Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Guidance of neuronal growth cones in the grasshopper embryo. IV. Temporal delay experiments

CQ Doe, MJ Bastiani and CS Goodman
Journal of Neuroscience 1 December 1986, 6 (12) 3552-3563; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-12-03552.1986
CQ Doe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MJ Bastiani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CS Goodman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In the previous 3 papers, we demonstrated that neuronal growth cones display selective affinities for both specific axonal and glial pathways in the grasshopper embryo; for example, the pCC growth cone selectively recognizes the MP1/dMP2 axons, while the aCC growth cone selectively recognizes the U axons and a specific glial cell (the segment boundary cell). We were interested in further testing the temporal specificity of these affinities. To address this issue, we performed specific temporal transplant experiments by using a laser microbeam in ovo to ablate the neuronal precursor cell, neuroblast (NB) 1–1, that generates the aCC and pCC neurons. Neighboring ectodermal cells regulate and replace the ablated NB 1–1; the new NB 1–1 then generates the aCC and pCC neurons with a temporal delay of 10–20 hr (2– 4% of development), depending upon the experimental paradigm. The results of these temporal delay experiments further demonstrate the selective affinities of the aCC and pCC growth cones for specific axonal and glial surfaces and confirm that these specificities are absolute and not hierarchical. Furthermore, they suggest that precise timing is not important; both the pCC and aCC growth cones are able to selectively recognize their appropriate axonal and glial pathways after delays of 10–20 hr despite being confronted with the surfaces of many additional axons and pathways.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 6 (12)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 6, Issue 12
1 Dec 1986
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Guidance of neuronal growth cones in the grasshopper embryo. IV. Temporal delay experiments
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Guidance of neuronal growth cones in the grasshopper embryo. IV. Temporal delay experiments
CQ Doe, MJ Bastiani, CS Goodman
Journal of Neuroscience 1 December 1986, 6 (12) 3552-3563; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-12-03552.1986

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Guidance of neuronal growth cones in the grasshopper embryo. IV. Temporal delay experiments
CQ Doe, MJ Bastiani, CS Goodman
Journal of Neuroscience 1 December 1986, 6 (12) 3552-3563; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-12-03552.1986
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.