Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Cellular/Molecular

G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) in the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla Is Essential for Mobilizing Descending Inhibition of Itch

Ting Gao, Li Dong, Jiahong Qian, Xiaowei Ding, Yi Zheng, Meimei Wu, Li Meng, Yingfu Jiao, Po Gao, Ping Luo, Guohua Zhang, Changhao Wu, Xueyin Shi and Weifang Rong
Journal of Neuroscience 15 September 2021, 41 (37) 7727-7741; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2592-20.2021
Ting Gao
1Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Dong
1Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiahong Qian
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
3Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaowei Ding
1Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Zheng
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meimei Wu
1Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Meng
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yingfu Jiao
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
3Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Po Gao
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
3Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Po Gao
Ping Luo
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guohua Zhang
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Changhao Wu
4School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xueyin Shi
1Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weifang Rong
1Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    RVM is engaged in chronic itch conditions, and nonselective inhibition of RVM neurons increases mechanical alloknesis. A–D, Representative IHC images showing the distribution of c-fos+ neurons in the RVM of female control mouse (A) and DCP-induced contact dermatitis mouse (B), female control rat (C) and contact dermatitis rat (D). Scale bar, 50 µm. E, The number of c-fos+ neurons in the RVM of control and contact dermatitis models; n = 6–7 slides from three animals for each group; One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to assess statistical differences. F = 32.84, p = 0.0002 for control mice versus DCP-treated mice, p < 0.0001 for control rats versus DCP-treated rats. F, Schematic showing the injection of AAV-hM4Di-mCherry into the RVM of female WT mouse. G, A representative image showing the expression of hM4Di-mCherry in the RVM section (4 weeks after virus injection). Scale bar, 50 µm. H, Chemogenetic nonselective inhibition of RVM neurons by injecting CNO (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) increased mechanical alloknesis; n = 6 mice for each group; Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. F (1,70) =51.25, 0.08 g: p < 0.0001, 0.1 g: p = 0.0027. I, Inhibition of RVM neurons (CNO, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) increased the withdrawal latency in tail flick test; n = 6 mice for each group; unpaired Student's t test, p = 0.0298, t = 2.531, df = 10. J, Mechanical itch test following saline or CNO injection in female WT mice preinjected with AAV-hSyn-mCherry; n = 5 mice for each group; Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. F(1,56) = 0.2936. 0.013 g, 0.04 g, 0.08 g, 0.1 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, and 0.8 g: p > 0.9999 for WT::mCherry+Saline versus WT::mCherry+CNO. NS, Not significant.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Nonserotonergic but GABAergic GPER+ neurons were significantly activated in DCP-induced chronic contact dermatitis rat and mouse models. A, Distinctive localization of GPER in RVM of female WT rat. Scale bar, 200 µm. B, High-power image of boxed area in A. Scale bar, 50 µm. C, Percentage of GABAergic and non-GABAergic GPER+ neurons in the RVM of WT rats. Nine slides from three rats. D, E, Double IHC of GPER (green) and 5-HT (red; D); GPER (green) and GAD67 (red; E) in the RVM of female naive rats. Scale bar, 20 µm. F, G, Double IHC showing the coexpression of GPER (green) and c-fos (red) in the RVM of contact dermatitis female rat (F) and mouse (G) models. Scale bar, 20 µm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Selective ablation of RVM GPER+ neurons aggravates acute and chronic itch. A, Schematic showing the injection of AAV-DIO-taCasp3 into the RVM of female WT or Gper-Cre mice. B, C, Western blot showing the decreased expression of GPER protein in the RVM of Gper-Cre mice 35 d after AAV-DIO-taCasp3 injection; n = 4 mice for each group; one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to assess statistical differences. F = 36.92, p = 0.0003 for WT::taCasp3 versus Gper-Cre::taCasp3, p < 0.0001 for WT versus Gper-Cre::taCasp3. D, Apoptotic neurons in the RVM were examined using TUNEL staining. Scale bar, 50 µm. E, The number of apoptotic neurons in the RVM of female WT or Gper-Cre mice injected with AAV-CAG-DIO-taCasp3-TEVp; n = 8–9 slides from three mice, unpaired Student's t test. p < 0.0001, t = 7.671, df = 15. F, Acute mechanical itch in GPER+ neuron-ablated Gper-Cre mice and control mice; n = 10–11 mice for each group; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. F(1,133) = 26.65; 0.08 g, p = 0.0299; 0.3 g, p = 0.0316. G, H, Ablation of RVM GPER+ neurons increased the scratching behavior in response to chloroquine (150 µg/20 µL; G) and histamine (500 µg/20 µL; H); n = 8–10 mice for each group; unpaired Student's t test. p < 0.0001, t = 5.855, df = 14 (G); p = 0.0215, t = 2.548, df = 16 (H). I, Ablation of RVM GPER+ neurons increased the scratch bouts induced by DCP on every testing day; n = 7–9 mice for each group. Difference in area under curve (AUC) was compared by unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0115, t = 2.908, df = 14. J, K, Representative photograph of neck skin in DCP-treated female WT (J) and Gper-Cre (K) mice injected with AAV-DIO-taCasp3.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Chemogenetic inhibition or activation of RVM GPER+ neurons differentially modulates itch-related behaviors. A, Schematic showing the injection of AAV-DIO-hM4Di-mCherry into the RVM of female Gper-Cre mice. B, Expression of hM4Di-mCherry in the RVM after viral infection. Scale bar, 50 µm. C, Acute mechanical itch test 30 min following saline or CNO injection (1 mg/kg, i.p.) in mice expressing hM4Di receptors in RVM GPER+ neurons; n = 12 mice for each group; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. F(1,154) = 99.52; 0.013 g, p < 0.0001; 0.04 g, p = 0.0001; 0.08 g, p < 0.0001; 0.1 g, p = 0.0356; 0.3 g, p = 0.0100. D, E, Effect of pharmacogenetic inhibition of GPER+ neurons in the RVM on scratching behavior induced by intradermal injection of chloroquine (150 µg/20 µL; D) and histamine (500 µg/20 µL; E); n = 10–12 mice for each group; unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0028, t = 3.382, df = 21 (D). p = 0.0021, t = 3.523, df = 20 (E). F, Time-dependent changes in scratching bouts of DCP-treated Gper-Cre mice after viral infection, CNO were injected intraperitoneally on days 5, 7, and 10 (gray frame), and the control group were injected with saline intraperitoneally; n = 5 mice for each group. Note CNO-treated group had higher scratching bouts than the saline group on the days of treatment (day 5, 7, and 10), although statistical significance was not reached (a: p = 0.1022, t = 0.1845 df = 8; b: p = 0.5456, t = 0.6310, df = 8; c: p = 0.2258, t = 1.312, df = 8). G, Schematic showing the injection of AAV-DIO-hM3Dq-eGFP into the RVM of female Gper-Cre mice. H, Expression of hM3Dq-eGFP in the RVM after viral infection. Scale bar, 50 µm. I, Acute mechanical itch test following saline or CNO injection in mice expressing hM3Dq receptors in RVM GPER+ neurons; n = 9 mice for each group; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. F(1,112) = 7.877; 0.013 g, 0.04 g, 0.08 g, 0.1 g, 0.2 g and 0.8 g, p > 0.9999; 0.3 g, p = 0.4622. J, K, Pharmacogenetic activation of RVM GPER+ neurons decreased scratching behavior induced by chloroquine (200 µg/20 µL; J) and histamine (600 µg/20 µL; K); n = 6–9 mice for each group; CNO (1 mg/kg, i.p.); unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0012, t = 4.062, df = 14 (J). p = 0.0005, t = 4.916, df = 11 (K). L, Pharmacogenetic activation of RVM GPER+ neurons attenuated spontaneous scratching behavior on day 15 of contact dermatitis mouse models; n = 4–5 mice for each group, unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0339, t = 2.630, df = 7. NS, Not significant.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    GPER deficiency results in hypersensitivity to itch in mice and rats. A, Western blot showing that GPER protein expression in the RVM was increased in female contact dermatitis rat models; n = 3 rats; unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0010, t = 8.586, df = 4. B, Scratching bouts of WT and GPER−/− rats in the normal physiological condition; n = 5–6 rats for each group; one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to assess statistical differences. F = 0.9604. p =0.9543 for WT female versus GPER−/− female; p = 0.4076 for WT male versus GPER−/− male. C, Acute mechanical itch test of female WT and GPER−/− rats; n = 12–15 rats; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. F(1,225) = 66.01; 0.2 g, p < 0.0001; 0.3 g, p = 0.0029; 0.6 g, p = 0.0003; 0.8 g, p = 0.0136. D–F, Scratching bouts of female WT and GPER−/− rats induced by intradermal injection of chloroquine (2.5 mg/50 µL; D), histamine (2.5 mg/50 µL; E), and 5-HT (200 µg/50 µL; F); n = 5–11 rats; unpaired Student's t test. Chloroquine, p = 0.0398, t = 2.266, df = 14; histamine, p = 0.0302, t = 2.487, df = 11; 5-HT, p = 0.0081, t = 2.938, df = 20. G, The number of scratching bouts of DCP-treated GPER−/− rats increased significantly on every testing day compared with WT rats; n = 6 rats for each group. Difference in area under curve (AUC) was compared by unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0014, t = 4.350, df = 10. H, GPER−/− rats treated with DCP for 7 d showed increased spontaneous scratching behavior on the eighth day (without DCP treatment) compared with WT rats treated with DCP for 7 d; n = 16–18 rats; unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0006, t = 3.789, df = 32. I, Photograph of the back neck of a WT rat (shaved) before DCP treatment (left), DCP-treated WT rat on day 15 (middle) and DCP-treated GPER−/− rat on day 15 (right). J, HE-stained skin before and after DCP treatment of WT and GPER−/− rats. Scale bar, 50 µm. K, The lesion severity score of neck skin in control rats, DCP-treated WT rats, and GPER−/− rats; 15 slides from three rats; one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to assess statistical differences. F = 53.14; p < 0.0001 for WT versus WT+DCP, WT+DCP versus GPER−/− +DCP and GPER−/− versus GPER−/− +DCP.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    GPER−/− rats show increased scratching behavior than WT rats in imiquimod-induced psoriasis models. A, The timeline for imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like rat model. B, C, Scratching behavior of female WT and GPER−/− rats on each day before (B) and after (C) painting with imiquimod cream; n = 5 rats for each group; area under curves (AUC) was compared by unpaired Student's t test. t = 2.149, df = 8 (B). p < 0.0001, t = 8.499, df = 8 (C). D, Photograph of the back neck of imiquimod-treated WT and GPER−/− rats on day 8. E, HE-stained neck skin of naive and imiquimod-treatment female WT and GPER−/− rats. Scale bar, 50 µm. F, The thickness of epidermis of neck skin in naive and imiquimod-treated female WT rats and female GPER−/− rats; 15 slides from three rats; one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to assess statistical differences. F = 99.64; p < 0.0001 for WT versus WT IMQ and GPER−/− versus GPER−/− IMQ. p = 0.0001 for WT IMQ versus GPER−/− IMQ. IMQ, imiquimod.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    GPER deficiency results in fewer activation of RVM neurons in contact dermatitis female rat models. Representative IHC images and graph showing c-fos+ neurons and serotonergic neurons in the RVM of naive and DCP-treated WT and GPER−/− rats. Scale bar, 100 µm. The scatter plots show number of c-fos+ neurons in 12 slides from three rats for naive groups and 23–24 slides from five rats for DCP-treated groups. Differences were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests. F = 15.10; p < 0.0001 for WT naive versus WT DCP, p = 0.0445 for WT DCP versus GPER−/− DCP, p = 0.0106 for GPER−/− naive versus GPER−/− DCP.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    GPER−/− mice are hypersensitive to chemical and mechanical itch. A, Scratch bouts of female WT and GPER−/− mice induced by intradermal injection of compound 48/80 (50 µg/20 µL); n = 4–5 mice for each group; unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0004, t = 6.308, df = 7. B, Systemic administration of G15 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly increased scratching bouts of WT female mice induced by compound 48/80; n = 4–5 mice; unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0005, t = 6.092, df = 7. C, Acute mechanical itch test of WT and GPER−/− female mice; n = 8 mice for each group; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. F(1,154) = 128.1; 0.013 g, p = 0.0232; 0.02 g, p = 0.0019; 0.025 g, 0.08 g, 0.1 g, and 0.2 g, p < 0.0001; 0.3 g, p = 0.0489. D, E, Scratching behavior of WT and GPER−/− mice on each day before (D) and after (E) painting with imiquimod cream; n = 4 mice for each group. Area under the curves (AUC) was compared using unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0613, t = 2.298, df = 6 (D). p = 0.0287, t = 2.863, df = 6 (E). F, Photograph of the back neck and HE-stained skin of imiquimod-treated WT and GPER−/− mice. Scale bar, 50 µm. G, The lesion severity score of neck skin in imiquimod-treated WT and GPER−/− mice; four slides from four mice; unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.5847, t = 0.5774, df = 6. H, Acute mechanical itch test of WT and GPER−/− male mice; n = 8 mice for each group; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. F(1,154) = 140.3; 0.013 g, 0.02 g, and 0.025 g, p < 0.0001; 0.04 g, p = 0.0007; 0.08 g, p = 0.0001; 0.1 g, p = 0.0185; 0.2 g, p = 0.0007. I, J, Scratch bouts of male WT and GPER−/− mice induced by intradermal injection of chloroquine (I; 150 µg/20 µL) and 5-HT (J; 10 µg/20 µL); n = 6–8 mice for each group; unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.1569, t = 1.531, df = 10 (I); p = 0.1843, t = 1.402, df = 13 (J).

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Male GPER−/− rats are hypersensitive to mechanical and chemical itch. A, Male GPER−/− rats responded to light mechanical probing of the back neck by hindpaw scratching more vigorously than their WT counterparts; n = 12 rats for each group; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. F(1,198) = 110.6; 0.2 g, 0.6 g, 0.8 g, and 2 g, p < 0.0001; 0.3 g, p = 0.0003; 4 g, p = 0.0066. B, Photograph of neck skin in DCP-treated male rats on day 8. C, HE-stained skin of naive and DCP-treated male WT and GPER−/− rats. Scale bar, 100 µm. D, Scratch bouts on every testing day of DCP-treated WT and GPER−/− male rats; n = 3–6 rats for each group; area under the curves (AUC) was compared using unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0070, t = 3.773, df = 7. E, Spontaneous scratching behavior on day 8 of WT and GPER−/− male rats; n = 3–6 rats, unpaired Student's t test. p = 0.0409, t = 2.501, df = 7.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    GPER modulates itch through regulating μ opioid signaling. A, Double IHC showing the coexpression of GPER (green) and MOR (red) in the RVM of WT rat. Scale bar, 50 µm. B, Double staining of GPER and Leu enkephalin in RVM of female rat. Scale bar, 10 µm. C–F, Western blot showing increased MOR phosphorylation in the contact dermatitis female WT rats but not female GPER−/− rats; n = 3 rats for each group; one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to assess statistical differences; p-MOR/MOR, F = 11.80, p = 0.0026 for WT versus WT+DCP; P-MOR/β-actin, F = 32.03, p = 0.0004 for WT versus WT+DCP; MOR/β-actin, F = 1.693.

  • Figure 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11.

    Hypersensitivity to itch in GPER−/− rats or mice was reversed by the μ opioid antagonist naltrexone. A, B, Systemic administration of naltrexone (1 mg/kg, s.c.) resulted in reduction of histamine-induced scratching (A) and scratching bouts under chronic itch conditions (B) of female GPER−/− rats; n = 5 or 6; paired Student's t test. p = 0.0435, t = 2.914, df = 4 (A); p = 0.0251, t = 3.161, df = 5 (B). C, D, Naltrexone (1 mg/kg, s.c.) reversed the hyper-responsiveness to light mechanical stimulation in female (C) and male (D) GPER−/− mice; n = 4 mice for each group; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. F(1,60) = 28.12, 0.04 g, p = 0.0248; 0.08 g, p = 0.0498; 0.1 g, p = 0.0498 (C). F(1,6) = 48.98, 0.04 g, p = 0.0002; 0.08 g, p = 0.0092; 0.1 g, p = 0.0008; 0.2 g, p < 0.0001; 0.3 g, p = 0.0092 (D). E, F, The mechanical itch response before and after the naltrexone (1 mg/kg, s.c.) treatment in naive WT male (E) and female (F) mice; n = 5 mice for male group and 6 mice for female group; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. E, F(1,72) = 0.4081; 0.005 g, 0.013 g, 0.02 g, 0.025 g, 0.04 g, 0.08 g, 0.1 g, 0.2 g, and 0.3 g, p > 0.9999. F, F(1,90) = 1.366; 0.005 g, 0.013 g, 0.02 g, 0.025 g, 0.08 g, 0.1 g, 0.2 g, and 0.3 g, p > 0.9999; 0.04 g, p = 0.1664. NS, not significant.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 41 (37)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 41, Issue 37
15 Sep 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) in the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla Is Essential for Mobilizing Descending Inhibition of Itch
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) in the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla Is Essential for Mobilizing Descending Inhibition of Itch
Ting Gao, Li Dong, Jiahong Qian, Xiaowei Ding, Yi Zheng, Meimei Wu, Li Meng, Yingfu Jiao, Po Gao, Ping Luo, Guohua Zhang, Changhao Wu, Xueyin Shi, Weifang Rong
Journal of Neuroscience 15 September 2021, 41 (37) 7727-7741; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2592-20.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) in the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla Is Essential for Mobilizing Descending Inhibition of Itch
Ting Gao, Li Dong, Jiahong Qian, Xiaowei Ding, Yi Zheng, Meimei Wu, Li Meng, Yingfu Jiao, Po Gao, Ping Luo, Guohua Zhang, Changhao Wu, Xueyin Shi, Weifang Rong
Journal of Neuroscience 15 September 2021, 41 (37) 7727-7741; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2592-20.2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • µ type opioid receptor
  • G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor
  • itch
  • rostral ventromedial medulla

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Lumateperone Normalizes Pathological Levels of Acute Inflammation through Important Pathways Known to Be Involved in Mood Regulation
  • Estrous Cycle Mediates Midbrain Neuron Excitability Altering Social Behavior upon Stress
  • Chronic Ethanol Exposure Modulates Periaqueductal Gray to Extended Amygdala Dopamine Circuit
Show more Research Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Indirect Effects of Halorhodopsin Activation: Potassium Redistribution, Nonspecific Inhibition, and Spreading Depolarization
  • Insufficient oligodendrocyte turnover in optic nerve contributes to age-related axon loss and visual deficits
  • mTORC2 Loss in Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells Results in Regional Hypomyelination in the Central Nervous System
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.