 23:255–262. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9807-1 pmid:24653641
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Ibrahim K,
    2. Eilbott JA,
    3. Ventola P,
    4. He G,
    5. Pelphrey KA,
    6. McCarthy G,
    7. Sukhodolsky DG
    (2019) Reduced amygdala–prefrontal functional connectivity in children with autism spectrum disorder and co-occurring disruptive behavior. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 4:1031–1041. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.01.009 pmid:30979647
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Jalbrzikowski M,
    2. Larsen B,
    3. Hallquist MN,
    4. Foran W,
    5. Calabro F,
    6. Luna B
    (2017) Development of white matter microstructure and intrinsic functional connectivity between the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex: associations with anxiety and depression. Biol Psychiatry 82:511–521. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.01.008 pmid:28274468
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Jones SL,
    2. Dufoix R,
    3. Laplante DP,
    4. Elgbeili G,
    5. Patel R,
    6. Chakravarty MM,
    7. King S,
    8. Pruessner JC
    (2019) Larger amygdala volume mediates the association between prenatal maternal stress and higher levels of externalizing behaviors: sex specific effects in project ice storm. Front Hum Neurosci 13:144.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Josefsson A,
    2. Berg G,
    3. Nordin C,
    4. Sydsjö G
    (2001) Prevalence of depressive symptoms in late pregnancy and postpartum. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:251–255. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080003251.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Kaplan BJ,
    2. Giesbrecht GF,
    3. Leung BM,
    4. Field CJ,
    5. Dewey D,
    6. Bell RC,
    7. Manca DP,
    8. O'Beirne M,
    9. Johnston DW,
    10. Pop VJ,
    11. Singhal N,
    12. Gagnon L,
    13. Bernier FP,
    14. Eliasziw M,
    15. McCargar LJ,
    16. Kooistra L,
    17. Farmer A,
    18. Cantell M,
    19. Goonewardene L,
    20. Casey LM, et al
    . (2014) The Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) cohort study: rationale and methods. Matern Child Nutr 10:44–60. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00433.x pmid:22805165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Kim SJ,
    2. Jeong DU,
    3. Sim ME,
    4. Bae SC,
    5. Chung A,
    6. Kim MJ,
    7. Chang KH,
    8. Ryu J,
    9. Renshaw PF,
    10. Lyoo IK
    (2006) Asymmetrically altered integrity of cingulum bundle in posttraumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychobiology 54:120–125. doi:10.1159/000098262 pmid:17199097
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Lautarescu A,
    2. Pecheva D,
    3. Nosarti C,
    4. Nihouarn J,
    5. Zhang H,
    6. Victor S,
    7. Craig M,
    8. Edwards AD,
    9. Counsell SJ
    (2020) Maternal prenatal stress is associated with altered uncinate fasciculus microstructure in premature neonates. Biol Psychiatry 87:559–569. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.08.010 pmid:31604519
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Lebel C,
    2. Rasmussen C,
    3. Wyper K,
    4. Walker L,
    5. Andrew G,
    6. Yager J,
    7. Beaulieu C
    (2008a) Brain diffusion abnormalities in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32:1732–1740. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00750.x pmid:18671811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Lebel C,
    2. Walker L,
    3. Leemans A,
    4. Phillips L,
    5. Beaulieu C
    (2008b) Microstructural maturation of the human brain from childhood to adulthood. Neuroimage 40:1044–1055. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.053 pmid:18295509
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Lebel C,
    2. Walton M,
    3. Letourneau N,
    4. Giesbrecht GF,
    5. Kaplan BJ,
    6. Dewey D
    (2016) Archival report prepartum and postpartum maternal depressive symptoms are related to children's brain structure in preschool. Biol Psychiatry 80:859–868. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.12.004 pmid:26822800
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Leemans A,
    2. Jeurissen B,
    3. Sijbers J,
    4. Jones DK
    (2009) ExploreDTI: A Graphical Toolbox for Processing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Diffusion MR Data, Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii.
  47. ↵
    1. Leung BM,
    2. Kaplan BJ
    (2009) Perinatal depression: prevalence, risks, and the nutrition link—a review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc 109:1566–1575. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2009.06.368 pmid:19699836
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Lohoff FW
    (2010) Overview of the genetics of major depressive disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep 12:539–546. pmid:20848240
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Luking KR,
    2. Repovs G,
    3. Belden AC,
    4. Gaffrey MS,
    5. Botteron KN,
    6. Luby JL,
    7. Barch DM
    (2011) Functional connectivity of the amygdala in early-childhood-onset depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 50:1027–1041.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2011.07.019 pmid:21961777
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Malykhin NV,
    2. Carter R,
    3. Hegadoren KM,
    4. Seres P,
    5. Coupland NJ
    (2012) Fronto-limbic volumetric changes in major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 136:1104–1113. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.038 pmid:22134041
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Marečková K,
    2. Klasnja A,
    3. Andrýsková L,
    4. Brázdil M,
    5. Paus T
    (2019) Developmental origins of depression-related white matter properties: findings from a prenatal birth cohort. Hum Brain Mapp 40:1155–1163. doi:10.1002/hbm.24435
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    1. Merikangas KR,
    2. Nakamura EF,
    3. Kessler RC
    (2009) Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 11:7–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Muftuler LT,
    2. Davis EP,
    3. Buss C,
    4. Solodkin A,
    5. Su MY,
    6. Head KM,
    7. Hasso AN,
    8. Sandman CA
    (2012) Development of white matter pathways in typically developing preadolescent children. Brain Res 1466:33–43. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.035 pmid:22634375
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Murray L,
    2. Arteche A,
    3. Fearon P,
    4. Halligan S,
    5. Croudace T,
    6. Cooper P
    (2010) The effects of maternal postnatal depression and child sex on academic performance at age 16 years: a developmental approach. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51:1150–1159. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02259.x pmid:20840504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Noordermeer SD,
    2. Luman M,
    3. Oosterlaan J
    (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging in oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD) taking attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) into account. Neuropsychol Rev 26:44–72. doi:10.1007/s11065-015-9315-8 pmid:26846227
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Oberlander TF,
    2. Reebye P,
    3. Misri S,
    4. Papsdorf M,
    5. Kim J,
    6. Grunau RE
    (2007) Externalizing and attentional behaviors in children of depressed mothers treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant during pregnancy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161:22–29. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.1.22 pmid:17199063
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Ono M,
    2. Kikusui T,
    3. Sasaki N,
    4. Ichikawa M,
    5. Mori Y,
    6. Murakami-Murofushi K
    (2008) Early weaning induces anxiety and precocious myelination in the anterior part of the basolateral amygdala of male Balb/c mice. Neuroscience 156:1103–1110. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.078 pmid:18790016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Park AT,
    2. Leonard JA,
    3. Saxler PK,
    4. Cyr AB,
    5. Gabrieli JD,
    6. Mackey AP
    (2018) Amygdala–medial prefrontal cortex connectivity relates to stress and mental health in early childhood. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 13:430–439. doi:10.1093/scan/nsy017 pmid:29522160
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Patel TD,
    2. Azmitia EC,
    3. Zhou FC
    (1996) Increased 5-HT1A receptor immunoreactivity in the rat hippocampus following 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine lesions in the cingulum bundle and fimbria-fornix. Behav Brain Res 73:319–323. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(96)00122-2 pmid:8788527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Pearson RM,
    2. Evans J,
    3. Kounali D,
    4. Lewis G,
    5. Heron J,
    6. Ramchandani PG,
    7. O'Connor TG,
    8. Stein A
    (2013) Maternal depression during pregnancy and the postnatal period. JAMA Psychiatry 70:1312–1319. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2163 pmid:24108418
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Perlman SB,
    2. Almeida JR,
    3. Kronhaus DM,
    4. Versace A,
    5. Labarbara EJ,
    6. Klein CR,
    7. Phillips ML
    (2012) Amygdala activity and prefrontal cortex-amygdala effective connectivity to emerging emotional faces distinguish remitted and depressed mood states in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 14:162–174. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00999.x pmid:22420592
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Prater KE,
    2. Hosanagar A,
    3. Klumpp H,
    4. Angstadt M,
    5. Luan Phan K
    (2013) Aberrant amygdala-frontal cortex connectivity during perception of fearful faces and at rest in generalized social anxiety discorder. Depress Anxiety 30:234–241. doi:10.1002/da.22014 pmid:23184639
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Price JL,
    2. Drevets WC
    (2010) Neurocircuitry of mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:192–216. pmid:19693001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Qiu A,
    2. Anh TT,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Broekman BF,
    6. Kwek K,
    7. Saw S,
    8. Chong Y,
    9. Gluckman PD,
    10. Fortier MV
    (2015) Prenatal maternal depression alters amygdala functional connectivity in 6-month-old infants. Transl Psychiatry 5:e508.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Rajmohan V,
    2. Mohandas E
    (2007) The limbic system. Indian J Psychiatry 49:132–139. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.33264 pmid:20711399
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Ren P,
    2. Qin X,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Zhang R
    (2018) Is social support a cause or consequence of depression? A longitudinal study of adolescents. Front Psychol 9:1634.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Rescorla LA
    (2005) Assessment of young children using the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA). Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 11:226–237. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20071 pmid:16161094
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Reynolds J,
    2. Grohs M,
    3. Lebel C
    (2019a) White matter tractography guides. FigShare. Available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7603271.v1.
  69. ↵
    1. Reynolds JE,
    2. Grohs MN,
    3. Dewey D,
    4. Lebel C
    (2019b) Global and regional white matter development in early childhood. Neuroimage 196:49–58. pmid:30959194
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Reynolds JE,
    2. Long X,
    3. Paniukov D,
    4. Bagshawe M,
    5. Lebel C
    (2020) Calgary Preschool magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dataset. Data Brief 29:105224. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105224 pmid:32071993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Rifkin-Graboi A,
    2. Bai J,
    3. Chen H,
    4. Hameed WB,
    5. Sim LW,
    6. Tint MT,
    7. Leutscher-Broekman B,
    8. Chong YS,
    9. Gluckman PD,
    10. Fortier MV,
    11. Meaney MJ,
    12. Qiu A
    (2013) Prenatal maternal depression associates with microstructure of right amygdala in neonates at birth. Biol Psychiatry 74:837–844. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.06.019 pmid:23968960
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Rifkin-Graboi A,
    2. Meaney MJ,
    3. Chen H,
    4. Bai J,
    5. Hameed WB,
    6. Tint MT,
    7. Broekman BF,
    8. Chong YS,
    9. Gluckman PD,
    10. Fortier MV,
    11. Qiu A
    (2015) Antenatal maternal anxiety predicts variations in neural structures implicated in anxiety disorders in newborns. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 54:313–321.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2015.01.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Sandman CA,
    2. Buss C,
    3. Head K,
    4. Davis EP
    (2015) Fetal exposure to maternal depressive symptoms is associated with cortical thickness in late childhood. Biol Psychiatry 77:324–334. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.06.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Sheikh HI,
    2. Joanisse MF,
    3. Mackrell SM,
    4. Kryski KR,
    5. Smith HJ,
    6. Singh SM,
    7. Hayden EP
    (2014) Links between white matter microstructure and cortisol reactivity to stress in early childhood: evidence for moderation by parenting. Neuroimage Clin 6:77–85. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.013
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. ↵
    1. Simmonds DJ,
    2. Hallquist MN,
    3. Asato M,
    4. Luna B
    (2014) Developmental stages and sex differences of white matter and behavioral development through adolescence: a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. Neuroimage 92:356–368. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.044 pmid:24384150
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Smaldino PE,
    2. McElreath R
    (2016) The natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci 3:160384. doi:10.1098/rsos.160384 pmid:27703703
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Johansen-Berg H,
    4. Rueckert D,
    5. Nichols TE,
    6. Mackay CE,
    7. Watkins KE,
    8. Ciccarelli O,
    9. Cader MZ,
    10. Matthews PM,
    11. Behrens TE
    (2006) Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 31:1487–1505. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 pmid:16624579
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Steffens DC,
    2. Taylor WD,
    3. Denny KL,
    4. Bergman SR,
    5. Wang L
    (2011) Structural integrity of the uncinate fasciculus and resting state functional connectivity of the ventral prefrontal cortex in late life depression. PLoS One 6:e22697. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022697
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Taylor AB,
    2. MacKinnon DP
    (2012) Four applications of permutation methods to testing a single-mediator model. Behav Res Methods 44:806–844. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0181-x pmid:22311738
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. van Eijndhoven P,
    2. van Wingen G,
    3. van Oijen K,
    4. Rijpkema M,
    5. Goraj B,
    6. Jan Verkes R,
    7. Oude Voshaar R,
    8. Fernández G,
    9. Buitelaar J,
    10. Tendolkar I
    (2009) Amygdala volume marks the acute state in the early course of depression. Biol Psychiatry 65:812–818. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.027 pmid:19028381
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Weinstock M
    (2005) The potential influence of maternal stress hormones on development and mental health of the offspring. Brain Behav Immun 19:296–308. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2004.09.006 pmid:15944068
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Weinstock M
    (2008) The long-term behavioural consequences of prenatal stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:1073–1086
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Wen DJ,
    2. Poh JS,
    3. Ni SN,
    4. Chong YS,
    5. Chen H,
    6. Kwek K,
    7. Shek LP,
    8. Gluckman PD,
    9. Fortier MV,
    10. Meaney MJ,
    11. Qiu A
    (2017) Influences of prenatal and postnatal maternal depression on amygdala volume and microstructure in young children. Transl Psychiatry 7:e1103. doi:10.1038/tp.2017.74
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  84. ↵
    1. Wong ML,
    2. Kling MA,
    3. Munson PJ,
    4. Listwak S,
    5. Licinio J,
    6. Prolo P,
    7. Karp B,
    8. McCutcheon IE,
    9. Geracioti TD,
    10. DeBellis MD,
    11. Rice KC,
    12. Goldstein DS,
    13. Veldhuis JD,
    14. Chrousos GP,
    15. Oldfield EH,
    16. McCann SM,
    17. Gold PW
    (2000) Pronounced and sustained central hypernoradrenergic function in major depression with melancholic features: relation to hypercortisolism and corticotropin-releasing hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:325–330. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.1.325 pmid:10618417
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. ↵
    1. Yoshida S,
    2. Oishi K,
    3. Faria AV,
    4. Mori S
    (2013) Diffusion tensor imaging of normal brain development. Pediatr Radiol 43:15–27. doi:10.1007/s00247-012-2496-x pmid:23288475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 40 (36)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 40, Issue 36
2 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys
Rebecca E. Hay, Jess E. Reynolds, Melody N. Grohs, Dmitrii Paniukov, Gerald F. Giesbrecht, Nicole Letourneau, Deborah Dewey, Catherine Lebel
Journal of Neuroscience 2 September 2020, 40 (36) 6969-6977; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0481-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys
Rebecca E. Hay, Jess E. Reynolds, Melody N. Grohs, Dmitrii Paniukov, Gerald F. Giesbrecht, Nicole Letourneau, Deborah Dewey, Catherine Lebel
Journal of Neuroscience 2 September 2020, 40 (36) 6969-6977; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0481-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • amygdala
  • brain development
  • depression
  • externalizing behavior
  • MRI
  • pregnancy

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys Response
    Rebecca E Hay
    Published on: 10 December 2020
  • RE:Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys
    Ali Saffet Gonul, Aslıhan Demir and Yigit Erdogan
    Published on: 02 November 2020
  • Published on: (10 December 2020)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys Response
    RE: Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys Response
    • Rebecca E Hay, Resident Physician, University of Calgary

    We thank Authors Demir, Erdogan, Gonul for their response to our article. We are happy to address the points brought forward.

    The purpose of our study was to examine a range of depressive symptoms in pregnant women, not to examine only women with a diagnosis of depression. This approach is better for understanding individual differences across the spectrum, and for highlighting whether sub-threshold symptoms are important. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a valid assessment of depressive symptoms both prenatally and postnatally, and EPDS scores ≥12 are consistent with a diagnosis of depression (Cox et al., 1987). The data to which you refer (n=2 in the first trimester; n=4 in the second trimester; n=2 in the third trimester; n=5 postpartum) are women who scored ≥ 12 on the EPDS. There is some overlap between time points, but not all women who scored ≥ 12 consistently scored ≥ 12 across all trimesters; the subject pool is the same, and women were followed longitudinally. We provided this information for context; however, the purpose of this study was always to examine the full spectrum of depressive symptoms relative to children’s brain structure and behaviour. As an example of the importance of including a spectrum, evidence shows that subclinical depression (e.g. EPDS >9) in mothers predicts behavioural problems in children (Giallo et al., 2015; Kingston et al., 2018), including in the APrON study, from which our sample was drawn (Letourneau e...

    Show More

    We thank Authors Demir, Erdogan, Gonul for their response to our article. We are happy to address the points brought forward.

    The purpose of our study was to examine a range of depressive symptoms in pregnant women, not to examine only women with a diagnosis of depression. This approach is better for understanding individual differences across the spectrum, and for highlighting whether sub-threshold symptoms are important. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a valid assessment of depressive symptoms both prenatally and postnatally, and EPDS scores ≥12 are consistent with a diagnosis of depression (Cox et al., 1987). The data to which you refer (n=2 in the first trimester; n=4 in the second trimester; n=2 in the third trimester; n=5 postpartum) are women who scored ≥ 12 on the EPDS. There is some overlap between time points, but not all women who scored ≥ 12 consistently scored ≥ 12 across all trimesters; the subject pool is the same, and women were followed longitudinally. We provided this information for context; however, the purpose of this study was always to examine the full spectrum of depressive symptoms relative to children’s brain structure and behaviour. As an example of the importance of including a spectrum, evidence shows that subclinical depression (e.g. EPDS >9) in mothers predicts behavioural problems in children (Giallo et al., 2015; Kingston et al., 2018), including in the APrON study, from which our sample was drawn (Letourneau et al., 2019). Taken together, we believe our sample represents typical childbearing women with a range of symptoms of postpartum depression, from none, to subclinical, to clinical. We believe our results are important because they show that even mild depressive symptoms are associated with brain structure in young children, suggesting that women should be supported in pregnancy even if they do not meet clinical cut-offs for depression.

    Women with prior clinical diagnoses of depression were included in the study, as was a woman taking an SSRI. We were interested in depressive symptoms during pregnancy, regardless of prior history. We conducted follow-up analyses to ensure that the results remained significant even without the woman taking an SSRI, and they did. With regard to the lack of women with other psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, this is an important strength of the study, not a weakness. Schizophrenia and depression have markedly different neurocircuitry and pathophysiology (Webster, 2003; Meisenzahl et al., 2010, Johnston-Wilson et al., 2000), and exposure to these during pregnancy may have substantially different effects on the developing fetal brain. The inclusion of women with psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia in our study would have made it difficult to study the effects of depressive symptoms on child brain development and behaviour.

    We agree that the metrics derived from diffusion imaging are nonspecific; there is a large literature on this (Beaulieu, 2002). This limitation exists for all studies using these metrics, and is the reason that we make no claims in the manuscript about these differences reflecting a specific change (e.g., myelin). We agree that postnatal environment may influence brain structure in these children, and a limitation of the current study is that we did not control for parenting and other aspects of the postnatal environment (see Discussion, paragraph 10).

    We believe our study provides a valuable contribution to the literature using the appropriate tools and techniques to assess prenatal and postnatal depressive symptoms, children’s brain structure, and children’s behaviour. We look forward to more research in this important area that will overcome some of the limitations of our study and further our understanding of maternal mental health and children’s outcomes.

    Thank you for your thoughtful consideration, we are pleased this paper stimulated such discussion. We hope with the clarifications above, we can continue to engage in informed and thoughtful discourse.

    Sincerely,

    Rebecca E. Hay, MD
    Jess E. Reynolds, PhD
    Gerald F. Giesbrecht, PhD
    Nicole Letourneau, PhD
    Deborah Dewey, PhD
    Catherine Lebel, PhD

    References:

    Beaulieu C (2002) The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system - A technical review. NMR Biomed 15:435–455 Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12489094

    Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of Postnatal Depression. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786 Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007125000214712/type...

    Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T (2005) Perinatal depression: A systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 106:1071–1083 Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16260528/

    Giallo R, Woolhouse H, Gartland D, Hiscock H, Brown S (2015) The emotional–behavioural functioning of children exposed to maternal depressive symptoms across pregnancy and early childhood: a prospective Australian pregnancy cohort study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 24:1233–1244 Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00787-014-0672-2

    Kingston D, Kehler H, Austin MP, Mughal MK, Wajid A, Vermeyden L, Benzies K, Brown S, Stuart S, Giallo R (2018) Trajectories of maternal depressive symptoms during pregnancy and the first 12 months postpartum and child externalizing and internalizing behavior at three years. PLoS One 13 Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29652937/

    Letourneau N, Leung B, Ntanda H, Dewey D, Deane AJ, Giesbrecht GF (2019) Maternal and paternal perinatal depressive symptoms associate with 2-and 3-year-old children’s behaviour: Findings from the APrON longitudinal study. BMC Pediatr 19 Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31722682/

    Meisenzahl EM, Seifert D, Bottlender R, Teipel S, Zetzsche T, Jäger M, Koutsouleris N, Schmitt G, Scheuerecker J, Burgermeister B, Hampel H, Rupprecht T, Born C, Reiser M, Möller HJ, Frodl T (2010) Differences in hippocampal volume between major depression and schizophrenia: A comparative neuroimaging study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 260:127–137 Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00406-009-0023-3

    Webster RA (2003) Neurotransmitters, Drugs and Brain Function . London, UK: Wiley & Sons. Available at: https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GDsYNq8mnnwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq... schizophrenia depression&f=false

    Johnston-Wilson NL, Sims CD, Hofmann JP, Anderson L, Shore AD, Yolken RH (2000) Disease-specific alterations in frontal cortex brain proteins in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Molecular Psychiatry 5 142-149 Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/4000696

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (2 November 2020)
    Page navigation anchor for RE:Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys
    RE:Amygdala-Prefrontal Structural Connectivity Mediates the Relationship between Prenatal Depression and Behavior in Preschool Boys
    • Ali Saffet Gonul, Academic, Ege University School of Medicine SoCAT Lab
    • Other Contributors:
      • Aslıhan Demir
      • Yigit Erdogan

    Hay et al. present interesting data on the relationship between prenatal depression, structural connectivity, and behaviors in preschool boys. However, we have serious concerns about the sample representing the women with prenatal depression. According to the article, women with depressive symptoms included 2 (7.4%) in the first trimester, 4 (8.5%) in the second trimester, and 2 (3.8%) in the third trimester. These numbers were far lower than expected prenatal depression prevalence indicated in the introduction (up to 20%) and cannot be used to infer the neurobiological changes associated with prenatal depression. Thus, the sample was insufficient to test the hypothesis of the article. Furthermore, the article's title and the abstract mislead clinicians because the sample does not represent the patients' diagnoses as prenatal depression in clinical practice.

    The diagnosis of depression is another problem. The authors used only the Edinburg Postnatal Depression Scale, which is useful for screening but has low specificity for prenatal depression [1]. Furthermore, it was reported that two women had the diagnoses of depression before the pregnancy, and it is not clear if the numbers in each trimester had included these two women. We had no clue from the articles that the women who were previously diagnosed in one trimester were included in the other, which might reduce the depressed mother percentage even further in the sample. We think that a lack of mothe...

    Show More

    Hay et al. present interesting data on the relationship between prenatal depression, structural connectivity, and behaviors in preschool boys. However, we have serious concerns about the sample representing the women with prenatal depression. According to the article, women with depressive symptoms included 2 (7.4%) in the first trimester, 4 (8.5%) in the second trimester, and 2 (3.8%) in the third trimester. These numbers were far lower than expected prenatal depression prevalence indicated in the introduction (up to 20%) and cannot be used to infer the neurobiological changes associated with prenatal depression. Thus, the sample was insufficient to test the hypothesis of the article. Furthermore, the article's title and the abstract mislead clinicians because the sample does not represent the patients' diagnoses as prenatal depression in clinical practice.

    The diagnosis of depression is another problem. The authors used only the Edinburg Postnatal Depression Scale, which is useful for screening but has low specificity for prenatal depression [1]. Furthermore, it was reported that two women had the diagnoses of depression before the pregnancy, and it is not clear if the numbers in each trimester had included these two women. We had no clue from the articles that the women who were previously diagnosed in one trimester were included in the other, which might reduce the depressed mother percentage even further in the sample. We think that a lack of mothers with other psychiatric diseases (e.g., schizophrenia), which might influence their children's brain connectivity, is another methodological issue in the study [2].

    The MRI metrics derived from DTI, such as FA, MD, are informative, but the results are nonspecific [3]. They reflect extensive tissue microstructure changes in the brain, which might be related to any developmental challenge [4]. Thus, any adverse event might lead to the observed alterations in the children. It is not uncommon that children of mothers with prenatal depression have early childhood adversity like neglect [5]. However, we could not see any data about early adverse life events in children to eliminate these types of confounding factors.

    Creating a correct sample pool and methodological approach is the most critical point in scientific research. Unfortunately, in Hay and colleagues' paper, the study sample, reaching depression diagnosis and controlling confounding factors, limits the findings' significance.

    Aslihan Demir, MD
    Yigit Erdogan, MSc
    Ali Saffet Gonul, MD

    References

    [1] Kozinszky Z, Dudas RB. Validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for the antenatal period. J Affect Disord 2015.doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.044.
    [2] Cannon TD, Mednick SA, Parnas J. Genetic and Perinatal Determinants of Structural Brain Deficits in Schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810100025005.
    [3] Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system - A technical review. NMR Biomed 2002.doi:10.1002/nbm.782.
    [4] Cascio CJ, Gerig G, Piven J. Diffusion tensor imaging: Application to the study of the developing brain. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007.doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000246064.93200.e8.
    [5] Depression in pregnant women and mothers: How children are affected. Paediatr Child Health 2004.doi:10.1093/pch/9.8.584.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Whole-Brain Wiring Diagram of Oxytocin System in Adult Mice
  • Microglial Tmem59 Deficiency Impairs Phagocytosis of Synapse and Leads to Autism-Like Behaviors in Mice
  • The Role of Visual Experience in Individual Differences of Brain Connectivity
Show more Research Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Whole-Brain Wiring Diagram of Oxytocin System in Adult Mice
  • Microglial Tmem59 Deficiency Impairs Phagocytosis of Synapse and Leads to Autism-Like Behaviors in Mice
  • The Role of Visual Experience in Individual Differences of Brain Connectivity
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.