Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: presynaptic action potentials regulate protein synthesis in nucleus magnocellularis neurons

DE Born and EW Rubel
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 1988, 8 (3) 901-919; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-03-00901.1988
DE Born
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville 22908.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EW Rubel
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville 22908.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Studies of the avian auditory system indicate that neurons in nucleus magnocellularis (NM) and nucleus laminaris of young animals are dramatically altered by changes in the auditory receptor. We examined the role of presynaptic activity on these transneuronal regulatory events. TTX was used to block action potentials in the auditory nerve. TTX injections into the perilymph reliably blocked all neuronal activity in the cochlear nerve and NM. Far-field recordings of sound- evoked potentials revealed that responses returned within 6–12 hr after a single TTX injection. Changes in protein synthesis by NM neurons were measured by determining the incorporation of 3H-leucine using autoradiography. NM neurons on the side of the brain ipsilateral to the TTX injection were compared to normally active cells on the other side of the same tissue section. Grain counts over individual neurons revealed that a single injection of TTX produced a 40% decrease in grain density in ipsilateral NM neurons within 1.5 hr after the TTX injection. However, by 24 hr after a single TTX injection, grain densities were not different on the 2 sides of the brain. Continuous activity blockade for 6 hr caused the cessation of amino acid incorporation in a portion of NM neurons and a 15–20% decrease in the remaining neurons. These changes in amino acid incorporation are comparable to those following complete removal of the cochlea (Steward and Rubel, 1985). We also examined NM for neuron loss and soma shrinkage after blocking eighth nerve action potentials. TTX injected every 12 hr for 48 hr caused a 20% neuron loss and an 8% shrinkage of the remaining neurons. Similar reductions were found following cochlea removal (Born and Rubel, 1985). It is concluded that neuronal activity plays a major role in the maintenance of normal NM neurons. Furthermore, these results suggest that transneuronal morphological changes seen in neurons following deafferentation or alterations of sensory experience are a result of changes in the level of presynaptic activity.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 8 (3)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 8, Issue 3
1 Mar 1988
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: presynaptic action potentials regulate protein synthesis in nucleus magnocellularis neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: presynaptic action potentials regulate protein synthesis in nucleus magnocellularis neurons
DE Born, EW Rubel
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 1988, 8 (3) 901-919; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-03-00901.1988

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: presynaptic action potentials regulate protein synthesis in nucleus magnocellularis neurons
DE Born, EW Rubel
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 1988, 8 (3) 901-919; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-03-00901.1988
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.