Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 24 February 2021, 41 (8) 1621; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.41.8.2021
Teresa Esch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Roles for Rab8a and Tuba in Neuronal Polarity

Pamela J. Urrutia, Felipe Bodaleo, Daniel A. Bórquez, Yuta Homma, Victoria Rozes-Salvador, et al.

(see pages 1636–1649)

Most cells have distinct subdomains with specialized functions. Epithelial cells, for example, have an apical domain, which typically faces a lumen, and a basolateral domain that faces other cells. Neurons exhibit an extreme form of such polarity, having a single axon specialized to transmit signals and a soma and dendrites specialized to integrate input. Notably, the same molecular processes drive the acquisition of polarity across cell types. These processes include modification of the cytoskeleton and accumulation of polarity-inducing proteins in specific domains.

The small Rho-family GTPase Cdc42, which activates a protein complex that modifies the cytoskeleton, is a key protein in the establishment of polarity in both neurons and epithelial cells. In epithelial cells, Cdc42 accumulation in the apical domain depends on vesicular transport regulated by the GTPase Rab8, as well as on anchoring and activation by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Tuba (Bryant et al., 2010, Nat Cell Biol 12:1035). Urrutia et al. now show that Rab8a and Tuba also contribute to axon specification, the first step in neuronal polarization.

In cultured hippocampal neurons, Tuba levels increased during axon specification, and Tuba became enriched in the nascent axon. Knocking down Tuba or mutating its GEF domain reduced axon formation and growth. A similar phenotype was induced by overexpressing a dominant-negative form of Rab8a. In contrast, overexpressing either full-length Tuba or constitutively active Rab8a increased the number of neurons bearing multiple axons. Notably, constitutively active Rab8a also led to an enrichment of Tuba in the distal axon and increased Cdc42 activity throughout neurons. Knocking out Tuba attenuated Cdc42 activation and suppressed the formation of multiple axons in neurons expressing constitutively active Rab8a. Importantly, knocking down Tuba or expressing dominant-negative Rab8a also suppressed polarization and reduced migration of newborn cortical neurons in vivo.

These data suggest that Rab8a contributes to neuronal polarization by promoting transport of Tuba to the distal axon, where it activates Cdc42. Downstream rearrangement of actin in the growth cone is expected to promote neurite elongation, which may lead to additional transport and accumulation of Tuba and Cdc42. Such positive feedback between neurite growth and directed vesicle transport is thought to be essential for neuronal polarization.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Compared with control neurons (left) those overexpressing full-length Tuba (top right) or constitutively active Rab8a (bottom right) are more likely to have multiple axons (green in top panels). See Urrutia et al. for details.

Brain Areas Linked to Consciousness of Surroundings

Annalotta Scheinin, Oskari Kantonen, Michael Alkire, Jaakko Långsjö, Roosa E. Kallionpää, et al.

(see pages 1769–1778)

Identifying the neural circuits responsible for generating consciousness is a fundamental objective in neuroscience. Studying the neural bases of consciousness is challenging, however, because it requires comparing brain activity in conscious and unconscious states, and demonstrating lack of consciousness is difficult. Failure to respond to probes is insufficient to indicate unconsciousness, because subjects may be conscious of a stimulus but unable to generate a response or may be in a so-called disconnected state, conscious of their own thoughts, yet unresponsive to external stimuli. Moreover, conditions in which people are unconscious, such as sleep or anesthesia, alter brain functions beyond those that are strictly necessary for consciousness.

To minimize these confounds, Scheinin et al. imaged brain activity in the same individuals under various levels of anesthesia and during multiple stages of sleep. Importantly, they not only assessed responsiveness before each scan, but also attempted to arouse individuals immediately afterward to ask whether they had any conscious experience during the scan. Notably, in >70% cases where unresponsive subjects were aroused, they reported having had some kind of experience, either related to the surroundings or disconnected from the world (e.g., dreams or memories). Comparing brain activity patterns in the same subjects across connected and disconnected states at similar anesthesia doses, the authors found that activity in the thalamus, cingulate cortex, and angular gyri was consistently associated with connected consciousness. In contrast, activity in frontoparietal cortex was suppressed under anesthesia regardless of conscious state. Activity in other cortical areas was inconsistent. Importantly, similar effects were seen with two different types of anesthesia, and the same areas were associated with consciousness during natural sleep.

These results suggest that activity in the thalamus, cingulate cortex, and angular gyri underlies connected conscious states, whereas reduction in frontoparietal activity, which is routinely linked to loss of consciousness, is likely an independent effect of anesthesia. Activity in other cortical areas probably contributes to the content of consciousness, that is, what is being experienced, but does not appear to be essential for creating a conscious state. Future work should compare brain activity when people report no conscious experience to activity when subjects report consciousness despite unresponsiveness.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 41 (8)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 41, Issue 8
24 Feb 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 24 February 2021, 41 (8) 1621; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.41.8.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 24 February 2021, 41 (8) 1621; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.41.8.2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Roles for Rab8a and Tuba in Neuronal Polarity
    • Brain Areas Linked to Consciousness of Surroundings
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.