Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Mitofusin 2 Sustains the Axonal Mitochondrial Network to Support Presynaptic Ca2+ Homeostasis and the Synaptic Vesicle Cycle in Rat Hippocampal Axons

Jason D. Vevea and Edwin R. Chapman
Journal of Neuroscience 10 May 2023, 43 (19) 3421-3438; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1356-22.2023
Jason D. Vevea
1Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jason D. Vevea
Edwin R. Chapman
1Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mitochondria exert powerful control over cellular physiology, contributing to ion homeostasis, energy production, and metabolite biosynthesis. The trafficking and function of these organelles are particularly important in neurons, with impaired mitochondrial function or altered morphology observed in every neurodegenerative disorder studied. While mitochondrial biosynthetic products play a crucial role in maintaining cellular function, their resulting byproducts can have negative consequences. Thus, organelle quality control (QC) mechanisms that maintain mitochondrial function are imperative to restrict destructive signaling cascades in the cell. Axons are particularly sensitive to damage, and there is little consensus regarding the mechanisms that mediate mitochondrial QC in this compartment. Here, we first investigated the unstressed behavior of mitochondria in rat hippocampal neurons of mixed sex, focusing on mitochondrial trafficking and fusion to better understand potential QC mechanisms. We observed size and redox asymmetry of mitochondrial traffic in axons, suggesting an active QC mechanism in this compartment. We also document biochemical complementation upon the fusion and fission of axonal mitochondria. Eliminating fusion by knocking down the neuronal mitochondrial fusion protein mitofusin 2 (MFN2) reduced the rates of axonal mitochondrial trafficking and fusion, decreased the levels of synaptic vesicle (SV) proteins, inhibited exocytosis, and impaired SV recruitment from the reserve pool during extended stimulation. MFN2 knockdown also resulted in presynaptic Ca2+ dyshomeostasis. Remarkably, upon MFN2 knockdown, presynaptic mitochondria sequestered Ca2+ more efficiently, effectively limiting presynaptic Ca2+ transients during stimulation. These results support an active mitochondrial trafficking and fusion-related QC process that supports presynaptic Ca2+ handling and the SV cycle.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Decreased or altered mitochondrial function is observed in many disease states. All neurodegenerative diseases co-present with some sort of mitochondrial abnormality. Therefore, identifying quality control mechanisms that sustain the mitochondrial network in neurons, and particularly in axons, is of significant interest. The response of axonal mitochondria to acutely applied toxins or injury has been studied in detail. Although informative, the response of neurons to these insults might not be physiologically relevant, so it is crucial to also study the basal behavior of axonal mitochondria. Here, we use fluorescent biosensors to investigate the mitochondrial network in neurons and examine the role of mitofusin 2 in maintaining the axonal mitochondrial network and in supporting the synaptic vesicle cycle.

  • mitochondria
  • mitochondrial complementation
  • mitofusin 2
  • quality control
  • synaptic vesicle cycle

Introduction

Mitochondria play important roles in numerous cellular functions by supporting energy production (adenosine triphosphate [ATP]), metabolite biosynthesis (lipids, amino acids, nucleotides, heme), ion homeostasis (K+, Ca2+), and the response to cellular stress (Spinelli and Haigis, 2018). Mitochondria exhibit dynamic changes in their structure and appearance, and these differences in shape and form between different types of cells may indicate that they serve specific functions unique to those cells. Indeed, these various mitochondrial morphologies arise from differences in motor activity, expression of organelle anchors, and the balance of mitochondrial fusion to fission (Eisner et al., 2018). Mitochondrial fusion also serves to increase mitochondrial network homogeneity (Youle and van der Bliek, 2012). Specifically, fusion of new, higher-functioning mitochondria with aged or damaged peripheral mitochondria can result in complementation, rejuvenating the less-fit population of these organelles (H. Chen et al., 2005).

Mitochondrial morphology can differ dramatically even within a single cell. For example, neurons broadly consist of three compartments: a soma or cell body that houses the nucleus and an interconnected mitochondrial network, dendrites that are specialized to receive chemical signals and have parallel arrays of interconnected mitochondria, and an axon that maintains synaptic vesicles (SVs) through the SV cycle, with shorter, well-separated mitochondrial units (Lewis et al., 2018; Faitg et al., 2021). Notably, mitochondrial size and connectedness directly correlate with the organelles' Ca2+ buffering capacity (Lewis et al., 2018). So, mitochondria in the axon likely have a lower overall capacity to buffer Ca2+ relative to other neuronal compartments, and the Ca2+ buffering capability of the shorter and less contiguous axonal network of mitochondria may be particularly sensitive to perturbation, resulting in the partial disruption of axonal function (e.g., the SV cycle). Indeed, presynaptic Ca2+ buffering by mitochondria can influence Ca2+ transients, and thus, neurotransmitter release and the SV cycle (Tang and Zucker, 1997; Billups and Forsythe, 2002; Kwon et al., 2016; Vaccaro et al., 2017). The SV cycle is regulated by Ca2+ at many stages. Broadly, the cycle is composed of SV docking, priming, and fusion with the presynaptic membrane, thus releasing neurotransmitters into the synaptic cleft. SV constituents are reinternalized, followed by sorting, and finally SV reformation (Chanaday et al., 2019). How mitochondrial quality control (QC) pathways support mitochondrial Ca2+ buffering capacity in the axon and which steps of the SV cycle are influenced when these pathways are disrupted remain open questions. Understanding these pathways will better inform the mechanistic study of neurodegenerative disorders that show signs of altered mitochondrial morphology or altered presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis.

Here, we first examined axonal mitochondrial morphology, trafficking, and redox status in unstressed neurons by using fluorescent probes and microfluidic devices. We observed mitochondrial trafficking asymmetry with respect to size and redox status, indicating an axonal QC mechanism. We also provide evidence for redox complementation during mitochondrial fusion and content-mixing events in axons. We then evaluated whether axonal mitochondrial fusion is critical for the function of the SV cycle by knocking down the main neuronal mitochondrial outer membrane fusion protein, mitofusin 2 (MFN2) (Eura et al., 2003). We used an SV-targeted pHluorin (vGlut1-pHluorin) (Voglmaier et al., 2006) to monitor the SV cycle and observed decreased exocytosis and a reduction in SV pool mobilization in MFN2 knockdown (KD) neurons. We next examined presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis using: (1) SV-targeted GCaMP6f (SYP-GCaMP6f); (2) a fast far-red Ca2+ sensor, HTL-JF646-BAPTA-AM, (Deo et al., 2019) targeted to SVs by using synaptophysin-HaloTag (SYP-HT) (Bradberry and Chapman, 2022); and (3) a mitochondrial matrix-targeted Ca2+ sensor (mito-GCaMP5G) (Kwon et al., 2016). In MFN2 KD neurons, there was no change in presynaptic Ca2+ influx; however, there was faster clearance of [Ca2+]i that is mediated by an enhanced ability of mitochondria to sequester Ca2+. Together, these optical biosensors revealed that super-physiological mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, originating from MFN2 disruption, may drive axonal Ca2+ alterations to decrease the SV pool, inhibit vesicle pool mobilization, and sensitize mitochondria to Ca2+ overload.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Animal care and use in this study were conducted under guidelines set by the National Institutes of Health's Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals handbook. Protocols were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Wisconsin–Madison (Laboratory Animal Welfare Public Health Service Assurance Number: A3368-01).

Cell culture

Rat (Sprague Dawley) hippocampal and cortical neurons were isolated from E18 pups of both sexes (Envigo) by using a procedure previously described (Vevea and Chapman, 2020). In brief, rat hippocampal neurons were dissected, treated with trypsin (Corning; 25-053-CI), triturated, and plated on glass coverslips (Warner Instruments; 64-0734 [CS-18R17]) previously coated with poly-D-lysine (Fisher Scientific; ICN10269491). Hippocampal neurons were also cultured in standard neuron microfluidic devices (SND450, XONA Microfluidic Devices) mounted on glass coverslips, as previously described (Bomba-Warczak et al., 2016). Neuronal cultures were grown in Neurobasal-A (Fisher Scientific; 10888-022) medium supplemented with B-27 (2%, Fisher Scientific; 17504001), GlutaMAX (2 mm, Invitrogen; 35050061), and penicillin/streptomycin solution (1%, Fisher Scientific; MT30001CI) before experiments. All experiments were performed up to 20 DIVs; 13-16 DIV for microfluidic experiments and 14-20 DIV for pHluorin, Ca2+ (GCaMP#X/JF646-BAPTA-AM), roGFP, and immunoblot experiments. For lentivirus preparation, HEK293T cells (ATCC) were cultured following ATCC guidelines. These cells had been previously tested for mycoplasma contamination by using the Universal Mycoplasma Detection Kit (ATCC; 30-1012K). The HEK293T cells were also validated via short tandem repeat profiling by ATCC (ATCC; 135-XV) (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Key Reagents

Lentivirus production and use

Lentivirus production was performed as described previously (Vevea and Chapman, 2020). When needed, lentiviral constructs were subcloned into the FUGW transfer plasmid (FUGW was a gift from David Baltimore; Addgene plasmid #14883; http://n2t.net/addgene:14883; RRID:Addgene_14883) (Lois et al., 2002). We had previously replaced the ubiquitin promoter with the CAMKII promoter or human synapsin I promoter (Kugler et al., 2003; Vevea and Chapman, 2020). Lentivirus was added to neuronal cultures between 2 and 5 DIV.

Plasmid use and construction

The redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein (pEGFP-N1-mt-ro1GFP) was a gift from S. James Remington (Addgene plasmid #82407; http://n2t.net/addgene:82407; RRID:Addgene_82407). The mitochondrial targeted Ca2+ sensor pCAG mito-GCaMP5G was a gift from Franck Polleux (Addgene plasmid #105009; http://n2t.net/addgene:105009; RRID:Addgene_105009) (Kwon et al., 2016). Silencing constructs encoding control shRNA and mfn2 shRNA (target sequence: TGGATGGACTATGCTAGTGAA) were purchased from Sigma (SHC202 and TRCN0000080612, respectively). The vGLUT1-pHluorin construct (Voglmaier et al., 2006) was subcloned into our previously modified lentivirus backbone of choice derived from FUGW (Vevea and Chapman, 2020). For measuring synaptic Ca2+, the HaloTag cassette from pHTC HaloTag CMV-neo Vector (Promega; G7711) was PCR-amplified and appended to the carboxy terminus of synaptophysin (SYP) with a GS(GSS)4 linker and subcloned into the modified FUGW lentiviral vector. Presynapse-targeted GCaMP6f (SYP-GCaMP6f) was described previously (Bradberry and Chapman, 2022). Mitochondrial matrix-targeted GFP, cytosolic mCherry, and photoactivatable GFP were subcloned into pEF-GFP after excising the GFP (pEF-GFP was a gift from Connie Cepko; Addgene plasmid #11154; http://n2t.net/addgene:11154; RRID:Addgene_11154) (Matsuda and Cepko, 2004). The fluorescent proteins GFP, PA-GFP, and mCherry used here lack the carboxy terminal MDELYK sequence, as this sequence was observed to promote protein aggregation in long-lived cells (Joseph S. Briguglio, unpublished observation).

Live-cell image acquisition

Primary rat hippocampal cultures were transiently transfected with pEF cyto-cmCh and pEF mito-cGFP (matrix) (see Fig. 1A), pEF mito-PAcGFP (see Fig. 1B), pEGFP-N1-mt-ro1GFP referred to hereafter as mito-roGFP (see Fig. 2A–F), or pCAG mito-GCaMP5G (see Fig. 7H–J) at 2-5 DIV using the Ca2+ Phosphate protocol (Jordan and Wurm, 2004). For microfluidic experiments, neurons were transfected or transduced in the soma chamber. Neurons in microfluidic devices were also labeled, with MitoTracker Green FM (MTG, Fisher Scientific) in the soma chamber and MitoTracker Red CMXRos (MTR, Fisher Scientific) in the axon chamber. Microfluidic chambers (soma and axon) were sequentially labeled, being sure to keep unstained chamber pressure high during staining to maintain fluidic isolation. Mass-dissociated neuronal cultures were transduced with vGLUT1-pHluorin, mito-roGFP, SYP-GCaMP6f, mito-GCaMP5G, and KD (control and MFN2) lentiviruses at 2-5 DIV. Neuronal cultures were moved to standard imaging media (i.e., extracellular fluid) consisting of 140 mm NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 2 mm MgCl2, 5.5 mm glucose, 20 mm HEPES, pH 7.3, B-27 (2%, Fisher Scientific), GlutaMAX (2 mM, Invitrogen); loaded into the microscope; and maintained in a humidity-controlled chamber at near-physiological temperature (35°C). Cultures were imaged by using an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope with a 60 × 1.40 NA oil objective using fixed laser intensity and gain settings (see Fig. 1A). Images were also captured on an Olympus IX83 inverted microscope equipped with a cellTIRF 4Line excitation system using an Olympus 60×/1.49 NA Apo N objective and an Orca Flash4.0 CMOS camera (Hamamatsu Photonics) running MetaMorph software that was modified to run concurrently with Olympus 7.8.6.0 acquisition software from Molecular Devices (see Figs. 1B-F, 2–7). Photoactivation experiments were conducted using a single, spot-focused, 405 nm laser on the cellTIRF system. Mitochondrial trafficking experiments were also conducted on the cellTIRF system by using wide-field acquisition mode. Image sequences analyzing mitochondrial motility were acquired with 5 s intervals for a total of 5 min. Field electrical stimulation was triggered by a Grass SD9 stimulator run by Clampex 10.7.0.3 software (Molecular Devices) through a Digidata 1440A digitizer (Molecular Devices) to platinum parallel wires attached to a field-stimulation chamber (Warner Instruments; RC-49MFSH). Stimulator voltage was set to 90 V as this reliably elicited Ca2+ transients at every bouton. For pHluorin and Ca2+ imaging experiments, D AP5 (50 μm) (Abcam; ab120003), CNQX (20 μm) (Abcam; ab120044), and picrotoxin (100 μm) (Tocris Bioscience; 1128) were added to the imaging media to prevent recurrent activity. pHluorin imaging: SV exocytosis was monitored via change in fluorescence of presynaptic punctae from neurons transduced with the vGLUT1-pHluorin lentivirus. Images were acquired at 2 × 2 binning at 1 Hz for up to 2 min. For pHluorin imaging, the focal plane and FOV were found by live focusing during a test stimulation of 40 stimuli at 20 Hz. Neurons were given at least a minute to recover, and the stimulus was repeated during an image acquisition time of 1 min. Next, freshly made 65 nm folimycin (Tocris Bioscience) was added to the imaging well. The macrolide antibiotics bafilomycin and folimycin inhibit the function of vacuolar-type H+-ATPase, preventing pHluorin quenching of recently endocytosed vesicles and allowing a measure of pure exocytosis (Sankaranarayanan and Ryan, 2001; Atasoy et al., 2008). Within a minute of folimycin addition, a 2 min image acquisition was initiated and contained another pulse of 40 stimuli at 20 Hz, with a 30 s break, then a 900 stimuli train at 20 Hz (Burrone et al., 2006). At the end of this imaging sequence, a solution containing 50 mm NH4Cl (replacing 50 mm NaCl in the extracellular fluid) was perfused onto the sample, dequenching all pHluorin (Miesenbock et al., 1998). Ca2+ imaging: Synaptic Ca2+ transients were recorded as synaptic fluorescence change from neurons transduced with synaptophysin-GCaMP6f (SYP-GCaMP6f) (Bradberry and Chapman, 2022) or synaptophysin-HaloTag (SYP-HT) reacted with HTL-JF646-BAPTA-AM (a gift from Dr Luke Lavis, Janelia Research Campus) (Deo et al., 2019). Presynaptic mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake during electrical activity was monitored in axonal mitochondria (axons identified by axon initial segment staining and morphology) targeted with GCaMP5G (Kwon et al., 2016). Images were acquired at 2 × 2 binning at 20 Hz (50 ms exposure) for mito-GCaMP5G and SYP-HT/JF646-BAPTA for up to 20 s. SYP-GCaMP6f was recorded at 100 Hz (10 ms exposure). For SYP-HT/JF646-BAPTA, neurons were field-stimulated with a single stimulus with a break for 2.5 s; then a 50 stimuli train at 50 Hz was given to saturate the indicator. For SYP-GCaMP6f, neurons were field-stimulated with a single stimulus with a break for 0.5 s followed by a 10 stimuli train at 10 Hz. For mito-GCaMP5G, neurons were field-stimulated with a single stimulus with a break for 1.0 s followed by a 40 stimuli train at 20 Hz.

Image quantification

Mitochondrial motility (see Figs. 1 and 2) was analyzed by using Imaris 8.3 (Bitplane). Motile mitochondria were defined as having at least 3 consecutive 15 s displacements during an image series. Mitochondrial redox ratio was calculated by using Fiji (National Institutes of Health) (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described previously (Vevea et al., 2013). The roGFP redox ratio was normalized to the average ratio from the population of mitochondria of each time-series. For roGFP range experiments, roGFP was normalized to initial values (paired recordings H2O2/DTT) or to CTRL (rotenone/antimycin A [AA]). Mitochondrial trafficking and fusion in axons were quantified by using the Just Another Colocalization Plugin (Bolte and Cordelieres, 2006) for Fiji (see Figs. 3B–D, 4E–I). The pHluorin analysis was done by selecting responding ROIs in Fiji and measuring the fluorescence intensity change over time. These data were copied and imported into AxoGraph X 1.7.2 (AxoGraph Scientific), where traces were baseline-subtracted and normalized to pHluorin's peak fluorescence intensity during NH4Cl perfusion via the formula (F – F0)/(Fmax – F0). These traces were then analyzed in AxoGraph for endocytic τ (pHluorin signal decay after stimulus without folimycin), peak changes in fluorescence (exocytosis, with and without folimycin), and average fluorescence after 900 action potential (AP) stimuli train but before NH4Cl application, which represents the total SV reserve pool (with folimycin). Ca2+ image quantitation was handled similarly to pHluorin analysis. Responding ROIs were identified, and fluorescence intensity was measured over time by using Fiji.

For SYP-GCaMP6f and mito-GCaMP5G imaging, the change in fluorescence over the initial fluorescence was calculated in AxoGraph, using the 0.5 s baseline as the initial fluorescence. This ΔF/F0 is a relative readout of compartment Ca2+ changes. For the HTL-JF646-BAPTA indicator, traces were baseline-subtracted and normalized to signal during the 50 AP train by calculating (F – F0)/(Fmax – F0) in AxoGraph. The decays of [Ca2+]i following the indicated stimulus are reported as τ values. The fluorescence decays after 1 AP were well fitted to a single-component exponential, and the decays after the train were well fitted to a two-component exponential. Absolute [Ca2+]i was quantitated as described previously (Bradberry and Chapman, 2022). Briefly, the sensor was saturated (Fmax) with intense stimuli (Maravall et al., 2000), and published reports of Kd (140 nm), Rf (5.5), and Hill coefficient (n) (1) (Deo et al., 2019) were used to approximate [Ca2+]i according to equations derived previously (de Juan-Sanz et al., 2017; Maravall et al., 2000). The following equation was used to calculate [Ca2+]i in the presynapse: [Ca2+]i=KdFFmax-1Rf1-FFmax1/n where [Ca2+]i represents internal calcium concentration, F is resting fluorescence, Fmax is maximal fluorescence during indicator saturation, Rf is dynamic range, Kd is the dissociation constant, and n is the Hill coefficient. All measurements were summarized in Excel (Microsoft) and imported into GraphPad Prism 9.3.1 (GraphPad Software) for statistical analysis and graph production.

Immunoblot protocol

Immunoblots were performed as described previously (Vevea and Chapman, 2020) but were imaged on a ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad, 17001402). Primary and secondary antibodies are listed in the key resource table along with identifiers and dilutions used.

Chemicals

Chemicals are listed in the key resource table. All chemicals were resuspended and stored per manufacturer guidelines. Folimycin was ordered before use, stored dry at −20°C in original packaging, and resuspended the week of the experiments. Aliquots were frozen at −20°C and used within a week after resuspension.

Statistics

Exact values from experiments and analysis, including the number of data points (n) and trials (i.e., biological replicates) for each experiment, are listed in the figure legends. GraphPad Prism 9.3.1 (GraphPad Software) was used for statistical analysis. When appropriate, data are displayed as Tukey box and whisker plots. Most data were not normally distributed, so nonparametric tests (i.e., Mann–Whitney U tests) were used throughout. No a priori power analysis was completed before experimentation; however, to estimate sample size, a nomogram for sample size, effect size, and power was consulted (Serdar et al., 2021). For our experimental planning, we generally prefer power = 0.8 and confidence = 0.05. Then, we estimate the standardized difference to arrive at a rough sample size result. For initial mitochondrial size and trafficking parameters (see Fig. 1), we wanted to ensure we uncovered a small to medium effect size, so we chose a standardized difference of ∼0.4. This results in a required sample size of ∼150-200. Finding a medium to large difference in these experiments, we adjusted our calculation and lowered our subsequent sample size for the experiments shown in Figure 2. For sample size calculation in microfluidic experiments summarized in Figure 4, we relied on the results from Figure 3. For biosensor experiments (see Figs. 5–7), we chose a standardized difference = 1, representing a large difference expectation, and resulting in an estimated sample size of ∼30. For presynaptic biosensor image analysis, many boutons were imaged. The n that was quantified was (1) randomly selected for analysis and was checked only for a lack of x, y, and z drift during imaging; and (2) evenly dispersed between different image sets and biological replicates.

Results

Asymmetric trafficking of mitochondria in axons

The existence of axonal QC mechanisms regulating the asymmetric traffic of mitochondria remains the subject of debate. In unstressed axons, there is evidence both for (Miller and Sheetz, 2004; Mandal et al., 2021) and against (Verburg and Hollenbeck, 2008; Suzuki et al., 2018) mitochondrial trafficking asymmetry. There may not be a need for a trafficking QC mechanism in axons if mitochondrial biogenesis (Amiri and Hollenbeck, 2008; Kuzniewska et al., 2020) and degradation (mitophagy) (Ashrafi et al., 2014) occur locally. However, local biogenesis appears limited, and axonal mitophagy seems to occur only during extreme (likely nonphysiological) stress. Importantly, increased mitochondrial retrograde traffic has been reported with application of low (nm) concentrations of mitochondrial toxins (Cai et al., 2012; M. Y. Lin et al., 2017) or, in specific disease models (Ebrahimi-Fakhari et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2019). We also note that several mitochondrial proteins are exceptionally long-lived (Bomba-Warczak et al., 2021), arguing against whole organelle degradation, and mitophagy might be completely dispensable for mitochondrial homeostasis in axons (T. H. Lin et al., 2021). The phenomenon of mitochondrial trafficking asymmetry appears to be evolutionarily conserved, as yeast (McFaline-Figueroa et al., 2011; Higuchi et al., 2013) and stem cells (Katajisto et al., 2015) can segregate low- from high-functioning mitochondria via a QC mechanism that is critical for replicative lifespan or maintaining stemness. Trafficking mitochondria in axons is expected to be important for axonal function and neuronal health because altered mitodynamics are found in many, if not all, neurodegenerative diseases and disease models examined, as well as for sporadic cases (H. Chen and Chan, 2009; Schon and Przedborski, 2011; but see also Area-Gomez et al., 2019).

Here, we used dissociated rat hippocampal neurons to study axonal mitochondrial morphology and trafficking parameters. Before focusing on axonal mitochondria, we first corroborated morphologic differences among mitochondria in the soma, dendrite (postsynaptic), and axonal (presynaptic) compartments (Fig. 1A) (Lewis et al., 2018; Faitg et al., 2021). Dendrites have spines and a large tapering shaft diameter; axons are smooth, do not taper, and have a smaller diameter (Craig and Banker, 1994). Clear dendritic (right neurite) and axonal (left neurite) morphologic characteristics are revealed by the cytosolic mCherry signal (Fig. 1A, magenta box). Using mitochondrial targeted green fluorescent protein (mito-cGFP) (Fig. 1A, green box), we confirmed that mitochondria in dendrites are long and overlapping, but axonal mitochondria are shorter and evenly spaced apart (Lewis et al., 2018; Faitg et al., 2021). We then examined trafficking using mitochondrial-targeted photo-activatable GFP (PA-GFP) (Patterson and Lippincott-Schwartz, 2002). Photo-activation of the soma allowed us to monitor new mitochondrial trafficking events to neurites (Fig. 1B). Mitochondria that entered the axon were small and unitary and showed processive movement throughout the image series (30 min). In contrast, mitochondria entered dendrites slowly and did not traffic far, appearing to immediately fuse with the dendritic mitochondrial network, similar to previous observations (Overly et al., 1996). To further examine mitochondrial trafficking in the axon, we cultured primary neurons in microfluidic devices that separate axons from dendrites and cell bodies (Fig. 1C; Movie 1). Microfluidic isolation enabled axon versus somato-dendritic mitochondria counterstaining using different MitoTracker dyes. We then imaged axons in the middle of the 450 μm microfluidic channel to monitor retrograde (defined as MTR+) and anterograde (defined as MTG+) events. We found that anterograde-trafficked mitochondria were longer (Fig. 1D) and more processive (Fig. 1E) than retrograde-trafficked mitochondria; moreover, the average speed of anterograde mitochondria was greater (Fig. 1F). Together, these data establish the existence of mitochondrial trafficking asymmetry in axons, which may be related to an organelle QC mechanism.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Asymmetric trafficking of mitochondria in axons. A, Maximum projection of a live-cell, confocal z stack from a 16 DIV neuron cotransfected with cytosolic mCherry and mitochondrial matrix-targeted, monomeric-superfolder green fluorescent protein (msGFP). Scale bar, 25 µm. Magenta and green boxes outline zoomed-in areas on the right, highlighting the distinct morphologies of axonal and dendritic mitochondria. B, Temporal color-coded maximum projection of a 15 DIV neuron expressing mitochondrial matrix-targeted, photo-activatable GFP (PA-GFP). Mitochondrial soma egress was monitored after photoactivation by imaging every minute for 30 total minutes. Scale bar, 25 µm. C, Representative images of 14 DIV neurons, grown in SND450 (Xona) microfluidic devices, stained with MTG and MTR CMXRos on the soma and axon sides, respectively. Scale bar, 50 µm. Yellow square represents the area enlarged on the right, showing delineated mitochondrial trafficking events at the indicated time points. Scale bar, 5 µm. Mitochondria imaged in this area have traveled at least 200 µm, as the microchannels in the microfluidic device are 450 µm long. D, Mitochondria were segregated into anterograde (black) or retrograde (red) groups based on MitoTracker dye labeling (green vs red) and direction of motility in the microchannel (see also Materials and Methods). Mitochondrial lengths are quantified from the middle of the microchannel: anterograde = 2.07 µm [1.88-2.15] and retrograde = 1.53 µm [1.46-1.62]. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann-Whitney U test = 6152, n1 = 165, n2 = 160, p < 0.0001. E, Track lengths (processive movement or un-paused motility); anterograde (black) = 9.64 µm [7.82-12.35] and retrograde (red) = 5.67 µm [4.64-6.06], segregated as in D. Pauses were defined as three consecutive images (15 s each) where the organelle did not move. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 7401, n1 = 165, n2 = 160, p < 0.0001. F, Average track speed values (track distance over time) plotted by anterograde (black) or retrograde (red) direction, segregated as in D; anterograde (0.34 µm/s [0.30-0.39]) and retrograde (0.28 µm/s [0.24-0.31]) mitochondrial trafficking speeds are plotted. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 11044, n1 = 165, n2 = 160, p = 0.0109. D–F, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots. Data were gathered from at least three independent experiments; each n indicates an individual anterograde- or retrograde-trafficking mitochondrion.

Movie 1.

Asymmetric trafficking of mitochondria in axons. Example image sequence of background-subtracted MTG+ and MTR+ axonal mitochondria trafficking through the microchannel of a 450-µm-long microfluidic. The image sequence is an example from data collected for Figure 1C. Intervals between frames are 5 s each. Scale bar, 5 µm.

Anterograde-trafficked mitochondria are more reduced and complement resident axonal mitochondria

We next examined the redox status of axonal mitochondria using microfluidic devices and mitochondrial-targeted redox-sensitive GFP (mito-roGFP). Mito-roGFP equilibrates with the mitochondrial matrix thiol/disulfide redox system and is an indirect reporter of any changes in reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Dooley et al., 2004; Hanson et al., 2004). The relative redox status of the mitochondrial matrix is used as a proxy for fitness of the organelle, with a more reduced ratio indicating better fitness (McFaline-Figueroa et al., 2011). Relatively high mitochondrial ROS is a marker for organelle dysfunction, as high amounts of ROS are created as a byproduct of a disrupted electron transport chain and can further exacerbate mitochondrial damage and organelle dysfunction (Balaban et al., 2005). ROS is so well regarded as a marker for mitochondrial fitness that many studies are centered around observing the behavior of axonal mitochondria when exposed to mitochondrial toxins that increase these species. Specifically, these studies analyzed mitochondrial morphology, trafficking, and function in axons after application of high, moderate, or low doses of mitochondrial specific toxins that target either the mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) or components of the electron transport chain.

High doses of AA (>40 μm), a complex III inhibitor, either arrested mitochondrial transport (Wang et al., 2011) and induced axonal mitophagy (Ashrafi et al., 2014), or increased axonal retrograde flux of mitochondria (Miller and Sheetz, 2004). A high dose of paraquat (20 mm) specifically inhibits mitochondrial traffic in the axon, dependent on ROS (Liao et al., 2017). A moderate dose of carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (10 μm), a Δψm dissipating reagent, increased axonal retrograde traffic to the soma (Cai et al., 2012); yet, a high dose (1 mm) did not affect the retrograde flux of mitochondria (Miller and Sheetz, 2004). Low doses of AA (<10 nm) increased retrograde mitochondrial transport (M. Y. Lin et al., 2017) or had no effect on motility but induced mitophagy in the soma (Evans and Holzbaur, 2020). During basal or unstressed conditions, anterograde- and retrograde-trafficked mitochondria are reported to correlate strongly (Miller and Sheetz, 2004) or not at all (Verburg and Hollenbeck, 2008) with Δψm, or ATP levels (Suzuki et al., 2018); however, inhibition of retrograde axonal traffic increased the number of damaged mitochondria in axons (Mandal et al., 2021).

Here, we limited our study of axonal mitochondria to basal or unstressed conditions. We looked for evidence that axons can sort mitochondria based on their redox status. To do this, we transfected mito-roGFP into neurons growing in microfluidic devices and imaged the axon chamber just above (in the figure) the microchannel for 5 min periods (Fig. 2A, magenta box). Anterograde- and retrograde-trafficking mitochondria were identified based on persistent motility in relation to the microfluidic microchannel, and their lengths and relative redox ratios were quantified. Because axon mitochondrial traffic asymmetry has been controversial, we again measured mitochondrial length, and again found anterograde mitochondria to be longer (Fig. 2B). The difference here is significant but slightly less so than in Figure 1D, possibly because this experiment does not contain a counter stain to unambiguously distinguish somato-dendritic–derived anterograde mitochondria from retrograde mitochondria. Additionally, we found that anterograde-trafficking mitochondria had a more reduced mitochondrial matrix than either stationary- (ratios are normalized to stationary mitochondria) or retrograde-trafficking mitochondria did (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Anterogradely trafficked mitochondria are more reduced and complement resident axonal mitochondria. A, Representative images of neurons grown in SND450 (Xona) microfluidic devices and transfected with mitochondrial matrix-targeted redox-sensitive GFP (roGFP). B, C, F, Data analysis was limited to FOVs on the axon side near microchannels, denoted by the magenta rectangle. Scale bar, 50 µm. B, As in Figure 1D, we compared the length of anterograde-trafficked mitochondria (black) to that of retrograde-trafficked mitochondria (red). Anterograde-trafficked mitochondria were again longer than retrograde-trafficked mitochondria, with lengths for anterograde mitochondria of 1.84 µm [1.63-2.27] and retrograde mitochondria, 1.52 µm [1.19-1.95]. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 1024, n1 = 54, n2 = 53, p = 0.0108. B, C, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots with data from at least three independent experiments; each n indicates an individual anterograde- or retrograde-trafficking mitochondrion. C, The redox ratio was calculated for anterograde- (black) or retrograde- (red) trafficking mitochondria as described in Materials and Methods, then normalized to the average redox ratio of the population of mitochondria in the FOV. The redox ratio values were 0.96 [0.94-0.97] (oxidized to reduced) for anterograde and 1.04 [1.02-1.06] (oxidized to reduced) for retrograde. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 454, n1 = 54, n2 = 53, p < 0.0001. D, Quantitation of mito-roGFP dynamic range after 30 min exposure to control (PBS), oxidizing (5 mM H2O2), or reducing (5 mM DTT) treatment. Redox ratios are from paired measurements and normalized to control (CTRL) values. The redox ratios were 0.98 [0.96-1.01] (oxidized to reduced) for CTRL (black), 1.18 [1.13-1.18] (oxidized to reduced) for H2O2 (teal), and 0.60 [0.59-0.74] (oxidized to reduced) for DTT (azure). Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Kruskal–Wallis test H = 53.21, n1 = 21, n2 = 21, n3 = 21, p < 0.0001. Follow-up of multiple comparisons by applying Dunn's correction resulted in the following p values: CTRL versus H2O2, p = 0.0009; CTRL versus DTT, p = 0.0007; and H2O2 versus DTT, p < 0.0001. D, E, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots from three independent experiments; each n indicates the soma and dendritic arbor of an individual neuron from a mass-dissociated culture after sparse transduction with mito-roGFP lentivirus. E, Quantitation of the mito-roGFP dynamic range after 24 h of complete inhibition of electron transport chain by the complex I inhibitor rotenone (1 µm ROT) and the complex III inhibitor antimycin A (1 µm AA). Redox ratios are normalized to control (DMSO/vehicle, CTRL) values at the 24 h time point. The redox ratios were 1.00 [0.95-1.05] (oxidized to reduced) for CTRL (black), 1.33 [1.29-1.51] (oxidized to reduced) for rotenone (violet), and 1.36 [1.26-1.43] (oxidized to reduced) for antimycin A (lilac). Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Kruskal–Wallis test H = 38.96, n1 = 28, n2 = 31, n3 = 37, p < 0.0001. Follow-up multiple comparisons using Dunn's correction resulted in the following p values: CTRL versus ROT, p < 0.0001; CTRL versus AA, p < 0.0001. F, Representative images from an image series of axonal mito-roGFP. Low redox ratio mitochondria (a) can be seen moving in the anterograde direction toward stationary mitochondria (b). These mitochondria fuse and the redox ratio equilibrates as the now single mitochondrion (ab) continues in the anterograde direction. After a short distance, it divides and a small piece, approximately the size of the original (b) mitochondrion, is left in a new position (b'). The rest of the mitochondrion (a') continues in the anterograde direction. A table of size and redox ratio values is listed next to the images. White scale bar, 5 µm. Fire LUT scale bar, intensity: white represents highest ratio; purple represents lowest ratio.

When using fluorescent biosensors, it is important to be sure the experimental recordings fall within the dynamic range of the chosen indicator. To address this, we demonstrate the range of mito-roGFP in our experiments with 30 min applications of oxidant (5 mm H2O2) or reductant (5 mm DTT) (Fig. 2D). These experiments show that the mito-roGFP probe functions within its dynamic range during the experiments shown in Figure 2C. We also inhibited the electron transport chain with mitochondrial toxins, which increase mitochondrial ROS, using rotenone and antimycin A, which are complex I and III inhibitors, respectively. After 24 h, we recorded an ∼30% increase in the mito-roGFP ratio, representing a mitochondrial matrix that was apparently more oxidized than one receiving a 30 min treatment with H2O2 (Fig. 2E).

During these time-lapse experiments from Figure 2A–C, we identified several mitochondrial fusion events. In Figure 2F and Movie 2, we show a representative example of an anterograde-trafficking mitochondria fusing with a stationary axonal mitochondrion with a more-oxidized status. The fused mitochondrion moved a small distance, the redox ratio equilibrated, and then the mitochondrion divided again, resulting in two mitochondria with relatively reduced mitochondrial matrix. Redox ratio values and mitochondrial area are included in the table to the right of the image frames. These fusion events prompted us to reexamine mitochondrial axonal trafficking using MitoTracker dyes and microfluidic devices in the following series of experiments.

Movie 2.

Anterograde mitochondria are more reduced and complement resident axonal mitochondria. Example time-series from the axon chamber of a microfluidic device showing mitochondria expressing roGFP. The image sequence is the background-subtracted ratio of both emissions from roGFP. This is the full movie from Figure 2F, which shows select images. Fire LUT represents reduced (purple) or oxidized (white) signal. Intervals between frames are 5 s each. Scale bar, 5 µm.

Robust anterograde axonal mitochondrial trafficking complements the resident axonal mitochondrial network

We monitored the rate of anterograde-trafficked mitochondria and the rate of axonal mitochondrial fusion by labeling neurons grown in a microfluidic device as in Figure 1 (Fig. 3A; Movie 3). After labeling, we monitored the rate of newly trafficked mitochondria into the axon chamber every hour for 4 h by imaging at the cyan box shown in Figure 3A. Somato-dendritic mitochondria (MTG+) trafficked into the axon chamber at a rate of ∼4% of the total mitochondrial signal (MTR+ plus MTG+ mitochondria) per hour (Fig. 3B). Approximately half (40%-60%) of these newly trafficked mitochondria fused with resident axonal mitochondria (Fig. 3C). We also addressed the rate at which resident axonal mitochondria are complemented and found that they fuse (colocalize) with newly trafficked mitochondria (MTG+) at a rate of ∼2% per hour (Fig. 3D). This value is the complementation rate. These results demonstrate vigorous anterograde axonal mitochondrial traffic (4% of total axonal mitochondrial mass per hour), which serves to complement the resident mitochondrial network in the form of fusion (∼50% fusion rate). Next, we sought to disrupt this process and measure presynaptic function.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Robust anterograde axonal mitochondrial trafficking complements the resident axonal mitochondrial network. A, Representative image (left) of neurons grown (13-16 DIV) in a microfluidic device as in Figure 1C. B–D, Data analysis was limited to FOVs on the axon side near microchannels, denoted with the cyan rectangle. Scale bars: left, 50 µm; enlarged areas, 5 µm. The enlarged area bound by the cyan square shows representative images of 1 and 4 h after MitoTracker labeling, displaying somato-dendritic mitochondrial traffic into axons (MTG) and fusion with resident axonal mitochondria (MTR). B, A measure of newly trafficked axonal mitochondria, defined by MTG signal as a percentage of total fluorescent signal (MTG/(MTR + MTG)) at hour intervals after MitoTracker labeling. Newly trafficked mitochondria account for 4.59% [3.8%-10.72%] of total mitochondria at 1 h, 8.28% [6.25%-12.4%] at 2 h, 12.9% [9.13%-21.91%] at 3 h, and 14.71% [11.19%-19.32%] at 4 h. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error. C, A measure of the fraction of new mitochondria (visualized with MTG) that fuse with resident axonal mitochondria, defined as the percentage of MTG signal that colocalized with MTR signal. The fraction of newly trafficked mitochondria that undergo fusion is 43.9% [35.8%-61.9%] of new mitochondria at 1 h, 58.2% [42.9%-63.4%] at 2 h, 61.2% [48.7%-68.4%] at 3 h, and 62.9% [56.6%-68.7%] at 4 h. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error. D, Fraction of resident axonal mitochondria (visualized with MTR) that fuse with newly trafficked mitochondria, defined as the percentage of MTR that colocalized with MTG. These values are as follows: 1.95% [1.5%-7.7%] of new mitochondria at 1 h, 3.8% [3.1%-8.2%] at 2 h, 8% [5.8%-21.7%] at 3 h, and 10.2% [6.4%-15.7%] at 4 h. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error. B–D, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots with n = 5 for time 0 h and n > 15 for each other group; data are from at least three independent experiments. Each n indicates an FOV from the axon chamber.

Movie 3.

Robust anterograde axonal mitochondrial trafficking complements the resident axonal mitochondrial network. Example image sequence of background-subtracted MTG+ and MTR+ axonal mitochondria trafficking in the axonal chamber 2 h after MitoTracker labeling. The image sequence is an example from data collected for Figure 3A. Intervals between frames are 5 s each. Scale bar, 5 µm.

MFN2 supports mitochondria morphology, anterograde trafficking, and mitochondrial complementation in axons

Mitochondrial fusion in vertebrates is mediated by the large outer membrane-bound GTPases mitofusin 1 (MFN1) and MFN2 (H. Chen et al., 2003). We disrupted mitochondrial fusion in neurons using a lentiviral-transduced shRNA to knock down the main neuronal mitofusin isoform, MFN2 (Eura et al., 2003). We achieved stable and consistent MFN2 KD to ∼20% that of control conditions (Fig. 4A,B). In the soma of MFN2 KD neurons, mitochondria appeared swollen and less tubular than control KD cells (CTRL KD, scrambled shRNA) (Fig. 4C). We then used microfluidic devices to label the soma side with MTG and the axon side with MTR as described in Figure 1, but this time we compared axonal mitochondrial traffic and fusion between CTRL KD and MFN2 KD neurons. As before, FOVs were collected on the axon side near the microchannel opening, indicated by the cyan box (Fig. 4D); enlarged ROIs showing representative CTRL KD and MFN2 KD axonal mitochondria are shown to the right. We first compared shape descriptors, finding that axonal mitochondria from MFN2 KD microfluidic devices were smaller (Fig. 4E) and shorter (Fig. 4F) than those from CTRL KD cells, as measured by individual mitochondrial area (µm2) and aspect ratio (major axis/minor axis), respectively. Next, we examined mitochondrial trafficking and fusion in axons, as described in Figure 3B–D, at a 4 h time point. For CTRL KD cells, the values of newly trafficked axonal mitochondria as a percentage of total mitochondria (Fig. 4G), the fraction of newly trafficked mitochondria undergoing fusion (Fig. 4H), and the fraction of resident mitochondria undergoing fusion in the axon at the 4 h time point (Fig. 4I) are comparable to values quantified for Figure 3, which depicts untransduced cells. As expected, untransduced control neurons and transduced CTRL KD neurons in microfluidic devices are comparable, further documenting that the methodology and measurements of mitochondria are robust and reproducible. Comparing the above parameters for CTRL KD and MFN2 KD axonal mitochondria, we observed decreased anterograde mitochondrial traffic (new axonal mitochondria identified by MTG) (Fig. 4G), an increased rate of mitochondrial fusion of newly trafficked mitochondria (Fig. 4H), but an overall decrease in total axonal mitochondrial fusion in MFN2 KD axons (Fig. 4I). We also assayed neuronal mitochondrial redox ratios, comparing CTRL KD to MFN2 KD cells, and found that MFN2 KD neurons had a slightly more oxidized mitochondrial matrix (elevated ∼5%) (Fig. 4J).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

MFN2 supports mitochondria morphology, anterograde trafficking, and mitochondrial complementation in axons. A, Representative anti-MFN2 immunoblot from rat 15 DIV hippocampal neurons with trichloroethanol as a loading control. Conditions from left to right: blank, no protein; control, no lentivirus application; control, nontargeting shRNA lentivirus (CTRL KD); experiment, treated with MFN2-targeted shRNA (see Materials and Methods) (MFN2 KD). B, A Tukey box and whisker plot of MFN2 KD efficiency quantitated by immunoblot densitometry from seven independent dissociated neuronal samples. Median MFN KD (red) percentage is 21.45% [95% CI: 15.6%-32.7%]; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.0156. C, Representative Airyscan images of single focal planes through the soma and proximal dendrites of neurons transduced with mitochondrial-matrix-targeted msGFP, and CTRL or MFN2 KD lentivirus constructs. Mitochondrial aggregation and loss of tubular network, characteristic of loss of MFN2 function, is visible in the MFN2 KD-treated neurons. Scale bar, 5 µm. D, Representative image (left) of neurons grown (13-16 DIV) in a microfluidic device as in Figures 1C and 3A. E–I, Data analysis was limited to the FOV on the axon side near microchannels, denoted with the cyan rectangle. Scale bars: left, 50 µm; enlarged areas, 5 µm. The enlarged area bound by the cyan square shows representative images of microfluidic devices from CTRL KD and MFN2 KD 14-16 DIV, after MitoTracker labeling, displaying somato-dendritic mitochondrial traffic into axons (MTG) and resident axonal mitochondria (MTR). E, Quantitation of the average size of resident axonal mitochondria (MTR+) between the CTRL KD and MFN2 KD microfluidic devices. CTRL KD resident axonal mitochondria were larger (0.39 µm2 [0.37-0.42]) than axonal mitochondria from MFN2 KD microfluidic devices (0.33 µm2 [0.32-0.36]). Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 95.5, n1 = 23, n2 = 23, p < 0.0001. E, F, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots from three independent experiments; each n indicates an FOV from the axon chamber. F, Quantitation of the average aspect ratio (major axis/minor axis) of resident axonal mitochondria (MTR+) between the CTRL KD and MFN2 KD microfluidic devices. CTRL KD resident axonal mitochondria were longer (2.42 a.u. [2.37-2.54]) than axonal mitochondria from MFN2 KD microfluidic devices (2.30 a.u. [2.20-2.40]). Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 163.5, n1 = 23, n2 = 23, p = 0.0258. G, As in Figure 3B, a measure of newly trafficked axonal mitochondria at 4 h after MitoTracker labeling, comparing CTRL KD and MFN2 KD. At 4 h, newly trafficked mitochondria account for 17.2% [14.60%-22.80%] of total mitochondria in CTRL KD microfluidic devices, and newly trafficked mitochondria account for 9.6% [7.70%-11.00%] of total mitochondria in MFN2 KD microfluidic devices. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 43.5, n1 = 23, n2 = 20, p < 0.0001. G–I, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots, with each n indicating an FOV from the axon chamber. H, As in Figure 3C, a measure of the fraction of newly trafficked mitochondria that fuse with resident axonal mitochondria. In CTRL KD microfluidic devices, 54.1% [40.30%-61.70%] of newly trafficked mitochondria fuse with resident axonal mitochondria at 4 h; in MFN2 KD microfluidic devices, 63.7% [55.10%-66.30%] do. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 131.5, n1 = 23, n2 = 20, p = 0.0156. I, As in Figure 3D, this is a measure of resident axonal mitochondria complementation. In CTRL KD microfluidic devices, 11.2% [7.50%-17.20%] of resident axonal mitochondria fuse with newly trafficked axonal mitochondria at 4 h; in MFN2 KD microfluidic devices, 8.0% [3.03%-9.40%] do. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 132.5, n1 = 23, n2 = 20, p = 0.0167. J, The redox ratio was calculated for CTRL KD (black) or MFN2 KD (red) conditions as described in Materials and Methods, then normalized to the average redox ratio of the CTRL KD population of neurons. The normalized redox ratio values were 1.00 [0.95-1.05] (oxidized to reduced) for CTRL KD and 1.05 [1.03-1.11] (oxidized to reduced) for MFN2 KD conditions. Values are medians with 95% CI, representing error; Mann–Whitney U test = 303.5, n1 = 31, n2 = 29, p = 0.0302.

MFN2 influences mitochondrial trafficking in zebrafish axons (Chapman et al., 2013), as well as in the axons of rodent dorsal root ganglion (DRG) sensory neurons (Misko et al., 2010) and human embryonic stem cell-derived spinal motor neurons (Mou et al., 2021). Here, in primary rodent hippocampal axons, we observed decreased anterograde mitochondrial traffic and an overall decreased amount of mitochondrial fusion to resident axonal mitochondria. Surprisingly, the limited number of mitochondria that successfully trafficked into the axon chamber appeared to exhibit no defects in fusion. Indeed, we document a slight increase in fusion rate relative to CTRL KD conditions. This may be a sign of early QC during mitochondria soma egress; neurons may select for fusogenic mitochondria. In our MFN2 KD conditions, this would appear as an overall decrease in mitochondrial anterograde traffic followed by a normal fusion rate for newly trafficked axonal mitochondria, which is what we observed.

MFN2 supports the SV cycle

We next determined whether loss of mitochondrial fusion influences the SV cycle using an SV-targeted super-ecliptic pHluorin (vGlut1-pHluorin) (Voglmaier et al., 2006) as a read-out for exocytosis and endocytosis. The phluorin tag is a pH-sensitive GFP mutant with a pKa of ∼7.1 (Sankaranarayanan et al., 2000). Upon SV exocytosis, pHluorin dequenches (i.e., the fluorescence increases); then, on endocytosis and reacidification, it requenches (i.e., the fluorescence decreases). We investigated the SV cycle by monitoring the fluorescence changes from vGlut1-pHluorin in CTRL and MFN KD neurons; an illustration of the vGlut1-pHluorin response upon SV exocytosis is shown in Figure 5A. We measured the rate of endocytosis and the size of the readily releasable pool (RRP), reserve pool (RP), and total SV pool using established protocols (Li et al., 2005). Briefly, 40 APs drive the release of the RRP, and 900 APs drive the release of the RP. Endocytosis occurs during exocytosis; therefore, to accurately measure exocytosis, a V-ATPase inhibitor (e.g., folimycin) is required to inhibit SV reacidification. Finally, bath application of NH4Cl was used to dequench all vGlut1-pHluorin, and this value was used to normalize the pHluorin signals at each synapse. The average traces for RRP and RP depleting stimuli are shown in Figure 5B. First, we found that the rate of endocytosis (τ) was faster at MFN2 KD synapses than at CTRL KD synapses (Fig. 5C). The NH4Cl normalized (total SV pool normalization) RRP with folimycin (Fig. 5D) was unchanged between CTRL KD and MFN2 KD synapses; however, the non-normalized RRP from MFN2 KD neurons was significantly lower (Fig. 5E). Indeed, the NH4Cl normalized reserve pool fraction was also smaller (Fig. 5F), as was the total fluorescence during bath application of NH4Cl (Fig. 5G), suggesting a major reduction in the size of the total SV pool in MFN2 KD neurons.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

MFN2 supports the SV cycle. A, Schematic of SV-targeted pHluorin during exocytosis. B, Average (± 95% CI) traces of vGlut1-pHluorin fluorescence intensity during the SV cycle from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) neurons. Neurons were stimulated with 40 APs at 20 Hz to drive the release of the RRP and then allowed to recover. During recovery, the fluorescence decay represents endocytosis and vesicle reacidification. After recovery, folimycin was added to prevent vesicle reacidification (pHluorin quenching), enabling the measurement of pure exocytosis. Forty APs were used again to drive the release of the RRP; the neurons were then maximally stimulated with 900 AP at 20 Hz to trigger exocytosis of the entire RP of vesicles. After stimulation, NH4Cl was perfused onto the sample to unquench all synaptic pHluorin signal and measure the total vGlut1-pHluorin signal. Traces normalized to maximum NH4Cl signal ((F – F0)/(Fmax – F0)); n > 45 separate boutons from three independent experiments. C, Rate of endocytosis (τ) determined from the vGlut1-pHluorin fluorescence decay after 40 AP stimulation. The median value with 95% CI, intervals representing error is 14.39 s [13.17-17.85] for CTRL KD (black) boutons and 10.73 s [9.58-11.94] for MFN2 KD (red) boutons; Mann–Whitney U test = 474.5, n1 = 47, n2 = 45, p < 0.0001. C–G, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots quantified from acquired traces in B, with n from three independent experiments. Each n indicates a single bouton that was selected randomly after verification that the bouton stayed in focus and did not drift during acquisition. D, The RRP fraction as determined from the vGlut1-pHluorin fluorescence peak after a 40 AP stimulation, incubation with 65 nm folimycin, and normalization to total vesicle pool (NH4Cl bath). The median value with 95% CI, intervals representing error is 13% [11%-14%] for CTRL KD (black) boutons and 12% [10%-13%] for MFN2 KD (red) boutons; Mann–Whitney U test = 913, n1 = 47, n2 = 45, p = 0.259. E, The RRP as assayed by vGlut1-pHluorin fluorescence peak after a 40 AP stimulation with folimycin but without NH4Cl normalization. The median value with 95% CI, intervals representing error is 0.28 ΔF/F0 [0.22-0.31] for CTRL KD boutons and 0.10 ΔF/F0 [0.07-0.14] for MFN2 KD boutons; Mann–Whitney U test = 182, n1 = 47, n2 = 45, p < 0.0001. F, Total RP fraction assayed measuring the vGlut1-pHluorin fluorescence peak after incubation with 65 nm folimycin and stimulation with 940 AP. The median value with 95% CI, intervals representing error is 63% [59%-67%] for CTRL KD (black) boutons and 49% [41%-55%] for MFN2 KD (red) boutons; Mann–Whitney U test = 323.5, n1 = 47, n2 = 45, p < 0.0001. G, A measure of the total vesicle pool as assayed by vGlut1-pHluorin fluorescence during NH4Cl perfusion. The median value with 95% CI, intervals representing error is 1755 arbitrary fluorescence units (AFU) [1642-1954] for CTRL KD (black) boutons and 1002 AFU [952-1018] for MFN2 KD (red) boutons; Mann–Whitney U test = 124.5, n1 = 47, n2 = 45, p < 0.0001. H, Representative immunoblots used to quantify the indicated synaptic and organelle protein levels in CTRL KD and MFN2 KD neurons. Protein detected and antibody used (clone if monoclonal, species if polyclonal) are listed below the blots, and total protein was assayed by using Lumitein (Biotium) for every condition, including repeated lanes. I, Quantitation of protein levels in MFN2 KD samples, normalized to CTRL KD and total protein. Median values with 95% CI, intervals representing error are 97% [86-124] for actin, 93% [74-129] for VDAC, 101% [71-121] for LAMP1, 48% [31-93] for PSD95, 79% [48-104] for SYT1, 90% [72-104] for SYP, 73% [48-98] for GYR1, 81% [67-106] for SYB2, and 24% [15-45] for MFN2. p values were calculated using Kruskal–Wallis test H = 35.39, n1 = 7, n2 = 7, n3 = 7, n4 = 7, n5 = 7, n6 = 7, n7 = 7, p < 0.0001. Following up multiple comparisons by applying Dunn's correction resulted in the following p values: actin versus PSD95, p = 0.0064; and actin versus MFN2, p < 0.0001. Sample n are from seven independent trials.

The vGlut1-pHluorin results led us to investigate protein levels of select organelle markers and key presynaptic protein levels via immunoblot analysis. We compared CTRL and MFN2 KD neuronal protein levels by examining markers for the cytoskeleton (actin), mitochondria (voltage-dependent anion channel [VDAC]), lysosomes (lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 [LAMP1]), as well as markers of SV proteins (synaptotagmin 1 [SYT1]; synaptophysin [SYP]; synaptogyrin 1 [GYR1]; synaptobrevin 2 [SYB2]), and a postsynaptic marker (postsynaptic density 95 [PSD95]) (Fig. 5H). Protein levels of actin, VDAC, and LAMP1 were unaltered in MFN2 KD neurons; however, presynaptic protein markers were decreased by ∼25%, and PSD95 was decreased by ∼50%. In these trials, MFN2 was decreased by ∼75% (Fig. 5I). These experiments demonstrate that mitochondrial fusion is necessary for normal rates of endocytosis, total amounts of exocytosis, mobilization of the RP during intense stimulation, and the total size of the SV pool.

MFN2 supports presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis

To gain insight into the pHluorin responses, we next investigated presynaptic Ca2+ following a single AP, as well as a train of APs, using presynaptically targeted GCaMP6f (SYP-GCaMP6f) (T. W. Chen et al., 2013). Neurons transduced with GCaMP6f showed dim fluorescent puncta corresponding to presynaptic clusters of SVs, which increased in fluorescence during electrical stimulation. For this analysis, we stimulated with one depolarization (1 AP) at 0.5 s before stimulating with 10 AP at 10 Hz at the 1 s time-mark; the image series ends at 3 s, after the indicator has returned to baseline. The average traces of ΔF/F0 SYP-GCaMP6f are shown in Figure 6A. First, we quantified the peak changes in ΔF/F0 SYP-GCaMP6f and found that the peak signal (peak presynaptic Ca2+) in MFN2 KD neurons was lower following a single AP (Fig. 6B) or 10 APs at 10 Hz (Fig. 6C), compared with CTRL KD neurons, revealing lower presynaptic [Ca2+]i during electrical activity in MFN2 KD conditions. Then we fitted the poststimulus ΔF/F0 SYP-GCaMP6f fluorescence to single exponential decay functions to find the rate of presynaptic Ca2+ clearance (tau; τ). We detected a modest increase in decay rate following a single AP (Fig. 6D) and a much-faster Ca2+ decay following a train stimulation (10 AP at 10 Hz) (Fig. 6E) in MFN2 KD neurons compared with CTRL KD neurons. It is well accepted that presynaptic mitochondria influence exocytosis and Ca2+ (Tang and Zucker, 1997; Billups and Forsythe, 2002; Kwon et al., 2016; Vaccaro et al., 2017), so we examined our Ca2+ (GCaMP6f) and exocytosis (pHluorin) datasets for evidence of two different populations, representing boutons with and without mitochondria. We did not observe segregation, suggesting overlap between these two groups. Overall, the presynaptic GCaMP6f findings suggest an impairment of Ca2+ influx and/or increased Ca2+ efflux from, or sequestration in, the presynaptic compartment, potentially explaining our pHluorin measurements.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

MFN2 supports presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis. A, Average (± 95% CI) traces of synaptophysin-GCaMP6f (SYP-GCaMP6f) fluorescence intensity after a single AP at 0.5 s and a 10 Hz, 10 AP train at 1 s from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) neurons. Traces are ΔF/F0 with n1 = n2 = 36, from three independent experiments; each n indicates a single bouton after verification that the bouton stayed in focus and did not drift during the recording. B, Single AP SYP-GCaMP6f ΔF/F0 peak from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons; median values with 95% CI, intervals representing error were 0.11 ΔF/F0 [0.09-0.14] and 0.09 ΔF/F0 [0.07-0.09] respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 393.5, n1 = n2 = 36, p < 0.0038. B–E, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots quantified from acquired traces in A. C, Ten AP train SYP-GCaMP6f ΔF/F0 peak from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons; median values with 95% CI, intervals representing error were 0.66 ΔF/F0 [0.59-0.77] and 0.56 ΔF/F0 [0.47-0.63], respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 381, n1 = n2 = 36, p = 0.0023. D, Rate of presynaptic Ca2+ clearance (τ) determined from SYP-GCaMP6f fluorescence decay after 1 AP from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons; median values with 95% CI, intervals representing error were 0.13 s [0.12-0.14] and 0.11 s [0.10-0.13], respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 445, n1 = n2 = 36, p = 0.0217. E, Rate of presynaptic Ca2+ clearance (τ) determined from SYP-GCaMP6f fluorescence decay after a 10 AP train at 10 Hz from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons; median values with 95% CI, intervals representing error were 0.26 s [0.22-0.30] and 0.17 s [0.14-0.20], respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 244, n1 = n2 = 36, p < 0.0001.

MFN2 disruption speeds presynaptic Ca2+ clearance by increasing mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake during neuronal activity

To gain further insight into altered presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis during activity, we next used HTL-JF646-BAPTA-AM targeted to the presynapse by synaptophysin-HaloTag (SYP-HT) (Deo et al., 2019; Bradberry and Chapman, 2022). This probe exhibits faster “on” kinetics, allowing us to better probe Ca2+ influx; it also allowed us to calculate the presynaptic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i). With a stimulation paradigm of a single AP, followed by a short recovery and a sensor-saturating stimulation of 50 AP at 50 Hz, followed finally by a longer recovery, we calculated (described in Materials and Methods) the resting [Ca2+]i, [Ca2+]i entry following 1 AP, as well as the [Ca2+]i decay after 1 AP or after a saturating train of APs. Average traces from CTRL and MFN2 KD presynapses are shown in Figure 7A. We found that there was a trend toward lower resting [Ca2+]i in the MFN2 KD condition (Fig. 7B) and no difference in Ca2+ entry in response to 1 AP (Fig. 7C). However, the [Ca2+]i decay (τ) in the MFN2 KD condition was altered. Presynaptic [Ca2+]i decay following 1 AP was well fitted by a single-exponential function, but decay following a 50 AP train required a double-exponential function. These observations agree well with those from previous studies that longer bursts of activity elicit a Ca2+ decay that is well fitted to a double-exponential (Tank et al., 1995; Koester and Sakmann, 2000; Zhang and Linden, 2012), with the second component mediated by mitochondrial Ca2+ flux (Werth and Thayer, 1994). Because this is a high-affinity Ca2+ sensor, the rate of [Ca2+]i decay measured here is not reflective of the absolute clearance rate (Regehr and Atluri, 1995), but relative differences between conditions may still be informative, so we also quantified these. Following a single AP, [Ca2+]i decreases faster in the MFN2 KD than in the CTRL KD condition (Fig. 7D), with the best fit exponentials compared in Figure 7E. Following a 50 AP train, both time constants (τ) representing [Ca2+]i decay also trend faster in the MFN2 KD condition (Fig. 7F), with the best fit exponentials compared in Figure 7G. Interestingly, the τ from 1 AP is the same as the [FAST] τ from the train, suggesting that the same [Ca2+]i decay mechanism governs both processes (compare values from Fig. 7D with those from Fig. 7F [FAST]).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

MFN2 disruption speeds presynaptic Ca2+ clearance by increasing mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake during neuronal activity. A, Average ΔF/Fmax (± 95% CI) traces of synaptophysin-HaloTag (SYP-HT)-bound HTL-JF646-BAPTA fluorescence intensity during electrical stimulation from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) neurons. Neurons were stimulated with 1 AP to quantitate calcium (Ca2+) influx. After 2.5 s, the neurons were maximally stimulated by 50 AP at 50 Hz to saturate the HTL-JF646-BAPTA and to calculate absolute Ca2+ concentration as described in Materials and Methods. Traces are from n1 = n2 = 30 separate boutons, from three independent experiments. B, Resting presynaptic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons; median values were 46.2 nm [95% CI, 32-54] and 33.4 nm [95% CI, 29-37], respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 330, n1 = n2 = 30, p = 0.0765. B–D, F, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots quantified from the traces in A. C, Single AP peak [Ca2+]i from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons; median values were 325.5 nm [95% CI, 282-380] and 298.1 nm [95% CI, 235-381.4], respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 370, n1 = n2 = 30, p = 0.2403. D, Single AP [Ca2+]i τ from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons. Averaged traces were well fitted to single-exponential functions, and median values were 419 ms [95% CI, 372-540] and 283 ms [95% CI, 242-312] for CTRL KD and MFN2 KD, respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 272.5, n1 = n2 = 30, p = 0.0081. E, Single-exponential best fit curves to average CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) [Ca2+]i decay traces from 1 AP stimulation in A. F, A 50 AP stimuli train (50 AP at 50 Hz) [Ca2+]i τ from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons. Averaged traces were well fitted with double-exponential functions, and median values for the [FAST] component were 339 ms [95% CI, 250-513] and 218 ms [95% CI, 165-361] for CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red), respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 246.5, n1 = 26, n2 = 28 (some traces could not be fit by a double exponential), p = 0.0417. Median values for the [SLOW] component were 4.9 s [95% CI, 3.5-7.1] and 3.8 s [95% CI, 2.3-4.5] for CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red), respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 250, n1 = 26, n2 = 28, p = 0.0489. G, Double-exponential best fit curves for the average CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) [Ca2+]i decay traces from 50 AP in A. H, Average ΔF/F0 (± 95% CI) fluorescence intensity traces from axonal mitochondria targeted with GCaMP5G to the mitochondrial matrix (mito-GCaMP5G) during electrical stimulation from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) neurons. Neurons were stimulated with 1 AP at 0.5 s followed by a train stimulus of 40 AP at 20 Hz at 1.5 s. Note: 1 AP did not cause robust mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake in presynaptic mitochondria. Traces are from n1 = 92, n2 = 77, from three independent experiments, with n indicating individual axonal mitochondria. I, Peak mitochondrial Ca2+ (mito-GCaMP5G ΔF/F0) after train (40 AP at 20 Hz) stimulation from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons; median values were 2.04 ΔF/F0 [95% CI, 1.81-2.61] and 3.12 ΔF/F0 [95% CI, 2.86-3.44], respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 2147, n1 = 92, n2 = 77, p < 0.0001. I, J, Graphs represent Tukey box and whisker plots quantified from acquired traces in H. J, Mitochondrial Ca2+ rise time (10%-90%, s) during train stimulation from CTRL KD (black) and MFN2 KD (red) boutons; median values were 1.07 s [95% CI, 0.88-1.20] and 0.83 s [95% CI, 0.67-0.94], respectively; Mann–Whitney U test = 2562, n1 = 92, n2 = 77, p = 0.0019.

After extensive examination of presynaptic [Ca2+]i transients during activity, we became confident that there is little to no change in basal [Ca2+]i and likely no change in [Ca2+]i influx, but an increase in the rate of presynaptic [Ca2+]i clearance. Mitochondria store Ca2+; and because we are perturbing mitochondria, we monitored [Ca2+]mito uptake during activity to potentially explain the changes in [Ca2+]i observed in the presynapses of MFN2 KD neurons. We probed [Ca2+]mito by transfecting mito-GCaMP5G (Kwon et al., 2016) into neurons, identifying axonal mitochondria, and stimulating neurons with a single AP (1 AP) as well as an RRP-depleting stimulus train (40 AP at 20 Hz). Average traces from CTRL and MFN2 KD presynaptic mitochondria are shown in Figure 7H. We found that mitochondria in CTRL KD conditions did not accumulate [Ca2+]mito following a single AP (n = 0 of 92); however, we did observe three instances of [Ca2+]mito accumulation following a single AP in mitochondria from MFN2 KD presynapses (n = 3 of 77). The majority of mitochondria likely do not accumulate [Ca2+]mito following a single AP because, as seen in Figure 7C, [Ca2+]i reaches only ∼300 nm, and the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter is known to have a low affinity (Szabadkai and Duchen, 2008) such that it drives the sequestration of Ca2+ only when local concentrations rise above ∼500 nm (Rizzuto et al., 1992). Because peak [Ca2+]i from a single AP is no different in CTRL conditions than in MFN2 KD conditions (Fig. 7C), the rare ability for MFN2 KD mitochondria to accumulate Ca2+ was unexpected. Upon an RRP-depleting stimulation (40 AP at 20 Hz), mitochondria in both KD conditions accumulated Ca2+. However, MFN2 KD presynaptic mitochondria accumulated ∼50% more Ca2+ (Fig. 7I) and did so at a faster rate (Fig. 7J). Presynaptic mitochondria from MFN2 KD neurons are better than mitochondria from CTRL KD conditions at accumulating [Ca2+]mito during neuronal activity. We expected MFN2 KD to somehow limit mitochondrial function; however, these mitochondria have a clearly enhanced ability to take up cytosolic Ca2+, which may be explained if mitochondria were physically closer to presynaptic Ca2+ channels. We expound on this possibility in the Discussion.

Discussion

Mitochondrial trafficking asymmetry in axons

In the current study, we document differences in mitochondrial trafficking between axons and dendrites, as well as trafficking asymmetry within axons, all under unstressed conditions. Anterograde axonal mitochondria are larger and relatively more reduced; retrograde axonal mitochondria are shorter and relatively more oxidized (Figs. 1 and 2). Importantly, these studies are done in mature, unchallenged, primary dissociated hippocampal cultures, and we use microfluidic devices and MitoTracker dyes to unambiguously define anterograde- and retrograde-moving axonal mitochondria. The mitochondria we observe in Figure 1, in the middle of the microchannel, have trafficked a minimum of 150 μm in a single direction. We believe this is the primary reason that we see such a clear distinction between anterograde and retrograde populations. Our data demonstrate a size (length) and biochemical (redox) trafficking asymmetry of mitochondria in the axon, which we interpret as evidence of an active QC mechanism. Indeed, during our axonal mito-roGFP trafficking experiments, we observed fusion events between relatively reduced anterograde trafficking mitochondria, and stationary, more-oxidized mitochondria. After fusion, their relative redox state appeared to rebalance, providing clear evidence of biochemical complementation.

Role of mitochondrial fusion in maintaining the axonal mitochondrial network

Anterograde mitochondria that are larger and more reduced could either establish new mitochondrial outposts or fuse with resident, stationary axonal mitochondria. We again used microfluidic devices, but this time we examined mitochondrial content mixing in the axon chamber after two-color MitoTracker labeling. In these experiments, we found that resident axonal mitochondria fused with newly trafficked mitochondria at a rate of ∼2% per hour (Fig. 3). Importantly, ∼50% of the newly trafficked axonal mitochondria (MTG+) fuse with the resident pool of axonal mitochondria. This means that half of the newly trafficked mitochondria serve to fuse with, and potentially complement, resident axonal mitochondria; the fate of the other half of the newly trafficked mitochondria is unclear. These experiments demonstrate the dynamic fusion properties of mitochondria within axons and suggest that continual mitochondrial fusion may be important to support the mitochondrial network and axon function (i.e., the SV cycle). Indeed, mitochondrial complementation (via fusion) suppresses mtDNA disease-associated alleles in various mouse tissues (Nakada et al., 2001), and loss of mitochondrial fusion increases mitochondrial heterogeneity and dysfunctional mitochondrial units in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (H. Chen et al., 2005). In INS1 and COS7 cells, fusion is selective and precedes fission events (Twig et al., 2008); in rat DRG neurons, fusion hyperpolarizes mitochondria and promotes ATP synthesis (Suzuki et al., 2018).

MFN2 supports mitochondrial trafficking and fusion in axons to influence the SV cycle

We again used neurons grown in microfluidic devices and labeled with MitoTracker dyes to examine the role of MFN2 in maintaining the axonal mitochondrial network. Altering the expression of the mitochondrial fusion or fission machinery will alter the morphology of mitochondria in axons (Amiri and Hollenbeck, 2008). Disrupting mitochondrial fission leads to loss of mitochondria in dopaminergic axons (Berthet et al., 2014), decreased neurite and synapse formation in primary neuronal cultures (Ishihara et al., 2009), and enhanced depression in acute hippocampal slices (Oettinghaus et al., 2016). Disrupting mutations in MFN2 infamously drive a progressive form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome (Type 2A); these mutations decrease anterograde axonal mitochondrial traffic, thus altering distribution of these organelles (Baloh et al., 2007; Misko et al., 2010, 2012). Finally, suppressing MFN2 expression in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons inhibits differentiation and synaptogenesis (Fang et al., 2016). Here, we found that KD of MFN2 reduces the size and total anterograde trafficking of axonal mitochondria, leading to decreases in the total number of mitochondria, and the total fusion of new mitochondria in axons. Interestingly, the few mitochondria in MFN2 KD neurons that successfully trafficked into the axon had no apparent defects in fusing with resident axonal mitochondria (Fig. 4).

We then investigated the role of mitochondrial trafficking and fusion in supporting a key function of the axon, the SV cycle, by knocking down MFN2 and expressing SV-targeted pHluorin. We found that decreased mitochondrial trafficking and fusion through MFN2 KD lead to faster endocytosis, a reduction in the RRP (but no change in the normalized RRP because of smaller total vesicle pool size), difficulty in mobilizing the RP, and decreased expression of SV-associated proteins (Fig. 5). Here we focused on disrupting fusion through MFN2 KD, but disrupting fission also inhibits the mobilization of the RP at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions (Verstreken et al., 2005), strongly suggesting that mitochondrial localization or morphology influences the SV cycle. However, additional studies in Drosophila suggest that, although mitochondrial morphology is critical for localization and trafficking in the axon, it is dispensable for normal function of the neuron (Trevisan et al., 2018).

The axonal mitochondrial network maintains presynaptic Ca2+

Mitochondria that lack a membrane potential fail to buffer presynaptic Ca2+, resulting in increased synaptic depression rates; this depression is completely rescued by supplementing the buffering capacity of cytosolic Ca2+ (Billups and Forsythe, 2002). Similarly, impairing the ability of presynaptic mitochondria to sequester Ca2+, by decreasing the expression of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter, enhanced synaptic release (Devine et al., 2022). Altering the size of mitochondria also changes their Ca2+ buffering capacity. Smaller mitochondria in MFN2 KD C2C12 myotubes buffer less Ca2+ and have lower resting [Ca2+]i (Naon et al., 2016; Kowaltowski et al., 2019). In addition, disrupting mitochondrial fission in C2C12 myotubes (Kowaltowski et al., 2019) or in mouse pyramidal neurons (Lewis et al., 2018) enhances mitochondrial Ca2+ buffering capacity. The emerging view is that mitochondria influence presynaptic Ca2+ transients to, in turn, modulate presynaptic properties (for recent review, see Datta and Jaiswal, 2021). Our pHluorin results prompted us to investigate presynaptic Ca2+, comparing CTRL KD with MFN2 KD conditions.

We first used a presynaptic targeted GCaMP6f (SYP-GCaMP6f) to monitor [Ca2+]i during AP. GCaMP6f is widely used to monitor neuronal Ca2+ transients at the cell body scale and is reasonably well suited to also monitor presynaptic Ca2+ transients, with its high signal-to-noise ratio, large dynamic range, fast off-rate, and moderately fast on-rate (T. W. Chen et al., 2013). Using this sensor, we found evidence for decreased peak [Ca2+]i in MFN2 KD presynapses following a single AP or using a 10 AP, 10 Hz train stimulation. The [Ca2+]i decays were also faster in MFN2 KD conditions (Fig. 6). To further study presynaptic [Ca2+]i, we used the recently developed far-red BAPTA-based indicator JF646-BAPTA-AM (Deo et al., 2019), which allowed us to calculate resting and peak presynaptic [Ca2+]i following a single AP. This sensor has faster “on” kinetics than GCaMPs, yielding a more accurate measure of Ca2+ influx kinetics. We found a trend toward decreased resting [Ca2+]i and no difference between CTRL KD and MFN2 KD neuron Ca2+ influx from a single AP. We also found that Ca2+ transients in MFN2 KD neurons decayed faster than CTRL KD neurons after a single AP following a saturating train of stimuli (50 AP at 50 Hz) (Fig. 7).

Mitochondria are a key Ca2+ buffer at the presynapse, and loss of this mitochondrial function shortens presynaptic Ca2+ transients in DRG neurons (Werth and Thayer, 1994). Indeed, loss (Marland et al., 2016) or decreased expression (Devine et al., 2022) of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter increases the rate of SV endocytosis in mouse hippocampal neurons; however, the role of Ca2+ in endocytosis is complex. Increased [Ca2+]i either promotes (Neher and Zucker, 1993; Neves et al., 2001; Sankaranarayanan and Ryan, 2001; Wu et al., 2005; Balaji et al., 2008) or inhibits endocytosis (von Gersdorff and Matthews, 1994; Sankaranarayanan and Ryan, 2000; Leitz and Kavalali, 2011; for a thorough review, see Leitz and Kavalali, 2016). Therefore, we followed our Ca2+ journey into the mitochondrial matrix. We monitored matrix Ca2+ accumulation during a single AP and RRP-depleting trains of AP (40 AP at 20 Hz) using mito-GCaMP5G. We expected that mitochondria in MFN2 KD axons would be slightly dysfunctional and, therefore, have a decreased ability to import Ca2+, resulting in faster [Ca2+]i clearance from the presynapse as subsequent, delayed, Ca2+ release from mitochondria would be reduced. However, we observed the opposite: axonal mitochondria from MFN2 KD neurons import ∼50% more Ca2+ than their CTRL KD counterparts do. Although initially confounding, there is precedent in the literature for this, as ablation of MFN2 in cardiomyocytes results in mislocalization of mitochondria to the periphery (Kasahara et al., 2013) and loss of MFN2 in mouse embryonic fibroblasts results in enhanced mitochondrial Ca2+ sequestration during Ca2+ entry from the plasmalemma (Munoz et al., 2013; Naon et al., 2016). So, we interpret our results by concluding that MFN2 KD not only reduces mitochondrial anterograde axonal traffic and axonal mitochondrial fusion but also results in mitochondrial mislocalization, closer to the plasmalemma. There, they are exposed to higher Ca2+ concentrations allowing them to take up larger amounts of Ca2+. This presents an exciting hypothesis: mitochondrial Ca2+ overload may be the genesis of mitochondrial dysfunction in diseases, such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Type 2A and subsequently allow a bolus of Ca2+ release in the axon, which may trigger axonal degeneration (Misko et al., 2012).

In conclusion, MFN2 is a large membrane protein with numerous cellular functions. Its original and most widely recognized function is to catalyze the homotypic fusion of outer mitochondrial membranes (H. Chen et al., 2003). It also either positively (de Brito and Scorrano, 2008; Naon et al., 2016) or negatively (Cosson et al., 2012; Filadi et al., 2015) regulates mitochondria-ER contact sites and may interact with motor adaptors in vertebrates (Misko et al., 2010, 2012). Therefore, the interpretation of phenotypes resulting from constitutive KOs or even acute KD experiments, as done here, should be made with caution. Regardless, these experiments are essential to begin to understand the role of axonal mitochondrial QC and the physiology of the axon. Exciting questions about the fundamental signals that govern the maintenance and QC of the axonal mitochondrial network remain. A large body of research revealed that loss of Δψm marks a mitochondrion for degradation, making it unable to rejoin the network (Pickles et al., 2018), but what is the signal that identifies a mitochondrion for a complementation event? How are mitochondrial fusion and fission events linked? We note that MFN2 itself is sensitive to ROS, and this sensitivity may provide an elegant mechanism to activate the fusion machinery (Shutt et al., 2012; Mattie et al., 2018). Other important questions include the following: How are mitochondria selected for axonal versus dendritic egress from the soma? Is there a QC step at this early stage in trafficking? What are some of the damage markers that build up over time, and can they be influenced? These issues are important for understanding mitochondrial QC mechanisms and how they support the SV cycle and neuronal health.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants MH061876 and NS097362 to E.R.C. J.D.V. was supported by National Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowship F32 NS098604, and the Warren Alpert Distinguished Scholars Fellowship award. E.R.C. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This article is subject to HHMI's Open Access to Publications policy. HHMI laboratory heads have previously granted a nonexclusive CC BY 4.0 license to the public and a sublicensable license to HHMI in their research articles. Pursuant to those licenses, the author-accepted manuscript of this article can be made freely available under a CC BY 4.0 license immediately upon publication. We thank the E.R.C. laboratory members for valuable discussions related to the manuscript; Christina Greer andEmma T. Watson for critical reading of the manuscript and edits; Dr. Cherise Guess for editing the manuscript; and Devin T. Larson, John H. Rinald, and Brianna Stumpner for excellent technical assistance.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Jason D. Vevea at jvevea{at}stjude.org or Edwin R. Chapman at chapman{at}wisc.edu

SfN exclusive license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Amiri M,
    2. Hollenbeck PJ
    (2008) Mitochondrial biogenesis in the axons of vertebrate peripheral neurons. Dev Neurobiol 68:1348–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20668 pmid:18666204
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Area-Gomez E,
    2. Guardia-Laguarta C,
    3. Schon EA,
    4. Przedborski S
    (2019) Mitochondria, OxPhos, and neurodegeneration: cells are not just running out of gas. J Clin Invest 129:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI120848 pmid:30601141
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ashrafi G,
    2. Schlehe JS,
    3. LaVoie MJ,
    4. Schwarz TL
    (2014) Mitophagy of damaged mitochondria occurs locally in distal neuronal axons and requires PINK1 and Parkin. J Cell Biol 206:655–670. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201401070 pmid:25154397
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Atasoy D,
    2. Ertunc M,
    3. Moulder KL,
    4. Blackwell J,
    5. Chung C,
    6. Su J,
    7. Kavalali ET
    (2008) Spontaneous and evoked glutamate release activates two populations of NMDA receptors with limited overlap. J Neurosci 28:10151–10166. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2432-08.2008 pmid:18829973
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Balaban RS,
    2. Nemoto S,
    3. Finkel T
    (2005) Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging. Cell 120:483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.001 pmid:15734681
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Balaji J,
    2. Armbruster M,
    3. Ryan TA
    (2008) Calcium control of endocytic capacity at a CNS synapse. J Neurosci 28:6742–6749. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1082-08.2008 pmid:18579748
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Baloh RH,
    2. Schmidt RE,
    3. Pestronk A,
    4. Milbrandt J
    (2007) Altered axonal mitochondrial transport in the pathogenesis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease from mitofusin 2 mutations. J Neurosci 27:422–430. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4798-06.2007 pmid:17215403
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Berthet A,
    2. Margolis EB,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Hsieh I,
    5. Zhang J,
    6. Hnasko TS,
    7. Ahmad J,
    8. Edwards RH,
    9. Sesaki H,
    10. Huang EJ,
    11. Nakamura K
    (2014) Loss of mitochondrial fission depletes axonal mitochondria in midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurosci 34:14304–14317. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0930-14.2014 pmid:25339743
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Billups B,
    2. Forsythe ID
    (2002) Presynaptic mitochondrial calcium sequestration influences transmission at mammalian central synapses. J Neurosci 22:5840–5847. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-14-05840.2002 pmid:12122046
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Bolte S,
    2. Cordelieres FP
    (2006) A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J Microsc 224:213–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x pmid:17210054
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bomba-Warczak E,
    2. Vevea JD,
    3. Brittain JM,
    4. Figueroa-Bernier A,
    5. Tepp WH,
    6. Johnson EA,
    7. Yeh FL,
    8. Chapman ER
    (2016) Interneuronal transfer and distal action of tetanus toxin and botulinum neurotoxins A and D in central neurons. Cell Rep 16:1974–1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.104 pmid:27498860
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Bomba-Warczak E,
    2. Edassery SL,
    3. Hark TJ,
    4. Savas JN
    (2021) Long-lived mitochondrial cristae proteins in mouse heart and brain. J Cell Biol 220:e202005193. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202005193 pmid:34259807
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Bradberry MM,
    2. Chapman ER
    (2022) All-optical monitoring of excitation-secretion coupling demonstrates that SV2A functions downstream of evoked Ca(2+) entry. J Physiol 600:645–654. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP282601 pmid:34957569
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Burrone J,
    2. Li Z,
    3. Murthy VN
    (2006) Studying vesicle cycling in presynaptic terminals using the genetically encoded probe synaptopHluorin. Nat Protoc 1:2970–2978. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.449 pmid:17406557
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Cai Q,
    2. Zakaria HM,
    3. Simone A,
    4. Sheng ZH
    (2012) Spatial parkin translocation and degradation of damaged mitochondria via mitophagy in live cortical neurons. Curr Biol 22:545–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.005 pmid:22342752
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Chanaday NL,
    2. Cousin MA,
    3. Milosevic I,
    4. Watanabe S,
    5. Morgan JR
    (2019) The synaptic vesicle cycle revisited: new insights into the modes and mechanisms. J Neurosci 39:8209–8216. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1158-19.2019 pmid:31619489
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Chapman AL,
    2. Bennett EJ,
    3. Ramesh TM,
    4. De Vos KJ,
    5. Grierson AJ
    (2013) Axonal transport defects in a mitofusin 2 loss of function model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in zebrafish. PLoS One 8:e67276. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067276 pmid:23840650
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Chen H,
    2. Chan DC
    (2009) Mitochondrial dynamics–fusion, fission, movement, and mitophagy: in neurodegenerative diseases. Hum Mol Genet 18:R169–R176. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp326 pmid:19808793
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Chen H,
    2. Detmer SA,
    3. Ewald AJ,
    4. Griffin EE,
    5. Fraser SE,
    6. Chan DC
    (2003) Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J Cell Biol 160:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200211046 pmid:12527753
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Chen H,
    2. Chomyn A,
    3. Chan DC
    (2005) Disruption of fusion results in mitochondrial heterogeneity and dysfunction. J Biol Chem 280:26185–26192. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M503062200 pmid:15899901
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Chen TW,
    2. Wardill TJ,
    3. Sun Y,
    4. Pulver SR,
    5. Renninger SL,
    6. Baohan A,
    7. Schreiter ER,
    8. Kerr RA,
    9. Orger MB,
    10. Jayaraman V,
    11. Looger LL,
    12. Svoboda K,
    13. Kim DS
    (2013) Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12354 pmid:23868258
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Cosson P,
    2. Marchetti A,
    3. Ravazzola M,
    4. Orci L
    (2012) Mitofusin-2 independent juxtaposition of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria: an ultrastructural study. PLoS One 7:e46293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046293 pmid:23029466
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Craig AM,
    2. Banker G
    (1994) Neuronal polarity. Annu Rev Neurosci 17:267–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.001411 pmid:8210176
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Datta S,
    2. Jaiswal M
    (2021) Mitochondrial calcium at the synapse. Mitochondrion 59:135–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2021.04.006 pmid:33895346
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. de Brito OM,
    2. Scorrano L
    (2008) Mitofusin 2 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria. Nature 456:605–610. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07534 pmid:19052620
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. de Juan-Sanz J,
    2. Holt GT,
    3. Schreiter ER,
    4. de Juan F,
    5. Kim DS,
    6. Ryan TA
    (2017) Axonal endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) content controls release probability in CNS nerve terminals. Neuron 93:867–881.e866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.010 pmid:28162809
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Deo C,
    2. Sheu SH,
    3. Seo J,
    4. Clapham DE,
    5. Lavis LD
    (2019) Isomeric tuning yields bright and targetable red Ca(2+) indicators. J Am Chem Soc 141:13734–13738. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b06092 pmid:31430138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Devine MJ,
    2. Szulc BR,
    3. Howden JH,
    4. Lopez-Domenech G,
    5. Ruiz A,
    6. Kittler JT
    (2022) Mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter haploinsufficiency enhances long-term potentiation at hippocampal mossy fibre synapses. J Cell Sci 135:jcs259823.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Dooley CT,
    2. Dore TM,
    3. Hanson GT,
    4. Jackson WC,
    5. Remington SJ,
    6. Tsien RY
    (2004) Imaging dynamic redox changes in mammalian cells with green fluorescent protein indicators. J Biol Chem 279:22284–22293. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M312847200 pmid:14985369
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Ebrahimi-Fakhari D,
    2. Saffari A,
    3. Wahlster L,
    4. DiNardo A,
    5. Turner D,
    6. Lewis TL Jr.,
    7. Conrad C,
    8. Rothberg JM,
    9. Lipton JO,
    10. Kolker S,
    11. Hoffmann GF,
    12. Han MJ,
    13. Polleux F,
    14. Sahin M
    (2016) Impaired mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy in neuronal models of tuberous sclerosis complex. Cell Rep 17:2162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.051 pmid:27851977
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Eisner V,
    2. Picard M,
    3. Hajnoczky G
    (2018) Mitochondrial dynamics in adaptive and maladaptive cellular stress responses. Nat Cell Biol 20:755–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0133-0 pmid:29950571
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Eura Y,
    2. Ishihara N,
    3. Yokota S,
    4. Mihara K
    (2003) Two mitofusin proteins, mammalian homologues of FZO, with distinct functions are both required for mitochondrial fusion. J Biochem 134:333–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvg150 pmid:14561718
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Evans CS,
    2. Holzbaur EL
    (2020) Degradation of engulfed mitochondria is rate-limiting in Optineurin-mediated mitophagy in neurons. Elife 9:e50260.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Faitg J,
    2. Lacefield C,
    3. Davey T,
    4. White K,
    5. Laws R,
    6. Kosmidis S,
    7. Reeve AK,
    8. Kandel ER,
    9. Vincent AE,
    10. Picard M
    (2021) 3D neuronal mitochondrial morphology in axons, dendrites, and somata of the aging mouse hippocampus. Cell Rep 36:109509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109509 pmid:34380033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Fang D,
    2. Yan S,
    3. Yu Q,
    4. Chen D,
    5. Yan SS
    (2016) Mfn2 is required for mitochondrial development and synapse formation in human induced pluripotent stem cells/hiPSC derived cortical neurons. Sci Rep 6:31462. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31462 pmid:27535796
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Filadi R,
    2. Greotti E,
    3. Turacchio G,
    4. Luini A,
    5. Pozzan T,
    6. Pizzo P
    (2015) Mitofusin 2 ablation increases endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E2174–E2181. pmid:25870285
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Hanson GT,
    2. Aggeler R,
    3. Oglesbee D,
    4. Cannon M,
    5. Capaldi RA,
    6. Tsien RY,
    7. Remington SJ
    (2004) Investigating mitochondrial redox potential with redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein indicators. J Biol Chem 279:13044–13053. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M312846200 pmid:14722062
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Higuchi R,
    2. Vevea JD,
    3. Swayne TC,
    4. Chojnowski R,
    5. Hill V,
    6. Boldogh IR,
    7. Pon LA
    (2013) Actin dynamics affect mitochondrial quality control and aging in budding yeast. Curr Biol 23:2417–2422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.022 pmid:24268413
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Ishihara N,
    2. Nomura M,
    3. Jofuku A,
    4. Kato H,
    5. Suzuki SO,
    6. Masuda K,
    7. Otera H,
    8. Nakanishi Y,
    9. Nonaka I,
    10. Goto Y,
    11. Taguchi N,
    12. Morinaga H,
    13. Maeda M,
    14. Takayanagi R,
    15. Yokota S,
    16. Mihara K
    (2009) Mitochondrial fission factor Drp1 is essential for embryonic development and synapse formation in mice. Nat Cell Biol 11:958–966. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1907 pmid:19578372
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Jordan M,
    2. Wurm F
    (2004) Transfection of adherent and suspended cells by calcium phosphate. Methods 33:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2003.11.011 pmid:15121168
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Kasahara A,
    2. Cipolat S,
    3. Chen Y,
    4. Dorn GW 2nd.,
    5. Scorrano L
    (2013) Mitochondrial fusion directs cardiomyocyte differentiation via calcineurin and Notch signaling. Science 342:734–737. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241359 pmid:24091702
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Katajisto P,
    2. Dohla J,
    3. Chaffer CL,
    4. Pentinmikko N,
    5. Marjanovic N,
    6. Iqbal S,
    7. Zoncu R,
    8. Chen W,
    9. Weinberg RA,
    10. Sabatini DM
    (2015) Stem cells: asymmetric apportioning of aged mitochondria between daughter cells is required for stemness. Science 348:340–343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260384 pmid:25837514
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Koester HJ,
    2. Sakmann B
    (2000) Calcium dynamics associated with action potentials in single nerve terminals of pyramidal cells in layer 2/3 of the young rat neocortex. J Physiol 529:625–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00625.x pmid:11118494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Kowaltowski AJ,
    2. Menezes-Filho SL,
    3. Assali EA,
    4. Goncalves IG,
    5. Cabral-Costa JV,
    6. Abreu P,
    7. Miller N,
    8. Nolasco P,
    9. Laurindo FR,
    10. Bruni-Cardoso A,
    11. Shirihai OS
    (2019) Mitochondrial morphology regulates organellar Ca(2+) uptake and changes cellular Ca(2+) homeostasis. FASEB J 33:13176–13188. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201901136R pmid:31480917
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Kugler S,
    2. Kilic E,
    3. Bahr M
    (2003) Human synapsin 1 gene promoter confers highly neuron-specific long-term transgene expression from an adenoviral vector in the adult rat brain depending on the transduced area. Gene Ther 10:337–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301905 pmid:12595892
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Kuzniewska B,
    2. Cysewski D,
    3. Wasilewski M,
    4. Sakowska P,
    5. Milek J,
    6. Kulinski TM,
    7. Winiarski M,
    8. Kozielewicz P,
    9. Knapska E,
    10. Dadlez M,
    11. Chacinska A,
    12. Dziembowski A,
    13. Dziembowska M
    (2020) Mitochondrial protein biogenesis in the synapse is supported by local translation. EMBO Rep 21:e48882. pmid:32558077
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Kwon SK,
    2. Sando R 3rd.,
    3. Lewis TL,
    4. Hirabayashi Y,
    5. Maximov A,
    6. Polleux F
    (2016) LKB1 regulates mitochondria-dependent presynaptic calcium clearance and neurotransmitter release properties at excitatory synapses along cortical axons. PLoS Biol 14:e1002516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002516 pmid:27429220
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Leitz J,
    2. Kavalali ET
    (2011) Ca(2)(+) influx slows single synaptic vesicle endocytosis. J Neurosci 31:16318–16326. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3358-11.2011 pmid:22072683
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Leitz J,
    2. Kavalali ET
    (2016) Ca2+ dependence of synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Neuroscientist 22:464–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858415588265 pmid:25998187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Lewis TL Jr.,
    2. Kwon SK,
    3. Lee A,
    4. Shaw R,
    5. Polleux F
    (2018) MFF-dependent mitochondrial fission regulates presynaptic release and axon branching by limiting axonal mitochondria size. Nat Commun 9:5008. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07416-2 pmid:30479337
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Burrone J,
    3. Tyler WJ,
    4. Hartman KN,
    5. Albeanu DF,
    6. Murthy VN
    (2005) Synaptic vesicle recycling studied in transgenic mice expressing synaptopHluorin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6131–6136. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501145102 pmid:15837917
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Liao PC,
    2. Tandarich LC,
    3. Hollenbeck PJ
    (2017) ROS regulation of axonal mitochondrial transport is mediated by Ca2+ and JNK in Drosophila. PLoS One 12:e0178105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178105 pmid:28542430
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Lin MY,
    2. Cheng XT,
    3. Tammineni P,
    4. Xie Y,
    5. Zhou B,
    6. Cai Q,
    7. Sheng ZH
    (2017) Releasing syntaphilin removes stressed mitochondria from axons independent of mitophagy under pathophysiological conditions. Neuron 94:595–610.e596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.004 pmid:28472658
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Lin TH,
    2. Bis-Brewer DM,
    3. Sheehan AE,
    4. Townsend LN,
    5. Maddison DC,
    6. Zuchner S,
    7. Smith GA,
    8. Freeman MR
    (2021) TSG101 negatively regulates mitochondrial biogenesis in axons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e208770118.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Lois C,
    2. Hong EJ,
    3. Pease S,
    4. Brown EJ,
    5. Baltimore D
    (2002) Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors. Science 295:868–872. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067081 pmid:11786607
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Mandal A,
    2. Wong HC,
    3. Pinter K,
    4. Mosqueda N,
    5. Beirl A,
    6. Lomash RM,
    7. Won S,
    8. Kindt KS,
    9. Drerup CM
    (2021) Retrograde mitochondrial transport is essential for organelle distribution and health in zebrafish neurons. J Neurosci 41:1371–1392. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1316-20.2020 pmid:33376159
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Maravall M,
    2. Mainen ZF,
    3. Sabatini BL,
    4. Svoboda K
    (2000) Estimating intracellular calcium concentrations and buffering without wavelength ratioing. Biophys J 78:2655–2667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76809-3 pmid:10777761
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Marland JR,
    2. Hasel P,
    3. Bonnycastle K,
    4. Cousin MA
    (2016) Mitochondrial calcium uptake modulates synaptic vesicle endocytosis in central nerve terminals. J Biol Chem 291:2080–2086. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.686956 pmid:26644474
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Matsuda T,
    2. Cepko CL
    (2004) Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235688100 pmid:14603031
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Mattie S,
    2. Riemer J,
    3. Wideman JG,
    4. McBride HM
    (2018) A new mitofusin topology places the redox-regulated C terminus in the mitochondrial intermembrane space. J Cell Biol 217:507–515. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201611194 pmid:29212658
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. McFaline-Figueroa JR,
    2. Vevea J,
    3. Swayne TC,
    4. Zhou C,
    5. Liu C,
    6. Leung G,
    7. Boldogh IR,
    8. Pon LA
    (2011) Mitochondrial quality control during inheritance is associated with lifespan and mother-daughter age asymmetry in budding yeast. Aging Cell 10:885–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00731.x pmid:21726403
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Miesenbock G,
    2. De Angelis DA,
    3. Rothman JE
    (1998) Visualizing secretion and synaptic transmission with pH-sensitive green fluorescent proteins. Nature 394:192–195. https://doi.org/10.1038/28190 pmid:9671304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Miller KE,
    2. Sheetz MP
    (2004) Axonal mitochondrial transport and potential are correlated. J Cell Sci 117:2791–2804. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01130 pmid:15150321
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Misko A,
    2. Jiang S,
    3. Wegorzewska I,
    4. Milbrandt J,
    5. Baloh RH
    (2010) Mitofusin 2 is necessary for transport of axonal mitochondria and interacts with the Miro/Milton complex. J Neurosci 30:4232–4240. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6248-09.2010 pmid:20335458
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Misko AL,
    2. Sasaki Y,
    3. Tuck E,
    4. Milbrandt J,
    5. Baloh RH
    (2012) Mitofusin2 mutations disrupt axonal mitochondrial positioning and promote axon degeneration. J Neurosci 32:4145–4155. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6338-11.2012 pmid:22442078
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Mou Y,
    2. Dein J,
    3. Chen Z,
    4. Jagdale M,
    5. Li XJ
    (2021) MFN2 deficiency impairs mitochondrial transport and downregulates motor protein expression in human spinal motor neurons. Front Mol Neurosci 14:727552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2021.727552 pmid:34602978
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Munoz JP,
    2. Ivanova S,
    3. Sanchez-Wandelmer J,
    4. Martinez-Cristobal P,
    5. Noguera E,
    6. Sancho A,
    7. Diaz-Ramos A,
    8. Hernandez-Alvarez MI,
    9. Sebastian D,
    10. Mauvezin C,
    11. Palacin M,
    12. Zorzano A
    (2013) Mfn2 modulates the UPR and mitochondrial function via repression of PERK. EMBO J 32:2348–2361. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.168 pmid:23921556
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Nakada K,
    2. Inoue K,
    3. Ono T,
    4. Isobe K,
    5. Ogura A,
    6. Goto YI,
    7. Nonaka I,
    8. Hayashi JI
    (2001) Inter-mitochondrial complementation: mitochondria-specific system preventing mice from expression of disease phenotypes by mutant mtDNA. Nat Med 7:934–940. https://doi.org/10.1038/90976 pmid:11479626
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Naon D,
    2. Zaninello M,
    3. Giacomello M,
    4. Varanita T,
    5. Grespi F,
    6. Lakshminaranayan S,
    7. Serafini A,
    8. Semenzato M,
    9. Herkenne S,
    10. Hernandez-Alvarez MI,
    11. Zorzano A,
    12. Stefani D,
    13. Dorn GW 2nd.,
    14. Scorrano L
    (2016) Critical reappraisal confirms that Mitofusin 2 is an endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria tether. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:11249–11254. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606786113 pmid:27647893
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Neher E,
    2. Zucker RS
    (1993) Multiple calcium-dependent processes related to secretion in bovine chromaffin cells. Neuron 10:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(93)90238-M pmid:8427700
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Neves G,
    2. Gomis A,
    3. Lagnado L
    (2001) Calcium influx selects the fast mode of endocytosis in the synaptic terminal of retinal bipolar cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:15282–15287. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.261311698 pmid:11734626
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Oettinghaus B,
    2. Schulz JM,
    3. Restelli LM,
    4. Licci M,
    5. Savoia C,
    6. Schmidt A,
    7. Schmitt K,
    8. Grimm A,
    9. More L,
    10. Hench J,
    11. Tolnay M,
    12. Eckert A,
    13. D'Adamo P,
    14. Franken P,
    15. Ishihara N,
    16. Mihara K,
    17. Bischofberger J,
    18. Scorrano L,
    19. Frank S
    (2016) Synaptic dysfunction, memory deficits and hippocampal atrophy due to ablation of mitochondrial fission in adult forebrain neurons. Cell Death Differ 23:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.39 pmid:25909888
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Overly CC,
    2. Rieff HI,
    3. Hollenbeck PJ
    (1996) Organelle motility and metabolism in axons vs dendrites of cultured hippocampal neurons. J Cell Sci 109:971–980. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.109.5.971 pmid:8743944
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Patterson GH,
    2. Lippincott-Schwartz J
    (2002) A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells. Science 297:1873–1877. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074952 pmid:12228718
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Pickles S,
    2. Vigie P,
    3. Youle RJ
    (2018) Mitophagy and quality control mechanisms in mitochondrial maintenance. Curr Biol 28:R170–R185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.004 pmid:29462587
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Regehr WG,
    2. Atluri PP
    (1995) Calcium transients in cerebellar granule cell presynaptic terminals. Biophys J 68:2156–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80398-X pmid:7612860
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Rizzuto R,
    2. Simpson AW,
    3. Brini M,
    4. Pozzan T
    (1992) Rapid changes of mitochondrial Ca2+ revealed by specifically targeted recombinant aequorin. Nature 358:325–327. https://doi.org/10.1038/358325a0 pmid:1322496
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Sankaranarayanan S,
    2. Ryan TA
    (2000) Real-time measurements of vesicle-SNARE recycling in synapses of the central nervous system. Nat Cell Biol 2:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/35008615 pmid:10783237
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Sankaranarayanan S,
    2. Ryan TA
    (2001) Calcium accelerates endocytosis of vSNAREs at hippocampal synapses. Nat Neurosci 4:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/83949 pmid:11175872
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Sankaranarayanan S,
    2. De Angelis D,
    3. Rothman JE,
    4. Ryan TA
    (2000) The use of pHluorins for optical measurements of presynaptic activity. Biophys J 79:2199–2208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76468-X pmid:11023924
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Schindelin J,
    2. Arganda-Carreras I,
    3. Frise E,
    4. Kaynig V,
    5. Longair M,
    6. Pietzsch T,
    7. Preibisch S,
    8. Rueden C,
    9. Saalfeld S,
    10. Schmid B,
    11. Tinevez JY,
    12. White DJ,
    13. Hartenstein V,
    14. Eliceiri K,
    15. Tomancak P,
    16. Cardona A
    (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019 pmid:22743772
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Schon EA,
    2. Przedborski S
    (2011) Mitochondria: the next (neurode)generation. Neuron 70:1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.003 pmid:21689593
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Serdar CC,
    2. Cihan M,
    3. Yucel D,
    4. Serdar MA
    (2021) Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 31:010502. pmid:33380887
  84. ↵
    1. Shutt T,
    2. Geoffrion M,
    3. Milne R,
    4. McBride HM
    (2012) The intracellular redox state is a core determinant of mitochondrial fusion. EMBO Rep 13:909–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.128 pmid:22945481
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. ↵
    1. Spinelli JB,
    2. Haigis MC
    (2018) The multifaceted contributions of mitochondria to cellular metabolism. Nat Cell Biol 20:745–754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0124-1 pmid:29950572
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Suzuki R,
    2. Hotta K,
    3. Oka K
    (2018) Transitional correlation between inner-membrane potential and ATP levels of neuronal mitochondria. Sci Rep 8:2993. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21109-2 pmid:29445117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Szabadkai G,
    2. Duchen MR
    (2008) Mitochondria: the hub of cellular Ca2+ signaling. Physiology (Bethesda) 23:84–94. pmid:18400691
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Tang Y,
    2. Zucker RS
    (1997) Mitochondrial involvement in post-tetanic potentiation of synaptic transmission. Neuron 18:483–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81248-9 pmid:9115741
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Tank DW,
    2. Regehr WG,
    3. Delaney KR
    (1995) A quantitative analysis of presynaptic calcium dynamics that contribute to short-term enhancement. J Neurosci 15:7940–7952. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-12-07940.1995 pmid:8613732
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    1. Trevisan T,
    2. Pendin D,
    3. Montagna A,
    4. Bova S,
    5. Ghelli AM,
    6. Daga A
    (2018) Manipulation of mitochondria dynamics reveals separate roles for form and function in mitochondria distribution. Cell Rep 23:1742–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.017 pmid:29742430
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Twig G,
    2. Elorza A,
    3. Molina AJ,
    4. Mohamed H,
    5. Wikstrom JD,
    6. Walzer G,
    7. Stiles L,
    8. Haigh SE,
    9. Katz S,
    10. Las G,
    11. Alroy J,
    12. Wu M,
    13. Py BF,
    14. Yuan J,
    15. Deeney JT,
    16. Corkey BE,
    17. Shirihai OS
    (2008) Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. EMBO J 27:433–446. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601963 pmid:18200046
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Vaccaro V,
    2. Devine MJ,
    3. Higgs NF,
    4. Kittler JT
    (2017) Miro1-dependent mitochondrial positioning drives the rescaling of presynaptic Ca2+ signals during homeostatic plasticity. EMBO Rep 18:231–240. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201642710 pmid:28039205
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Verburg J,
    2. Hollenbeck PJ
    (2008) Mitochondrial membrane potential in axons increases with local nerve growth factor or semaphorin signaling. J Neurosci 28:8306–8315. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2614-08.2008 pmid:18701693
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. ↵
    1. Verstreken P,
    2. Ly CV,
    3. Venken KJ,
    4. Koh TW,
    5. Zhou Y,
    6. Bellen HJ
    (2005) Synaptic mitochondria are critical for mobilization of reserve pool vesicles at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions. Neuron 47:365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.018 pmid:16055061
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Vevea JD,
    2. Chapman ER
    (2020) Acute disruption of the synaptic vesicle membrane protein synaptotagmin 1 using knockoff in mouse hippocampal neurons. Elife 9:e56469.
    OpenUrl
  96. ↵
    1. Vevea JD,
    2. Alessi Wolken DM,
    3. Swayne TC,
    4. White AB,
    5. Pon LA
    (2013) Ratiometric biosensors that measure mitochondrial redox state and ATP in living yeast cells. J Vis Exp 77:50633.
    OpenUrl
  97. ↵
    1. Voglmaier SM,
    2. Kam K,
    3. Yang H,
    4. Fortin DL,
    5. Hua Z,
    6. Nicoll RA,
    7. Edwards RH
    (2006) Distinct endocytic pathways control the rate and extent of synaptic vesicle protein recycling. Neuron 51:71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.027 pmid:16815333
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. von Gersdorff H,
    2. Matthews G
    (1994) Inhibition of endocytosis by elevated internal calcium in a synaptic terminal. Nature 370:652–655. https://doi.org/10.1038/370652a0 pmid:8065451
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Winter D,
    3. Ashrafi G,
    4. Schlehe J,
    5. Wong YL,
    6. Selkoe D,
    7. Rice S,
    8. Steen J,
    9. LaVoie MJ,
    10. Schwarz TL
    (2011) PINK1 and Parkin target Miro for phosphorylation and degradation to arrest mitochondrial motility. Cell 147:893–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.018 pmid:22078885
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Werth JL,
    2. Thayer SA
    (1994) Mitochondria buffer physiological calcium loads in cultured rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurosci 14:348–356. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-01-00348.1994 pmid:8283242
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  101. ↵
    1. Wu W,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Wu XS,
    4. Wu LG
    (2005) Activity-dependent acceleration of endocytosis at a central synapse. J Neurosci 25:11676–11683. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2972-05.2005 pmid:16354926
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. ↵
    1. Youle RJ,
    2. van der Bliek AM
    (2012) Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science 337:1062–1065. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219855 pmid:22936770
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  103. ↵
    1. Zhang W,
    2. Linden DJ
    (2012) Calcium influx measured at single presynaptic boutons of cerebellar granule cell ascending axons and parallel fibers. Cerebellum 11:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-009-0151-3 pmid:20049574
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Zheng Y,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Wu X,
    4. Jiang L,
    5. Ahsan A,
    6. Ma SX,
    7. Han F,
    8. Qin ZH,
    9. Hu W,
    10. Chen Z
    (2019) Somatic autophagy of axonal mitochondria in ischemic neurons. J Cell Biol 218:1891–1907. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201804101 pmid:30979799
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 43 (19)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 43, Issue 19
10 May 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mitofusin 2 Sustains the Axonal Mitochondrial Network to Support Presynaptic Ca2+ Homeostasis and the Synaptic Vesicle Cycle in Rat Hippocampal Axons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Mitofusin 2 Sustains the Axonal Mitochondrial Network to Support Presynaptic Ca2+ Homeostasis and the Synaptic Vesicle Cycle in Rat Hippocampal Axons
Jason D. Vevea, Edwin R. Chapman
Journal of Neuroscience 10 May 2023, 43 (19) 3421-3438; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1356-22.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Mitofusin 2 Sustains the Axonal Mitochondrial Network to Support Presynaptic Ca2+ Homeostasis and the Synaptic Vesicle Cycle in Rat Hippocampal Axons
Jason D. Vevea, Edwin R. Chapman
Journal of Neuroscience 10 May 2023, 43 (19) 3421-3438; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1356-22.2023
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • mitochondria
  • mitochondrial complementation
  • mitofusin 2
  • quality control
  • synaptic vesicle cycle

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Effective Regulation of Auditory Processing by Parvalbumin Interneurons in the Tail of the Striatum
  • Chronic Adaptations in the Dorsal Horn following a cervical spinal cord injury in primates
  • A Developmental Switch in Cholinergic Mechanisms of Modulation in the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body
Show more Research Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Inactivation of ERK1/2 signaling in dopaminergic neurons by map kinase phosphatase MKP3 regulates dopamine signaling and motivation for cocaine
  • Loss of Depalmitoylation Disrupts Homeostatic Plasticity of AMPARs in a Mouse Model of Infantile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis
  • Protein 4.1N Plays a Cell Type-Specific Role in Hippocampal Glutamatergic Synapse Regulation
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.