Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-field Coupling across the Human Neocortex

John C. Myers [PhD], Elliot H. Smith [PhD.], Marcin Leszczynski [PhD.], James O’Sullivan [PhD.], Mark Yates [PhD.], Guy McKhann II [MD.], Nima Mesgarani [PhD.], Charles Schroeder [PhD.], Catherine Schevon [MD., PhD.] and Sameer A. Sheth [MD., PhD.]
Journal of Neuroscience 5 July 2022, JN-RM-0050-22; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0050-22.2022
John C. Myers
1Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elliot H. Smith
2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
5Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcin Leszczynski
3Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James O’Sullivan
4Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Yates
3Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guy McKhann II
3Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nima Mesgarani
4Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Schroeder
3Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Schevon
5Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sameer A. Sheth
1Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Neuronal coherence is thought to be a fundamental mechanism of communication in the brain, where synchronized field potentials coordinate synaptic and spiking events to support plasticity and learning. Although the spread of field potentials has garnered great interest, little is known about the spatial reach of phase synchronization, or neuronal coherence. Functional connectivity between different brain regions is known to occur across long distances, but the locality of synchronization across the neocortex is understudied. Here we used simultaneous recordings from electrocorticography (ECoG) grids and high-density microelectrode arrays to estimate the spatial reach of neuronal coherence and spike-field coherence (SFC) across frontal, temporal, and occipital cortices during cognitive tasks in humans. We observed the strongest coherence within a 2-3 cm distance from the microelectrode arrays, potentially defining an effective range for local communication. This range was relatively consistent across brain regions, spectral frequencies, and cognitive tasks. The magnitude of coherence showed power law decay with increasing distance from the microelectrode arrays, where the highest coherence occurred between ECoG contacts, followed by coherence between ECoG and deep cortical LFP, and then SFC (i.e., ECoG > LFP > SFC). The spectral frequency of coherence also affected its magnitude. Alpha coherence (8-14 Hz) was generally higher than other frequencies for signals nearest the microelectrode arrays, whereas delta coherence (1-3 Hz) was higher for signals that were farther away. Action potentials in all brain regions were most coherent with the phase of alpha oscillations, which suggests that alpha waves could play a larger, more spatially local role in spike timing than other frequencies. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the spatial and spectral dynamics of neuronal synchronization, further advancing knowledge about how activity propagates across the human brain.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Coherence is theorized to facilitate information transfer across cerebral space by providing a convenient electrophysiological mechanism to modulate membrane potentials in spatiotemporally complex patterns. Our work uses a multi-scale approach to evaluate the spatial reach of phase coherence and spike-field coherence during cognitive tasks in humans. Locally, coherence can reach up to 3 cm around a given area of neocortex. The spectral properties of coherence revealed that alpha phase- and spike-field coherence were higher within ranges less than 2 cm, whereas lower frequency delta coherence was higher for contacts farther away. Spatiotemporally shared information (i.e., coherence) across neocortex seems to reach farther than field potentials alone.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This study was supported by R01 MH106700 (SAS), Dana Foundation (SAS), McNair Foundation (SAS) and the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (#26706; EHS).

SfN exclusive license.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-field Coupling across the Human Neocortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-field Coupling across the Human Neocortex
John C. Myers [PhD], Elliot H. Smith [PhD.], Marcin Leszczynski [PhD.], James O’Sullivan [PhD.], Mark Yates [PhD.], Guy McKhann II [MD.], Nima Mesgarani [PhD.], Charles Schroeder [PhD.], Catherine Schevon [MD., PhD.], Sameer A. Sheth [MD., PhD.]
Journal of Neuroscience 5 July 2022, JN-RM-0050-22; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0050-22.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-field Coupling across the Human Neocortex
John C. Myers [PhD], Elliot H. Smith [PhD.], Marcin Leszczynski [PhD.], James O’Sullivan [PhD.], Mark Yates [PhD.], Guy McKhann II [MD.], Nima Mesgarani [PhD.], Charles Schroeder [PhD.], Catherine Schevon [MD., PhD.], Sameer A. Sheth [MD., PhD.]
Journal of Neuroscience 5 July 2022, JN-RM-0050-22; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0050-22.2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Irrelevant Threats Linger and Affect Behavior in High Anxiety
  • Spatiotemporal Developmental Gradient of Thalamic Morphology, Microstructure, and Connectivity fromthe Third Trimester to Early Infancy
  • Expression of a Form of Cerebellar Motor Memory Requires Learned Alterations to the Activity of Inhibitory Molecular Layer Interneurons
Show more Research Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Disentangling Object Category Representations Driven by Dynamic and Static Visual Input
  • Irrelevant Threats Linger and Affect Behavior in High Anxiety
  • Multisession Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Context Discrimination in Mice
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.