Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Cover ArticleResearch Articles, Systems/Circuits

Autonomic Nerve Fibers Aberrantly Reinnervate Denervated Facial Muscles and Alter Muscle Fiber Population

Vlad Tereshenko, Dominik C. Dotzauer, Matthias Luft, Joachim Ortmayr, Udo Maierhofer, Martin Schmoll, Christopher Festin, Genova Carrero Rojas, Johanna Klepetko, Gregor Laengle, Olga Politikou, Dario Farina, Roland Blumer, Konstantin D. Bergmeister and Oskar C. Aszmann
Journal of Neuroscience 2 November 2022, 42 (44) 8297-8307; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0670-22.2022
Vlad Tereshenko
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
3Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominik C. Dotzauer
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Luft
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthias Luft
Joachim Ortmayr
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Udo Maierhofer
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Udo Maierhofer
Martin Schmoll
4Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Festin
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Genova Carrero Rojas
5Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johanna Klepetko
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Johanna Klepetko
Gregor Laengle
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olga Politikou
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dario Farina
6Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dario Farina
Roland Blumer
4Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konstantin D. Bergmeister
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2Centers for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
7Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital, A-3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oskar C. Aszmann
1Clinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
8Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The surgical redirection of efferent neural input to a denervated muscle via a nerve transfer can reestablish neuromuscular control after nerve injuries. The role of autonomic nerve fibers during the process of muscular reinnervation remains largely unknown. Here, we investigated the neurobiological mechanisms behind the spontaneous functional recovery of denervated facial muscles in male rodents. Recovered facial muscles demonstrated an abundance of cholinergic axonal endings establishing functional neuromuscular junctions. The parasympathetic source of the neuronal input was confirmed to be in the pterygopalatine ganglion. Furthermore, the autonomically reinnervated facial muscles underwent a muscle fiber change to a purely intermediate muscle fiber population myosin heavy chain type IIa. Finally, electrophysiological tests revealed that the postganglionic parasympathetic fibers travel to the facial muscles via the sensory infraorbital nerve. Our findings demonstrated expanded neuromuscular plasticity of denervated striated muscles enabling functional recovery via alien autonomic fibers. These findings may further explain the underlying mechanisms of sensory protection implemented to prevent atrophy of a denervated muscle.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Nerve injuries represent significant morbidity and disability for patients. Rewiring motor nerve fibers to other target muscles has shown to be a successful approach in the restoration of motor function. This demonstrates the remarkable capacity of the CNS to adapt to the needs of the neuromuscular system. Yet, the capability of skeletal muscles being reinnervated by nonmotor axons remains largely unknown. Here, we show that under deprivation of original efferent input, the neuromuscular system can undergo functional and morphologic remodeling via autonomic nerve fibers. This may explain neurobiological mechanisms of the sensory protection phenomenon, which is because of parasympathetic reinnervation.

  • autonomic nervous system
  • facial muscles
  • facial nerve
  • muscle fiber types
  • parasympathetic reinnervation
  • sensory protection

Introduction

The locomotor system is essential to move the body, maintain posture, and perform various highly specialized motor tasks (Gatesy and Middleton, 1997; Filimon, 2010). Loss of the motor function can occur because of lesions of upper or lower motor neurons or peripheral neuropathic disorders of different etiologies. These nerve lesions, wherever they manifest, have a substantial negative impact on the quality of a patient's life (Schwartzman et al., 2001; Bergmeister et al., 2020). Untreated motor nerve lesions lead to functional deficits, which often must be surgically treated to restore muscle function.

Despite well-established therapeutic concepts for peripheral nerve injuries (Mackinnon and Novak, 1999; Lee and Wolfe, 2000), many clinical scenarios do not allow a primary nerve repair (Grinsell and Keating, 2014). The slow rate of nerve regeneration, limited resources of donor nerves, and especially the lack of trophic support in long nerve grafts compromise the functional outcome after complex nerve lesions (Campbell, 2008). Because of extensive fibrosis and fatty degeneration of muscle tissue following prolonged muscle denervation, the capacity for functional restoration becomes limited and eventually impossible (Fu and Gordon, 1995; Kobayashi et al., 1997). Sensory nerve transfer for muscle reinnervation is believed to prevent irreversible atrophy of a muscle preceding the motor reinnervation (Bain et al., 2001; Li et al., 2013; Cederna et al., 2015). Nevertheless, the underlying neurobiology of this phenomenon is poorly understood (Zhao et al., 2004).

The motor function of a muscle relies on the integrity of the motor unit with its essential components (Lichtman and Sanes, 2003; Li et al., 2018). The neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is known to be a dynamic entity with remarkable plastic capacities, which is able to remodel as a consequence of specific requirements of ingrowing axons (Nishizawa et al., 2006; Arnold et al., 2014; Ouanounou et al., 2016). In the native state, somatic efferent fibers are indispensable for the functioning of NMJ (Sanes and Lichtman, 1999). Rewiring motor nerve fibers from one motor neural source to another target muscle has been shown to be a successful approach in restoration of motor function (Aszmann et al., 2015; Bergmeister et al., 2019; Ortiz-Catalan et al., 2020). The effect of different neuronal sources (e.g., somatic efferent and visceral efferent axons) on the reinnervation of an alternate target organ is scarcely explored (Langley and Anderson, 1904; Brushart, 1988).

In this study we investigated the neurobiological mechanisms behind the phenomenon of spontaneous functional restoration of facial muscles in the rat. Parasympathetic nerve fibers regenerated via the infraorbital nerve to the facial muscles establishing functional NMJs, which resulted in a change of muscle fiber type and subsequent functional recovery (Fig. 1). This demonstrates that parasympathetic fibers have the capacity of innervating denervated skeletal muscles.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of aberrant parasympathetic reinnervation of denervated facial muscles. Following facial nerve transection, ipsilateral whisker pad showed spontaneous movement 12 weeks after the denervation. Harvested dilator naris muscle showed muscle fiber change after denervation. The reinnervating fibers were traced to the parasympathetic neural source in the pterygopalatine ganglion. The route of the parasympathetic fibers was established by electrophysiological testing via the sensory infraorbital nerve.

Materials and Methods

Animals and study design

Forty Sprague Dawley rats (male, age 8–10 weeks, weighing ∼400 g) were used in this study. The resection procedure of the facial nerve was performed in all rats as described previously (Tetzlaff et al., 1988; Tereshenko et al., 2021). Video assessment of the movement of the whiskers was performed 2, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after the surgery (n = 15). An additional group of unoperated rats was included to assess the whisker movement score (n = 15). The facial muscles on the denervated and contralateral healthy sides were harvested 12 weeks after the surgery for the whole-mount immunofluorescent staining (n = 15). Retrograde labeling was performed by means of intramuscular application of the retrograde tracer (n = 5) 12 weeks after the surgery. Qualitative assessment of the neural pathway for reinnervating axons was performed by stimulating the infraorbital nerve 12 weeks after denervation (n = 5). Subsequently, muscles from operated and healthy sides were harvested for muscle fiber type staining. Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna and the Austrian Ministry for Research and Science (reference number, Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research, and Economy 66.009/0302-V/II/3b/2019).

Surgery

All surgeries were performed under standardized conditions. Ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg) were injected intraperitoneally preoperatively. Anesthesia was induced by inhalation of isoflurane via an endotracheal tube, and subcutaneous piritramide injections (0.3 mg/kg) were administered for analgesia, which allowed for uneventful surgery. For postoperative analgesia, piritramide and glucose were added to the drinking water (two ampules Dipidolor equaling 30 mg piritramide plus 10 ml 10% glucose solution in 250 ml drinking water) for 5 postoperative days.

The facial nerve main trunk and auricular posterior nerve were transected distal to the stylomastoid foramen as described previously (Tereshenko et al., 2021). Briefly, the facial nerve and auricular posterior nerve were exposed via a preauricular incision and dissected toward their distal branches. The main trunk of the facial nerve was transected 1 mm distal to the stylomastoid foramen followed by transection of a 5 mm nerve segment to the proximal ends of all distal branches. Conclusively, the proximal and distal nerve stumps were cauterized to prevent spontaneous reinnervation.

Functional assessment of whisker movement

Video recordings of whisker movements were performed in unrestrained rats 2, 8, 12, and 16 weeks following surgery (n = 15) as well as in unoperated rats (n = 15). Video images of whisking behavior were sampled with a digital camera (12 megapixel, focal length 1.8) at 240 frames/s. For the functional assessment of the active exploration, the operated side was compared with the contralateral side using a 5-point score as follows: 0 = no movement, 1 = barely detectable movement, 2 = less significant movement, 3 = significant but asymmetric movement, 4 = symmetric movement (Farrag et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2011). The recovered muscle tone was analyzed by means of the whisker biometrics (n = 9). The static whisker position has been measured in the active explorative state right in the middle between maximal protraction and retraction. The images of whisker position were captured and selected with Adobe Photoshop CS6 (version 13.0). The geometrical model was adapted from the noninvasive video analysis by Tomov et al. (2002) and consisted of three reference points, (1) a point in the median sagittal line (perpendicular to a line connecting both orbits 2 and 3) at the end of the nose, (2) a point corresponding to the medial angle of the left orbit, and (3) a point corresponding to the medial angle of the right orbit (Guntinas-Lichius et al., 2001, 2002, 2007). Large vibrissae from the A-row were evaluated and depicted by two points, a point at the base and a point on the shaft 10 mm away from the base (Carvell and Simons, 1990). Despite the contralateral muscle hypertrophy on the unoperated side, the comparison between two sides allowed for dynamic evaluation of changes in whisker positioning (Rab et al., 2000; Tomov et al., 2002). This model allowed for evaluation of static muscle tone of the vibrissae by measuring the rostrally open angle between the midsagittal plane and the two-point vibrissa shaft (Ego-Stengel et al., 2019). Selected images were processed, and corresponding angles were measured using Adobe Illustrator (version 6.2) by one independent investigator (J.O.).

Whole-mount muscle analysis

For the facial muscle harvesting, the rats were fixated via left ventricular perfusion under deep anesthesia with 400 ml of NaCl 0.9% followed by 400 ml of 4% diluted PFA in 0.1 m PBS. After perfusion, the facialis muscles including the dilator nasi (MDN) and levator labii superioris (LLS) muscles were dissected from the denervated and control side and stored at 4°C in PBS containing 0.05% sodium azide to avoid bacterial contamination. Before immunolabeling, muscle whole mounts were shock frozen in ice-cold 2-methylbutane at −80°C and immediately thawed. Afterward, tissue was incubated overnight in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 (PBS-T) at room temperature. After this procedure. immunolabeling started. Muscles underwent whole-mount immunofluorescence staining using the following neuronal markers: chicken anti-neurofilament (1:2000; catalog #AB5539, Millipore; RRID:AB_11212161), goat anti-choline acetyl transferase (anti-ChAT; 1:100; catalog #AB144P, Millipore; RRID:AB_2079751), mouse anti-synaptophysin (1:200; catalog #ab94786, Abcam; RRID:AB_94786). Anti-neurofilament is a pan-neuronal marker. Anti-ChAT visualizes cholinergic axons, anti-synaptophysin synaptic vesicles, and anti-GAP43 nerve fibers during development and regeneration, and α-bungarotoxin is a snake venom that labels acetylcholine receptors. To visualize muscle fibers, we used phalloidin (1:200), a mushroom toxin that binds to actin filaments.

Triple-fluorescence staining

Four combinations of triple-labeling were used, (1) anti-neurofilament, α-bungarotoxin, and phalloidin; (2) anti-neurofilament, anti-ChAT, along with α-bungarotoxin; (3) anti-neurofilament, anti-synaptophysin, and α-bungarotoxin; and (4) anti-neurofilament, anti-GAP43, along with α-bungarotoxin.

Before antibody application, the tissue was blocked for 2 h with 10% normal goat serum (staining combination 1, 3, and 4) or 10% normal rabbit serum (staining combination 2). Then the tissue was incubated for 48 h with the primary antibodies diluted in PBS containing 1% PBS-T. Following extensive washing in PBS-T, tissue was incubated for 6 h with the secondary antibodies along with phalloidin or α-bungarotoxin. Finally, the tissue was rinsed again and mounted in 60% v/v glycerin plus 40% PBS. A more detailed description of immunolabeling of muscle whole mounts is provided by Blumer et al. (2020). For negative controls, primary antibodies were omitted, and secondary antibodies were used alone. In all cases, the omission of the primary antibodies resulted in a complete lack of immunostaining.

Confocal laser scanning microscope analysis

Fluorescently labeled muscle whole-mounts were analyzed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM; Olympus FV3000). A series of virtual CLSM sections of 1 µm thickness were cut through the structures of interest. Each section was photodocumented with a 1024 × 1024 pixel resolution, and 3D projections were rendered using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health). Triple-colored images were generated using lasers with excitation wavelengths of 488, 568, and 633 nm.

Quantification analysis

The number of NMJs was quantified in the three-dimensional images acquired by confocal imaging. The images were acquired in the middle of the MDN muscle to quantify as many NMJs as possible. The images were evaluated using software tools from Adobe Photoshop CS6 (version 13.0) by one independent investigator (V.T.). The surface area of the image was measured, and the total number of NMJs, innervated NMJs as well as polyinnervated NMJs, have been quantified in the control and operated MDNs (n = 8). The number of NMJs was extrapolated on a 1 mm2 of the muscle tissue.

Muscle fiber type composition

Muscle fiber types were assessed on both operated and contralateral MDN. After electrophysiological assessment, the entire MDN was carefully dissected and removed. Afterward, muscles were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (Tissue-Tek) using liquid-nitrogen-cooled isopentane and stored at −80°C for 24 h. Cross sections 10 µm thick of the embedded muscles were then obtained. A modified version of a previously described immunofluorescent protocol was used (Bergmeister et al., 2016, 2019). First, Wheat germ agglutinin conjugated Alexa Fluor 594 (1:250) was applied for 10 min to stain the muscle fiber membrane. Primary antibodies diluted in 0.1 m PBS with 10% goat serum against myosis heavy chain (MHC)-I (BA-F8; 1:50), MHC-IIa (SC-71; 1:600), and MHC-IIb (BF-F3; 1:100) were used and applied for 60 min (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). Afterward, the secondary antibodies against Alexa Fluor 633 immunoglobulin G2b (IgG2b; 1:250), Alexa Fluor 488 IgG1 (1:250), and Alexa Fluor 555 IgM (1:250) were applied for 60 min (Life Technologies). Entire cross sections of the muscle were acquired using a whole-slide scanner (Vectra Polaris, Akoya Biosciences) and subsequently analyzed using the Halo imaging analysis platform version 3.2.1851.421 (Indica Labs) by one independent investigator (M.L.).

Retrograde labeling

The neuronal sources of the parasympathetic fibers responsible for the reinnervation were traced using an intramuscular retrograde labeling procedure (n = 5). The facial muscles (MDN and LLS) were exposed 12 weeks following the denervation procedure. Using a 10 µl Hamilton microsyringe (catalog #7635-01, Hamilton Bonaduz) with a small hub removable needle (30 ga; catalog #7803-07, Hamilton Bonaduz), 3 µl of 2% Fast Blue (catalog #17740-5, Polysciences) was injected in both muscles. To prevent any leakage from the muscles, the needle was left within the muscle for 30 s followed by slow withdrawal. One week after the tracer application, left ventricular perfusion was performed as described above. The brain and the pterygopalatine ganglion on both sides were harvested and stored in 0.1 m PBS for 48 h. After dehydration in increasing sucrose/PBS solutions (10%, 25%, 40%), the samples were cryofixed and cut using a cryostat (Leica), the brainstem in 50 µm and the ganglia in 15 µm. The number of labeled neurons was quantified by one trained observer (V.T.). To avoid double counting of perikarya, the average nucleolus diameter was calculated to apply the Abercrombie correction.

Electrophysiology

The neural pathway of the parasympathetic fibers was determined by electrical stimulation of the infraorbital nerve and evaluation of the ipsilateral whisker movement (Movie 1). Electrical stimulation was delivered by a custom-built pulse generator (MiniVStim 18B, Competence Team for Implanted Devices, Center of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna) to elicit 10 short contractions (500 ms ON, 500 ms OFF). The stimulator generated symmetric, biphasic, rectangular, charge-balanced current pulses (amplitude, 8 mA; phase width, 2 ms) at a stimulation frequency of 70 Hz. The anode, a subdermal stainless steel needle electrode (diameter, 0.4 mm; Rhythmlink International) was placed into the middle portion of the infraorbital nerve. A surgical stainless steel hook was used as the anode. The movement of the whiskers was recorded via a standard camera.

Movie 1.

Experimental setting for the electrophysiological assessment. Intraoperative stimulation of the exposed infraorbital nerve (blue vessel loop) was performed under anesthesia. The isolated stimulation of the infraorbital nerve resulted in whisker movement.

Statistical analysis

In the group that underwent retrograde labeling, descriptive statistics were used for further analysis. The acquired data are presented either as absolute and relative values or as means and SDs. Whisker movement score (categorical variable) among different groups (2, 8, 12, and 16 weeks) was assessed using a Kruskal–Wallis test; the operated groups were compared with the control group using a one-sample Wilcoxon test. Results with a p value of <0.05 were considered significant. For the assessment of the angle of vibrissal orientation, normal distribution was checked with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and showed a Gaussian distribution in all groups. Angle of vibrissal orientation was compared between control and operated sides over the time course using a two-way ANOVA test. Angle of vibrissal orientation was compared with control and operated sides within each time period using a paired t test. The difference of vibrissal angle between control and operated sides (2, 8, 12, and 16 weeks) was compared over time using a one-way ANOVA test. Results with a p value of <0.05 were considered significant. In the NMJ assessment group, normal distribution was checked with the Shapiro–Wilk test. This showed a Gaussian distribution in all groups. The number of NMJs in control and operated muscles were compared using a paired t test. Results with a p value of <0.05 were considered significant. The number of muscle fibers as well as the number of cell nuclei between control and operated muscles were compared using a paired t test.

Data availability

All data are available in the main text of this article or in the supplementary video (Movie 1).

Results

Spontaneous whisker movement after facial nerve denervation

Motor function of the whiskers was spontaneously restored following facial nerve resection. The mystacial whisker pad is normally innervated by the buccal and marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerve (Henstrom et al., 2012). Functional video assessment showed partly restored whisker movement 12 weeks after the facial nerve neurotomy. Most of the rats showed an asymmetric but significant whisker movement (score, 3) 16 weeks after surgery. The whisker movement score was significantly different among all operated groups (2, 8, 12, and 16 weeks [p < 0.001, H-statistic H(3) = 38.2]. None of the rats achieved the highest whisker movement score (score, 4) at 2, 8, 12, or 16 weeks after surgery compared with the control group [p < 0.01, W-statistic W(1) = 120.0 for all groups; Fig. 2].

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Functional assessment of the recovered whisker movement. A, Whisker orientation assessment 2 weeks after surgery. B, Whisker orientation assessment 12 weeks after surgery. Whisker movement score 2 weeks [0 interquartile range (IQR; 0–1)], 8 weeks [1 (IQR 1–2)], 12 weeks [2 (IQR 1–3)] and 16 weeks [3 (IQR 2–3)] after surgery (n = 15) as well as the control group [4 (IQR 4–4); n = 15]. Whisker movement score was significantly different among all operated groups [2, 8, 12, and 16 weeks; p < 0.001, H(3) = 38.2]. C, None of the rats achieved the highest whisker movement score (score = 4) at 2, 8, 12, or 16 weeks after surgery compared with the control group [p < 0.01, W(1) = 120.0 for all groups]. Comparison of whisker orientation angle 2, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after surgery between control and operated sides was performed using a two-way ANOVA test. No significant difference was observed over the time course (p = 0.15, F(3,56) = 1.87). In the 2 and 8 weeks group there was a statistically significant difference between operated and control sides, 111.8 ± 10.4° versus 86 ± 12.8° (p < 0.01, t(8) = 3.8) and 103.9 ± 11.9° vs 90.5 ± 18.3° (p < 0.01, t(8) = 4.1). D, No difference was found between operated and control sides after 12 and 16 weeks, 100.4 ± 18.7° versus 94.1 ± 20.2° (p = 0.15, t(8) = 1.58) and 97.2 ± 15.6° versus 97.35 ± 14.5° (p = 0.94, t(4) = 0.08), respectively. Angle differences between control and operated sides were compared between 2, 8, 12, and 16 weeks groups. E, One-way ANOVA revealed significant reduction of the angle difference between control and operated sides from 2 until 16 weeks after surgery (p = 0.008, F(3,28) = 4.79).

The muscle tone was assessed by measuring the angle of vibrissal orientation in the neutral position. The angle of the vibrissae on the operated side (111.8 ± 10.4°) was significantly higher (i.e., lower muscle tone) compared with that of the control side (86 ± 12.8°) 2 weeks (p < 0.01, t(8) = 3.8); 8 weeks (103.9 ± 11.85° vs 90.5 ± 18.3°, p < 0.01, t(8) = 4.1) after surgery (Fig. 2A,B,D). From the 12th to the 16th week after denervation there was no significant difference between the operated and control sides (p = 0.15, t(8) = 1.58 for 12 weeks; p = 0.94, t(4) = 0.08 for 16 weeks; Fig. 2C). A two-way ANOVA test revealed no statistically significant angle difference between two operated and control sides over the time course (p = 0.15, F(3,56) = 1.87). The angle difference between control and operated sides reduced significantly from 2 until 16 weeks after surgery (p = 0.008, F(3,28) = 4.79; Fig. 2D).

Parasympathetic fibers form functional NMJs

Whole-mount staining of control muscles revealed axons with a large diameter that established synaptic contacts with α-bungarotoxin-labeled acetylcholine receptors (Fig. 3A,C). In contrast, whole-mount staining of the denervated facial muscles (Fig. 3B,D,E) revealed an abundance of thin nerve fibers suggesting newly ingrown axons. The LLS as well as the MDNs demonstrated anti-neurofilament (NF)-positive axons sprouting toward α-bungarotoxin-labeled acetylcholine receptors (Fig. 3B,D,E). Some axons established contacts with the postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors (Fig. 3D,E). Compared with the normal muscle, NMJs in the operated muscles were smaller and showed a dysmorphic structure. The total number of NMJs was significantly higher in the operated muscles compared with the control side (108.0 ± 23.5 vs 86.4 ± 16.0; p = 0.015, t(7) = 3.2). The number of polyinnervated NMJs (two or more axons) was higher in the operated group as well (8.3 ± 4.8 vs 2.8 ± 1.5; p = 0.01, t(7) = 3.5; Fig. 3E–G; Guntinas-Lichius et al., 2005). The portion of innervated NMJs was significantly higher in the control muscle (95.5 ± 1.1 vs 46.1 ± 16.1; p = 0.01, t(7) = 3.5; Fig. 3H).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Whole-mount staining of the NMJs and the reinnervation pattern. A, Whole-mount staining of the control MDN using anti-NF antibody, α-bungarotoxin (BTX), and phalloidin. Scale bar, 100 µm. B, In contrast, thin fibers reach the dysmorphic NMJs in a denervated MDN. Scale bar, 100 µm. C, Clear innervation of the NMJs in the control muscle is demonstrated via thick fibers. Scale 20 µm. D, Reinnervation of the dysmorphic and small NMJs is demonstrated in the operated muscle. Scale bar, 20 µm. E, An example of a NMJ reinnervated via two thin axons (2 white arrows) in an operated muscle. Scale bar, 20 µm. F, Number of polyinnervated NMJs is not significantly higher between control and operated muscles (paired t test, *p = 0.01). G, The total number of NMJs was significantly higher in the operated group (paired t test, *p = 0.0154). H, Number of innervated NMJs was significantly higher in the control muscle (paired t test, **p = 0.01).

Using anti-ChAT as a specific marker for cholinergic axons, whole-mount staining of control muscles revealed that axons contacting the muscle fibers had a cholinergic phenotype (Fig. 4A,B). In denervated muscles, axons contacting the muscle fiber were cholinergic as well (Fig. 4C–F). The thin diameter of the nerve fibers indicated their parasympathetic nature. To evaluate that newly formed nerve fibers establish functional connections with the muscle fibers, staining with anti-synaptophysin was done. Synaptophysin is a synaptic vesicle protein and present at the presynaptic site of neurons. It is supposed that synaptophysin plays a role in neurotransmitter release (De Camilli et al., 1988). In control muscles, all α-bungarotoxin NMJs exhibited synaptophysin signals (Fig. 5A,C). In operated muscles, synaptophysin was associated with reinnervated NMJs, whereas NMJs without axonal support exhibited no synaptophysin signal (Fig. 5B,D). This suggests that reinnervated NMJs are highly specialized and capable of synaptic transmission (Valtorta et al., 2004).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Reinnervation pattern via parasympathetic fibers of denervated facial muscles. A, B, Whole-mount staining showed the specific cholinergic nature of somatic efferent fibers in the control MDN. Scale bars: A, 200 µm; B, 100 µm. C, D, Magnified image shows somatic efferent fibers with thick diameters Reinnervation pattern of the denervated MDN demonstrates thin cholinergic fibers reaching to the NMJs. Scale bar, 100 µm. E, F, Magnified images of the ChAT-positive parasympathetic fibers reaching to the NMJs. Scale bar, 20 µm.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Whole-mount staining reveals functional connectivity of the NMJs and newly sprouting nature of the axons. A, C, NMJs of the control MDN. All NMJs exhibit synaptophysin immunoreactivity. Scale bars: A, 100 µm; C, 20 µm. B, D, NMJs in a denervated MDN. Only NMJs with adjacent axons are synaptophysin positive indicating the ability of the nerve endings to produce functional connections with the muscle fiber. Scale bars: B, 100 µm; D, 20 µm.

Muscle fiber composition changes following autonomic reinnervation

The muscle fiber composition changed after the spontaneous autonomic reinnervation. The original muscle fiber population of the MDN consists of the MHCIIa (291 ± 71) and MHCIIb (336 ± 83) types. Compared with the extremity skeletal muscles, no MHCI (slow) fibers were found in the MDN (Bergmeister et al., 2019). The muscle fiber population in the reinnervated MDN changed toward purely MHCIIa fiber types, indicating its intermediate twitch nature (Fig. 6). The number of the MHCIIa type in the autonomically reinnervated MDN (336 ± 82) did not significantly differ from that of the control side (290 ± 70; p = 0.57, t(3) = 0.62; Fig. 6E). The overall number of muscle fibers was lower in the denervated group (336 ± 82) compared with that of the control (983 ± 195; p = 0.013, t(3) = 5.3).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Muscle fiber population of the dilator nasi muscle. A, C, Control MDN displays a mixed muscle fiber population of 692 ± 147 MHCIIb (*red) and 291 ± 71 MHCIIa (°green) types. B, D, Autonomically reinnervated MDN consist exclusively of the MHCIIa type (336 ± 83). No centrally located DAPI-positive signals were observed in the operated muscle. Scale bars: A, B, 400 µm; C, D, 50 µm. E, No statistically significant difference was observed regarding the number of MHCIIa type fibers between operated and control muscles (paired t test, p = 0.57). F, The nuclei number was not statistically different between control and operated muscles (paired t test, p = 0.28).

The number of the cell nuclei in the reinnervated MDN was similar to the control side (1126 ± 137 vs 1371 ± 275; p = 0.28, t(3) = 1.3; Fig. 6F). Moreover, no DAPI-positive signals were found located centrally within the muscle fibers. These findings suggest that the parasympathetic input is sufficient to prevent a chronic denervation process in the denervated MDN (Chargé and Rudnicki, 2004).

Neuronal sources of the reinnervating fibers

The reinnervating parasympathetic axons were back to their origin in the pterygopalatine ganglion (Fig. 7). Following the intramuscular application of the retrograde tracer to the LLS and MDN, no fluorescent signals were found within the brainstem (n = 5). Lack of evidence for stained motor neurons within the brainstem suggests that no axons of somatic efferent nature reached the denervated facial muscles. This excludes somatic efferent reinnervation of the denervated facial muscles via any of the motor cranial nerves. The ipsilateral geniculate ganglion did not show any positive signal as well. The pterygopalatine ganglion showed 46 ± 10 labeled cell bodies, confirming their parasympathetic nature (n = 5).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Immunofluorescence image of the retrogradely labeled pterygopalatine ganglion. One week after intramuscular application (dilator nasi and levator labii superioris muscles) of a retrograde tracer (Fast Blue), the ganglion was harvested (n = 5). The quantification analysis revealed 46 ± 10 labeled cell bodies within the pterygopalatine ganglion.

Autonomic nerve fibers reinnervate facial muscles via the infraorbital nerve

The neural route of the parasympathetic fibers was assessed via electrophysiological stimulation (Movie 1). Twelve weeks following the denervation surgery, the whisker movement could be elicited through ipsilateral stimulation of the infraorbital nerve (n = 5). No movement of the contralateral whisker pad was observed. This qualitative assessment suggests that parasympathetic axons travel via the infraorbital nerve to the denervated muscles and build new functional neuromuscular junctions.

Discussion

Different nerve fiber types are believed to be predestined for specific innervation of their target end organs (Lumsden and Davies, 1983; Sanes and Lichtman, 2001). Pathologic conditions, however, may disrupt natural neural connections resulting in dysfunctional reinnervation (Gordon, 2020). The remodeling capacity of some target end organs (e.g., muscles, mechanoreceptors) allows for functional connections with axons from an alternate neuronal source but of the same neuronal quality (Bergmeister et al., 2019; Luft et al., 2021). Yet, the capability of a target organ being reinnervated by a foreign axon type remains largely unknown (Brunelli et al., 2005). The most striking finding of this study is that under deprivation of original somatic efferent input, the facial neuromuscular system undergoes functional and morphologic remodeling via autonomic nerve fibers. We demonstrated the parasympathetic nature behind the spontaneous recovery of whisker movement in a chronic denervation model in the rat. The newly ingrown postganglionic parasympathetic fibers traveled via the infraorbital nerve from the pterygopalatine ganglion to the denervated facial muscles and changed their muscle fiber population to a slower twitching (MHCIIa) type.

Although the neural plasticity of the CNS has been extensively investigated under various pathologic conditions (Cauraugh and Summers, 2005; Kleim and Jones, 2008; Sturma et al., 2020), the plastic capacity of the peripheral nervous system, particularly in the neuromuscular system, is poorly understood (Grinnell and Herrera, 1981). In contrast to post-traumatic cortical plasticity, muscle denervation triggers plastic remodeling, which allows functional reinnervation via other neuronal sources. This phenomenon was originally demonstrated by Flourens in 1828, where upper and lower trunks of the brachial plexus in the rooster were cross-coaptated, resulting in functional cross-reinnervation of the wing muscles (Flourens, 1828). Subsequently, nerve transfer surgeries have become a feasible procedure in experimental and clinical settings because of plastic properties of the skeletal muscles (Oberlin et al., 1994; Bergmeister et al., 2019; Luft et al., 2021). Our findings, however, further expand the understanding of muscular plastic capacity, showing possible functional reinnervation via autonomic sources as well.

The parasympathetic nervous system is a part of the autonomic nervous system regulating visceral organs and blood vessels (Browning and Travagli, 2014). Despite involuntary properties of the parasympathetic system, it resembles the somatic efferent system in many ways. The parasympathetic as well as somatic efferent systems are cholinergic in nature (Sanes and Lichtman, 2001), and the effector of both systems is muscle tissue. However, smooth muscles (targeted by the parasympathetic system) and skeletal muscles (targeted by the somatic efferent system) differ in their ultrastructural morphology, physiology, and embryogenesis (Waite and Li, 1993; Somlyo and Somlyo, 1994; Eddinger, 1998). A previous study reported on the sympathetic axons in the extracranial facial nerve, which highlighted their possible contribution to the maintenance and modulation of neuromuscular junctions (Takeuchi et al., 1993; Tereshenko et al., 2022). One of the intriguing questions is whether the neural input is essential for differentiated properties of the muscle tissue and if it can determine not only the different transcriptome activations but remodel morphologic and physiologic properties of muscle tissue as well (de Medinaceli and Rawlings, 1987; Weng et al., 2018). Effects of redirecting autonomic neural inputs to a skeletal muscle are scarcely explored (Coget and Rousseau, 1983; Flumerfelt et al., 1986; Delorme et al., 1997; Heaton et al., 2014; Gordon, 2020). Interestingly, some studies investigated preganglionic retrograde reinnervation of the skeletal muscle by redirecting the distal stump of the vagus nerve to the sternomastoid muscle without involvement of central neural input (Coget and Rousseau, 1983; Delorme et al., 1997; Gordon, 2020). The lack of neuronal support from the CNS does not allow for voluntary muscular contraction, which questions the purpose of surgically redirecting preganglionic autonomic fibers to a skeletal muscle (e.g., via the vagus or trigeminal nerves) in the clinical routine. However, one study reported that the reinnervated striated muscles changed expression profiles in the redirected motor neuronal sources, indicating retrograde influence of the end organ on the neuronal sources (McWilliam et al., 1995). Others studied autonomic reinnervation of a skeletal muscle from central neuronal sources (Flumerfelt et al., 1986); however, neither functional assessment nor the differentiation between sympathetic and parasympathetic input have been performed. Our data showed specific immunofluorescent evidence of the parasympathetic nature of the sprouting reinnervating fibers (Figs. 4, 5). Moreover, the retrograde tracing trial demonstrated an unambiguous central origin of the postganglionary parasympathetic fibers in the pterygopalatine ganglion. Nevertheless, the pterygopalatine ganglion might not be the single source of the parasympathetic axons. The otic ganglion can serve as another source of the regenerating axons as well. Hence, we showed that postganglionic fibers of the parasympathetic system are capable of establishing functional neuromuscular junctions within a denervated striated skeletal muscle. These findings further increase our understanding of the neuroplastic potential of the autonomic nervous system.

The ability of the parasympathetic system to reinnervate a striated skeletal muscle points out the extended plastic capacity of a skeletal muscle as well. Different muscle fiber types are defined by the MHC isoforms, which are the main determinants for muscular properties (e.g., force–velocity, muscle tone, fatigue resistance, contraction speed, etc.; Schiaffino and Reggiani, 2011). A denervated muscle recapitulates embryonic myogenesis resulting in expression of developmental MHC isoforms (Sartore et al., 1952; Schiaffino and Reggiani, 2011), which are replaced by adult MHC isoforms depending on the reinnervating nerve activity. In case of the muscle reinnervation, muscle fiber differentiation is dictated by a nerve activity-dependent pathway. This results in slow- or fast-twitch-like muscle fiber change corresponding with the firing pattern of reinnervating slow or fast motoneurons (Pette and Vrbová, 1999; Bergmeister et al., 2019). A long-term denervated muscle undergoes a fast-like muscle fiber change triggered by default activation of the fast gene program (Whalen et al., 1990; Esser et al., 1993). Interestingly, the dilator nasi muscle in the rat contains only fast (MHCIIb) and intermediate (MHCIIa) fibers and lacks slow muscle fibers (MHCI; Jergovi et al., 2001), which we confirmed in our study using a new quintuple immunofluorescent staining (Fig. 6). We demonstrated a total muscle fiber change toward MHCIIa with elimination of MHCIIb fibers after the parasympathetic reinnervation, making the dilator nasi a slower muscle. Moreover, functional assessment of the movement of the whiskers showed not only dynamic functional recovery but recovered muscle tone of the facial muscles as well. This suggests that the parasympathetic nervous system remodeled facial muscles into a slower kind, and, hence, is responsible for recovery of the muscle tone. This corresponds with an essential role of the parasympathetic system in muscle tone control of the smooth muscles (Canning, 2006). These findings showed the remodeling adaptability of the denervated facial muscles under reinnervation via alien neural sources (parasympathetic system).

The outlined plastic properties of the neuromuscular system may be considered in the treatment strategies of diverse neuropathological conditions. Long-standing muscle atrophy may become irreversible if no motor reinnervation occurs (Fu and Gordon, 1995). A recent study showed the quantal release of acetylcholine itself activates acetylcholine receptors, prevents muscular atrophy, and favors subsequent muscular reinnervation (Cisterna et al., 2020). This indicates the ability of the parasympathetic fibers to prevent muscular atrophy by remodeling muscle morphology in our study. This phenomenon may be considered as a part of the concept of neuromuscular reconstruction, which is based on the replace like with like principle. Nevertheless, if there is no clinically justifiable option to replace a motor nerve with another one, a so-called sensory protection could become an alternative (Bain et al., 2001, 2008). Using a sensory nerve as a preliminary muscular innervation for subsequent motor reinnervation is a surgically feasible concept, but its fundamental neurobiological processes are not understood. Therefore, this concept is scarcely applied in the clinical routine, but some experimental studies showed sensory protection results in successful muscle atrophy prevention or facilitates motor muscle reinnervation (Hynes et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2001; Li et al., 2013; Placheta et al., 2015; Hosseinian et al., 2018). Because all cutaneous nerves contain autonomic fibers (Roosterman et al., 2006), our findings suggest a possible neurobiological explanation of the sensory protection phenomenon, which is because of the parasympathetic reinnervation. This new paradigm into the sensory protection mechanisms can revolutionize treatment approaches of facial palsy, nerve lesions in the lower extremity, as well as proximal nerve injuries of the brachial plexus. Furthermore, our findings may explain the phenomenon of the spontaneous functional recovery after surgical resection of the facial nerve, which has been anecdotally reported (Martin and Helsper, 1957; Trojaborg and Siemssen, 1972; Hakami and Mosavy, 1976), but the underlying neurobiological mechanisms have remained elusive so far.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by European Research Council Grant 810346. We thank Anna-Maria Willensdorfer and Sylvia Gerges for technical assistance in the experimental trials and Aron Cserveny for illustrations of the study design and methodological approach.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Oskar C. Aszmann at oskar.aszmann{at}meduniwien.ac.at

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Arnold AS,
    2. Gill J,
    3. Christe M,
    4. Ruiz R,
    5. McGuirk S,
    6. St-Pierre J,
    7. Tabares L,
    8. Handschin C
    (2014) Morphological and functional remodelling of the neuromuscular junction by skeletal muscle PGC-1a. Nat Commun 5:3569. doi:10.1038/ncomms4569 pmid:24686533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Aszmann OC,
    2. Roche AD,
    3. Salminger S,
    4. Paternostro-Sluga T,
    5. Herceg M,
    6. Sturma A,
    7. Hofer C,
    8. Farina D
    (2015) Bionic reconstruction to restore hand function after brachial plexus injury: a case series of three patients. The Lancet 385:2183–2189. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61776-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Bain J,
    2. Veltri K,
    3. Chamberlain D,
    4. Fahnestock M
    (2001) Improved functional recovery of denervated skeletal muscle after temporary sensory nerve innervation. Neuroscience 103:503–510. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00577-7 pmid:11246164
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bain JR,
    2. Hason Y,
    3. Veltri K,
    4. Fahnestock M,
    5. Quartly C
    (2008) Clinical application of sensory protection of denervated muscle. J Neurosurg 109:955–961. doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/109/11/0955 pmid:18976091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bergmeister KD,
    2. Gröger M,
    3. Aman M,
    4. Willensdorfer A,
    5. Manzano-Szalai K,
    6. Salminger S,
    7. Aszmann OC
    (2016) Automated muscle fiber type population analysis with ImageJ of whole rat muscles using rapid myosin heavy chain immunohistochemistry. Muscle Nerve 54:292–299. doi:10.1002/mus.25033 pmid:26788932
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bergmeister KD,
    2. Aman M,
    3. Muceli S,
    4. Vujaklija I,
    5. Manzano-Szalai K,
    6. Unger E,
    7. Byrne RA,
    8. Scheinecker C,
    9. Riedl O,
    10. Salminger S,
    11. Frommlet F,
    12. Borschel GH,
    13. Farina D,
    14. Aszmann OC
    (2019) Peripheral nerve transfers change target muscle structure and function. Sci Adv 5:eaau2956. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau2956
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Bergmeister KD,
    2. Große-Hartlage L,
    3. Daeschler SC,
    4. Rhodius P,
    5. Böcker A,
    6. Beyersdorff M,
    7. Kern AO,
    8. Kneser U,
    9. Harhaus L
    (2020) Acute and long-term costs of 268 peripheral nerve injuries in the upper extremity. PLoS One 15:e0229530. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229530 pmid:32251479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Blumer R,
    2. Streicher J,
    3. Carrero-Rojas G,
    4. Calvo PM,
    5. de la Cruz RR,
    6. Pastor AM
    (2020) Palisade endings have an exocytotic machinery but lack acetylcholine receptors and distinct acetylcholinesterase activity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 61:31. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.14.31 pmid:33369640
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Browning KN,
    2. Travagli RA
    (2014) Central nervous system control of gastrointestinal motility and secretion and modulation of gastrointestinal functions. Compr Physiol 4:1339–1368. doi:10.1002/cphy.c130055 pmid:25428846
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Brunelli G,
    2. Spano PF,
    3. Barlati S,
    4. Guarneri B,
    5. Barbon A,
    6. Bresciani R,
    7. Pizzi M
    (2005) Glutamatergic reinnervation through peripheral nerve graft dictates assembly of glutamatergic synapses at rat skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:8752–8757. doi:10.1073/pnas.0500530102 pmid:15937120
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Brushart TME
    (1988) Preferential reinnervation of motor nerves by regenerating motor axons. J Neurosci 8:1026–1031. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-03-01026.1988
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Campbell WW
    (2008) Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injury. Clin Neurophysiol 119:1951–1965. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.018 pmid:18482862
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Canning BJ
    (2006) Reflex regulation of airway smooth muscle tone. J Appl Physiol 101:971–985. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00313.2006 pmid:16728519
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Carvell GE,
    2. Simons DJ
    (1990) Biometric analyses of vibrissal tactile discrimination in the rat. J Neurosci 10:2638–2648. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-08-02638.1990
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Cauraugh JH,
    2. Summers JJ
    (2005) Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol 75:309–320. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.001 pmid:15885874
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Cederna PS,
    2. Nghiem B,
    3. Hu Y,
    4. Sando I,
    5. Urbanchek M
    (2015) Sensory protection to enhance functional recovery following proximal nerve injuries: current trends. Plast Aesthet Res 2:202. doi:10.4103/2347-9264.156982
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Chargé SBP,
    2. Rudnicki MA
    (2004) Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiol Rev 84:209–238. doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2003 pmid:14715915
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Cisterna BA,
    2. Vargas AA,
    3. Puebla C,
    4. Fernández P,
    5. Escamilla R,
    6. Lagos CF,
    7. Matus MF,
    8. Vilos C,
    9. Cea LA,
    10. Barnafi E,
    11. Gaete H,
    12. Escobar DF,
    13. Cardozo CP,
    14. Sáez JC
    (2020) Active acetylcholine receptors prevent the atrophy of skeletal muscles and favor reinnervation. Nat Commun 11:1073. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14063-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Coget J,
    2. Rousseau JP
    (1983) Reinnervation of striated muscle by peripheral vagal fibres cut above or below the nodose ganglion in the cat and rabbit. J Physiol 335:481–493. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014545 pmid:6875889
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. De Camilli P,
    2. Vitadello M,
    3. Canevini MP,
    4. Zanoni R,
    5. Jahn R,
    6. Gorio A
    (1988) The synaptic vesicle proteins synapsin I and synaptophysin (protein p38) are concentrated both in efferent and afferent nerve endings of the skeletal muscle. J Neurosci 8:1625–1631. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-05-01625.1988
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Delorme P,
    2. Rousseau A,
    3. Bernard J,
    4. Leek BF,
    5. Rousseau JP
    (1997) Ultrastructural changes in the nerve fiber population of anastomosed vagal and spinal accessory nerves in the sheep. Anat Rec 248:129–136. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199705)248:1<129::AID-AR15>3.0.CO;2-R
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. de Medinaceli L,
    2. Rawlings RR
    (1987) Is it possible to predict the outcome of peripheral nerve injuries? A probability model based on prospects for regenerating neurites. BioSystems 20:243–258. doi:10.1016/0303-2647(87)90032-3 pmid:3620606
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Eddinger TJ
    (1998) Myosin heavy chain isoforms and dynamic contractile properties: skeletal versus smooth muscle. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 119:425–434. doi:10.1016/S0305-0491(98)00003-0 pmid:9734327
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ego-Stengel V,
    2. Abbasi A,
    3. Larroche M,
    4. Lassagne H,
    5. Boubenec Y,
    6. Shulz DE
    (2019) Mechanical coupling through the skin affects whisker movements and tactile information encoding. J Neurophysiol 122:1606–1622. doi:10.1152/jn.00863.2018 pmid:31411931
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Esser K,
    2. Gunning P,
    3. Hardeman E
    (1993) Nerve-dependent and -independent patterns of mRNA expression in regenerating skeletal muscle. Dev Biol 159:173–183. doi:10.1006/dbio.1993.1231 pmid:8365559
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Farrag TY,
    2. Lehar M,
    3. Verhaegen P,
    4. Carson KA,
    5. Byrne PJ
    (2007) Effect of platelet rich plasma and fibrin sealant on facial nerve regeneration in a rat model. Laryngoscope 117:157–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Filimon F
    (2010) Human cortical control of hand movements: parietofrontal networks for reaching, grasping, and pointing. Neuroscientist 16:388–407. doi:10.1177/1073858410375468 pmid:20817917
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Flourens M
    (1828) Experiences sur la réunion ou cicatrisation des plaies de la moelle épinière et des nerfs. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 13:113–122.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Flumerfelt BA,
    2. Kiernan JA,
    3. Krcek JP,
    4. Sholdice J
    (1986) Reinnervation of skeletal muscle in the tongue by preganglionic parasympathetic vagal neurons. J Anat 146:117–130. pmid:2447049
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Fu SY,
    2. Gordon T
    (1995) Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged denervation. J Neurosci 15:3886–3895. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03886.1995
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Gatesy SM,
    2. Middleton KM
    (1997) Bipedalism, flight, and the evolution of theropod locomotor diversity. J Vertebr Paleontol 17:308–329. doi:10.1080/02724634.1997.10010977
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Gordon T
    (2020) Peripheral nerve regeneration and muscle reinnervation. IJMS 21:8652. doi:10.3390/ijms21228652
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Grinnell AD,
    2. Herrera AA
    (1981) Specificity and plasticity of neuromuscular connections: long-term regulation of motoneuron function. Prog Neurobiol 17:203–282. doi:10.1016/0301-0082(81)90006-X
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Grinsell D,
    2. Keating CP
    (2014) Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. BioMed Res Int 2014:698256. doi:10.1155/2014/698256 pmid:25276813
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Guntinas-Lichius O,
    2. Angelov DN,
    3. Tomov TL,
    4. Dramiga J,
    5. Neiss WF,
    6. Wewetzer K
    (2001) Transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells stimulates the collateral sprouting from axotomized adult rat facial motoneurons. Exp Neurol 172:70–80. doi:10.1006/exnr.2001.7774 pmid:11681841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Guntinas-Lichius O,
    2. Wewetzer K,
    3. Tomov TL,
    4. Azzolin N,
    5. Kazemi S,
    6. Streppel M,
    7. Neiss WF,
    8. Angelov DN
    (2002) Transplantation of olfactory mucosa minimizes axonal branching and promotes the recovery of vibrissae motor performance after facial nerve repair in rats. J Neurosci 22:7121–7131. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-16-07121.2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Guntinas-Lichius O,
    2. Irintchev A,
    3. Streppel M,
    4. Lenzen M,
    5. Grosheva M,
    6. Wewetzer K,
    7. Neiss WF,
    8. Angelov DN
    (2005) Factors limiting motor recovery after facial nerve transection in the rat: combined structural and functional analyses. Eur J Neurosci 21:391–402. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03877.x pmid:15673438
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Guntinas-Lichius O,
    2. Hundeshagen G,
    3. Paling T,
    4. Angelov DN
    (2007) Impact of different types of facial nerve reconstruction on the recovery of motor function: an experimental study in adult rats. Neurosurgery 61:1276–1285. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000306107.70421.a4 pmid:18162908
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Hakami M,
    2. Mosavy SH
    (1976) Spontaneous return of function after surgical excision of the seventh cranial nerve in parotid tumor surgery. Am J Surg 132:394–395. doi:10.1016/0002-9610(76)90402-5 pmid:962018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Heaton JT,
    2. Sheu SH,
    3. Hohman MH,
    4. Knox CJ,
    5. Weinberg JS,
    6. Kleiss IJ,
    7. Hadlock TA
    (2014) Rat whisker movement after facial nerve lesion: evidence for autonomic contraction of skeletal muscle. Neuroscience 265:9–20. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.038
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Henstrom D,
    2. Hadlock T,
    3. Lindsay R,
    4. Knox CJ,
    5. Malo J,
    6. Vakharia KT,
    7. Heaton JT
    (2012) The convergence of facial nerve branches providing whisker pad motor supply in rats: implications for facial reanimation study. Muscle Nerve 45:692–697. doi:10.1002/mus.23232 pmid:22499096
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Hosseinian MA,
    2. Shirian S,
    3. Loron AG,
    4. Ebrahimy AA,
    5. Hayatolah GH
    (2018) Distal sensory to distal motor nerve anastomosis can protect lower extremity muscle atrophy in a murine model. Eur J Plast Surg 41:9–14. doi:10.1007/s00238-017-1313-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Hynes NM,
    2. Bain JR,
    3. Thoma A,
    4. Veltri K,
    5. Maguire JA
    (1997) Preservation of denervated muscle by sensory protection in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg 13:337–343. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1006413
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Jergovi D,
    2. Stål P,
    3. Lidman D,
    4. Lindvall B,
    5. Hildebrand C
    (2001) Changes in a rat facial muscle after facial nerve injury and repair. Muscle Nerve 24:1202–1212. doi:10.1002/mus.1133 pmid:11494274
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Kleim JA,
    2. Jones TA
    (2008) Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 51:S225–S239. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Kobayashi J,
    2. Mackinnon SE,
    3. Watanabe O,
    4. Ball DJ,
    5. Gu XM,
    6. Hunter DA,
    7. Kuzon WM
    (1997) The effect of duration of muscle denervation on functional recovery in the rat model. Muscle Nerve 20:858–866. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199707)20:7<858::AID-MUS10>3.0.CO;2-O
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Langley JN,
    2. Anderson HK
    (1904) The union of different kinds of nerve fibres. J Physiol 31:365–391. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1904.sp001042 pmid:16992733
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Lee SK,
    2. Wolfe SW
    (2000) Peripheral nerve injury and repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8:243–252. doi:10.5435/00124635-200007000-00005 pmid:10951113
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Xiong WC,
    3. Mei L
    (2018) Neuromuscular junction formation, aging, and disorders. Annu Rev Physiol 80:159–188. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034255 pmid:29195055
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Li QT,
    2. Zhang PX,
    3. Yin XF,
    4. Han N,
    5. Kou YH,
    6. Deng JX,
    7. Jiang BG
    (2013) Functional recovery of denervated skeletal muscle with sensory or mixed nerve protection: a pilot study. PLoS One 8:e79746. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079746 pmid:24244555
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Lichtman JW,
    2. Sanes JR
    (2003) Watching the neuromuscular junction. J Neurocytol 32:767–775. doi:10.1023/B:NEUR.0000020622.58471.37 pmid:15034266
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Luft M,
    2. Klepetko J,
    3. Muceli S,
    4. Ibáñez J,
    5. Tereshenko V,
    6. Festin C,
    7. Laengle G,
    8. Politikou O,
    9. Maierhofer U,
    10. Farina D,
    11. Aszmann OC,
    12. Bergmeister KD
    (2021) Proof of concept for multiple nerve transfers to a single target muscle. ELife 10:e71312 doi:10.1101/2021.07.09.451759.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Lumsden AGS,
    2. Davies AM
    (1983) Earliest sensory nerve fibres are guided to peripheral targets by attractants other than nerve growth factor. Nature 306:786–788. doi:10.1038/306786a0 pmid:6656880
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Mackinnon SE,
    2. Novak CB
    (1999) Nerve transfers: new options for reconstruction following nerve injury. Hand Clinics 15:643–666. doi:10.1016/S0749-0712(21)00485-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Martin H,
    2. Helsper JT
    (1957) Spontaneous return of function following surgical section or excision of the seventh cranial nerve in the surgery of parotid tumors. Ann Surg 146:715–727. doi:10.1097/00000658-195711000-00001 pmid:13479042
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. McWilliam PN,
    2. Maqbool A,
    3. Batten TFC,
    4. Kaye JC
    (1995) Influence of peripheral targets on the expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in rat cranial motoneurones. J Neurobiol 28:506–514. doi:10.1002/neu.480280410 pmid:8592110
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Nishizawa T,
    2. Yamashia S,
    3. McGrath KF,
    4. Tamaki H,
    5. Kasuga N,
    6. Takekura H
    (2006) Plasticity of neuromuscular junction architectures in rat slow and fast muscle fibers following temporary denervation and reinnervation processes. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 27:607–615. doi:10.1007/s10974-006-9094-1 pmid:17051345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Oberlin C,
    2. Béal D,
    3. Leechavengvongs S,
    4. Salon A,
    5. Dauge MC,
    6. Sarcy JJ
    (1994) Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5–C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: anatomical study and report of four cases. J Hand Surg Am 19:232–237. doi:10.1016/0363-5023(94)90011-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Ortiz-Catalan M,
    2. Mastinu E,
    3. Sassu P,
    4. Aszmann O,
    5. Brånemark R
    (2020) Self-contained neuromusculoskeletal arm prostheses. N Engl J Med 382:1732–1738. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1917537 pmid:32348644
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Ouanounou G,
    2. Baux G,
    3. Bal T
    (2016) A novel synaptic plasticity rule explains homeostasis of neuromuscular transmission. Elife 5:e12190. doi:10.7554/eLife.12190
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Pette D,
    2. Vrbová G
    (1999) What does chronic electrical stimulation teach us about muscle plasticity? Muscle Nerve 22:666–677. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199906)22:6<666::AID-MUS3>3.0.CO;2-Z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Placheta E,
    2. Wood MD,
    3. Lafontaine C,
    4. Frey M,
    5. Gordon T,
    6. Borschel GH
    (2015) Macroscopic in vivo imaging of facial nerve regeneration in Thy1-GFP Rats. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 17:8–15. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2014.617 pmid:25317544
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Rab M,
    2. Neumayer C,
    3. Koller R,
    4. Kamolz LP,
    5. Haslik W,
    6. Gassner R,
    7. Giovanoli P,
    8. Schaden G,
    9. Frey M
    (2000) Histomorphology of rabbit thigh muscles: establishment of standard control values. J Anatomy 196:203–209. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19620203.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Roosterman D,
    2. Goerge T,
    3. Schneider SW,
    4. Bunnett NW,
    5. Steinhoff M
    (2006) Neuronal control of skin function: the skin as a neuroimmunoendocrine organ. Physiol Rev 86:1309–1379. doi:10.1152/physrev.00026.2005 pmid:17015491
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Sanes JR,
    2. Lichtman JW
    (1999) Development of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:389–442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Sanes JR,
    2. Lichtman JW
    (2001) Induction, assembly, maturation and maintenance of a postsynaptic apparatus. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:791–805. doi:10.1038/35097557 pmid:11715056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Sartore S,
    2. Gorza L,
    3. Schiaffino S
    (1952) Fetal myosin heavy chains in regenerating muscle. Nature 298:294–296.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Schiaffino S,
    2. Reggiani C
    (2011) Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev 91:1447–1531. doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2010 pmid:22013216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Schwartzman RJ,
    2. Grothusen J,
    3. Kiefer TR,
    4. Rohr P
    (2001) Neuropathic central pain. Arch Neurol 58:1547–1550. doi:10.1001/archneur.58.10.1547 pmid:11594911
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Somlyo AP,
    2. Somlyo AV
    (1994) Signal transduction and regulation in smooth muscle. Nature 372:231–236. doi:10.1038/372231a0 pmid:7969467
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Sturma A,
    2. Stamm T,
    3. Hruby LA,
    4. Bischof B,
    5. Salminger S,
    6. Gstoettner C,
    7. Prahm C,
    8. Pittermann A,
    9. Wakolbinger R,
    10. Hofer C,
    11. Farina D,
    12. Aszmann OC
    (2020) Rehabilitation of high upper limb amputees after targeted muscle reinnervation. J Hand Ther 35:58–66.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Sun F,
    2. Zhou K,
    3. Mi W,
    4. juan Qiu Jh
    (2011) Combined use of decellularized allogeneic artery conduits with autologous transdifferentiated adipose-derived stem cells for facial nerve regeneration in rats. Biomaterials 32:8118–8128. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.031 pmid:21816463
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Takeuchi Y,
    2. Chen XH,
    3. Miki T,
    4. Itoh M,
    5. Miyoshi S,
    6. Satoda T
    (1993) Superior cervical ganglionic origin of sympathetic fibers in the facial nerve, and their preganglionic spinal inputs: A WGA-HRP study in Macaca fuscata. Brain Res Bull 32:661–665. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(93)90170-G pmid:7693309
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Tereshenko V,
    2. Dotzauer DC,
    3. Maierhofer U,
    4. Festin C,
    5. Luft M,
    6. Laengle G,
    7. Politikou O,
    8. Klein HJ,
    9. Blumer R,
    10. Aszmann OC,
    11. Bergmeister KD
    (2021) Selective denervation of the facial dermato-muscular complex in the rat: experimental model and anatomical basis. Front Neuroanat 15:15: 650761. doi:10.3389/fnana.2021.650761 pmid:33828465
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Tereshenko V,
    2. Maierhofer U,
    3. Dotzauer DC,
    4. Laengle G,
    5. Schmoll M,
    6. Festin C,
    7. Luft M,
    8. Carrero Rojas G,
    9. Politikou O,
    10. Hruby LA,
    11. Klein HJ,
    12. Eisenhardt SU,
    13. Farina D,
    14. Blumer R,
    15. Bergmeister KD,
    16. Aszmann OC
    (2022) Newly identified axon types of the facial nerve unveil supplemental neural pathways in the innervation of the face. J Adv Res 24:91–98. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2022.04.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    1. Tetzlaff W,
    2. Graeber MB,
    3. Bisby MA,
    4. Kreutzberg GW
    (1988) Increased glial fibrillary acidic protein synthesis in astrocytes during retrograde reaction of the rat facial nucleus. Glia 1:90–95. doi:10.1002/glia.440010110 pmid:2976741
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Tomov TL,
    2. Guntinas-Lichius O,
    3. Grosheva M,
    4. Streppel M,
    5. Schraermeyer U,
    6. Neiss WF,
    7. Angelov DN
    (2002) An example of neural plasticity evoked by putative behavioral demand and early use of vibrissal hairs after facial nerve transection. Exp Neurol 178:207–218. doi:10.1006/exnr.2002.8040 pmid:12504880
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Trojaborg W,
    2. Siemssen S
    (1972) Reinnervation after resection of the facial nerve. Arch Neurol 26:17–24. doi:10.1001/archneur.1972.00490070035005 pmid:5007138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Valtorta F,
    2. Pennuto M,
    3. Bonanomi D,
    4. Benfenati F
    (2004) Synaptophysin: leading actor or walk-on role in synaptic vesicle exocytosis? BioEssays 26:445–453. doi:10.1002/bies.20012 pmid:15057942
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Waite PME,
    2. Li L
    (1993) Unmyelinated innervation of sinus hair follicles in rats. Anat Embryol 188:457–465. doi:10.1007/BF00190140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Gu Y,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Shen L,
    5. Li J
    (2001) Comparative study of different surgical procedures using sensory nerves or neurons for delaying atrophy of denervated skeletal muscle. J Hand Surg Am 26:326–331. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2001.22522 pmid:11279580
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Weng J,
    2. Zhang P,
    3. Yin X,
    4. Jiang B
    (2018) The whole transcriptome involved in denervated muscle atrophy following peripheral nerve injury. Front Mol Neurosci 11:69. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2018.00069 pmid:29563865
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Whalen RG,
    2. Harris JB,
    3. Butler-Browne GS,
    4. Sesodia S
    (1990) Expression of myosin isoforms during notexin-induced regeneration of rat soleus muscles. Dev Biol 141:24–40. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(90)90099-5 pmid:2391004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Zhao C,
    2. Veltri K,
    3. Li S,
    4. Bain JR,
    5. Fahnestock M
    (2004) NGF, BDNF, NT-3, and GDNF mRNA expression in rat skeletal muscle following denervation and sensory protection. J Neurotrauma 21:1468–1478. doi:10.1089/neu.2004.21.1468 pmid:15672636
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 42 (44)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 42, Issue 44
2 Nov 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Autonomic Nerve Fibers Aberrantly Reinnervate Denervated Facial Muscles and Alter Muscle Fiber Population
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Autonomic Nerve Fibers Aberrantly Reinnervate Denervated Facial Muscles and Alter Muscle Fiber Population
Vlad Tereshenko, Dominik C. Dotzauer, Matthias Luft, Joachim Ortmayr, Udo Maierhofer, Martin Schmoll, Christopher Festin, Genova Carrero Rojas, Johanna Klepetko, Gregor Laengle, Olga Politikou, Dario Farina, Roland Blumer, Konstantin D. Bergmeister, Oskar C. Aszmann
Journal of Neuroscience 2 November 2022, 42 (44) 8297-8307; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0670-22.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Autonomic Nerve Fibers Aberrantly Reinnervate Denervated Facial Muscles and Alter Muscle Fiber Population
Vlad Tereshenko, Dominik C. Dotzauer, Matthias Luft, Joachim Ortmayr, Udo Maierhofer, Martin Schmoll, Christopher Festin, Genova Carrero Rojas, Johanna Klepetko, Gregor Laengle, Olga Politikou, Dario Farina, Roland Blumer, Konstantin D. Bergmeister, Oskar C. Aszmann
Journal of Neuroscience 2 November 2022, 42 (44) 8297-8307; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0670-22.2022
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • autonomic nervous system
  • facial muscles
  • facial nerve
  • muscle fiber types
  • parasympathetic reinnervation
  • sensory protection

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Brain-behavior differences in pre-modern and modern lineages of domestic dogs
  • Microglia supports both the singular form of LTP expressed by the lateral perforant path and episodic memory
  • Inhibition of Rho-associated kinases ROCK1 and ROCK2 as a Therapeutic Strategy to Reactivate the Repressed FXN Gene in Friedreich Ataxia
Show more Research Articles

Systems/Circuits

  • Functional Roles of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide-Producing Neurons in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: Insights into Photic Entrainment and Circadian Regulation
  • Macroscale Traveling Waves Evoked by Single-Pulse Stimulation of the Human Brain
  • Multimodal Correspondence between Optogenetic fMRI, Electrophysiology, and Anatomical Maps of the Secondary Somatosensory Cortex in Nonhuman Primates
Show more Systems/Circuits
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.