Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Stephani Sutherland
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2023, 43 (14) 2439; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.43.14.2023
Stephani Sutherland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Age-Related Overactive BOLD Signals Not Neuronal in Nature

Lars Stiernman, Filip Grill, Charlotte McNulty, Philip Bahrd, Vania Panes Lundmark, et al.

(see pages 2527–2536)

This week, Stiernman et al. tackle an enduring mystery observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). fMRI uses blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals, and older adults display overactivations relative to younger adults during less demanding tasks. The underpinnings of the anomaly remain unknown. One hypothesis holds that older adults recruit additional neural resources to compensate for age-related deficits, resulting in overactivation relative to younger brains. Here, the authors imaged 23 young adults aged 20–37 years and 34 older adults aged 65–86 years. They simultaneously measured fMRI BOLD signals and positron emission tomography (PET) using a radioligand to see dynamic changes in glucose metabolism reflecting synaptic activity independent from oxygenation and bloodflow. This allowed the researchers to determine whether the overactivations arose from compensatory use of neuronal resources. Participants performed two types of working memory tasks during scanning: a less demanding maintenance task, and a more demanding manipulation task. Young and older participants performed the easier task at similar levels with high accuracy. Younger subjects outperformed older adults on the harder task, but both groups still performed with above 85% accuracy. fMRI and PET activation during working memory (WM) tasks overlapped with increased activity in multiple networks identified as core WM areas similarly in the two age groups. As expected from previous findings, BOLD signals in older adults were more widespread and significantly higher outside core WM areas compared to younger adults. Surprisingly, though, age groups did not differ significantly in their glucose metabolic signals either within or outside core WM areas, suggesting that the overactivity of BOLD signals in older adults was not due to compensatory neuronal activity. Because BOLD signals rely on neurovascular coupling, it may be that age-related changes in cerebral vasculature could affect the hemodynamic response function and thus the overactivations seen in BOLD. Changes in neurotransmitter tone may also underlie the difference. While the new findings excluded neuronal recruitment as the source of the overactivation, the mystery remains unsolved.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Experimental set up in the virtual condition of the between-subject study.

Using Brain Imaging to Understand the Downsides of Video Conferencing

Stephanie Balters, Jonas G. Miller, Rihui Li, Grace Hawthorne, and Allan L. Reiss

(see pages 2568–2578)

Three years ago, at the start of the COVID-19 global pandemic, interpersonal interactions moved online, creating a seismic shift in the way that education, business, health care, and private social gatherings were carried out. Although the pandemic has officially ended and many in-person meetings have resumed, video conferencing continues to play a crucial role in each of these sectors of society. In addition, the possibility of another global pandemic is a very real one that we should consider and plan for now. The upsides of online platforms such as Zoom are undeniable, from the sheer ability to continue endeavors in each sector in any format, to increased access to psychological treatments across state lines and to health care in rural settings, for example. But the downsides are also numerous. People throughout the world experienced the difficulties of tracking a conversation with limited or exaggerated nonverbal cues, the stress of increased self-focused attention, disrupted conversation rhythms due to transmission delays and the unnatural presentation of seeing a grid of faces with increased eye contact – all leading to a phenomenon known as Zoom fatigue. In this week's Journal, Balters et al. investigate the impacts of this technology with multiple measures in 72 individuals (36 dyads) tasked with performing three types of tasks including problem-solving, creative innovation, and socioeconomic tasks, either in real life or over Zoom. The authors imaged brain activity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), which measures cortical oxygenation levels as a proxy for cortical activation. Recently, researchers have extended the use of fNIRS to examine interbrain coherence by “hyperscanning” interacting individuals. Here, the authors performed fNIRS hyperscanning on participants during the tasks, recorded video and audio of the performances to assess behaviors, and used questionnaires to capture subjective experiences. Not surprising to anyone who has been working over Zoom for the past several years, conversation turn-taking was reduced over video compared to in-person interactions. Pairs who took fewer turns switching between speakers reported a lower sense of cooperation and negative feelings about their subjective performance. These pairs also showed less performance on the tasks based on their behavior. Individual brain activity measured with fNIRS did not differ between virtual and in-person conditions, but interbrain coherence did vary in the virtual condition, which was associated with the reduced turn-taking. The data indicate that future technology could benefit from new features that facilitate turn-taking in virtual interaction settings.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Stephani Sutherland

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 43 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 43, Issue 14
5 Apr 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2023, 43 (14) 2439; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.43.14.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2023, 43 (14) 2439; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.43.14.2023
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Age-Related Overactive BOLD Signals Not Neuronal in Nature
    • Using Brain Imaging to Understand the Downsides of Video Conferencing
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.