Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation over Frontal Eye Fields Mimics Attentional Modulation of Visual Processing

Jonas Misselhorn, Marina Fiene, Jan-Ole Radecke, Andreas K. Engel and Till R. Schneider
Journal of Neuroscience 19 June 2024, 44 (25) e1510232024; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1510-23.2024
Jonas Misselhorn
1Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonas Misselhorn
Marina Fiene
1Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marina Fiene
Jan-Ole Radecke
1Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
2Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck 23562, Germany
3Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lübeck, Lübeck 23562, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jan-Ole Radecke
Andreas K. Engel
1Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Till R. Schneider
1Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Till R. Schneider
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

Guidelines

As a forum for professional feedback, submissions of letters are open to all. You do not need to be a subscriber. To avoid redundancy, we urge you to read other people's letters before submitting your own. Name, current appointment, place of work, and email address are required to send a letter, and will be published with your review. We also require that you declare any competing financial interests. Unprofessional submissions will not be considered or responded to.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson{at}gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Mimicking Attentional Modulation? Rethinking the Effects of In-Phase Alpha tACS on Perceptual Variability
    Feiyang Cao
    Submitted on: 11 June 2025
  • Submitted on: (11 June 2025)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Mimicking Attentional Modulation? Rethinking the Effects of In-Phase Alpha tACS on Perceptual Variability
    RE: Mimicking Attentional Modulation? Rethinking the Effects of In-Phase Alpha tACS on Perceptual Variability
    • Feiyang Cao, Graduate Student, Master of Psychology, Boston University

    Misselhorn et al. (2024) report that bilateral in-phase alpha transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over the frontal eye fields (FEF) increases perceptual variability during a contrast discrimination task, which they interpret as mimicking endogenous attention. In this commentary, we challenge that interpretation on both theoretical and methodological grounds. While the behavioural effect is noteworthy, we argue that the observed changes are more plausibly attributed to a disruption in perceptual stability rather than an enhancement of attentional modulation. Specifically, the use of synchronous alpha tACS across both hemispheres may override the brain's intrinsic, lateralised attentional rhythms, particularly the anti-phase dynamics thought to support spatially selective attention.
    Moreover, the task employed lacked key features, such as spatial cueing or competition, typically required to engage endogenous attention. Consequently, the observed effect may not reflect attentional mechanisms. We suggest that future research should employ task-relevant attention paradigms, anti-phase stimulation protocols, and real-time neural tracking to clarify the functional impact of externally imposed rhythms on attentional control. A more detailed commentary expanding on these points is available at: [bioRxiv link]

    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 44 (25)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 44, Issue 25
19 Jun 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation over Frontal Eye Fields Mimics Attentional Modulation of Visual Processing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation over Frontal Eye Fields Mimics Attentional Modulation of Visual Processing
Jonas Misselhorn, Marina Fiene, Jan-Ole Radecke, Andreas K. Engel, Till R. Schneider
Journal of Neuroscience 19 June 2024, 44 (25) e1510232024; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1510-23.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation over Frontal Eye Fields Mimics Attentional Modulation of Visual Processing
Jonas Misselhorn, Marina Fiene, Jan-Ole Radecke, Andreas K. Engel, Till R. Schneider
Journal of Neuroscience 19 June 2024, 44 (25) e1510232024; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1510-23.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • alpha oscillations
  • attention
  • contrast perception
  • frontal eye fields
  • psychophysics
  • tACS

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Mimicking Attentional Modulation? Rethinking the Effects of In-Phase Alpha tACS on Perceptual Variability
    Feiyang Cao
    Published on: 11 June 2025
  • Published on: (11 June 2025)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Mimicking Attentional Modulation? Rethinking the Effects of In-Phase Alpha tACS on Perceptual Variability
    RE: Mimicking Attentional Modulation? Rethinking the Effects of In-Phase Alpha tACS on Perceptual Variability
    • Feiyang Cao, Graduate Student, Master of Psychology, Boston University

    Misselhorn et al. (2024) report that bilateral in-phase alpha transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over the frontal eye fields (FEF) increases perceptual variability during a contrast discrimination task, which they interpret as mimicking endogenous attention. In this commentary, we challenge that interpretation on both theoretical and methodological grounds. While the behavioural effect is noteworthy, we argue that the observed changes are more plausibly attributed to a disruption in perceptual stability rather than an enhancement of attentional modulation. Specifically, the use of synchronous alpha tACS across both hemispheres may override the brain's intrinsic, lateralised attentional rhythms, particularly the anti-phase dynamics thought to support spatially selective attention.
    Moreover, the task employed lacked key features, such as spatial cueing or competition, typically required to engage endogenous attention. Consequently, the observed effect may not reflect attentional mechanisms. We suggest that future research should employ task-relevant attention paradigms, anti-phase stimulation protocols, and real-time neural tracking to clarify the functional impact of externally imposed rhythms on attentional control. A more detailed commentary expanding on these points is available at: [bioRxiv link]

    Competing Interests: None declared.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Gene expression-based lesion-symptom mapping: FOXP2 and language impairments after stroke
  • Visual Distortions in Human Amblyopia Are Correlated with Deficits in Contrast Sensitivity
  • Distinct Portions of Superior Temporal Sulcus Combine Auditory Representations with Different Visual Streams
Show more Research Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Gene expression-based lesion-symptom mapping: FOXP2 and language impairments after stroke
  • Distinct Portions of Superior Temporal Sulcus Combine Auditory Representations with Different Visual Streams
  • Microsaccade Direction Reveals the Variation in Auditory Selective Attention Processes
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.