Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Pharmacology of retinotectal transmission in the goldfish: effects of nicotinic ligands, strychnine, and kynurenic acid

RB Langdon and JA Freeman
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 1987, 7 (3) 760-773; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-03-00760.1987
RB Langdon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JA Freeman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate different neurotransmitters and their receptors that might be involved in retinotectal transmission in the goldfish. Sections of tectum were isolated and maintained in vitro while pharmacological agents were administered via the tissue bath. Field potentials were elicited by electrical stimulation of the optic nerve and recorded at 50 micron depth intervals, and profiles of current source densities (CSDs) were computed from the second spatial derivatives of these potentials. The preparations were treated with low [Ca2+]/high [Mg2+] media, various cholinergic agonists and antagonists, eserine, strychnine, or kynurenic acid, via the tissue bath. Prior to treatment, depth profiles of these in vitro field potentials and CSDs closely resembled those previously reported in vivo, including 2 prominent sink-source pairs with their sinks in the superficial optic neuropil, followed by a smaller and more prolonged sink-source pair of opposite polarity. These were rapidly and reversibly eliminated by low [Ca2+]/high [Mg2+] bathing media, and substantially reduced by 0.5 or 1.0 mM kynurenic acid. By contrast, d-tubocurarine (d-TC; up to 0.16 mM) reduced peak response amplitudes by less than 40%, eliminated the third sink-source pair, and more than doubled the duration of decay of sink-source pairs 1 and 2 in a concentration-dependent manner. Strychnine had a similar action to d-TC but was slightly more potent. The time course and amplitudes of responses were not much affected by the following nicotinic agonists or antagonists (concentrations in microM): mecamylamine, 50; dihydro-beta-erythroidine, 50; nicotine, 200; tetramethylammonium, 500; ACh (protected by eserine, 20), 200; alpha-bungarotoxin, 2 microM for 2.5 hr, and 0.4 microM for up to 10.5 hr; and lophotoxin, 32 microM for up to 94 min. Eserine (20 microM) and carbachol (200 microM) increased peak response amplitudes by up to 80% within 5–10 min, and amplitudes remained elevated during 20–33 min of continued treatment. The onset of the effects of d-TC, strychnine, and kynurenic acid began in 5–10 min and was completed in 30 min or less, indicating that test substances could adequately penetrate into the interior of the isolated sections of tectum. The failure of these cholinergic ligands to prevent postsynaptic responses indicates that excitatory retinotectal transmission does not depend on an intact nicotinic (or other cholinergic) system, as previously proposed. The action by kynurenic acid suggests the involvement of an excitatory amino acid neurotransmitter in retinotectal transmission.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 7 (3)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 7, Issue 3
1 Mar 1987
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pharmacology of retinotectal transmission in the goldfish: effects of nicotinic ligands, strychnine, and kynurenic acid
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Pharmacology of retinotectal transmission in the goldfish: effects of nicotinic ligands, strychnine, and kynurenic acid
RB Langdon, JA Freeman
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 1987, 7 (3) 760-773; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-03-00760.1987

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Pharmacology of retinotectal transmission in the goldfish: effects of nicotinic ligands, strychnine, and kynurenic acid
RB Langdon, JA Freeman
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 1987, 7 (3) 760-773; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-03-00760.1987
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.