Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Experience alters the spatial tuning of auditory units in the optic tectum during a sensitive period in the barn owl

EI Knudsen
Journal of Neuroscience 1 November 1985, 5 (11) 3094-3109; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-11-03094.1985
EI Knudsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The auditory spatial tuning of bimodal (auditory-visual) units in the optic tectum of the barn owl was altered by raising animals with one ear occluded. Changes in spatial tuning were assessed by comparing the location of a unit's auditory best area with that of its visual receptive field. As shown previously, auditory best areas are aligned with visual receptive fields in the tecta of normal birds (Knudsen, E. I. (1982) J. Neurosci. 2: 1177–1194). It was demonstrated in this study that, when birds were raised with one ear occluded, best areas and visual receptive fields were aligned only as long as the earplug was in place. When the earplug was removed, best areas and visual receptive fields became misaligned, indicating that a change in auditory spatial tuning had taken place during the period of occlusion. However, in a bird that received an earplug as an adult, no such alterations in auditory spatial tuning were observed; even after 1 year of monaural occlusion, auditory best areas and visual receptive fields were misaligned so long as the earplug was in place, and were aligned when the earplug was removed. These results suggest that exposure to abnormal localization cues modifies the auditory spatial tuning of tectal units only during a restricted, sensitive period early in development. After the earplug was removed from a juvenile bird that had been raised with an occluded ear, the initial misalignment between auditory best areas and visual receptive fields decreased gradually over a period of weeks. In contrast, when earplugs were removed from two adult birds that had been raised with monaural occlusions, auditory- visual misalignments persisted for as long as measurements were made, which was up to 1 year after earplug removal. These data indicate that auditory cues become permanently associated with locations in visual space during a critical period which draws to a close at about the age when the animal reaches adulthood. Horseradish peroxidase was injected into two optic tecta (in a single animal) that contained units with permanently altered auditory spatial tuning. The positions of retrogradely labeled cells in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICX) were the same as those observed in control birds (Knudsen, E. I., and P. F. Knudsen (1983) J. Comp. Neurol. 218: 187–196). Thus, the changes in spatial tuning were not due to a shift in the topographic projection from the ICX to the optic tectum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 5 (11)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 5, Issue 11
1 Nov 1985
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Experience alters the spatial tuning of auditory units in the optic tectum during a sensitive period in the barn owl
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Experience alters the spatial tuning of auditory units in the optic tectum during a sensitive period in the barn owl
EI Knudsen
Journal of Neuroscience 1 November 1985, 5 (11) 3094-3109; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-11-03094.1985

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Experience alters the spatial tuning of auditory units in the optic tectum during a sensitive period in the barn owl
EI Knudsen
Journal of Neuroscience 1 November 1985, 5 (11) 3094-3109; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-11-03094.1985
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.