Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Stephani Sutherland
Journal of Neuroscience 18 January 2023, 43 (3) 346; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.43.3.2023
Stephani Sutherland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Getting to Know Npas1-Neurons in the Ventral Pallidum

Gessynger Morais-Silva, Rianne R. Campbell, Hyungwoo Nam, Mahashweta Basu, Marco Pagliusi, et al.

(see pages 405–418)

The neural network that makes up the basal ganglia, a midbrain collection of multiple structures that handle such brain functions as motivation, reward, aversion and directed movement, includes the ventral pallidum (VP). The VP contains a heterogeneous mix of neurons that remain enigmatic in their function and even structure, although similarities between the VP and external globus pallidus (eGP) are guiding current inquiries. Now, Morais-Silva et al. have undertaken a comprehensive approach to better understand one population within the VP—those that express the neuronal Pas 1 (Npas1) protein, a transcriptional repressor that controls neuronal differentiation during development. The study encompassed inquiries into the circuitry of neurons, molecular makeup, and function within the stress response using multiple techniques in mice. Viral tracing revealed that the Npas1 neurons extended from the VP to a dizzying array of ventral brain structures, many within the basal ganglia, including the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, septum, habenula, thalamus, hypothalamus, and periaqueductal gray, but were notably absent from others, including the eGP, dorsal striatum, amygdala, substantia nigra, and all cortical structures examined, suggesting a role in emotional processing. The authors then assessed the ribosome-associated mRNA in Npas1 neurons relative to all VP neurons and found that protein-binding and chloride channel-related proteins were most differentially regulated. Experiments using chemogenetic technology and behavioral tests revealed an interesting dichotomy between Npas1 neurons expressing hM3Dq versus hM4Di receptors. Using the social defeat stress test and the chronic witness defeat stress test, the data showed that male mice became more susceptible to social stress with activation of the G-coupled hM3Dq receptor, whereas both male and female mice became more resilient to social stress with activation of hM4Di receptors. The data not only further the understanding of the structural and molecular identity of VP Npas1 neurons; they indicate that the neurons bidirectionally modulate responses to social defeat stress.

Conserved Computational Framework in Pavlovian and Instrumental Learning

Neema Moin Afshar, François Cinotti, David Martin, Mehdi Khamassi, Donna J. Calu, et al.

(see pages 458–471)

In the last century, researchers have made great strides in determining the neural underpinnings of reward-based stimulus responses in animals and humans, with important implications for neurobiological disease states such as addiction. One question that remains is whether the reinforcement-learning systems that guide learning about actions and outcomes (e.g., instrumental learning) are the same that guide learning about environmental stimuli and outcomes (e.g., Pavlovian learning). Now, Moin Afshar et al. provide new insights into how these reinforcement-learning computations may be related across associative learning mechanisms. Pavlovian learning was thought to occur in “model-free” learning, in which reward-predictive cues accrue value over time, but recent theoretical work suggested that Pavlovian learning may also be “model-based,” in which individuals acquire an internal model of the relationship between actions outcomes. In the current work, the researchers examined individual differences in rats’ behaviors during a Pavlovian autoshaping procedure to determine whether they were predominantly exhibiting sign-tracker (ST) behaviors, which approach and interact with a reward-associated cue, or goal-tracker (GT) behaviors, which, when presented with a cue will instead approach the reward-delivery location. Computational work had suggested that ST behavior was more closely associated with model-free learning, whereas GT behaviors may indicate model-based learning. To test this, the researchers assessed ST and GT behaviors in a Pavlovian conditioned approach task, and then used a multistage decision-making task to characterize learning behaviors as model-free or model-based. They found that ST rats were more likely to use model-free learning than model-based learning, as predicted. Importantly, the study suggests that Pavlovian and instrumental learning mechanisms are not unique but may be driven by a conserved neural framework, and that these processes occur in parallel. The findings shed new light on the biobehavioral underpinnings of incentive-based learning, which could aid in better understanding—and perhaps one day correcting—aberrations in this learning in disease states.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Stephani Sutherland

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 43 (3)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 43, Issue 3
18 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 18 January 2023, 43 (3) 346; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.43.3.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 18 January 2023, 43 (3) 346; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.43.3.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Getting to Know Npas1-Neurons in the Ventral Pallidum
    • Conserved Computational Framework in Pavlovian and Instrumental Learning
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.