Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleResearch Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Regulation of Perineuronal Nets in the Adult Cortex by the Activity of the Cortical Network

Gabrielle Devienne, Sandrine Picaud, Ivan Cohen, Juliette Piquet, Ludovic Tricoire, Damien Testa, Ariel A. Di Nardo, Jean Rossier, Bruno Cauli and Bertrand Lambolez
Journal of Neuroscience 7 July 2021, 41 (27) 5779-5790; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0434-21.2021
Gabrielle Devienne
1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gabrielle Devienne
Sandrine Picaud
1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivan Cohen
1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juliette Piquet
1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ludovic Tricoire
1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damien Testa
2Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unite Mixte de Recherche 7241, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1050, PSL Research University, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ariel A. Di Nardo
2Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unite Mixte de Recherche 7241, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1050, PSL Research University, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ariel A. Di Nardo
Jean Rossier
1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruno Cauli
1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bertrand Lambolez
1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Perineuronal net (PNN) accumulation around parvalbumin-expressing (PV) inhibitory interneurons marks the closure of critical periods of high plasticity, whereas PNN removal reinstates juvenile plasticity in the adult cortex. Using targeted chemogenetic in vivo approaches in the adult mouse visual cortex, we found that transient inhibition of PV interneurons, through metabotropic or ionotropic chemogenetic tools, induced PNN regression. EEG recordings indicated that inhibition of PV interneurons did not elicit unbalanced network excitation. Likewise, inhibition of local excitatory neurons also induced PNN regression, whereas chemogenetic excitation of either PV or excitatory neurons did not reduce the PNN. We also observed that chemogenetically inhibited PV interneurons exhibited reduced PNN compared with their untransduced neighbors, and confirmed that single PV interneurons express multiple genes enabling individual regulation of their own PNN density. Our results indicate that PNN density is regulated in the adult cortex by local changes of network activity that can be triggered by modulation of PV interneurons. PNN regulation may provide adult cortical circuits with an activity-dependent mechanism to control their local remodeling.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The perineuronal net is an extracellular matrix, which accumulates around individual parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory neurons during postnatal development, and is seen as a barrier that prevents plasticity of neuronal circuits in the adult cerebral cortex. We found that transiently inhibiting parvalbumin-expressing or excitatory cortical neurons triggers a local decrease of perineuronal net density. Our results indicate that perineuronal nets are regulated in the adult cortex depending on the activity of local microcircuits. These findings uncover an activity-dependent mechanism by which adult cortical circuits may locally control their plasticity.

  • cerebral cortex
  • critical period plasticity
  • extracellular matrix
  • fast-spiking parvalbumin interneurons
  • perineuronal net

Introduction

During the postnatal development of the cerebral cortex, the closure of a highly plastic period, called critical period, is concomitant with the accumulation of the perineuronal net (PNN), a specialized extracellular matrix enwrapping fast-spiking parvalbumin (PV) interneurons (Hensch, 2005). The PNN is made of lecticans, proteoglycan link proteins, and tenascin R, it is reticulated and attached to the membrane via hyaluronan, and it can be degraded by various proteases (Dityatev et al., 2010; Kwok et al., 2012; Ferrer-Ferrer and Dityatev, 2018). The PNN attracts in part the homeoprotein transcription factor OTX2 from cerebrospinal fluid to accumulate within PV cells, which in turn enhances PNN accumulation (Sugiyama et al., 2008). Enzymatic digestion of the PNN, modulating the inhibitory tone, or antagonizing OTX2 import by PV cells, reinstates high circuit plasticity in the adult; and a decrease of the PNN accompanies the reopening of plasticity, whatever the paradigm used (Hensch et al., 1998; Pizzorusso et al., 2002; Fagiolini et al., 2004; Harauzov et al., 2010; Sale et al., 2010; Beurdeley et al., 2012; Lensjø et al., 2017a). Conversely, PNN stability is linked to memory resilience, and PNN deficits are thought to contribute to circuit dysfunctions in several pathologies of the CNS (Testa et al., 2019).

Alteration of GABAergic transmission can induce PNN regression and reinstate high cortical plasticity, indicating that the PNN is dynamically regulated in the adult (Hensch, 2005; Harauzov et al., 2010; Sale et al., 2010). PV interneurons are strongly interconnected with excitatory pyramidal neurons, express multiple genes involved in PNN synthesis and degradation, and their maturation parallels that of their PNN (Angulo et al., 1999; Ascoli et al., 2008; Okaty et al., 2009; Rossier et al., 2015). This suggests that PV cells are key actors in the physiological regulation of the PNN. Likewise, transient and targeted inhibition of PV cells using chemogenetics (Alexander et al., 2009) in vivo is sufficient to restore visual plasticity in the mouse cortex after closure of the critical period (Kuhlman et al., 2013). We hypothesize that this chemogenetic paradigm induces PNN reduction, making the network permissive to circuit plasticity.

Here, we used targeted chemogenetic in vivo approaches to test this hypothesis and examine the physiological factors that govern PNN remodeling in the adult mouse visual cortex. We also assessed the acute electrophysiological effects of chemogenetic paradigms. We found that inhibiting PV interneurons, or local excitatory neurons, induced PNN regression, and obtained evidence for the regulation of PNNs individually.

Materials and Methods

Animals, viruses, and surgery

Experiments were conducted in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive 86/609/062, and animal protocols approved by our local ethics committee (Ce5/2012/062). Transgenic mice lines from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories are as follows: PV-Cre (#008069, Pvalbtm1(cre)Arbr) (Hippenmeyer et al., 2005) and Emx1-Cre (#005628, Emx1tm1(cre)Krj) (Gorski et al., 2002) were genotyped by PCR with following primers: PV-Cre, WT forward CAGAGCAGGCATGGTGACTA, WT reverse AGTACCAAGCAGGCAGGAGA, mutant forward, GCGGTCTGGCAGTAAAAACTATC, mutant reverse GTGAAACAGCATTGCTGTCACTT (WT: 500 bp, mutant: 100 bp); Emx1 Cre, WT forward AAGGTGTGGTTCCAGAATCG, WT reverse CTCTCCACCAGAAGGCTGAG, mutant forward GCGGTCTGGCAGTAAAAACTATC, mutant reverse GTGAAACAGCATTGCTGTCACTT (WT: 102 bp, mutant: 378 bp).

Adeno-associated pseudovirions (AAVs) encoding designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drug (DREADD) (Alexander et al., 2009) AAV2/5-hSyn-DIO-hM4Di-mCherry (titer: 5.2 × 1012 gc/ml) and AAV2/5-hSyn-DIO-hM3Dq-mCherry (7.8 × 1012 gc/ml) were produced from Addgene plasmids #44362 and #44361 at the facility of Nantes University (Unite Mixte de Recherche 1089). AAV2/5-hsyn-FLEX:rev-PSAML141F,Y115F-GlyR-IRES-GFP (3.6 × 1012, diluted at 1 × 1012 gc/ml) was generously provided by C.J. Magnus (Sternson Lab, Janelia Research Campus) (Magnus et al., 2011).

For viral transduction, postnatal day (P) 25-28 PV-Cre or Emx1-Cre mice was anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine/xylazine (100/10 mg/kg body weight) and restrained in a neonatal stereotaxic adaptor (David Kopf Instrument). The scalp was retracted, and a burr hole was drilled in the skull at coordinates AP = 0.05 mm and ML = 2 mm from λ to target the V1 area of the right visual cortex. Viral suspension (0.5 µl for hM3Dq and hM4Di, 1 µl for PSAM-GlyR) was injected with a glass capillary (1 µm tip, Drummond) at 500 µm below the pial surface at a speed of 100 nl/min. The scalp was sutured and mice were housed for at least 4 weeks with food and water ad libitum.

Chemogenetic treatment and histologic processing

Four weeks after viral injection, DREADD-expressing mice received four intraperitoneal injections at 12 h intervals of DREADD agonist clozapine-N-oxide (CNO, 1 mg/kg; HelloBio) or PBS (Na phosphate 10 mm, NaCl 137 mm, KCl 2.7 mm, pH 7.4; 100 µl) (see Fig. 1). PSAM-GlyR-expressing mice were treated similarly with the PSAM agonist PSEM89S (10 mg/kg, kind gift of C.J. Magnus) (Magnus et al., 2011) or PBS.

One day after the last intraperitoneal injection, mice were anesthetized using a lethal mix of ketamine/xylazine (200/20 mg/kg body weight) and perfused transcardially with PBS containing 4% PFA. Brains were extracted, incubated 2 h at 4°C in the same fixative, and sectioned in 50 µm coronal slices using a vibratome (VT1000S, Leica Microsystems). Free-floating sections were blocked for 1.5 h at room temperature in PBS/0.25% Triton X-100/0.2% gelatin solution (PBS-GT) and incubated overnight at 4°C in PBS-GT with primary antibodies against PV, and RFP (DREADD-mCherry) or GFP (PSAM-GlyR). Slices were then washed with PBS and incubated for 1.5 h at room temperature with relevant secondary antibodies in PBS-GT. After washing in PBS, slices were next incubated for 2 h with biotinylated Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA, 10 µg/ml, CliniSciences) for PNN labeling. Slices were then washed and incubated for 1.5 h with streptavidin-AMCA (1:1000, Vector Laboratories). Finally, slices were washed and mounted on gelatin-coated slides in Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotechnology). Antibodies were used at following dilutions: mice IgG1 anti-PV (1:1000, Sigma Millipore), rat anti-RFP (1:500, Chromotek), chicken anti-GFP (1:1000, Aves Labs), goat anti-mouse IgG1 AlexaFluor-488 (1:500, Invitrogen), goat anti-mouse IgG AlexaFluor-555 (1:500, Invitrogen), goat anti-rat IgG AlexaFluor-555 (1:500, Invitrogen), and donkey anti-chicken IgY AlexaFluor-488 (1:400; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories).

Fluorescence images were acquired using an epifluorescence macro-apotome (Axiozoomer, Carl Zeiss) equipped with filters DAPI, GFP, and CY3 to acquire images of entire sections, an epifluorescence microscope (DMR, Leica Microsystems) equipped with filters A4, GFP, and CY3 to analyze PNN density, and a laser scanning confocal microscope (SP5, Leica Microsystems) with 20×, 40×, and 63× objectives, and 405, 488, and 561 nm lasers. Images were processed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health; http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).

PNN density analyses

PNN density was analyzed by quantifying WFA fluorescence intensity around PV-immunoreactive cells in the V1 area of both ipsilateral (virally transduced) and contralateral (uninjected) visual cortices using wide-field microscopy. Only brains showing extended viral transduction in V1 were kept for further analysis. In the case of targeted transduction of PV interneurons, only mCherry+ (DREADD-expressing) or GFP+ (expressing PSAM-GlyR) cells were analyzed ipsilaterally. Analysis was performed on every second section of the adjacent 50 µm coronal sections encompassing the bilateral V1 areas along the mediolateral and anteroposterior axes, resulting in 3 or 4 sections analyzed per animal. The region analyzed in V1 was selected using a 20× objective, based on conspicuously low WFA staining in V2 area (see Fig. 1) (Ueno et al., 2018), as delineated by Paxinos and Franklin (2004). Images were acquired in layers IV-V using a 63× objective, starting medially from the V2/V1 border and progressing laterally into V1 through contiguous acquisition fields. In each field, all PV+ (or ipsilateral PV+/mCherry+ or PV+/GFP+) cells were selected for PNN density analysis (see Fig. 1). Images were acquired with constant brightness and contrast, and variable exposure time. Perisomatic PNN was delineated manually based on WFA staining intensity (see Fig. 1), forming ring-shaped ROIs defined using the XOR function of the FIJI software (ImageJ). For each ROI, we measured area and mean WFA fluorescence intensity, which was normalized for exposure time. For each animal, the average fluorescence intensity of contralateral ROIs was used to normalize fluorescence intensity of each ipsilateral and contralateral ROI. Data obtained in different mice for a given condition were compared using a Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test. Since no significant difference was observed between mice for a given condition, data were pooled. Between-group comparisons were performed using Mann–Whitney nonparametric test.

In order to investigate the regulation of the PNN by individual PV neurons, WFA staining intensity was compared within pairs of PV+ cells: one being hM4Di+ (mCherry+) and the other being its closest hM4Di– (mCherry–) neighbor. Confocal images were acquired with a 40× objective at the lateral edge of the hM4Di-expressing zone within the V1 area, to maximize the number of hM4Di+/PV+ and hM4Di–/PV+ cell pairs. Pairs were selected based on a distance criterion: the mean of the minimal distance between hM4Di+/PV+ cells determined for each section (range: 70-106 µm, n = 7 sections, N = 3 mice) was used as the maximal radius to select pairs of hM4Di+ and hM4Di– PV+ neighboring cells. PNN density was quantified as described above, and compared within cell pairs. Comparison between hM4Di+/PV+ and hM4Di–/PV+ cells was performed using Wilcoxon nonparametric test. Linear regression analysis was performed to test the independence between WFA staining intensities of hM4Di+/PV+ and hM4Di–/PV+ cells.

Electrophysiological recordings of CNO/DREADD effects in cortical slices

Four to 10 weeks after viral injection, mice were anesthetized using a lethal mix of ketamine/xylazine (200/20 mg/kg body weight) and 250-µm-thick coronal slices of V1 visual cortex prepared for whole-cell patch-clamp recordings (Hay et al., 2019) performed on mCherry+ layers IV-V PV interneurons or layer V pyramidal cells selected under epifluorescence illumination with a 535 nm LED (CoolLED) and an RFP filter set (Semrock). Membrane potentials were not corrected for liquid junction potential. Cells were set at −60 mV by continuous current injection and submitted to series of current pulses (800 ms, from –100 to 375 pA with 25 pA increments). Parameters were measured from three series of pulses in control conditions and 2 min after the beginning of CNO bath application. Resting potential was determined on sweeps where no current was injected, input resistance on responses to hyperpolarizing pulses eliciting 10-15 mV shifts, and rheobase defined as the minimal depolarizing pulse triggering an action potential. Between-group comparisons were performed using paired Wilcoxon nonparametric test.

EEG recordings of CNO/DREADD effects in vivo

Four weeks after viral injection, mice were subjected to anesthesia induced with 2% isoflurane and maintained by ketamine/xylazine (100/10 mg per kg body weight), and their body temperature maintained at 36.5°C. Electrodes made of bundles of insulated tungsten wires were implanted through the skull and sealed in place with acrylic resin. An epidural screw placed above the olfactory bulb was used as ground. One electrode placed above the cerebellum was used as reference. Three recording electrodes were implanted ipsilateral to the hM4Di-expressing hemisphere in V1 (AP = 0.05 mm, ML = ±2 mm, DV = −0.5 mm from λ) and somatosensory S1 (AP = −2 mm, ML = 2 mm, DV = −0.5 mm from bregma) cortical areas. After a 1 week resting period, EEG and simultaneous video recordings of awake mice were performed as previously described (Sieu et al., 2015). A half hour recording was extracted in each condition for analysis using a custom-made software based on Labview (National Instruments). The EEG signal was filtered with 1-4, 6-10, 30-50, 55-95, and 100-150 Hz pass-bands, and mean power values were extracted for each band and normalized to control condition. Equality of variances was assessed using the F test. Data obtained in different conditions were compared using a Student's t test.

Throughout this study, treatments (ligand vs PBS) or experimental conditions (transduction of PV-Cre or Emx1-Cre with DREADDs- or PSAM-encoding AAVs) were allocated randomly across mice, results are given as mean ± SEM, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 6 software (Statsoft). Analyses have been performed using both mice genders. For each chemogenetics experiments, 3 or 4 mice per group (PBS or Drug) with between 70 and 130 cells per condition (Drug-WFA ipsi; Drug- WFA contra; PBS-WFA ipsi; PBS-WFA contra) have been analyzed. For EEG experiments, a total of 3 mice have been used. For the patch-clamp recordings, 8 cells per group (PBS or CNO) have been analyzed. All raw data are available on request to the corresponding author. All values are expressed as mean percentage ± SEM percentage in Results and as mean ± SEM in summary tables. Statistical significance for the chemogenetics experiments was determined using the Mann–Whitney U test (Table 1). Comparisons between conditions (baseline, CNO) of patch-clamp recordings were determined using a Wilcoxon nonparametric test (Table 2). Between-group comparisons of EEG band power were assessed using a Student's t test (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Summary of chemogenetic experimentsa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Statistical analysis of patch-clamp recordingsa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Statistical analysis of EEG recordingsa

Results

Targeted chemogenetic inhibition of PV interneurons induces PNN regression in the adult visual cortex

The PNN accumulates postnatally to reach adult density at P50 in the V1 area of the mouse visual cortex (Lee et al., 2017; Lensjø et al., 2017b; Ye and Miao, 2013). In order to test the hypothesis that targeted chemogenetic inhibition of PV interneurons alters adult PNN density, we adapted the protocol known to reinstate visual plasticity at P35 (Kuhlman et al., 2013) to measure PNN changes between P58 and P61 (see Materials and Methods; Fig. 1). Hemilateral injection of Cre-dependent AAV encoding the inhibitory DREADD hM4Di fused to fluorescent protein mCherry in the V1 area of the visual cortex of PV-Cre mice resulted in robust and selective expression in PV interneurons, with virtually all mCherry+ cells being also PV+ (n = 208 of 208 cells; Fig. 2). Four weeks after viral injection, mice were treated with the DREADD agonist CNO or with PBS. PNNs are most abundant at the peak of PV interneuron distribution in layer IV and upper layer V (Rudy et al., 2011; Ye and Miao, 2013; Lensjø et al., 2017b). We quantified PNN density around PV+ cells in these layers using WFA staining (see Materials and Methods; Fig. 1). Following CNO treatment, the PNN of hM4Di–mCherry+ cells was strongly decreased compared with the PNN of the uninjected contralateral hemicortex (39.7 ± 4.4% of contralateral PNN density, n = 70 mCherry+/PV+ cells and n = 72 contralateral PV+ cells from 3 animals, p < 0.05; Fig. 3; Table 1). Conversely, no significant change of the PNN of hM4Di–mCherry+ cells was observed compared with contralateral PNN in PBS-treated animals (101.1 ± 8.5% of contralateral PNN density, n = 85 mCherry+ cells and n = 87 contralateral cells from 3 animals, p = 0.3; Fig. 3; Table 1). The significantly lower PNN density of hM4Di+ cells from CNO-treated animals compared with hM4Di+ cells from PBS-treated animals (Table 1) is illustrated in Figure 3. These results indicate that activation by CNO of hM4Di expressed in PV interneurons locally induces PNN regression in the adult visual cortex.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Chemogenetic paradigm and histologic analysis of PNN density in the V1 visual cortex. A, Four weeks after hemilateral AAV injection in the V1 cortex, DREADD- or PSAM-GlyR-expressing mice received four injections of relevant agonist or PBS starting at P58, and brains were processed for histochemistry at P61. B, Macrotome fluorescence-negative picture of a coronal section of mouse brain at the level of the visual cortex showing PNN staining with WFA. The superimposed section of the mouse brain atlas delineates the densely stained V1 area flanked by V2L and V2ML areas exhibiting faint PNN labeling. Throughout this study, analyses of PNN density were performed in layers IV-V of the V1 area as represented by the red rectangle. C, PNN density analyses were performed around PV-immunopositive cells, or around cells showing expression of both PV and the chemogenetic tool, as exemplified here for the hM4Di-mCherry fusion protein. D, In order to quantify PNN density, widefield fluorescence pictures were acquired (left), background-subtracted using the Subtract Background function of the ImageJ software (middle), and PNNs were delineated manually around the soma based on WFA staining intensity (right, red lines), to create ring-shaped ROIs using the XOR function of ImageJ. Scale bars: C, D, 20 µm.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Targeted expression of DREADD hM4Di in PV interneurons. A, Stereotaxic injection of Cre-dependent AAV encoding hM4Di fused to mCherry in the visual cortex of PV-Cre mice. Macrotome fluorescence picture showing expression of hM4Di-mCherry revealed by anti-RFP immunohistochemistry 5 weeks after injection. The superimposed section of the mouse brain atlas represents the V1 area. B, Confocal fluorescence images acquired in the V1 cortex after dual immunostaining showing hM4Di-mCherry expression in PV-positive cells. Scale bar, 100 µm.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Targeted inhibition of PV interneurons using DREADD hM4Di induces PNN regression. Confocal fluorescence images acquired in the V1 cortex illustrate the PNN (WFA) surrounding hM4Di-expressing PV interneurons in layers IV-V after PBS or CNO treatment of the mice. Note the low PNN density around hM4Di+ cells after CNO treatment, as exemplified in high-magnification images. Scale bars: left, 100 µm; right, 10 µm. Plot of PNN density around PV+ (contralateral uninjected hemicortex) and hM4Di+/PV+ (ipsilateral injected) cells in the V1 cortex normalized for each mouse to mean density in contralateral hemicortex. Indicated in bars are the number of cells analyzed in 3 CNO-treated and 3 PBS-treated mice. *Significantly different from other conditions.

The DREADD hM4Di is likely to inhibit GABA release from PV interneurons through effects at somatodendritic and axon terminal levels (Kruglikov and Rudy, 2008; Alexander et al., 2009; Stachniak et al., 2014), with a disinhibitory effect on network activities. Hence, PNN regression may result from moderate inhibition of PV interneurons leading to mild changes in network activity patterns, or from unbalanced network excitation because of marked disinhibition of excitatory neurons. To investigate these possibilities, we characterized acute electrophysiological effects of CNO in hM4Di-expressing mice.

CNO treatment results in moderate inhibition of hM4Di-expressing PV interneurons

We studied the effect of CNO (0.5 μm) (Alexander et al., 2009) on the excitability of hM4Di-expressing PV interneurons using patch-clamp recordings in acute slices of visual cortex (see Materials and Methods). Expression of hM4Di did not conspicuously alter electrophysiological properties of PV interneurons in the absence of CNO (Cauli et al., 1997). CNO application elicited a hyperpolarization (from −66.8 ± 0.5 mV in control to −71.6 ± 0.5 mV in CNO, p < 0.05) and a decrease in input resistance (from 152.9 ± 13.6 mΩ in control to 128.6 ± 10.7 mΩ in CNO, p < 0.05, n = 8 PV cells; Fig. 4A; Table 2), as reported previously (Alexander et al., 2009). This effect was associated with an increase in rheobase (from 143 ± 16 pA in control to 191 ± 23 pA in CNO, p < 0.05; Fig. 4A; Table 2). These results indicate that activation of hM4Di by CNO can inhibit PV neurons by decreasing their somatodendritic excitability. We next investigated acute CNO effects on network activities in V1 using EEG recordings in the hemicortex of awake mice expressing hM4Di in PV interneurons (see Materials and Methods). After 1 h baseline recording in control conditions, a first intraperitoneal injection of PBS was performed, followed 1 h later by intraperitoneal injection of CNO. We found no evidence for CNO-induced unbalanced excitation of the network indicative of marked disinhibition (Fig. 4B). CNO injection induced a strong decrease of network oscillations in the mid-high γ frequency band (from 99.5 ± 5.2% of control in PBS to 58.7 ± 8.4% of control in CNO for the 55-95 Hz range, and from 94.9 ± 4.1% of control in PBS to 41.1 ± 7.7% of control in CNO for the 100-150 Hz range, n = 3 mice, p < 0.05; Fig. 4B; Table 3). We also observed a significant decrease in theta oscillations (from 105.7 ± 15.9% of control in PBS to 56.3 ± 22.3% of control in CNO, p < 0.05; Fig. 4B; Table 3), but no change in low-frequency γ or δ oscillations. PV interneurons play a key role in synchronizing cortical neuronal populations, notably at γ frequencies (Cardin et al., 2009). These results indicate that hM4Di activation by CNO induces moderate inhibition of PV cells associated with changes in network activity patterns in vivo, which could be the trigger of the observed PNN reduction.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

CNO decreases the excitability of hM4Di-expressing PV interneurons and reduces cortical γ oscillations. A, Patch-clamp recordings in cortical slices. Traces represent responses of a hM4Di-expressing interneuron to depolarizing current step in control conditions and on bath application of CNO (0.5 μm). CNO elicited a hyperpolarization of the membrane potential and an increase in the current needed to induce action potential firing. Plots represent parameters measured in hM4Di-expressing interneurons (n = 8). Note the large amplitude of the fast afterhyperpolarizing potentials, the quiescent periods between trains of action potentials, the modest input resistance, and the high rheobase value typical of fast-spiking PV interneurons. B, EEG recordings in the hM4Di-expressing visual hemicortex of awake PV-Cre mouse before and after consecutive intraperitoneal injections of PBS and CNO. The EEG signal was filtered to analyze oscillations in the δ 1-4 Hz, theta 6-10 Hz, γ low 30-50 Hz, γ mid 55-95 Hz, and γ high 100-150 Hz frequency ranges. Traces represent samples obtained from 1 mouse. Graphs represent mean results from 3 mice. *Significant differences.

Targeted excitation of glutamatergic neurons or PV interneurons does not alter adult PNN density

In order to explore disinhibition-induced network excitation as a cause of PNN regression, we selectively expressed the excitatory DREADD hM3Dq in either glutamatergic neurons or PV interneurons using the same paradigm as above in Emx1-Cre or PV-Cre mice, respectively (see Materials and Methods). We first verified that CNO (0.5 μm) enhanced the excitability of hM3Dq-expressing neurons using patch-clamp recordings of hM3Dq+ layer V pyramidal cells (n = 8) in cortical slices. CNO elicited a depolarization (from −66.1 ± 0.9 mV in control to −63.9 ± 1.4 mV in CNO, p < 0.05; Fig. 5A; Table 2) and an increase in input resistance (from 139.8 ± 12.5 mΩ in control to 173.2 ± 10.6 mΩ in CNO, p < 0.05; Fig. 5A; Table 2) of these neurons, accompanied by a decrease in rheobase (from 60 ± 3 pA in control to 38 ± 3 pA in CNO, p < 0.05; Fig. 5A; Table 2). These results confirm that CNO enhances the excitability of hM3Dq-expressing neurons.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Targeted excitation of glutamatergic or PV neurons using hM3Dq does not alter PNN density. A, Patch-clamp recordings in cortical slices. Traces represent responses of an hM3Dq-expressing layer V pyramidal neuron to depolarizing current steps in control conditions and on bath application of CNO (0.5 μm). CNO application elicited a depolarization of the membrane potential and a decrease of the current needed to induce action potential firing. Plots represent electrophysiological parameters measured in control and CNO conditions in hM3Dq-expressing neurons (n = 8). *Significant differences. B, Confocal fluorescence images illustrate the PNN (WFA) surrounding PV+ cells in the vicinity of hM3Dq-expressing excitatory neurons in layers IV-V of the V1 cortex of mice treated with PBS or CNO. For better visualization, top panels represent WFA and anti-PV labeling separately from hM3Dq-mCherry-positive excitatory neurons visible on bottom panels. Scale bar, 100 µm. Plot of PNN density around PV+ cells ipsilateral and contralateral to hM3Dq expression in the V1 cortex normalized for each mouse to mean density in contralateral hemicortex. Indicated in bars are the number of cells analyzed in 3 CNO-treated and 3 PBS-treated mice. C, Top confocal fluorescence images represent hM3Dq-mCherry expression in PV+ cells of the V1 cortex 5 weeks after injection of corresponding Cre-dependent AAV in a PV-Cre mouse. Bottom confocal fluorescence images represent the PNN (WFA) surrounding hM3Dq+ PV interneurons in layers IV-V after PBS or CNO treatment of the mice. Scale bars, 100 µm. Plot of PNN density around PV+ (contralateral uninjected hemicortex) and hM3Dq+/PV+ (ipsilateral injected) cells. Indicated in bars are the number of cells analyzed in 3 CNO-treated and 3 PBS-treated mice.

We next probed the effect of in vivo activation of hM3Dq-expressing glutamatergic neurons in V1 on the PNN surrounding PV interneurons. Neither CNO nor PBS treatment significantly changed PNN density around PV+ cells in the ipsilateral hM3Dq-expressing hemicortex compared with the uninjected contralateral hemicortex (Fig. 5B; Table 1). We also tested the effect of in vivo activation of hM3Dq-expressing PV interneurons in V1 on their PNN. Neither CNO nor PBS treatment significantly changed the density of the PNN around hM3Dq+/PV+ cells compared with contralateral PV+ cells (Fig. 5C; Table 1). These results show that enhancing cortical network excitation does not trigger PNN regression in the adult, and suggest that CNO-induced PNN regression around hM4Di+ PV interneurons did not result from disinhibition-induced excitation of the cortical network.

Electrical silencing of PV interneurons triggers PNN regression in the adult visual cortex

The DREADD hM4Di is coupled to Gi intracellular signaling and thus results in both electrophysiological and metabotropic effects. In order to assess electrical silencing of PV interneurons as a trigger of PNN decrease, and rule out involvement of Gi-dependent metabotropic effects, we used an alternative chemogenetic tool, the chloride channel PSAM-GlyR exclusively activated by the agonist PSEM89S (Magnus et al., 2011) coexpressed with GFP, to inhibit PV interneurons in the same paradigm as above (see Materials and Methods). We found that 82% of GFP+ cells were PV+ (n = 75 of 92, not shown), consistent with efficient expression of PSAM-GlyR in PV interneurons. Following PSEM89S treatment, the density of the PNN surrounding PSAM-GlyR-GFP+/PV+ cells in layers IV-V was largely decreased as compared with the PNN of contralateral PV+ cells (51.0 ± 4.6% of contralateral PNN density, n = 110 GFP+ cells and n = 119 contralateral cells from 3 animals, p < 0.05; Fig. 6; Table 1). PNN density around GFP+ cells did not significantly differ from contralateral PNN in PBS-treated animals (Fig. 6; Table 1). These results indicate that PNN regression in the adult visual cortex can be triggered by electrical silencing of PV interneurons.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Silencing of PV interneurons by PSAM-GlyR induces PNN regression. Confocal fluorescence images in the V1 cortex illustrate the PNN (WFA) surrounding PSAM-GlyR+ cells after mice treatment with PBS or with the PSAM-GlyR agonist PSEM89S. Note the low PNN density around PSAM-GlyR+ cells after PSEM treatment, as exemplified in high-magnification images. Scale bars: left, 100 µm; right, 10 µm. Plot of PNN density around PV+ (contralateral uninjected hemicortex) and PSAM-GlyR+/PV+ (ipsilateral injected) cells in the V1 cortex. Indicated in bars are the number of cells analyzed in 3 PSEM-treated and 3 PBS-treated mice. *Significantly different from other conditions.

We next reasoned that PV interneuron silencing can, in principle, also be achieved by decreasing their synaptic excitation. We thus targeted expression of hM4Di to inhibit excitatory neurons in the V1 area. CNO treatment significantly reduced the PNN of PV+ cells in the ipsilateral hM4Di-expressing hemicortex compared with contralateral PNN (68.9 ± 4.9% of contralateral PNN density, n = 122 ipsilateral and n = 130 contralateral PV+ cells from 4 animals, p < 0.05; Fig. 7; Table 1). PBS treatment had no significant effect on PNN density (Fig. 7; Table 1). These data indicate that a decrease in cortical network excitation induces PNN regression in the adult visual cortex, and are consistent with the hypothesis that PV interneuron activity may play a key role in this process.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Targeted inhibition of excitatory neurons by hM4Di induces PNN regression. Confocal fluorescence images illustrate the PNN (WFA) surrounding PV+ cells in the vicinity of hM4Di-expressing excitatory neurons in layers IV-V of the V1 cortex of mice treated with PBS or CNO. Note the low PNN density around PV+ cells after CNO treatment, as exemplified in high-magnification images. Scale bars: left, 100 µm; right, 10 µm. Plot of PNN density around PV+ cells ipsilateral and contralateral to hM4Di expression normalized for each mouse to mean density in contralateral hemicortex. Indicated in bars are the number of cells analyzed in 4 CNO-treated and 3 PBS-treated mice. *Significantly different from other conditions.

Our results collectively suggest that PNN density is regulated in the adult cortex by network activity changes that can be triggered by modulating the electrical activity of PV interneurons.

The PNN around each PV interneuron may be regulated individually

During histochemical analyses of CNO-treated mice, we noticed that hM4Di– PV interneurons had dense PNNs, whereas the PNN of neighboring hM4Di+ cells was reduced (for examples, see Fig. 8A). This suggests that the PNN around each PV interneuron is regulated individually. In order to test this hypothesis, we compared PNN density within pairs of hM4Di+ and hM4Di– PV interneuron neighbors located at short distance from each other in the V1 area (maximal distance 106 µm; see Materials and Methods; Fig. 8B). We verified that PNN density around hM4Di– cells was higher than around hM4Di+ cells (WFA staining intensity 85.1 ± 5.5% of hM4Di– cells, n = 21 cell pairs from 3 animals; Fig. 8B). We next plotted WFA staining intensity of hM4Di– cells against that of hM4Di+ cells for each PV interneuron pair (Fig. 8B). The plot was skewed toward higher WFA staining around hM4Di– cells, consistent with hM4Di effect on the PNN. Linear regression analysis yielded a slope of 0.2, which did not significantly differ from the zero slope value expected from independence between WFA staining intensities of hM4Di+/PV+ and hM4Di–/PV+ cells (p = 0.12). These results suggest that PNN density around each PV interneuron is regulated independently of that of its PV cell neighbors.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

The PNN around each PV interneuron may be regulated individually. A, Examples of the high PNN density (arrows) observed around hM4Di–, or weakly hM4Di+ PV interneurons compared with the low PNN density observed around their PV+ neighbors robustly expressing hM4Di in the V1 cortex of a CNO-treated mouse. Scale bar, 20 µm. B, Comparison of PNN density within pairs of hM4Di+ and hM4Di– closest neighbors PV+ cells: selection criterion (left), individual and mean WFA intensity (middle, *significant difference), and scatter plot of WFA intensity for PV interneuron pairs (right, n = 21). The slope of linear regression did not significantly differ from zero. C, Violin plots showing distributions of individual gene expression in 10,100 single cells from primary visual cortex of P56 mice. Data are from the Allen Institute. Cells are from subclasses segregated in Tasic et al. (2018) (20): GABAergic (Lamp5, Vip, Sst, and Pvalb), glutamatergic (layers 2/3 and 5 IT intratelencephalic, layer 4, layer 5 PT pyramidal tract) and astrocytes. Rows represent individual gene expression across cell types. Values (number per million reads) are displayed on a log10 scale normalized to maximum expression value for each gene (right column). Black dots represent median values. Markers: Gad2, glutamate decarboxylase; Slc17a7, vesicular glutamate transporter; Gja1, gap junction alpha1; Pvalb, PV. Lecticans: Acan, aggrecan; Bcan, brevican; Ncan, neurocan. PNN linkers: Hapln, hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein; Ptprr and Ptprz1, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor types R and Z1; Tnr, tenascin R. Proteases: Adam, A Disintegrin And Metalloproteases; Mmp9, membrane metallopeptidase 9; Mme, neprilysin; Tll1, tolloid-like metallopeptidase; Adamts, A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease with Thrombospondin motif; Prss23, serine protease 23.

PV interneurons express multiple genes involved in synthesis and degradation of the PNN (Okaty et al., 2009; Rossier et al., 2015). We thus searched through published transcriptomic database of single cells collected from the primary visual cortex of P56 mice (Tasic et al., 2018) for the expression of genes that may enable individual cortical neural cells to contribute to the local regulation of individual PNN density. Figure 8C shows expression levels of selected PNN lecticans, linkers, and proteases in 10,100 cells comprising major interneuron and layers II-V excitatory neuron types as previously defined (Tasic et al., 2018), as well as astrocytes. The expression profiles of PNN-related genes differed between cell types, with the largest array of genes expressed by PV interneurons. Strikingly, all lecticans and PNN linker mRNAs were present in PV interneurons, which preferentially express Acan and weakly express Ptprz1 mainly found in astrocytes (Maurel et al., 1994; Rossier et al., 2015). PV interneurons strikingly differed from other cell types in expressing significant levels of all tested proteases, except Mmp9 mainly observed in a subtype of layer V excitatory neurons. Notably, secreted proteases were preferentially expressed by PV interneurons consistent with earlier observations (Rossier et al., 2015). These results confirm that, among cortical cell types, adult PV interneurons express the largest set of key genes enabling individual cells to regulate locally the accumulation and degradation of the PNN.

Discussion

We tested the effects of targeted chemogenetic modulation of PV interneurons and excitatory neurons on PNN density around PV interneurons in the adult visual cortex. Inhibition of PV interneurons using the Gi-coupled hM4Di or the chloride channel PSAM-GlyR, as well as inhibition of glutamatergic neurons, induced PNN regression. Inhibition of PV interneurons did not elicit unbalanced excitation of the network and excitation of glutamatergic neurons or of PV interneurons did not alter PNN density, suggesting that disinhibition-induced network excitation was not the cause of PNN regression. We also found that the PNN of hM4Di-expressing PV cells was reduced compared with the PNN of their hM4Di– neighbors, and that PV interneurons express genes enabling control of their own PNN density. Our results indicate that a decreased activity of PV interneurons, and resulting changes in network activity, can trigger PNN regression locally in the adult cortex, and suggest that individual PV cells can contribute to the regulation of their own PNN.

Targeted chemogenetic modulation of PV interneurons or excitatory neurons

Cre-dependent viral transduction resulted in robust and selective expression of chemogenetic actuators, consistent with previous studies (Gorski et al., 2002; Hippenmeyer et al., 2005; Alexander et al., 2009; Krashes et al., 2011; Magnus et al., 2011). Cell type-specific targeting was assessed by immunochemistry and patch-clamp recordings of transduced neurons, which all exhibited electrophysiological properties typical of PV interneurons or glutamatergic neurons (Connors and Gutnick, 1990; Cauli et al., 1997). Our results exclude DREADD-independent effects of CNO (Gomez et al., 2017) as the cause of PNN changes: (1) CNO was ineffective in hM3Dq-expressing mice; (2) CNO induced PNN regression in the hM4Di-expressing hemicortex but not contralaterally; (3) CNO and PSEM treatments both effectively reduced PNN around PV interneurons expressing their cognate chemogenetic actuator; and (4) our electrophysiological recordings of acute CNO effects confirm its efficiency in modulating somatodendritic excitability of DREADD-expressing neurons (Alexander et al., 2009; Krashes et al., 2011; but see Stachniak et al., 2014; Gomez et al., 2017). Hence, the PNN changes we observed stem from specific chemogenetic ligand/actuator interactions eliciting a decrease in excitability of selectively targeted cell types.

PNN regression is triggered by decreased activity of PV interneurons, rather than by disinhibition-induced network excitation

Targeted modulation of PV interneurons using hM4Di reinstates visual plasticity in the mouse cortex after closure of the critical period (Kuhlman et al., 2013). Consistent with our working hypothesis, we found that this chemogenetic paradigm induced PNN regression in the adult visual cortex. Several observations indicate that this effect, also obtained on inhibition of PV cells by the chloride channel PSAM-GlyR, was associated with the reduction of the electrical activity of these interneurons. Indeed, acute hM4Di activation reduced the excitability of PV cells in cortical slices, consistent with their reduced responsiveness to visual stimuli in vivo (Kuhlman et al., 2013), and decreased cortical γ oscillations, which critically rely on these interneurons' activity (Cardin et al., 2009). Conversely, our EEG recordings showed no evidence for unbalanced network excitation (e.g., epileptiform activities) on targeted inhibition of PV interneurons, and targeted excitation of either glutamatergic neurons or PV interneurons using hM3Dq did not alter PNN density. Hence, our results indicate that PV interneuron silencing, rather than disinhibition-induced network excitation, can lead to adult PNN regression, and that not all network activity changes can trigger this effect. In support of this interpretation, a reduction in PV interneuron function has been proposed to underlie the effects of several drugs and of dark exposure on adult PNN density or cortical plasticity (Hensch and Quinlan, 2018). Along this interpretation also, we found that chemogenetic inhibition of excitatory neurons, which presumably reduces the activity of the cortical network including PV cells, similarly resulted in PNN regression. It is noteworthy, however, that the activity of PV interneurons strongly influences that of the local visuocortical network, as evidenced by the decrease in cortical oscillations observed in our EEG recordings. Indeed, PV interneurons receive and feedback onto sensory thalamic inputs, are densely interconnected with excitatory neurons and among one another, and form powerful autapses (Bacci et al., 2003; Kloc and Maffei, 2014; Faini et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019). Hence, adult PNN regression triggered by inhibition of PV interneurons or excitatory neurons may require changes in synaptic drive and network activity patterns that stem from targeted chemogenetic inhibition, but involve other neural cell types.

Activity-dependent regulation of PNN density in the adult

The accumulation of PNN around PV neurons during the juvenile period of postnatal maturation is known to be activity-dependent, and has been suggested to involve both neurons and glia (Hensch, 2005; Dityatev et al., 2007, 2010; Giamanco and Matthews, 2012; Kwok et al., 2012; Hensch and Quinlan, 2018; Testa et al., 2019). Some of the activity-dependent factors that regulate juvenile PNN accumulation may also be involved in the regulation of adult PNN density. Among these factors, Ca2+ entry through both Ca2+-permeable AMPARs, characteristically expressed in PV interneurons (Geiger et al., 1995; Angulo et al., 1997) and L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, is required for juvenile PNN accumulation (Dityatev et al., 2007). Both conductances control Ca2+ entry into PV interneurons (Goldberg et al., 2003a, 2003b), which is thus likely to decrease on chemogenetic inhibition of excitatory neurons (because of reduced excitatory drive onto PV cells) or of PV neurons (as assessed by their reduced Ca2+ responses to visual inputs in vivo) (Kuhlman et al., 2013). Decreased Ca2+ entry into PV neurons may thus trigger the contribution of these cells to PNN regression in the adult. Yet, a change of OTX2 import in PV interneurons, which controls juvenile PNN accumulation, may also contribute to adult PNN regression in our experimental conditions. Indeed, OTX2 accumulation in PV interneurons is activity-dependent, and the reduction of OTX2 import in the adult induces PNN regression and reinstates juvenile plasticity (Sugiyama et al., 2008; Beurdeley et al., 2012). In addition to PV neurons, our targeted chemogenetic inhibition paradigms likely change the activity of multiple cortical cell types via network effects because of modifications of synaptic drive and/or population synchrony. Glial and neuronal cell types other than PV neurons may thus critically contribute to activity-dependent PNN regulation in the adult, as reported for glial cells in the control of juvenile PNN accumulation (Giamanco and Matthews, 2012). Hence, PNN regulation in the adult may involve some of the activity-dependent mechanisms that regulate juvenile PNN accumulation.

PNNs may be regulated individually in the adult

The present study provides evidence for the activity-dependent regulation of individual PNNs independently of their neighbors. The possibility that PV interneurons can directly contribute to this process is substantiated by the present analysis of earlier single-cell transcriptomic data (Tasic et al., 2018). Indeed, we confirmed that individual PV cells express many of the essential PNN lecticans and linkers, as well as membrane and secreted proteases (Okaty et al., 2009; Dityatev et al., 2010; Kwok et al., 2012; Ferrer-Ferrer and Dityatev, 2018), including established proteoglycanases (Kelwick et al., 2015); and may thus modulate the density of their own PNN. Indeed, post-translational maturation of proteoglycans by PV cells has been shown to control PNN density (Miyata et al., 2012). Likewise, activity-dependent modifications in the expression, maturation, or exocytosis of PNN constituents or proteases by adult PV cells may change the synthesis or degradation rate, and thus the density of their PNN. Activity-dependent transcriptional changes in PNN-related genes observed around the juvenile period of PNN formation (McRae et al., 2007; Carulli et al., 2010; Giamanco and Matthews, 2012; Gunner et al., 2019) are unlikely to account for the possible contribution of PV neurons to adult PNN regulation. Indeed, transient silencing of mature PV interneurons for 48 h does not induce large modifications of their transcriptome, except for genes involved in protein transport (Miller et al., 2011). This suggests that the activity-dependent contribution of PV cells to adult PNN regulation may result primarily from modification in the cellular trafficking of PNN constituents or PNN proteases. Alternatively, adult PNN regulation may rely on activity-dependent changes in the supply of some PNN constituents or proteases by other cell types (e.g., Neurocan or ADAM and Mmp9 proteases from excitatory neurons, or PNN linkers Hapln1 and Ptprz1 from astrocytes).

Multiple earlier studies indicate that PNN removal renders adult cortical network permissive for high circuit plasticity. The targeted chemogenetic paradigm used in the present study is known to reinstate visual plasticity in the young adult after closure of the critical period (Kuhlman et al., 2013). Our results thus raise the possibility that adult PV neurons may contribute to the local regulation of PNN-dependent plasticity, and thereby to the point-by-point tuning of cortical network properties in the adult.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Grant/Award ANR-15-CE16-0010. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank Drs. Chris Magnus and Scott Sternson for the kind gift of chemogenetic PSAM-PSEM tools; the Allen Institute for sharing data and analysis tools; Drs. Maria Cecilia Angulo and Alberto Bacci for advice throughout this study; and Bernadette Hanesse and the IBPS Cell Imaging and Animal Facilities for their valuable help.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • *Correspondence should be addressed to Bertrand Lambolez at bertrand.lambolez{at}upmc.fr

SfN exclusive license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alexander GM,
    2. Rogan SC,
    3. Abbas AI,
    4. Armbruster BN,
    5. Pei Y,
    6. Allen JA,
    7. Nonneman RJ,
    8. Hartmann J,
    9. Moy SS,
    10. Nicolelis MA,
    11. McNamara JO,
    12. Roth BL
    (2009) Remote control of neuronal activity in transgenic mice expressing evolved G protein-coupled receptors. Neuron 63:27–39. pmid:19607790 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Angulo MC,
    2. Lambolez B,
    3. Audinat E,
    4. Hestrin S,
    5. Rossier J
    (1997) Subunit composition, kinetic, and permeation properties of AMPA receptors in single neocortical nonpyramidal cells. J Neurosci 17:6685–6696. pmid:9254681 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-17-06685.1997
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Angulo MC,
    2. Staiger JF,
    3. Rossier J,
    4. Audinat E
    (1999) Developmental synaptic changes increase the range of integrative capabilities of an identified excitatory neocortical connection. J Neurosci 19:1566–1576. pmid:10024344 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-05-01566.1999
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Ascoli GA,
    2. Alonso-Nanclares L,
    3. Anderson SA,
    4. Barrionuevo G,
    5. Benavides-Piccione R,
    6. Burkhalter A,
    7. Buzsáki G,
    8. Cauli B,
    9. Defelipe J,
    10. Fairén A,
    11. Feldmeyer D,
    12. Fishell G,
    13. Fregnac Y,
    14. Freund TF,
    15. Gardner D,
    16. Gardner EP,
    17. Goldberg JH,
    18. Helmstaedter M,
    19. Hestrin S,
    20. Karube F, et al
    . (2008) Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:557–568. doi:10.1038/nrn2402 pmid:18568015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Beurdeley M,
    2. Spatazza J,
    3. Lee HH,
    4. Sugiyama S,
    5. Bernard C,
    6. Di Nardo AA,
    7. Hensch TK,
    8. Prochiantz A
    (2012) Otx2 binding to perineuronal nets persistently regulates plasticity in the mature visual cortex. J Neurosci 32:9429–9437. pmid:22764251 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0394-12.2012
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Bacci A,
    2. Huguenard JR,
    3. Prince DA
    (2003) Functional autaptic neurotransmission in fast-spiking interneurons: a novel form of feedback inhibition in the neocortex. J Neurosci 23:859–866. pmid:12574414 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-03-00859.2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Cardin JA,
    2. Carlén M,
    3. Meletis K,
    4. Knoblich U,
    5. Zhang F,
    6. Deisseroth K,
    7. Tsai LH,
    8. Moore CI
    (2009) Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature 459:663–667. pmid:19396156 doi:10.1038/nature08002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Carulli D,
    2. Pizzorusso T,
    3. Kwok JC,
    4. Putignano E,
    5. Poli A,
    6. Forostyak S,
    7. Andrews MR,
    8. Deepa SS,
    9. Glant TT,
    10. Fawcett JW
    (2010) Animals lacking link protein have attenuated perineuronal nets and persistent plasticity. Brain 133:2331–2347. pmid:20566484 doi:10.1093/brain/awq145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Cauli B,
    2. Audinat E,
    3. Lambolez B,
    4. Angulo MC,
    5. Ropert N,
    6. Tsuzuki K,
    7. Hestrin S,
    8. Rossier J
    (1997) Molecular and physiological diversity of cortical nonpyramidal cells. J Neurosci 17:3894–3906. pmid:9133407 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-10-03894.1997
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Connors BW,
    2. Gutnick MJ
    (1990) Intrinsic firing patterns of diverse neocortical neurons. Trends Neurosci 13:99–104. pmid:1691879 doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90185-D
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Dityatev A,
    2. Brückner G,
    3. Dityateva G,
    4. Grosche J,
    5. Kleene R,
    6. Schachner M
    (2007) Activity-dependent formation and functions of chondroitin sulfate-rich extracellular matrix of perineuronal nets. Dev Neurobiol 67:570–588. pmid:17443809 doi:10.1002/dneu.20361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Dityatev A,
    2. Seidenbecher CI,
    3. Schachner M
    (2010) Compartmentalization from the outside: the extracellular matrix and functional microdomains in the brain. Trends Neurosci 33:503–512. pmid:20832873 doi:10.1016/j.tins.2010.08.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Fagiolini M,
    2. Fritschy JM,
    3. Löw K,
    4. Möhler H,
    5. Rudolph U,
    6. Hensch TK
    (2004) Specific GABAA circuits for visual cortical plasticity. Science 303:1681–1683. pmid:15017002 doi:10.1126/science.1091032
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Faini G,
    2. Aguirre A,
    3. Landi S,
    4. Lamers D,
    5. Pizzorusso T,
    6. Ratto GM,
    7. Deleuze C,
    8. Bacci A
    (2018) Perineuronal nets control visual input via thalamic recruitment of cortical PV interneurons. Elife 7:e41520. pmid:30561327 doi:10.7554/eLife.41520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Ferrer-Ferrer M,
    2. Dityatev A
    (2018) Shaping synapses by the neural extracellular matrix. Front Neuroanat 12:40. pmid:29867379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Geiger JR,
    2. Melcher T,
    3. Koh DS,
    4. Sakmann B,
    5. Seeburg PH,
    6. Jonas P,
    7. Monyer H
    (1995) Relative abundance of subunit mRNAs determines gating and Ca2+ permeability of AMPA receptors in principal neurons and interneurons in rat CNS. Neuron 15:193–204. pmid:7619522 doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90076-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Giamanco KA,
    2. Matthews RT
    (2012) Deconstructing the perineuronal net: cellular contributions and molecular composition of the neuronal extracellular matrix. Neuroscience 218:367–384. pmid:22659016 doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.05.055
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Goldberg JH,
    2. Tamas G,
    3. Yuste R
    (2003a) Ca2+ imaging of mouse neocortical interneurone dendrites: Ia-type K+ channels control action potential backpropagation. J Physiol 551:49–65. pmid:12844506 doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.042580
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Goldberg JH,
    2. Yuste R,
    3. Tamas G
    (2003b) Ca2+ imaging of mouse neocortical interneurone dendrites: contribution of Ca2+-permeable AMPA and NMDA receptors to subthreshold Ca2+dynamics. J Physiol 551:67–78. pmid:12844507 doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.042598
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Gomez JL,
    2. Bonaventura J,
    3. Lesniak W,
    4. Mathews WB,
    5. Sysa-Shah P,
    6. Rodriguez LA,
    7. Ellis RJ,
    8. Richie CT,
    9. Harvey BK,
    10. Dannals RF,
    11. Pomper MG,
    12. Bonci A,
    13. Michaelides M
    (2017) Chemogenetics revealed: DREADD occupancy and activation via converted clozapine. Science 357:503–507. pmid:28774929 doi:10.1126/science.aan2475
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Gorski JA,
    2. Talley T,
    3. Qiu M,
    4. Puelles L,
    5. Rubenstein JL,
    6. Jones KR
    (2002) Cortical excitatory neurons and glia, but not GABAergic neurons, are produced in the Emx1-expressing lineage. J Neurosci 22:6309–6314. pmid:12151506 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06309.2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Gunner G,
    2. Cheadle L,
    3. Johnson KM,
    4. Ayata P,
    5. Badimon A,
    6. Mondo E,
    7. Nagy MA,
    8. Liu L,
    9. Bemiller SM,
    10. Kim KW,
    11. Lira SA,
    12. Lamb BT,
    13. Tapper AR,
    14. Ransohoff RM,
    15. Greenberg ME,
    16. Schaefer A,
    17. Schafer DP
    (2019) Sensory lesioning induces microglial synapse elimination via ADAM10 and fractalkine signaling. Nat Neurosci 22:1075–1088. pmid:31209379 doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0419-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Harauzov A,
    2. Spolidoro M,
    3. DiCristo G,
    4. De Pasquale R,
    5. Cancedda L,
    6. Pizzorusso T,
    7. Viegi A,
    8. Berardi N,
    9. Maffei L
    (2010) Reducing intracortical inhibition in the adult visual cortex promotes ocular dominance plasticity. J Neurosci 30:361–371. pmid:20053917 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2233-09.2010
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Hay YA,
    2. Naudé J,
    3. Faure P,
    4. Lambolez B
    (2019) Target interneuron preference in thalamocortical pathways determines the temporal structure of cortical responses. Cereb Cortex 29:2815–2831. pmid:30059985 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Hensch TK,
    2. Fagiolini M,
    3. Mataga N,
    4. Stryker MP,
    5. Baekkeskov S,
    6. Kash SF
    (1998) Local GABA circuit control of experience-dependent plasticity in developing visual cortex. Science 282:1504–1508. pmid:9822384 doi:10.1126/science.282.5393.1504
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Hensch TK
    (2005) Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:877–888. pmid:16261181 doi:10.1038/nrn1787
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Hensch TK,
    2. Quinlan EM
    (2018) Critical periods in amblyopia. Visual Neuroscience, 35:E014. doi:10.1017/S0952523818000020 pmid:29905116
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Hippenmeyer S,
    2. Vrieseling E,
    3. Sigrist M,
    4. Portmann T,
    5. Laengle C,
    6. Ladle DR,
    7. Arber S
    (2005) A developmental switch in the response of DRG neurons to ETS transcription factor signaling. PLoS Biol 3:e159. pmid:15836427 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Kelwick R,
    2. Desanlis I,
    3. Wheeler GN,
    4. Edwards DR
    (2015) The ADAMTS (A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase with Thrombospondin motifs) family. Genome Biol 16:113. pmid:26025392 doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0676-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Kloc ML,
    2. Maffei A
    (2014) Cell type-specific properties of thalamocortical inputs in rodent primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 34:13455–13465. pmid:25392512
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Krashes MJ,
    2. Koda S,
    3. Ye C,
    4. Rogan SC,
    5. Adams AC,
    6. Cusher DS,
    7. Maratos-Flier E,
    8. Roth BL,
    9. Lowell BB
    (2011) Rapid, reversible activation of AgRP neurons drives feeding behavior in mice. J Clin Invest 121:1424–1428. pmid:21364278 doi:10.1172/JCI46229
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kruglikov I,
    2. Rudy B
    (2008) Perisomatic GABA release and thalamocortical integration onto neocortical excitatory cells are regulated by neuromodulators. Neuron 58:911–924. pmid:18579081 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Kuhlman SJ,
    2. Olivas ND,
    3. Tring E,
    4. Ikrar T,
    5. Xu X,
    6. Trachtenberg JT
    (2013) A disinhibitory microcircuit initiates critical period plasticity in the visual cortex. Nature 501:543–546. pmid:23975100 doi:10.1038/nature12485
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Kwok JC,
    2. Warren P,
    3. Fawcett JW
    (2012) Chondroitin sulfate: a key molecule in the brain matrix. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 44:582–586. pmid:22265655 doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2012.01.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Lee HH,
    2. Bernard C,
    3. Ye Z,
    4. Acampora D,
    5. Simeone A,
    6. Prochiantz A,
    7. Di Nardo AA,
    8. Hensch TK
    (2017) Genetic Otx2 mis-localization delays critical period plasticity across brain regions. Mol Psychiatry 22:680–688. pmid:28373687 doi:10.1038/mp.2017.1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Lensjø KK,
    2. Lepperød ME,
    3. Dick G,
    4. Hafting T,
    5. Fyhn M
    (2017a) Removal of perineuronal nets unlocks juvenile plasticity through network mechanisms of decreased inhibition and increased gamma activity. J Neurosci 37:1269–1283. pmid:28039374 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2504-16.2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Lensjø KK,
    2. Christensen AC,
    3. Tennøe S,
    4. Fyhn M,
    5. Hafting T
    (2017b) Differential expression and cell type specificity of perineuronal nets in hippocampus, medial entorhinal cortex, and visual cortex examined in the rat and mouse. eNeuro 4:ENEURO.0379-16.2017. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0379-16.2017
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Magnus CJ,
    2. Lee PH,
    3. Atasoy D,
    4. Su HH,
    5. Looger LL,
    6. Sternson SM
    (2011) Chemical and genetic engineering of selective ion channel-ligand interactions. Science 333:1292–1296. pmid:21885782 doi:10.1126/science.1206606
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Maurel P,
    2. Rauch U,
    3. Flad M,
    4. Margolis RK,
    5. Margolis RU
    (1994) Phosphacan, a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan of brain that interacts with neurons and neural cell-adhesion molecules, is an extracellular variant of a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2512–2516. pmid:7511813 doi:10.1073/pnas.91.7.2512
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. McRae PA,
    2. Rocco MM,
    3. Kelly G,
    4. Brumberg JC,
    5. Matthews RT
    (2007) Sensory deprivation alters aggrecan and perineuronal net expression in the mouse barrel cortex. J Neurosci 27:5405–5413. pmid:17507562 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5425-06.2007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Miller MN,
    2. Okaty BW,
    3. Kato S,
    4. Nelson SB
    (2011) Activity-dependent changes in the firing properties of neocortical fast-spiking interneurons in the absence of large changes in gene expression. Dev Neurobiol 71:62–70. pmid:21154910 doi:10.1002/dneu.20811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Miyata S,
    2. Komatsu Y,
    3. Yoshimura Y,
    4. Taya C,
    5. Kitagawa H
    (2012) Persistent cortical plasticity by upregulation of chondroitin 6-sulfation. Nat Neurosci 15:414–422. pmid:22246436 doi:10.1038/nn.3023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Okaty BW,
    2. Miller MN,
    3. Sugino K,
    4. Hempel CM,
    5. Nelson SB
    (2009) Transcriptional and electrophysiological maturation of neocortical fast-spiking GABAergic interneurons. J Neurosci 29:7040–7052. pmid:19474331 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0105-09.2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Paxinos G,
    2. Franklin KB
    (2004) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic.
  45. ↵
    1. Pizzorusso T,
    2. Medini P,
    3. Berardi N,
    4. Chierzi S,
    5. Fawcett JW,
    6. Maffei L
    (2002) Reactivation of ocular dominance plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science 298:1248–1251. pmid:12424383 doi:10.1126/science.1072699
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Rossier J,
    2. Bernard A,
    3. Cabungcal JH,
    4. Perrenoud Q,
    5. Savoye A,
    6. Gallopin T,
    7. Hawrylycz M,
    8. Cuénod M,
    9. Do K,
    10. Urban A,
    11. Lein ES
    (2015) Cortical fast-spiking parvalbumin interneurons enwrapped in the perineuronal net express the metallopeptidases Adamts8, Adamts15 and Neprilysin. Mol Psychiatry 20:154–161. pmid:25510509 doi:10.1038/mp.2014.162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Rudy B,
    2. Fishell G,
    3. Lee S,
    4. Hjerling-Leffler J
    (2011) Three groups of interneurons account for nearly 100% of neocortical GABAergic neurons. Dev Neurobiol 71:45–61. pmid:21154909 doi:10.1002/dneu.20853
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Sale A,
    2. Berardi N,
    3. Spolidoro M,
    4. Baroncelli L,
    5. Maffei L
    (2010) GABAergic inhibition in visual cortical plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci 4:10. pmid:20407586 doi:10.3389/fncel.2010.00010 pmid:20407586
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Sieu LA,
    2. Bergel A,
    3. Tiran E,
    4. Deffieux T,
    5. Pernot M,
    6. Gennisson JL,
    7. Tanter M,
    8. Cohen I
    (2015) EEG and functional ultrasound imaging in mobile rats. Nat Methods 12:831–834. pmid:26237228 doi:10.1038/nmeth.3506
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Stachniak TJ,
    2. Ghosh A,
    3. Sternson SM
    (2014) Chemogenetic synaptic silencing of neural circuits localizes a hypothalamus→midbrain pathway for feeding behavior. Neuron 82:797–808. pmid:24768300 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Sugiyama S,
    2. Di Nardo AA,
    3. Aizawa S,
    4. Matsuo I,
    5. Volovitch M,
    6. Prochiantz A,
    7. Hensch TK
    (2008) Experience-dependent transfer of Otx2 homeoprotein into the visual cortex activates postnatal plasticity. Cell 134:508–520. pmid:18692473 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.054
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tasic B,
    2. Yao Z,
    3. Graybuck LT,
    4. Smith KA,
    5. Nguyen TN,
    6. Bertagnolli D,
    7. Goldy J,
    8. Garren E,
    9. Economo MN,
    10. Viswanathan S,
    11. Penn O,
    12. Bakken T,
    13. Menon V,
    14. Miller J,
    15. Fong O,
    16. Hirokawa KE,
    17. Lathia K,
    18. Rimorin C,
    19. Tieu M,
    20. Larsen R, et al
    . (2018) Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas. Nature 563:72–78. pmid:30382198 doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0654-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Testa D,
    2. Prochiantz A,
    3. Di Nardo AA
    (2019) Perineuronal nets in brain physiology and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol 89:125–135. pmid:30273653 doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.09.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Ueno H,
    2. Takao K,
    3. Suemitsu S,
    4. Murakami S,
    5. Kitamura N,
    6. Wani K,
    7. Okamoto M,
    8. Aoki S,
    9. Ishihara T
    (2018) Age-dependent and region-specific alteration of parvalbumin neurons and perineuronal nets in the mouse cerebral cortex. Neurochem Int 112:59–70. pmid:29126935 doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2017.11.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Kloc M,
    3. Maher E,
    4. Erisir A,
    5. Maffei A
    (2019) Presynaptic GABAA receptors modulate thalamocortical inputs in layer 4 of Rat V1. Cereb Cortex 29:921–936. pmid:29373653 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx364
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Ye Q,
    2. Miao QL
    (2013) Experience-dependent development of perineuronal nets and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan receptors in mouse visual cortex. Matrix Biol 32:352–363. pmid:123597636 doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2013.04.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 41 (27)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 41, Issue 27
7 Jul 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulation of Perineuronal Nets in the Adult Cortex by the Activity of the Cortical Network
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Regulation of Perineuronal Nets in the Adult Cortex by the Activity of the Cortical Network
Gabrielle Devienne, Sandrine Picaud, Ivan Cohen, Juliette Piquet, Ludovic Tricoire, Damien Testa, Ariel A. Di Nardo, Jean Rossier, Bruno Cauli, Bertrand Lambolez
Journal of Neuroscience 7 July 2021, 41 (27) 5779-5790; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0434-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Regulation of Perineuronal Nets in the Adult Cortex by the Activity of the Cortical Network
Gabrielle Devienne, Sandrine Picaud, Ivan Cohen, Juliette Piquet, Ludovic Tricoire, Damien Testa, Ariel A. Di Nardo, Jean Rossier, Bruno Cauli, Bertrand Lambolez
Journal of Neuroscience 7 July 2021, 41 (27) 5779-5790; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0434-21.2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cerebral cortex
  • critical period plasticity
  • extracellular matrix
  • fast-spiking parvalbumin interneurons
  • perineuronal net

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • The amyloid precursor protein modulates the position and length of the axon initial segment
  • Cortical Parvalbumin-Positive Interneuron Development and Function Are Altered in the APC Conditional Knockout Mouse Model of Infantile and Epileptic Spasms Syndrome
  • Post-synaptic NMDA Receptor Expression Is Required for Visual Corticocollicular Projection Refinement in the Mouse Superior Colliculus
Show more Research Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • The amyloid precursor protein modulates the position and length of the axon initial segment
  • Cortical Parvalbumin-Positive Interneuron Development and Function Are Altered in the APC Conditional Knockout Mouse Model of Infantile and Epileptic Spasms Syndrome
  • Post-synaptic NMDA Receptor Expression Is Required for Visual Corticocollicular Projection Refinement in the Mouse Superior Colliculus
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.