Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Teresa Esch [Ph.D.]
Journal of Neuroscience 2 February 2022, 42 (5) 719; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.42.5.2022
Teresa Esch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Selective Role for Robo2 in Motor Axon Regeneration

Patricia L. Murphy, Jesse Isaacman-Beck, and Michael Granato

(see pages 762–776)

Unlike CNS axons, peripheral nerves can regenerate and reinnervate their targets after injury. This requires axons to navigate through an environment that has changed substantially since the axons' initial growth. Moreover, because individual axons within a nerve innervate different targets, they must follow different paths. Little is known about how regenerating axons are guided, but work in zebrafish has shown that a small group of Schwann cells provide cues that guide dorsally projecting motor axons. As motor axons leave the spinal cord, dorsally projecting and ventrally projecting axons travel in the same nerve, but they ultimately diverge to innervate different target muscles. After nerve transection, a group of Schwann cells near this branch point transiently increase expression of the collagen protein Col4a5 and the repulsive guidance cue Slit1a, which is anchored to the basement membrane by Col4a5. These molecules steer dorsal axons in the right direction. Murphy et al. report that the Slit receptor Robo2 also contributes to the guidance of dorsal axons at this choice point.

When all Schwann cells were made to express col4a5, dorsal axons grew normally during development, but made more errors than normal when regenerating after transection. This suggests that restricted expression of col4a5 at branch points is necessary for guiding dorsal axons selectively during regeneration. Knocking out Robo2, which is normally expressed in dorsal nerves, also increased the number of dorsal axons that followed errant trajectories during regeneration. Conversely, inducing the expression of Robo2 in ventral axons caused them to follow a dorsal trajectory. The latter effect was absent in Col4a5-deficient fish, however. Finally, time-lapse imaging revealed that Robo2-deficient dorsal axons were no more likely than controls to enter improper nerve tracts. But, unlike control axons, which soon stalled or retracted after making such errors, Robo2-deficient axons continued to extend.

These results suggest that Robo2 expression in dorsally projecting motor axons allows regenerating axons to recognize collagen-bound Slit1a at an essential choice point. If axons initially turn the wrong way, Slit1–Robo2 interactions prevent the axons from extending further. The stalled axons are likely pruned by different signaling molecules. Future work should identify these molecules and determine how stalled dorsal axons reinitiate growth in the proper direction.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

After nerve transection (at the site marked by box, top panel), many Robo2-deficient regenerating dorsal axons erroneously grow ventrally or laterally (pink arrowheads) instead of dorsally (green arrowheads). See Murphy et al. for details.

How Learning Alters Neurons and Ensembles in Gustatory Cortex

Elor Arieli, Nadia Younis, and Anan Moran

(see pages 909–921)

In gustatory cortex, tastes are encoded by the spatiotemporal pattern of activity across a large population of broadly tuned neurons. This population activity can be represented as a sequence of distinct network states, with different taste qualities being represented by different sequences. Notably, gustatory cortical activity evoked by a taste initially represents taste identity and then transitions to representing valence. Therefore, patterns elicited by a given taste change if the valence changes, as occurs with conditioned taste aversion (CTA). Like other forms of learning, CTA has acquisition and consolidation phases in which synaptic strength and the spiking of individual neurons changes. How these changes at the single-cell level relate to changes in population dynamics that drive behavior is unclear. To address this, Arieli et al. recorded the responses of multiple gustatory neurons to saccharin over a 48 h period, starting 24 h before LiCl was injected to induce CTA.

Many neurons in CTA animals showed altered responses to saccharin after LiCl injection, but individual neurons' responses changed in different directions (increases and decreases) and at different times. Nevertheless, averaging across the population revealed an overall increase in firing during the acquisition phase of CTA (1–3 h after LiCl injection) and during the consolidation phase (6–18 h after injection), with a return to baseline levels in the intermediate period (3–6 h), Notably, activity changes occurred predominantly in the late portion of the saccharin response, when population activity encodes taste valence. Importantly, when ensemble activity was represented as a vector rather than an average, saccharin responses were distinct from pretraining patterns during the intermediate as well as the consolidation phases of CTA. As expected, the valence of the taste was represented more quickly after CTA than before. But this more rapid valence representation did not appear until the consolidation phase, despite the fact that aversive behavioral responses to saccharin appeared almost immediately.

These results suggest that after CTA training, changes in the activity of individual gustatory neurons do not occur in a predictable, unidirectional way. Instead, the activity of neurons is continuously adjusted in order to alter the ensemble activity, including the rate of progression between states.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Teresa Esch, Ph.D.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 42 (5)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 42, Issue 5
2 Feb 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 2 February 2022, 42 (5) 719; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.42.5.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 2 February 2022, 42 (5) 719; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.42.5.2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Selective Role for Robo2 in Motor Axon Regeneration
    • How Learning Alters Neurons and Ensembles in Gustatory Cortex
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.