Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

Neural Representations in the Prefrontal Cortex Are Task Dependent for Scene Attributes But Not for Scene Categories

Yaelan Jung and Dirk B. Walther
Journal of Neuroscience 25 August 2021, 41 (34) 7234-7245; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2816-20.2021
Yaelan Jung
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yaelan Jung
Dirk B. Walther
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dirk B. Walther
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A, Examples of scene images from four scene categories labeled as warm or cold (temperature property) and as noisy or quiet (sound-level property). B, Behavioral ratings of temperature and sound-level properties. C, Illustration of the image presentation in the main experiment. D, E, Image presentation in the temperature judgment condition (D) and in the sound-level judgment condition (E).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Decoding from the main experiment. A−C, Decoding of temperature (A), sound-level properties (B), and categories (C) of scenes in each ROI in the temperature judgment condition (orange bars) and in the sound-level judgment condition (green bars). D, Confusion matrices from category decoding: each row indicates the presented category (in order of beach, city, forest, and station), and each column indicates the predicted category. Diagonal boxes (with a pink frame) indicate the percentage of corrected predictions (rounded to the nearest integer). Dots in each figure represent individual data points. Error bars indicate SEM. Significance of the one-sample t-tests (one-tailed) was adjusted for multiple comparisons using FDR. *q < 0.05, ***q < 0.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    A, Left, Examples of the scene images and their CIELAB values. Right, Illustration of color-control regression analysis. B, Predicted temperature rating (from all three color channel values) plotted over the average temperature rating. Dots in the figure indicate the individual images used in the experiment. C, Decoding accuracies of temperature from the color-controlled analysis. Error bars indicate SEM. Error bars indicate SEM. Significance of the one-sample t-tests (one-tailed) was adjusted for multiple comparisons using FDR. #p (uncorrected) < 0.05.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Decoding of temperature property. A, Illustration of the stimuli presentation and the experiment design for the temperature localizer runs. B, Temperature of warm and cold stones before and after runs. C, Decoding of temperature from thermal sensations. D, Schematic of cross-decoding analysis across direct and indirect thermal percepts. E, Decoding accuracy of the cross-decoding analysis in the post-central sulcus and MFG. Dots in each figure represent individual data points. Error bars indicate SEM. Significance of the one-sample t-tests (one-tailed) was adjusted for multiple comparisons using FDR. *q < 0.05, #p (uncorrected) < 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Decoding of sound properties. A, Illustration of the design of the sound experiment, and amplitude of an exemplar of the noisy sound clips and an exemplar of the quiet sound clips used in the localizer experiment. B, Sound-level decoding accuracy in each ROI. C, Schematic of cross-decoding analysis across direct and indirect auditory percepts. D. Decoding performance of the cross-decoding analysis in IFG. Dots in each figure represent individual data points. Error bars indicate SEM. Significance of the one-sample t-tests (one-tailed) was adjusted for multiple comparisons using FDR. *q < 0.05, ***q < 0.001, #p (uncorrected) < 0.05.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    A, B, Searchlight maps of temperature and category decoding in the temperature judgment condition (A) and sound-level and category decoding in the sound-level judgment condition (B). Maps are thresholded at p < 0.05 and cluster-wise correction was conducted for multiple comparisons (minimal cluster size, 215). MNI coordinates: A: x = 20, y = −10, z = 15; B, x = −5, y = 32, z = 26.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Searchlight maps of cross-decoding analysis for temperature (A) and sound-level (B) decoding. Maps are thresholded at p < 0.05, and a cluster-wise correction was conducted for multiple comparisons (minimal cluster size, 215).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Mean of decoding accuracy and statistical analysis in each ROI for the temperature and the sound-level properties

    ROIDecoding of temperatureDecoding of sound-level
    Temperature conditionSound-level conditionTemperature conditionSound-level condition
    Meant statisticsqEffect sizeMeant statisticsqEffect sizeMeant statisticsqEffect sizeMeant statisticsqEffect size
    PPA58.752.670.010.6050.000.000.500.0058.752.100.120.4753.751.140.220.26
    S150.000.000.500.0052.630.810.210.18
    A146.25−1.000.84−0.2250.000.000.500.00
    MFG62.502.940.020.6650.000.000.500.0055.000.940.450.2162.502.520.030.56
    SFG51.250.270.490.0643.75−1.160.87−0.2650.000.000.770.0051.250.250.500.06
    IFG56.251.230.200.2753.750.720.600.1648.75−0.290.77−0.0763.752.980.020.67
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Mean of decoding accuracy and statistical analysis in each ROI for scene category

    ROIDecoding of scene category
    Temperature judgment taskSound-level judgment task
    Meant statisticsqEffect sizeMeant statisticsqEffect size
    PPA43.135.66< 0.0011.2742.505.98< 0.0011.34
    S125.630.210.740.0426.320.520.360.12
    A126.320.420.340.0923.13−0.680.750.09
    MFG33.752.330.010.3333.752.330.020.52
    SFG28.131.560.230.2034.382.880.010.64
    IFG31.252.030.040.4534.383.680.0020.82
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 41 (34)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 41, Issue 34
25 Aug 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neural Representations in the Prefrontal Cortex Are Task Dependent for Scene Attributes But Not for Scene Categories
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Neural Representations in the Prefrontal Cortex Are Task Dependent for Scene Attributes But Not for Scene Categories
Yaelan Jung, Dirk B. Walther
Journal of Neuroscience 25 August 2021, 41 (34) 7234-7245; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2816-20.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Neural Representations in the Prefrontal Cortex Are Task Dependent for Scene Attributes But Not for Scene Categories
Yaelan Jung, Dirk B. Walther
Journal of Neuroscience 25 August 2021, 41 (34) 7234-7245; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2816-20.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • fMRI
  • MVPA
  • PFC
  • PPA
  • scene categorization
  • task dependency

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Chemogenetic disruption of monkey perirhinal neurons projecting to rostromedial caudate impairs associative learning
  • Specializations in amygdalar and hippocampal innervation of the primate nucleus accumbens shell
  • The Inattentional Rhythm in Audition
Show more Research Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Electrophysiological Correlates of Lucid Dreaming: Sensor and Source Level Signatures
  • The Inattentional Rhythm in Audition
  • Similar Computational Hierarchies for Reading and Speech in the Occipital Cortex of Sighed and Blind: Converging Evidence from fMRI and Chronometric TMS
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.