Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Ventral Hippocampus Projections to Prelimbic Cortex Support Contextual Fear Memory

Alexandra O. Cohen and Heidi C. Meyer
Journal of Neuroscience 28 October 2020, 40 (44) 8410-8412; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1285-20.2020
Alexandra O. Cohen
1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heidi C. Meyer
2Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Learning from and remembering salient features of the environment is essential for survival. Fear conditioning is a well studied experimental model that can be used to delineate the neural mechanisms through which cued and contextual components of associative learning contribute to fear memory. During cued fear conditioning, a conditioned stimulus (CS), such as a sound, comes to elicit a fear response after it is repeatedly paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US), such as an electric shock. During contextual fear conditioning, the surrounding environment where a US is encountered (with or without a CS) comes to elicit a fear response. Whereas associating a specific CS with a US during cued fear conditioning relies on the amygdala, processing spatial and temporal context information during various forms of fear learning is thought to rely on the hippocampus (Maren et al., 2013). The ventral hippocampus (VH) also encodes salient information related to emotion and stress, including aversive stimuli used in fear conditioning (Fanselow and Dong, 2010). VH sends glutamatergic projections to the prelimbic (PL) region of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC; Parent et al., 2010), another area critical for the acquisition and expression of fear responses in environments where timing and context contribute to the prediction of threatening events (Gilmartin et al., 2014). Temporal complexity is added to associative learning in trace fear conditioning, where the CS and US are separated by a time, or “trace,” interval. Disrupting local hippocampal and PL activity, individually, impairs the acquisition of trace fear conditioning (Raybuck and Lattal, 2014), suggesting that these brain areas support trace fear learning.

The hypothesis that VH–PL circuitry contributes to trace-cued and contextual fear conditioning more broadly was tested in a recent study by Twining et al. (2020). The authors optogenetically silenced VH inputs to PL during trace fear conditioning trials, starting 20 s before the auditory CS and continuing through the trace interval until 20 s after the shock US. Importantly, each day of conditioning and testing began with a baseline period (6 m) that provided additional time for animals to encode the context and allowed the authors to examine contextual fear memory. Retention of cued fear was examined in a separate, novel context before conditioning on each training day.

Contrary to the authors' hypothesis, silencing VH–PL projections during trace fear conditioning trials did not impair learning: animals in which projections were silenced froze as much as controls in response to the auditory CS during both training and testing. In contrast, during context retention tests, animals in which VH–PL projections had been silenced showed significantly less fear expression than controls in the context where they were shocked. Notably, however, all animals froze more after training than before, yet fear expression emerged later in the session—and to a lesser extent—in animals in which VH–PL projections had been silenced during conditioning. Thus, silencing VH–PL communication during conditioning diminished, but did not eliminate, contextual fear. Together, the findings indicate that VH inputs play a role in updating PL with contextual information, but do not play a role in trace-cued fear learning. Contextual learning can occur, albeit more slowly, via other pathways. This slower learning might depend on contextual information encoded outside the silencing interval, which is consistent with previous work showing that exposure to a context preceding any aversive association can strongly influence contextual fear learning (Fanselow, 1990).

Twining et al. (2020) next investigated whether blocking VH–PL communication during the shock alone, rather than the whole trial, would induce similar contextual learning deficits. The authors silenced VH–PL communication starting 1 s before the shock and continuing until 20 s after shock delivery, leaving communication during the tone presentation and most of the trace period intact. Silencing solely during the shock epoch was insufficient to decrease fear expression, indicating that VH input to PL during the 20 s lead up to the shock was key for subsequent rapid expression of contextual fear. This result suggests that the relay of contextual information from VH to PL during a relatively brief period before shock delivery is critical for forming contextual fear memory.

To further probe the mechanism underlying the contextual fear memory deficit produced by silencing VH–PL circuitry, the authors silenced VH–PL projections during retrieval both in animals that had experienced silencing during conditioning and in control animals. When VH–PL projections were silenced during both conditioning and contextual test trials, contextual fear expression was restored. Furthermore, silencing VH–PL projections solely during retrieval did not influence fear expression: control animals still froze in context tests. These results suggest that the brain state formed by silencing VH–PL projections during conditioning becomes an important factor in predicting the shock. Thus, when this encoding state is recapitulated by silencing VH–PL projections during testing, fear expression occurs.

Slow contextual learning in the absence of VH–PL communication suggests that compensatory brain mechanisms encode an intact yet weaker contextual fear memory. The authors propose that VH–amygdala connections contribute to context encoding and that the thalamic nucleus reuniens and its projections to PL might facilitate contextual memory formation in the absence of hippocampal input. Another possible compensatory mechanism may originate in the dorsal hippocampus (DH). Previous research suggests distinct functional roles for VH and DH in rodents, with VH facilitating emotional and motivational behaviors and DH supporting general cognitive functions (Fanselow and Dong, 2010). Despite these putative functional differences, chemogenetic silencing of DH–PL communication blocks enhancements in fear memory that occur after re-exposure to a fear context, suggesting that DH can relay contextual information to PL (Ye et al., 2017). Retrosplenial cortex (RSC) may provide another pathway for contextual fear processing via connections with both the hippocampus and mPFC. Indeed, Kwapis et al. (2015) found that blocking protein synthesis in RSC before trace fear conditioning disrupted contextual fear memory formation. Thus, in the absence of VH–PL communication, it is possible that DH or RSC contributes to weaker, delayed expression of contextual fear.

If VH–PL projections serve as the default pathway for providing contextual information relevant to threats, the return of VH–PL communication during retrieval in rats with silenced VH–PL communication during acquisition might override contextual fear memories formed by the alternative circuitry described above. A similar mechanism allows VH–PL communication to override inhibitory learning about a fear cue during extinction when the animal is re-exposed to the original fear context (Wang et al., 2016). The existence of multiple neural mechanisms that can subserve motivationally salient learning and memory likely provides flexibility that allows an animal to respond appropriately to threats across variable and complex environments.

The findings of Twining et al. (2020) add to the growing body of work that highlights the importance of VH for complex learning processes. VH has been implicated in many associative learning processes including fear acquisition (Maren and Holt, 2004; Sierra-Mercado et al., 2011), conditioned inhibition (Meyer et al., 2019), and context-dependent learning and retrieval (Komorowski et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016). Twining et al. (2020) provide evidence that VH continuously updates PL with information about contextual state, and that suppressing this communication during learning causes deficits in contextual fear memory expression. Together, these findings suggest that a general function of VH may be to resolve the current state of the world and relay this information to various target brain regions.

Further research may clarify specific functions of VH within learning and memory circuits and in defining a “context.” Contemporary findings suggest that dynamic changes in the timing and salience of events in the environment of an animal can break up the context in meaningful ways and lead to differential activity of VH and DH. However, mixed results have precluded clear definitions of hippocampal subregion functions in temporally and contextually complex learning (Raybuck and Lattal, 2014). Furthermore, questions remain regarding what features of the environment signal a shift in context (Clewett and Davachi, 2017). Does VH communication to target regions vary with changes in the external environment, or does VH simply communicate information about the current context and the passage of time? Future studies examining the temporal dynamics of VH and DH function may provide insights into how the hippocampus defines a context and whether VH primes neural circuits to rapidly retrieve salient events.

Twining et al. (2020) demonstrate the power of optogenetic approaches in illuminating neural mechanisms underlying different facets of associative fear learning. Similarly, studying the relational structure of brain regions across development may reveal both individual and coordinated neural contributions to complex learning and memory processes. Research examining simple cued fear acquisition and extinction across development have shown that the amygdala can support both of these learning processes without the involvement of mPFC (Kim et al., 2009). But can mPFC support temporally or contextually complex learning without input from the hippocampus, or vice versa? Given the dynamic restructuring and refinement of connectivity among the amygdala, hippocampus, and mPFC across age (Pattwell et al., 2016), developmental studies might yield insights into the necessity and sufficiency of VH and mPFC in complex learning processes. Integrating evidence from converging lines of research can help us understand features of the environment that influence how we learn and remember.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/jneurosci-journal-club.

  • We thank David Clewett, Gail Rosenbaum, and Teresa Esch for useful comments and suggestions.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Alexandra O. Cohen at ali.cohen{at}nyu.edu

References

  1. ↵
    1. Clewett D,
    2. Davachi L
    (2017) The ebb and flow of experience determines the temporal structure of memory. Curr Opin Behav Sci 17:186–193. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.013 pmid:29276730
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Fanselow MS
    (1990) Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning. Anim Learn Behav 18:264–270. doi:10.3758/BF03205285
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Fanselow MS,
    2. Dong H-W
    (2010) Are the dorsal and ventral hippocampus functionally distinct structures? Neuron 65:7–19. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Gilmartin MR,
    2. Balderston NL,
    3. Helmstetter FJ
    (2014) Prefrontal cortical regulation of fear learning. Trends Neurosci 37:455–464. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.05.004 pmid:24929864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kim JH,
    2. Hamlin AS,
    3. Richardson R
    (2009) Fear extinction across development: the involvement of the medial prefrontal cortex as assessed by temporary inactivation and immunohistochemistry. J Neurosci 29:10802–10808. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0596-09.2009 pmid:19726637
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Komorowski RW,
    2. Garcia CG,
    3. Wilson A,
    4. Hattori S,
    5. Howard MW,
    6. Eichenbaum H
    (2013) Ventral hippocampal neurons are shaped by experience to represent behaviorally relevant contexts. J Neurosci 33:8079–8087. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5458-12.2013 pmid:23637197
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Kwapis JL,
    2. Jarome TJ,
    3. Lee JL,
    4. Helmstetter FJ
    (2015) The retrosplenial cortex is involved in the formation of memory for context and trace fear conditioning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 123:110–116. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2015.06.007 pmid:26079095
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Maren S,
    2. Holt WG
    (2004) Hippocampus and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats: muscimol infusions into the ventral, but not dorsal, hippocampus impair the acquisition of conditional freezing to an auditory conditional stimulus. Behav Neurosci 118:97–110. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.118.1.97 pmid:14979786
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Maren S,
    2. Phan KL,
    3. Liberzon I
    (2013) The contextual brain: implications for fear conditioning, extinction and psychopathology. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:417–428. doi:10.1038/nrn3492 pmid:23635870
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Meyer HC,
    2. Odriozola P,
    3. Cohodes EM,
    4. Mandell JD,
    5. Li A,
    6. Yang R,
    7. Hall BS,
    8. Haberman JT,
    9. Zacharek SJ,
    10. Liston C,
    11. Lee FS,
    12. Gee DG
    (2019) Ventral hippocampus interacts with prelimbic cortex during inhibition of threat response via learned safety in both mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:26970–26979. doi:10.1073/pnas.1910481116
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Parent MA,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Su J,
    4. Netoff T,
    5. Yuan L-L
    (2010) Identification of the hippocampal input to medial prefrontal cortex in vitro. Cereb Cortex 20:393–403. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp108 pmid:19515741
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Pattwell SS,
    2. Liston C,
    3. Jing D,
    4. Ninan I,
    5. Yang RR,
    6. Witztum J,
    7. Murdock MH,
    8. Dincheva I,
    9. Bath KG,
    10. Casey BJ,
    11. Deisseroth K,
    12. Lee FS
    (2016) Dynamic changes in neural circuitry during adolescence are associated with persistent attenuation of fear memories. Nat Commun 7:11475. doi:10.1038/ncomms11475 pmid:27215672
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Raybuck JD,
    2. Lattal KM
    (2014) Bridging the interval: theory and neurobiology of trace conditioning. Behav Processes 101:103–111. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.08.016 pmid:24036411
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Sierra-Mercado D,
    2. Padilla-Coreano N,
    3. Quirk GJ
    (2011) Dissociable roles of prelimbic and infralimbic cortices, ventral hippocampus, and basolateral amygdala in the expression and extinction of conditioned fear. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:529–538. doi:10.1038/npp.2010.184 pmid:20962768
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Twining RC,
    2. Lepak K,
    3. Kirry AJ,
    4. Gilmartin MR
    (2020) Ventral hippocampal input to the prelimbic cortex dissociates the context from the cue association in trace fear memory. J Neurosci 40:3217–3230. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1453-19.2020 pmid:32188770
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Wang Q,
    2. Jin J,
    3. Maren S
    (2016) Renewal of extinguished fear activates ventral hippocampal neurons projecting to the prelimbic and infralimbic cortices in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 134:38–43. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2016.04.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Ye X,
    2. Kapeller-Libermann D,
    3. Travaglia A,
    4. Inda MC,
    5. Alberini CM
    (2017) Direct dorsal hippocampal-prelimbic cortex connections strengthen fear memories. Nat Neurosci 20:52–61. doi:10.1038/nn.4443 pmid:27869801
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 40 (44)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 40, Issue 44
28 Oct 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ventral Hippocampus Projections to Prelimbic Cortex Support Contextual Fear Memory
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Ventral Hippocampus Projections to Prelimbic Cortex Support Contextual Fear Memory
Alexandra O. Cohen, Heidi C. Meyer
Journal of Neuroscience 28 October 2020, 40 (44) 8410-8412; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1285-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Ventral Hippocampus Projections to Prelimbic Cortex Support Contextual Fear Memory
Alexandra O. Cohen, Heidi C. Meyer
Journal of Neuroscience 28 October 2020, 40 (44) 8410-8412; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1285-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Role of Ubiquilin-2 in Proteostasis and Tau Aggregation in Tauopathies
  • Separating Uncertainty from Surprise in Auditory Processing with Neurocomputational Models: Implications for Music Perception
  • Parabrachial Projections to PAG-RVM Axis May Promote Placebo Hypoalgesia and Nocebo Hyperalgesia
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.