Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Voltage clamp analysis of membrane currents in larval muscle fibers of Drosophila: alteration of potassium currents in Shaker mutants

CF Wu and FN Haugland
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1985, 5 (10) 2626-2640; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-10-02626.1985
CF Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FN Haugland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The body wall muscles in Drosophila larvae are suitable for voltage clamp analysis of changes in membrane excitability caused by mutations. Both inward and outward ionic currents are present in these muscle fibers. The inward current is mediated by voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. In Ca2+-free saline, the inward current is eliminated. The remaining outward K+ currents consist of two distinct components, an early transient IA and a delayed steady IK, which are separable by differences in the rate and voltage dependence of activation and inactivation. The steady-state and kinetic properties of the activation and inactivation processes of these two currents are analyzed. The results provide a basis for quantitative analysis of altered membrane currents in behavioral mutants of Drosophila. Previous studies indicate that mutations in the Shaker (Sh) locus alter excitability in both nerve and muscle in Drosophila. Our results support the idea that the channels mediating IA are molecularly distinct from those mediating IK. All Sh mutations studied specifically affect IA without changing the properties of the calcium current and IK. In certain alleles (ShKS133, Sh102, and ShM) IA is eliminated, permitting detailed studies of IK in isolation of IA. Studies of the alleles that do not eliminate IA provide additional information of the channels. In one such allele, Sh5, voltage dependence of IA activation is shifted to more positive potentials. This is accompanied by a less pronounced shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation. These results suggest that Sh5 mutation affects the voltage-sensitive mechanism of both activation and inactivation processes and that these two processes are not controlled by independent parts of the channel. Furthermore, the differential effects of these alleles on different excitable membranes imply that other genes take part in the control of IA. The effects of Sh5 on muscle depend on developmental stage. In larval muscle, Sh5 reduces the amplitude of IA because of the shift in the current-voltage (I-V) relation. In contrast, in adult Sh5 muscles, IA is reported to be normal in amplitude but shows abnormally rapid inactivation (Salkoff, L., and R. Wyman (1981) Nature 293: 228–230). A different allele, ShrK0120, causes a clear defect in nerve excitability, but analysis of IA in ShrK0120 larval muscle reveals I-V relations, inactivation, and recovery from inactivation similar to those seen in normal fibers. We suggest a possible mechanism of combinations of multiple interacting genes participating in the control of potassium channels to account for the presence of a variety of potassium channels in different excitable membranes.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 5 (10)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 5, Issue 10
1 Oct 1985
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Voltage clamp analysis of membrane currents in larval muscle fibers of Drosophila: alteration of potassium currents in Shaker mutants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Voltage clamp analysis of membrane currents in larval muscle fibers of Drosophila: alteration of potassium currents in Shaker mutants
CF Wu, FN Haugland
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1985, 5 (10) 2626-2640; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-10-02626.1985

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Voltage clamp analysis of membrane currents in larval muscle fibers of Drosophila: alteration of potassium currents in Shaker mutants
CF Wu, FN Haugland
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1985, 5 (10) 2626-2640; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-10-02626.1985
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.