Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 3 July 2024, 44 (27) etwij44272024; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.44.27.2024
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Presymptomatic Developmental Changes in a Xenopus ALS/FTD Model

Francesca van Tartwijk, Lucia Wunderlich, Ioanna Mela, Stanislaw Makarchuk, Maximilian Jakobs et al.

(see article e2148232024)

Variants of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) exhibit issues in condensation and localization of the RNA-binding protein (RBP) fused in sarcoma (FUS). In this issue, van Tartwijk et al. investigated whether RBP-associated alterations in axonal cytoskeletal organization and branching occur in an in vivo Xenopus (a type of aquatic frog) model of FUS-associated disease as is the case with neurodevelopmental diseases. Two existing Xenopus ALS/FTD mutant models were used: FUS(P525L) and FUS(16R). The authors found that both mutants reduced axonal complexity in vivo. They explored whether this was cue-dependent ex vivo because they also observed an axon defect that they suspected to arise from cue signaling errors. They developed a combined fluorescence and atomic force microscopy approach to discover that mutant FUS reduced actin density in the growth cone, suggesting that FUS mutant Xenopus acquired defects early in axon development. This identification of presymptomatic developmental changes in axonal organization advances our understanding of familial disease variants.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Four different kinds of GFP-tagged FUS mRNA constructs were injected into embryos at the four-cell stage. Pictured is FUS(P525L)-GFP localization in vivo. See van Tartwijk et al. for more details.

New Insights into How Deep Brain Stimulation Works

Raghavan Gopalakrishnan, David Cunningham, Olivia Hogue, Madeleine Schroedel, Brett Campbell et al.

(see article e2149232024)

Cerebellar dentate deep brain stimulation (DN-DBS) has shown promise as a treatment poststroke, but the mechanisms through which it works remain unknown. Herein, Gopalakrishnan et al. investigated corticocerebellar network changes associated with long-term DN-DBS treatment because previous findings from their lab revealed that corticocerebellar networks stay active to maintain motor control following stroke. In this issue, they investigated the excitability of the ipsilesional cortex, the DN, and their interaction after 4–8 months of DN-DBS treatment. Ten human participants showed improved motor control, significantly altered ipsilesional premotor cortex activity, and diminished coherence between the cerebral cortex and the cerebellum. The scientists also observed that DN connectivity with the ipselesional cortex was predictive of DN-DBS–associated motor control outcomes. Thus, the ipselesional cortex becomes less dependent on cerebellocortical inputs and more engaged in motor control as patients recover from stroke with DN-DBS. These novel mechanistic insights are informative for the field and advance our understanding of how DN-DBS works.

Footnotes

  • This Week in The Journal was written by Paige McKeon

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 44 (27)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 44, Issue 27
3 Jul 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 3 July 2024, 44 (27) etwij44272024; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.44.27.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 3 July 2024, 44 (27) etwij44272024; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.twij.44.27.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.