Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Non-steady-state measurement of in vivo receptor binding with positron emission tomography: "dose-response" analysis

JS Perlmutter, MR Kilbourn, MJ Welch and ME Raichle
Journal of Neuroscience 1 July 1989, 9 (7) 2344-2352; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-07-02344.1989
JS Perlmutter
Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MR Kilbourn
Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MJ Welch
Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ME Raichle
Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We previously developed a non-steady-state technique using positron emission tomography (PET) and the radioligand 18F-spiperone (18F-SP) for the measurement of in vivo radioligand-receptor binding in brain. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the sensitivity of this method to alterations in the apparent number of available specific binding sites. Nine studies were performed on the same baboon. The animal was pretreated with varying doses of unlabeled SP (15–600 micrograms) to compete for specific binding sites. The experimental procedure included measurement of regional cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and the protein binding of 18F-SP in arterial blood. At least 3.5 hr after pretreatment, no-carrier-added 18F-SP (containing less than 3 micrograms SP) was administered intravenously. Sequential PET scans and measurements of arterial-blood radioactivity due to radioligand and its labeled metabolites continued for 3 hr. A 3- compartment model representing the in vivo behavior of radioligand was used to analyze the data. As expected, we found that an index of binding called the combined forward rate constant (which equals the product of the apparent maximum number of available specific binding sites and the association rate constant of radioligand for receptor) declined with increasing dose of unlabeled SP. Other estimated variables including the dissociation rate constant did not change. This demonstrates that our non-steady-state method for estimating radioligand-receptor binding kinetics can detect a decrease in the apparent number of available specific binding sites. This is an important step in the validation of this in vivo receptor binding assay and its subsequent application.

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 9, Issue 7
1 Jul 1989
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non-steady-state measurement of in vivo receptor binding with positron emission tomography: "dose-response" analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Non-steady-state measurement of in vivo receptor binding with positron emission tomography: "dose-response" analysis
JS Perlmutter, MR Kilbourn, MJ Welch, ME Raichle
Journal of Neuroscience 1 July 1989, 9 (7) 2344-2352; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-07-02344.1989

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Non-steady-state measurement of in vivo receptor binding with positron emission tomography: "dose-response" analysis
JS Perlmutter, MR Kilbourn, MJ Welch, ME Raichle
Journal of Neuroscience 1 July 1989, 9 (7) 2344-2352; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-07-02344.1989
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.