Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 12 June 2024, 44 (24) etwij44242024; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.44.24.2024
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

How Sleep Transforms Our Memories

Elizabeth Siefert, Sindhuja Uppuluri, Jianing Mu, Marlie Tandoc, James Antony, and Anna Schapiro

(see article e0022242024)

Memory consolidation is a process that stabilizes and transforms memories for long-term storage. Memory consolidation is thought to be supported by reactivation of individual memories when we sleep, but memories can be contextually complex and typically not all components of memories are remembered as strongly over time. In this issue, Siefert et al. investigated the role of memory reactivation during sleep in shaping different components of a memory. Male and female participants first learned novel object categories in which objects had both distinct and overlapping features. Next, a real-time EEG protocol was used to cue reactivation of the objects by playing their names during moments of sleep that are considered ideal for memory reactivation, which is known as the targeted memory reactivation technique. Memory reactivation improved how well distinct traits of objects were remembered, yet worsened memory of overlapping features. Thus, memory reactivation during sleep does not act indiscriminately over all features of object memories, rather it differentiates and modulates distinct components of them, driving memory transformation. These findings are a breakthrough in our understanding of how sleep shapes and transforms memory.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

A macaque. See Kim and Pasupathy for more information about how this animal model was used to investigate visual crowding. Image: Flickr/Alix Lee, licensed under Public Domain.

Investigating the Neurophysiology of Visual Crowding

Taekjun Kim and Anitha Pasupathy

(see article e2260232024)

Imagine looking for your friend in a crowd or searching for a pen in a drawer filled to the brim with other utensils and tools. Distracting visual stimuli in crowded environments make it difficult to identify objects of interest. This frequent phenomenon has been well described, but the underlying neural mechanisms of visual crowding remain unclear. Kim and Pasupathy tested the hypothesis that visual crowding is driven by pooled encoding of features from both target and distracting stimuli, which results in a loss of information about target objects. They recorded from a large number of neurons in the visual cortex (more specifically, V4) of two monkeys and discovered that stimulus features that influence crowding, such as the number, distance, and position of distracting stimuli, significantly altered V4 activity. Notably, enhancing the salience of target objects strengthened target selectivity of neurons and diminished the distractibility of crowded environments. While these findings support the idea that aspects of crowded environments negatively influence target object detection, the finding that target object salience diminishes the strength of crowding is not quite consistent with the pooled encoding hypothesis. This study is important because it not only bridges the gap between psychophysical and neurophysiological crowding effects, but it also advances our understanding of how multiple simultaneously presented stimuli may be encoded in the cortex.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Paige McKeon

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 44 (24)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 44, Issue 24
12 Jun 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 12 June 2024, 44 (24) etwij44242024; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.44.24.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 12 June 2024, 44 (24) etwij44242024; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.44.24.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.