Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Heterosynaptic Plasticity in Cortical Interneurons

Léa Caya-Bissonnette
Journal of Neuroscience 26 February 2020, 40 (9) 1793-1794; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2567-19.2020
Léa Caya-Bissonnette
University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Research Institute's Centre for Neural Dynamics, Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Léa Caya-Bissonnette
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Persistent alteration of synaptic strength in response to neuronal activity has long been considered a substrate of learning and memory (Hebb, 1949). Classical Hebbian plasticity results from near-coincidental presynaptic and postsynaptic action potentials (APs), with the precise order of spiking, either pre-post or post-pre, yielding an increase (LTP) and a decrease (LTD) of synaptic weights, respectively (Hebb, 1949; Bliss and Lomo, 1973; Levy and Steward, 1983; Malenka and Nicoll, 1993; Markram et al., 1997). When input-specific, this type of synaptic plasticity is referred to as homosynaptic plasticity. Hebbian forms of plasticity are central to cellular models of learning, but it presents a fundamental problem regarding the stability of neural networks. Specifically, unconstrained LTP expression may produce a pernicious positive-feedback loop and runaway excitation, whereas LTD can lead to extreme depression and synaptic demise.

Two forms of plasticity have been proposed to solve the network stability problem and counteract runaway dynamics that might otherwise arise with homosynaptic LTP and LTD: homeostatic plasticity (Lee et al., 2014) and some forms of heterosynaptic plasticity (Royer and Paré, 2003). Heterosynaptic plasticity occurs at synaptic connections not activated by the presynaptic neuron and therefore does not exhibit strict input specificity (unlike Hebbian plasticity). In some cases, the polarity of heterosynaptic plasticity leads to synaptic weight normalization (Royer and Paré, 2003) and thus contributes to network stabilization. Heterosynaptic plasticity has been reported mainly in synaptic connections between excitatory neurons. In a recent paper published in The Journal of Neuroscience, Chistiakova et al. (2019) investigated the presence of heterosynaptic plasticity at synapses between excitatory and inhibitory neurons of the visual cortex of young male rats.

The authors used extracellular electrodes to stimulate two sets of excitatory inputs onto a single inhibitory neuron whose activity was monitored in whole-cell intracellular recordings. Classic homosynaptic plasticity was induced at one set of inputs by pairing each of 30 excitatory presynaptic spikes with 5 postsynaptic APs (paired input). The second set of excitatory inputs was not activated during postsynaptic APs (unpaired input), thereby allowing the authors to monitor the presence of heterosynaptic plasticity at these synapses. This protocol induced mixed plasticity (i.e., LTP, LTD, or no change) at both paired and unpaired inputs. Precisely, if the paired input yielded LTD in a given neuron, the unpaired input onto that same neuron could express LTP or LTD. These results provided evidence of heterosynaptic plasticity. The authors then showed that activating the postsynaptic neuron with 30 bursts of 5 APs, in the absence of any presynaptic stimulation, was sufficient to induce heterosynaptic plasticity at excitatory inputs, again of mixed polarity. These results therefore hint toward a postsynaptic site of induction for this plasticity mechanism, leaving unanswered the site of expression.

Chistiakova et al. (2019) proceeded to examine whether cell type could account for the plasticity variability observed. They classified the recorded cells as fast-spiking (FS) or non-FS neurons, the two major classes of cortical inhibitory neurons (Kawaguchi and Kubota, 1997). Burst firing alone in FS neurons, without concurrent synaptic stimulation, induced mixed synaptic weight modifications: LTP (32%), LTD (34%), or no change (34%). These proportions are similar to those previously reported for excitatory synapses onto pyramidal neurons undergoing a similar protocol (Volgushev et al., 2016). Remarkably, excitatory synapses onto non-FS neurons responded differently in that they were preferentially potentiated (47%) in response to postsynaptic bursts alone, with only 15% of synapses expressing LTD and 38% expressing no change. Synapses onto non-FS neurons averaged 116 ± 4.9% potentiation compared with 106 ± 3.7% in FS neurons. Collectively, these results demonstrated important differences in the direction of heterosynaptic plasticity between interneuron subtypes.

The authors then examined mechanisms that might account for these differences. Specifically, they looked for predictors of the direction of plasticity, focusing on animal age, cortical layer, initial release probability, as well as baseline EPSP amplitude, latency, and slope. Of these, the initial release probability of synapses (determined by the ratio of a 50 ms interval paired-pulse) was found to be the strongest predictor of plasticity direction: synapses with initial low release probability (high paired-pulse ratio [PPR]) were more likely to undergo LTP, whereas those with high release probability (low PPR) tended to undergo LTD. The relationship between initial PPR and the sign of plasticity suggests a weight-dependent heterosynaptic plasticity, which favors the hypothesis that heterosynaptic plasticity can act to normalize synaptic weights. This is because synapses with low release probability are relatively unlikely to respond to a single stimulus. These weak synapses tend to be reinforced by this form of LTP, whereas synapses with high release probability are more likely to be depressed. As a result, the total synaptic weight tends to be largely unchanged, thereby enacting a form of weight normalization. Importantly, synapses onto non-FS neurons on average had lower release probability than those onto FS neurons, which may explain the enhanced propensity of synapses onto non-FS neurons to potentiate.

The results outlined above do not formally address the site of expression of this form of plasticity. To this end, Chistiakova et al. (2019) further dissected the relationship between the release probability of the synapse and the direction of heterosynaptic plasticity. The authors found that, even during strictly postsynaptic activation, heterosynaptic LTP was mediated at least partly by an increase in release probability, whereas LTD was mediated by a decrease in release probability. These results indicate that, although the plasticity is induced by postsynaptic spiking alone, it is mediated by presynaptic changes. Such plasticity would necessarily require transsynaptic interactions. This interaction could be mediated by postsynaptic release of a retrograde messenger that activates presynaptic receptors after strong postsynaptic depolarization (Zilberter et al., 1999). Multiple retrograde messengers have been shown to induce long-term changes in synaptic weights by modifying presynaptic release probability (Zilberter et al., 1999; Nugent et al., 2007). Chistiakova et al. (2019) discussed nitric oxide as a possible candidate (Volgushev et al., 2000), although more than one retrograde messenger may be involved. Another possibility is that GABA is dendritically released from the postsynaptic neuron and acts on GABAB receptors located on the presynaptic terminal of excitatory neurons (Zilberter et al., 1999; Gonchar et al., 2001). Indeed, GABAB receptors are present at the presynaptic extracellular synaptic sites of excitatory neurons of the visual cortex (Gonchar et al., 2001). In other cell types, activation of GABAB receptors at the presynaptic terminal has been shown to suppress the activity of voltage-sensitive calcium channels and thus reduce glutamate release onto several cell types (Dolphin and Scott, 1986; Gonchar et al., 2001; Geddes et al., 2016). Determining which retrograde messengers are involved is imperative to determining the mechanism enabling the presynaptically expressed heterosynaptic plasticity observed by Chistiakova et al. (2019).

Another important question is how the heterosynaptic plasticity observed here is determined by the initial release probability of the synapse. The interaction of retrograde messengers with specific receptors at the presynaptic membrane has been shown, in some cases, to yield presynaptic LTP or LTD (Pelkey et al., 2005). In this way, receptors may be upregulated and downregulated according to the state of the synapse, and allow retrograde signaling to modify the synaptic weight accordingly (Crosby et al., 2011). Alternatively, proteins such as protein kinase C, whose activity regulates the size of the readily releasable pool of vesicles (Stevens and Sullivan, 1998), which correlates with synaptic release probability (Dobrunz, 2002), could mediate the effects of the retrograde signal. Future research will be required to dissect the mechanism underlying the weight dependence of heterosynaptic plasticity as a means to implement synaptic weight normalization.

The study of Chistiakova et al. (2019) supports the generality of heterosynaptic plasticity and supports the hypothesis that this form of plasticity helps to stabilize total synaptic weights. Future work, likely relying in part on computational modeling of neural networks, is necessary to determine how homeostatic plasticity and weight-dependent heterosynaptic plasticity mechanisms at both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites interact to maintain neural network stability.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneurosci-journal-club.

  • The author is a trainee in the laboratory of Dr. Jean-Claude Béïque who is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. I thank Dr. Béïque and laboratory members for the ongoing training and exciting discussion that continuously shapes my research interests and professional development; and Philippe Vincent-Lamarre for providing useful comments.

  • The author declares no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Léa Caya-Bissonnette at lcaya082{at}uottawa.ca

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bliss TV,
    2. Lomo T
    (1973) Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol 232:331–356. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010273 pmid:4727084
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Chistiakova M,
    2. Ilin V,
    3. Roshchin M,
    4. Bannon N,
    5. Malyshev A,
    6. Kisvárday Z,
    7. Volgushev M
    (2019) Distinct heterosynaptic plasticity in fast spiking and non-fast-spiking inhibitory neurons in rat visual cortex. J Neurosci 35:6865–6878. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3039-18.2019 pmid:31300522
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Crosby KM,
    2. Inoue W,
    3. Pittman QJ,
    4. Bains JS
    (2011) Endocannabinoids gate state-dependent plasticity of synaptic inhibition in feeding circuits. Neuron 71:529–541. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.006 pmid:21835348
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Dobrunz LE
    (2002) Release probability is regulated by the size of the readily releasable vesicle pool at excitatory synapses in hippocampus. Int J Dev Neurosci 20:225–236. doi:10.1016/S0736-5748(02)00015-1 pmid:12175858
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Dolphin AC,
    2. Scott RH
    (1986) Inhibition of calcium currents in cultured rat dorsal root ganglion neurons by (−)-baclofen. Br J Pharmacol 88:213–220. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb09489.x pmid:2423173
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Geddes SD,
    2. Assadzada S,
    3. Lemelin D,
    4. Sokolovski A,
    5. Bergeron R,
    6. Haj-Dahmane S,
    7. Béïque JC
    (2016) Target-specific modulation of the descending prefrontal cortex inputs to the dorsal raphe nucleus by cannabinoids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:5429–5434. doi:10.1073/pnas.1522754113 pmid:27114535
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Gonchar Y,
    2. Pang L,
    3. Malitschek B,
    4. Bettler B,
    5. Burkhalter A
    (2001) Subcellular localization of GABA(B) receptor subunits in rat visual cortex. J Comp Neurol 431:182–197. doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20010305)431:2%3C182::AID-CNE1064%3E3.0.CO;2-K pmid:11169999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hebb DO
    (1949) The organization of behavior: a neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.
  9. ↵
    1. Kawaguchi Y,
    2. Kubota Y
    (1997) GABAergic cell subtypes and their synaptic connections in rat frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 7:476–486. doi:10.1093/cercor/7.6.476 pmid:9276173
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Lee KF,
    2. Soares C,
    3. Béïque JC
    (2014) Tuning into diversity of homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology 78:31–37. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.03.016 pmid:23541721
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Levy WB,
    2. Steward O
    (1983) Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 8:791–797. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(83)90010-6 pmid:6306504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Malenka RC,
    2. Nicoll RA
    (1993) NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity: multiple forms and mechanisms. Trends Neurosci 16:521–527. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(93)90197-T pmid:7509523
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Markram H,
    2. Lübke J,
    3. Frotscher M,
    4. Sakmann B
    (1997) Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275:213–215. doi:10.1126/science.275.5297.213 pmid:8985014
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Nugent FS,
    2. Penick EC,
    3. Kauer JA
    (2007) Opioids block long-term potentiation of inhibitory synapses. Nature 446:1086–1090. doi:10.1038/nature05726 pmid:17460674
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Pelkey KA,
    2. Lavezzari G,
    3. Racca C,
    4. Roche KW,
    5. McBain CJ
    (2005) mGluR7 is a metaplastic switch controlling bidirectional plasticity of feedforward inhibition. Neuron 46:89–102. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.011 pmid:15820696
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Royer S,
    2. Paré D
    (2003) Conservation of total synaptic weight through balanced synaptic depression and potentiation. Nature 422:518–522. doi:10.1038/nature01530 pmid:12673250
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Stevens CF,
    2. Sullivan JM
    (1998) Regulation of the readily releasable vesicle pool by protein kinase C. Neuron 21:885–893. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80603-0 pmid:9808473
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Volgushev M,
    2. Balaban P,
    3. Chistiakova M,
    4. Eysel UT
    (2000) Retrograde signaling with nitric oxide at neocortical synapses. Eur J Neurosci 12:4255–4267. doi:10.1046/j.0953-816X.2000.01322.x pmid:11122337
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Volgushev M,
    2. Chen JY,
    3. Ilin V,
    4. Goz R,
    5. Chistiakova M,
    6. Bazhenov M
    (2016) Partial breakdown of input specificity of STDP at individual synapses promotes new learning. J Neurosci 36:8842–8855. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0552-16.2016 pmid:27559167
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Zilberter Y,
    2. Kaiser KM,
    3. Sakmann B
    (1999) Dendritic GABA release depresses excitatory transmission between layer 2/3 pyramidal and bitufted neurons in rat neocortex. Neuron 24:979–988. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81044-2 pmid:10624960
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 40 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 40, Issue 9
26 Feb 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Heterosynaptic Plasticity in Cortical Interneurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Heterosynaptic Plasticity in Cortical Interneurons
Léa Caya-Bissonnette
Journal of Neuroscience 26 February 2020, 40 (9) 1793-1794; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2567-19.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Heterosynaptic Plasticity in Cortical Interneurons
Léa Caya-Bissonnette
Journal of Neuroscience 26 February 2020, 40 (9) 1793-1794; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2567-19.2020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A New Optogenetic Tool to Investigate the Role of Dopamine Signaling in the Basal Ganglia
  • Early Neural Development of Social Interaction Perception in the Superior Temporal Sulcus
  • Universal Coding for Uncertainty?
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.