Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Cover ArticleResearch Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Morpho-Electric Properties and Diversity of Oxytocin Neurons in Paraventricular Nucleus of Hypothalamus in Female and Male Mice

Saiyong Chen, Hao Xu, Shun Dong and Lei Xiao
Journal of Neuroscience 6 April 2022, 42 (14) 2885-2904; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2494-21.2022
Saiyong Chen
The State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, and the Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Saiyong Chen
Hao Xu
The State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, and the Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shun Dong
The State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, and the Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lei Xiao
The State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, and the Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Oxytocin (OXT) neurons in paraventricular nucleus of hypothalamus (PVN) are involved in modulating multiple functions, including social, maternal, feeding, and emotional related behaviors. PVN OXT neurons are canonically classified into magnocellular (Magno) and parvocellular (Parvo) subtypes. However, morpho-electric properties and the diversity of PVN OXT neurons are not well investigated. In this study, we profiled the morpho-electric properties of PVN OXT neurons by combining transgenic mice, electrophysiological recording, morphologic reconstruction, and unsupervised clustering analyses. Total 224 PVN OXT neurons from 23 mice were recorded and used for analyses in this study, and 29 morpho-electric parameters were measured. Magno and Parvo OXT neurons have prominent differences in their morpho-electric features, and PVN OXT neurons in male and female mice share similar neuronal properties. Some morpho-electric features of PVN OXT neurons, especially Magno neurons, exhibit significant diverse changes along the rostral–caudal axis. Furthermore, we find that PVN OXT neurons are classified into at least six subtypes based on their morpho-electric properties via unsupervised clustering. Only one Magno-Parvo mixed subtype in posterior PVN subregion, but not the other five subtypes, showed significant neuronal activity change in different feeding conditions. Our study supports the diversity of PVN OXT neurons and subtle neuron classification will promote excavating the functions of oxytocinergic system.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Oxytocin (OXT) is well known for its function in labor induction, but it also plays multiple roles in social, feeding, and emotional behaviors via modulating different brain regions. Paraventricular nucleus of hypothalamus (PVN) OXT neurons are traditionally classified into magnocellular and parvocellular. However, functional and single-cell transcriptomic studies indicate that OXT neurons should be further classified. Here, we thoroughly investigated the morpho-electric properties and spatial distribution of PVN OXT neurons, and find that OXT neurons have at least six subtypes based on their morpho-electric features. Among these six subtypes, only one magnocellular-parvocellular mixed subtype, which are distributed in the posterior PVN subregion, change their activities with different feeding states. Our study uncovers the diversity of PVN OXT neurons and suggests the necessary of subtle neuronal classification.

  • classification
  • feeding
  • morpho-electric properties
  • oxytocin
  • PVN

Introduction

Neuron is the basic unit of CNS. Mammalian brain comprises millions of neurons, which are categorized into diverse subtypes according to their morphologic, electrophysiological, and molecular properties. Neuronal diversity determines the functional complexity of the CNS. With the development of transgenic and molecular tools and techniques, more types of neurons in cortex and subcortical regions are gradually uncovered (Saunders et al., 2018; Gouwens et al., 2020). These studies have advanced our understanding about the refined brain structures and the elegant neural networks for controlling our motion, cognition, and emotion. Paraventricular nucleus of hypothalamus (PVN), which is a key center for neuroendocrine and autonomic regulation, consists of several neuropeptide releasing neurons, including oxytocin (OXT), vasopressin, corticotropin releasing hormone, and so on. PVN neurons have a broad projection in the brain, and are involved in a lot of innate and learned behaviors (Knobloch et al., 2012; Jirikowski, 2019). To better understand the functions and mechanisms, the diversity of PVN neurons should be further investigated (Althammer and Grinevich, 2017; Romanov et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2020).

Based on the projections and electrophysiological properties, PVN neurons are canonically divided into two subtypes: magnocellular (Magno) and parvocellular (Parvo) (Hoffman et al., 1991; Tasker and Dudek, 1991; Luther and Tasker, 2000; Stern, 2001). Magno, but not Parvo, neurons project to the posterior pituitary and release neurohormone into the blood. In electrophysiological properties, Magno neurons exhibit a pronounced transient outward rectification and the A-type potassium current, whereas Parvo neurons express T-type calcium current (Tasker and Dudek, 1991; Luther and Tasker, 2000). OXT neuron is one main class of PVN neurons. In addition to the well-known projection to posterior pituitary and releasing OXT into blood circulation, PVN OXT neurons also project to many brain regions to modulate prosocial, feeding, maternal, and emotion-related behaviors (Dolen et al., 2013; Marlin et al., 2015; Hung et al., 2017; Carcea et al., 2021). Several recent studies assessed the analgesic properties and behavioral role of Parvo OXT neurons in rats and mice (Eliava et al., 2016; Hasan et al., 2019; Lewis et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2020). Most studies about PVN OXT neurons follow the canonical principle to simply classify OXT neurons into Magno and Parvo subtypes (Xiao et al., 2017; Lewis et al., 2020). However, recent studies about both neural circuit function and single-cell RNA sequencing suggested that PVN OXT neurons have more than two subtypes (Althammer and Grinevich, 2017; Romanov et al., 2017).

Substantial studies suggested the anorexigenic effect of OXT in brain (Sabatier et al., 2013; Romano et al., 2020). OXT infusion into brain decreased food intake and increased energy expenditure to reduce body weight (Arletti et al., 1989; Deblon et al., 2011; Blevins et al., 2015). Food intake will increase the activity of PVN OXT neurons via activation of vagal afferents, which in turn promotes OXT release (Yamashita et al., 2013). However, the role of PVN OXT neurons in regulating feeding behavior remains controversial. Direct ablating PVN OXT neurons in adult mice had no effect on body weight, food intake, or energy expenditure on a regular diet (Wu et al., 2012; Xi et al., 2017). Activation of PVN OXT neurons alone in food-deprived mice had no significant effect on food intake (Atasoy et al., 2012; Sutton et al., 2014), but targeted ipsilateral activation of PVN OXT neurons suppresses the feeding behavior induced by activating agouti-related peptide neurons in arcuate nucleus (Atasoy et al., 2012). These studies disrupted or modulated the whole PVN OXTergic system. Some studies suggested that projection of PVN OXT neurons to nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) is responsible for leptin-induced body weight reduction (Perello and Raingo, 2013), and knockdown of NTS OXT receptors increased food intake (Ong et al., 2017). These results suggest that a specific subtype of PVN OXT neurons may be responsible for food intake regulation.

To dissect the diversity of PVN OXT neurons, we combined physiology, morphology, and clustering analyses. We first classified PVN OXT neurons into Magno and Parvo neurons, following the canonical principle, and thoroughly compared the differences between Magno and Parvo OXT neurons and along the rostral–caudal axis. With unsupervised clustering analyses, we find that PVN OXT neurons are classified into at least six subtypes based on their properties, and one subtype significantly changed their activities with different feeding conditions.

Materials and Methods

Mouse strains and genotyping

Animals were handled following the protocols approved by the Fudan University Animal Care and Use Committee. Unless otherwise stated, mice were housed on a 12:12 light-dark cycle (8:00 A.M. light ON and 8:00 P.M. light OFF) with ad libitum access to food and water. Nonbreeding male and female mice (postnatal 85-97 d) were used in this study. B6.129S-Oxt tm1.1(cre)Dolsn/J mice (Oxt-Cre, #024234, The Jackson Laboratory) were used to label OXT neurons. The floxed eYFP (Ai3) reporter strain was crossed with Oxt-Cre mice to visualize PVN OXT neurons. Mouse genotyping was conducted following standard procedures on The Jackson Laboratory websites.

Behavioral treatment

Before electrophysiology recording, mice were randomly pretreated in three different feeding conditions (Fig. 1): normal feeding (Normal), fasting (Fasting), refeeding after fasting (Refeeding). Mice were single housed in a new cage for 24 h with ad libitum access to food and water before feeding treatment. Then, mice were transferred into a new cage for different feeding treatments. For the Normal group, mice were housed with food and water for 25 h. For the Fasting group, mice were fasted for 25 h. For the Refeeding group, mice were provided with enough food and refed for 1 h after 24 h fasting, and mice were confirmed to consume the food during the refeeding time. Mice were killed for electrophysiological recording around the same time every day.

Acute slice preparation and electrophysiological recording

Acute brain sections were prepared from male and female Oxt-Cre: Ai3 mice (postnatal 85-97 d) as previously described (Xiao et al., 2017, 2018). Briefly, mice were deeply anesthetized by isoflurane, and then transcardially perfused with ice-cold, oxygenated (95% O2/5% CO2) ACSF (in mm) as follows: 127 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 25 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 25 glucose (osmolarity ∼310 mOsm/L). Brain was quickly removed and placed into a slicing chamber containing ice-cold ACSF, bubbled with 95% O2/5% CO2. Coronal slices (∼ 250 μm) were cut on a Vibratome 1000PLUS, and slices including PVN region were collected and incubated in oxygenated ACSF for ∼20 min at 34°C before recording.

For electrophysiological recording, a slice was transferred to a recording chamber with constant perfusion with oxygenated ACSF at a flow rate of 1.5-2 ml/min, with temperature maintained at ∼30°C during recording by a feedback inline heater (TC-324C; Warner Instruments). PVN OXT neurons were visualized in slices using an IR-DIC microscopy, and identified based on the eYFP signal. Current-clamp recordings were established with glass pipettes (3-5 mΩ) containing the following (in mm): 135 K-gluconate, 4 KCl, 10 HEPES, 10 Na-phosphocreatine, 4 MgATP, 0.4 Na2GTP, and 1 EGTA, pH 7.2-7.3 (osmolarity ∼295 mOsm/L); 0.5% (5 mg/ml) biocytin was added into the internal solution for morphologic detection after recording. PVN OXT neurons with 30-40 µm depth away from slice surface were recorded, and every neuron was recorded ∼10 min after break-in to ensure the biocytin filling. To minimize the severing of dendritic processes during the recording, glass pipettes approached the OXT neurons above the soma, but not laterally. Recordings were made using the 700B amplifier; data were digitized at 10 kHz and filtered at 4 kHz and collected using pCLAMP software (Molecular Devices).

Tissue processing, immunohistochemistry, and imaging

Mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and perfused transcardially with 4% PFA in 0.1 m PBS. Brains were postfixed for 24 h in 4% PFA at 4°C, and then sectioned at 50 μm on a vibratome (VT1200, Leica Microsystems). Tissues including PVN region were chosen and pretreated in 0.2% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature (RT), then blocked with 0.05% Triton X-100, 10% BSA in PBS for 1 h at RT and rinsed in PBS. Tissues were transferred into primary antibody solution (rabbit anti-OXT, 1:1000, T-4084, Peninsula Laboratories) in PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 and incubated for 24 h at 4°C. Tissues were rinsed in PBS for 3 times, and incubated with secondary antibody solution (goat anti-rabbit 647, 1:800, Invitrogen) in PBS for 2 h at RT, then rinsed with PBS for 3 times and mounted onto slides, dried, and covered under glycerol:TBS (3:1) with Hoechst 33342 (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sections were imaged with an Olympus VS120 slide scanning microscope. Confocal images were acquired with a Nikon A1 confocal laser scanning microscope with 25× objectives. Images were analyzed in ImageJ (Fiji).

Electrophysiological data analyses

Electrophysiological data would be collected when neurons had a persistent stable activity in 3 min after break-in. Three protocols were applied to record neuronal spontaneous activity, current injection induced firing, and response after relief from hyperpolarization, respectively (Fig. 1B,D). Electrophysiological data were analyzed following previous studies (Stern, 2001; Ekins et al., 2020; W. Zhang et al., 2021). For Protocol 1, spontaneous firings were observed in most of recorded neurons, excepting only three quiescent neurons (3 in 224 neurons). Neuronal activities recorded in this protocol were used to analyze neuronal spontaneous firing rate (sFreq), coefficient of variation (CV) of interspike interval (ISI), and all the spike properties. For phasic firing neurons (also called bursting), intraburst segment was selected for calculating CV and spike properties.

For analyzing spike properties, neuronal spikes were detected and aligned at spike peak time and averaged. The 100 ms data around spike peak of averaged spike were taken for phase plot analysis (membrane potential Vm vs dVm/dt). According to averaged spike and phase plot analysis, the following parameters were calculated: spike peak (Peak, the highest membrane potential), spike threshold (Thre, the membrane potential of the first time dVm/dt reaching 5 mV/ms), spike amplitude (Amp, the subtraction between spike peak and spike threshold), half-width (HW, the duration between membrane potential shoot over and drop below half amplitude), depolarizing rate max (DepoR, the maximum value of phase plot on y axis), repolarizing rate max (RepoR, the minimum value of phase plot on y axis), spike rise time (RisT, time between 10% and 90% of spike amplitude on depolarizing phase), decay time (DecT, time between 10% and 90% of spike amplitude on repolarizing phase), after-hyperpolarization (AHP) amplitude (AHPAmp, membrane potential difference between spike threshold and the lowest potential in the hyperpolarization phase), AHP latency (AHPLat, the time from spike threshold to the lowest potential of spike), depolarization after hyperpolarization (ADP) occurrence (ADPOcc, the probability of ADP occurred during spontaneous firing), and ADP amplitude (ADPAmp, the membrane potential difference between AHP trough and ADP peak).

For Protocol 2, currents were injected into neurons with 10 pA increments and 250 ms interval, and current injected in the first sweep was −100 pA. As neurons have spontaneous activity, averaged membrane potential in the steady state with −20 pA current injected was approximately considered as resting membrane potential (RMP, mV). Input resistance (Rin, mΩ) was determined according to averaged membrane potential in the steady state of −20 and −100 pA. The initial 30 ms voltage response with −100 pA current injection was fitted with a single exponential curve, and membrane time constant (Tau, ms) was obtained. Membrane capacitance (Capa, pF) was calculated by Capa = Tau/Rin.

For Protocol 3, neurons were first injected with a negative current (based on the results from Protocol 2) to make membrane potential hyperpolarize to −100 mV for 250 ms, and then redepolarized with a 250 ms current injection from −30 to 65 pA with 5 pA increments. The latency from hyperpolarization relief to the time of the earliest spike fired among all sweeps was defined as the spike latency (SpkL, ms). The first and second ISIs after relief from hyperpolarization were defined as interval1 (ISI1, ms) and interval2 (ISI2), respectively. Adaption index (AdpI) was defined as (ISI1-ISI2)/ISI1.

Morphologic data analyses

After electrophysiological recording, acute slices were fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C for at least 24 h, and subsequently were immunostained with AlexaFluor-488 streptavidin (1:800, 016-540-084, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) to visualize the morphology of recorded neurons. The confocal and VS120 images were used for morphology reconstruction and spatial location identification, respectively (Fig. 1B–D). Neuronal processes and soma were manually reconstructed using Neurolucida (MBF Bioscience), and morphologic features were extracted and analyzed by Neurolucida Explorer (MBF Bioscience). A total of seven morphologic parameters were measured (Sholl, 1953; Li et al., 2018; Ekins et al., 2020) (Fig. 1B,D), including soma area (SomaA, the area of cell body after projection along z axis), primary dendrite number (DenN, the number of dendrites originating from the cell body), node number (NodeN), dendritic ending number (EndN), total dendritic length (TDL), mean dendritic length (MDL, the average length of every primary dendrites), and process area (also called convex hull area, HullA, the area of convex hull of dendrites after z projection). Sholl analysis measured the intersections between a series of soma center circles with 10 μm radius increments and neuronal dendrites. The polar histogram was defined as the normalized dendritic length in every direction, and was used to analyze the distribution of dendrites in different directions.

To characterize the spatial location of recorded OXT neurons in PVN, serial 50-μm-thick slices of whole PVN from Oxt-Cre; Ai3 mouse strain were imaged with Olympus VS120 slide scanning microscope as the atlas of PVN OXT neurons. In combination with the confocal images, microscope images of biocytin-labeled neurons, the atlas of PVN OXT neurons, and the Paxinos adult mouse brain atlas, neurons recorded in this study were manually mapped onto six rostral–caudal parts of PVN (−0.58, −0.70, −0.82, −0.94, −1.06, and −1.22 mm away from bregma), and the distribution of OXT neurons in seven PVN subdivisions (PaAP, PaMM, PaV, PaLM, PaDC, PaMP, and PaPo) was determined according to the Paxinos adult mouse brain atlas.

Correlation and clustering analyses

The 29 morpho-electric parameters we calculated as described above were used for analyzing the correlations between different parameters and neuronal clustering. Neurons were excluded if any of morpho-electric parameters was lacked, and 203 of 224 neurons were included for correlation and clustering analyses. Pearson correlation coefficient between every two parameters were calculated. The Pearson correlation coefficient matrix was demonstrated by a heatmap, and significant level of correlation was indicated by circle size; level of significance <0.05 was reported.

All morpho-electric properties were z-scored to center data and eliminate the difference of scale before clustering. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was based on cosine distances and the average method. z-scored data were used to plot heatmap, and distance matrix was used to compute dendrogram in MATLAB (The MathWorks). A total of 203 of 224 neurons were included in the clustering analysis, and classified into three main types with the hierarchical clustering trees cutoff at the height of 0.9 (the largest cluster distance is 1.2). Each main type was further divided into two subtypes. The two-dimensional Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection plot based on the principal components of morpho-electric properties was used to visualize the distribution of different subtypes (Becht et al., 2019).

Quantification and statistical analysis

All electrophysiological data analyses were performed using MATLAB (The MathWorks), pClamp10 (Molecular Devices), or GraphPad Prism (GraphPad). Image analyses were conducted in Imaris (Oxford Instruments), Neurolucida Explorer (MBF Bioscience), and ImageJ (Fiji, National Institutes of Health). Whenever possible, data were analyzed blind to condition. The number of neurons recorded and the number of animals used in every experiment are provided in the figure legends. Group data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Normality was tested using D'Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test. For two-group comparisons, statistical significance was determined by two-tailed paired or unpaired Student's t tests, or Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test or Mann–Whitney test when assumptions for parametric testing were not satisfied. For multiple group comparisons, one-way ANOVA tests were used for normally distributed data, followed by post hoc analyses. For data that were not normally distributed, nonparametric tests for the appropriate group types were used instead. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Distinct electrophysiological properties between PVN Magno and Parvo OXT neurons

To specifically investigate the properties of PVN OXT neurons, our experiments were conducted with nonbreeding male and female Oxt-Cre; Ai3 transgenic mice (postnatal 85-97 d). The reliability and efficiency of Oxt-Cre; Ai3 mice were confirmed with OXT immunostaining (Fig. 1A), and we observed that >86% eYFP+ neurons were OXT-immunopositive (86.05%, 870 of 1011 eYFP+ neurons from 2 mice) and >89% OXT-immunopositive neurons were eYFP+ (89.51%, 870 of 972 OXT-immunopositive neurons from 2 mice) (Fig. 1A). With the eYFP signal to identify PVN OXT neurons, we conducted electrophysiological recording in current-clamp mode, and the physiological and morphologic properties of OXT neurons were measured after recording as described in Materials and Methods (Fig. 1B–D). We totally recorded 235 PVN OXT neurons, and 224 of 235 neurons from 23 mice have good electrophysiological properties and were included for the analyses in this study.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Experimental and data analyses procedures. (A) Left, Example images showing fluorescence expression in Oxt-Cre; Ai3 mouse (green), OXT immunostaining (red), and overlap between Ai3 signal and OXT IF. Right, Percentage of Ai3-positive neurons colocalized with OXT IF positive neurons. n = 1011 neurons from 2 mice. B, Experimental procedure. Mice were treated in three different feeding conditions (left), then PVN OXT neurons were recorded and labeled with biocytin (middle), and neuronal morphology and spatial location were imaged and reconstructed (right). C, The Paxinos brain reference atlas used to map the recorded PVN OXT neurons. D, Electrophysiological (top) and morphologic (bottom) properties extracted and analyzed in this study. ADP (%) indicates the probability of ADP occurrence. ①, ② indicate ISI1 and ISI2, respectively; D, dorsal; L, lateral to third ventricle.

OXT neurons are traditionally classified into Magno and Parvo subtypes based on the transient outward rectification and latency to spike following relief from hyperpolarization (Luther and Tasker, 2000; Eliava et al., 2016; Xiao et al., 2017; Lewis et al., 2020). We defined the minimum depolarizing rate of membrane potential before the first spike generation during depolarization as the rectified depolarizing rate. As shown in Figure 2A, B, PVN OXT neurons are clearly separated into Magno and Parvo subtypes with the rectified depolarizing rate cutoff at ∼0.4. In general, Magno neurons have a longer spike latency than Parvo neurons (Magno latency: 83.27 ± 2.58 ms, n = 156 neurons; Parvo latency: 23.63 ± 1.01 ms, n = 68 neurons. p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test. Fig. 2C), although a few Magno OXT neurons exhibit a short latency to spike (the proportion of neurons with spike latency <50 ms is 8.97%, Fig. 2B). The ratio of Magno OXT neurons and Parvo OXT neurons we recorded is 2.29:1, which is consistent with the previous study detected based on Fluoro-Gold tracing (Lewis et al., 2020). In addition to the spike latency, Magno and Parvo OXT neurons have different ISI patterns for spikes following relief from hyperpolarization as shown in Figure 2D. Compared with Magno neurons, Parvo OXT neurons have a larger ISI1 and adaptation index (Fig. 2D).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Physiologic properties of PVN OXT Magno and Parvo neurons. A, Representative traces from Magno (left) and Parvo (right) PVN OXT neurons. Top, Current injection protocols. Bottom, Neuronal responses. Blue dashed line indicates −100 mV membrane potential level. The duration between red dashed lines is the spike latency. B, Distribution of spike latency and minimum voltage depolarizing rate following relief from hyperpolarization of Magno (red) and Parvo OXT (green) neurons. Blue dashed line indicates the boundary between Magno and Parvo neurons. Insets, Example traces of a Parvo neuron (top) with a long spike latency and a Magno neuron (bottom) with a short spike latency. C, Left, Summary about the shortest latency to spike following relief from hyperpolarization for Magno and Parvo neurons. n = 156 Magno neurons, and n = 68 Parvo neurons. Right, Distribution of spike latency from all PVN OXT neurons and ksdensity fitting of the distribution. D, Summary data about the first ISI (Interval1 or ISI1, bottom left) and adaptation index (bottom right) of repolarization-induced spikes. E, Example traces of irregular firing, regular firing, and phasic firing. F, Summary about the CV of spontaneous activity in Magno and Parvo neurons. G–K, Same as in F, but for spontaneous firing rate (G), resting membrane potential (H), membrane time constant (I), input resistance (J), and membrane capacitance (K). L, Spike number change with different current injections. M, Examples of averaged action potential (left) and voltage change phase (right) of Magno (top) and Parvo (bottom) neurons. Bottom left, Inset, A prominent ADP. N, Summary about spike threshold in Magno and Parvo neurons. O–V, Same as in N, but for spike amplitude (O), spike peak (P), rise time and decay time (Q), depolarizing rate maximum (R), repolarizing rate maximum (S), spike half-width (T), AHP amplitude and latency (U), and ADP amplitude and occurrence probability (V). n = 151-158 Magno neurons and n = 67-68 Parvo neurons for each electrophysiological parameter. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; Mann–Whitney test. Horizontal lines in violin plot indicate quartiles and median.

Both spontaneous activity and different current injection-induced activity were recorded and analyzed as shown in Figure 1D. PVN OXT neurons we recorded exhibited four types of spontaneous activity according to CV (Fig. 2E): regular firing, with CV no more than 0.5 (73.66%, 165 in 224 neurons); irregular firing, with CV >0.5 (22.32%, 50 in 224 neurons); phasic firing, with bursting observed during firing (2.68%, 6 in 224 neurons); and another three quiescent neurons. The CV in Magno neurons is significantly larger than that in Parvo neurons (Fig. 2F), which is consistent with more Magno neurons exhibiting irregular firing mode (26.92% for Magno neurons, 42 in 156 neurons; 11.76% for Parvo neurons, 8 in 68 neurons). Although spontaneous firing rate, resting membrane potential, and membrane time constant are similar between Magno and Parvo neurons (Fig. 2G–I), Magno OXT neurons have a higher input resistance and a lower membrane capacitance than Parvo neurons (Fig. 2J,K). In line with the higher input resistance, positive current injection induced more action potentials in Magno OXT neurons than Parvo neurons (Fig. 2L).

Since the expression levels of potassium and calcium-related channels in Magno and Parvo neurons are different (Lewis et al., 2020), and voltage-gated ion channel expressions determine action potential properties, we analyzed the differences of spike properties between Magno and Parvo neurons. Only neurons with spontaneous firing activity were included for analyzing spike properties, and 12 spike-related parameters were calculated (Fig. 2M; see Materials and Methods). Spike threshold is similar between Magno neurons and Parvo OXT neurons (Fig. 2N), but Parvo neurons have a significantly larger spike amplitude than Magno neurons (Fig. 2O). Although spike rise time and spike peak values do not show significant distinctions between Magno and Parvo neurons, the Magno neurons have a longer spike decay time (Fig. 2P,Q). Meanwhile, Magno neurons have smaller maximum depolarizing rate and repolarizing rate (Fig. 2R,S), which are consistent with a larger spike half-width observed in Magno neurons (Fig. 2T). AHP occurs because some delayed rectifiers are still open and the membrane is therefore more permeable to potassium. For PVN OXT neurons, Magno subtype has a larger AHP than Parvo neurons (Fig. 2U). An after-depolarization (ADP) after the termination of a single spike, which is related to the T-type calcium channel (Jung et al., 2001; Deleuze et al., 2012), was observed in some OXT neurons (Fig. 2M). Parvo neurons have a higher probability to generate an ADP following an action potential, but the amplitude of ADP in Magno and Parvo neurons is not significantly different (Fig. 2V).

Parvo OXT neurons have more complicated morphology than Magno neurons

Since biocytin was loaded into OXT neurons during electrophysiological recording, morphology properties of PVN OXT neurons were analyzed. Only the neurons with good break-in and electrophysiological properties were considered for morphology analyses. Neuronal morphologies were reconstructed in Neurolucida based on a digitized image stack after staining and imaging, and seven morphology properties, Sholl analysis, and polar histogram were measured with Neurolucida explorer as shown in Figure 1 (see Materials and Methods). A total of 213 of 224 neurons from 23 mice (156 Magno neurons and 57 Parvo neurons) were included in the morphology analyses, and 11 of 224 neuronal morphologies were destroyed or not found after electrophysiological recording. Reconstructed morphology and spatial distribution of OXT neurons we recorded are shown in Figure 3A.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Morphologic properties of PVN OXT Magno and Parvo neurons. A, The reconstructed morphologies and spatial distribution of 156 Magno (red) and 57 Parvo (green) neurons in different PVN subregions. D, Dorsal; L, lateral to third ventricle. Left number, distance to bregma (mm). B, Soma area of Magno and Parvo OXT neurons. C–H, Same as in B, but for primary dendrite number (C), total dendritic length (D), mean dendritic length (E), branch nodes number (F), branch ending number (G), and process area (H). I, A Sholl analysis example. J, K, Sholl analysis of Magno and Parvo neurons about total number of Sholl intersections (J) and dendritic length per 10 μm (K). n = 156 Magno neurons, and 57 Parvo neurons. ****p < 0.0001 (Mann–Whitney test). Horizontal lines in violin plot indicate quartiles and median.

Although previous studies suggested that Magno OXT neurons in rats have larger soma than Parvo OXT neurons (Eliava et al., 2016), we did not observe significant difference in soma area between these two types of neurons (Fig. 3B). However, we found that Parvo OXT neurons have more primary dendrites (Fig. 3C), longer total and mean dendritic length (Fig. 3D,E), more dendritic nodes (Fig. 3F), more dendritic endings (Fig. 3G), and more process area (Fig. 3H) than Magno neurons. Consistently, in the Sholl analysis (Fig. 3I), more intersections and longer dendritic length per 10 μm window from soma were observed in Parvo neurons (Fig. 3J,K). Together, these results indicate that, compared with Magno neurons, the morphology of Parvo OXT neurons is more complex.

As both male and female mice were used in this study, we separately investigated the gender difference of electrophysiological and morphologic features of PVN Magno (Table 1) and Parvo (Table 2) OXT neurons. For both Magno and Parvo OXT neurons, no significant differences were observed between male and female in most of features, except that dendritic branch node was more observed in male Magno neurons (Table 1) and male Parvo OXT neurons have significantly larger input resistance (Table 2). Meanwhile, the relative proportion of Parvo and Magno OXT neurons we randomly recorded in this study is higher in males (1:1.97) than in females (1:2.64). Therefore, although PVN Magno and Parvo OXT neurons exhibit sex difference in sporadic morpho-electrical properties, most features of PVN OXT neurons are largely similar between male and female mice.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Physiologic and morphologic properties of PVN magno OXT neurons are largely similar in male and female mice

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Physiologic and morphologic properties of PVN parvo OXT neurons are largely similar in male and female mice

Morpho-electric properties are correlated in Magno and Parvo neurons

As shown in Figures 2 and 3, we totally analyzed 29 morpho-electric features of PVN OXT neurons. We further investigated whether different neuronal properties are correlated, especially between morphologic and physiological properties. The paired correlations between morpho-electric features in Magno and Parvo OXT neurons were separately calculated, and the results are shown in Figure 4A.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Correlation between morpho-electric properties in PVN OXT Magno and Parvo neurons. A, Correlation index (labeled by colormap) and significant level (labeled by circle size) between every pair of morpho-electric properties in Magno (bottom left) and Parvo neurons (top right). B, Scatter plot of spike half-width and spike decay time from every Magno (red circles) and Parvo (green circles) neurons. The relation between half-width (HW) and decay time (DecT) was linearly fitted for Magno (red line) and Parvo (green line) neurons, separately. C-K, Same as in B, but for the relation between spike amplitude (Amp) and repolarizing rate maximum (RepoR) (C), total dendritic length (TDL) and convex hull of 2D process area (HullA) (D), mean dendritic length (MDL) and dendritic node number (NodeN) (E), TDL and repolarizing rate maximum (RepoR) (F), TDL and membrane capacitance (Capa) (G), spike threshold (Thre) and DecT (H), sFreq and spike rise time (RisT) (I), input resistance (Rin) and membrane time constant (Tau) (J), and MDL and DecT (K). n = 146 Magno neurons, and n = 57 Parvo neurons. Pearson's coefficient correlation two-sided. Terms: half-width (HW), decay time (DecT), repolarizing rate maximum (RepoR), rise time (RisT), AHP latency (AHPLat), spike threshold (Thre), input resistance (Rin), resting membrane potential (RMP), sFreq, adaption index (AdpI), spike latency (SpkL), depolarizing rate maximum (DepoR), spike amplitude (Amp), spike peak (Peak), AHP amplitude (AHPAmp), membrane time constant (Tau), ADP occurrence (ADPOcc), membrane capacitance (Capa), interval1 (ISI1), ADP amplitude (ADPAmp), coefficient of variation (CV), bursting (Burst), soma area (SomaA), total dendritic length (TDL), process area (HullA), mean dendritic length (MDL), ending number (EndN), node number (NodeN), and primary dendrite number (DenN).

Similar correlation patterns were exhibited in the Magno and Parvo subtypes (Fig. 4A). Strong positive or negative correlations were observed within physiological properties or morphologic properties, including spike half-width versus spike decay time (Fig. 4B), spike amplitude versus spike maximum repolarization rate (Fig. 4C), total dendritic length versus process area (Fig. 4D), and mean dendritic length versus dendritic node number (Fig. 4E). In addition, significant correlation was also observed between some physiological properties and morphologic properties, such as total dendritic length versus repolarization rate maximum (Fig. 4F) and total dendritic length versus membrane capacitance (Fig. 4G).

Meanwhile, although most morpho-electric features exhibited similar correlations in Magno and Parvo neurons (Fig. 4A), significant correlations between some properties were only observed in either Magno neurons or Parvo neurons. For example, correlations between spike threshold and spike decay time (Fig. 4H), spontaneous firing rate and spike rise time (Fig. 4I), are only significant in Parvo OXT neurons. However, the correlations between input resistance and membrane time constant (Fig. 4J), mean dendritic length and decay time (Fig. 4K), are only significant in Magno OXT neurons.

Change of PVN OXT neuronal properties along the rostral–caudal axis

As the mapping results shown in Figure 3A, morphologies of OXT neurons tend to become more complex along the rostral–caudal axis, so we further investigated the properties of OXT neurons in the rostral–caudal axis. We divided PVN into six rostral–caudal parts according to the mouse brain atlas (Fig. 3A). Consistent with previous study (Lewis et al., 2020), more Magno neurons we recorded are distributed in the PVN rostral division, while most Parvo neurons are localized in the PVN caudal division (Fig. 5A), but the soma size of PVN OXT neurons does not show significant change along the rostral–caudal axis (Fig. 5B). Morphologic properties, including primary dendrite number (Fig. 5C), dendritic endings (Fig. 5D), branch nodes (Fig. 5E), total and mean dendritic length (Fig. 5F,G), and process area (Fig. 5H), are monotonically increased along the rostral–caudal axis, which confirm the morphology of PVN OXT neurons becomes more complex. Since PVN is adjacent to the third ventricle, we analyzed the polarization of OXT neurons. As shown in Figure 5I, dendrite distributions in PVN OXT neurons are asymmetric, and most of dendrites radiate toward or along the third ventricle, consistent with previous observation in PVN neurons (van den Pol, 1982). Meanwhile, the neuronal dendrite covering region is becoming narrower along the rostral–caudal axis (Fig. 5I), which suggests that OXT neuronal dendrites are mostly constrained in the PVN region.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

The morphologic properties change in PVN OXT neurons along the rostral–caudal axis. A, Proportion of Magno and Parvo OXT neurons at each bregma level we recorded along the rostral–caudal axis. Different colors below from left to right represent −0.58, −0.70, −0.82, −0.94, −1.06, and −1.22 mm away from bregma. B–H, Same as in A, but for soma size (B), primary dendrite number (C), dendritic endings (D), branch nodes (E), total and mean dendritic length (F,G), and process area (H) change along the rostral–caudal axis. n = 213 neurons. Kruskal–Wallis test. I, Polar histograms of the OXT neurons recorded in different rostral–caudal parts of PVN. Left figures, Polarization summary in different PVN parts. D, Dorsal; L, lateral. n = 213 neurons.

The changes of physiological properties along the rostral–caudal axis were also analyzed (Fig. 6). The latency of the first spike following relief from hyperpolarization becomes shorter along the rostral–caudal axis (Fig. 6A), which is consistent with the biased distribution of Magno and Parvo neurons (Fig. 5A). The Interval1 (Fig. 6B) and adaptation index (Fig. 6C) for spikes following relief from hyperpolarization are monotonically increased along the rostral–caudal axis. The spontaneous activity and input resistance are significantly reduced along the rostral–caudal axis (Fig. 6D,E), and membrane capacitance has a reverse change (Fig. 6F), but the CV, resting membrane potential, and membrane time constant do not show monotonical change (Fig. 6G–I). The changes of spike properties exhibit multiple change patterns along the rostral–caudal axis, including spike amplitude and ADP occurrence probability, are monotonically increased (Fig. 6J,K), AHP amplitude is monotonically decreased (Fig. 6L), and spike threshold, spike peak, spike rise time and decay time, spike half-width, maximum depolarizing and repolarizing rates, AHP latency, and ADP amplitude exhibit U-shape or inverted U-shape change (Fig. 6M–T). These results indicate that morphologic properties mainly exhibit monotonical change, similar as the biased distribution of Magno and Parvo neurons in the PVN, but the physiological properties of PVN OXT neurons exhibit various variations along the rostral–caudal axis.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

The physiological properties change in PVN OXT neurons along the rostral–caudal axis. A, Distribution spike latency of PVN OXT neurons along the rostral–caudal axis. Different colors below from left to right represent −0.58, −0.70, −0.82, −0.94, −1.06, and −1.22 mm away from bregma. B-T, Same as in A, but for the interval1 (B) and adaptation index (C) of repolarization-induced spikes, spontaneous firing rate (D), input resistance (E), membrane capacitance (F), CV (G), resting membrane potential (H), membrane time constant (I), spike amplitude (J), probability of ADP occurrence (K), AHP amplitude (L), spike threshold (M), spike peak (N), spike rise time and decay time (O), half-width (P), maximum spike depolarizing rate (Q) and spike repolarizing rate (R), spike AHP latency (S), and ADP amplitude (T). n = 204-213 neurons for each parameter. Kruskal–Wallis test. Error bars indicate SEM.

Since morpho-electric properties of PVN OXT neurons exhibit diverse spatial change patterns (Figs. 5 and 6) and Magno neurons are distributed across PVN subregions, we further investigated the changes of Magno neuronal properties across the rostral–caudal axis. We defined the three PVN parts close to bregma (−0.58, −0.70, −0.82 mm) as the rostral region, and the other three parts (−0.94, −1.06, −1.22 mm) as the caudal region. Only three Parvo neurons we identified are localized in the rostral region (Fig. 3A), so we did not compare the properties of Parvo neurons in rostral and caudal regions. Parvo, rostral Magno, and caudal Magno OXT neurons have similar soma sizes (Fig. 7A). However, the other morphologic features, including primary dendrite number, dendritic node number and ending number, total and mean dendritic length, and process area exhibit significantly different among Parvo OXT neurons, the rostral and caudal Magno neurons (Fig. 7B–G). Compared with the rostral Magno OXT neurons, morphologic properties of caudal Magno neurons are close to the properties of Parvo OXT neurons (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

OXT Magno neurons in PVN rostral and caudal regions exhibit distinguishing morphologic properties. A, Soma size between rostral Magno (red), caudal Magno (yellow), and Parvo (green) OXT neurons. Different colors below from left to right represent −0.58, −0.70, −0.82, −0.94, −1.06, and −1.22 mm away from bregma. The three PVN parts close to bregma (−0.58, −0.70, −0.82 mm) were defined as rostral region, and the other three parts (−0.94, −1.06, −1.22 mm) as caudal region. n = 89, 67, and 54 for each group. B–G, Same as in A, but for the primary dendrite number (B), ending number (C), node number (D), total dendritic length (E), mean dendritic length (F), and process area (G). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's multiple comparisons test. Error bars indicate SEM.

For physiological properties, several features of the caudal Magno neurons are close to the rostral Magno neurons, including spike latency (Fig. 8A), the Interval1 (Fig. 8B), and adaptation index (Fig. 8C) for spikes following relief from hyperpolarization, CV (Fig. 8G), spike decay time (Fig. 8O), spike half-width (Fig. 8P), and maximum repolarizing rate (Fig. 8R). On the contrary, some physiological properties of caudal Magno neurons are more identical to Parvo neurons, but not to the rostral Magno neurons, including spontaneous firing rate (Fig. 8D), input resistance (Fig. 8E), membrane capacitance (Fig. 8F), ADP occurrence (Fig. 8K), and maximum depolarizing rate (Fig. 8Q). At the same time, other physiological properties of caudal Magno neurons are similar to both Parvo and rostral Magno OXT neurons (Fig. 8), such as resting membrane potential (Fig. 8H), membrane time constant (Fig. 8I), spike amplitude (Fig. 8J), spike threshold (Fig. 8M), spike peak (Fig. 8N), AHP latency and amplitude (Fig. 8L,S), and ADP amplitude (Fig. 8T). Together, these results suggest that rostral and caudal Magno OXT neurons have commonality and individuality, so they should be classified into different subgroups.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

OXT Magno neurons in PVN rostral and caudal regions exhibit distinguishing physiological properties. A, Difference of spike latency between rostral Magno (red), caudal Magno (yellow), and Parvo (green) OXT neurons. Different colors below from left to right represent −0.58, −0.70, −0.82, −0.94, −1.06, and −1.22 mm away from bregma. The three PVN parts close to bregma (−0.58, −0.70, −0.82 mm) were defined as rostral region, and the other three parts (−0.94, −1.06, −1.22 mm) as caudal region. n = 85, 66, and 54 for Magno-rostral, Magno-caudal, and Parvo, respectively. B–T, Same as in A, but for the ISI1 (n = 85, 63, 53 for each group, B), adaption index (n = 83, 58, 50 for each group, C), spontaneous firing rate, (n = 85, 65, 54 for each group, D), input resistance (n = 85, 66, 54 for each group, E), membrane capacitance (n = 85, 66, 54 for each group, F), CV (n = 83, 64, 54 for each group, G), resting membrane potential (n = 85, 66, 54 for each group, H), membrane time constant (n = 85, 66, 54 for each group, I), spike amplitude (n = 83, 64, 54 for each group, J), ADP occurrence (n = 83, 65, 54 for each group, K), AHP latency (n = 83, 66, 53 for each group, L), spike threshold (n = 83, 64, 54 for each group, M), spike peak (n = 83, 64, 54 for each group, N), spike decay time (n = 82, 64, 54 for each group, O), spike half-width (n = 83, 64, 54 for each group, P), spike depolarizing and repolarizing maximum rates (n = 83, 64, 54 for each group, Q,R), AHP amplitude (n = 83, 66, 53 for each group, S), and ADP amplitude (n = 83, 65, 54 for each group, T). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's multiple comparisons test. Error bars indicate SEM.

PVN OXT neurons are classified into at least six subtypes based on morpho-electric properties

The diverse variations of morpho-electric properties along the rostral–caudal axis as shown in Figures 5–8 suggest that PVN OXT neurons can be classified into more than two types. Hence, total 29 morpho-electric features measured from 203 of 224 PVN neurons in 23 mice were z-scored to standardize the scale and used for the unsupervised classification (see Materials and Methods).

As shown in Figure 9A, B, PVN neurons were categorized into three major types (ME-1, ME-2, and ME-3), and each type was further classified into two subtypes as described in Materials and Methods. ME-1a, ME-1b, and ME-2b are mainly composed of Magno neurons (92.31% in 26 neurons for ME-1a, 97.44% in 39 neurons for ME-1b, 96.23% in 53 neurons for ME-2b); ME-2a and ME-3a are mainly composed of Parvo neurons (70.59% in 17 neurons for ME-2a, 75.00% in 12 neurons for ME-3a); and ME-3b include both Magno and Parvo neurons (55.36% in 56 neurons for ME-3b are Parvo) (Fig. 9A). As shown in Figure 9C, these six subtypes are differently distributed along the rostral–caudal PVN axis. Morphology and electrical response from example neurons in each subgroup are shown in Figure 9D–I. PVN OXT neurons in ME-1a and ME-1b have simple morphology and also similar spike properties, but the CV of spontaneous activity is higher in ME-1a than in ME-1b (Fig. 9A). OXT neurons in ME-2a and ME-2b subgroups share several common physiological properties differing from the other four subgroups, such as higher spontaneous frequency, higher membrane potential, and longer spike rise time and decay time (Fig. 9A). Neurons in ME-2a and ME-2b, respectively, belong to Parvo and Magno neurons, and they have different morphologic properties (Fig. 9A,F,G). ME-3a and ME-3b neurons have similar morphologic properties, but OXT neurons in ME-3b have larger spike amplitude, ADP amplitude, and AHP amplitude (Fig. 9A,H,I). The distribution of different subtypes in PVN subdivision is also investigated, and we observed that most of neurons in ME-3b (83.64%) are located at posterior part of PVN (PaPo); but the other five subtypes contain neurons from multiple PVN subdivisions (Fig. 9A).

Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.

Unsupervised classification of PVN OXT neurons based on their morpho-electric properties. A, Morpho-electric properties (indicated by labels at the bottom) collected from each neuron. Each property value was z-scored. Rows are sorted into clusters indicated by left marks. Right columns, The information about gender, behavior, Magno-Parvo type, mapping, and PVN subregions. B, Two-dimensional Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) plot based on the principal components of morpho-electric properties. C, Distributions of six subtypes PVN OXT neurons along the rostral–caudal axis (labeled with different colors at the bottom). D, Morphologic and physiological properties of one example neuron from ME-1a subgroup. E–I, Same as in D, but for the example neurons from ME-1b (E), ME-2a (F), ME-2b (G), ME-3a (H), and ME-3b (I) subgroups, respectively. D, Dorsal; L, lateral to third ventricle.

Firing activities of ME-3 OXT neurons are changed in different feeding conditions

OXT acts as an anorexigenic factor in controlling food intake, but the effect of PVN OXT neurons on feeding behavior remains controversial (Sabatier et al., 2013; Romano et al., 2020). We investigated the change of PVN OXT neuronal activity from mice in three feeding states: Normal feeding, 25 h Fasting, and Refeeding 1 h after 24 h fasting (Fig. 1B). Spontaneous activities did not significantly change in different feeding states when considering all the recorded PVN OXT neurons together (FR in Normal: 5.945 ± 0.4037 Hz from 74 neurons; FR in Fasting: 6.195 ± 0.4165 Hz from 68 neurons; FR in Refeeding: 6.994 ± 0.4344 Hz from 80 neurons; p = 0.1736, Kruskal–Wallis test). We also did not observe significant firing rate change in different feeding states if PVN OXT neurons were simply divided into Magno and Parvo neurons (Fig. 10A). However, after unsupervised clustering analysis (Fig. 9), the firing activities of ME-3 OXT neurons, but not ME-1 or ME-2 subgroups, were significantly changed in different feeding states (FR in Normal: 4.489 ± 0.4311 Hz from 28 neurons; FR in Fasting: 4.242 ± 0.5020 Hz from 22 neurons; FR in Refeeding: 5.966 ± 0.5645 Hz from 17 neurons; p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis test), especially the firing rate at refeeding condition was higher than that at fasting condition (Fig. 10B). Since neurons in ME-3 were further classified into ME-3a and ME-3b, only OXT neurons in ME-3b, but not ME-3a, exhibited firing rate change with different feeding conditions (Fig. 10C).

Figure 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 10.

Firing activities of PVN OXT neurons in different feeding states and the properties of ME-3b neurons. A, Firing rate of Magno and Parvo neurons in Normal, Fasting, and Refeeding conditions. n = 48, 44, and 62 neurons for Normal, Fasting, and Refeeding conditions, respectively, in the Magno group. n = 26, 24, and 18 neurons for Normal, Fasting, and Refeeding conditions, respectively, in the Parvo group. B, Firing rate of ME-1, ME-2, and ME-3 OXT neurons in Normal, Fasting, and Refeeding conditions. n = 17, 22, and 26 neurons for ME-1, n = 24, 17, and 29 neurons for ME-2, n = 28, 22, and 17 neurons for ME-3 in Normal, Fasting, and Refeeding conditions, respectively. C, Firing rate of ME-1a (n = 8, 8, and 10 neurons), ME-1b (n = 9, 14, and 16 neurons), ME-2a (n = 5, 6, and 6 neurons), ME-2b (n = 19, 11, and 23 neurons), ME-3a (n = 5, 3, and 4 neurons), and ME-3b (n = 23, 19, and 13 neurons) OXT neurons in Normal, Fasting, and Refeeding conditions, respectively. *p < 0.05 (Mann–Whitney test for Fasting and Refeeding condition). D, Top, Example slice of PaPo with neurons labeled by biocytin immunostaining. Bottom, Distribution of ME-3a, ME3b, and ME-2a neurons in the PaPo. E, Top, Venn diagram of ME-3, PaPo, and Parvo neurons. Bottom, Venn diagram of ME-3b, PaPo, and Parvo neurons. F, Total dendritic length of six subtypes of OXT neurons. Top lines indicate the significant level of difference between ME-3b with the other five subtypes. G–J, Same as in F, but for spike decay time (G), ADP occurrence (H), membrane capacitance (I), and soma area (J). n = 26, 39, 17, 53, 12, and 56 neurons for ME-1a, ME-1b, ME-2a, ME-2b, ME-3a, and ME-3b, respectively. Different colors labeled circles in ME-3b subgroup represent Magno (magenta) and Parvo (green) neurons. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis test. Error bars indicate SEM.

OXT neurons in ME-3 are distributed in the posterior PVN (Fig. 9C), especially in the PaPo subregion (∼79.10% ME-3 neurons in the PaPo; Figs. 9A, 10D,E), and most OXT neurons (80.30% in 66 PaPo OXT neurons) we recorded in the PaPo belong to the ME-3 group. ME-3 neurons can be subdivided into ME-3a and ME-3b (12 neurons for ME-3a, 56 neurons for ME-3b). ME-3b, the only subtype showing activity changing in different feeding conditions, is composed of both Magno and Parvo neurons (25 neurons for Magno, 31 neurons for Parvo) (Fig. 10D,E). We then further compared the morpho-electric properties of ME-3b neurons with other subtypes. ME-3b neurons have more complex morphology than the other five subtypes, including longer total dendritic length (Fig. 10F). ME-3b neurons also show differences in some electrophysiological properties, such as shorter spike decay time (Fig. 10G), higher probability of ADP occurrence (Fig. 10H), and larger membrane capacitance (Fig. 10I). Furthermore, soma size of ME-3b neurons is significantly larger than that of ME-2a and ME-3a, which both are mainly composed of Parvo neurons, while similar to that of ME-1a, ME-1b, and ME-2b, which are mainly composed of Magno neurons (Fig. 10J). Meanwhile, the soma size of Magno and Parvo OXT neurons in ME-3b is similar (Magno: 129.8 ± 7.33 μm2; Parvo: 135.9 ± 5.95 μm2; n = 31 and 25 for Magno and Parvo neurons, p = 0.3967, Mann–Whitney test), and some Parvo neurons have a large soma area (Fig. 10J). Therefore, OXT neurons in ME-3b are different from the other subtypes, and may be responsible for regulating food intake behavior.

Discussion

OXT is involved in multiple functions and plays pivotal roles in every stage of our life (Lee et al., 2009). Neural function and transcription studies have suggested the diversity of PVN OXT neurons, but the morpho-electric properties and diversity of PVN OXT neurons are not fully investigated. In this study, we systematically characterize PVN OXT neuronal morpho-electric properties and rostral–caudal location distributions, and find that PVN OXT neurons are classified into at least six subtypes according to their morpho-electric properties (Fig. 11). Neither the ensemble activity of PVN OXT neurons nor the activity of Magno and Parvo OXT neurons shows significant difference for mice pretreated in different feeding conditions, but a clustering subgroup with Magno-Parvo mixed neurons in PaPo exhibit significant firing rate change (Fig. 11). Therefore, PVN OXT neurons are diverse, and subtle classification of PVN OXT neurons will advance our investigation about the functions of oxytocinergic systems.

Figure 11.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 11.

Schematic depiction of the main findings in this study. The main findings include the gradient change of Magno and Parvo OXT neurons along the rostral–caudal axis (top), correlation of morpho-electric features (bottom left), and six subtypes of PVN OXT neurons identified by the unsupervised cluster analyses and the involvement of ME-3b subtype in feeding behavior (bottom right).

Similar as previous reports about PVN Parvo and Magno neurons (Luther and Tasker, 2000; Stern, 2001; Luther et al., 2002), PVN Parvo and Magno OXT neurons exhibit a lot of distinctions in both physiological and morphologic properties. Although PVN Magno neurons are traditionally suggested to have a larger soma than Parvo neurons, we did not observe obvious difference of soma size of PVN OXT Parvo and Magno neurons in mice. Three possibilities may cause this contradicting result. First, patch-clamp recording may disrupt or distort cell membrane and induce the biased estimation of soma size. During patch recording, neurons could shrink/collapse; and even subtle differences in cell volume could affect subsequent soma size assessment. Second, species differences may also contribute to this contradicting result. Species differences in PVN organization and OXTergic signal have been reported (Insel et al., 1997; Kádár et al., 2010). Previous studies about soma size of PVN Magno and Parvo neurons were conducted in rats (Sawchenko and Swanson, 1982; Hoffman et al., 1991; Eliava et al., 2016), but few studies directly investigated the soma size difference of these two types in mice. Third, after further clustering classification, we observed that Magno-dominated subgroups, including ME-1a, ME-1b, and ME-2b, have larger soma size than Parvo-dominated ME-2a and ME-3a subgroups, but Parvo OXT neurons in the ME-3b have similar cell body as the Magno neurons (Fig. 10); and this distinctive subgroup may also cause the contradicting result about soma size. Our study finds that PVN Parvo OXT neurons have more dendrites, and PVN Magno OXT neurons have a wider action potential, induced by the longer spike decay time but not spike rise time, which are consistent with the properties of PVN Parvo and Magno neurons (Stern, 2001; Luther et al., 2002; Lewis et al., 2020). The repolarization phase of action potential is mainly determined by the voltage-gated potassium channels, indicating that Magno and Parvo OXT neurons have distinct voltage-gated potassium channels expression (Luther and Tasker, 2000; Lewis et al., 2020). In rat PVN, Magno and Parvo OXT neurons are suggested to have similar input resistance (Luther and Tasker, 2000), but an electrophysiology study about rat PVN pre-autonomic neurons found that one type of PVN neurons with shorter dendritic length have a significantly higher input resistance (Stern, 2001). In this study, mouse PVN Magno OXT neurons have a larger input resistance, and they will fire more action potentials with positive current injection than Parvo OXT neurons. These indicate that PVN Magno OXT neurons may be easier to be excited to fire more spikes, which is necessary for OXT neurons to release OXT (Wakerley and Lincoln, 1973; Knobloch et al., 2012).

We analyzed the correlation between physiological and morphologic properties of PVN OXT neurons. In addition to strong correlation within physiological properties or morphologic properties, dendritic properties of OXT neurons are also correlated with spike properties and membrane resistance (Fig. 4), suggesting that the morphology of OXT neurons may influence neuronal physiological properties. Neurons integrate synaptic inputs via dendrites and dendritic properties play important roles in regulating neuronal firing patterns and neural excitability (van Elburg and van Ooyen, 2010; Zhu et al., 2016). In hippocampus, minor alterations of dendritic bifurcations of CA1 pyramidal neurons would have effects on the features of action potentials (Ferrante et al., 2013). Neuronal input resistance in PVN neurons was suggested to reflect the total neuronal surface area and membrane sensitivity (Stern, 2001), and PVN OXT neurons also obey this rule. Therefore, more complex dendritic features of Parvo OXT neurons may be one of the factors to induce distinct synaptic integration and spike properties from Magno OXT neurons.

In many brain regions, neuronal properties, including morphology, physiology, and molecular expression, are reported to show gradient change along the anatomic structure (Milior et al., 2016; Berns et al., 2018; Holley et al., 2018). We found that OXT neurons in PVN are also not homogeneous along the rostral–caudal axis. Similar as previously reported (Lewis et al., 2020), Magno OXT neurons are more distributed in the rostral PVN and Parvo OXT neurons are located at the caudal part. Until now, few studies reported the changes of morpho-electric properties of PVN neurons along the rostral–caudal axis. Our study found that morphologic and electrophysiological features of PVN OXT neurons have diverse change ways along the rostral–caudal axis, including some exhibiting monotonic increase or decrease, some showing U-shape or inverted U-shape change, and several properties displaying no change (Figs. 5 and 6). In addition to the morpho-electric properties, rostral and caudal PVN OXT neurons exhibit different neural circuit projections and functions; that is, rostral PVN OXT neurons project more to the forebrain to regulate social-related behavior and locomotion (B. Zhang et al., 2021), and caudal neurons have more projections to the hindbrain and brainstem to control feeding and nociception (Blevins et al., 2004; Eliava et al., 2016). Molecular expression is required to screen to understand the mechanisms underlying these diverse properties changes along the rostral–caudal axis.

The role of PVN OXT neurons in regulating food intake is controversial (Atasoy et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2012; Sabatier et al., 2013; Sutton et al., 2014). In this study, we directly recorded the spontaneous activity of PVN OXT neurons when mice were pretreated in different feeding conditions. Unexpectedly, we did not observe significant difference when considering PVN OXT neurons as a whole, or simply classified into Magno and Parvo neurons, but one subtype of PVN OXT neurons ME-3b, identified by the unsupervised clustering and mainly distributed in the PaPo subregion, is relevant with feeding behavior. The firing rate of ME-3b was increased after refeeding, indicating that more OXT is released to terminate feeding, which is consistent with the anorexic role of OXT (Onaka and Takayanagi, 2019). Modulating PVN OXT neurons alone did not significantly change the food intake behavior (Atasoy et al., 2012; Sutton et al., 2014), but OXT neurons in the posterior PVN (PaPo subregion) projecting to the NTS are suggested to regulate energy homeostasis (Uchoa et al., 2009; Ong et al., 2017). Previous tracing studies found that rat neurons in PaPo region project more to the brainstem and spinal cord (Swanson and Kuypers, 1980; Sawchenko and Swanson, 1982). Combining retrograde circuit tracing and chemogenetic/optogenetic tools may specifically target the NTS-projecting OXT neurons in the PaPo to investigate the function of ME-3b neurons in feeding behavior. Recent studies in rats showed that PVN Parvo OXT neurons project to both the Magno OXT neurons in the SON and neurons in the deep layers of the spinal cord to encode contextual fear memory and promote analgesia (Eliava et al., 2016; Hasan et al., 2019), and social touch information converges to Parvo OXT neurons and then Parvo OXT neurons communicate with Magno OXT neurons to support motivated social communication (Tang et al., 2020). Magno and Parvo OXT neurons in ME-3b may also coordinate with each other to regulate social and pain-related behaviors. Hence, it is necessary to redefine subtypes of PVN OXT neurons to sophisticatedly investigate the functions of OXTergic system (Althammer and Grinevich, 2017).

In this study, we investigated the diversity of OXT neurons only based on the morpho-electric properties but did not screen their gene expression. In recent years, several studies uncovered the diversity of OXT neurons by PVN single-cell RNA sequencing, and at least four subtypes of OXT neurons have been identified (Romanov et al., 2017); however, they did not have neuronal morpho-electric features and spatial information. In mouse cortex, morpho-electric features of GABAergic interneurons covary with the transcriptomic types, and classification based on morpho-electric features is largely consistent with transcriptomic types (Gouwens et al., 2020). In the previous study, only 37 Oxt-positive neurons were identified for transcriptomic classification, and the small sample size may limit the subtypes screening (Romanov et al., 2017). It will advance our understanding about OXTergic system when we conduct single-cell patch-seq (Lipovsek et al., 2021), similar as the research in cerebral cortex (Cadwell et al., 2016; Gouwens et al., 2020).

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 81970727 and 31900738; Shanghai Pujiang Program 19PJ1401800; Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project 2018SHZDZX01; ZJ Lab; and Shanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology. We thank Dr. Han Xu for Oxt-Cre mice; Dr. Miao He for Ai3 mice; and the members of the L.X. laboratory for valuable input.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Lei Xiao at leixiao{at}fudan.edu.cn

SfN exclusive license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Althammer F,
    2. Grinevich V
    (2017) Diversity of oxytocin neurons: beyond magno- and parvocellular cell types? J Neuroendocrinol 30:e12549. doi:10.1111/jne.12549
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Arletti R,
    2. Benelli A,
    3. Bertolini A
    (1989) Influence of oxytocin on feeding behavior in the rat. Peptides 10:89–93. doi:10.1016/0196-9781(89)90082-x pmid:2748428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Atasoy D,
    2. Betley JN,
    3. Su HH,
    4. Sternson SM
    (2012) Deconstruction of a neural circuit for hunger. Nature 488:172–177. doi:10.1038/nature11270 pmid:22801496
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Becht E,
    2. McInnes L,
    3. Healy J,
    4. Dutertre CA,
    5. Kwok IW,
    6. Ng LG,
    7. Ginhoux F,
    8. Newell EW
    (2019) Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat Biotechnol 37:38–47. doi:10.1038/nbt.4314
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Berns DS,
    2. DeNardo LA,
    3. Pederick DT,
    4. Luo L
    (2018) Teneurin-3 controls topographic circuit assembly in the hippocampus. Nature 554:328–333. doi:10.1038/nature25463 pmid:29414938
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Blevins JE,
    2. Schwartz MW,
    3. Baskin DG
    (2004) Evidence that paraventricular nucleus oxytocin neurons link hypothalamic leptin action to caudal brain stem nuclei controlling meal size. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 287:87–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Blevins JE,
    2. Graham JL,
    3. Morton GJ,
    4. Bales KL,
    5. Schwartz MW,
    6. Baskin DG,
    7. Havel PJ
    (2015) Chronic oxytocin administration inhibits food intake, increases energy expenditure, and produces weight loss in fructose-fed obese rhesus monkeys. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 308:R431–R438. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00441.2014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cadwell CR,
    2. Palasantza A,
    3. Jiang X,
    4. Berens P,
    5. Deng Q,
    6. Yilmaz M,
    7. Reimer J,
    8. Shen S,
    9. Bethge M,
    10. Tolias KF,
    11. Sandberg R,
    12. Tolias AS
    (2016) Electrophysiological, transcriptomic and morphologic profiling of single neurons using Patch-seq. Nat Biotechnol 34:199–203. doi:10.1038/nbt.3445 pmid:26689543
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Carcea I,
    2. Caraballo NL,
    3. Marlin BJ,
    4. Ooyama R,
    5. Riceberg JS,
    6. Mendoza Navarro JM,
    7. Opendak M,
    8. Diaz VE,
    9. Schuster L,
    10. Alvarado Torres MI,
    11. Lethin H,
    12. Ramos D,
    13. Minder J,
    14. Mendoza SL,
    15. Bair-Marshall CJ,
    16. Samadjopoulos GH,
    17. Hidema S,
    18. Falkner A,
    19. Lin D,
    20. Mar A, et al
    . (2021) Oxytocin neurons enable social transmission of maternal behaviour. Nature 596:553–557. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03814-7 pmid:34381215
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Deblon N,
    2. Veyrat-Durebex C,
    3. Bourgoin L,
    4. Caillon A,
    5. Bussier AL,
    6. Petrosino S,
    7. Piscitelli F,
    8. Legros JJ,
    9. Geenen V,
    10. Foti M,
    11. Wahli W,
    12. Di Marzo V,
    13. Rohner-Jeanrenaud F
    (2011) Mechanisms of the anti-obesity effects of oxytocin in diet-induced obese rats. PLoS One 6:e25565. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025565 pmid:21980491
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Deleuze C,
    2. David F,
    3. Béhuret S,
    4. Sadoc G,
    5. Shin HS,
    6. Uebele VN,
    7. Renger JJ,
    8. Lambert RC,
    9. Leresche N,
    10. Bal T
    (2012) T-type calcium channels consolidate tonic action potential output of thalamic neurons to neocortex. J Neurosci 32:12228–12236. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1362-12.2012 pmid:22933804
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Dolen G,
    2. Darvishzadeh A,
    3. Huang KW,
    4. Malenka RC
    (2013) Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin. Nature 501:179–184. doi:10.1038/nature12518 pmid:24025838
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ekins TG,
    2. Mahadevan V,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. D'Amour JA,
    5. Akgül G,
    6. Petros TJ,
    7. McBain CJ
    (2020) Emergence of non-canonical parvalbumin-containing interneurons in hippocampus of a murine model of type I lissencephaly. Elife 9:e62373. doi:10.7554/eLife.62373
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Eliava M,
    2. Melchior M,
    3. Knobloch-Bollmann HS,
    4. Wahis J,
    5. da Silva Gouveia M,
    6. Tang Y,
    7. Ciobanu AC,
    8. Triana Del Rio R,
    9. Roth LC,
    10. Althammer F,
    11. Chavant V,
    12. Goumon Y,
    13. Gruber T,
    14. Petit-Demoulière N,
    15. Busnelli M,
    16. Chini B,
    17. Tan LL,
    18. Mitre M,
    19. Froemke RC,
    20. Chao MV, et al
    . (2016) A new population of parvocellular oxytocin neurons controlling magnocellular neuron activity and inflammatory pain processing. Neuron 89:1291–1304. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.041 pmid:26948889
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Ferrante M,
    2. Migliore M,
    3. Ascoli GA
    (2013) Functional impact of dendritic branch-point morphology. J Neurosci 33:2156–2165. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3495-12.2013 pmid:23365251
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Gouwens NW,
    2. Sorensen SA,
    3. Baftizadeh F,
    4. Budzillo A,
    5. Lee BR,
    6. Jarsky T,
    7. Alfiler L,
    8. Baker K,
    9. Barkan E,
    10. Berry K,
    11. Bertagnolli D,
    12. Bickley K,
    13. Bomben J,
    14. Braun T,
    15. Brouner K,
    16. Casper T,
    17. Crichton K,
    18. Daigle TL,
    19. Dalley R,
    20. de Frates RA, et al
    . (2020) Integrated morphoelectric and transcriptomic classification of cortical GABAergic cells. Cell 183:935–953.e19. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.057 pmid:33186530
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Hasan MT,
    2. Althammer F,
    3. Silva da Gouveia M,
    4. Goyon S,
    5. Eliava M,
    6. Lefevre A,
    7. Kerspern D,
    8. Schimmer J,
    9. Raftogianni A,
    10. Wahis J,
    11. Knobloch-Bollmann HS,
    12. Tang Y,
    13. Liu X,
    14. Jain A,
    15. Chavant V,
    16. Goumon Y,
    17. Weislogel JM,
    18. Hurlemann R,
    19. Herpertz SC,
    20. Pitzer C, et al
    . (2019) A fear memory engram and its plasticity in the hypothalamic oxytocin system. Neuron 103:133–146.e8. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.029 pmid:31104950
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Hoffman NW,
    2. Tasker JG,
    3. Dudek FE
    (1991) Immunohistochemical differentiation of electrophysiologically defined neuronal populations in the region of the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. J Comp Neurol 307:405–416. doi:10.1002/cne.903070306 pmid:1856330
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Holley ZL,
    2. Bland KM,
    3. Casey ZO,
    4. Handwerk CJ,
    5. Vidal GS
    (2018) Cross-regional gradient of dendritic morphology in isochronically-sourced mouse supragranular pyramidal neurons. Front Neuroanat 12:103. doi:10.3389/fnana.2018.00103 pmid:30564104
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Hung LW,
    2. Neuner S,
    3. Polepalli JS,
    4. Beier KT,
    5. Wright M,
    6. Walsh JJ,
    7. Lewis EM,
    8. Luo L,
    9. Deisseroth K,
    10. Dölen G,
    11. Malenka RC
    (2017) Gating of social reward by oxytocin in the ventral tegmental area. Science 357:1406–1411. doi:10.1126/science.aan4994 pmid:28963257
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Insel TR,
    2. Young L,
    3. Wang Z
    (1997) Central oxytocin and reproductive behaviours. Rev Reprod 2:28–37. doi:10.1530/ror.0.0020028 pmid:9414463
    OpenUrlAbstract
  22. ↵
    1. Jirikowski GF
    (2019) Diversity of central oxytocinergic projections. Cell Tissue Res 375:41–48. doi:10.1007/s00441-018-2960-5 pmid:30498946
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Jung HY,
    2. Staff NP,
    3. Spruston N
    (2001) Action potential bursting in subicular pyramidal neurons is driven by a calcium tail current. J Neurosci 21:3312–3321. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-10-03312.2001 pmid:11331360
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Kádár A,
    2. Sánchez E,
    3. Wittmann G,
    4. Singru PS,
    5. Füzesi T,
    6. Marsili A,
    7. Larsen PR,
    8. Liposits Z,
    9. Lechan RM,
    10. Fekete C
    (2010) Distribution of hypophysiotropic thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-synthesizing neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus of the mouse. J Comp Neurol 518:3948–3961. doi:10.1002/cne.22432 pmid:20737594
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Knobloch HS,
    2. Charlet A,
    3. Hoffmann LC,
    4. Eliava M,
    5. Khrulev S,
    6. Cetin AH,
    7. Osten P,
    8. Schwarz MK,
    9. Seeburg PH,
    10. Stoop R,
    11. Grinevich V
    (2012) Evoked axonal oxytocin release in the central amygdala attenuates fear response. Neuron 73:553–566. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.030 pmid:22325206
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Lee HJ,
    2. Macbeth AH,
    3. Pagani JH,
    4. Young WS
    (2009) Oxytocin: the great facilitator of life. Prog Neurobiol 88:127–151. pmid:19482229
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Lewis EM,
    2. Stein-O'Brien GL,
    3. Patino AV,
    4. Nardou R,
    5. Grossman CD,
    6. Brown M,
    7. Bangamwabo B,
    8. Ndiaye N,
    9. Giovinazzo D,
    10. Dardani I,
    11. Jiang C,
    12. Goff LA,
    13. Dölen G
    (2020) Parallel social information processing circuits are differentially impacted in autism. Neuron 108:659–675. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.002 pmid:33113347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Missig G,
    3. Finger BC,
    4. Landino SM,
    5. Alexander AJ,
    6. Mokler EL,
    7. Robbins JO,
    8. Manasian Y,
    9. Kim W,
    10. Kim KS,
    11. McDougle CJ,
    12. Carlezon WA,
    13. Bolshakov VY
    (2018) Maternal and early postnatal immune activation produce dissociable effects on neurotransmission in mPFC–amygdala circuits. J Neurosci 38:3358–3372. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3642-17.2018 pmid:29491010
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Lipovsek M,
    2. Bardy C,
    3. Tripathy SJ,
    4. Cadwell CR,
    5. Hadley K,
    6. Kobak D
    (2021) Patch-seq: past, present, and future. J Neurosci 41:937–946. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1653-20.2020 pmid:33431632
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Luther JA,
    2. Daftary SS,
    3. Boudaba C,
    4. Gould GC,
    5. Halmos KC,
    6. Tasker JG
    (2002) Neurosecretory and non-neurosecretory parvocellular neurones of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus express distinct electrophysiological properties. J Neuroendocrinol 14:929–932. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2826.2002.00867.x pmid:12472873
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Luther JA,
    2. Tasker JG
    (2000) Voltage-gated currents distinguish parvocellular from magnocellular neurones in the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. J Physiol 523:193–209. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00193.x pmid:10673555
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Marlin BJ,
    2. Mitre M,
    3. D'amour JA,
    4. Chao MV,
    5. Froemke RC
    (2015) Oxytocin enables maternal behaviour by balancing cortical inhibition. Nature 520:499–504. doi:10.1038/nature14402 pmid:25874674
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Milior G,
    2. Castro MD,
    3. Sciarria LP,
    4. Garofalo S,
    5. Branchi I,
    6. Ragozzino D,
    7. Limatola C,
    8. Maggi L
    (2016) Electrophysiological properties of CA1 pyramidal neurons along the longitudinal axis of the mouse hippocampus. Sci Rep 6:38242. doi:10.1038/srep38242 pmid:27922053
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Onaka T,
    2. Takayanagi Y
    (2019) Role of oxytocin in the control of stress and food intake. J Neuroendocrinol 31:e12700. doi:10.1111/jne.12700 pmid:30786104
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Ong ZY,
    2. Bongiorno DM,
    3. Hernando MA,
    4. Grill HJ
    (2017) Effects of endogenous oxytocin receptor signaling in nucleus tractus solitarius on satiation-mediated feeding and thermogenic control in male rats. Endocrinology 158:2826–2836. doi:10.1210/en.2017-00200 pmid:28575174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Perello M,
    2. Raingo J
    (2013) Leptin activates oxytocin neurons of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in both control and diet-induced obese rodents. PLoS One 8:e59625. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059625 pmid:23527232
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Romano A,
    2. Friuli M,
    3. Cifani C,
    4. Gaetani S
    (2020) Oxytocin in the neural control of eating: at the crossroad between homeostatic and non-homeostatic signals. Neuropharmacology 171:108082. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108082 pmid:32259527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Romanov RA,
    2. Zeisel A,
    3. Bakker J,
    4. Girach F,
    5. Hellysaz A,
    6. Tomer R,
    7. Alpár A,
    8. Mulder J,
    9. Clotman F,
    10. Keimpema E,
    11. Hsueh B,
    12. Crow AK,
    13. Martens H,
    14. Schwindling C,
    15. Calvigioni D,
    16. Bains JS,
    17. Máté Z,
    18. Szabó G,
    19. Yanagawa Y,
    20. Zhang MD, et al
    . (2017) Molecular interrogation of hypothalamic organization reveals distinct dopamine neuronal subtypes. Nat Neurosci 20:176–188. doi:10.1038/nn.4462 pmid:27991900
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Sabatier N,
    2. Leng G,
    3. Menzies J
    (2013) Oxytocin, feeding, and satiety. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 4:35. doi:10.3389/fendo.2013.00035 pmid:23518828
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Saunders A,
    2. Macosko EZ,
    3. Wysoker A,
    4. Goldman M,
    5. Krienen FM,
    6. de Rivera H,
    7. Bien E,
    8. Baum M,
    9. Bortolin L,
    10. Wang S,
    11. Goeva A,
    12. Nemesh J,
    13. Kamitaki N,
    14. Brumbaugh S,
    15. Kulp D,
    16. McCarroll SA
    (2018) Molecular diversity and specializations among the cells of the adult mouse brain. Cell 174:1015–1030.e16. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.028 pmid:30096299
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Sawchenko PE,
    2. Swanson LW
    (1982) Immunohistochemical identification of neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus that project to the medulla or to the spinal cord in the rat. J Comp Neurol 205:260–272. doi:10.1002/cne.902050306 pmid:6122696
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Sholl DA
    (1953) Dendritic organization in the neurons of the visual and motor cortices of the cat. J Anat 87:387–406. pmid:13117757
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Stern JE
    (2001) Electrophysiological and morphological properties of pre-autonomic neurones in the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. J Physiol 537:161–177. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0161k.x pmid:11711570
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Sutton AK,
    2. Pei H,
    3. Burnett KH,
    4. Myers MG,
    5. Myers MG,
    6. Rhodes CJ,
    7. Olson DP
    (2014) Control of food intake and energy expenditure by Nos1 neurons of the paraventricular hypothalamus. J Neurosci 34:15306–15318. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0226-14.2014 pmid:25392498
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Swanson LW,
    2. Kuypers HG
    (1980) The paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus: cytoarchitectonic subdivisions and organization of projections to the pituitary, dorsal vagal complex, and spinal cord as demonstrated by retrograde fluorescence double-labeling methods. J Comp Neurol 194:555–570. doi:10.1002/cne.901940306 pmid:7451682
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Tang Y,
    2. Benusiglio D,
    3. Lefevre A,
    4. Hilfiger L,
    5. Althammer F,
    6. Bludau A,
    7. Hagiwara D,
    8. Baudon A,
    9. Darbon P,
    10. Schimmer J,
    11. Kirchner MK,
    12. Roy RK,
    13. Wang S,
    14. Eliava M,
    15. Wagner S,
    16. Oberhuber M,
    17. Conzelmann KK,
    18. Schwarz M,
    19. Stern JE,
    20. Leng G, et al
    . (2020) Social touch promotes interfemale communication via activation of parvocellular oxytocin neurons. Nat Neurosci 23:1125–1137. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0674-y pmid:32719563
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Tasker JG,
    2. Dudek FE
    (1991) Electrophysiological properties of neurones in the region of the paraventricular nucleus in slices of rat hypothalamus. J Physiol 434:271–293. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018469 pmid:2023120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Uchoa ET,
    2. Mendes da Silva LE,
    3. de Castro M,
    4. Antunes-Rodrigues J,
    5. Lucila LL
    (2009) Hypothalamic oxytocin neurons modulate hypophagic effect induced by adrenalectomy. Horm Behav 56:532–538. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.09.007 pmid:19778539
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. van den Pol AN
    (1982) The magnocellular and parvocellular paraventricular nucleus of rat: intrinsic organization. J Comp Neurol 206:317–345. doi:10.1002/cne.902060402 pmid:7096631
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. van Elburg RA,
    2. van Ooyen A
    (2010) Impact of dendritic size and dendritic topology on burst firing in pyramidal cells. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000781. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000781 pmid:20485556
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Wakerley JB,
    2. Lincoln DW
    (1973) The milk-ejection reflex of the rat: a 20- to 40-fold acceleration in the firing of paraventricular neurones during oxytocin release. J Endocrinol 57:477–493. doi:10.1677/joe.0.0570477 pmid:4577217
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Wu Z,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. Sutton AK,
    5. Zhao R,
    6. Lowell BB,
    7. Olson DP,
    8. Tong Q
    (2012) An obligate role of oxytocin neurons in diet induced energy expenditure. PLoS One 7:e45167. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045167 pmid:23028821
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Xi D,
    2. Long C,
    3. Lai M,
    4. Casella A,
    5. O'Lear L,
    6. Kublaoui B,
    7. Roizen JD
    (2017) Ablation of oxytocin neurons causes a deficit in cold stress response. J Endocr Soc 1:1041–1055. doi:10.1210/js.2017-00136 pmid:29264556
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Xiao L,
    2. Priest MF,
    3. Nasenbeny J,
    4. Lu T,
    5. Kozorovitskiy Y
    (2017) Biased oxytocinergic modulation of midbrain dopamine systems. Neuron 95:368–384.e5. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.003 pmid:28669546
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Xiao L,
    2. Priest MF,
    3. Kozorovitskiy Y
    (2018) Oxytocin functions as a spatiotemporal filter for excitatory synaptic inputs to VTA dopamine neurons. Elife 7:e33892. doi:10.7554/eLife.33892
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Xu S,
    2. Yang H,
    3. Menon V,
    4. Lemire AL,
    5. Wang L,
    6. Henry FE,
    7. Turaga SC,
    8. Sternson SM
    (2020) Behavioral state coding by molecularly defined paraventricular hypothalamic cell type ensembles. Science 370:eabb2494. doi:10.1126/science.abb2494
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Yamashita M,
    2. Takayanagi Y,
    3. Yoshida M,
    4. Nishimori K,
    5. Kusama M,
    6. Onaka T
    (2013) Involvement of prolactin-releasing peptide in the activation of oxytocin neurones in response to food intake. J Neuroendocrinol 25:455–465. doi:10.1111/jne.12019 pmid:23363338
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Zhang B,
    2. Qiu L,
    3. Xiao W,
    4. Ni H,
    5. Chen L,
    6. Wang F,
    7. Mai W,
    8. Wu J,
    9. Bao A,
    10. Hu H,
    11. Gong H,
    12. Duan S,
    13. Li A,
    14. Gao Z
    (2021) Reconstruction of the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system and functional dissection of magnocellular oxytocin neurons in the brain. Neuron 109:331–346.e7. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.032 pmid:33212012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Zhang W,
    2. Li SS,
    3. Han Y,
    4. Xu XH
    (2021) Sex differences in electrophysiological properties of mouse medial preoptic area neurons revealed by in vitro whole-cell recordings. Neurosci Bull 37:166–182. doi:10.1007/s12264-020-00565-9 pmid:32888180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Zhu G,
    2. Du L,
    3. Jin L,
    4. Offenhäusser A
    (2016) Effects of morphology constraint on electrophysiological properties of cortical neurons. Sci Rep 6:23086. doi:10.1038/srep23086 pmid:27052791
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 42 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 42, Issue 14
6 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Morpho-Electric Properties and Diversity of Oxytocin Neurons in Paraventricular Nucleus of Hypothalamus in Female and Male Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Morpho-Electric Properties and Diversity of Oxytocin Neurons in Paraventricular Nucleus of Hypothalamus in Female and Male Mice
Saiyong Chen, Hao Xu, Shun Dong, Lei Xiao
Journal of Neuroscience 6 April 2022, 42 (14) 2885-2904; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2494-21.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Morpho-Electric Properties and Diversity of Oxytocin Neurons in Paraventricular Nucleus of Hypothalamus in Female and Male Mice
Saiyong Chen, Hao Xu, Shun Dong, Lei Xiao
Journal of Neuroscience 6 April 2022, 42 (14) 2885-2904; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2494-21.2022
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • classification
  • feeding
  • morpho-electric properties
  • oxytocin
  • PVN

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • EEG correlates of active removal from working memory
  • Increased neuronal expression of the early endosomal adaptor APPL1 replicates Alzheimer’s Disease-related endosomal and synaptic dysfunction with cholinergic neurodegeneration.
  • Presynaptic mu opioid receptors suppress the functional connectivity of ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons with aversion-related brain regions
Show more Research Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • CXCL12 Engages Cortical Inhibitory Neurons to Enhance Dendritic Spine Plasticity and Structured Network Activity
  • Atypical Cadherin FAT2 Is Required for Synaptic Integrity and Motor Behaviors
  • Sex Differences in Histamine Regulation of Striatal Dopamine
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.