Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Systems/Circuits

Neural Ensemble Fragmentation in the Anesthetized Drosophila Brain

Michael Troup, Lucy A. L. Tainton-Heap and Bruno van Swinderen
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2023, 43 (14) 2537-2551; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1657-22.2023
Michael Troup
Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy A. L. Tainton-Heap
Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruno van Swinderen
Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Bruno van Swinderen
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Isoflurane anesthesia does not activate sleep-promoting dFB neurons. A, Tethered flies walking on an air-supported ball were exposed to 2% isoflurane. B, Example movement trace from a single fly following exposure to isoflurane. Loss of movement (orange line) was used as the behavioral endpoint of anesthesia. C, Flies expressing GCaMP6s and CsChrimson in dFB neurons (R23E10-Gal4) were imaged using a 2-photon microscope, with ROIs selected for cell bodies, dendrites, and axons (dFB). Scale bar, 50 µm. D, Mean fluorescence change (dF/F) during optogenetic activation (red bar, top) and corresponding fly movement (bottom). n = 6 flies, 3 stimulations each. E, Mean fluorescence activity before (black) and following loss of movement (orange), normalized to peak optogenetic activation (D). n = 6 flies, two-way ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons. F, Flies expressing GCaMP6s and CsChrimson in EB R3m neurons (R28D01-Gal4), with ROIs selected for cell dendrites, axons (EB), and cell bodies. Scale bar, 50 µm. G, Mean fluorescence change (dF/F) during optogenetic activation (red bar, top) and corresponding fly movement (bottom). n = 9 flies, 3 stimulations each. H, Mean fluorescence activity before (black) and following loss of movement (orange), normalized to peak optogenetic activation (G). n = 9 flies, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons. Fly image in A from SciDraw. Fly head in C and F created with BioRender.com.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The effect of isoflurane on whole-brain neural activity and responsiveness. A, Broad-scale volumetric imaging using a nuclear localized GCaMP was performed during 10 min of spontaneous activity, followed by four 2 s UV visual stimuli and four 0.5 s air puff stimuli. B, Example activity heatmap from 200 randomly selected neurons in a single fly. C, Example neuron from B, showing activity over the recording. Green bars represent periods of detected activity (see Materials and Methods). D, Corresponding behavioral activity for the same fly during the spontaneous period. E, Activity heatmap of the same neurons as in B, under isoflurane anesthesia. F, Activity of the same neuron shown in C, under anesthesia. G, The effect of isoflurane (orange) on activity level (number of frames spent active, left), activity number (% cells active, middle), and behavioral responsiveness as measure by responses to an air puff stimulus (right). n = 14 flies. **p < 0.01 (paired t tests). H, Activity heatmap of responses to the UV stimuli for the same fly shown in B-F. I, Average response profile (purple) for all 345 responding neurons across all 4 stimuli for the fly shown in H. Gray represents individual responses. J, Corresponding behavioral activity for the same fly during the stimulation period. In this example, the fly has not moved. K, Activity heatmap of responses to the UV for the same neurons in H, under isoflurane anesthesia. L, Average response profile for the same neurons, under isoflurane. M, Comparison of mean activity levels (left) and the number of UV-responsive neurons (right) during baseline (black) and isoflurane (orange). n = 13 flies. **p < 0.01; paired t test (activity levels) and two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons (neurons responding) (see Materials and Methods). N, Activity heatmap of responses to the air puff stimuli for the same fly shown in spontaneous and UV panels. O, Example average response profile (blue) for all 34 responding neurons across all 4 stimuli. Gray represents individual responses. P, Corresponding behavior during the 4 air puffs. Q, Activity heatmap of responses to the air puff for the same neurons in N, under isoflurane. R, Average response profile (blue) for the same neurons, under isoflurane. Gray represents individual responses. S, Comparison of mean activity levels (left) and the number of air puff-responsive neurons (right) during baseline (black) and isoflurane (orange). n = 14 flies. *p < 0.05, paired t test (activity levels) and two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons (neurons responding) (see Materials and Methods). Color intensity on heatmaps represents z score fluorescence values, where the darkest are values ≥3, and negative values have been zeroed (white) for display.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Neural identity changes under isoflurane anesthesia. A, All UV-responsive cell locations for an example fly during baseline condition. Each dot represents the centroid of the responsive neuron ROI, with the z dimension collapsed. Grayscale background image is a time and z projection of the recording, with minimum and maximum gray values adjusted for clarity. Scale bar, 50 µm. B, All UV-responsive cell locations for the same fly under isoflurane. C, Baseline and isoflurane UV cell locations merged. Green dots represent cells responsive under both conditions. D, Average overlap between baseline and isoflurane conditions for UV-responsive cells for all flies, n = 13. E, All air puff-responsive cell locations for the same fly as A, during baseline condition. F, All air puff-responsive cell locations for the same fly under isoflurane. G, Baseline and isoflurane air puff cell locations merged. In this example, there are no cells in common. H, Average overlap between baseline and isoflurane conditions for air puff-responsive cells for all flies, n = 14. I, Active cell locations for baseline spontaneous condition for the same fly, in a single z slice. J, Active cell locations for isoflurane spontaneous condition, in the same slice. K, Baseline and isoflurane active cells merged. Green dots represent cells active during both conditions. L, Average overlap between baseline and isoflurane conditions for active cells (all slices) for all flies, n = 14.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Neural identity changes through time. A, Active cell identity was compared between all pairwise 1 min periods within the spontaneous recording. B, Example active neurons (black dots) for one fly in a single z slice in 1 min bins. Green represents cells active between two bins. Scale bar, 50 µm. C, Pairwise comparison of cell identity overlap between minute bins during baseline and isoflurane anesthesia. n = 14 flies. D, Mean overlap of bins which share the same distance in time apart (1-9 min) for baseline (black) and isoflurane (orange). n = 14 flies. Shaded region represents SEM. E, Self-similarity as an average measure of pairwise overlap for baseline (black) and isoflurane (orange) spontaneous recording. n = 14 flies. **p < 0.01 (paired t test). F, Pairwise comparison of cell identity overlap between minute bins during baseline and induced sleep. n = 8 flies. G, Mean overlap of bins which share the same distance in time (1-6 min) apart for baseline (black) and sleep (red). n = 8 flies. Shaded region represents SEM. H, Self-similarity as an average measure of pairwise overlap for baseline (black) and sleep (red) spontaneous recording. n = 8 flies, paired t test. ns, not significant.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Decreased neural connectivity under isoflurane anesthesia. A, Neurons were pairwise correlated to find connected partners. The average number of partners per neuron is the mean degree. B, Example neuron (black) with its two connected partners (top) and their corresponding activity traces (middle). Bottom, Two minutes of correlated activity between two of the neurons. Scale bar, 50 µm. C, Pairwise correlations were performed following the shifting of each neuron trace in time by 1-10 frames, which resulted in changes in connectivity. D, Mean degree changes from baseline (black) to isoflurane (orange). n = 14 flies. **p < 0.01 (paired t test). E, Effect of time shifts on mean degree during baseline (black) and isoflurane (orange). Left, The effect of each shift (frames). Right, Comparison of mean degree without shifts to a 10 frame shift. n = 14 flies. ****p < 0.0001 (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons between each frameshift to 0). Shaded region represents SEM. F, Mean degree during baseline (black) and induced sleep (red). n = 8 flies, paired t test. G, Effect of time shifts on mean degree during baseline (black) and sleep (red). Left, The effect of each shift (frames). Right, Comparison of mean degree without shifts to a 10 frame shift. n = 8 flies. ****p < 0.0001 (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons between each frameshift to 0).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Isoflurane anesthesia targets transient neural ensembles across the fly brain. A, Example neurons with their significantly correlated partners which can be close (left) or distant (right). Mean distance is calculated from the distances of all partners. Scale bar, 50 µm. B, Normalized degree and average corresponding distance to correlated partners for each significant neuron in an example fly (right) during baseline (black) and isoflurane (orange). This example is a case where neurons with higher degree tend to be closer together (left) under isoflurane. C, Normalized degree and distance of each neuron in a different fly (right), where the example shows neurons with higher degrees tend to be further apart under isoflurane (left). D, Normalized degree and distance of each neuron in an example fly where distance between connected neurons does not generally change under isoflurane; however, degree decreases. E, The effect of neuron distance (close, medium, and far; see B, right) on connectivity (degree) during baseline wakefulness (black) and during anesthesia (orange). n = 14 flies. **p < 0.01 (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons). F, The effect of degree (low and high; see B, right) on neuron distance. n = 14 flies, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons. G, Connectivity during baseline (black) and anesthesia (orange) in neurons active across both conditions (overlap), and neurons active only within a condition (nonoverlap). n = 14 flies. **p < 0.01 (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons). H, The effect of neuron distance (close, medium, and far) on connectivity (degree) during baseline wakefulness (black) and during sleep (red). n = 8 flies, mixed-effects model with Sidak's multiple comparisons. I, The effect of degree (low and high) on neuron distance. n = 8 flies. *p < 0.05 (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons). J, Connectivity during baseline (black) and sleep (red) in neurons active across both conditions (overlap), and neurons active only within a condition (nonoverlap). n = 8 flies, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Drosophila genetic reagents used in experiments in this study

    ReagentCitationExpression/use
    23E10-Gal4Jenett et al., 2012dFB driver
    28D01-Gal4Jenett et al., 2012R3m EB ring neuron driver
    57C10-Gal4Jenett et al., 2012Pan-neuronal driver
    57C10-LexAJenett et al., 2012Pan-neuronal driver
    UAS-CsChrimsonKlapoetke et al., 2014Optogenetic activation
    UAS-Chrimson88Strother et al., 2017Optogenetic activation
    UAS-GCaMP6sChen et al., 2013Fluorescent calcium indicator, cytosolic expression
    LexAop-nlsGCaMP6fTainton-Heap et al., 2021; provided by Barry J DicksonFluorescent calcium indicator, nuclear localized expression
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 43 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 43, Issue 14
5 Apr 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neural Ensemble Fragmentation in the Anesthetized Drosophila Brain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Neural Ensemble Fragmentation in the Anesthetized Drosophila Brain
Michael Troup, Lucy A. L. Tainton-Heap, Bruno van Swinderen
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2023, 43 (14) 2537-2551; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1657-22.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Neural Ensemble Fragmentation in the Anesthetized Drosophila Brain
Michael Troup, Lucy A. L. Tainton-Heap, Bruno van Swinderen
Journal of Neuroscience 5 April 2023, 43 (14) 2537-2551; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1657-22.2023
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • calcium imaging
  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • general anesthesia
  • isoflurane
  • optogenetics
  • sleep

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Contrast sensitivity of ON and OFF human retinal pathways in myopia
  • Hippocampal engrams generate variable behavioral responses and brain-wide network states
  • Decomposing neural circuit function into information processing primitives
Show more Research Articles

Systems/Circuits

  • Hippocampal engrams generate variable behavioral responses and brain-wide network states
  • Contrast sensitivity of ON and OFF human retinal pathways in myopia
  • Decomposing neural circuit function into information processing primitives
Show more Systems/Circuits
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.