Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Cellular/Molecular

The SphK1/S1P Axis Regulates Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis via TRPC5 Channels

Zhong-Jiao Jiang and Liang-Wei Gong
Journal of Neuroscience 24 May 2023, 43 (21) 3807-3824; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1494-22.2023
Zhong-Jiao Jiang
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liang-Wei Gong
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive sphingolipid concentrated in the brain, is essential for normal brain functions, such as learning and memory and feeding behaviors. Sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1), the primary kinase responsible for S1P production in the brain, is abundant within presynaptic terminals, indicating a potential role of the SphK1/S1P axis in presynaptic physiology. Altered S1P levels have been highlighted in many neurologic diseases with endocytic malfunctions. However, it remains unknown whether the SphK1/S1P axis may regulate synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons. The present study evaluates potential functions of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis by determining effects of a dominant negative catalytically inactive SphK1. Our data for the first time identify a critical role of the SphK1/S1P axis in endocytosis in both neuroendocrine chromaffin cells and neurons from mice of both sexes. Furthermore, our Ca2+ imaging data indicate that the SphK1/S1P axis may be important for presynaptic Ca2+ increases during prolonged stimulations by regulating the Ca2+ permeable TRPC5 channels, which per se regulate synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Collectively, our data point out a critical role of the regulation of TRPC5 by the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1), the primary kinase responsible for brain sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) production, is abundant within presynaptic terminals. Altered SphK1/S1P metabolisms has been highlighted in many neurologic disorders with defective synaptic vesicle endocytosis. However, whether the SphK1/S1P axis may regulate synaptic vesicle endocytosis is unknown. Here, we identify that the SphK1/S1P axis regulates the kinetics of synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons, in addition to controlling fission-pore duration during single vesicle endocytosis in neuroendocrine chromaffin cells. The regulation of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis is specific since it has a distinguished signaling pathway, which involves regulation of Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 channels. This discovery may provide novel mechanistic implications for the SphK1/S1P axis in brain functions under physiological and pathologic conditions.

  • calcium
  • cell-attached capacitance recordings
  • live-cell imaging
  • Sphingosine-1-phosphate
  • synaptic vesicle endocytosis
  • TRPC5

Introduction

Synaptic transmission, mediated by exocytosis of synaptic vesicles, is sustained by subsequent endocytosis, an essential process to recapture and reuse membranes that have fused with the plasma membrane from exocytosis (Saheki and De Camilli, 2012; Rizzoli, 2014; Soykan et al., 2016). Synaptic vesicle endocytosis is thus indispensable for normal brain functions (Saheki and De Camilli, 2012; Rizzoli, 2014; Soykan et al., 2016), and deficiency in endocytic machinery has been highlighted in many neurologic disorders including multiple sclerosis, Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease (Cataldo et al., 2000; Schreij et al., 2016; Alsaqati et al., 2018; Kyung et al., 2018; Helbig et al., 2019; McAdam et al., 2020; Pensalfini et al., 2020; Barron et al., 2021; Kesharwani et al., 2021). Nevertheless, the precise molecular mechanisms for synaptic vesicle endocytosis are still far from being fully understood (Chanaday et al., 2019; Rennick et al., 2021).

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive sphingolipid concentrated in the brain (Edsall and Spiegel, 1999; Karunakaran and van Echten-Deckert, 2017), is essential for normal brain functions. For example, S1P in hippocampus is critical for spatial learning as assessed by water maze test (Kanno et al., 2010) or T-maze test (Weth-Malsch et al., 2016), while S1P in hypothalamus regulates energy homeostasis by controlling feeding behaviors (Silva et al., 2014). On the other hand, altered S1P metabolism has been linked to many neurologic diseases (Ghasemi et al., 2016; Karunakaran and van Echten-Deckert, 2017; Di Pardo and Maglione, 2018). In addition, fingolimod (FTY720), a S1P analog approved by Food and Drug Administration to treat multiple sclerosis (Chiba and Adachi, 2012; Ali et al., 2013), may slow down pathologic changes in the brain tissue from animal models for Alzheimer's disease (Karunakaran and van Echten-Deckert, 2017; Yin et al., 2021). These important functions of S1P within the brain under physiological and pathologic conditions reflect a role of S1P in synaptic transmission. Indeed, it has been reported that S1P modulates synaptic strength and plasticity (Kanno et al., 2010; Kempf et al., 2014; Weth-Malsch et al., 2016).

Sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1) is the primary kinase responsible for S1P production in the brain (Fukuda et al., 2003; Bryan et al., 2008). The presynaptic SphK1 abundance (Kajimoto et al., 2007; Chan et al., 2012) indicates an involvement of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic transmission via presynaptic mechanisms. In line with this idea, the SphK1/S1P axis has been reported to be critical for synaptic vesicle exocytosis in neurons from both Caenorhabditis elegans and mice (Kajimoto et al., 2007; Chan et al., 2012). In non-neuronal cells, SphK1 has been found to be enriched on physiologically occurring early endocytic intermediates and a disruption of the SphK1/S1P axis induces significant endocytic defects (Shen et al., 2014; Young et al., 2016; Lima et al., 2017). In mouse and human brains, defects of synaptic vesicle endocytosis and altered S1P levels have been concurrently identified as pathologic features for neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease and Huntington disease (Couttas et al., 2014; Pirhaji et al., 2016; Schreij et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2018; Di Pardo et al., 2019; McAdam et al., 2020; Pensalfini et al., 2020). However, it remains unknown whether the SphK1/S1P axis may regulate synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons.

In the present study, we evaluate potential functions of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis by determining effects of a dominant negative catalytically inactive SphK1 (SphK1DN) in neurons and chromaffin cells (Pitson et al., 2000; Bonhoure et al., 2006; Gomez-Brouchet et al., 2007; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2019b). Based on data from synaptophysin-pHluorin (sypHy) based live-cell imaging in neurons and cell-attached capacitance recordings in chromaffin cells, we for the first time identify a critical role of the SphK1/S1P axis in neuronal endocytosis. Furthermore, our Ca2+ imaging indicates that the SphK1/S1P axis may be important for presynaptic Ca2+ increases during prolonged stimulations via Ca2+ permeable TRPC5 channels, which per se regulate synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Altogether, our data point out an importance of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis via TRPC5 channels in neurons.

Materials and Methods

Cultures of neurons, chromaffin cells, and HEK 293 cells

In this study, newborn pups of either sexes (postnatal day 0) from C577BL/6J (RRID: IMSR JAX:000664) mouse mating cages were used and cared in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health, as approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Illinois at Chicago (approval number of 19-189). Neuronal culture from cortex was prepared as describe previously (Vevea and Chapman, 2020; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021). Briefly, cortical neurons were isolated and gently dissociated with papain (Worthington; LS003127) and mechanical disruption before plated on glass coverslips (Assistant; 41001118) coated with poly-D-lysine (Sigma; P0899). Neurons were maintained in Neurobasal-A (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 10888-022) medium supplemented with B-27 (2%, Thermo Fisher Scientific; 17504001), Glutamax (2 mm, Invitrogen; 35050061), and penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified incubator. To minimize potential consequences from previously reported roles of the SphK1/S1P axis or TRPC5 in neuronal development (Greka et al., 2003; Mizugishi et al., 2005; Davare et al., 2009; Puram et al., 2011), lentiviral transduction in the present study were exclusively performed in neurons at days in vitro (DIV)11–DIV12 when the initial wave of synaptogenesis is complete (Bassani et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2017; Ribeiro et al., 2019; Griggs et al., 2021; Nawalpuri et al., 2021); accordingly, live-cell imaging experiments were conducted on neurons at DIV16–DIV20.

Chromaffin cells in culture, prepared from adrenal glands of newborn pups with either sex as previously described (Gong et al., 2005; L.H. Yao et al., 2012, 2013), were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified incubator and used within 4 d for electrophysiology. Lentiviral transduction was conducted at DIV0, and cell-attached capacitance recordings was performed 72–96 h after infection.

HEK 293 cells were cultured and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.1 mm MEM nonessential amino acids, 6 mm L-glutamine, 1 mm MEM sodium pyruvate, 1% Pen-Strep, and 500 µg/ml Geneticin antibiotic. Cells, which typically reached 80% confluence every 3 d, were treated with trypsin-EDTA and passaged with a 1:10 ratio for the general maintenance. Cells dissociated were seeded onto 24-well culture plates and transfected with Lipofectamine LTX Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific; catalog #15338100), at 40–50% confluency. Transfected cells were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator for 48–72 h before being trypsinized and seeded to PDL-coated coverslips for whole-cell patch clamping recordings.

Cloning of DNA constructs

Plasmids containing sypHy and SynGCAMP6f were kind gifts from Dr. L. Lagnado lab (Granseth et al., 2006) and Dr. T. A. Ryan lab (de Juan-Sanz et al., 2017), respectively. The lentiviral vector pCDH-EF1-MCS-T2A-GFP was from System Biosciences. pCDH-EF1-SphK1DN-T2A-GFP, pCDH-EF1-SphK1WT (N-terminal FLAG tag), pCDH-EF1-SphK1DN (N-terminal FLAG tag), pCDH-SYN1-sypHy and pCDH-SYN1-SynGCAMP6f were previously generated in our lab (Z.J. Jiang et al., 2019b, 2021). The protein-coding cDNA clone of mouse TRPC5, clone ID 22 067 (BC112972), was purchased from transOMIC technologies. To obtain pCDH-SYN1-SphK1DN-T2A-sypHy or pCDH-SYN1-SphK1DN-T2A-synGCaMP6f, SphK1DN was amplified by PCR, together with sypHy or synGCaMP6f, and then enzyme-digested and ligated into multiple cloning sites before and after T2A in pCDH-SYN1-MCS-T2A-MCS (a tool vector we have created in lab). Thereafter, pCDH-SYN1-SphK1DN-T2A-synaptophysin-mCherry was created by replacing pHluorin in pCDH-SYN1-SphK1DN-T2A-sypHy with mCherry via restriction digest and ligation. To obtain pCDH-SYN1-sypHy-T2A-TRPC5DN, TRPC5WT was first amplified by PCR and then enzyme-digested and ligated between the BspEI and PmeI sites after T2A in pCDH-SYN1-sypHy-T2A-MCS, which was created previously in the lab from pCDH-SYN1-sypHy by deleting the stop codon in sypHy. TRPC5DN mutation (LFW-AAA; Strübing et al., 2003) was then made by QuikChange PCR (Stratagene), with pCDH-SYN1-sypHy-T2A- TRPC5WT as the template, thus creating pCDH-SYN1-sypHy-T2A-TRPC5DN. Full length SphK1, TRPC5 and their mutants, together with sypHy and synGCaMP6f, amplified by PCR were verified by Sanger sequencing.

Lentiviral productions

Low-passage HEK 293 cells were co-transfected with 10 μg pCDH lentiviral vectors containing genes of interests, along with 7-μg packaging vector psPAX2 and 3 μg envelope vector pMD2.VSVG, using the polyethylenimine-mediated transfection method. The supernatant containing lentiviral particles was collected and filtered through 0.45 μm filter to remove cell debris at 48 and 72 h. Lentiviral particles, concentrated by PEG-it precipitation kits from System Bioscience, were re-suspended in cold PBS and stored at –80°C.

Drugs and reagents

Stock solutions were prepared by dissolving the following molecules: S1P (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog #S9666) at 1 mm in methanol; FTY720 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog #SML0700) at 100 μm in ddH2O, CAY10444 (Cayman Chemicals, catalog #10005033) at 1 mm in dimethyl formamide, and W146 (Cayman Chemicals, catalog #10009109) at 0.2 mm in methanol. Stock solutions were then diluted to final concentrations into culture medium for neurons, or bath solution for HEK293 cells. Neurons in culture were co-preincubated with CAY10444 (10 μm), a selective S1P3 antagonist, and W146 (4 μm), a selective S1P1 antagonist, for 1 h before overnight 1 nm FTY720 incubation. During electrophysiological recordings of whole-cell TRPC5 currents, 5 μm S1P is directly applied extracellularly with a pressurized local perfusion system (VC3, ALA scientific instruments) placed ∼40 μm away from the patched cell.

Immunocytochemistry

Neurons in culture were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 37°C. Fixed neurons were washed twice with PBS and then permeabilized and quenched for 15 min in PBS with 0.2% saponin and 50 mm ammonium chloride at room temperature. Samples were next incubated for 1 h in blocking buffer (PBS with 5% normal donkey serum, 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.02% sodium azide (NaN3), and 0.04% saponin) at room temperature. Primary antibodies were either diluted 1:500 (mouse anti-FLAG, clone M2, Sigma-Aldrich F1804, RRID:AB_262044) or 1:1000 (rabbit anti- synaptophysin, Synaptic Systems catalog #101002, RRID: AB_887905) in blocking buffer and incubated with neurons overnight at 4°C. Fluorescent dye-conjugated secondary antibodies (donkey anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 555: A-31570, RRID:AB_2536180; donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 488: A-21206, RRID:AB_2535792; Thermo Fisher Scientific) were diluted at 1:1000 in the blocking buffer, and incubated with cells for 1 h at room temperature. Images were collected on an Olympus IX51 microscope with a 60× oil immersion objective and captured by a Prime BSI Scientific CMOS (sCMOS) camera (Teledyne Photometrics) controlled by μManager software (https://micro-manager.org/). A Semrock TRITC-B filter cube (543/22-nm excitation, 593/40-nm emission, 562-nm dichroic mirror) was used for Alexa Fluor 555 signals, with a Semrock GFP-3053B filter cube (473/31-nm excitation, 520/35-nm emission, 495-nm dichroic mirror) for Alexa Fluor 488 signals.

Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) of FLAG to synaptophysin was measured using Just Another Colocalization Plugin (JACoP) plugin in Fiji (Bolte and Cordelières, 2006). Two to three fields of view with an absence of cell bodies were randomly selected from each coverslip, and PCCs were analyzed using Costes' automatic threshold in JACoP. Data are pooled from coverslips of two independent cultures.

Live-cell imaging in neurons

Experiments were performed on an Olympus IX51 microscope with a 60× oil immersion objective at room temperature except 35–37°C in Figure 2E,F, with a GFP-3035B filter cube (472/30-nm excitation, 520/35-nm emission, 495-nm dichroic mirror; Semrock) as the filter set. Neurons on coverslips were continuously perfused at a flow rate of ∼1 ml/min with bath solution (130 mm NaCl, 2.8 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 10 mm glucose, 10 mm HEPES; pH 7.4 and ∼310 mOsm). To stimulate neurons, we used Chamlide magnetic perfusion chamber (Live Cell instrument) equipped with two parallel platinum electrodes (embedded within the perfusion chamber with 7-mm spacing), which serve as field electrodes to deliver electric field stimulation at 10 V/cm with 1-ms duration to induce action potentials (APs) firing in neurons; 20 μm CNQX (Tocris Bioscience) and 50 μm D-AP5 (Tocris Bioscience) were included in the bath solution to prevent recurrent activities.

To achieve high quantum efficiency, we used the Prime BSI Scientific CMOS (sCMOS) camera (Teledyne Photometrics) controlled by μManager software (micro-manager.org) for capturing images. To achieve a sampling rate of 100 Hz for experiments of single AP stimulations and minimize photobleaching for experiments of train stimulations, the electrical stimulation via a programmable isolated high-powered stimulator (AM Systems, Model 4100), illumination via λ 421 Optical Beam Combining System (Sutter Instruments) and data acquisition via camera were simultaneously controlled by TTL output signals via Igor software (RRID: SCR_000325, WaveMetrics). For Ca2+ imaging experiments using SynGCaMP6f, the light intensity of illumination was set at 40% in combination with a 10-ms exposure time for single AP experiments stimulation or 20% in combination with a 100-ms exposure time for train stimulations. Images were captured at a 1- or 2-s interval with 100-ms exposure time at 20% illumination during sypHy experiments.

To measure reacidification rate of newly formed endocytic vesicles using sypHy as described previously (Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021), neurons on coverslip were rapidly superfused with a valve controlled pressurized perfusion system (ALA Scientific). The perfusing buffer was switched between the standard pH 7.3 bath solution described above and pH 5.5 buffer with the HEPES substituted with equimolar MES, with electrical stimulation time-locked to frame acquisition and buffer changes. Specifically, surface fluorescence of pHluorin is quenched by the first application of acidic buffer (pH 5.5) for 6s to establish the baseline, and the quenched fluorescence is recovered by washing off the acidic solution. To isolate pHluorin signal from newly endocytosed SVs, acidic buffer (pH 5.5) is applied for a 30-s duration 2 s right after the cessation of stimulation train. Newly endocytosed alkaline pool of pHluorin is detached from the plasma membrane and thus resistant to quenching by the applied acidic buffer, and the decay of this portion of fluorescence to the baseline represents acidification of newly endocytosed vesicles. Therefore, reacidification rate of newly endocytosed vesicles is estimated by an exponential fit of the fluorescent signal decay from the first to the last point during the 30-s duration of acidic buffer application.

To measure vesicles exocytosis as previously described (Balaji and Ryan, 2007; Baumgart et al., 2015), boutons were stimulated in the presence or absence of 1 μm bafilomycin A1 (Cayman, catalog #11038), which eliminated interference of endocytosis by blocking reacidification of endocytosed vesicles. Tyrode's solution containing 50 mm NH4Cl were perfused at the end of each test to collapse the pH gradient across vesicle membrane thus revealing the total pool.

Image analysis

Images from sypHy experiments were analyzed in ImageJ (RRID: SCR_000415; http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij) using custom-written plugins (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/plugins/time-series.html) and Igor software using custom-written procedures. Photobleaching was <2% for all images included in our analysis and thus was not corrected. To analyze images from sypHy experiments, regions of interest (ROIs) of identical size (4 × 4 pixels) were placed in the center of individual synaptic boutons reacting to stimuli, and fluorescence changes were tracked throughout the image stack. In general, 10–25 ROIs were analyzed from each coverslip for sypHy experiments. With Igor, fluorescent intensities of individual ROIs before stimuli were averaged as baseline (F0), the fluorescent changes (ΔF) were normalized to the baseline (F0) as ΔF/F0 or the fluorescence changes induced by NH4Cl (ΔFNH4Cl) as ΔF/ΔFNH4Cl for exocytosis, or to the peak of fluorescent increase (ΔFmax) as ΔF/ΔFmax for endocytosis. Normalized ΔF of individual ROIs were taken as independent replicates (n) for each sypHy experiment, acquired from 7–12 coverslips of two to four cultures.

To analyze data for SynGCaMP6f experiments, ROIs were created as previously reported in Fiji (https://fiji.sc/; Vevea and Chapman, 2020; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021). Briefly, ROIs (>10 pixels), defined by a series of image subtractions and thresholding, were used to measure fluorescence changes of image stacks. Next, fluorescent intensities of individual ROIs before stimuli were averaged as baseline (F0), and the fluorescent changes (ΔF) were normalized to the baseline (F0) as ΔF/F0 in Igor. The independent replicates (n) for each SynGCaMP6f study, pooled from two to four cultures, was measured as the average of normalized ΔF of all ROIs from each coverslip.

Cell-attached capacitance recordings and analyses of endocytic fission-pore

Cell-attached capacitance recordings of membrane capacitance and conductance were performed as described previously (L.H. Yao et al., 2012, 2013). Fire polished pipettes had a typical resistance of ∼2 megaohms in the bath solution. The bath solution contained 130 mm NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 10 mm HEPES-NaOH, and 10 mm HEPES-NaOH; the pH was adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH. As mentioned previously (L.H. Yao et al., 2012, 2013), capacitance steps and fission-pore durations were considered as reliably detected for step sizes >0.2 fF, and smaller capacitance steps are not included in the analysis. Endocytic events were recorded right after gigaseal formation, since we often detected action currents in the membrane current trace as shown previously (Dernick et al., 2005), which indicates firing of action potentials likely induced by mechanic stimulus of patching in chromaffin cells. The number of endocytic events per patch detected in the cell-attached recordings is counted as the total number of downward capacitance steps within the first 5 min of recordings (L.H. Yao et al., 2012, 2013). The fission-pore Gp for endocytic events was calculated as Gp(Im) = ω⋅Cv(ω⋅CvIm)−1 (Gong et al., 2005; L.H. Yao et al., 2012, 2013). The fission-pore duration was defined as the time interval from the first point where Gp decreased below 2 nS and the final drop in Gp to zero. This final drop reflects the step response of the low pass filter setting of the lock-in amplifier (1 ms, 24 dB). At this setting, 90% of the final value is reached within ∼7 ms, so the last point of the fission-pore was taken as the time at 7–10 ms before the final drop to zero in the Gp trace. The fission-pore conductance Gp was taken as the average Gp value during the fission-pore duration time interval. Analysis of fission-pore kinetics were restricted to fission-pores with durations >15 ms, since shorter events were distorted by the lock-in amplifier low-pass filter (set to 1 ms, 24 dB; L.H. Yao et al., 2012, 2013). Data are pooled from coverslips of four independent cultures.

Whole-cell recordings of TRPC5 currents in HEK 293 cells

TRPC5 currents were monitored in HEK 293 cells using the whole-cell configuration as previously reported (Xu et al., 2006; Gomis et al., 2008; Blair et al., 2009). The bath solution contained 130 mm NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 10 mm HEPES-NaOH, and 10 mm glucose; the pH was adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH, and the osmolarity was ∼310 mmol/kg. The solution in the whole-cell pipette contained 130 mm Cs-MeSO3, 5 mm Na2ATP, 0.1 mm Na3GTP, 2 mm MgCl2, 1.3 mm CaCl2, 2 mm EGTA-CsOH, and 10 mm HEPES; the pH was adjusted to 7.3 with CsOH, and the osmolarity was adjusted to 290 mmol/kg. The voltage ramp protocol holds cells at −60 mV, steps to –100 mV for 40 ms, and then ramps to +100 mV over 500 ms, holding at +100 mV for 40 ms before stepping back to −60 mV, and this protocol is repeated every 5 s during recordings. Series resistance was monitored by applying a voltage step of 10 mV. Current signals were filtered at 3 kHz and digitized at 20 kHz. Only recordings with an initial pipette-membrane seal resistance >2 GΩ were included. Current traces and time courses were analyzed with customized macro for Igor software.

Statistical analysis

Data were tested for normal distribution and, if necessary, log-transformed for the fission-pore duration in Figures 3E to fulfill the criteria of normal distributions for Student's t tests. All statistical analyses were performed with Prism (RRID: SCR_002798, GraphPad).

No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size, but our samples sizes are comparable to those reported in previous studies (Fernández-Alfonso and Ryan, 2004; Granseth et al., 2006; L.H. Yao et al., 2012, 2013; Soykan et al., 2017; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021). Cells were randomly assigned into control or experimental groups, and data were expressed as mean ± SEM, with all values from quantification plotted as gray dots in the bar graph. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired two-tailed Student's t test, except paired two-tailed Student's t test in Figure 8H and Newman of one-way ANOVA in Figures 4B,D, 7B, and 8B. All analyses were performed by an investigator blinded to the experimental condition. N numbers, full statistics, and p values were reported and listed in the related figure legends and Extended Data Table 1-1.

Extended Data Table 1-1

The list of statistical analyses for all figures. Download Table 1-1, DOCX file.

Results

SphK1DN inhibits the readily release Pool (RRP) during exocytosis in neurons

SphK1, a kinase essential for S1P production in central nervous system, is concentrated within presynaptic terminals in neurons (Fukuda et al., 2003; Kajimoto et al., 2007; Bryan et al., 2008; Chan et al., 2012). A dominant-negative mutant, SphK1DN (G82D) is reported to significantly inhibit S1P production (Lan et al., 2011; Pitson et al., 2002; Qi et al., 2015). In neuroendocrine chromaffin cells, we have previously demonstrated that downregulation of S1P production by SphK1DN induces significant defects in vesicle exocytosis (Z.J. Jiang et al., 2019b). In neurons, SphK1DN expressed by lentivirus displays a similar presynaptic localization as wild-type (WT) SphK1 (SphK1WT; Fig. 1A,B), which is not surprising as this SphK1DN mutant only harbors a single amino acid substitution in its kinase catalytic domain (Pitson et al., 2000; Alemany et al., 2007). We next analyzed effects of SphK1DN on synaptic vesicle recycling in cortical neuron cultures using sypHy (Granseth and Lagnado, 2008; Royle et al., 2008). SphK1DN significantly reduced the fluorescence increase of sypHy signals induced by 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations (p < 0.001; Fig. 1C,D), indicating a role of SphK1 in synaptic vesicle exocytosis. It is aware that such an increase in sypHy fluorescence likely represents a net outcome of synaptic vesicle exocytosis and endocytosis (Fernández-Alfonso and Ryan, 2004; Voglmaier et al., 2006). To eliminate any interference of endocytic signals, the increase in sypHy signals during stimulations were measured in the presence of the H+ ATPase inhibitor bafilomycin A1 (Granseth et al., 2006; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021). To our expectation, the increase of sypHy signals was also inhibited by SphK1DN under this condition, thus confirming a role of SphK1 kinase activity in synaptic vesicle exocytosis (p < 0.001; Fig. 1E,F).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

SphK1DN inhibits RRP during exocytosis. A, Representative micrographs of immunofluorescence of synaptophysin and exogenously expressed SphK1WT or SphK1DN show similar presynaptic localizations of these two SphK1 versions. Scale bar: 5 μm. B, No significant differences in the Pearson's correlation coefficient of SphK1WT or SphK1DN to synaptophysin (SphK1WT: n = 10 fields of view from 4 coverslips; SphK1DN: n = 10 fields of view from 4 coverslips, p = 0.6367). C, Normalized changes of sypHy fluorescence in response to a 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulation in control or SphK1DN-expressing neurons. D, Bar graph comparing the peak of normalized fluorescence increases in control or SphK1DN-expressing neurons (control: n = 167 boutons; SphK1DN: n = 166 boutons). E, F, In the presence of bafilomycin A1, time course (E) and bar graph (F) of increases in the sypHy signals induced by a 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulation in control or SphK1DN-expressing neurons. Fluorescence increases induced by electrical stimulations are normalized to that by NH4Cl application (control: n = 128 boutons; SphK1DN: n = 131 boutons). G, In the presence of bafilomycin A1, time course of normalized sypHy fluorescence increases induced by a 600 APs at 10-Hz stimulation in control and SphK1DN-expressing neurons. H, Bar graph showing no effects of SphK1DN on the time constant of TRP depletion kinetics, which is measured by exponentially fitting sypHy increases during stimulations (p = 0.6656). I, Bar graph showing SphK1DN has no influences on TRP size (p = 0.9057; control: n = 145 boutons; SphK1DN: n = 147 boutons). J, In the presence of bafilomycin A1, time course of normalized sypHy fluorescence increases induced by a 40 APs at 20-Hz stimulation in control and SphK1DN-expressing neurons. K, Bar graph showing a reduction in the RRP size by SphK1DN (control: n = 89 boutons; SphK1DN: n = 89 boutons). L, In the presence of bafilomycin A1, time course of fluorescence increases of sypHy induced by two successive 40 APs at 20-Hz stimulations with a time interval of 5 s in control and SphK1DN-expressing neurons. Fluorescence changes are normalized to those induced by the first stimulation. M, Bar graph showing a smaller recovery of RRP in neurons expressing SphK1DN (control: n = 129 boutons; SphK1DN: n = 121 boutons). **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001, unpaired two-tailed Student's t test.

We next determined effects of SphK1DN on the total recycling pool (TRP) and readily releasable pool (RRP), two pools that are essential in determining the amount of synaptic vesicle exocytosis (S.H. Kim and Ryan, 2010; Alabi and Tsien, 2012; Baumgart et al., 2015). As reported previously, TRP was evaluated as fluorescence increases of sypHy in response to stimulations of 600 APs at 10 Hz (Fig. 1G; Ryan and Smith, 1995; Z. Hua et al., 2011). Our results showed that SphK1DN did not alter either the size or the depletion kinetics of TRP (p > 0.05; Fig. 1H,I). On the other hand, RRP was evaluated as sypHy increases in response to 40 APs at 20-Hz stimulation (Fig. 1J; Murthy and Stevens, 1999; Schikorski and Stevens, 2001; Li et al., 2005; Granseth et al., 2006; Granseth and Lagnado, 2008). Additionally, the replenishment of RRP was estimated as fluorescent increase induced by the second 40 APs at 20-Hz stimulation 5 s after RRP depletion by the first 40 APs at 20-Hz stimulation, as described previously (Granseth and Lagnado, 2008). SphK1DN significantly reduced RRP size (p < 0.001; Fig. 1J,K) and slowed down RRP replenishment (p < 0.01; Fig. 1L,M). Collectively, this set of experiments indicate that SphK1 kinase activity may be critical for synaptic vesicle exocytosis by regulating RRP rather than TRP within presynaptic terminals.

SphK1DN slows down synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons

To determine any potential roles of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis, we examined effects of SphK1DN on the decay kinetics of sypHy signals on the cessation of stimulations (Fig. 2A). SphK1DN substantially increased the time constant of sypHy fluorescence decay (p < 0.001; Fig. 2B), with no alternation in the reacidification kinetics of newly formed endocytic vesicles (p > 0.05; Fig. 2C,D), indicating an importance of SphK1 kinase activity in synaptic vesicle endocytosis. In addition, we observed an increase in the endocytic time constant induced by SphK1DN at the physiological temperature of 35–37°C (p < 0.001; Fig. 2E,F), thus reiterating an importance of SphK1 kinase activity in synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Synaptic vesicle endocytosis is impaired in SphK1DN-expressing neurons. A, Normalized fluorescence changes of sypHy signals in control and SphK1DN-expressing neurons. B, Bar graph showing an increase in the endocytic time constant by SphK1DN (control: n = 121 boutons; SphK1DN: n = 117 boutons). C, Normalized sypHy signals with two perfusion periods with pH 5.5 MES buffer as indicated in the trace (gray bars). Newly endocytosed vesicles “trapped” during acidic buffer perfusion starting 2 s after 100 APs at 20 Hz. D, Bar graph comparing the reacidification rate of endocytic vesicles, which was obtained by exponential fittings of fluorescence decay, indicates no change in this parameter by SphK1DN (control: n = 117 boutons; SphK1DN: n = 115 boutons, p = 0.4198). E, Normalized changes of sypHy signals in control and SphK1DN-expressing neurons at 35–37°C. F, Bar graph comparing the endocytic time constant shows an increase in the endocytic time constant induced by SphK1DN at physiological temperature (control: n = 101 boutons; SphK1DN: n = 100 boutons). ***p < 0.001, unpaired two-tailed Student's t test.

SphK1DN prolongs fission-pore duration during endocytosis in chromaffin cells

To understand whether the SphK1/S1P axis is involved in the modulation of vesicle fission, a critical and arguably rate limiting step during endocytosis (Haucke et al., 2011; Saheki and De Camilli, 2012; Kononenko and Haucke, 2015; Kaksonen and Roux, 2018), we analyzed effects of SphK1DN on the fission-pore kinetics in neuroendocrine chromaffin cells by monitoring single vesicle endocytosis with cell-attached capacitance recordings as described previously (Fig. 3A; L.H. Yao et al., 2012; Varga et al., 2020; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021). SphK1DN induced a 17.8% reduction in the number of endocytic events, although this reduction was not significant (Fig. 3B). Meanwhile, the capacitance size of endocytic vesicles was comparable between these two groups (Fig. 3C), indicating that SphK1 may not be critical in controlling the size of endocytic vesicles. Additionally, SphK1DN had no obvious effect on the fission-pore conductance (Gp; Fig. 3D), implying that SphK1 may not be essential in determining the geometry of the tubular membrane neck during endocytosis. However, SphK1DN significantly increased the fission-pore duration (p < 0.001; Fig. 3E), indicating an essential role of SphK1 kinase activity in vesicle fission during endocytosis.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

SphK1DN slows down vesicle fission during endocytosis in neuroendocrine chromaffin cells. A, Representative endocytic events, as membrane conductance (Re), membrane capacitance (Im) and the fission-pore conductance (Gp), in control and SphK1DN-expressing cells. B–E, The number of endocytic events (control: n = 83 cells; SphK1DN: n = 69 cells, p = 0.2501; B), the capacitance Cv of endocytic vesicles (p = 0.8041; C), and the fission-pore Gp (p = 0.7110; D) were statistically comparable between control and SphK1DN-expressing cells; the log transformed fission-pore duration (E) was significantly increased in SphK1DN-expressing cells (control: n = 36 events; SphK1DN: n = 48 events). ***p < 0.001, unpaired two-tailed Student's t test.

S1P receptors are crucial for the SphK1/S1P axis-mediated actions in synaptic vesicle exocytosis but not endocytosis

FTY720, a clinical oral treatment of relapsing remittent multiple sclerosis (Chiba and Adachi, 2012; Ali et al., 2013), is a synthetic S1P analog (Nofer et al., 2007). We thus examined whether FTY720 could rescue exocytic and endocytic defects of synaptic vesicles induced by SphK1DN. Neurons in culture expressing SphK1DN were incubated with FTY720 at a low concentration of 1 nm overnight to mimic in vivo applications in animals (Stessin et al., 2012; Di Menna et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2017). FTY720 treatments significantly enhanced the fluorescence increase of sypHy in response to 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations (Fig. 4A,B) and reduced the endocytic time constant of sypHy signal decay after the cessation of stimulations (Fig. 4C,D), suggesting that FTY720 may be capable of rescuing SphK1DN induced exocytic and endocytic defects in neurons. These data emphasize an importance of S1P in SphK1DN-mediated actions in synaptic vesicle exocytosis and endocytosis, thus emphasizing critical roles of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle recycling within presynaptic terminals. Notably, it has been reported that the S1P-induced effect on synaptic transmission at presynaptic terminals is mostly mediated through activation of S1P3 and/or S1P1 receptors (Kajimoto et al., 2007; Sim-Selley et al., 2009; Kanno and Nishizaki, 2011; Riganti et al., 2016; Willems et al., 2016). Hence, we next examined whether co-preincubations of W146, a specific S1P1 receptor inhibitor (Sanna et al., 2006; Ammar et al., 2013; Riganti et al., 2016), and CAY10444, a specific S1P3 receptor inhibitor (Koide et al., 2002; Pyne and Pyne, 2011; Riganti et al., 2016), would be able to block FTY720-mediated rescues we have observed. W146 and CAY10444 treatments indeed abolished FTY720-mediated rescue on the increase of sypHy fluorescence induced by stimulations (Fig. 4A,B), suggesting that S1P1/S1P3 receptors may mediate the role of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle exocytosis. On the other hand, treatments with W146 and CAY10444 had no detectable effects on the FTY720-mediated rescue on the endocytic time constant on the cessation of stimulations (Fig. 4C,D), indicating that S1P1/S1P3 receptors may be dispensable for the regulation of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

S1P1/S1P3 receptors are critical for the FTY720-mediated rescue on synaptic vesicle exocytosis but not endocytosis in SphK1DN-expressing neurons. A, In the presence of bafilomycin A1, synaptic vesicle exocytosis induced by electrical stimulations was measured by normalizing the fluorescence increase induced by electrical stimulation to that by NH4Cl perfusion in SphK1DN-expressing neurons under variable conditions (control, FTY720, or FTY720/W146/CAY10444). FTY720 is a clinical S1P analog; W146 and CAY10444 are specific antagonists for S1P1 and S1P3 receptors, respectively. B, Bar graph comparing synaptic vesicle exocytosis in SphK1DN-expressing neurons between these three groups as shown in A (control: n = 95 boutons; FTY720: n = 85 boutons; FTY720 and S1PR antagonists: n = 106 boutons). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test: FTY720 versus control (*p < 0.05); FTY720 and S1PR antagonists versus FTY720 (***p < 0.001). C, Normalized changes of sypHy signals in SphK1DN-expressing neurons under different conditions (control, FTY720, or FTY720 and S1P1/S1P3 inhibitors). D, Bar graph comparing the endocytic time constant in SphK1DN-expressing neurons shows that FTY720 treatment accelerates synaptic vesicle endocytosis independent of S1PR inhibitors (control: n = 162 boutons; FTY720: n = 159 boutons; FTY720 and S1PR inhibitors: n = 178 boutons). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test: FTY720 versus control (**p < 0.01); FTY720 and S1PR inhibitors versus FTY720 (p = 0.2759; ns: not statistically significant).

The SphK1/S1P axis is important for presynaptic Ca2+ levels during prolonged stimulations

Previous studies in non-neuronal cells have implied important roles of S1P in modulating intracellular Ca2+ signaling (Ghosh et al., 1990; Itagaki and Hauser, 2003; Spiegel and Milstien, 2003; Xu et al., 2006). Since Ca2+ is a key regulating factor for synaptic vesicle endocytosis (Cousin, 2000; Wu et al., 2009; Wu and Wu, 2014; Chanaday et al., 2019; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021), it is possible that a regulation of presynaptic Ca2+ signaling may account for the action of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis we have observed. To test this possibility, we examined effects of SphK1DN on presynaptic Ca2+ signaling using synGCaMP6f (GCaMP6f fused with synaptophysin), a presynaptic Ca2+ reporter with fast speed and high sensitivity (Chen et al., 2013; Kyung et al., 2017; Brockhaus et al., 2019; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021). SphK1DN did not alter the increase of synGCaMP6f signals induced by single AP stimulation (Fig. 5A,B; p > 0.05), indicative of no change in Ca2+ influx via VGCCs (S.H. Kim and Ryan, 2013; Brockhaus et al., 2019; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021). It should be noted that a deflection of the SynGCaMP6f fluorescence signal was observed in the decay phase at around 110 ms following single AP stimulation (Fig. 5A). We suggest that this deflection may be because of, but not limited to, that single AP fluorescence responses of individual ROIs peak within the 110-ms period after stimulus, with variability in the time of the signal to peak (Fig. 6A–D), and its presence has no impact on the exponential decay of the averaged fluorescent signal (Fig. 6E,F). On the other hand, the increase in synGCaMP6f signals induced by 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations was significantly reduced by SphK1DN (p < 0.05; Fig. 5C,D), suggesting an importance of the SphK1/S1P axis in regulating presynaptic Ca2+ influx during prolonged stimulations. This conclusion is further supported by our observation that FTY720 enhanced the increase in synGCaMP6f signals induced by 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations in SphK1DN-expressing neurons (p < 0.001), which is independent of S1P1/S1P3 receptors (Fig. 7). Presynaptic Ca2+ influx on prolonged stimulations has been well documented to be essential for synaptic vesicle endocytosis (C.K. Yao et al., 2009, 2017; Wu and Wu, 2014; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021), our data thus indicate that the SphK1/S1P axis may regulate synaptic vesicle endocytosis by modulating presynaptic Ca2+ levels during prolonged stimulations.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

SphK1DN impairs presynaptic Ca2+ increase in response to prolonged stimulations rather than single AP stimulation. A, Normalized synGCaMP6f increases induced by single AP in control or SphK1DN-expressing neurons. Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with black and red line as the averaged response of individual coverslips in control and SphK1DN group, respectively. Raw data for Ca2+ increases induced by single AP are presented in Figure 6. B, Bar graph comparing peak synGCaMP6f values as shown in A reveals no change in Ca2+ signals by SphK1DN (control: n = 21 coverslips; SphK1DN: n = 20 coverslips, p = 0.4865). C, Normalized synGCaMP6f increases induced by 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations in control or SphK1DN-expressing neurons. Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with black and red line as the averaged response of individual coverslips in control and SphK1DN group, respectively. D, Bar graph comparing peak synGCaMP6f values as shown in C demonstrates a defective Ca2+ signals by SphK1DN (control: n = 27 coverslips; SphK1DN: n = 27 coverslips). In addition, this SphK1DN-induced presynaptic Ca2+ reductions can be rescued by FTY720 application, independent of S1P1/S1P3 receptors (Fig. 7). *p < 0.05, unpaired two-tailed Student's t test.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Raw data for Ca2+ increases induced by single AP in control and SphK1DN-expressing neurons. A, Time courses of normalized synGCaMP6f increases induced by single AP in control neurons. Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with the black line as the averaged response of individual coverslips. As shown on top of the traces, peak Ca2+ signal induced by 1 AP from individual ROIs occurred within 110 ms, ranging from the first to 11th frame after stimulus as shown with color coded diagram (upper right). B, Color coded pie charts showing frame location distributions of Ca2+ peaks for all ROIs in coverslips “a” (left) and “b” (right). Along with each pie chart, two color coded traces from each coverslip showed representative ROIs with Ca2+ peaked at the fourth and sixth frame. C, Time courses of normalized synGCaMP6f increases induced by single AP in SphK1DN-expressing neurons. Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with the red line as the averaged response of individual coverslips. As shown on top of the traces, peak Ca2+ signal induced by 1 AP from individual ROIs occurred within 110 ms, ranging from the first to 11th frame after stimulus as shown with color coded diagram (upper right). D, Color coded pie charts showing frame location distributions of Ca2+ peaks from all ROIs in coverslips “a*” (left) and “b*” (right) from SphK1DN group. Along with each pie chart, two color coded traces from each coverslip showed representative ROIs with Ca2+ peaked at the second and seventh frame. E, Truncated (above) and full (below) time courses of mean synGCaMP6f signals induced by single AP of coverslip “a” or “b” from control group, with decay phases fitted by single exponential functions (dotted gray lines). F, Truncated (above) and full (below) time courses of mean synGCaMP6f signals induced by single AP of coverslip “a*” or “b*” from SphK1DN group, with decay phases of each mean Ca2+ signal fitted by single exponential functions (dotted gray lines).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

FTY720 rescues presynaptic Ca2+ increase in response to prolonged stimulations in SphK1DN-expressing neurons, independent of S1P1/S1P3 receptors. A, Normalized synGCaMP6f increases induced by 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations in SphK1DN-expressing neurons under variable conditions (control, FTY720, or FTY720/W146/CAY10444). Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with red, blue, and yellow line as the averaged response of individual coverslips from control, FTY720, and FTY720/W146/CAY10444 group, respectively. B, Bar graph comparing peak synGCaMP6f values as shown in A demonstrates that FTY720 treatment increases Ca2+ influx in SphK1DN-expressing neurons, which is not affected by the pretreatment of S1PR inhibitors (control: n = 22 coverslips; FTY720: n = 20 coverslips; FTY720/W146/CAY10444: n = 20 coverslips). All experiments are performed in synapses expressing the SphK1DN mutant, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test: FTY720 versus control (***p < 0.001); FTY720 and S1PR inhibitors versus FTY720 (p = 0.4651; ns: not statistically significant).

S1P modulates presynaptic Ca2+ levels via TRPC5 channels

It is reported that the TRPC5 channel, a Ca2+ permeable member of canonical transient receptor potential channel (TRPC) superfamily (Clapham, 2003; Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007), is located to presynaptic terminals (Greka et al., 2003; Nichols et al., 2007; Schwarz et al., 2019). Additionally, TRPC5 channels may be involved in maintaining presynaptic Ca2+ levels during stimulation trains (Schwarz et al., 2019). Notably, S1P is a physiological agonist for Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 channels (Xu et al., 2006; Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007; Naylor et al., 2016). It is therefore possible that the regulation of TRPC5 by the SphK1/S1P axis may account for the SphK1DN induced presynaptic Ca2+ defect during prolonged stimulations we have observed (Fig. 5C,D). We next explored this possibility by examining effects of SphK1DN on presynaptic Ca2+ levels in neurons expressing a dominant negative nonconducting TRPC5 (TRPC5DN), which was created by site-specific mutagenesis of WT TRPC5 (TRPC5WT; LFW-AAA) as reported (Greka et al., 2003). The nonconducting and dominant negative properties of this TRPC5DN channel was confirmed by whole-cell patch recordings in HEK 293 cells (Fig. 8A,B). Furthermore, ionic currents of TRPCWT channels were significantly enhanced by exogenously applied S1P (p < 0.001; Fig. 8G,H), confirming the S1P-mediated regulation of TRPC5 as reported by previous Ca2+ imaging studies (Xu et al., 2006; Naylor et al., 2016). Consistent with a previous study on hippocampal neurons using transgenic knock-out (KO) and knock-in mice (Schwarz et al., 2019), TRPC5DN induced a significant decrease in presynaptic Ca2+ levels in response to 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations (p < 0.05; Fig. 8E,F) rather than single AP stimulation (p > 0.05; Figs. 8C,D, 9), implying an importance of TRPC5 in maintaining presynaptic Ca2+ levels during prolonged stimulations. Moreover, in contrast to an inhibition of presynaptic Ca2+ influx in control neurons (Fig. 5C,D), SphK1DN had no obvious effects on presynaptic Ca2+ levels in response to 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (p > 0.05; Fig. 8I,J), pointing out that Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 channels may be critical for the role of the SphK1/S1P axis in presynaptic Ca2+ signaling during prolonged stimulations.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 is necessary for the action of the SphK1/S1P axis on presynaptic Ca2+ levels in responses to prolonged stimulations. A, Representative whole-cell currents recorded in HEK293 cells expressing TRPC5WT (black), TRPC5DN (green), or TRPC5DN and TRPC5WT (red), in response to a voltage ramp from −100 to +100 mV. B, Quantifications showing substantial reductions of whole-cell currents in cells expressing TRPC5DN or TRPC5DN/TRPC5WT, as compared with TRPC5WT, at both –100 and +100 mV (TRPC5WT: n = 16 cells; TRPC5DN: n = 18 cells; co-transfection: n = 15 cells; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test, TRPC5DN or TRPC5DN/TRPC5WT vs TRPC5WT: ***p < 0.001). C, Normalized increases of synGCaMP6f fluorescence induced by single AP in control or TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with black and red line as the averaged response of individual coverslips from control and TRPC5DN groups, respectively. Raw data for Ca2+ increases induced by single AP are presented in Figure 9. D, Bar graph comparing peak synGCaMP6f values as shown in C reveals no change in Ca2+ signals in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (control: n = 20 coverslips; TRPC5DN: n = 19 coverslips, p = 0.4639). E, Normalized SynGCaMP6f increases induced by 100 APs at 20 Hz in control or TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with black or red line as the averaged response of individual coverslips from control or TRPC5DN group. F, Bar graph comparing peak Ca2+ values as shown in E demonstrates a significant decrease of Ca2+ signals in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (control: n = 22 coverslips; SphK1DN: n = 22 coverslips). G, Representative whole-cell TRPC5 currents before (black) and after (red) 5 μm S1P application, recorded from a TRPC5WT-expressing HEK293 cell, in response to a voltage ramp from −100 to +100 mV. H, Quantifications showing significant increases of whole-cell TRPC5 currents by S1P application (red vs black) at both +100 mV (top) and −100 mV (bottom; n = 16 cells; paired t test, ***p < 0.001). I, Normalized fluorescence increases of SynGCaMP6f signals induced by 100 APs at 20 Hz from TRPC5DN or SphK1DN/TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with black or red line as the averaged response of individual coverslips from TRPC5DN or SphK1DN/TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. J, Bar graph comparing peak Ca2+values as shown in I demonstrates that SphK1DN had no significant effects on Ca2+ signals in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (TRPC5DN: n = 24 coverslips; SphK1DN/TRPC5DN: n = 24 coverslips, p = 0.4856). *p < 0.05, unpaired two-tailed Student's t test in D, F, and J.

Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.

Raw data for Ca2+ increases induced by single AP in control and TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. A, Time courses of normalized synGCaMP6f increases induced by single AP in control neurons. Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with the black line as the averaged response of individual coverslips. As shown on top of the traces, peak Ca2+ signal induced by 1 AP from individual ROIs occurred within 110 ms, ranging from the first to 11th frame after stimulus as shown with color coded diagram (upper right). B, Color coded pie charts showing frame location distributions of Ca2+ peaks for all ROIs in coverslips “c” (left) and “d” (right). Along with each pie chart, two color coded traces from each coverslip showed representative ROIs with Ca2+ peaked at the fourth and sixth frame. C, Time courses of normalized synGCaMP6f increases induced by single AP in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. Gray lines are mean fluorescence changes of individual ROIs from each coverslip, with the red line as the averaged response of individual coverslips. As shown on top of the traces, peak Ca2+ signal induced by 1 AP from individual ROIs occurred within 110 ms, ranging from the first to 11th frame after stimulus as shown with color coded diagram (upper right). D, Color coded pie charts showing frame location distributions of Ca2+ peaks from all ROIs in coverslips “c*” (left) and “d*” (right) from TRPC5DN group. Along with each pie chart, two color coded traces from each coverslip showed representative ROIs with Ca2+ peaked at the second and seventh frame. E, Truncated (above) and full (below) time courses of mean synGCaMP6f signals induced by single AP of coverslip “c” or “d” from control group, with decay phases of Ca2+ signals fitted by single exponential functions (dotted gray lines). F, Truncated (above) and full (below) time courses of mean synGCaMP6f signals induced by single AP of coverslip “c*” or “d*” from TRPC5DN group with decay phases of mean Ca2+ signals fitted by single exponential functions (dotted gray lines).

TRPC5 is critical for the role of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis

Consistent with critical roles of TRPC5 channels in mediating Ca2+ influx on train stimulations (Fig. 8E,F), TRPC5DN induced a significant increase in the time constant of sypHy signal decay (p < 0.05; Fig. 11A,B), implying an importance of Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 in synaptic vesicle endocytosis. On the other hand, there was no change in sypHy fluorescence increase induced by electric stimulations in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons as compared with control neurons (p > 0.05; Fig. 11C,D). We reasoned that any potential reductions in sypHy increase induced by TRPC5DN could be masked by a comparable reduction in endocytosis during stimulation, since a significant defect in synaptic vesicle endocytosis induced by TRPC5DN has been observed as shown in Figure 11A,B. Indeed, in the presence of bafilomycin to block vesicle reacidification because of endocytosis, TRPC5DN induced a small, although nonsignificant, reduction in the increase of pHluorin signals induced by 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations (p > 0.05; Fig. 10). Collectively, our data indicate that Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 may be specifically required for synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Given the dependence on Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 for the role of the SphK1/S1P axis in presynaptic Ca2+ levels (Fig. 8I,J), we then analyzed effects of SphK1DN on synaptic vesicle endocytosis in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. In contrast to an increase in the time constant of sypHy signal decay after the cessation of stimulations induced by SphK1DN expression in control neurons (Fig. 2A,B), SphK1DN induced no detectable changes in this parameter in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (Fig. 11E,F), indicating that Ca2+ via TRPC5 channels may be necessary for the SphK1/S1P axis-mediated action in synaptic vesicle endocytosis. However, similar as SphK1DN expression in control neurons (Fig. 1C,D), SphK1DN reduced the increase in pHluorin signals induced by 100 APs at 20 Hz in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (p < 0.001; Fig. 11G,H), indicating that the role of the SphK1/S1P axis in exocytosis may be independent of TRPC5. Taken together, our data point out that the regulation of TRPC5 channels by the SphK1/S1P axis may be especially crucial for synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons.

Figure 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 10.

TRPC5DN has no significant effect on synaptic vesicle exocytosis in neurons. A, In the presence of bafilomycin A1, time courses of averaged increases in the sypHy signals induced by 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations in control or TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. Fluorescence increases induced by electrical stimulations are normalized to that by NH4Cl to minimize potential impacts from sypHy expression variations. B, Bar graph showing comparable peak values of normalized fluorescence increases in control or TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (control: n = 143 boutons; TRPC5DN: n = 139 boutons; p = 0.1096). Unpaired two-tailed Student's t test. ns: not statistically significant.

Figure 11.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 11.

TRPC5 is required for the role of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons. A, Normalized changes of sypHy signals in response to 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations in control and TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. B, Bar graph showing an increase in the endocytic time constant in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (control: n = 163 boutons; TPRC5DN: n = 154 boutons). C, Time courses of averaged increases in the sypHy signals induced by 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations in control or TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. Fluorescence increases induced by electrical stimulations are normalized to that by NH4Cl perfusion at the end of each trial to minimize potential impacts of sypHy expression variations. The time constant (τ) of pHluorin signal decay for the averaged response of control or TRPC5DN group was obtained by fitting the fluorescence decay with a single exponential function (gray lines). D, Bar graph showing comparable peak values of normalized fluorescence increases in control or TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (control: n = 142 boutons; TRPC5DN: n = 118 boutons; p = 0.1002). In the presence of bafilomycin, TRRPC5DN induces a small, but nonsignificant, reduction in exocytosis (Fig. 10). E, Normalized changes of sypHy fluorescence in TRPC5DN or SphK1DN/TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. F, Bar graph showing that SphK1DN had no detectable effects on the endocytic time constant in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (TPRC5DN: n = 150 boutons; SphK1DN/TRPC5DN: n = 150 boutons, p = 0.6463). G, Time courses of averaged increases in the sypHy signals induced by a 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulation in TRPC5DN or SphK1DN/TRPC5DN-expressing neurons. Fluorescence increases induced by electrical stimulations are normalized to that by NH4Cl perfusion at the end of each trial. The time constant (τ) of pHluorin signal decay for the averaged response of TRPC5DN or SphK1DN/TRPC5DN group was obtained by fitting the fluorescence decay with a single exponential function (gray lines). H, Bar graph showing that SphK1DN causes a significant reduction of exocytosis in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (TRPC5DN: n = 115 boutons; SphK1DN/TRPC5DN: n = 113 boutons). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, unpaired two-tailed Student's t test.

Discussion

By showing an endocytic defect induced by SphK1DN (Fig. 2), we demonstrate an essential role of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons. This conclusion is reiterated by the evidence that the SphK1DN induced endocytic defect can be rescued by a clinical S1P analog FTY720 (Fig. 4C,D). Meanwhile, Ca2+ imaging shows that SphK1DN induces a decreased Ca2+ level during prolonged stimulations in control neurons (Fig. 5), indicating an importance of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis by regulating presynaptic Ca2+ signaling. Furthermore, SphK1DN induced no detectable effects on either presynaptic Ca2+ influx or synaptic vesicle endocytosis in TRPC5DN-expressing neurons, implying that Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 may be necessary for the SphK1/S1P axis-mediated action. Collectively, our data point out that regulations of Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 channels by the SphK1/S1P axis may be important for synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons. On the other hand, SphK1DN induces a defect in synaptic vesicle exocytosis (Fig. 1), which can also be rescued by exogenous FTY720 application (Fig. 4A,B), confirming critical roles of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle exocytosis as reported (Kajimoto et al., 2007; Chan et al., 2012; Riganti et al., 2016; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2019b). Moreover, this FTY720-mediated rescue is abolished by S1P receptor inhibitors (Fig. 4A,B), suggesting that S1P receptors may be responsible for the action of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle exocytosis in neurons. In view of different downstream molecular pathways identified in our study, the SphK1/S1P axis is inferred to regulate synaptic vesicle exocytosis and endocytosis through distinct mechanisms.

The SphK1/S1P axis regulates RRP during exocytosis

Our data showed that synaptic vesicle exocytosis induced by 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations is reduced by SphK1DN (Fig. 1C–F), indicating a role of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle exocytosis. This conclusion agrees with previous studies in neurons from C. elegans (Chan et al., 2012), mouse neuroendocrine cells (Pan et al., 2006; Z.C. Jiang et al., 2019a) and hippocampal neurons (Kajimoto et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2010; Riganti et al., 2016), frog neuromuscular junctions (Brailoiu et al., 2002), and zona glomerulosa cells (Brizuela et al., 2007). It is acknowledged that two vesicle pools, TRP and RRP, are essential in determining the amount of exocytosis on stimulations (S.H. Kim and Ryan, 2010; Alabi and Tsien, 2012; Baumgart et al., 2015). Our imaging data reveal that SphK1DN reduces RRP size and slows down RRP replenishment (Fig. 1J–M) with no obvious effects on TRP size or its depletion kinetics (Fig. 1G–I), indicating a physiological role of the SphK1/S1P axis in regulating the size and replenishment of RRP during exocytosis. Consistently, a previous study implies that exogenous S1P addition may increase the size of RRP, measured as sucrose evoked EPSCs (Riganti et al., 2016). The RRP regulation by the SphK1/S1P axis may reflect its function in vesicle docking and priming, since FTY720 has been implied to affect docking/priming process in primary rat cultured astrocytes, a non-neuronal cell (Trkov et al., 2012). Alternatively, the SphK1/S1P may control RRP by modulating localization of synapsin I (Riganti et al., 2016), a major synaptic vesicle associated phosphoprotein regulating RRP size (Baldelli et al., 2007).

The SphK1/S1P axis promotes vesicle endocytosis in neuronal cells

By showing that SphK1DN slowed down sypHy fluorescence decay after the cessation of stimulations at both room and physiological temperatures (Fig. 2), our data provide the first evidence for critical roles of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons. Additionally, single vesicle endocytosis monitored using cell-attached capacitance recordings in chromaffin cells reveals an importance of the SphK1/S1P axis in vesicle fission during endocytosis (Fig. 3). Our findings thus expand the reported roles of the SphK1/S1P axis in endocytic trafficking in non-neuronal cells (Yonamine et al., 2011; Shen et al., 2014; Young et al., 2016; Lima et al., 2017) to neuronal endocytosis. Based on the documented importance of endocytosis for the synaptic vesicle reavailability in RRP (Pyle et al., 2000; Granseth and Lagnado, 2008; Cheung et al., 2010; Rizzoli, 2014; Kyung et al., 2018; Y. Kim et al., 2020), the role of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis may account for the SphK1DN-induced disruption in RRP replenishment we have observed (Fig. 1L,M).

The regulation of TRPC5 by the SphK1/S1P axis is critical for synaptic vesicle endocytosis

TRPC5DN reduced Ca2+ increase induced by 100 APs at 20 Hz (Fig. 8E,F) rather than single AP (Fig. 8C,D), suggesting critical roles of TRPC5 in presynaptic Ca2+ signaling during prolonged stimulations. Our results are in line with a previous study using transgenic KO and knock-in mice, demonstrating an importance of TRPC5 channels, independent of VGCCs, in presynaptic Ca2+ influx during stimulation trains (Schwarz et al., 2019). Furthermore, TRPC5DN slowed down sypHy signal decay after stimulations (Fig. 11A,B), indicating that Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 channels may be critical for synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons. It is of note that previous studies have identified that Ca2+ influx via TRPM7 (Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021), another TRP superfamily member (Clapham, 2003), and Flower (C.K. Yao et al., 2017), a Ca2+ permeable protein with Ca2+ selectivity filter similar as TRPV5 and TRPV6 (C.K. Yao et al., 2009), may be crucial for synaptic vesicle endocytosis in mammalian neurons. Along this line, it would be interesting to find out the importance of other members of TRP superfamily, which are Ca2+ permeable and widely expressed in the brain (Ramsey et al., 2006; Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007; Sawamura et al., 2017; Koivisto et al., 2022), in synaptic vesicle endocytosis in the mammalian brain. On the other hand, Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 has been previously shown to be important for short-term plasticity of fast glutamatergic synapses (Schwarz et al., 2019). Given the well-established significance of synaptic vesicle endocytosis in short-term synaptic plasticity (Zucker and Regehr, 2002; Granseth and Lagnado, 2008; Hosoi et al., 2009; Regehr, 2012; Y. Hua et al., 2013; Z.J. Jiang et al., 2021), our discovery suggests that the previously reported functions of TRPC5 in short-term plasticity may reflect its role in synaptic vesicle endocytosis in neurons.

The present study using electrophysiological recordings and previous Ca2+ imaging assays in HEK293 cells have testified the role of S1P as a physiological activator for TRPC5 channels (Xu et al., 2006; Naylor et al., 2016). Our Ca2+ imaging studies in neurons shows that SphK1DN induces a reduction in presynaptic synGCaMP6f signal increase in response to 100 APs at 20-Hz stimulations in control (Fig. 5C,D) but not TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (Fig. 8I,J), indicating that the SphK1/S1P axis may be crucial for presynaptic Ca2+ signaling via regulating TRPC5 channels during prolonged stimulations. This finding is likely to provide novel mechanistic insights into the role of S1P, an enigmatic signaling molecule, in Ca2+ homeostasis in the mammalian brain (Spiegel and Milstien, 2003; Karunakaran and van Echten-Deckert, 2017). In parallel, SphK1DN slows down sypHy fluorescence decay after the cessation of stimulations in control (Fig. 2A,B) but not TRPC5DN-expressing neurons (Fig. 11E,F), indicating an importance of TRPC5 in the SphK1/S1P axis-mediated regulation of synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Collectively, our data point out regulations of Ca2+ influx via TRPC5 by the SphK1/S1P axis may be critical for synaptic vesicle endocytosis. This discovery may thus provide novel mechanistic implications for parallel involvements of TRPC5 and S1P in brain functions under physiological and pathologic conditions and pain-related behaviors in mice and human (Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013; Hong et al., 2015, 2020; Weth-Malsch et al., 2016; Bröker-Lai et al., 2017; Di Pardo et al., 2017; Karunakaran and van Echten-Deckert, 2017; Hill et al., 2018; Sadler et al., 2021).

Implications to neurologic disorders

The SphK1/S1P axis and synaptic vesicle endocytosis have been linked to the same group of neurologic disorders, including Parkinson's disease (Pyszko and Strosznajder, 2014), Huntington's disease (Di Pardo et al., 2019), Alzheimer's disease (Ceccom et al., 2014; Couttas et al., 2014), and multiple sclerosis (Subei and Cohen, 2015; Mao-Draayer et al., 2017). By identifying for the first time a role of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis, our study indicates that impaired regulations of the SphK1/S1P axis in synaptic vesicle endocytosis may contribute to pathophysiological mechanisms of these neurologic disorders (Couttas et al., 2014; Pirhaji et al., 2016; Schreij et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2018; Di Pardo et al., 2019; McAdam et al., 2020; Pensalfini et al., 2020). Meanwhile, it is worth mentioning that the SphK1/S1P axis has recently been identified as a key regulator for autophagy in neurons (Moruno Manchon et al., 2015, 2016), and dysfunction of autophagy is identified in many neurologic diseases (Menzies et al., 2017; Malik et al., 2019; Klionsky et al., 2021). Indeed, there is an interdependency of autophagy and synaptic vesicle endocytosis within presynaptic terminals (Limanaqi et al., 2018; Overhoff et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2022). As the SphK1/S1P axis may modulate the coordination between autophagy and endocytic membrane trafficking in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Young et al., 2016), it would be interesting to understand whether the SphK1/S1P axis may regulate the interplay between autophagy and synaptic vesicle endocytosis within presynaptic terminals in the future.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01NS110533 (to L.-W.G.). We thank Dr. L. Lagnado for sypHy and Dr. T. A. Ryan for SynGCaMP6f.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Liang-Wei Gong at lwgong{at}uic.edu

SfN exclusive license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alabi AA,
    2. Tsien RW
    (2012) Synaptic vesicle pools and dynamics. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a013680. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a013680 pmid:22745285
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Alemany R,
    2. van Koppen CJ,
    3. Danneberg K,
    4. Ter Braak M,
    5. Meyer Zu Heringdorf D
    (2007) Regulation and functional roles of sphingosine kinases. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 374:413–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-007-0132-3 pmid:17242884
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ali R,
    2. Nicholas RS,
    3. Muraro PA
    (2013) Drugs in development for relapsing multiple sclerosis. Drugs 73:625–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-013-0030-6 pmid:23609782
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Alsaqati M,
    2. Thomas RS,
    3. Kidd EJ
    (2018) Proteins involved in endocytosis are upregulated by ageing in the normal human brain: implications for the development of Alzheimer's disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 73:289–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glx135 pmid:28655199
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Ammar MR,
    2. Kassas N,
    3. Chasserot-Golaz S,
    4. Bader MF,
    5. Vitale N
    (2013) Lipids in regulated exocytosis: what are they doing? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 4:125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2013.00125 pmid:24062727
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Balaji J,
    2. Ryan TA
    (2007) Single-vesicle imaging reveals that synaptic vesicle exocytosis and endocytosis are coupled by a single stochastic mode. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20576–20581. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707574105 pmid:18077369
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Baldelli P,
    2. Fassio A,
    3. Valtorta F,
    4. Benfenati F
    (2007) Lack of synapsin I reduces the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles at central inhibitory synapses. J Neurosci 27:13520–13531. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3151-07.2007 pmid:18057210
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Barron JC,
    2. Hurley EP,
    3. Parsons MP
    (2021) Huntingtin and the Synapse. Front Cell Neurosci 15:689332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2021.689332 pmid:34211373
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Bassani S,
    2. Cingolani LA,
    3. Valnegri P,
    4. Folci A,
    5. Zapata J,
    6. Gianfelice A,
    7. Sala C,
    8. Goda Y,
    9. Passafaro M
    (2012) The X-linked intellectual disability protein TSPAN7 regulates excitatory synapse development and AMPAR trafficking. Neuron 73:1143–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.021 pmid:22445342
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Baumgart JP,
    2. Zhou ZY,
    3. Hara M,
    4. Cook DC,
    5. Hoppa MB,
    6. Ryan TA,
    7. Hemmings HC Jr.
    (2015) Isoflurane inhibits synaptic vesicle exocytosis through reduced Ca2+ influx, not Ca2+-exocytosis coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:11959–11964. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500525112 pmid:26351670
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Blair NT,
    2. Kaczmarek JS,
    3. Clapham DE
    (2009) Intracellular calcium strongly potentiates agonist-activated TRPC5 channels. J Gen Physiol 133:525–546. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200810153 pmid:19398778
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Bolte S,
    2. Cordelières FP
    (2006) A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J Microsc 224:213–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x pmid:17210054
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Bonhoure E,
    2. Pchejetski D,
    3. Aouali N,
    4. Morjani H,
    5. Levade T,
    6. Kohama T,
    7. Cuvillier O
    (2006) Overcoming MDR-associated chemoresistance in HL-60 acute myeloid leukemia cells by targeting sphingosine kinase-1. Leukemia 20:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404023 pmid:16281067
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Brailoiu E,
    2. Cooper RL,
    3. Dun NJ
    (2002) Sphingosine 1-phosphate enhances spontaneous transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. Br J Pharmacol 136:1093–1097. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704839 pmid:12163341
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Brizuela L,
    2. Rábano M,
    3. Gangoiti P,
    4. Narbona N,
    5. Macarulla JM,
    6. Trueba M,
    7. Gómez-Muñoz A
    (2007) Sphingosine-1-phosphate stimulates aldosterone secretion through a mechanism involving the PI3K/PKB and MEK/ERK 1/2 pathways. J Lipid Res 48:2264–2274. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M700291-JLR200 pmid:17609523
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Brockhaus J,
    2. Brüggen B,
    3. Missler M
    (2019) Imaging and analysis of presynaptic calcium influx in cultured neurons using synGCaMP6f. Front Synaptic Neurosci 11:12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2019.00012 pmid:31057389
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Bröker-Lai J,
    2. Kollewe A,
    3. Schindeldecker B,
    4. Pohle J,
    5. Nguyen Chi V,
    6. Mathar I,
    7. Guzman R,
    8. Schwarz Y,
    9. Lai A,
    10. Weißgerber P,
    11. Schwegler H,
    12. Dietrich A,
    13. Both M,
    14. Sprengel R,
    15. Draguhn A,
    16. Köhr G,
    17. Fakler B,
    18. Flockerzi V,
    19. Bruns D,
    20. Freichel M
    (2017) Heteromeric channels formed by TRPC1, TRPC4 and TRPC5 define hippocampal synaptic transmission and working memory. EMBO J 36:2770–2789. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201696369 pmid:28790178
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Bryan L,
    2. Kordula T,
    3. Spiegel S,
    4. Milstien S
    (2008) Regulation and functions of sphingosine kinases in the brain. Biochim Biophys Acta 1781:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.04.008 pmid:18485923
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Camprubí-Robles M,
    2. Mair N,
    3. Andratsch M,
    4. Benetti C,
    5. Beroukas D,
    6. Rukwied R,
    7. Langeslag M,
    8. Proia RL,
    9. Schmelz M,
    10. Ferrer Montiel AV,
    11. Haberberger RV,
    12. Kress M
    (2013) Sphingosine-1-phosphate-induced nociceptor excitation and ongoing pain behavior in mice and humans is largely mediated by S1P3 receptor. J Neurosci 33:2582–2592. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4479-12.2013 pmid:23392686
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Cataldo AM,
    2. Peterhoff CM,
    3. Troncoso JC,
    4. Gomez-Isla T,
    5. Hyman BT,
    6. Nixon RA
    (2000) Endocytic pathway abnormalities precede amyloid beta deposition in sporadic Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome: differential effects of APOE genotype and presenilin mutations. Am J Pathol 157:277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64538-5 pmid:10880397
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Ceccom J,
    2. Loukh N,
    3. Lauwers-Cances V,
    4. Touriol C,
    5. Nicaise Y,
    6. Gentil C,
    7. Uro-Coste E,
    8. Pitson S,
    9. Maurage CA,
    10. Duyckaerts C,
    11. Cuvillier O,
    12. Delisle MB
    (2014) Reduced sphingosine kinase-1 and enhanced sphingosine 1-phosphate lyase expression demonstrate deregulated sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-5960-2-12 pmid:24468113
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Chan JP,
    2. Hu Z,
    3. Sieburth D
    (2012) Recruitment of sphingosine kinase to presynaptic terminals by a conserved muscarinic signaling pathway promotes neurotransmitter release. Genes Dev 26:1070–1085. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.188003.112 pmid:22588719
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Chanaday NL,
    2. Cousin MA,
    3. Milosevic I,
    4. Watanabe S,
    5. Morgan JR
    (2019) The synaptic vesicle cycle revisited: new insights into the modes and mechanisms. J Neurosci 39:8209–8216. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1158-19.2019 pmid:31619489
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Chen TW,
    2. Wardill TJ,
    3. Sun Y,
    4. Pulver SR,
    5. Renninger SL,
    6. Baohan A,
    7. Schreiter ER,
    8. Kerr RA,
    9. Orger MB,
    10. Jayaraman V,
    11. Looger LL,
    12. Svoboda K,
    13. Kim DS
    (2013) Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12354 pmid:23868258
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Cheung G,
    2. Jupp OJ,
    3. Cousin MA
    (2010) Activity-dependent bulk endocytosis and clathrin-dependent endocytosis replenish specific synaptic vesicle pools in central nerve terminals. J Neurosci 30:8151–8161. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0293-10.2010 pmid:20554865
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Chiba K,
    2. Adachi K
    (2012) Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 as a useful target for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 5:514–528. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph5050514 pmid:24281561
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Clapham DE
    (2003) TRP channels as cellular sensors. Nature 426:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02196 pmid:14654832
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Cousin MA
    (2000) Synaptic vesicle endocytosis: calcium works overtime in the nerve terminal. Mol Neurobiol 22:115–128. https://doi.org/10.1385/MN:22:1-3:115 pmid:11414275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Couttas TA,
    2. Kain N,
    3. Daniels B,
    4. Lim XY,
    5. Shepherd C,
    6. Kril J,
    7. Pickford R,
    8. Li H,
    9. Garner B,
    10. Don AS
    (2014) Loss of the neuroprotective factor Sphingosine 1-phosphate early in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-5960-2-9 pmid:24456642
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Davare MA,
    2. Fortin DA,
    3. Saneyoshi T,
    4. Nygaard S,
    5. Kaech S,
    6. Banker G,
    7. Soderling TR,
    8. Wayman GA
    (2009) Transient receptor potential canonical 5 channels activate Ca2+/calmodulin kinase Igamma to promote axon formation in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 29:9794–9808. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1544-09.2009 pmid:19657032
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. de Juan-Sanz J,
    2. Holt GT,
    3. Schreiter ER,
    4. de Juan F,
    5. Kim DS,
    6. Ryan TA
    (2017) Axonal endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) content controls release probability in CNS nerve terminals. Neuron 93:867–881.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.010 pmid:28162809
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Dernick G,
    2. Gong LW,
    3. Tabares L,
    4. Alvarez de Toledo G,
    5. Lindau M
    (2005) Patch amperometry: high-resolution measurements of single-vesicle fusion and release. Nat Methods 2:699–708. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0905-699 pmid:16118641
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Di Menna L,
    2. Molinaro G,
    3. Di Nuzzo L,
    4. Riozzi B,
    5. Zappulla C,
    6. Pozzilli C,
    7. Turrini R,
    8. Caraci F,
    9. Copani A,
    10. Battaglia G,
    11. Nicoletti F,
    12. Bruno V
    (2013) Fingolimod protects cultured cortical neurons against excitotoxic death. Pharmacol Res 67:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2012.10.004 pmid:23073075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Di Pardo A,
    2. Maglione V
    (2018) Sphingolipid metabolism: a new therapeutic opportunity for brain degenerative disorders. Front Neurosci 12:249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00249 pmid:29719499
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Di Pardo A,
    2. Amico E,
    3. Basit A,
    4. Armirotti A,
    5. Joshi P,
    6. Neely MD,
    7. Vuono R,
    8. Castaldo S,
    9. Digilio AF,
    10. Scalabrì F,
    11. Pepe G,
    12. Elifani F,
    13. Madonna M,
    14. Jeong SK,
    15. Park BM,
    16. D'Esposito M,
    17. Bowman AB,
    18. Barker RA,
    19. Maglione V
    (2017) Defective Sphingosine-1-phosphate metabolism is a druggable target in Huntington's disease. Sci Rep 7:5280. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05709-y pmid:28706199
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Di Pardo A,
    2. Pepe G,
    3. Castaldo S,
    4. Marracino F,
    5. Capocci L,
    6. Amico E,
    7. Madonna M,
    8. Giova S,
    9. Jeong SK,
    10. Park BM,
    11. Park BD,
    12. Maglione V
    (2019) Stimulation of sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) is beneficial in a Huntington's disease pre-clinical model. Front Mol Neurosci 12:100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2019.00100 pmid:31068790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Edsall LC,
    2. Spiegel S
    (1999) Enzymatic measurement of sphingosine 1-phosphate. Anal Biochem 272:80–86. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1999.4157 pmid:10405296
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Fernández-Alfonso T,
    2. Ryan TA
    (2004) The kinetics of synaptic vesicle pool depletion at CNS synaptic terminals. Neuron 41:943–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00113-8 pmid:15046726
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Fukuda Y,
    2. Kihara A,
    3. Igarashi Y
    (2003) Distribution of sphingosine kinase activity in mouse tissues: contribution of SPHK1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 309:155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01551-1 pmid:12943676
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Ghasemi R,
    2. Dargahi L,
    3. Ahmadiani A
    (2016) Integrated sphingosine-1 phosphate signaling in the central nervous system: from physiological equilibrium to pathological damage. Pharmacol Res 104:156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2015.11.006 pmid:26772814
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Ghosh TK,
    2. Bian J,
    3. Gill DL
    (1990) Intracellular calcium release mediated by sphingosine derivatives generated in cells. Science 248:1653–1656. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2163543 pmid:2163543
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Gomez-Brouchet A,
    2. Pchejetski D,
    3. Brizuela L,
    4. Garcia V,
    5. Altié MF,
    6. Maddelein ML,
    7. Delisle MB,
    8. Cuvillier O
    (2007) Critical role for sphingosine kinase-1 in regulating survival of neuroblastoma cells exposed to amyloid-beta peptide. Mol Pharmacol 72:341–349. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.106.033738 pmid:17522181
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Gomis A,
    2. Soriano S,
    3. Belmonte C,
    4. Viana F
    (2008) Hypoosmotic- and pressure-induced membrane stretch activate TRPC5 channels. J Physiol 586:5633–5649. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.161257 pmid:18832422
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Gong LW,
    2. Di Paolo G,
    3. Diaz E,
    4. Cestra G,
    5. Diaz ME,
    6. Lindau M,
    7. De Camilli P,
    8. Toomre D
    (2005) Phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase type I gamma regulates dynamics of large dense-core vesicle fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:5204–5209. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501412102 pmid:15793002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Granseth B,
    2. Lagnado L
    (2008) The role of endocytosis in regulating the strength of hippocampal synapses. J Physiol 586:5969–5982. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.159715 pmid:19001048
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Granseth B,
    2. Odermatt B,
    3. Royle SJ,
    4. Lagnado L
    (2006) Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is the dominant mechanism of vesicle retrieval at hippocampal synapses. Neuron 51:773–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.029 pmid:16982422
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Greka A,
    2. Navarro B,
    3. Oancea E,
    4. Duggan A,
    5. Clapham DE
    (2003) TRPC5 is a regulator of hippocampal neurite length and growth cone morphology. Nat Neurosci 6:837–845. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1092 pmid:12858178
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Griggs RB,
    2. Nguyen DVM,
    3. Yermakov LM,
    4. Jaber JM,
    5. Shelby JN,
    6. Steinbrunner JK,
    7. Miller JA,
    8. Gonzalez-Islas C,
    9. Wenner P,
    10. Susuki K
    (2021) The type 2 diabetes factor methylglyoxal mediates axon initial segment shortening and alters neuronal function at the cellular and network levels. eNeuro 8:ENEURO.0201-21.2021. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0201-21.2021
  49. ↵
    1. Haucke V,
    2. Neher E,
    3. Sigrist SJ
    (2011) Protein scaffolds in the coupling of synaptic exocytosis and endocytosis. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2948 pmid:21304549
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Helbig I, et al
    . (2019) A recurrent missense variant in AP2M1 impairs Clathrin-mediated endocytosis and causes developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Am J Hum Genet 104:1060–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.04.001 pmid:31104773
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Hill RZ,
    2. Hoffman BU,
    3. Morita T,
    4. Campos SM,
    5. Lumpkin EA,
    6. Brem RB,
    7. Bautista DM
    (2018) The signaling lipid sphingosine 1-phosphate regulates mechanical pain. Elife 7:e33285. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Hong C,
    2. Seo H,
    3. Kwak M,
    4. Jeon J,
    5. Jang J,
    6. Jeong EM,
    7. Myeong J,
    8. Hwang YJ,
    9. Ha K,
    10. Kang MJ,
    11. Lee KP,
    12. Yi EC,
    13. Kim IG,
    14. Jeon JH,
    15. Ryu H,
    16. So I
    (2015) Increased TRPC5 glutathionylation contributes to striatal neuron loss in Huntington's disease. Brain 138:3030–3047. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv188 pmid:26133660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Hong C,
    2. Jeong B,
    3. Park HJ,
    4. Chung JY,
    5. Lee JE,
    6. Kim J,
    7. Shin YC,
    8. So I
    (2020) TRP channels as emerging therapeutic targets for neurodegenerative diseases. Front Physiol 11:238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00238 pmid:32351395
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Hosoi N,
    2. Holt M,
    3. Sakaba T
    (2009) Calcium dependence of exo- and endocytotic coupling at a glutamatergic synapse. Neuron 63:216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.010 pmid:19640480
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Hua Y,
    2. Woehler A,
    3. Kahms M,
    4. Haucke V,
    5. Neher E,
    6. Klingauf J
    (2013) Blocking endocytosis enhances short-term synaptic depression under conditions of normal availability of vesicles. Neuron 80:343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.010 pmid:24139039
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Hua Z,
    2. Leal-Ortiz S,
    3. Foss SM,
    4. Waites CL,
    5. Garner CC,
    6. Voglmaier SM,
    7. Edwards RH
    (2011) v-SNARE composition distinguishes synaptic vesicle pools. Neuron 71:474–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.010 pmid:21835344
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Itagaki K,
    2. Hauser CJ
    (2003) Sphingosine 1-phosphate, a diffusible calcium influx factor mediating store-operated calcium entry. J Biol Chem 278:27540–27547. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M301763200 pmid:12746430
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Jiang ZC,
    2. Chen XJ,
    3. Zhou Q,
    4. Gong XH,
    5. Chen X,
    6. Wu WJ
    (2019a) Downregulated LRRK2 gene expression inhibits proliferation and migration while promoting the apoptosis of thyroid cancer cells by inhibiting activation of the JNK signaling pathway. Int J Oncol 55:21–34. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2019.4816
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Jiang ZJ,
    2. Delaney TL,
    3. Zanin MP,
    4. Haberberger RV,
    5. Pitson SM,
    6. Huang J,
    7. Alford S,
    8. Cologna SM,
    9. Keating DJ,
    10. Gong LW
    (2019b) Extracellular and intracellular sphingosine-1-phosphate distinctly regulates exocytosis in chromaffin cells. J Neurochem 149:729–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14703 pmid:30963576
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Jiang ZJ,
    2. Li W,
    3. Yao LH,
    4. Saed B,
    5. Rao Y,
    6. Grewe BS,
    7. McGinley A,
    8. Varga K,
    9. Alford S,
    10. Hu YS,
    11. Gong LW
    (2021) TRPM7 is critical for short-term synaptic depression by regulating synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Elife 10:e66709. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66709
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Kajimoto T,
    2. Okada T,
    3. Yu H,
    4. Goparaju SK,
    5. Jahangeer S,
    6. Nakamura S
    (2007) Involvement of sphingosine-1-phosphate in glutamate secretion in hippocampal neurons. Mol Cell Biol 27:3429–3440. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01465-06 pmid:17325039
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Kaksonen M,
    2. Roux A
    (2018) Mechanisms of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19:313–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.132 pmid:29410531
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Kanno T,
    2. Nishizaki T
    (2011) Endogenous sphingosine 1-phosphate regulates spontaneous glutamate release from mossy fiber terminals via S1P(3) receptors. Life Sci 89:137–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2011.05.021 pmid:21683714
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Kanno T,
    2. Nishizaki T,
    3. Proia RL,
    4. Kajimoto T,
    5. Jahangeer S,
    6. Okada T,
    7. Nakamura S
    (2010) Regulation of synaptic strength by sphingosine 1-phosphate in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 171:973–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.10.021 pmid:20950672
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Karunakaran I,
    2. van Echten-Deckert G
    (2017) Sphingosine 1-phosphate - a double edged sword in the brain. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1859:1573–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.03.008 pmid:28315304
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Kempf A,
    2. Tews B,
    3. Arzt ME,
    4. Weinmann O,
    5. Obermair FJ,
    6. Pernet V,
    7. Zagrebelsky M,
    8. Delekate A,
    9. Iobbi C,
    10. Zemmar A,
    11. Ristic Z,
    12. Gullo M,
    13. Spies P,
    14. Dodd D,
    15. Gygax D,
    16. Korte M,
    17. Schwab ME
    (2014) The sphingolipid receptor S1PR2 is a receptor for Nogo-a repressing synaptic plasticity. PLoS Biol 12:e1001763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001763 pmid:24453941
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Kesharwani A,
    2. Schwarz K,
    3. Dembla E,
    4. Dembla M,
    5. Schmitz F
    (2021) Early changes in Exo- and endocytosis in the EAE mouse model of multiple sclerosis correlate with decreased synaptic ribbon size and reduced ribbon-associated vesicle pools in rod photoreceptor synapses. Int J Mol Sci 22:10789.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Kim SH,
    2. Ryan TA
    (2010) CDK5 serves as a major control point in neurotransmitter release. Neuron 67:797–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.003 pmid:20826311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Kim SH,
    2. Ryan TA
    (2013) Balance of calcineurin Aα and CDK5 activities sets release probability at nerve terminals. J Neurosci 33:8937–8950. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4288-12.2013 pmid:23699505
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Kim Y,
    2. Lee U,
    3. Choi C,
    4. Chang S
    (2020) Release mode dynamically regulates the RRP refilling mechanism at individual hippocampal synapses. J Neurosci 40:8426–8437. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3029-19.2020 pmid:32989096
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Klionsky DJ, et al
    . (2021) Autophagy in major human diseases. EMBO J 40:e108863. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2021108863 pmid:34459017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Koide Y,
    2. Hasegawa T,
    3. Takahashi A,
    4. Endo A,
    5. Mochizuki N,
    6. Nakagawa M,
    7. Nishida A
    (2002) Development of novel EDG3 antagonists using a 3D database search and their structure-activity relationships. J Med Chem 45:4629–4638. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm020080c pmid:12361389
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Koivisto AP,
    2. Belvisi MG,
    3. Gaudet R,
    4. Szallasi A
    (2022) Advances in TRP channel drug discovery: from target validation to clinical studies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 21:41–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00268-4 pmid:34526696
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Kononenko NL,
    2. Haucke V
    (2015) Molecular mechanisms of presynaptic membrane retrieval and synaptic vesicle reformation. Neuron 85:484–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.016 pmid:25654254
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Kyung JW,
    2. Cho IH,
    3. Lee S,
    4. Song WK,
    5. Ryan TA,
    6. Hoppa MB,
    7. Kim SH
    (2017) Adaptor protein 2 (AP-2) complex is essential for functional axogenesis in hippocampal neurons. Sci Rep 7:41620. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41620 pmid:28139716
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Kyung JW,
    2. Kim JM,
    3. Lee W,
    4. Ha TY,
    5. Cha SH,
    6. Chung KH,
    7. Choi DJ,
    8. Jou I,
    9. Song WK,
    10. Joe EH,
    11. Kim SH,
    12. Park SM
    (2018) DJ-1 deficiency impairs synaptic vesicle endocytosis and reavailability at nerve terminals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:1629–1634. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708754115 pmid:29386384
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Lan T,
    2. Liu W,
    3. Xie X,
    4. Xu S,
    5. Huang K,
    6. Peng J,
    7. Shen X,
    8. Liu P,
    9. Wang L,
    10. Xia P,
    11. Huang H
    (2011) Sphingosine kinase-1 pathway mediates high glucose-induced fibronectin expression in glomerular mesangial cells. Mol Endocrinol 25:2094–2105. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2011-0095 pmid:21998146
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Lee JY,
    2. Han SH,
    3. Park MH,
    4. Baek B,
    5. Song IS,
    6. Choi MK,
    7. Takuwa Y,
    8. Ryu H,
    9. Kim SH,
    10. He X,
    11. Schuchman EH,
    12. Bae JS,
    13. Jin HK
    (2018) Neuronal SphK1 acetylates COX2 and contributes to pathogenesis in a model of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Commun 9:1479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03674-2 pmid:29662056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Burrone J,
    3. Tyler WJ,
    4. Hartman KN,
    5. Albeanu DF,
    6. Murthy VN
    (2005) Synaptic vesicle recycling studied in transgenic mice expressing synaptopHluorin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:6131–6136. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501145102 pmid:15837917
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Lima S,
    2. Milstien S,
    3. Spiegel S
    (2017) Sphingosine and sphingosine kinase 1 involvement in endocytic membrane trafficking. J Biol Chem 292:3074–3088. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.762377 pmid:28049734
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Limanaqi F,
    2. Biagioni F,
    3. Gambardella S,
    4. Ryskalin L,
    5. Fornai F
    (2018) Interdependency between autophagy and synaptic vesicle trafficking: implications for dopamine release. Front Mol Neurosci 11:299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2018.00299 pmid:30186112
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Malik BR,
    2. Maddison DC,
    3. Smith GA,
    4. Peters OM
    (2019) Autophagic and endo-lysosomal dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease. Mol Brain 12:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-019-0504-x pmid:31783880
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Mao-Draayer Y,
    2. Sarazin J,
    3. Fox D,
    4. Schiopu E
    (2017) The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor: a novel therapeutic target for multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases. Clin Immunol 175:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2016.11.008 pmid:27890706
    OpenUrlPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. McAdam RL,
    2. Morton A,
    3. Gordon SL,
    4. Alterman JF,
    5. Khvorova A,
    6. Cousin MA,
    7. Smillie KJ
    (2020) Loss of huntingtin function slows synaptic vesicle endocytosis in striatal neurons from the htt(Q140/Q140) mouse model of Huntington's disease. Neurobiol Dis 134:104637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104637 pmid:31614197
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Menzies FM, et al
    . (2017) Autophagy and neurodegeneration: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Neuron 93:1015–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.022 pmid:28279350
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Mizugishi K,
    2. Yamashita T,
    3. Olivera A,
    4. Miller GF,
    5. Spiegel S,
    6. Proia RL
    (2005) Essential role for sphingosine kinases in neural and vascular development. Mol Cell Biol 25:11113–11121. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.24.11113-11121.2005 pmid:16314531
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. ↵
    1. Moruno Manchon JF,
    2. Uzor NE,
    3. Dabaghian Y,
    4. Furr-Stimming EE,
    5. Finkbeiner S,
    6. Tsvetkov AS
    (2015) Cytoplasmic sphingosine-1-phosphate pathway modulates neuronal autophagy. Sci Rep 5:15213. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15213 pmid:26477494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Moruno Manchon JF,
    2. Uzor NE,
    3. Finkbeiner S,
    4. Tsvetkov AS
    (2016) SPHK1/sphingosine kinase 1-mediated autophagy differs between neurons and SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Autophagy 12:1418–1424. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2016.1183082 pmid:27467777
    OpenUrlPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Murthy VN,
    2. Stevens CF
    (1999) Reversal of synaptic vesicle docking at central synapses. Nat Neurosci 2:503–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/9149 pmid:10448213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Nawalpuri B,
    2. Sharma A,
    3. Chattarji S,
    4. Muddashetty RS
    (2021) Distinct temporal expression of the GW182 paralog TNRC6A in neurons regulates dendritic arborization. J Cell Sci 134:jcs258465.
    OpenUrl
  91. ↵
    1. Naylor J,
    2. Minard A,
    3. Gaunt HJ,
    4. Amer MS,
    5. Wilson LA,
    6. Migliore M,
    7. Cheung SY,
    8. Rubaiy HN,
    9. Blythe NM,
    10. Musialowski KE,
    11. Ludlow MJ,
    12. Evans WD,
    13. Green BL,
    14. Yang H,
    15. You Y,
    16. Li J,
    17. Fishwick CW,
    18. Muraki K,
    19. Beech DJ,
    20. Bon RS
    (2016) Natural and synthetic flavonoid modulation of TRPC5 channels. Br J Pharmacol 173:562–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13387 pmid:26565375
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Nichols RA,
    2. Dengler AF,
    3. Nakagawa EM,
    4. Bashkin M,
    5. Paul BT,
    6. Wu J,
    7. Khan GM
    (2007) A constitutive, transient receptor potential-like Ca2+ influx pathway in presynaptic nerve endings independent of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and Na+/Ca2+ exchange. J Biol Chem 282:36102–36111. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M706002200 pmid:17928293
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. ↵
    1. Nofer JR,
    2. Bot M,
    3. Brodde M,
    4. Taylor PJ,
    5. Salm P,
    6. Brinkmann V,
    7. van Berkel T,
    8. Assmann G,
    9. Biessen EA
    (2007) FTY720, a synthetic sphingosine 1 phosphate analogue, inhibits development of atherosclerosis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Circulation 115:501–508. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.641407 pmid:17242282
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. ↵
    1. Overhoff M,
    2. De Bruyckere E,
    3. Kononenko NL
    (2021) Mechanisms of neuronal survival safeguarded by endocytosis and autophagy. J Neurochem 157:263–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.15194 pmid:32964462
    OpenUrlPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Pan CY,
    2. Lee H,
    3. Chen CL
    (2006) Lysophospholipids elevate [Ca2+]i and trigger exocytosis in bovine chromaffin cells. Neuropharmacology 51:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.02.009 pmid:16616768
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Pensalfini A,
    2. Kim S,
    3. Subbanna S,
    4. Bleiwas C,
    5. Goulbourne CN,
    6. Stavrides PH,
    7. Jiang Y,
    8. Lee JH,
    9. Darji S,
    10. Pawlik M,
    11. Huo C,
    12. Peddy J,
    13. Berg MJ,
    14. Smiley JF,
    15. Basavarajappa BS,
    16. Nixon RA
    (2020) Endosomal dysfunction induced by directly overactivating Rab5 recapitulates prodromal and neurodegenerative features of Alzheimer's disease. Cell Rep 33:108420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108420 pmid:33238112
    OpenUrlPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Pirhaji L,
    2. Milani P,
    3. Leidl M,
    4. Curran T,
    5. Avila-Pacheco J,
    6. Clish CB,
    7. White FM,
    8. Saghatelian A,
    9. Fraenkel E
    (2016) Revealing disease-associated pathways by network integration of untargeted metabolomics. Nat Methods 13:770–776. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3940 pmid:27479327
    OpenUrlPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Pitson SM,
    2. Moretti PA,
    3. Zebol JR,
    4. Xia P,
    5. Gamble JR,
    6. Vadas MA,
    7. D'Andrea RJ,
    8. Wattenberg BW
    (2000) Expression of a catalytically inactive sphingosine kinase mutant blocks agonist-induced sphingosine kinase activation. A dominant-negative sphingosine kinase. J Biol Chem 275:33945–33950. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M006176200 pmid:10944534
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  99. ↵
    1. Pitson SM,
    2. Moretti PA,
    3. Zebol JR,
    4. Zareie R,
    5. Derian CK,
    6. Darrow AL,
    7. Qi J,
    8. D'Andrea RJ,
    9. Bagley CJ,
    10. Vadas MA,
    11. Wattenberg BW
    (2002) The nucleotide-binding site of human sphingosine kinase 1. J Biol Chem 277:49545–49553. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M206687200 pmid:12393916
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  100. ↵
    1. Puram SV,
    2. Riccio A,
    3. Koirala S,
    4. Ikeuchi Y,
    5. Kim AH,
    6. Corfas G,
    7. Bonni A
    (2011) A TRPC5-regulated calcium signaling pathway controls dendrite patterning in the mammalian brain. Genes Dev 25:2659–2673. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.174060.111 pmid:22135323
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  101. ↵
    1. Pyle JL,
    2. Kavalali ET,
    3. Piedras-Rentería ES,
    4. Tsien RW
    (2000) Rapid reuse of readily releasable pool vesicles at hippocampal synapses. Neuron 28:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00098-2 pmid:11086996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    1. Pyne NJ,
    2. Pyne S
    (2011) Selectivity and specificity of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor ligands: “off-targets” or complex pharmacology? Front Pharmacol 2:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2011.00026 pmid:21687518
    OpenUrlPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Pyszko JA,
    2. Strosznajder JB
    (2014) The key role of sphingosine kinases in the molecular mechanism of neuronal cell survival and death in an experimental model of Parkinson's disease. Folia Neuropathol 52:260–269. https://doi.org/10.5114/fn.2014.45567 pmid:25310737
    OpenUrlPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Qi Y,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Chen J,
    4. Dai L,
    5. Kaczorowski D,
    6. Gao X,
    7. Xia P
    (2015) Sphingosine kinase 1 protects hepatocytes from lipotoxicity via down-regulation of IRE1α protein expression. J Biol Chem 290:23282–23290. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.677542 pmid:26240153
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  105. ↵
    1. Ramsey IS,
    2. Delling M,
    3. Clapham DE
    (2006) An introduction to TRP channels. Annu Rev Physiol 68:619–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040204.100431 pmid:16460286
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Regehr WG
    (2012) Short-term presynaptic plasticity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a005702. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005702 pmid:22751149
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  107. ↵
    1. Rennick JJ,
    2. Johnston APR,
    3. Parton RG
    (2021) Key principles and methods for studying the endocytosis of biological and nanoparticle therapeutics. Nat Nanotechnol 16:266–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00858-8 pmid:33712737
    OpenUrlPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Ribeiro LF,
    2. Verpoort B,
    3. Nys J,
    4. Vennekens KM,
    5. Wierda KD,
    6. de Wit J
    (2019) SorCS1-mediated sorting in dendrites maintains neurexin axonal surface polarization required for synaptic function. PLoS Biol 17:e3000466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000466 pmid:31658245
    OpenUrlPubMed
  109. ↵
    1. Riganti L,
    2. Antonucci F,
    3. Gabrielli M,
    4. Prada I,
    5. Giussani P,
    6. Viani P,
    7. Valtorta F,
    8. Menna E,
    9. Matteoli M,
    10. Verderio C
    (2016) Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) impacts presynaptic functions by regulating synapsin I localization in the presynaptic compartment. J Neurosci 36:4624–4634. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3588-15.2016 pmid:27098703
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  110. ↵
    1. Rizzoli SO
    (2014) Synaptic vesicle recycling: steps and principles. EMBO J 33:788–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/embj.201386357 pmid:24596248
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. ↵
    1. Royle SJ,
    2. Granseth B,
    3. Odermatt B,
    4. Derevier A,
    5. Lagnado L
    (2008) Imaging phluorin-based probes at hippocampal synapses. Methods Mol Biol 457:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-261-8_22 pmid:19066036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. ↵
    1. Ryan TA,
    2. Smith SJ
    (1995) Vesicle pool mobilization during action potential firing at hippocampal synapses. Neuron 14:983–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(95)90336-4 pmid:7748565
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. ↵
    1. Sadler KE,
    2. Moehring F,
    3. Shiers SI,
    4. Laskowski LJ,
    5. Mikesell AR,
    6. Plautz ZR,
    7. Brezinski AN,
    8. Mecca CM,
    9. Dussor G,
    10. Price TJ,
    11. McCorvy JD,
    12. Stucky CL
    (2021) Transient receptor potential canonical 5 mediates inflammatory mechanical and spontaneous pain in mice. Sci Transl Med 13:eabd7702. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abd7702
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  114. ↵
    1. Saheki Y,
    2. De Camilli P
    (2012) Synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a005645. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005645 pmid:22763746
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  115. ↵
    1. Sanna MG,
    2. Wang SK,
    3. Gonzalez-Cabrera PJ,
    4. Don A,
    5. Marsolais D,
    6. Matheu MP,
    7. Wei SH,
    8. Parker I,
    9. Jo E,
    10. Cheng WC,
    11. Cahalan MD,
    12. Wong CH,
    13. Rosen H
    (2006) Enhancement of capillary leakage and restoration of lymphocyte egress by a chiral S1P1 antagonist in vivo. Nat Chem Biol 2:434–441. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio804 pmid:16829954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. ↵
    1. Sawamura S,
    2. Shirakawa H,
    3. Nakagawa T,
    4. Mori Y,
    5. Kaneko S
    (2017) TRP channels in the brain: what are they there for? In: Neurobiology of TRP channels (Emir TLR, ed), pp 295–322. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
  117. ↵
    1. Schikorski T,
    2. Stevens CF
    (2001) Morphological correlates of functionally defined synaptic vesicle populations. Nat Neurosci 4:391–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/86042 pmid:11276229
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. ↵
    1. Schreij AM,
    2. Fon EA,
    3. McPherson PS
    (2016) Endocytic membrane trafficking and neurodegenerative disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 73:1529–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-015-2105-x pmid:26721251
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Schwarz Y,
    2. Oleinikov K,
    3. Schindeldecker B,
    4. Wyatt A,
    5. Weißgerber P,
    6. Flockerzi V,
    7. Boehm U,
    8. Freichel M,
    9. Bruns D
    (2019) TRPC channels regulate Ca2+-signaling and short-term plasticity of fast glutamatergic synapses. PLoS Biol 17:e3000445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000445 pmid:31536487
    OpenUrlPubMed
  120. ↵
    1. Shen H,
    2. Giordano F,
    3. Wu Y,
    4. Chan J,
    5. Zhu C,
    6. Milosevic I,
    7. Wu X,
    8. Yao K,
    9. Chen B,
    10. Baumgart T,
    11. Sieburth D,
    12. De Camilli P
    (2014) Coupling between endocytosis and sphingosine kinase 1 recruitment. Nat Cell Biol 16:652–662. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2987 pmid:24929359
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  121. ↵
    1. Silva VR,
    2. Micheletti TO,
    3. Pimentel GD,
    4. Katashima CK,
    5. Lenhare L,
    6. Morari J,
    7. Mendes MC,
    8. Razolli DS,
    9. Rocha GZ,
    10. de Souza CT,
    11. Ryu D,
    12. Prada PO,
    13. Velloso LA,
    14. Carvalheira JB,
    15. Pauli JR,
    16. Cintra DE,
    17. Ropelle ER
    (2014) Hypothalamic S1P/S1PR1 axis controls energy homeostasis. Nat Commun 5:4859. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5859 pmid:25255053
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. ↵
    1. Sim-Selley LJ,
    2. Goforth PB,
    3. Mba MU,
    4. Macdonald TL,
    5. Lynch KR,
    6. Milstien S,
    7. Spiegel S,
    8. Satin LS,
    9. Welch SP,
    10. Selley DE
    (2009) Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors mediate neuromodulatory functions in the CNS. J Neurochem 110:1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06202.x pmid:19493165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. ↵
    1. Soykan T,
    2. Maritzen T,
    3. Haucke V
    (2016) Modes and mechanisms of synaptic vesicle recycling. Curr Opin Neurobiol 39:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.03.005 pmid:27016897
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. ↵
    1. Soykan T,
    2. Kaempf N,
    3. Sakaba T,
    4. Vollweiter D,
    5. Goerdeler F,
    6. Puchkov D,
    7. Kononenko NL,
    8. Haucke V
    (2017) Synaptic vesicle endocytosis occurs on multiple timescales and is mediated by formin-dependent actin assembly. Neuron 93:854–866.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.011 pmid:28231467
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. ↵
    1. Spiegel S,
    2. Milstien S
    (2003) Sphingosine-1-phosphate: an enigmatic signalling lipid. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:397–407. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1103 pmid:12728273
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. ↵
    1. Stessin AM,
    2. Gursel DB,
    3. Schwartz A,
    4. Parashar B,
    5. Kulidzhanov FG,
    6. Sabbas AM,
    7. Boockvar J,
    8. Nori D,
    9. Wernicke AG
    (2012) FTY720, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, selectively radioprotects hippocampal neural stem cells. Neurosci Lett 516:253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.004 pmid:22507238
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  127. ↵
    1. Strübing C,
    2. Krapivinsky G,
    3. Krapivinsky L,
    4. Clapham DE
    (2003) Formation of novel TRPC channels by complex subunit interactions in embryonic brain. J Biol Chem 278:39014–39019. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306705200 pmid:12857742
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  128. ↵
    1. Subei AM,
    2. Cohen JA
    (2015) Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators in multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 29:565–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-015-0261-z pmid:26239599
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  129. ↵
    1. Trkov S,
    2. Stenovec M,
    3. Kreft M,
    4. Potokar M,
    5. Parpura V,
    6. Davletov B,
    7. Zorec R
    (2012) Fingolimod–a sphingosine-like molecule inhibits vesicle mobility and secretion in astrocytes. Glia 60:1406–1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.22361 pmid:22639011
    OpenUrlPubMed
  130. ↵
    1. Varga K,
    2. Jiang ZJ,
    3. Gong LW
    (2020) Phosphatidylserine is critical for vesicle fission during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Neurochem 152:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14886 pmid:31587282
    OpenUrlPubMed
  131. ↵
    1. Venkatachalam K,
    2. Montell C
    (2007) TRP channels. Annu Rev Biochem 76:387–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142819 pmid:17579562
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. ↵
    1. Vevea JD,
    2. Chapman ER
    (2020) Acute disruption of the synaptic vesicle membrane protein synaptotagmin 1 using knockoff in mouse hippocampal neurons. Elife 9:e56469. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56469
    OpenUrl
  133. ↵
    1. Voglmaier SM,
    2. Kam K,
    3. Yang H,
    4. Fortin DL,
    5. Hua Z,
    6. Nicoll RA,
    7. Edwards RH
    (2006) Distinct endocytic pathways control the rate and extent of synaptic vesicle protein recycling. Neuron 51:71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.027 pmid:16815333
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  134. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Balaji V,
    3. Kaniyappan S,
    4. Krüger L,
    5. Irsen S,
    6. Tepper K,
    7. Chandupatla R,
    8. Maetzler W,
    9. Schneider A,
    10. Mandelkow E,
    11. Mandelkow EM
    (2017) The release and trans-synaptic transmission of Tau via exosomes. Mol Neurodegener 12:5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. ↵
    1. Weth-Malsch D,
    2. Langeslag M,
    3. Beroukas D,
    4. Zangrandi L,
    5. Kastenberger I,
    6. Quarta S,
    7. Malsch P,
    8. Kalpachidou T,
    9. Schwarzer C,
    10. Proia RL,
    11. Haberberger RV,
    12. Kress M
    (2016) Ablation of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor subtype 3 impairs hippocampal neuron excitability in vitro and spatial working memory in vivo. Front Cell Neurosci 10:258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00258 pmid:27872583
    OpenUrlPubMed
  136. ↵
    1. Willems LM,
    2. Zahn N,
    3. Ferreirós N,
    4. Scholich K,
    5. Maggio N,
    6. Deller T,
    7. Vlachos A
    (2016) Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor inhibition prevents denervation-induced dendritic atrophy. Acta Neuropathol Commun 4:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0303-x pmid:27036416
    OpenUrlPubMed
  137. ↵
    1. Wu XS,
    2. Wu LG
    (2014) The yin and yang of calcium effects on synaptic vesicle endocytosis. J Neurosci 34:2652–2659. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3582-13.2014 pmid:24523554
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  138. ↵
    1. Wu XS,
    2. McNeil BD,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Fan J,
    5. Xue L,
    6. Melicoff E,
    7. Adachi R,
    8. Bai L,
    9. Wu LG
    (2009) Ca(2+) and calmodulin initiate all forms of endocytosis during depolarization at a nerve terminal. Nat Neurosci 12:1003–1010. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2355 pmid:19633667
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  139. ↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Delling M,
    3. Jun JC,
    4. Clapham DE
    (2006) Oregano, thyme and clove-derived flavors and skin sensitizers activate specific TRP channels. Nat Neurosci 9:628–635. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1692 pmid:16617338
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  140. ↵
    1. Yang S,
    2. Park D,
    3. Manning L,
    4. Hill SE,
    5. Cao M,
    6. Xuan Z,
    7. Gonzalez I,
    8. Dong Y,
    9. Clark B,
    10. Shao L,
    11. Okeke I,
    12. Almoril-Porras A,
    13. Bai J,
    14. De Camilli P,
    15. Colón-Ramos DA
    (2022) Presynaptic autophagy is coupled to the synaptic vesicle cycle via ATG-9. Neuron 110:824–840.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.031 pmid:35065714
    OpenUrlPubMed
  141. ↵
    1. Yao CK,
    2. Lin YQ,
    3. Ly CV,
    4. Ohyama T,
    5. Haueter CM,
    6. Moiseenkova-Bell VY,
    7. Wensel TG,
    8. Bellen HJ
    (2009) A synaptic vesicle-associated Ca2+ channel promotes endocytosis and couples exocytosis to endocytosis. Cell 138:947–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.033 pmid:19737521
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. ↵
    1. Yao CK,
    2. Liu YT,
    3. Lee IC,
    4. Wang YT,
    5. Wu PY
    (2017) A Ca2+ channel differentially regulates Clathrin-mediated and activity-dependent bulk endocytosis. PLoS Biol 15:e2000931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000931 pmid:28414717
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. ↵
    1. Yao LH,
    2. Rao Y,
    3. Varga K,
    4. Wang CY,
    5. Xiao P,
    6. Lindau M,
    7. Gong LW
    (2012) Synaptotagmin 1 is necessary for the Ca2+ dependence of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Neurosci 32:3778–3785. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3540-11.2012 pmid:22423098
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  144. ↵
    1. Yao LH,
    2. Rao Y,
    3. Bang C,
    4. Kurilova S,
    5. Varga K,
    6. Wang CY,
    7. Weller BD,
    8. Cho W,
    9. Cheng J,
    10. Gong LW
    (2013) Actin polymerization does not provide direct mechanical forces for vesicle fission during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Neurosci 33:15793–15798. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2171-13.2013 pmid:24089486
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  145. ↵
    1. Yin P,
    2. Xue Y,
    3. Wang T,
    4. Zhong D,
    5. Li G
    (2021) The therapeutic targets of fingolimod (FTY720) are involved in pathological processes in the frontal cortex of Alzheimer's disease patients: a network pharmacology study. Front Aging Neurosci 13:609679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.609679 pmid:33603656
    OpenUrlPubMed
  146. ↵
    1. Yonamine I,
    2. Bamba T,
    3. Nirala NK,
    4. Jesmin N,
    5. Kosakowska-Cholody T,
    6. Nagashima K,
    7. Fukusaki E,
    8. Acharya JK,
    9. Acharya U
    (2011) Sphingosine kinases and their metabolites modulate endolysosomal trafficking in photoreceptors. J Cell Biol 192:557–567. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201004098 pmid:21321100
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  147. ↵
    1. Young MM,
    2. Takahashi Y,
    3. Fox TE,
    4. Yun JK,
    5. Kester M,
    6. Wang HG
    (2016) Sphingosine kinase 1 cooperates with autophagy to maintain endocytic membrane trafficking. Cell Rep 17:1532–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.019 pmid:27806293
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  148. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Li X,
    3. Ciric B,
    4. Ma CG,
    5. Gran B,
    6. Rostami A,
    7. Zhang GX
    (2017) Effect of fingolimod on neural stem cells: a novel mechanism and broadened application for neural repair. Mol Ther 25:401–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.12.008 pmid:28153091
    OpenUrlPubMed
  149. ↵
    1. Zucker RS,
    2. Regehr WG
    (2002) Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Physiol 64:355–405. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547 pmid:11826273
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 43 (21)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 43, Issue 21
24 May 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The SphK1/S1P Axis Regulates Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis via TRPC5 Channels
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The SphK1/S1P Axis Regulates Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis via TRPC5 Channels
Zhong-Jiao Jiang, Liang-Wei Gong
Journal of Neuroscience 24 May 2023, 43 (21) 3807-3824; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1494-22.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
The SphK1/S1P Axis Regulates Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis via TRPC5 Channels
Zhong-Jiao Jiang, Liang-Wei Gong
Journal of Neuroscience 24 May 2023, 43 (21) 3807-3824; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1494-22.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • calcium
  • cell-attached capacitance recordings
  • live-cell imaging
  • Sphingosine-1-phosphate
  • synaptic vesicle endocytosis
  • TRPC5

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Increased neuronal expression of the early endosomal adaptor APPL1 replicates Alzheimer’s Disease-related endosomal and synaptic dysfunction with cholinergic neurodegeneration.
  • Presynaptic mu opioid receptors suppress the functional connectivity of ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons with aversion-related brain regions
  • Change of spiny neuron structure in the basal ganglia song circuit and its regulation by miR-9 during song development
Show more Research Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Atypical Cadherin FAT2 Is Required for Synaptic Integrity and Motor Behaviors
  • Sex Differences in Histamine Regulation of Striatal Dopamine
  • CXCL12 Engages Cortical Inhibitory Neurons to Enhance Dendritic Spine Plasticity and Structured Network Activity
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.