Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 21 April 2021, 41 (16) 3562; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.41.16.2021
Teresa Esch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Spatial Acuity of Mechanosensory Subfields in Fingers

Ewa Jarocka, J. Andrew Pruszynski, and Roland S. Johansson

(see pages 3622–3634)

Our ability to lift and manipulate objects depends greatly on our mechanosensory systems. Mechanosensory afferents that innervate our palms and fingerpads are divided into four subtypes based on receptive field size, response to sustained stimulation, and the type of mechanosensory organ innervated. Type I slowly adapting (SA-I) and fast-adapting (FA-I) fibers have the most compact receptive fields, and they innervate Merkel cells and Meissner corpuscles, respectively. Although compact, the receptive fields of these afferents are complex, having multiple areas of peak sensitivity, called subfields. Furthermore, the receptive subfields of multiple afferents are interdigitated. Jarocka et al. hypothesized that this arrangement increases the spatial resolution of tactile sensation.

To support this hypothesis, the authors estimated the spatial acuity of individual subfields of human SA-I and FA-I axons. They recorded from single axons in the upper arm while stimulating a fingertip with a series of tangentially moving, small, raised dots on a rotating drum. They mapped receptive fields by recording the position of dot stimuli when each action potential fired. And they estimated subfield acuity by using Gaussian convolution to add noise to the map and seeing how this manipulation affected the correlation between spike patterns produced during sequential presentations of the same stimulus. These analyses suggested that, regardless of fiber type, the spatial acuity of subfields was ∼0.41 mm, similar to the width of a papillary ridge. Although subfield layouts were heterogeneous across neurons, subfield acuity and layout for a given neuron were similar across stimulus speeds and directions.

These results suggest that the spatial acuity of receptive subfields for both SA-I and FA-I fibers is in the submillimeter range, comparable to the spacing of the papillary ridges of the fingertips. This makes sense given that Meissner bodies are localized to the sides of ridges, Merkel cells are centered on ridges, and ridges can be deflected individually by tactile stimuli. Nevertheless, how individual and populations of SA-I and FA-I fibers encode stimuli, given that each fiber has multiple subfields, remains to be elucidated.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Nine color-coded receptive field sensitivity maps of human tactile neurons projected onto a fingertip. Each receptive field has many subfields. The spatial acuity of these subfields is similar to the spacing of papillary ridges. See Jarocka et al. for details

A Transcription Factor that Protects Neurons from α-Synuclein

Brent J. Ryan, Nora Bengoa-Vergniory, Matthew Williamson, Ecem Kirkiz, Rosalind Roberts, et al.

(see pages 3731–3746)

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and by intracellular accumulation of α-synuclein, a protein thought to function in synaptic vesicle release. The pathological mechanisms underlying PD remain unclear, but several genetic mutations and environmental toxins have been linked to the disease. Notably, these genes and toxins affect neurons throughout the brain, yet SNc dopamine neurons are disproportionately prone to degeneration. This susceptibility may stem from the unusually high energy demands of SNc dopamine neurons as a consequence of their tonic activity, large calcium fluctuations, and extensive axons with multitudinous release sites. The oxidative phosphorylation required to meet these energy demands generates high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can cause oxidative stress. Among other effects, oxidative stress promotes aggregation of α-synuclein, which is likely expressed at high levels in the large terminal arbors of SNc dopamine neurons. Aggregation of α-synuclein not only causes synaptic dysfunction, but also exacerbates mitochondrial stress, creating a positive feedback loop that may eventually lead to neurodegeneration (Gonzalez-Rodriguez et al., 2020, Prog Brain Res 252:61).

Ryan, Bengoa-Vergniory, et al. suggest that failure to upregulate RE1 silencing transcription factor (REST) also contributes to the vulnerability of SNc dopamine neurons in PD. In mice overexpressing human α-synuclein (which recapitulate features of PD), SNc dopamine neurons exhibit α-synuclein accumulation, mitochondrial fragmentation, and degeneration, but GABAergic neurons in the adjacent substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) do not. A proteomic screen prompted the authors to examine differential expression of REST. Whereas REST was prominent in the nuclei of SNr neurons, it was undetectable in the nuclei of SNc dopamine neurons. REST levels were also reduced in dopamine neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells from PD patients. Moreover, REST knockout led to increased mitochondrial fragmentation and increased ROS production in SH-SY5Y cells, whereas REST overexpression reduced the impact of a mitochondrial toxin on SH-SY5Y cell survival. Further work suggested that the protective effects of REST were mediated partly by upregulation of the oxidative response transcription factor PGC-1α.

Overall, the results suggest that upregulation of REST protects neurons from mitochondrial dysfunction and fragmentation induced by α-synuclein overexpression. Why SNc dopamine neurons fail to upregulate REST is unclear. Nonetheless, targeting this pathway early in PD may help to slow progression.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 41 (16)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 41, Issue 16
21 Apr 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 21 April 2021, 41 (16) 3562; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.41.16.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 21 April 2021, 41 (16) 3562; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.41.16.2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Spatial Acuity of Mechanosensory Subfields in Fingers
    • A Transcription Factor that Protects Neurons from α-Synuclein
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.