Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 2 June 2021, 41 (22) 4749; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.41.22.2021
Teresa Esch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Astrocytes Mediate IGF-1 Effects on Synaptic Plasticity

José Antonio Noriega-Prieto, Laura Eva Maglio, Jonathan A. Zegarra-Valdivia, Jaime Pignatelli, Ana M. Fernandez, et al.

(see pages 4768–4781)

Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is a peptide with diverse roles in the CNS, including promotion of neurogenesis, dendrite growth, and synaptic plasticity. It acts by binding to IGF1 receptors (IGF1Rs), which are present on both neurons and glia. Downstream signaling pathways have various effects, which can differ from one brain area to another. Therefore, how IGF-1 regulates synaptic plasticity remains incompletely understood.

Noriega-Prieto et al. have investigated how IGF-1 modulates synaptic strength in the barrel cortex of young mice. Injection of IGF-1 into layer II/III increased the amplitude of local field potentials evoked by repeated whisker deflection in vivo. Similarly, IGF-1 induced long-term potentiation (LTP) of synapses between layer IV axons and layer II/III pyramidal neurons in slices. Furthermore, IGF-1 lowered the threshold for spike timing-dependent LTP and induced short-term potentiation (STP) of EPSCs in pyramidal neurons. In addition, IGF-1 induced long-term depression (LTD) of IPSCs in pyramidal cells by reducing the probability of presynaptic GABA release.

Importantly, IGF-1 also induced calcium transients in astrocytes and triggered ATP release from these cells. Moreover, STP and LTD induction by IGF-1 were blocked by chelating astrocytic calcium, knocking out astrocytic IGF1Rs (and thus blocking ATP release from astrocytes), or inhibiting adenosine A2A receptors. Finally, knocking out astrocytic IGF1Rs prevented the effects of IGF-1 on LTP threshold in vivo, and impaired the performance of mice on a whisker-mediated texture-discrimination task.

These results suggest that IGF-1 can regulate synaptic plasticity indirectly, by triggering release of ATP from astrocytes. ATP is metabolized to adenosine extracellularly, and adenosine activates A2A receptors on GABAergic terminals. The resulting decrease in GABA release may free pyramidal cells from tonic inhibition, thus increasing their spiking, which enables potentiation of excitatory input. This process appears to be essential for learning in the whisker system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

IGF-I induces LTD of IPSCs in layer II/III pyramidal neurons by stimulating ATP release from astrocytes, leading to activation of adenosine receptors that reduce GABA release from GABAergic interneurons. See Noriega-Prieto, et al. for details.

Some Neurons in Crow Brain Encode Numerosity Zero

Maximilian E. Kirschhock, Helen M. Ditz, and Andreas Nieder

(see pages 4889–4896)

The concept of zero as a number seems simple and even intuitive to most people, but it appeared relatively late in human history. Indeed, zero was first described as a number subject to mathematical rules by an Indian mathematician in AD 628, and when the idea reached Europe in the 13th century, it was controversial. This late conceptualization of zero becomes less surprising when one considers that the nervous system evolved to process sensory stimuli, not the absence of stimuli (Nieder, 2016, Trends Cogn Sci 20:830). Creating neural representations of no stimulus likely requires training.

Many animals, including insects, fish, birds, and monkeys have been trained to respond to the absence of stimulation. Whether these responses reflect the encoding of zero as a number or simply “no stimulus” is usually unclear. To assess this, researchers must determine whether errors on trials with zero items are similar to those on trials with more items. One such error is the distance effect seen in delayed-match-to-numerosity tests. In these tests, animals are shown a stimulus, followed by a delay, then a test stimulus, and they must report whether the test stimulus has the same number of items as the sample. Animals are more likely to report a match erroneously if the sample and test stimuli have similar numbers of items. This distance effect has been shown for numerosity zero in humans, macaques, and honeybees. Furthermore, neurons tuned to numerosity zero have been identified in the prefrontal cortex of macaques. Kirschhock et al. report similar encoding of numerosity zero in carrion crows.

Two crows were trained on the numerosity-matching test. One showed a numerical distance effect for numerosity zero (making more mistakes when the test stimulus had one item than when it had two items), but the second crow made too few mistakes to discern the effect. Consistent with previous work, neurons in the nidopallium caudolaterale—considered analogous to mammalian prefrontal cortex—were tuned to specific numerosities, including numerosity zero. Notably, a distance effect was apparent in the tuning curves of these neurons: neurons that spiked most in response to zero items responded progressively less to one and two items. Finally, a classifier trained on neuronal population responses could decipher the numerosity of stimuli, including numerosity zero.

These results suggest that carrion crows represent zero as a number in a continuum with higher numbers. This adds to accumulating evidence that, despite the lack of a layered cerebral cortex, corvids have cognitive abilities that rival those of primates.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 41 (22)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 41, Issue 22
2 Jun 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 2 June 2021, 41 (22) 4749; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.41.22.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 2 June 2021, 41 (22) 4749; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.41.22.2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Astrocytes Mediate IGF-1 Effects on Synaptic Plasticity
    • Some Neurons in Crow Brain Encode Numerosity Zero
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.