Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Symposium and Mini-Symposium

Neural Circuit Transitions Supporting Developmentally Specific Social Behavior

Nicole C. Ferrara, Alicia Che, Brandy Briones, Nancy Padilla-Coreano, Matthew Lovett-Barron and Maya Opendak
Journal of Neuroscience 8 November 2023, 43 (45) 7456-7462; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1377-23.2023
Nicole C. Ferrara
1Discipline of Physiology and Biophysics, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois 60064
2Center for Neurobiology of Stress Resilience and Psychiatric Disorders, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois 60064
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicole C. Ferrara
Alicia Che
3Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandy Briones
4Center for the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy Padilla-Coreano
5Evelyn F. & William McKnight Brain Institute and Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nancy Padilla-Coreano
Matthew Lovett-Barron
6Department of Neurobiology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew Lovett-Barron
Maya Opendak
7Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
8Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Maya Opendak
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Environmentally appropriate social behavior is critical for survival across the lifespan. To support this flexible behavior, the brain must rapidly perform numerous computations taking into account sensation, memory, motor-control, and many other systems. Further complicating this process, individuals must perform distinct social behaviors adapted to the unique demands of each developmental stage; indeed, the social behaviors of the newborn would not be appropriate in adulthood and vice versa. However, our understanding of the neural circuit transitions supporting these behavioral transitions has been limited. Recent advances in neural circuit dissection tools, as well as adaptation of these tools for use at early time points, has helped uncover several novel mechanisms supporting developmentally appropriate social behavior. This review, and associated Minisymposium, bring together social neuroscience research across numerous model organisms and ages. Together, this work highlights developmentally regulated neural mechanisms and functional transitions in the roles of the sensory cortex, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, habenula, and the thalamus to support social interaction from infancy to adulthood. These studies underscore the need for synthesis across varied model organisms and across ages to advance our understanding of flexible social behavior.

Introduction

For many species, flexible social behavior is critical for access to limited resources, such as food, protection, and mates. Social behaviors reciprocally impact and are impacted by social context, determined by both environmental conditions (e.g., group living) and partner behavior. This social context readily impacts the developmental trajectory of social behaviors that change over the course of the lifespan. While some social contexts promote sociability and age-specific social engagement, others have deleterious effects on brain and behavioral maturation, particularly during development. Although our understanding of these processes has been limited, recent advances in neural circuit dissection tools, as well as adaptation of these tools for use at early time points, has helped uncover several novel mechanisms supporting developmentally appropriate social behavior.

During early life, environmental demands are in constant flux and require a great deal of flexibility. For altricial species, born immature, the caregiver provides key resources, such as food, protection, and warmth; and as such, the social brain of the infant must support approach behavior toward the caregiver. As infants mature and prepare for independence, alternative neural circuits must be engaged to support distinct social behavior strategies. These circuits must support behaviors adapted to the world of the adolescent, where peers replace the caregiver as primary social partners. These social groups engage in a high degree of social play that is directly impacted by social circumstances supporting or impairing social engagement. Environments that disrupt social play have negative long-term consequences on brain maturation supporting behavioral flexibility into adulthood.

Adolescent social play gives way to complex group living structures in adulthood supported by mature cortico-centric circuitry. This behavioral repertoire includes forming and maintaining dominance hierarchies, identifying ingroup/outgroup members, and participating in collective behavior. It is now understood that inputs to and outputs from prefrontal cortical subregions regulate these forms of social decision-making. However, the detailed neural circuit mechanisms supporting these complex behaviors and their development remain poorly understood. This review brings together cutting-edge work across the lifespan and across numerous model organisms to pinpoint the neural substrates supporting these age-appropriate behaviors and how these transitions can go awry.

Our goal is to highlight recent advances in our understanding of circuits supporting age-appropriate social behavior that are discussed in our 2023 Society for Neuroscience Mini-Symposium (summarized in Fig. 1). Our presentations will collectively outline developmental transitions in social behavior and the regulation of these behavioral transitions by maturing neural systems from infancy to adulthood.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Social development is supported by distinct neural circuit functions across the lifespan. For altricial species, infant-caregiver interactions are supported by serotoninergic (5-HT) signaling originating from the raphe nucleus (RN) that modulates oxytocin (OXT) release to developing cortical regions via the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). This occurs alongside basal amygdala quiescence or caregiver regulation of endogenously increasing amygdala activity. Oxytocin signaling also supports the maturation of sensory cortices. Dopaminergic innervation from the VTA in the BLA is critical for the transition from caregiver approach to peer approach-avoidance in juveniles. Into adolescence, the underdeveloped amygdala can be characterized by a reduction in local inhibitory GABAergic function (represented as circles with minus signs) that is impacted by mPFC- and dopaminergic-amygdala circuitry. Amygdala underdevelopment may be a factor contributing to the increased incidence of social play in adolescence. As neural circuitry matures, play gradually declines and is replaced by complex group living and social decision-making. Here, PFC inputs (PL, prelimbic; IL, infralimbic) to PVT encode context-specific information and coordinate behavior selection. Divergent PVT outputs to NAc and CeA mediate defensive behavior flexibility. PFC inputs from mediodorsal thalamus (MD) show dominance related plasticity while input from ventral hippocampus (vHPC) plays a role in social memory. PFC outputs to lateral hypothalamus (LH) and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) also contribute to dominance behaviors. Aligned with this, some precocial species, such as fish, can increase in group synchrony over the course of development, involving aggregation and alignment of movement, as neural circuits mature from larval to adult stages (WPF, weeks post fertilization).

Oxytocin-mediated neural circuits underlying the emergence of social touch

In rodents, touch is the first sense to form during fetal development and is among the most developed sensory modalities at birth (Bremner and Spence, 2017). During rodent infancy, social touch from caregivers is fundamental in developing secure attachment, which in turn significantly influences the emotional and cognitive development of the offspring (Kaffman and Meaney, 2007; Cascio et al., 2019). In neonatal rodents, tactile information from whiskers is critical to maintaining contact with and receiving milk from the dam, and early tactile sensory disruption, such as whisker trimming, can lead to long-lasting impairment in cognition, social behavior, and stress reactivity (Kaffman and Meaney, 2007; Landers and Sullivan, 2012; Soumiya et al., 2016). Notably, neurons in the adult primary somatosensory cortex (S1) can encode tactile stimuli from conspecifics (social touch), differentiating them from stimuli evoked by neutral objects (neutral touch) (Bobrov et al., 2014; Lenschow and Brecht, 2015). Despite the prominent role of tactile sensory processing in social behaviors, the neural mechanisms mediating this ability of cortical neurons to represent social touch are unknown.

Exogeneous oxytocin injections can promote learning social odor cues associated with the dam, forming tighter huddling in a litter, and suckling behaviors (Nelson and Panksepp, 1996; Nelson and Alberts, 1997; Alberts, 2007; Kojima and Alberts, 2011), while knocking out oxytocin or oxytocin receptors (OXTRs) causes separation distress vocalizations in neonates (Insel and Winslow, 1991; Winslow et al., 2000; Winslow and Insel, 2002; Takayanagi et al., 2005). These findings indicate that oxytocin can enhance the required proximity to social cues that permit social learning in neonates. Therefore, oxytocin could act as an effector molecule mediating the entrainment of social touch because of its experience-dependent activity during this developmentally sensitive period.

Unpublished rodent data from the Che laboratory used longitudinal in vivo 2-photon imaging in developing mice to test the hypothesis that oxytocin is required for establishing proper synaptic connectivity in the developing S1 for both tactile sensory perception and social information processing. Che's group found that OXTRs are preferentially expressed in somatostatin (SST) interneurons in the developing S1, and the OXTR agonist TGOT induces large depolarizing currents as well as robust spontaneous firing in SST interneurons as early as postnatal day 9. Removing OXTRs specifically from SST interneurons results in persistent, oversynchronized spontaneous network activity in vivo, suggesting that oxytocin signaling might be involved in circuit desynchronization required for information processing. In addition, following the acute activation of SST interneurons, TGOT leads to long-lasting reduction in inhibitory synaptic transmission, suggesting that OXTR activation also has the capacity to further promote synaptic plasticity following network desynchronization. Che's ongoing work tests whether the presence of a social context (dam/dam odor), which activates oxytocinergic neurons, reduces synchronization and enhances sensory responses of L2/3 neurons in preweaning mice. Their unpublished findings indicate that oxytocin signaling can have profound influence on circuit assembly in the sensory cortex during early postnatal stage, providing a mechanism for how social features are encoded alongside tactile sensory inputs.

Infant social behavior: mesocorticolimbic circuits supporting caregiver approach

Sensing maternal cues is just the beginning of a circuit cascade that promotes approach toward a caregiver and ensures pup survival. Indeed, the neural circuitry supporting early social behavior reflects the unique social world of the developing individual. Unlike the adult rodent that participates in complex social hierarchies and seeks a mate, the primary social behavior for the infant rodent is learning attachment to a caregiver and seeking and maintaining proximity to them. While this proximity-seeking does not involve the basolateral amygdala (BLA) (Raineki et al., 2019), the learned caregiver does have the ability to partially or completely suppress infant BLA activity. This suppression of BLA activity and plasticity prevents rodent infants from learning to avoid cues paired with shock (Moriceau and Sullivan, 2006; Opendak et al., 2018, 2019; Robinson-Drummer et al., 2019). Instead of learning avoidance, fear conditioning in the presence of the caregiver actually engages attachment circuits to promote approach toward these conditioned stimuli — a phenomenon that has recently been demonstrated in children (Tottenham et al., 2019).

Recent circuit dissection work in rat pups has identified a role for dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the BLA in generating developmental transitions in social behavior (Opendak et al., 2021). Whereas preweaning pups demonstrate a strong bias toward approaching a caregiver, older rat pups show more inhibited social approach behavior toward novel peers. Optogenetic inhibition of BLA principal neurons or inhibition of VTA terminals in the BLA increased social approach in postweaning pups, while stimulation of these loci inhibited social approach. Inhibiting these circuits has no impact on social approach behavior in typically developing preweaning pups. Together, these results demonstrate that dopaminergic innervation of the BLA transitions a system biasing social approach toward the caregiver toward one favoring a balance of approach and avoidance as infants mature. This developmental trajectory is robustly impacted by early social adversity, with maltreated rats showing early emergence of avoidant behavior caused by amygdala hyperactivity and dopaminergic innervation of the BLA.

Recent work from the Opendak laboratory suggests that these circuit transitions may also involve an upstream modulator of VTA dopamine release, the lateral habenula (LHb). This region is an interface between the forebrain and the monoaminergic systems and is widely considered the brain's “anti-reward region,” as it responds to aversive cues or the absence of expected rewards by suppressing DA release from the VTA (Baker et al., 2022; Mondoloni et al., 2022). Although this region is known to be important for adult social behavior flexibility (Benekareddy et al., 2018), our understanding of its role in development is limited. Opendak's laboratory assessed the role of this brain region in social behavior transitions using metabolic imaging and chemogenetics in the preweaning and postweaning rat pup. This unpublished work suggests that the LHb promotes a developmental transition in social behavior when threats are present. Specifically, when a threat cue is present, the LHb increases approach toward a social cue in preweaning pups, whereas the LHb inhibits approach in postweaning pups. As such, the LHb may be supporting developmentally specific social behavior: when the infant is threatened, approaching the social partner for safety (e.g., caregiver) is adaptive, whereas later in development, social partners are more ambiguous and may themselves be threats. Additional research highlights specific habenula circuits that promote this transition. Together, this body of work highlights specific neural circuit changes promoting unique social behavior strategies as environmental demands change.

Regulation of adolescent and adult social behavior by developing basomedial amygdala circuitry

From infancy to adolescence of the rat, amygdala function changes and its activity across ages regulates social behavior and behavior regulated by the environment (Varlinskaya et al., 1999; Varlinskaya and Spear, 2008; Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2017; Selleck et al., 2018; Ferrara et al., 2021). As a neuroanatomical corollary to these environmental changes, long-range infralimbic (IL) connections within the amygdala change from adolescence to adulthood (Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2017). These inputs are progressively pruned throughout adolescence, and their integration, strength, and capacity to activate amygdala neurons increase with rat age (Cressman et al., 2010; Selleck et al., 2018). The basomedial subdivision of the amygdala (BMA) displays a great deal of sensitivity and unique responsivity to social circumstances (Adhikari et al., 2015; Mesquita et al., 2016; Vitor-Vieira et al., 2021; Ineichen et al., 2022). In line with this, recent work from the Ferrara laboratory has demonstrated that repeated social defeat stress in the rat reduces both social interaction and BMA neuronal firing in adults, supporting the notion that BMA activation is directly tied to social state (Ritger et al., 2023). The rodent BMA is not only sensitive to social stimuli, differentially responding to same- and opposite-sex partners and regulating physiological responses to social novelty, but is also an important site for environmental encoding (Rajbhandari et al., 2021; Mazuski and O'Keefe, 2022). Consistent with BMA activation, adolescent social development encompasses a heightened sensitivity to the social environment and a gradual decline in social play that is replaced by increases in preference for opposite sex partners (Meaney and Stewart, 1981; Thor and Holloway, 1984). Thus, the environmental sensitivity and differential activation to different partners in adulthood optimally position the BMA to regulate age-specific social behaviors in adolescents and adults. However, BMA regulation of social behavior and activation by the IL in adolescence are still unclear.

Ongoing work from the Ferrara laboratory investigates how the IL influences BMA activity from adolescence to adulthood to support transitions in social exploration that are impacted by the environment. Using a combination of fiber photometry and immediate early gene expression of BMA activity, Ferrara's unpublished work shows that BMA activity was elevated during and following adolescent rat social interaction to a greater extent compared with adults. To explore the necessity of the BMA in social development, Ferrara's laboratory used a chemogenetic approach to inhibit the BMA before social interaction, varying partner sex and environmental novelty. This work revealed that BMA inhibition reduced age-specific social interaction in a manner that depended on environmental novelty, suggesting that environmental circumstances guide BMA regulation of age-specific social behavior.

While many afferent projections may activate the BMA, maturational changes of prefrontal cortical-amygdala circuitry optimally positions IL regulation of the BMA in age-dependent changes in BMA function underlying rodent social development. To understand developmental differences in IL-BMA circuitry, Ferrara's laboratory used single-unit in vivo extracellular recordings. Unpublished data support the idea that the IL excites the BMA to a greater extent in adolescents relative to adults. Thus, BMA excitation may be directly tied to developmental decreases in approach that are sensitive to environmental novelty and become increasingly dependent on partners into adulthood. Together, this work suggests that IL engagement of BMA neuronal activity may underlie developmental differences in contextually-guided social behavior.

A putative role for paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus in adult social behavior

As individuals mature into adulthood, the navigation of new social environments is challenging, especially in cases where there is limited information or prior experiences to guide behavior. Situations like these, where decisions need to be made quickly, promote the use of heuristics (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974), a behavior selection strategy reliant on readily available cues. Social psychologists have explored how learning, perception, internal state, and context influence the selection of social behaviors (White and Kight, 1984; Bargh et al., 1996; Garcia et al., 2002; van Baaren et al., 2004), demonstrating a variety of ways in which social decisions can be biased. However, the underlying neural circuits and mechanisms modulating adult social decision-making and affiliated behaviors in novel contexts are not fully understood.

Behavioral adaptation to dynamic contexts across species requires multimodal sensory integration at a rapid time-scale in addition to filtering cues and information according to their relevance. Previous studies in rodents have demonstrated that the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) is a central node important for coordinating said responses (Otis et al., 2017; Engelke et al., 2021). In line with this, others have reported PVT involvement in associative learning, the detection of stressful stimuli, and selection of active and defensive behaviors (Beas et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2021). However, all of these rodent behaviors were conducted in solitude, leaving the role of the PVT within a social context unknown. Given the PVT's functional and genetic diversity, and, similar to the BMA, its interconnectedness with amygdalar, hypothalamic, and IL regions (Gao et al., 2023; for review, see McGinty and Otis, 2020), it is well positioned to modulate the selection and initiation of social behaviors. Within the rodent PVT, sex steroid hormones may play an especially important role in navigating social context, as these hormones act through hormone receptors via genomic and nongenomic mechanisms to sculpt circuits important for social behaviors (Ervin et al., 2015). Estrogen receptor Esr1-expressing neurons, in particular, play a role in a myriad of social behaviors throughout the brain (Lee et al., 2014; Peña and Champagne, 2015; Hashikawa et al., 2017; Fang et al., 2018; Calvigioni et al., 2023) and are directly and indirectly regulated by circulating hormones. Thus, in an attempt to uncover a role for PVT in social contexts, work by Briones and colleagues has begun to interrogate Esr1-expressing neurons in the rodent PVT within novel social behavior assays.

Prefrontal control over social dominance via the hypothalamus

The complex neural transitions designed to support adult social decision-making are put to the test when adults encounter the challenge of the social dominance hierarchy. Most social species, from insects to humans, organize into social dominance hierarchies to decrease aggression, conserve energy, and maximize survival for the group (Dwortz et al., 2022). Individuals must consider their social rank in any social encounter and adjust their behavior accordingly. Despite social and dominance behaviors being critical for successful interactions with other group members, it is unclear how the brain encodes social rank (Zhou et al., 2018; Strauss et al., 2022). However, recent work has begun to unravel the neural substrates supporting this complex process.

The rodent medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) has been implicated in social dominance across species. Optogenetic stimulation of mPFC neurons in mice increases dominance expression and can result in sustained increases in social rank (Zhou et al., 2017). Similarly, in humans playing a game that requires learning the ranks of different players, the rostral mPFC correlates with social rank learning and trans-magnetically stimulating rostral mPFC improves learning (Ligneul et al., 2016). Despite evidence linking mPFC to social dominance, how the mPFC encodes social rank and which circuits mediate this computation are unknown. To tackle this question, Padilla-Coreano et al. (2022) developed a social competition assay in which mice compete for rewards signaled by a tone. This assay allowed for the recording of mPFC single-neuron activity during a trial-based competition and to dissociate responses to competitive success from social rank differences. Padilla-Coreano et al. (2022) also developed a computer vision tool, Alphatracker, to track multiple unmarked animals and found that mPFC population activity is predictive of behavior during the social competition (Padilla-Coreano et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2023). This revealed that social rank and future competitive success are encoded by mPFC population dynamics, with dominant mice having larger ensembles that encode competition relevant information. Finally, Padilla-Coreano et al. (2022) identified a subpopulation of mPFC cells that project to the lateral hypothalamus that drives dominance behavior during the reward competition. This work collectively links mPFC-hypothalamic circuitry to dominance behaviors underlying mouse social hierarchy formation.

Two studies point to the possibility of the mediodorsal thalamic input being part of this prefrontal circuitry that mediates social hierarchy formation. Prefrontal inputs from the mediodorsal thalamic show plasticity and strengthening after competitive success (Zhou et al., 2017), and silencing the mediodorsal thalamic prevents formation of social hierarchies in mice (Nelson et al., 2019). Although there is no direct evidence, the role of the rodent hippocampus in social memory and of the dorsal raphe nucleus in social stress make them likely to interact with the mPFC during social dominance control. Padilla-Coreano's ongoing work is assessing how this extended circuit may be working together to control social dominance and competitive success.

Neurodevelopment of collective behavior: schooling fish as a case study

Social behavioral dynamics within social units extend beyond hierarchies to group living, where animals form large collectives to jointly navigate their environments as a cohesive unit (Krause and Ruxton, 2002; Sumpter, 2010). These behaviors are a benefit to individuals in groups, using social cues to improve their ability to avoid predators (Sosna et al., 2019; Poel et al., 2022), forage for food (Handegard et al., 2012), and navigate noisy environments (Berdahl et al., 2013). These collective behaviors emerge as a consequence of individual interaction rules, including short-range avoidance, long-range attraction, and alignment with nearest neighbors (Krause and Ruxton, 2002; Couzin, 2009; Sumpter, 2010; Vicsek and Zafeiris, 2012).

Like many social behaviors in vertebrates (Adkins-Regan, 2013), collective movement emerges as animals develop and mature. This has been well studied in shoaling fish, particularly zebrafish (Buske and Gerlai, 2011; Orger and de Polavieja, 2017). Young larval zebrafish at 1 week after fertilization do not show social attraction (Dreosti et al., 2015; Hinz and de Polavieja, 2017; Larsch and Baier, 2018; Stednitz and Washbourne, 2020) but do engage in close-range social avoidance based on vision (Larsch and Baier, 2018; Harpaz et al., 2021) and mechanosensation (Groneberg et al., 2020). By 3 weeks of age, juvenile zebrafish show evidence of social attraction (Dreosti et al., 2015; Hinz and de Polavieja, 2017; Larsch and Baier, 2018; Stednitz and Washbourne, 2020; Harpaz et al., 2021), and preferentially aggregate in shoals of two or more fish. By presenting embedded juvenile zebrafish with biological motion stimuli, Kappel et al. (2022) identified the dorsal thalamus as a region enriched in neurons responsive to biological motion stimuli, and important for the attraction aspect of shoaling.

Shoaling fish, like zebrafish, show robust social aggregation but limited postural alignment, whereas schooling fish also show strong polarization, where nearby animals share common posture and heading direction. While much is known about the ontogeny of the shoaling zebrafish, less is known about the development of schooling and social polarization, despite seminal early work on the development of aggregation and alignment in schooling fish (Shaw, 1960, 1961). Danionella cerebrum are a promising model system for optical accessibility of neural processes throughout the lifespan during visually based schooling in the laboratory (Penalva et al., 2018; Schulze et al., 2018; Britz et al., 2021; Hoffmann et al., 2022; Rajan et al., 2022). Lovett-Barron's ongoing work studies the development of schooling in maturing Danionella, with a focus on the maturation of social interactions and neural encoding of biological motion.

Conclusion and Future Directions

The last several years have seen an explosion in the field of social neuroscience, supported by technological innovations permitting circuit dissection in freely behaving groups of animals. In parallel, circuit dissection tools have been adapted for early developmental time points to understand how social behavior patterns are formed in early life. Now is the time to synthesize this work across the lifespan to highlight specific mechanisms promoting adaptive transitions in social behavior. Our SfN Symposium collectively covers several developmentally regulated neural mechanisms, including the roles of the sensory cortex, the PFC, amygdala, and the thalamus that all play a role in social behavior from early life through adulthood. This work spans multiple time points and various model organisms to pinpoint specific neural substrates supporting developmentally appropriate social behavior, from sensing and approaching the caregiver to collective behavior in group-living adults.

However, numerous important questions remain concerning the development of adaptive social behavior. For example, does the mPFC-amygdala maturational trajectory align with social rank representation? Do early life experiences shape somatosensory cortical and cortical-amygdala circuits that subsequently influence social experience and aggregation or predispose the animal to be of higher or lower rank? In addition, identifying the mPFC inputs that encode social context may have a lasting impact on social maturation from early life into adulthood that in turn affects group living. To advance our understanding of flexible social behavior, it is clear that it will be necessary to leverage various model species evolved to meet the demands of their specific ethological niche.

Understanding the underlying features of social development and the reciprocal interactions with maturing neural circuitry has wide implications for a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders, where disrupted social behavior is a core feature of compromised mental health, including anxiety and depression. These alterations in social function provide a robust early diagnostic marker of disorders that emerge in later life. Yet, we have little understanding of the ontogeny of social behavior neural circuits or how environmental perturbation at different stages of development impacts emerging behavior. Continued research in this area will help identify the potential neural basis for comorbid sensory abnormalities and social deficits in neuropsychiatric disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Importantly, understanding the neural regulation of social maturation will provide a framework for the development of age-appropriate therapeutics and interventions for individuals with social behavior deficits emerging across the lifespan.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by BBRF Young Investigator Award to M.O., A.C., and N.P.-C.; BRAIN Initiative R00-MH124434 and R01-MH133456 to M.O.; BRAIN Initiative NRSA F32-MH127772 to B.B.; NIDA Diversity Supplement Grant R37-DA032750 to B.B.; Schweppe Scholar Award to N.C.F.; R00-NS114166 and R01-NS133434 to A.C.; Swebilius Foundation Grant to A.C.; R00MH124435 to N.P.-C.; and Burroughs Wellcome Fund to N.P.-C. M.L.-B. was supported by the Searle Scholars Program, a Sloan Research Fellowship, a Packard Fellowship, a Klingenstein-Simons Award in Neuroscience, and a Pew Biomedical Scholar Award. A.C. was supported in part by the State of Connecticut, Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. This publication does not express the views of the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services or the State of Connecticut. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors.

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Maya Opendak at Opendak{at}kennedykrieger.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Adhikari A,
    2. Lerner TN,
    3. Finkelstein J,
    4. Pak S,
    5. Jennings JH,
    6. Davidson TJ,
    7. Ferenczi E,
    8. Gunaydin LA,
    9. Mirzabekov JJ,
    10. Ye L,
    11. Kim SY,
    12. Lei A,
    13. Deisseroth K
    (2015) Basomedial amygdala mediates top-down control of anxiety and fear. Nature 527:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15698 pmid:26536109
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Adkins-Regan E
    (2013) Hormones and animal social behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
  3. ↵
    1. Alberts JR
    (2007) Huddling by rat pups: ontogeny of individual and group behavior. Dev Psychobiol 49:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20190 pmid:17186514
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Arruda-Carvalho M,
    2. Wu WC,
    3. Cummings KA,
    4. Clem RL
    (2017) Optogenetic examination of prefrontal-amygdala synaptic development. J Neurosci 37:2976–2985. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3097-16.2017 pmid:28193691
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Baker PM,
    2. Mathis V,
    3. Lecourtier L,
    4. Simmons SC,
    5. Nugent FS,
    6. Hill S,
    7. Mizumori SJ
    (2022) Lateral habenula beyond avoidance: roles in stress, memory, and decision-making with implications for psychiatric disorders. Front Syst Neurosci 16:826475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.826475 pmid:35308564
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bargh JA,
    2. Chen M,
    3. Burrows L
    (1996) Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J Pers Soc Psychol 71:230–244. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.230 pmid:8765481
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Beas BS,
    2. Wright BJ,
    3. Skirzewski M,
    4. Leng Y,
    5. Hyun JH,
    6. Koita O,
    7. Ringelberg N,
    8. Kwon HB,
    9. Buonanno A,
    10. Penzo MA
    (2018) The locus coeruleus drives disinhibition in the midline thalamus via a dopaminergic mechanism. Nat Neurosci 21:963–973. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0167-4 pmid:29915192
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Benekareddy M,
    2. Stachniak TJ,
    3. Bruns A,
    4. Knoflach F,
    5. von Kienlin M,
    6. Künnecke B,
    7. Ghosh A
    (2018) Identification of a corticohabenular circuit regulating socially directed behavior. Biol Psychiatry 83:607–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.10.032 pmid:29336819
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Berdahl A,
    2. Torney CJ,
    3. Ioannou CC,
    4. Faria JJ,
    5. Couzin ID
    (2013) Emergent sensing of complex environments by mobile animal groups. Science 339:574–576. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225883 pmid:23372013
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Bobrov E,
    2. Wolfe J,
    3. Rao RP,
    4. Brecht M
    (2014) The representation of social facial touch in rat barrel cortex. Curr Biol 24:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.049 pmid:24361064
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bremner AJ,
    2. Spence C
    (2017) Chapter 7: the development of tactile perception. Adv Child Dev Behav 52:227–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2016.12.002 pmid:28215286
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Britz R,
    2. Conway KW,
    3. Rüber L
    (2021) The emerging vertebrate model species for neurophysiological studies is Danionella cerebrum, new species (Teleostei: cyprinidae). Sci Rep 11:18942. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97600-0 pmid:34556691
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Buske C,
    2. Gerlai R
    (2011) Shoaling develops with age in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35:1409–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.09.003 pmid:20837077
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Calvigioni D,
    2. Fuzik J,
    3. Le Merre P,
    4. Slashcheva M,
    5. Jung F,
    6. Ortiz C,
    7. Lentini A,
    8. Csillag V,
    9. Graziano M,
    10. Nikolakopoulou I,
    11. Weglage M,
    12. Lazaridis I,
    13. Kim H,
    14. Lenzi I,
    15. Park H,
    16. Reinius B,
    17. Carlén M,
    18. Meletis K
    (2023) Esr1+ hypothalamic-habenula neurons shape aversive states. Nat Neurosci 26:1245–1255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01367-8 pmid:37349481
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Cascio CJ,
    2. Moore D,
    3. McGlone F
    (2019) Social touch and human development. Dev Cogn Neurosci 35:5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.009 pmid:29731417
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Chen Z,
    2. Zhang R,
    3. Fang H-S,
    4. Zhang YE,
    5. Bal A,
    6. Zhou H,
    7. Rock RR,
    8. Padilla-Coreano N,
    9. Keyes LR,
    10. Zhu H,
    11. Li Y-L,
    12. Komiyama T,
    13. Tye KM,
    14. Lu C
    (2023) AlphaTracker: a multi-animal tracking and behavioral analysis tool. Front Behav Neurosci 17:1111908.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Couzin ID
    (2009) Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn Sci 13:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.002 pmid:19058992
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Cressman VL,
    2. Balaban J,
    3. Steinfeld S,
    4. Shemyakin A,
    5. Graham P,
    6. Parisot N,
    7. Moore H
    (2010) Prefrontal cortical inputs to the basal amygdala undergo pruning during late adolescence in the rat. J Comp Neurol 518:2693–2709. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22359 pmid:20506471
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Dreosti E,
    2. Lopes G,
    3. Kampff AR,
    4. Wilson SW
    (2015) Development of social behavior in young zebrafish. Front Neural Circuits 9:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2015.00039 pmid:26347614
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Dwortz MF,
    2. Curley JP,
    3. Tye KM,
    4. Padilla-Coreano N
    (2022) Neural systems that facilitate the representation of social rank. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 377:20200444. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0444 pmid:35000438
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Engelke DS,
    2. Zhang XO,
    3. O'Malley JJ,
    4. Fernandez-Leon JA,
    5. Li S,
    6. Kirouac GJ,
    7. Beierlein M,
    8. Do-Monte FH
    (2021) A hypothalamic-thalamostriatal circuit that controls approach-avoidance conflict in rats. Nat Commun 12:2517. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22730-y pmid:33947849
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Ervin KS,
    2. Lymer JM,
    3. Matta R,
    4. Clipperton-Allen AE,
    5. Kavaliers M,
    6. Choleris E
    (2015) Estrogen involvement in social behavior in rodents: rapid and long-term actions. Horm Behav 74:53–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.05.023 pmid:26122289
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Fang YY,
    2. Yamaguchi T,
    3. Song SC,
    4. Tritsch NX,
    5. Lin D
    (2018) A hypothalamic midbrain pathway essential for driving maternal behaviors. Neuron 98:192–207. e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.02.019 pmid:29621487
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ferrara NC,
    2. Trask S,
    3. Rosenkranz JA
    (2021) Maturation of amygdala inputs regulate shifts in social and fear behaviors: a substrate for developmental effects of stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 125:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.021 pmid:33581221
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Gao C,
    2. Gohel CA,
    3. Leng Y,
    4. Ma J,
    5. Goldman D,
    6. Levine AJ,
    7. Penzo MA
    (2023) Molecular and spatial profiling of the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus. Elife 12:e81818. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81818 pmid:36867023
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Garcia SM,
    2. Weaver K,
    3. Moskowitz GB,
    4. Darley JM
    (2002) Crowded minds: the implicit bystander effect. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:843–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.843 pmid:12374439
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Groneberg AH,
    2. Marques JC,
    3. Martins AL,
    4. Del Corral RD,
    5. de Polavieja GG,
    6. Orger MB
    (2020) Early-life social experience shapes social avoidance reactions in larval zebrafish. Curr Biol 30:4009–4021. e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.088 pmid:32888479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Handegard NO,
    2. Boswell KM,
    3. Ioannou CC,
    4. Leblanc SP,
    5. Tjøstheim DB,
    6. Couzin ID
    (2012) The dynamics of coordinated group hunting and collective information transfer among schooling prey. Curr Biol 22:1213–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.050 pmid:22683262
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Harpaz R,
    2. Nguyen MN,
    3. Bahl A,
    4. Engert F
    (2021) Precise visuomotor transformations underlying collective behavior in larval zebrafish. Nat Commun 12:6578. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26748-0 pmid:34772934
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Hashikawa K,
    2. Hashikawa Y,
    3. Tremblay R,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Feng JE,
    6. Sabol A,
    7. Piper WT,
    8. Lee H,
    9. Rudy B,
    10. Lin D
    (2017) Esr1+ cells in the ventromedial hypothalamus control female aggression. Nat Neurosci 20:1580–1590. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4644 pmid:28920934
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hinz RC,
    2. de Polavieja GG
    (2017) Ontogeny of collective behavior reveals a simple attraction rule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:2295–2300. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616926114 pmid:28193864
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Hoffmann M,
    2. Henninger J,
    3. Richter L,
    4. Judkewitz B
    (2022) Brain-wide imaging of an adult vertebrate with image transfer oblique plane microscopy. bioRxiv 492103. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.16.492103.
  33. ↵
    1. Ineichen C,
    2. Greter A,
    3. Baer M,
    4. Sigrist H,
    5. Sautter E,
    6. Sych Y,
    7. Helmchen F,
    8. Pryce CR
    (2022) Basomedial amygdala activity in mice reflects specific and general aversion uncontrollability. Eur J Neurosci 55:2435–2454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15090 pmid:33338290
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Insel TR,
    2. Winslow JT
    (1991) Central administration of oxytocin modulates the infant rat's response to social isolation. Eur J Pharmacol 203:149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(91)90806-2 pmid:1665788
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Kaffman A,
    2. Meaney MJ
    (2007) Neurodevelopmental sequelae of postnatal maternal care in rodents: clinical and research implications of molecular insights. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48:224–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01730.x pmid:17355397
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Kappel JM,
    2. Förster D,
    3. Slangewal K,
    4. Shainer I,
    5. Svara F,
    6. Donovan JC,
    7. Sherman S,
    8. Januszewski M,
    9. Baier H,
    10. Larsch J
    (2022) Visual recognition of social signals by a tectothalamic neural circuit. Nature 608:146–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04925-5 pmid:35831500
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Kojima S,
    2. Alberts JR
    (2011) Oxytocin mediates the acquisition of filial, odor-guided huddling for maternally-associated odor in preweanling rats. Horm Behav 60:549–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.08.003 pmid:21872599
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Krause J,
    2. Ruxton GD
    (2002) Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  39. ↵
    1. Landers MS,
    2. Sullivan RM
    (2012) The development and neurobiology of infant attachment and fear. Dev Neurosci 34:101–114. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336732 pmid:22571921
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Larsch J,
    2. Baier H
    (2018) Biological motion as an innate perceptual mechanism driving social affiliation. Curr Biol 28:3523–3532. e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.014 pmid:30393036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Lee H,
    2. Kim DW,
    3. Remedios R,
    4. Anthony TE,
    5. Chang A,
    6. Madisen L,
    7. Zeng H,
    8. Anderson DJ
    (2014) Scalable control of mounting and attack by Esr1+ neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus. Nature 509:627–632. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13169 pmid:24739975
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Lenschow C,
    2. Brecht M
    (2015) Barrel cortex membrane potential dynamics in social touch. Neuron 85:718–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.059 pmid:25640075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Ligneul R,
    2. Obeso I,
    3. Ruff CC,
    4. Dreher JC
    (2016) Dynamical representation of dominance relationships in the human rostromedial prefrontal cortex. Curr Biol 26:3107–3115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.015 pmid:28094034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Ma J,
    2. du Hoffmann J,
    3. Kindel M,
    4. Beas BS,
    5. Chudasama Y,
    6. Penzo MA
    (2021) Divergent projections of the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus mediate the selection of passive and active defensive behaviors. Nat Neurosci 24:1429–1440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00912-7 pmid:34413514
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Mazuski C,
    2. O'Keefe J
    (2022) Representation of ethological events by basolateral amygdala neurons. Cell Rep 39:110921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110921 pmid:35675779
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. McGinty JF,
    2. Otis JM
    (2020) Heterogeneity in the paraventricular thalamus: the traffic light of motivated behaviors. Front Behav Neurosci 14:590528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.590528 pmid:33177999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Meaney MJ,
    2. Stewart J
    (1981) A descriptive study of social development in the rat (Rattus norvegicus). Anim Behav 29:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80149-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. ↵
    1. Mesquita LT,
    2. Abreu AR,
    3. de Abreu AR,
    4. de Souza AA,
    5. de Noronha SR,
    6. Silva FC,
    7. Campos GS,
    8. Chianca DA,
    9. de Menezes RC
    (2016) New insights on amygdala: basomedial amygdala regulates the physiological response to social novelty. Neuroscience 330:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.053 pmid:27261213
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Mondoloni S,
    2. Mameli M,
    3. Congiu M
    (2022) Reward and aversion encoding in the lateral habenula for innate and learned behaviours. Transl Psychiatry 12:3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01774-0 pmid:35013094
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Moriceau S,
    2. Sullivan RM
    (2006) Maternal presence serves as a switch between learning fear and attraction in infancy. Nat Neurosci 9:1004–1006. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1733 pmid:16829957
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Nelson E,
    2. Panksepp J
    (1996) Oxytocin mediates acquisition of maternally associated odor preferences in preweanling rat pups. Behav Neurosci 110:583–592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Nelson E,
    2. Alberts JR
    (1997) Oxytocin-Induced Paw Sucking in Infant Rats. Ann Ny Acad Sci 807:543–545.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Opendak M,
    2. Zanca RM,
    3. Anane E,
    4. Serrano PA,
    5. Sullivan RM
    (2018) Developmental transitions in amygdala PKC isoforms and AMPA receptor expression associated with threat memory in infant rats. Sci Rep 8:14679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32762-y pmid:30279521
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Opendak M,
    2. Robinson-Drummer P,
    3. Blomkvist A,
    4. Zanca RM,
    5. Wood K,
    6. Jacobs L,
    7. Chan S,
    8. Tan S,
    9. Woo J,
    10. Venkataraman G,
    11. Kirschner E,
    12. Lundstrom JN,
    13. Wilson DA,
    14. Serrano PA,
    15. Sullivan RM
    (2019) Neurobiology of maternal regulation of infant fear: the role of mesolimbic dopamine and its disruption by maltreatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 44:1247–1257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0340-9 pmid:30758321
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Opendak M,
    2. Raineki C,
    3. Perry RE,
    4. Rincon-Cortes M,
    5. Song SC,
    6. Zanca RM,
    7. Wood E,
    8. Packard K,
    9. Hu S,
    10. Woo J,
    11. Martinez K,
    12. Vinod KY,
    13. Brown RW,
    14. Deehan GA Jr.,
    15. Froemke RC,
    16. Serrano PA,
    17. Wilson DA,
    18. Sullivan RM
    (2021) Bidirectional control of infant rat social behavior via dopaminergic innervation of the basolateral amygdala. Neuron 109:4018–4035. e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.041 pmid:34706218
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Orger MB,
    2. de Polavieja GG
    (2017) Zebrafish behavior: opportunities and challenges. Annu Rev Neurosci 40:125–147. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-033857 pmid:28375767
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Otis JM,
    2. Namboodiri VM,
    3. Matan AM,
    4. Voets ES,
    5. Mohorn EP,
    6. Kosyk O,
    7. McHenry JA,
    8. Robinson JE,
    9. Resendez SL,
    10. Rossi MA,
    11. Stuber GD
    (2017) Prefrontal cortex output circuits guide reward seeking through divergent cue encoding. Nature 543:103–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21376 pmid:28225752
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Padilla-Coreano N, et al
    . (2022) Cortical ensembles orchestrate social competition through hypothalamic outputs. Nature 603:667–671. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04507-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Peña CJ,
    2. Champagne FA
    (2015) Neonatal overexpression of estrogen receptor-α alters midbrain dopamine neuron development and reverses the effects of low maternal care in female offspring. Dev Neurobiol 75:1114–1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22206 pmid:25044746
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Penalva A,
    2. Bedke J,
    3. Cook ES,
    4. Barrios JP,
    5. Bertram EP,
    6. Douglass AD
    (2018) Establishment of the miniature fish species Danionella translucida as a genetically and optically tractable neuroscience model. bioRxiv 444026. https://doi.org/10.1101/444026.
  61. ↵
    1. Poel W,
    2. Daniels BC,
    3. Sosna MM,
    4. Twomey CR,
    5. Leblanc SP,
    6. Couzin ID,
    7. Romanczuk P
    (2022) Subcritical escape waves in schooling fish. Sci Adv 8:eabm6385. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm6385 pmid:35731883
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Raineki C,
    2. Opendak M,
    3. Sarro E,
    4. Showler A,
    5. Bui K,
    6. McEwen BS,
    7. Wilson DA,
    8. Sullivan RM
    (2019) During infant maltreatment, stress targets hippocampus, but stress with mother present targets amygdala and social behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:22821–22832.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Rajan G,
    2. Lafaye J,
    3. Faini G,
    4. Carbo-Tano M,
    5. Duroure K,
    6. Tanese D,
    7. Panier T,
    8. Candelier R,
    9. Henninger J,
    10. Britz R,
    11. Judkewitz B,
    12. Gebhardt C,
    13. Emiliani V,
    14. Debregeas G,
    15. Wyart C,
    16. Del Bene F
    (2022) Evolutionary divergence of locomotion in two related vertebrate species. Cell Rep 38:110585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110585 pmid:35354040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Rajbhandari AK,
    2. Octeau CJ,
    3. Gonzalez S,
    4. Pennington ZT,
    5. Mohamed F,
    6. Trott J,
    7. Chavez J,
    8. Ngyuen E,
    9. Keces N,
    10. Hong WZ,
    11. Neve RL,
    12. Waschek J,
    13. Khakh BS,
    14. Fanselow MS
    (2021) A basomedial amygdala to intercalated cells microcircuit expressing PACAP and its receptor PAC1 regulates contextual fear. J Neurosci 41:3446–3461. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2564-20.2021 pmid:33637560
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Ritger AC,
    2. Stickling CP,
    3. Ferrara NC
    (2023) The impact of social defeat on basomedial amygdala neuronal activity in adult male rats. Behav Brain Res 446:114418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114418 pmid:37004789
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Robinson-Drummer PA,
    2. Opendak M,
    3. Blomkvist A,
    4. Chan S,
    5. Tan S,
    6. Delmer C,
    7. Wood K,
    8. Sloan A,
    9. Jacobs L,
    10. Fine E,
    11. Chopra D,
    12. Sandler C,
    13. Kamenetzky G,
    14. Sullivan RM
    (2019) Infant trauma alters social buffering of threat learning: emerging role of prefrontal cortex in preadolescence. Front Behav Neurosci 13:132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00132 pmid:31293398
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Schulze L,
    2. Henninger J,
    3. Kadobianskyi M,
    4. Chaigne T,
    5. Faustino AI,
    6. Hakiy N,
    7. Albadri S,
    8. Schuelke M,
    9. Maler L,
    10. Del Bene F,
    11. Judkewitz B
    (2018) Transparent Danionella translucida as a genetically tractable vertebrate brain model. Nat Methods 15:977–983. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0144-6 pmid:30323353
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Selleck RA,
    2. Zhang W,
    3. Samberg HD,
    4. Padival M,
    5. Rosenkranz JA
    (2018) Limited prefrontal cortical regulation over the basolateral amygdala in adolescent rats. Sci Rep 8:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35649-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Shaw E
    (1960) The development of schooling behavior in fishes. Physiol Zool 33:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.33.2.30152296
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. ↵
    1. Shaw E
    (1961) The development of schooling in fishes: II. Physiol Zool 34:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.34.4.30161205
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Sosna MM,
    2. Twomey CR,
    3. Bak-Coleman J,
    4. Poel W,
    5. Daniels BC,
    6. Romanczuk P,
    7. Couzin ID
    (2019) Individual and collective encoding of risk in animal groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:20556–20561. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905585116 pmid:31548427
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Soumiya H,
    2. Godai A,
    3. Araiso H,
    4. Mori S,
    5. Furukawa S,
    6. Fukumitsu H
    (2016) Neonatal whisker trimming impairs fear/anxiety-related emotional systems of the amygdala and social behaviors in adult mice. PLoS One 11:e0158583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158583 pmid:27362655
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Stednitz SJ,
    2. Washbourne P
    (2020) Rapid progressive social development of zebrafish. Zebrafish 17:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2019.1815 pmid:31930951
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Strauss ED,
    2. Curley JP,
    3. Shizuka D,
    4. Hobson EA
    (2022) The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 377:20200432. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0432 pmid:35000437
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Sumpter DJ
    (2010) Collective animal behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
  76. ↵
    1. Takayanagi Y,
    2. Yoshida M,
    3. Bielsky IF,
    4. Ross HE,
    5. Kawamata M,
    6. Onaka T,
    7. Yanagisawa T,
    8. Kimura T,
    9. Matzuk MM,
    10. Young LJ,
    11. Nishimori K
    (2005) Pervasive social deficits, but normal parturition, in oxytocin receptor-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:16096–16101. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505312102 pmid:16249339
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Thor DH,
    2. Holloway WR Jr.
    (1984) Developmental analyses of social play behavior in juvenile rats. Bull Psychon Soc 22:587–590. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333916
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Tottenham N,
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Flannery J,
    4. Caldera C,
    5. Sullivan RM
    (2019) Parental presence switches avoidance to attraction learning in children. Nat Hum Behav 3:1070–1077. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0656-9 pmid:31332302
    OpenUrlPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Tversky A,
    2. Kahneman D
    (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 pmid:17835457
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. van Baaren RB,
    2. Holland RW,
    3. Kawakami K,
    4. van Knippenberg A
    (2004) Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychol Sci 15:71–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501012.x pmid:14717835
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Varlinskaya EI,
    2. Spear LP
    (2008) Social interactions in adolescent and adult Sprague–Dawley rats: impact of social deprivation and test context familiarity. Behav Brain Res 188:398–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2007.11.024 pmid:18242726
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Varlinskaya EI,
    2. Spear LP,
    3. Spear NE
    (1999) Social behavior and social motivation in adolescent rats: role of housing conditions and partner's activity. Physiol Behav 67:475–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00285-6 pmid:10549884
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Vicsek T,
    2. Zafeiris A
    (2012) Collective motion. Phys Rep 517:71–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004
    OpenUrl
  84. ↵
    1. Vitor-Vieira F,
    2. Vilela FC,
    3. Giusti-Paiva A
    (2021) Hyperactivation of the amygdala correlates with impaired social play behavior of prepubertal male rats in a maternal immune activation model. Behav Brain Res 414:113503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113503 pmid:34331970
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. White GL,
    2. Kight TD
    (1984) Misattribution of arousal and attraction: effects of salience of explanations for arousal. J Exp Soc Psychol 20:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(84)90012-X
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  86. ↵
    1. Winslow JT,
    2. Insel TR
    (2002) The social deficits of the oxytocin knockout mouse. Neuropeptides 36:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1054/npep.2002.0909 pmid:12359512
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Winslow JT,
    2. Hearn EF,
    3. Ferguson J,
    4. Young LJ,
    5. Matzuk MM,
    6. Insel TR
    (2000) Infant vocalization, adult aggression, and fear behavior of an oxytocin null mutant mouse. Horm Behav 37:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.1999.1566 pmid:10753584
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Zhou T,
    2. Zhu H,
    3. Fan Z,
    4. Wang F,
    5. Chen Y,
    6. Liang H,
    7. Yang Z,
    8. Zhang L,
    9. Lin L,
    10. Zhan Y,
    11. Wang Z,
    12. Hu H
    (2017) History of winning remodels thalamo-PFC circuit to reinforce social dominance. Science 357:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aak9726 pmid:28706064
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. ↵
    1. Zhou T,
    2. Sandi C,
    3. Hu H
    (2018) Advances in understanding neural mechanisms of social dominance. Curr Opin Neurobiol 49:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.01.006 pmid:29428628
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Nachtrab G,
    3. Keyes PC,
    4. Allen WE,
    5. Luo L,
    6. Chen X
    (2018) Dynamic salience processing in paraventricular thalamus gates associative learning. Science 362:423–429. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0481 pmid:30361366
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 43 (45)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 43, Issue 45
8 Nov 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neural Circuit Transitions Supporting Developmentally Specific Social Behavior
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Neural Circuit Transitions Supporting Developmentally Specific Social Behavior
Nicole C. Ferrara, Alicia Che, Brandy Briones, Nancy Padilla-Coreano, Matthew Lovett-Barron, Maya Opendak
Journal of Neuroscience 8 November 2023, 43 (45) 7456-7462; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1377-23.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Neural Circuit Transitions Supporting Developmentally Specific Social Behavior
Nicole C. Ferrara, Alicia Che, Brandy Briones, Nancy Padilla-Coreano, Matthew Lovett-Barron, Maya Opendak
Journal of Neuroscience 8 November 2023, 43 (45) 7456-7462; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1377-23.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Conclusion and Future Directions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Beyond the 5-HT2A Receptor: Classic and Nonclassic Targets in Psychedelic Drug Action
  • Astrocytes as Drivers and Disruptors of Behavior: New Advances in Basic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targeting
  • Listening to the Data: Computational Approaches to Addiction and Learning
Show more Symposium and Mini-Symposium

Subjects

  • 2023 Annual Meeting Issue
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.